The present application is a U.S. national stage application of PCT/IB2015/050243 having an International filing date of Jan. 13, 2015, and claims foreign priority to European applications No EP 14150939.8 filed on Jan. 13, 2014, EP 14173947.4 filed on Jun. 25, 2014, EP 14183385.5 filed on Sep. 3, 2014, EP 14183624.7 filed on Sep. 4, 2014, and EP 14195719.1 filed on Dec. 1, 2014, the contents of all five earlier filed EP applications and the PCT application being incorporated in their entirety by reference.
1 Context
The biggest improvement in timekeeper accuracy was due to the introduction of the oscillator as a time base, first the pendulum by Christiaan Huygens in 1656, then the balance wheel—spiral spring by Huygens and Hooke in about 1675, and the tuning fork by N. Niaudet and L. C. Breguet in 1866, see references [20][5]. Since that time, these have been the only mechanical oscillators used in mechanical clocks and in all watches. (Balance wheels with electromagnetic restoring force approximating a spiral spring are included in the category balance wheel-spiral spring.) In mechanical clocks and watches, these oscillators require an escapement and this mechanism poses numerous problems due to its inherent complexity and its relatively low efficiency which barely reaches 40% at the very best. Escapements have an inherent inefficiency since they are based on intermittent motion in which the whole movement must be stopped and restarted, leading to wasteful acceleration from rest and noise due to impacts. Escapements are well known to be the most complicated and delicate part of the watch, and there has never been a completely satisfying escapement for a wristwatch, as opposed to the detent escapement for the marine chronometer.
Swiss patent No 113025 published on Dec. 16, 1925 discloses a process to drive an oscillating mechanism. A mentioned aim of this document is to replace an intermittent regulation by a continuous regulation but it fails to clearly disclose how the principles exposed apply to a timekeeper such as a watch. In particular, the constructions are not described as isotropic harmonic oscillators and only the simplest versions of the oscillator are described,
Swiss patent application No 9110/67 published on Jun. 27, 1967 discloses a rotational resonator for a timekeeper. The disclosed resonator comprises two masses mounted in a cantilevered manner on a central support, each mass oscillating circularly around an axis of symmetry. Each mass is attached to the central support via four springs. The springs of each mass are connected to each other to obtain a dynamic coupling of the masses. To maintain the rotational oscillation of the masses, an electromagnetic device is used that acts on ears of each mass, the ears containing a permanent magnet. One of the springs comprises a pawl for cooperation with a ratchet wheel in order to transform the oscillating motion of the masses into a unidirectional rotational movement. The disclosed system therefore is still based on the transformation of an oscillation, that is an intermittent movement, into a rotation via the pawl which renders the system of this publication equivalent to the escapement system known in the art and cited above.
Swiss additional patent No 512757 published on May 14, 1971 is related to a mechanical rotating resonator for a timekeeper. This patent is mainly directed to the description of springs used in such a resonator as disclosed in CH patent application No 9110/67 discussed above. Here again, the principle of the resonator thus uses a mass oscillating around an axis.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,318,087 published on May 9, 1967 discloses a torsion oscillator that oscillates around a vertical axis. Again, this is similar to the escapement of the prior art and described above.
An aim of the present invention is thus to improve the known systems and methods.
A further aim of the present invention is to provide a system that avoids the intermittent motion of the escapements known in the art.
A further aim of the present invention is to propose a mechanical isotropic harmonic oscillator.
Another aim of the present invention is to provide an oscillator that may be used in different time-related applications, such as: time base for a chronograph, timekeeper (such as a watch), accelerometer, speed governor.
The present invention solves the problem of the escapement by eliminating it completely or, alternatively, by a family of new simplified escapements which do not have the drawbacks of current watch escapements.
The result is a much simplified mechanism with increased efficiency.
In one embodiment, the invention concerns a mechanical isotropic harmonic oscillator comprising a two degree of freedom orbiting mass with respect to a fixed base with springs having isotropic and linear restoring force properties due to the intrinsic isotropy of matter.
In one embodiment, the isotropic harmonic oscillator may comprise a number of isotropic linear springs arranged to yield a two degree of freedom orbiting mass with respect to a fixed base.
