Gel phantoms for testing cavitational ultrasound (histotripsy) transducers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8539813
  • Patent Number
    8,539,813
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 22, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 24, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) gel phantom and cavitational ultrasound testing system are provided that may include any of a number of features. One feature of the phantom and system is that it can allow for instant visual feedback on the efficacy and dosage of a Histotripsy transducer. The changes in the gel phantom can be visualized with the naked eye without having to wait for histology. The changes in the gel phantom can also be visualized with a camera, with ultrasound imaging, or with microscopy. In various embodiments, the phantom includes indicators such as carbon particles, dye-encapsulated beads, and red blood cells. Methods associated with use of the cavitational ultrasound gel phantom and testing system are also covered.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications, including patents and patent applications, mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to cavitational ultrasound therapy (e.g., Histotripsy). More specifically, the present invention relates to testing cavitational ultrasound transducers with gel phantoms.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Histotripsy is a non-invasive tissue ablation modality that focuses pulsed ultrasound from outside the body to a target tissue inside the body. Histotripsy mechanically damages tissue through cavitation of microbubbles.


Histotripsy is the mechanical disruption via acoustic cavitation of a target tissue volume or tissue embedded inclusion as part of a surgical or other therapeutic procedure. Histotripsy works best when a whole set of acoustic and transducer scan parameters controlling the spatial extent of periodic cavitation events are within a rather narrow range. Small changes in any of the parameters can result in discontinuation of the ongoing process.


Histotripsy is a new therapy modality and no methods currently exist to give an immediate indication of the spatial extent of tissue disruption. A range or workable parameters can be determined in the lab using in vitro and in vivo tissue disruption experiments with subsequent histological examination of the targeted tissue. This process can be time-consuming as histological slides take hours to days to process and read. While such experiments are necessary before clinical application, a quick “indicator” approach as a rapid check on system performance would be highly useful, particularly when a new optimized parameter set for particular clinical application is being designed.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In some embodiments, a cavitational damage indicator phantom is provided comprising a container, a gel disposed in the container, and an indicator disposed in the container, the indicator configured to change visibly during application of cavitational ultrasound energy to the indicator.


In some embodiments, the indicator is embedded between first and second layers of the gel. In other embodiments, the indicator comprises a layer having a thickness of less than 5 mm. In some embodiments, the gel comprises an agarose gel. In some embodiments, the indicator comprises a plurality of layers disposed in the container or in the gel. In additional embodiments, the indicator comprises a plurality of carbon particles. In some embodiments, the indicator comprises a plurality of microspheres. The microspheres can comprise polystyrene beads, or microencapsulated beads, for example. In one embodiment, the indicator comprises red blood cells.


In some embodiments, the visible change of the indicator can be detected by a human eye. In some embodiments, the visible change comprises the carbon particles becoming darker during application of cavitational ultrasound energy to the indicator. In additional embodiments, the visible change comprises a breakdown of the size of the carbon particles. In another embodiment, the visible change comprises spilling a pigment from the microspheres during application of cavitational ultrasound energy to the indicator.


In one embodiment, the container is at least partially transparent. In another embodiment, the gel is transparent or translucent.


A cavitational damage testing system is provided, comprising a tank filled with an acoustic medium, and a cavitational ultrasound phantom disposed in the tank, the cavitational ultrasound phantom comprising a container, a gel disposed in the container, and an indicator disposed in the container, the indicator configured to change visibly under application of cavitational ultrasound energy to the indicator.


In some embodiments, the indicator is embedded between first and second layers of the gel. In other embodiments, the indicator comprises a layer having a thickness <5 mm. In one embodiment, the gel comprises a transparent agarose gel.


In some embodiments, the indicator comprises a plurality of carbon particles. In other embodiments, the indicator comprises a plurality of microspheres. The microspheres can comprise polystyrene beads or microencapsulated beads. In another embodiment, the indicator comprises red blood cells.


In some embodiments, the cavitational damage testing system further comprises a mount disposed on or near the tank, the mount configured to receive a cavitational ultrasound transducer. In one embodiment, the mount is configured to align a focal point of the cavitational ultrasound transducer with the cavitational ultrasound phantom.


In one embodiment, the cavitational damage testing system further comprises a cavitational ultrasound therapy transducer configured to deliver cavitational ultrasound energy to the cavitational ultrasound phantom.


In another embodiment, the cavitational damage testing system further comprises an imaging system. The imaging system can be a high-speed video camera or an ultrasound imaging system, for example.


In some embodiments, the acoustic medium comprises degassed water.


A method of testing a Histotripsy transducer is provided, comprising applying Histotripsy energy to a Histotripsy phantom, and observing a visual change in the Histotripsy phantom.


In some embodiments, the visual change comprises a color change.


In another embodiment, the Histotripsy phantom comprises carbon particles disposed in a transparent gel and the visual change comprises observing the carbon particles change to a darker color.


In one embodiment, the Histotripsy phantom comprises microspheres disposed in a transparent gel and the visual change comprises releasing a dye from the microspheres during application of Histotripsy energy to the Histotripsy phantom.


In another embodiment, the method comprises, prior to the applying step, placing the Histotripsy phantom in a testing tank, and aligning a focal point of a Histotripsy transducer with the Histotripsy phantom.


In some embodiments, the applying Histotripsy energy step comprises applying Histotripsy energy to the Histotripsy phantom with the Histotripsy transducer.


In some embodiments, the Histotripsy phantom resembles a human prostate. In another embodiment, the visual change observed in the Histotripsy phantom is indicative of tissue damage to be expected during a Histotripsy procedure in a human patient.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a Histotripsy phantom.



FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a Histotripsy testing system.



FIGS. 3A-3B illustrate a plain eye view and a microscopic view, respectively, of a carbon particle gel phantom after application of Histotripsy energy.



FIGS. 4A-4B illustrate a plain eye view and a microscopic view, respectively, of a microencapsulated dye bead gel phantom after application of Histotripsy energy.



FIGS. 5A-5B illustrate a plain eye view and a microscopic view, respectively, of a Leuco dye-encapsulated bead gel phantom after application of Histotripsy energy.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Several novel methods, procedures, and devices for quick and inexpensive testing of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., such as Histotripsy) transducers are disclosed herein. The devices and methods can also allow preliminary testing of new acoustic parameter or acoustic scanning algorithms without the use of in vivo or excised tissues with subsequent histological studies, and without the need for tedious and time consuming hydrophone field pattern scanning.


The devices and methods described herein can also allow instantaneous verification of the efficacy of transducer and/or acoustic parameter sets, either via plain sight observation or microscopic observation prior to clinical application. The methods involve fabrication of optically transparent gels with indicator inclusions that are affected by incident Histotripsy ultrasound in a way that usefully mimics tissue damage to give immediate visual feedback of the volume and degree of damage produced. The indicator(s) can show up as a change in color or transparency produced by cavitation of the kind that produces tissue disruption or mechanical fractionation. Since the methods and devices described herein allow instant visual feedback, they can also be a useful research tool.


A useful indicator device, which may be referred to henceforth as a “phantom,” can be fabricated by embedding materials, agents, reagents, extracted cells, or processed tissue extracts (or fragments) in a transparent gel, which can be affected or changed immediately in some visible way by application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy to the indicator. Because the phantoms can be easily used and give immediate results under plain sight observation, these phantoms can be packaged and preserved for long shelf life to be used with Histotripsy systems.


The methods described herein can also be used to check on efficacy of acoustic parameter changes, and for testing new transducer spatial/temporal scan patterns and parameters. These methods lend themselves to rapid verification, even in the clinic, of the spatial extent of tissue damage expected for a given set of acoustic and scan parameters. Such indicator devices or phantoms can be useful adjuncts to commercially available Histotripsy systems and may be used as consumable products by those who have purchased Histotripsy systems.


By using the parameters intended for therapeutic application, a user can see in real time, or immediately after an exposure paradigm, the spatial extent and degree of tissue disruption that might be expected during the actual treatment. This can be seen visually (by the unaided eye), by a color change or transparency change of an indicator in the phantom that would indicate the volume extent of a lesion expected in the therapeutic application. A photographic or microscopic record can also be produced for further assessment at much higher resolution. Photographic or microscopic devices can be included with some embodiments of Histotripsy testing systems described herein.


The substrate for a viable indicator phantom can be a transparent gel consisting of an aqueous solution of a gelling agent (e.g., agarose, acrylamide, etc.) into which is placed an indicator which can be disrupted or changed in some way by cavitating histotripsy pulses. The change produces a color change in the affected volume showing through the transparent phantom exactly the volume affected by the transducer (with appropriate acoustic and scan parameter set) chosen for testing. Gel design can include such important parameters as melting temperature, optical transparency, hardness, mechanical stability, and shelf life of the product.


Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 illustrates a Histotripsy phantom 100 comprising a container 102, a gel 104 disposed in the container, and an indicator 106 disposed in the container. Although the phantom 100 is described as a Histotripsy phantom, it should be understood that the phantom can be used with any form of cavitational ultrasound. As shown in FIG. 1, the gel 104 can comprise two layers 104a and 104b, with the indicator 106 sandwiched between the two gel layers. The indicator layer can have a thickness of less than 5 mm, for example, and the gel layers can have any desired thickness depending on the size of the container. In some embodiments, the gel is transparent to allow direct visualization of the indicator through the gel. In other embodiments, the gel is translucent, which still allows for direct visualization of the indicator through the gel. The gel can be an agarose gel, for example, which provides for a transparent and acoustically transmissive medium. In some embodiments, either the entire container or at least a portion of the container (e.g., the top of the container) is transparent or translucent to allow for direct visualization of the indicator through both the gel and the container.


The indicator can be cast into the gel in different geometries, e.g., in thin sheets or planes at high concentration with very transparent layers on top and bottom. Such a construct would allow a cross-section to be seen very clearly with boundary effects clearly assessed with just a glance or in more detail by macro-photography or microscopy. Multiple layers of indicators within the gel can allow such assessments to be made in different planes. Or, a whole volume-effect can be discerned if the indicator is distributed uniformly throughout the gel and container. Indicator shapes mimicking target volumes can also be cast in the container, allowing for practice phantoms useful in finding optimized histotripsy parameter sets. For example, an indicator can have the shape of a prostate. In some embodiments, scatterers can be added to the phantom to make the acoustic properties of the gel similar to soft tissue, including impedance and attenuation. The containers can also include skeletal models embedded in the gel (e.g., a skeletal model of the pelvis in the prostate indicator embodiment) designed to mimic ultrasound attenuation of surrounding bone and tissues.


Other variations are possible including gel phantoms with a monolayer of cells grown on a surface for surface erosion studies, or a monolayer grown on a surface overfilled with another transparent volume. This can be used to study the effects of Histotripsy on a layer of cells, perhaps producing a diffusion resistant barrier, useful for testing drug delivery modes for Histotripsy.


The indicator 106 can be configured to change visually during application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy to the indicator. The visual change of the indicator can be, for example, a color change (e.g., a change from white to red), a change in darkness (e.g., a change from light to dark or from dark to light), or a change in transparency (e.g., from transparent to translucent or opaque).