In one embodiment, the isotropic harmonic oscillator may comprise a spherical mass with a number of equatorial springs.
In another embodiment, the isotropic harmonic oscillator may comprise a spherical mass with a polar spring.
In one embodiment, the mechanism may comprise two isotropic harmonic oscillators coupled by a shaft so as to balance linear accelerations.
In one embodiment, the mechanism may comprise two isotropic harmonic oscillators coupled by a shaft so as to balance angular accelerations.
In one embodiment, the mechanism may comprise a variable radius crank which rotates about a fixed frame through a pivot and a prismatic joint which allows the crank extremity to rotate with a variable radius.
In one embodiment, the mechanism may comprise a fixed frame holding a crankshaft on which a maintaining torque M is applied, a crank which is attached to a crankshaft and equipped with a prismatic slot, wherein a rigid pin is fixed to the orbiting mass of the oscillator or oscillator system, wherein said pin engages in said slot.
In one embodiment, the mechanism may comprise a detent escapement a for intermittent mechanical energy supply to the oscillator.
In one embodiment, the detent escapement comprises two parallel catches which are fixed to the orbiting mass, whereby one catch displaces a detent which pivots on a spring to releases an escape wheel, and whereby said escape wheel impulses on the other catch thereby restoring lost energy to the oscillator or oscillator system.
In one embodiment, the invention concerns a timekeeper such as a clock comprising an oscillator or an oscillator system as defined in the present application.
In one embodiment, the timekeeper is a wristwatch.
In one embodiment, the oscillator or oscillator system defined in the present application is used as a time base for a chronograph measuring fractions of seconds requiring only an extended speed multiplicative gear train, for example to obtain 100 Hz frequency so as to measure 1/100th of a second.
In one embodiment, the oscillator or oscillator system defined in the present application is used as speed regulator for striking or musical clocks and watches, as well as music boxes, thus eliminating unwanted noise and decreasing energy consumption, and also improving musical or striking rhythm stability. These embodiments and others will be described in more detail in the following description of the invention.
The present invention will be better understood from the following description and from the drawings which show
2 Conceptual Basis of the Invention
2.1 Newton's Isochronous Solar System
As is well-known, in 1687 Isaac Newton published Principia Mathematica in which he proved Kepler's laws of planetary motion, in particular, the First Law which states that planets move in ellipses with the Sun at one focus and the Third Law which states that the square of the orbital period of a planet is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit, see reference [19].
Less well-known is that in Book I, Proposition X, of the same work, he showed that if the inverse square law of attraction (see
Newton's result for Hooke's Law is very easily verified: Consider a point mass moving in two dimensions subject to a central force
F(r)=−k r
centered at the origin, where r is the position of the mass, then for an object of mass m, this has solution
(A1 sin(ω0t+ϕ1),A2 sin(ω0t+ϕ2)),
for constants A1, A2, ϕ1, ϕ2 depending on initial conditions and frequency
This not only shows that orbits are elliptical, but that the period of motion depends only on the mass m and the rigidity k of the central force. This model therefore displays isochronism since the period
is independent of the position and momentum of the point mass (the analogue of Kepler's Third Law proved by Newton).
2.2 Implementation as a Time Base for a Timekeeper
Isochronism means that this oscillator is a good candidate to be a time base for a timekeeper as a possible embodiment of the present invention.
This has not been previously done or mentioned in the literature and the utilization of this oscillator as a time base is an embodiment of the present invention.
Despite being known since 1687 and its theoretical simplicity, it would seem that the isotropic harmonic oscillator has never been previously used as a time base for a watch or clock, and this requires explanation. In the following, we will use the term “isotropic oscillator” to mean “isotropic harmonic oscillator.”
It would seem that the main reason is the fixation on constant speed mechanisms such as governors or speed regulators, and a limited view of the conical pendulum as a constant speed mechanism.
For example, in his description of the conical pendulum which has the potential to approximate isochronism, Leopold Defossez states its application to measuring very small intervals of time, much smaller than its period, see reference [8, p. 534].
H. Bouasse devotes a chapter of his book to the conical pendulum including its approximate isochronism, see reference [3, Chapitre VIII]. He devotes a section of this chapter on the utilization of the conical pendulum to measure fractions of seconds (he assumes a period of 2 seconds), stating that this method appears perfect. He then qualifies this by noting the difference between average precision and instantaneous precision and admits that the conical pendulum's rotation may not be constant over small intervals due to difficulties in adjusting the mechanism. Therefore, he considers variations within a period as defects of the conical pendulum which implies that he considers that it should, under perfect conditions, operate at constant speed.
Similarly, in his discussion of continuous versus intermittent motion, Rupert Gould overlooks the isotropic harmonic oscillator and his only reference to a continuous motion timekeeper is the Villarceau regulator which he states: “seems to have given good results. But it is not probable that was more accurate than an ordinary good-quality driving clock or chronograph,” see reference [9, 20-21]. Gould's conclusion is validated by the Villarceau regulator data given by Breguet, see reference [4].
From the theoretical standpoint, there is the very influential paper of James Clerk Maxwell On Governors, which is considered one of the inspirations for modern control theory, see reference [18].
Moreover, isochronism requires a true oscillator which must preserve all speed variations. The reason is that the wave equation
preserves all initial conditions by propagating them. Thus, a true oscillator must keep a record of all its speed perturbation. For this reason, the invention described here allows maximum amplitude variation to the oscillator.
This is exactly the opposite of a governor which must attenuate these perturbations. In principle, one could obtain isotropic oscillators by eliminating the damping mechanisms leading to speed regulation.
The conclusion is that the isotropic oscillator has not been used as a time base because there seems to have been a conceptual block assimilating isotropic oscillators with governors, overlooking the simple remark that accurate timekeeping only requires a constant time over a single complete period and not over all smaller intervals.
We maintain that this oscillator is completely different in theory and function from the conical pendulum and governors, see hereunder in the present description.
2.3 Rotational Versus Translational, Versus Tilting Orbiting Motion
Two types of isotropic harmonic oscillators having unidirectional motion are possible. One is to take a linear spring with body at its extremity, and rotate the spring and body around a fixed center. This is illustrated in
This leads to the body rotating around its center of mass with one full turn per revolution around the orbit as illustrated in
This type of spring will be called a rotational isotropic oscillator and will be described in Section 4.1. In this case, the moment of inertia of the body affects the dynamics, as the body is rotating around itself.
Another possible realization has the mass supported by a central isotropic spring, as described in Section 4.2. In this case, this leads to the body having no rotation around its center of mass, and we call this orbiting by translation. This is illustrated in
In this case, the moment of inertia of the mass does not affect the dynamics. Tilting motion will occur in the mechanisms described below.
Another possibility is tilting motion where a limited range angular pivoting movement occurs, but not full rotations around the center of gravity of the body. Tilting motion is shown in
This produces orbiting by translation as can be seen by fixing on the oscillating mass 892 a rigid pole 893 with a fixed pointer 894 at its extremity. The orbit by translation is verified by the constant orientation of the pointer which is always in the direction 895.
2.4 Integration of the Isotropic Harmonic Oscillator in a Standard Mechanical Movement
Our time base using an isotropic oscillator will regulate a mechanical timekeeper, and this can be implemented by simply replacing the balance wheel and spiral spring oscillator with the isotropic oscillator and the escapement with a crank fixed to the last wheel of the gear train. This is illustrated in
3 Theoretical Requirements of the Physical Realization
In order to realize an isotropic harmonic oscillator, in accordance with the present invention, there requires a physical construction of the central restoring force. The theory of a mass moving with respect to a central restoring force is such that the resulting motion lies in a plane, however, we examine here more general isotropic harmonic oscillator where perfectly planar motion is not respected, but, the mechanism will still retain the desirable features of a harmonic oscillator.
In order for the physical realization to produce isochronous orbits for a time base, the theoretical model of Section 2 above must be adhered to as closely as possible. The spring stiffness k is independent of direction and is a constant, that is, independent of radial displacement (linear spring). In theory, there is a point mass, which therefore has moment of inertia J=0 when not rotating. The reduced mass m is isotropic and also independent of displacement. The resulting mechanism should be insensitive to gravity and to linear and angular shocks. The conditions are therefore
Isotropy will be realized through radially symmetric springs which are isotropic spring due to the isotropy of matter. The simplest example is shown in
One can modify this construction of
A more planar motion can be achieved as shown in
A perfectly planar motion can be achieved by doubling the mechanism of
One can also use a membrane which provides an isotropic restoring force due to the isotropy of matter, as shown in
4.2 Isotropy Via a Combination of Non-Symmetric Springs.
It is possible to obtain an isotropic spring by combining springs in such a way that the combined restoring force is isotropic.