FIG. 2 illustrates a Histotripsy testing system 200 comprising a Histotripsy phantom 100 (such as Histotripsy phantom 100 from FIG. 1), tank 208, Histotripsy transducer 210, mount 212, controller 214, RF amplifier 216, and imaging system 218. The tank can be filled with an acoustic coupling medium, such as degassed water for example. Controller 214 and RF amplifier 216 can be configured to drive Histotripsy transducer 210 to deliver cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy to a target. In some embodiments, the controller, RF amplifier, and Histotripsy transducer are configured to apply cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy comprising acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-40 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle of less than 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz. These Histotripsy parameters are sufficient to allow for the generation of cavitational microbubbles in a target (such as the indicator phantom).


The tank can further include a mount configured to receive the Histotripsy transducer 210. In some embodiments, the mount is moveable to allow for alignment of focal point 220 of the Histotripsy transducer with the Histotripsy phantom, and more particularly, with the indicator 106 of the phantom. In other embodiments, the phantom itself can be mounted to a moveable mount, such as a mechanical arm, and the position of the transducer on the tank is fixed. In this embodiment, the phantom can be moved to align a focal point 220 of the transducer with the indicator of the phantom.


The Histotripsy testing system can also include an imaging system 218 to allow for photographic, microscopic, ultrasound, and/or video imaging of the phantom prior to, during, and after application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy. The imaging system can comprise a still camera, a video camera, an ultrasound imaging probe, and/or a microscope, for example.


Many types of indicators can be used in phantom 100 and system 200 of FIGS. 1-2. Referring back to FIG. 1, in one embodiment, the indicator 106 can comprise a plurality of carbon particles, such as graphite powder. In some embodiments, the aggregate size of the graphite powder particles can be approximately 100-200 μm and the carbon particles indicator layer can be a 0.25% w/v of graphite powder to agarose solution, for example. This particular ratio may allow for a degree of translucency which is important for the direct visualization of Histotripsy lesions.



FIGS. 3A-3B illustrate a top down plain eye view and a microscopic view, respectively, of a gel phantom with a carbon particle indicator after application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy. As shown in FIG. 3A, lesions 322, 324, and 326 can be clearly seen with the naked eye as dark spots or regions which are surrounded by lighter, untreated regions in the carbon particle indicator. Application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy to the carbon particle indicator mechanically breaks down the carbon particles, which can cause the color of the indicator to change visibly to the naked eye from a light shade to a dark shade. Additionally, direct visualization of the phantom can also show dose dependency. For example, still referring to FIG. 3A it can be seen that lesion 322 received a lower dose of Histotripsy than lesion 324, which received a lower dose of Histotripsy than lesion 326. Lesion 322 is the lightest of the three lesions, and shows the least defined borders. In contrast, lesion 326 is much darker than lesions 322 and 324, and also has cleaner, more defined borders. In one embodiment, lesions 322, 324, and 326 represent application of 2000, 4000, and 6000 Histotripsy pulses to the carbon particle indicator, respectively.



FIG. 3B illustrates a microscopic view of the carbon particle indicator before and after application of Histotripsy therapy. As shown, the untreated carbon particles 328 on the left of line 3B-3B are larger than the treated carbon particles 330 on the right of line 3B-3B. Prior to treatment, carbon aggregate size may range upwards of 100-200 μm. After application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy, the carbon particles can have a size smaller than 20 μm, depending on the Histotripsy dose. Thus, the change in aggregate size of carbon particles before and after cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy delivery can easily be seen with a microscope in addition to the naked eye.


Referring back to FIG. 1, in another embodiment, the indicator 106 can comprise a plurality of microencapsulated dye beads. In some embodiments, the aggregate size of the microencapsulated dye beads can be approximately 75-100 μm in diameter that encapsulate <5 μm pigments. The dye can be encapsulated in any thin shell (constructed of a polymer, protein, lipid, etc.) In one embodiment, the dye bead indicator layer can be 8% w/v of dye beads to agarose solution, for example. This particular ratio may allow for a degree of translucency which is important for the direct visualization of Histotripsy lesions.



FIGS. 4A-4B illustrate a top down plain eye view and a microscopic view, respectively, of a gel phantom with a microencapsulated dye beads indicator after application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy. As shown in FIG. 4A, lesions 432, 434, 436, 438, and 440 can be clearly seen with the naked eye as colored spots or regions which are surrounded by transparent/translucent, untreated regions in the dye bead indicator. Although the illustrations are shown in black and white, it should be understood that the dye encapsulated in the beads can be any color (e.g., red, blue, black, etc). Ideally, the color of the dye can be easily distinguished from Application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy to the dye bead indicator can mechanically fractionate the dye beads, releasing the colored dye into the phantom so that it is visible to the naked eye. Additionally, direct visualization of the phantom can also show dose dependency, although not to the extent that can be seen with the carbon particle indicator. For example, still referring to FIG. 4A it can be seen that lesion 432 received a lower dose of Histotripsy than lesions 434, 436, and 438, which received a lower dose of Histotripsy than lesion 440. Lesion 432 is the smallest and least defined of the five lesions. In contrast, lesion 440 is much darker than the other lesions, and also has cleaner, more defined borders. In one embodiment, lesions 432, 434, 436, 438, and 440 represent application of 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 6000 Histotripsy pulses to the microencapsulated dye beads indicator, respectively.