A cross-section of
The mechanisms of
An alternate dumbbell design in given in
4.3 Isotropic Harmonic Oscillators with Spherical Mass
A design with a spherical mass is presented in
An alternate sphere mechanism is given in
A rigid pin 808 is fixed to 807 on the axis of 811. The tip 812 of pin 808 has a spherical shape. As 807 oscillates around its neutral position, the tip of pin 808 follows a continuous trajectory called the orbit (labeled 810 on the figures).
The tip 812 of the pin engages into a slot 813 machined into the driving crank 814 whose rotation axis is collinear with the axis of rod 811. As a driving torque is applied onto 814, the crank pushes 812 forward along its orbiting trajectory, thus maintaining the mechanism into continuous motion, even in the presence of mechanical losses (damping effects). Its properties are
An alternate embodiment of a sphere mechanism is given in
The crank wheel 950 receives the driving torque. The shaft 951 of the crank wheel is guided by a rotational bearing 969 turning about axis 953, to the fixed base 952. A flexure pivot 954, turns about axis 955 which is perpendicular to axis 953, and connects the shaft 951 to a body 956. The body 956 is connected to body 958 by a flexure structure 957 having two degrees of freedom: one translational degree of freedom along the axis 963 and one rotational degree of freedom around the axis 963. In addition to this kinematic function, flexure 957 provides the elastic restoring force function of the spring 927 of
4.4 XY Translational Isotropic Harmonic Oscillators
It is possible to construct isotropic harmonic oscillators using orthogonal translational springs in the XY plane. However, these constructions will not be considered here and are the subject of a co-pending application.
5 Compensation Mechanisms
In order to place the new oscillator in a portable timekeeper as an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, it is necessary to address forces that could influence the correct functioning of the oscillator. These include gravity and shocks.
5.1 Compensation for Gravity
For a portable timekeeper, compensation is required.
This can be achieved by making a copy of the oscillator and connecting both copies through a ball or universal joint. This is shown in
Another method for copying and balancing oscillators is shown in
5.2 Dynamical Balancing for Linear Acceleration
Linear shocks are a form of linear acceleration, so include gravity as a special case. Thus, the mechanism of
5.3 Dynamical Balancing for Angular Acceleration
Effects due to angular accelerations can be minimized by reducing the distance between the centers of gravity of the two masses. This only takes into account angular accelerations will all possible axes of rotation, except those on the axis of rotation of our oscillators.
This is achieved in the mechanism of
6 Maintaining and Counting
Oscillators lose energy due to friction, so there needs a method to maintain oscillator energy. There must also be a method for counting oscillations in order to display the time kept by the oscillator. In mechanical clocks and watches, this has been achieved by the escapement which is the interface between the oscillator and the rest of the timekeeper. The principle of an escapement is illustrated in
In the case of the present invention, two main methods are proposed to achieve this: without an escapement and with a simplified escapement.
6.1 Mechanisms without Escapement
In order to maintain energy to the isotropic harmonic oscillator, a torque or a force are applied, see
6.2 Simplified Escapements
The advantage of using an escapement is that the oscillator will not be continuously in contact with the energy source (via the gear train) which can be a source of chronometric error. The escapements will therefore be free escapements in which the oscillator is left to vibrate without disturbance from the escapement for a significant portion of its oscillation.
The escapements are simplified compared to balance wheel escapements since the oscillator is turning in a single direction. Since a balance wheel has a back and forth motion, watch escapements generally require a lever in order to impulse in one of the two directions.
The first watch escapement which directly applies to our oscillator is the chronometer or detent escapement [6, 224-233]. This escapement can be applied in either spring detent or pivoted detent form without any modification other than eliminating passing spring whose function occurs during the opposite rotation of the ordinary watch balance wheel, see [6,
H. Bouasse describes a detent escapement for the conical pendulum [3, 247-248] with similarities to the one presented here. However, Bouasse considers that it is a mistake to apply intermittent impulse to the conical pendulum. This could be related to his assumption that the conical pendulum should always operate at constant speed, as explained above.
6.3 Improvement of the Detent Escapement for the Isotropic Oscillator
Embodiments of possible detent escapements for the isotropic harmonic oscillator are shown in
7 Difference with Previous Mechanisms
7.1 Difference with the Conical Pendulum
The conical pendulum is a pendulum rotating around a vertical axis, that is, perpendicular to the force of gravity, see
However, as with cycloidal cheeks for the ordinary pendulum, Huygens' modification is based on a flexible pendulum and in practice does not improve timekeeping. The conical pendulum has never been used as a timebase for a precision clock.
Despite its potential for accurate timekeeping, the conical pendulum has been consistently described as a method for obtaining uniform motion in order to measure small time intervals accurately, for example, by Defossez in his description of the conical pendulum see reference [8, p. 534].
Theoretical analysis of the conical pendulum has been given by Haag see reference [11] [12, p. 199-201] with the conclusion that its potential as a timebase is intrinsically worse than the circular pendulum due to its inherent lack of isochronism.
The conical pendulum has been used in precision clocks, but never as a time base. In particular, in the 1860's, William Bond constructed a precision clock having a conical pendulum, but this was part of the escapement, the timebase being a circular pendulum see references [10] and [25, p. 139-143].
Our invention is therefore a superior to the conical pendulum as choice of time base because our oscillator has inherent isochronism. Moreover, our invention can be used in a watch or other portable timekeeper, as it is based on a spring, whereas this is impossible for the conical pendulum which depends on the timekeeper having constant orientation with respect to gravity.
7.2 Difference with Governors
Governors are mechanisms which maintain a constant speed, the simplest example being the Watt governor for the steam engine. In the 19th Century, these governors were used in applications where smooth operation, that is, without the stop and go intermittent motion of a clock mechanism based on an oscillator with escapement, was more important than high precision. In particular, such mechanisms were required for telescopes in order to follow the motion of the celestial sphere and track the motion of stars over relatively short intervals of time. High chronometric precision was not required in these cases due to the short time interval of use.
An example of such a mechanism was built by Antoine Breguet, see reference [4], to regulate the Paris Observatory telescope and the theory was described by Yvon Villarceau, see reference [24], it is based on a Watt governor and is also intended to maintain a relatively constant speed, so despite being called a regulateur isochrone (isochronous governor), it cannot be a true isochronous oscillator as described above. According to Breguet, the precision was between 30 seconds/day and 60 seconds/day, see reference [4].
Due to the intrinsic properties of harmonic oscillators following from the wave equation, see Section 8, constant speed mechanisms are not true oscillators and all such mechanisms have intrinsically limited chronometric precision.
Governors have been used in precision clocks, but never as the time base. In particular, in 1869 William Thomson, Lord Kelvin, designed and built an astronomical clock whose escapement mechanism was based on a governor, though the time base was a pendulum, see references [23][21, p. 133-136] [25, p. 144-149]. Indeed, the title of his communication regarding the clock states that it features “uniform motion”, see reference [23], so is clearly distinct in its purpose from the present invention.
7.3 Difference with Other Continuous Motion Timekeepers
There have been at least two continuous motion wristwatches in which the mechanism does not have intermittent stop & go motion so does not suffer from needless repeated accelerations. The two examples are the so-called Salto watch by Asulab, see reference [2], and Spring Drive by Seiko, see reference [22]. While both these mechanism attain a high level of chronometric precision, they are completely different from the present invention as they do not use an isotropic oscillator as a time base and instead rely on the oscillations of a quartz tuning fork. Moreover, this tuning fork requires piezoelectricity to maintain and count oscillations and an integrated circuit to control maintenance and counting. The continuous motion of the movement is only possible due to electromagnetic braking which is once again controlled by the integrated circuit which also requires a buffer of up to ±12 seconds in its memory in order to correct chronometric errors due to shock.
Our invention uses an isotropic oscillator as time base and does not require electricity or electronics in order to operate correctly. The continuous motion of the movement is regulated by the isotropic oscillator itself and not by an integrated circuit.