FIG. 4B illustrates a microscopic view of the microencapsulated dye beads indicator before and after application of Histotripsy therapy. As shown, the untreated dye beads 442 on the left of line 4B-4B can be distinguished from released dye 444 on the right of line 4B-4B. Prior to treatment, the dye beads may have a size of approximately 75-100 μm. After application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy, the beads are destroyed allowing the dye to spill into the surrounding gel phantom. Thus, the release of dye from the microencapsulated beads after cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy delivery can easily be seen with a microscope in addition to the naked eye.


Referring again to FIG. 1, in another embodiment, the indicator 106 can comprise a plurality of leuco dye beads. Leuco dye beads can include an interior dye, which upon release, chemically combine with a separate indicator powder to change colors. In some embodiments, the leuco dye beads can be approximately 5-10 μm in diameter. In one embodiment, the leuco dye bead indicator layer can be 20% w/v of leuco dye beads to agarose solution, for example. Any ratio of beads to indicator powder can be used, but in some embodiments, a 2:1 ratio of beads to indicator powder shows the highest intensity of color change.


In some embodiments of the dye beads, the dye can be a fluorescent dye which is quenched either in the encapsulated or un-encapsulated state, thus producing a clear or fluorescent volume when the enclosing capsules are disrupted by Histotripsy cavitation. This embodiment may require subsequent exposure to an excitation illumination for assay after the test procedure, most likely with ultraviolet light.


In yet another embodiment, the indicator can be a dye or fluorescent dye conjugated with the gel producing a material which cannot diffuse freely in the gel, which might then be exposed to Histotripsy sequences. The resulting cavitation can produce free radicals (e.g., active oxygen species, or hydroxyl radicals) all of which may bleach or chemically modify the indicator dye changing (or removing) its color or fluorescent activity. In any case, such modification would produce a volume easily seen as that which is affected by the cavitation activity.



FIGS. 5A-5B illustrate a top down plain eye view and a microscopic view, respectively, of a gel phantom with a leuco dye beads indicator after application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy. As shown in FIG. 5A, lesions 546, 548, 550, and 552 can be clearly seen with the naked eye as colored spots or regions which are surrounded by transparent/translucent, untreated regions in the dye bead indicator. Application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy to the dye bead indicator can mechanically fractionate the dye beads, releasing the dye into the phantom which chemically reacts with the indicator powder, causing a color change that it is visible to the naked eye. The lesions in the phantom can be seen as “donuts” with clearly defined boundaries and a dark gray interior region. Additionally, direct visualization of the phantom can also show dose dependency, although not to the extent that can be seen with the carbon particle indicator.



FIG. 5B illustrates a microscopic view of the leuco dye beads indicator before and after application of Histotripsy therapy. As shown, the untreated dye beads 554 on the left of line 5B-5B can be distinguished from the chemically reacted dye 556 on the right of line 5B-5B. Prior to treatment, the dye beads may have a size of approximately 5-10 μm. After application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy, the beads are destroyed allowing the dye to spill into the surrounding gel phantom to react with the indicator powder. Thus, the release of dye from the microencapsulated beads after cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy delivery can easily be seen with a microscope in addition to the naked eye.


Although not shown in the drawings, an alternate embodiment of an indicator can comprise polystyrene beads. The polystyrene beads can show a visual change between treated and untreated portions. However, since the polystyrene beads are semi-translucent, they can be more difficult to differentiate against the gel layers than the other embodiments described above.


In an additional embodiment the indicator 106 can comprise red blood cells. Application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy to a gel phantom having a red blood cell indicator can create changes to the indicator visible to the naked eye, as described above in the other embodiments. Histotripsy pulses, if adjusted for tissue disruption, will break up the red blood cells in a manner very similar to disruption of living tissue with the same boundary between affected and non affected tissue. When the red blood cells are disrupted, the gel is rendered clear (no pink color) in the disrupted volume clearly showing at one glance the spatial extent of the disrupted volume. This volume can show the extent of the cavitation activity and, therefore, the expected damage zone to be produced clinically. Therefore, a very quick visual test of the transducer can be possible immediately before treatment. Moreover, the boundary can be assessed by macro photography, or microscopy, to see boundary effects more clearly.


In other embodiments, gels with temperature indicators as well as cavitation indicators can be used for assessing possible thermal complications of certain (e.g., high PRF) parameters.


It is also important to note that the phantom can be engineered to give both visual (it is a transparent gel with specially formulated inclusions) as well as the same ultrasound imaging feedback as real tissue for different histotripsy dose. Thus one could fabricate a clear gel phantom which would look under ultrasound imaging just like the real tissue to be treated, (e.g., the prostate, uterine fibroid, breast cancer, etc.) Then, one could see instantly with the eye or ultrasound imaging how any new parameter set or focus scanning paradigm would likely work in vivo. Lesions in the phantoms show reduced echogenecity in B-mode images than untreated areas of the phantom.


The Histotripsy phantoms described herein can have two modes of application: a spatial indicator mode and a dose indicator mode. Spatial mode can give a look at the volume likely to be affected. Red blood cells or other mechanically disruptable (fragile) inclusions (including disruptable dyes or pigments) work well in spatial mode. These types of phantoms show virtually the same spatial indications of damage as real tissue but can be immediately and visually assessed without waiting for histology. The results are also clearly shown in ultrasound imaging, which is the same imaging to be used in vivo.


To obtain a dose phantom, some number of inclusions can be included in the transparent gel, each of which is progressively more resistant to mechanical disruption, even closely paralleling results in specific cells or tissues (i.e., important tissues and cell organelles can be identified along with their sensitivity to mechanical disruption). If “n” of these are identified, there would be “n” different inclusions. Then, for a given dose, or likely the number of pulses at a set intensity, PRF, and pulse width which is sufficient to disrupt 50% of a given structure compared to nearby untreated tissue. A phantom can then be examined (several modes of examination possible) which gives the percent of the different indicators which have been damaged. For example, indicators can be made with damage sensitivities similar to cell membranes, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and cell nuclei, as well as for complex tissue like vascular capillaries or glandular functional units.


Indicators can be assessed after exposure by looking optically for surviving structures (polymer beads for example) or by the fluorescent dye released with indicator fractionation. Multiple dyes of different color could be assessed in one shot by a spectrophotometer. Ultrasound can give the same image (with the proper phantom) as expected in tissue both treated and untreated.


Therefore, a given tissue under treatment (e.g., prostate or liver) can have a tissue specific phantom which would give some degree of confidence in final clinical result based on exposure and assessment of the phantom.


Methods of using a Histotripsy testing system, such as system 200 of FIG. 2, will now be described. As described above, the Histotripsy testing system can be used for instantaneous verification of the efficacy of transducer and/or acoustic parameter sets, to check on efficacy of acoustic parameter changes, and for testing new transducer spatial/temporal scan patterns and parameters. These methods lend themselves to rapid verification, even in the clinic, of the spatial extent of tissue damage expected for a given set of acoustic and scan parameters.


In one embodiment, a method of testing a Histotripsy transducer comprises applying cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy to a Histotripsy phantom and observing a visual change in the Histotripsy phantom. The Histotripsy phantom can be any of the phantoms described herein. For example, the Histotripsy phantom can comprise a transparent or translucent container filled with a gel (such as agarose gel), and can include an indicator disposed in the gel. The cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy can be applied by a Histotripsy transducer to the phantom.


In some embodiments, the method can further comprise inserting the phantom into a tank, filling the tank with an acoustic medium (such as degassed water), and directing the cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy through the acoustic medium towards the Histotripsy phantom to align a focal point of the Histotripsy transducer with an indicator of the phantom. In some embodiments, the Histotripsy transducer can be mounted to the tank, and the transducer and/or mount can be moved to align the focal point of the transducer with the indicator of the phantom. In other embodiments, the phantom itself can be mounted to the tank, and the phantom can be moved to align the indicator with the focal point of the transducer.


In some embodiments, the method can comprise observing a visual change in the Histotripsy phantom with the naked eye. The Histotripsy phantoms described herein advantageously allow direct visualization of changes to the phantom resulting from application of cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy without having to wait for histology. In other embodiments, the method can comprise observing the visual change in the Histotripsy phantom with a camera (such as a high-speed video camera), with an ultrasound imaging system, or with a microscope, for example.


In some embodiments, the method can comprise observing a visual change in a carbon particles indicator. In these embodiments, the areas or “lesions” within the phantom that receive cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy will darken in color as energy is applied. The method can comprise observing both efficacy and dosage of the Histotripsy therapy. In other embodiments, the method can comprise observing a visual change in a dye-bead indicator. In these embodiments, the areas or “lesions” within the phantom that receive cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy will change in color from transparent or translucent to the color of the dye contained within the beads (e.g., such as red, black, blue, yellow, etc). These methods can comprise observing both efficacy and dosage of the Histotripsy therapy. In yet additional embodiments, the method can comprise observing a visual change in a red blood cells indicator. In these embodiments, the areas or “lesions” within the phantom that receive cavitational ultrasound (e.g., Histotripsy) energy will change in color from red or pink to a lighter shade or to a transparent/translucent color as energy is applied.


In some embodiments, the phantom itself can be designed to resemble either visually or physically an organ or tissue to be treated. For example, the phantom can be shaped or include an indicator shaped to the size and tissue density of a human prostate. Applying energy from the Histotripsy transducer to the prostate shaped indicator can allow the user to test or verify various Histotripsy parameters and dosages before conducting an actual Histotripsy procedure. Other tissue shapes and tissue densities can be formed in the phantom, including shapes and densities similar to the liver, kidney, various tumors such as uterine fibroids, breast fibroadenomas, or carcinoma, for example.


As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.

Claims
  • 1. A cavitational damage indicator phantom, comprising: a container;a gel disposed in the container; andan indicator disposed in the container, the indicator configured to change visibly during application of cavitational ultrasound energy to the indicator.
  • 2. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the indicator is embedded between first and second layers of the gel.
  • 3. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 2 wherein the indicator comprises a layer having a thickness of less than 5 mm.
  • 4. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the gel comprises an agarose gel.
  • 5. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the indicator comprises a plurality of carbon particles.
  • 6. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 5 wherein the visible change comprises the carbon particles becoming darker during application of cavitational ultrasound energy to the indicator.
  • 7. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 5 wherein the visible change comprises a breakdown of the size of the carbon particles.
  • 8. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the indicator comprises a plurality of microspheres.
  • 9. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 8 wherein the microspheres comprise polystyrene beads.
  • 10. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 8 wherein the microspheres comprise microencapsulated beads.
  • 11. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 8 wherein the visible change comprises spilling a pigment from the microspheres during application of cavitational ultrasound energy to the indicator.
  • 12. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the indicator comprises red blood cells.
  • 13. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the visible change of the indicator can be detected by a human eye.
  • 14. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the visible change comprises a color change.
  • 15. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 6 wherein the indicator comprises a plurality of layers disposed in the container.
  • 16. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the container is at least partially transparent.
  • 17. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the gel is transparent.
  • 18. The cavitational damage indicator phantom of claim 1 wherein the gel is translucent.
  • 19. A cavitational damage testing system, comprising: a tank filled with an acoustic medium; anda cavitational ultrasound phantom disposed in the tank, the cavitational ultrasound phantom comprising a container, a gel disposed in the container, and an indicator disposed in the container, the indicator configured to change visibly under application of cavitational ultrasound energy to the indicator.
  • 20. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 wherein the indicator is embedded between first and second layers of the gel.
  • 21. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 20 wherein the indicator comprises a layer having a thickness <5 mm.
  • 22. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 wherein the gel comprises a transparent agarose gel.
  • 23. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 wherein the indicator comprises a plurality of carbon particles.
  • 24. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 wherein the indicator comprises a plurality of microspheres.
  • 25. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 24 wherein the microspheres comprise polystyrene beads.
  • 26. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 24 wherein the microspheres comprise microencapsulated beads.
  • 27. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 wherein the indicator comprises red blood cells.
  • 28. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 further comprising a mount disposed on or near the tank, the mount configured to receive a cavitational ultrasound transducer.
  • 29. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 28 wherein the mount is configured to align a focal point of the cavitational ultrasound transducer with the cavitational ultrasound phantom.
  • 30. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 further comprising a cavitational ultrasound therapy transducer configured to deliver cavitational ultrasound energy to the cavitational ultrasound phantom.
  • 31. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 further comprising an imaging system.
  • 32. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 31 wherein the imaging system comprises a high-speed video camera.
  • 33. The cavitational damage testing system of claim 19 wherein the acoustic medium comprises degassed water.
  • 34. A method of testing a Histotripsy transducer, comprising: applying Histotripsy energy to a Histotripsy phantom; andobserving a visual change in the Histotripsy phantom.
  • 35. The method of claim 34 wherein the visual change comprises a color change.
  • 36. The method of claim 34 wherein the Histotripsy phantom comprises carbon particles disposed in a transparent gel and the visual change comprises observing the carbon particles change to a darker color.
  • 37. The method of claim 34 wherein the Histotripsy phantom comprises microspheres disposed in a transparent gel and the visual change comprises releasing a dye from the microspheres during application of Histotripsy energy to the Histotripsy phantom.
  • 38. The method of claim 34 further comprising, prior to the applying step: placing the Histotripsy phantom in a testing tank; andaligning a focal point of a Histotripsy transducer with the Histotripsy phantom.
  • 39. The method of claim 38 wherein the applying Histotripsy energy step comprises applying Histotripsy energy to the Histotripsy phantom with the Histotripsy transducer.
  • 40. The method of claim 34 wherein the Histotripsy phantom resembles a human prostate.
  • 41. The method of claim 34 wherein the visual change observed in the Histotripsy phantom is indicative of tissue damage to be expected during a Histotripsy procedure in a human patient.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/244,619, filed Sep. 22, 2009, titled “Gel Phantoms for Testing Cavitational Ultrasound (Histotripsy) Transducers”. This application is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (227)
Number Name Date Kind
3679021 Goldberg et al. Jul 1972 A
4024501 Herring et al. May 1977 A
4117446 Alais Sep 1978 A
4269174 Adair May 1981 A
4277367 Madsen et al. Jul 1981 A
4351038 Alais Sep 1982 A
4406153 Ophir et al. Sep 1983 A
4440025 Hayakawa et al. Apr 1984 A
4453408 Clayman Jun 1984 A
4483345 Miwa Nov 1984 A
4549533 Cain et al. Oct 1985 A
4550606 Drost Nov 1985 A
4622972 Giebeler, Jr. Nov 1986 A
4641378 McConnell et al. Feb 1987 A
4689986 Carson et al. Sep 1987 A
4757820 Itoh Jul 1988 A
4791915 Barsotti et al. Dec 1988 A
4819621 Ueberle et al. Apr 1989 A
4829491 Saugeon et al. May 1989 A
4856107 Dory Aug 1989 A
4865042 Umemura et al. Sep 1989 A
4888746 Wurster et al. Dec 1989 A
4890267 Rudolph Dec 1989 A
4922917 Dory May 1990 A
4938217 Lele Jul 1990 A
4991151 Dory Feb 1991 A
4995012 Dory Feb 1991 A
RE33590 Dory May 1991 E
5014686 Schafer May 1991 A
5065751 Wolf Nov 1991 A
5080101 Dory Jan 1992 A
5080102 Dory Jan 1992 A
5091893 Smith et al. Feb 1992 A
5092336 Fink Mar 1992 A
5097709 Masuzawa et al. Mar 1992 A
5111822 Dory May 1992 A
5143073 Dory Sep 1992 A
5143074 Dory Sep 1992 A
5150711 Dory Sep 1992 A
5158070 Dory Oct 1992 A
5158071 Umemura et al. Oct 1992 A
5163421 Bernstein et al. Nov 1992 A
5209221 Riedlinger May 1993 A
5215680 D'Arrigo Jun 1993 A
5219401 Cathignol et al. Jun 1993 A
5230340 Rhyne Jul 1993 A
5295484 Marcus et al. Mar 1994 A
5316000 Chapelon et al. May 1994 A
5354258 Dory Oct 1994 A
5380411 Schlief Jan 1995 A
5409002 Pell Apr 1995 A
5431621 Dory Jul 1995 A
5435311 Umemura et al. Jul 1995 A
5443069 Schaetzle Aug 1995 A
5469852 Nakamura et al. Nov 1995 A
5474071 Chapelon et al. Dec 1995 A
5474531 Carter Dec 1995 A
5501655 Rolt et al. Mar 1996 A
5520188 Hennige et al. May 1996 A
5523058 Umemura et al. Jun 1996 A
5524620 Rosenschein Jun 1996 A
5540909 Schutt Jul 1996 A
5542935 Unger et al. Aug 1996 A
5558092 Unger et al. Sep 1996 A
5563346 Bartelt et al. Oct 1996 A
5566675 Li et al. Oct 1996 A
5573497 Chapelon Nov 1996 A
5580575 Unger et al. Dec 1996 A
5582578 Zhong et al. Dec 1996 A
5590657 Cain et al. Jan 1997 A
5601526 Chapelon et al. Feb 1997 A
5617862 Cole et al. Apr 1997 A
5648098 Porter Jul 1997 A
5666954 Chapelon et al. Sep 1997 A
5676692 Sanghvi et al. Oct 1997 A
5678554 Hossack et al. Oct 1997 A
5694936 Fujimoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5695460 Siegel et al. Dec 1997 A
5717657 Ruffa Feb 1998 A
5724972 Petrofsky Mar 1998 A
5743863 Chapelon Apr 1998 A
5759162 Oppelt et al. Jun 1998 A
5769790 Watkins et al. Jun 1998 A
5797848 Marian et al. Aug 1998 A
5823962 Schaetzle et al. Oct 1998 A
5827204 Grandia et al. Oct 1998 A
5836896 Rosenschein Nov 1998 A
5849727 Porter et al. Dec 1998 A
5873902 Sanghvi et al. Feb 1999 A
5879314 Peterson et al. Mar 1999 A
5932807 Mallart Aug 1999 A
5947904 Hossack et al. Sep 1999 A
6001069 Tachibana et al. Dec 1999 A
6022309 Celliers et al. Feb 2000 A
6036667 Manna et al. Mar 2000 A
6088613 Unger Jul 2000 A
6093883 Sanghvi et al. Jul 2000 A
6113558 Rosenschein et al. Sep 2000 A
6126607 Whitmore, III et al. Oct 2000 A
6128958 Cain Oct 2000 A
6143018 Beuthan et al. Nov 2000 A
6176842 Tachibana et al. Jan 2001 B1
6308585 Nilsson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308710 Silva Oct 2001 B1
6309355 Cain et al. Oct 2001 B1
6318146 Madsen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321109 Ben-Haim et al. Nov 2001 B2
6344489 Spears Feb 2002 B1
6391020 Kurtz et al. May 2002 B1
6413216 Cain et al. Jul 2002 B1
6419648 Vitek et al. Jul 2002 B1
6470204 Uzgiris et al. Oct 2002 B1
6488639 Ribault et al. Dec 2002 B1
6490469 Candy Dec 2002 B2
6500141 Irion et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506154 Ezion et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506171 Vitek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508774 Acker et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511428 Azuma et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511444 Hynynen et al. Jan 2003 B2
6522142 Freundlich Feb 2003 B1
6524251 Rabiner et al. Feb 2003 B2
6543272 Vitek Apr 2003 B1
6559644 Froundlich et al. May 2003 B2
6576220 Unger Jun 2003 B2
6599288 Maguire et al. Jul 2003 B2
6607498 Eshel Aug 2003 B2
6612988 Maor et al. Sep 2003 B2
6613004 Vitek et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613005 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626854 Friedman et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626855 Weng et al. Sep 2003 B1
6635486 Madsen et al. Oct 2003 B2
6645162 Friedman et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648839 Manna et al. Nov 2003 B2
6666833 Friedman et al. Dec 2003 B1
6685640 Fry et al. Feb 2004 B1
6685657 Jones Feb 2004 B2
6705994 Vortman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719449 Laugharn, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 B1
6719694 Weng et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735461 Vitek et al. May 2004 B2
6736814 Manna et al. May 2004 B2
6770031 Hynynen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790180 Vitek Sep 2004 B2
6852082 Strickberger et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869439 White et al. Mar 2005 B2
6890332 Truckai et al. May 2005 B2
6929609 Asafusa Aug 2005 B2
7004282 Manna et al. Feb 2006 B2
7059168 Hibi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7128711 Medan et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128719 Rosenberg Oct 2006 B2
7175596 Vitek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7223239 Schulze et al. May 2007 B2
7258674 Cribbs et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273458 Prausnitz et al. Sep 2007 B2
7273459 Desilets et al. Sep 2007 B2
7300414 Holland et al. Nov 2007 B1
7311679 Desilets et al. Dec 2007 B2
7331951 Eshel et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341569 Soltani et al. Mar 2008 B2
7347855 Eshel et al. Mar 2008 B2
7358226 Dayton et al. Apr 2008 B2
7367948 O'Donnell et al. May 2008 B2
7374551 Liang et al. May 2008 B2
7377900 Vitek et al. May 2008 B2
7442168 Novak et al. Oct 2008 B2
7462488 Madsen et al. Dec 2008 B2
7559905 Kagosaki et al. Jul 2009 B2
7656638 Laakso et al. Feb 2010 B2
20010039420 Burbank et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041163 Sugita et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020045890 Celliers et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078964 Kovac et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099356 Unger et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030092982 Eppstein May 2003 A1
20030112922 Burdette et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030157025 Unger et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030221561 Milo Dec 2003 A1
20040060340 Hibi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040127815 Marchitto et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138563 Moehring et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040236248 Svedman Nov 2004 A1
20040243021 Murphy et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038339 Chauhan et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050154314 Quistgaard Jul 2005 A1
20050283098 Conston et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060060991 Holsteyns et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074303 Chornenky et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060206028 Lee et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060241466 Ottoboni et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241523 Sinelnikov et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060264760 Liu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070010805 Fedewa et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016039 Vortman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070065420 Johnson Mar 2007 A1
20070083120 Cain et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070161902 Dan Jul 2007 A1
20070219448 Seip et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080013593 Kawabata Jan 2008 A1
20080082026 Schmidt et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080126665 Burr et al. May 2008 A1
20080214964 Chapelon et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080262345 Fichtinger et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262486 Zvuloni et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080312561 Chauhan Dec 2008 A1
20080319356 Cain et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090030339 Cheng et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090112098 Vaezy et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090177085 Maxwell et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198094 Fenster et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090211587 Lawrentschuk Aug 2009 A1
20090227874 Suri et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100069797 Cain et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100125225 Gelbart et al. May 2010 A1
20100286519 Lee et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100317971 Fan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110040190 Jahnke et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110172529 Gertner Jul 2011 A1
20120010541 Cain et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029353 Slayton et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120092724 Pettis Apr 2012 A1
20120130288 Holland et al. May 2012 A1
20120189998 Kruecker et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120271167 Holland et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130053691 Kawabata et al. Feb 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
3544628 Jun 1987 DE
3817094 Nov 1989 DE
0017382 Oct 1980 EP
0320303 Jun 1989 EP
0332871 Sep 1989 EP
0384831 Aug 1990 EP
0755653 Jan 1997 EP
2099582 Dec 1982 GB
2010029650 Feb 2010 JP
WO9406355 Mar 1994 WO
WO 0232506 Apr 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (32)
Entry
Hall et al.; Imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction (histotripsy) in ultrasound surgery; IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Sep. 18-21, 2005, pp. 1732-1734.
Cain, Charles A.; Histrotripsy: controlled mechanical sub-division of soft tissues by high intensity pulsed ultrasound (conference presentation); American Institute of Physics (AIP) Therapeutic Ultrasound: 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound; 44 pgs.; Oct. 27-29, 2005.
Parsons et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 32; pp. 115-129; 2006.
Roberts et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney; Journal of Urology; vol. 175; pp. 734-738; 2006.
Xu et al.; A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion by using a high intensity initiating sequence; IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Freq Control; vol. 53; pp. 1412-1424; 2006.
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 117; pp. 424-435; 2005.
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion; IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; vol. 51; pp. 726-736; 2004.
Xu et al.; Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy); Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 122; pp. 229-236; 2007.
Xu et al.; High Speed Imaging of Bubble Clouds Generated in Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy Histotripsy; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; ; vol. 54; No. 10; pp. 2091R2101; Oct. 2007.
Xu et al.; Investigation of intensity threshold for ultrasound tissue erosion; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 31; pp. 1673-1682; 2005.
Xu et al.; Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 121; pp. 2421-2430; 2007.
Hall et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,768 entitled “Micromanipulator Control Arm for Therapeutic and Imaging Ultrasound Transducers,” filed Aug. 26, 2010.
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,775 entitled “Devices and Methods for Using Controlled Bubble Cloud Cavitation in Fractionating Urinary Stones,” filed Aug. 26, 2010.
Appel et al.; Stereoscopic highspeed recording of bubble filaments; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry; vol. 11(1); pp. 39-42; Jan. 2004.
Atchley et al.; Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound; Ultrasonics.; vol. 26(5); pp. 280-285; Sep. 1988.
Bland et al.; Surgical Oncology; McGraw Hill; Chap. 5 (Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator); pp. 461-462; Jan. 29, 2001.
Burdin et al.; Implementation of the laser diffraction technique for cavitation bubble investigations; Particle & Particle Systems Characterization; vol. 19; pp. 73-83; May 2002.
Holland et al.; Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; vol. 88(5); pp. 2059-2069; Nov. 1990.
Huber et al.; Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter; Physics in Medicine and Biology; vol. 43 (10); pp. 3113-3128; Oct. 1998.
Lauterborn et al.; Cavitation bubble dynamics studied by high speed photography and holography: part one; Ultrasonics; vol. 23; pp. 260-268; Nov. 1985.
Miller et al.; A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; vol. 22; pp. 1131-1154; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1996.
Ohl et al.; Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence; Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A; vol. 357; pp. 269-294; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1999.
Pishchalnikov et al.; Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shock Waves; J Endourol.; 17(7): 435-446; Sep. 2003.
Porter et al.; Reduction in left ventricular cavitary attenuation and improvement in posterior myocardial contrast . . . ; J Am Soc Echocardiography; pp. 437-441; Jul.-Aug. 1996.
Roy et al.; A precise technique for the measurement of acoustic cavitation thresholds and some preliminary results; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 78(5); pp. 1799-1805; Nov. 1985.
Sapozhnikov et al.; Ultrasound-Guided Localized Detection of Cavitation During Lithotripsy in Pig Kidney in Vivo; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, vol. 2; pp. 1347-1350; Oct. 7-10, 2001.
Sokolov et al.; Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 110(3); pp. 1685-1695; Sep. 2001.
Teofilovic, Dejan; U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,783 entitled “Systems and Methods for Obtaining Large Creepage Isolation on Printed Circuit Boards,” filed Apr. 13, 2012.
Cain, Charles A.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,708 entitled “Lesion Generation Through Bone Using Histotripsy Therapy Without Aberration Correction,” filed Aug. 9, 2012.
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,955 entitled “Pulsed Cavitational Therapeutic Ultrasound With Dithering,” filed Oct. 10, 2012.
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,965 entitled “Imaging Feedback of Histotripsy Treatments with Ultrasound Transient Elastography,” filed Oct. 10, 2012.
Avago Technologies; ACNV2601 High Insulation Voltage 10 MBd Digital Opotcoupler. Avago Technologies Data Sheet; pp. 1-11; Jul. 29, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110067624 A1 Mar 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61244619 Sep 2009 US