8 Realization of an Isotropic Harmonic Oscillator
In some embodiments some already discussed above and detailed hereunder, the present invention was conceived as a realization of the isotropic harmonic oscillator for use as a time base. Indeed, in order to realize the isotropic harmonic oscillator as a time base, there requires a physical construction of the central restoring force. One first notes that the theory of a mass moving with respect to a central restoring force is such that the resulting motion lies in a plane. It follows that for practical reasons, that the physical construction should realize planar isotropy. Therefore, the constructions described here will mostly be of planar isotropy, but not limited to this, and there will also be an example of 3-dimensional isotropy. Planar isotropy can be realized in two ways: rotational isotropic springs and translational isotropic springs.
Rotational isotropic springs have one degree of freedom and rotate with the support holding both the spring and the mass. This architecture leads naturally to isotropy. While the mass follows the orbit, it rotates about itself at the same angular velocity as the support
Translational isotropic springs have two translational degrees of freedom in which the mass does not rotate but translates along an elliptical orbit around the neutral point. This does away with spurious moment of inertia and removes the theoretical obstacle to isochronism.
Rotational isotropic springs will not be considered here, and the term “isotropic spring” refers only to translational isotropic springs.
17 Application to Accelerometers, Chronographs and Governors
By adding a radial display to isotropic spring embodiments described herein, the invention can constitute an entirely mechanical two degree-of-freedom accelerometer, for example, suitable for measuring lateral g forces in a passenger automobile.
In an another application, the oscillators and systems described in the present application may be used as a time base for a chronograph measuring fractions of seconds requiring only an extended speed multiplicative gear train, for example to obtain 100 Hz frequency so as to measure 1/100th of a second. Of course, other time interval measurement is possible and the gear train final ratio may be adapted in consequence.
In a further application, the oscillator described herein may be used as a speed governor where only constant average speed over small intervals is required, for example, to regulate striking or musical clocks and watches, as well as music boxes. The use of a harmonic oscillator, as opposed to a frictional governor, means that friction is minimized and quality factor optimized thus minimizing unwanted noise, decreasing energy consumption and therefore energy storage, and in a striking or musical watch application, thereby improving musical or striking rhythm stability.
The flexible elements of the mechanisms are preferably made out of elastic material such as steel, titanium alloys, aluminum alloys, bronze alloys, silicon (monocrystalline or polycrystalline), silicon-carbide, polymers or composites. The massive parts of the mechanisms are preferably made out of high density materials such as steel, copper, gold, tungsten or platinum. Other equivalent materials are of course possible as well as mix of said materials for the realization of the elements of the present invention.
The embodiments given herein are for illustrative purposes and should not be construed in a limiting manner. Many variants are possible within the scope of the present invention, for example by using equivalent means. Also, different embodiments described herein may be combined as desired, according to circumstances.
Further, other applications for the oscillator may be envisaged within the scope and spirit of the present invention and it is not limited to the several ones described herein.
Main Features and Advantages of Some Embodiments of the Present Invention
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14150939 | Jan 2014 | EP | regional |
14173947 | Jun 2014 | EP | regional |
14183385 | Sep 2014 | EP | regional |
14183624 | Sep 2014 | EP | regional |
14195719 | Dec 2014 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2015/050243 | 1/13/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/104693 | 7/16/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1595169 | Schieferstein | Aug 1926 | A |
1919796 | Marrison | Jul 1933 | A |
3069572 | Dick | Dec 1962 | A |
3269106 | Ceh | Aug 1966 | A |
3318087 | Favre | May 1967 | A |
3469462 | Steinemann et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3528308 | Favre | Sep 1970 | A |
3540208 | Kock | Nov 1970 | A |
3546925 | Barton | Dec 1970 | A |
3635013 | Bertsch | Jan 1972 | A |
4127986 | Nozawa | Dec 1978 | A |
5872417 | Sugaya | Feb 1999 | A |
7522478 | Moteki | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7963693 | Genequand | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20020191493 | Hara | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030196490 | Cardarelli | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050007888 | Jolidon | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070240509 | Uchiyama | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080008052 | Moteki | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100207488 | Ting | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20130279302 | Vardi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140290019 | Nakamura | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160179058 | Born | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160223989 | Winkler | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160327908 | Winkler | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160327910 | Henein | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344368 | Ayazi | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
113025 | Dec 1925 | CH |
911067 | Jun 1969 | CH |
481411 | Dec 1969 | CH |
512757 | May 1971 | CH |
2354226 | May 1975 | DE |
73414 | Dec 1866 | FR |
1457957 | Nov 1966 | FR |
240505 | Sep 1925 | GB |
2005-181318 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-526958 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2008-020211 | Jan 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
European Search Opinion dated May 27, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report dated May 27, 2015. |
International Search Report of PCT/IB2015/050243 dated Oct. 21, 2015. |
Partial European Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2014. |
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority dated Oct. 21, 2015. |
Hall, R.W. and Josic, K., “Planetary motion and the duality of force laws,” SIAM review, 42(1), pp. 115-124, 2000. |
Yvon Villarceau, “Sur les regulateurs isochrones, derives du systeme de Watt,” Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, 1872, pp. 1437-1445. |
Henein, S. and Vardi, I., “Une horlogerie mécanique sans tic-tac,” Pour la Science, Apr. 2017, No. 474, pp. 48-54. |
Li, Y. eet al. “A compliant parallel XY micromotion stage with complete kinematic decoupling.” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 9(3), pp. 538-553, 2012. |
Li, Y. et al., “Design of a new decoupled XY flexure parallel kinematic manipulator with actuator isolation.” Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 470-475. |
Nakayama, K., “A new method of determining the primary position of the eye using Listing's law.” Am J Optom Physiol Opt, 55, pp. 331-336, 1978. |
Rubbert, L., Bitterli, R., Ferrier, N., Fifanski, S., Vardi, I. and Henein, S. “Isotropic springs based on parallel flexure stages.” Precision Engineering, 43, pp. 132-145, 2016. |
Simon Henein, “L'oscillateur IsoSpring,” Dec. 2016. |
Vardi, I., Rubbert, L., Bitterli, R., Ferrier, N., Kahrobaiyan, M., Nussbaumer, B. and Henein, S. “Theory and design of spherical oscillator mechanisms,” Precision Engineering, 51, pp. 499-513, 2018. |
Antoine Breguet, Régulateur isochrone de M. Yvon Villarceau, La Nature 1876 (premier semestre), pp. 187-190. |
Chrystiaan Huygens, “The Pendulum Clock or Geometrical Demonstrations Concerning the Motionof Pendula As Applied to Clocks,” Rerpint by The Iowa State Press in 1986, translated by Richard Blackwell, 1673. |
Henein, S. et al., “IsoSpring: vers la montre sans échappement.” In Journée d'étude de la Société Suisse de Chronométrie (No. EPFL-TALK-201790), 2014. |
Maxwell, J.C., “On governors,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 16, pp. 270-283, 1868. |
Jules Haag, “Les mouvements vibratoires,” Tome second, Presses Universitaires de France, 1955. |
Jules Haag, “Sur le pendule conique,” Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 1947, pp. 1234-1236. |
First Office Action from the Russian Federal Institute of Industrial Property dated Jun. 25, 2018 with the App. No. 2016130168/28 (046989) and English Translation. |
First Office Action from the Russian Federal Institute of Industrial Property dated Jun. 28, 2018 with the App. No. 2016130167/28 (046988) and English Translation. |
First Office Action from the USPTO dated Jun. 26, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/109,821. |
First Office Action of a related Chinese Patent Application with the Serial No. 201580013818.X, dated May 30, 2018 and English Translation. |
First Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2018 from the Japanese Patent Office for the Japanese Patent Application JP2016-563280 and English translation. |
International Search Report of PCT/IB2015/050242 dated Nov. 25, 2015. |
Larry L. Howell, Compliant Mechanisms, John Wiley Sons, Inc., 2001, ISBN 0-471-38478-X, Abstract. |
Partial European Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2014 of EPO Application 14173947.4. |
Second Office Action from the USPTO dated Jan. 23, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/109,821. |
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority dated Nov. 25, 2015 for PCT/IB2015/05242. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160327909 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |