Generating dolly zoom effect using light field image data

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10594945
  • Patent Number
    10,594,945
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 3, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 17, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A sensor is configured to acquire a light field by imaging a scene. A processor is configured to determine four-dimensional (4D) coordinates of points in a light field and generate dollied coordinates from the 4D coordinates based on a dolly transform and a dolly parameter. The processor is also configured to project rays associated with the dollied coordinates from the light field onto corresponding points in an output raster. In some cases, the processor applies an aperture function to filter the rays in the coordinate system of the dollied coordinates. The aperture function has a first value in a first region of an aperture plane and the aperture value has a second value in a second region of the aperture plane. Rays passing through the first region are accepted by the aperture function and rays passing through the second region are rejected.
Description
BACKGROUND

A light field camera, also known as a plenoptic camera, captures information about the light field emanating from a scene; that is, the intensity of light in a scene, and also the direction that the light rays are traveling in space. This contrasts with a conventional camera, which records only light intensity. One type of light field camera uses an array of micro-lenses placed in front of an otherwise conventional image sensor to sense intensity, color, and directional information. Multi-camera arrays are another type of light field camera.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure may be better understood, and its numerous features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items



FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a dolly zoom effect according to some embodiments.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of dolly-zoom as a coordinate transformation according to some embodiments.



FIG. 3 is an illustration of a dolly-zoom as a transformation of the light field according to some embodiments.



FIG. 4 illustrates a “dolly twirl” analogous to the dolly zoom of FIG. 2 according to some embodiments.



FIGS. 5 and 6 show examples of opposite extremes of a dolly-zoom action according to some embodiments.



FIGS. 7 and 8 show examples of opposite extremes of a dolly-twirl action according to some embodiments.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an architecture of a light field capture device such as a camera according to some embodiments.



FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an architecture of a light field capture system according to some embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Light fields can be manipulated to computationally reproduce various elements of image capture. One example is refocusing, which is equivalent to a virtual motion of the sensor plane. As described herein, virtual motion of the main lens plane is also possible, resulting in a dolly zoom effect in which a field-of-view is modified while a camel location moves towards or away from a subject in a manner that maintains a size of the subject in the frame. The dolly zoom effect was first used to portray James Stewart's fear of heights in the film Vertigo and is also well known for its use portraying Roy Scheider's anxiety in the film Jaws. Existing techniques to create a dolly zoom effect rely on the use of a depth map during 2D reconstruction. This requirement of an accurate depth map limits the robustness and applicability of the dolly-zoom effect.


Some embodiments of the light field are represented as a four-dimensional (4D) function that can be formed of two-dimensional (2D) images of a portion of a scene. The images represent views of the portions of the scene from different perspectives and frames are rendered from the point of view of the camera by sampling portions of the 2D images. For example, the coordinates (u, v, s, t) in the 4D function that represents the light field can be defined so that (u, v) represent coordinates within one of the camera images in the light field and (s, t) are coordinates of pixels within the camera image. Other definitions of the four coordinates of the 4D function that represents the light field can also be used.


According to various embodiments, a dolly zoom effect can be applied directly to the light field as a 4D transformation of some or all of the coordinates (u, v, s, t) that are used to define locations in the 4D light field. Using the techniques described herein, explicit depth calculations are not required, allowing the approach to be robustly applied to any light field. Furthermore, the techniques described herein do not require 2D reconstruction, thus allowing the full 4D light field to be dollied, for example for applications such as light field displays.


The described techniques can be implemented as a 4D transformation of the light field, and can easily be combined with other transformations, such as refocus, to create various effects.


Basic Dolly Zoom Equation


A simple version of the dolly zoom equation can be derived analogously to the refocus equation. For this derivation we reduce the light field to 2D without loss of generality.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example 100 of a dolly zoom effect according to some embodiments. The s coordinate denotes position on the sensor 105, while the u coordinate denotes position on the aperture 110. Three rays 111, 112, 113 (collectively referred to herein as “the rays 111-113”) are shown to pass through a location on the aperture 110 (not necessarily at the origin of the coordinate system used in the plane of the aperture 110) and hit the sensor 105.


A virtual aperture 120 is dollied a distance d relative to the plane of the aperture 110. From simple geometry it is apparent that the locations where the rays 111-113 intersect the virtual aperture 120 change proportionally to the slope of the rays 111-113 and d. Thus, the location where one of the rays 111-113 intersects the virtual aperture 120 is:

u′=u+k·s·d


where k is a normalization constant such that k*s is the slope of the ray.


In some embodiments, the values of k and d our combined into a single constant γ.


Thus, the light field transformation can be expressed as:







[




s







u











]

=


[



1


0




γ


1



]



[



s




u



]






or for the full 4D transform the light field is represented as:







[




s







t







u







v











]

=


[



1


0


0


0




0


1


0


0




γ


0


1


0




0


γ


0


1



]



[



s




t




u




v



]






Mathematically this transformation skews the light field along the uv plane. Intuitively, this skewing of the light field along the uv plane can be thought of as introducing a perspective shift that is proportional to the st location. An object's motion with a perspective shift is proportional to its depth, which can be interpreted as a depth dependent scaling. However, there is no need for the depth to be explicitly calculated.


Thinking of this dolly action as a depth-dependent scaling reveals that, for objects at the focus position (lambda 0), no scaling occurs. This can be thought of as a counter zoom being applied in order to keep apparent size the same for objects at the focus distance. Thus this transform simultaneously dollies and zooms the light field image.


Example Implementation


In at least one embodiment, a dolly zoom effect is implemented using the light field projection method of 2D reconstruction as follows:

    • 1. A 4D coordinate (s, t, u, v) is accessed or calculated for each point in the light field.
    • 2. Given a dolly parameter γ, the dollied coordinate (s′, t′, u′, v′) is determined using the above equation, i.e. s′=s, t′=t, u′=u+γs, v′=v+γt
    • 3. An aperture function α(u, v) is accessed or generated. In the illustrated embodiment, the aperture function has a value of 1 where the aperture accepts rays and 0 where the aperture rejects rays. However, in other embodiments, the aperture function is implemented using other values or methods of representation.
      • a. Some embodiments of a circular aperture with radius r have a value of the aperture function α(u, v) equal to 1 when u2+v2<r2 and 0 otherwise. The natural fully open aperture would have r=0.5
      • b. The transformation of u′ and v′ effectively shifts the center of the aperture. A somewhat smaller aperture than full open can be used, so as to avoid the aperture function going out of bounds of the actual data, as shown in FIG. 2.
      • 4. If the aperture function α(u′, v′) accepts the ray, then the light field ray is projected to point (x, y)=(s′, t′) on the output raster.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of dolly-zoom as a coordinate transformation according to some embodiments. From left to right, there is shown: the original light field 200, the light field with negative dolly-zoom 205, and the light field with positive dolly-zoom 210. The center (uv) location of each st cell changes.


In the example of FIG. 2, the above-described method is illustrated using a 3×3 light field. Each cell represents an (s, t) coordinate, while the coordinate within each cell represents (u, v). The central point 215 (only one indicated by a reference numeral in the interest of clarity) within each cell is the center of the (u, v) coordinate system. The gray areas represent valid data within the light field. The circle 220 (only one indicated by a reference numeral in the interest of clarity) represents the aperture function that is used in the above algorithm, which as noted above is smaller than the full size of the captured data.


The illustrations are examples only, and do not imply any particular method of light field capture. However, in some embodiments, a plenoptic camera with a 3×3 microlens array is used to capture the light field. In such a case, each microlens would be the (s, t) location, and within each microlens is a (u, v) coordinate system centered on the red x.



FIG. 2 illustrates an intuitive interpretation that dolly-zoom produces a spatially varying perspective shift. The virtual aperture, a.k.a. the aperture function, undergoes a perspective shift that is proportional to its (s, t) location, thus producing depth-dependent scaling in the 2D reconstructed image. This can be visualized as the scaling of the grid formed by the central points 215. As mentioned above, since the virtual aperture is being shifted, the virtual aperture is oriented or sized so that it overlaps with valid data. This also means a smaller virtual aperture will allow for more dolly-zoom.



FIG. 3 is an illustration of a dolly-zoom as a transformation of the light field according to some embodiments. From left to right, there is shown: the original light field 300, the light field with negative dolly-zoom 305, and the light field with positive dolly-zoom 310. The coordinate system is the same throughout, but the underlying light field is transformed. The central point 315 (only one indicated by a reference numeral in the interest of clarity) within each cell is the center of the (u, v) coordinate system. The gray areas represent valid data within the light field. The circle 320 (only one indicated by a reference numeral in the interest of clarity) represents the aperture function that could be used in the above algorithm, which as noted above is smaller than the full size of the captured data.



FIG. 3 thus illustrates the mathematical equivalent of performing a transformation on the underlying light field data (perhaps using some sort of interpolation) instead of shifting the virtual apertures.


None of the above is to imply that an aperture function is needed or that 2D reconstruction is necessary. The use of the aperture function in the above figures is merely to illustrate the effect the dolly-zoom would have in the example 2D reconstruction algorithm. Other 2D reconstruction methods may be used that do not utilize an aperture, and 2D reconstruction is not even necessary if method is applied as a 4D transform of the light field. The 4D light field itself may be modified, either by changing the coordinate mapping as in FIG. 2, or by transformation of the underlying data as in FIG. 3, and then stored for future processing.



FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate two different approaches that are useful in different situations. The first approach (FIG. 2) is useful in cases where light field data is irregularly gridded, or in other cases where explicit coordinates of each light field point are known and/or preferred. The modified light field coordinates are then fed to downstream processing, such as for example projection for 2D reconstruction. The second approach (FIG. 3) is useful in cases of where light field data is regularly gridded, or in other cases where the light field coordinates are implicitly known. The underlying data is modified and passed onto downstream processing. This can be useful in the case of a light field display, for example. In the second case, the data may be modified such that the data ends up outside of the original implicit grid, as shown in FIG. 3. This can be compensated for by padding the original data before transformation.


Composing Multiple Transforms


For illustrative purposes, and without loss of generality, the technique of combining multiple transforms is described in terms of a 2D light field.


Since dolly zoom is mathematically a linear transform, it can be combined with other linear transforms by matrix multiplication. For example, refocus and dolly zoom operations can be combined by using one of two transforms:







[




s







u











]

=




[



1


λ




0


1



]



[



1


0




γ


1



]




[



s




u



]


=




[




1
+

λ





γ




λ




γ


1



]



[



s




u



]






[




s







u











]

=




[



1


0




γ


1



]



[



1


λ




0


1



]




[



s




u



]


=


[



1


λ




γ



1
+

λ





γ





]



[



s




u



]









The two transformations are not equivalent because composing transformations is not a commutative operation. Depending on the effect one wishes to achieve, the order of composition must be carefully selected.


In order to implement this in the previous example algorithm, step 2 can be modified in one of two ways.














Dolly First:








2.1
First modify the (u, v) coordinates as u′ = u + γs, v′ = v + γt


2.2
Then modify the (s, t) coordinates as s′ = s + λu′, t′ = t + λv′


2.2.1
Alternatively, modify the (s, t) coordinates at the same time as



2.1, as per the above equations



s′ = s(1 + λγ) + λu, t′ = t(1 + λγ) + λv







Refocus First:








2.1
First modify the (s, t) coordinates as s′ = s + λu, t′ = t + λv


2.2
Then modify the (u, v) coordinates as u′ = u + γs′, v′ = v + γt′


2.2.1
Alternatively, modify the (u, v) coordinates at the same time as



2.1, as per the above equations



u′ = u(1 + λγ) + γs, v′ = v(1 + λγ) + γt









One might be tempted to try to refocus and dolly simultaneously by using the following transform:







[




s







u











]

=


[



1


λ




γ


1



]



[



s




u



]






However this is not a valid coordinate transform. In particular it is possible to select λ and γ such that the matrix is singular and thus not invertible.


More complicated compositions can be used as well. For example:







[




s







u











]

=




[



1



λ
2





0


1



]



[



1


0




γ


1



]




[



1



λ
1





0


1



]




[



s




u



]






One use of this composition is to execute a dolly zoom where the constant-size depth is at a different depth than lambda zero. In this case, the first refocus effectively changes the zero lambda depth, the dolly zoom occurs, and then the second refocus undoes the first refocus. The second refocus is not simply the inverse of the first refocus (since the dolly action remaps the refocus depths), but this could be a good first approximation. Exact relations may be derived so to have the refocuses exactly cancel out.


Certain compositions of transforms may be expressed as other transforms as well. In some embodiments, the above composition is utilized with the values:







λ
1

=


λ
2

=

-

tan


(

θ
2

)










γ
=

sin


(
θ
)






In that case, the transformation is equivalent to rotating the light field in the epipolar plane







[




s







u











]

=


[




cos





θ




sin





θ







-
sin






θ




cos





θ




]



[



s




u



]






Rotation by shearing is described, for example, in A. W. Paeth, A Fast Algorithm for General Raster Rotation, Computer Graphics Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, 1986.


Spatially Varying Transform


Neither the refocus parameter λ nor the dolly zoom parameter γ is required to be constant. Some embodiments of the refocus parameter λ or the dolly zoom parameter γ vary as a function of (s, t, u, v), or even (s′, t′, u′, v′). For example, the dolly zoom parameter γ can vary as a function of (u, v) and the refocus parameter λ can vary as a function of (s, t). If γ(u,v) is a planar function, this mimics the physical action of tilting the lens. This is analogous to how sensor tilt can be mimicked by having λ(s, t) be a planar function.


One artistic effect is called “Lens Whacking”, which is achieved by shooting with the lens free floating from the body. This means that focus and tilt effects are achieved by the relative placement of the lens to the sensor. By utilizing the ability to virtually produce tilt in both the lens plane and aperture plane, lens whacking effects can be performed computationally in a light field.


Depth-Based Transformations


In at least one embodiment, the dolly zoom effect represents a depth-dependent scaling of the image. Thus, many 2D transforms can be generalized to be depth dependent. One possible way for linear transforms is to use the equation







[




s







t







u







v











]

=



[



1


0


0


0




0


1


0


0






t
11

-
1




t
12



1


0





t
21





t
22

-
1



0


1



]



[



s




t




u




v



]


=


[



I


0





T
-
I



I



]



[



s




t




u




v



]







Where the linear transform is described by






T
=

[




t
11




t
12






t
21




t
22




]





In this simple case where T is a scaling matrix,






T
=



[



s


0




0


s



]



T
-
I


=

[




s
-
1



0




0



s
-
1




]






It is apparent that this reduces to the dolly zoom equation in the case in which γ=s−1.


Another potentially interesting effect is rotation. In this case






T
=



[




cos





θ




sin





θ







-
sin






θ




cos





θ




]



T
-
I


=

[





cos





θ

-
1




sin





θ







-
sin






θ





cos





θ

-
1




]






Using a small angle approximation this can be further simplified to







[





cos





θ

-
1




sin





θ







-
sin






θ






cos





θ

-
1









]



[



0


θ





-
θ



0



]





Thus, the following transform produces a rotation in the image proportional to depth (“dolly twirl”):







[




s







t







u







v











]

=


[



1


0


0


0




0


1


0


0




0


θ


1


0





-
θ



0


0


1



]



[



s




t




u




v



]







FIG. 4 illustrates a “dolly twirl” analogous to the dolly zoom of FIG. 2 according to some embodiments. From left to right there is shown: the original light field 400, the light field with negative theta 405, and the light field with positive theta 410. The central point 415 (only one indicated by a reference numeral in the interest of clarity) within each cell is the center of the (u, v) coordinate system. The gray areas represent valid data within the light field. The circle 420 (only one indicated by a reference numeral in the interest of clarity) represents the aperture function that could be used in the above algorithm, which as noted above is smaller than the full size of the captured data. The center (uv) location 415 of each st cell changes.


This technique can be further generalized to higher order transforms. For any given 2D transform, the identity part can be removed, and the remainder applied to the uv coordinates. This can be used to create effects that are otherwise not possible to produce using traditional camera setups.


For example, lens distortion (barrel and pincushion) is modeled as a quadratic transformation, with barrel and pincushion having opposite effects. If this distortion is applied proportionally to depth, the result is an image that has pincushion distortion for near objects and barrel distortion for far objects, or vice versa. Other distortions, such as perspective distortion, can be applied in this depth dependent manner as well.


Image Examples



FIGS. 5 and 6 show examples 500, 600 of opposite extremes of a dolly-zoom action according to some embodiments.



FIGS. 7 and 8 show examples 700, 800 of opposite extremes of a dolly-twirl action according to some embodiments.


Image Data Acquisition Devices



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an architecture 900 of a light field capture device such as a camera according to some embodiments. The light field capture device is used to implement some embodiments of the techniques described herein. In the illustrated embodiment, the light field capture device includes a light field image data acquisition device 905 that is configured to capture images using optics 910, an image sensor 915, which is implemented using a plurality of individual sensors for capturing pixels, and a microlens array 920. Some embodiments of the optics 910 include an aperture 925 for allowing a selectable amount of light into the light field capture device and a main lens 930 for focusing light toward the microlens array 920. Some embodiments of the microlens array 920 are disposed or incorporated in the optical path of the light field capture device so as to facilitate acquisition, capture, sampling of, recording, or obtaining light field image data via the sensor 915.


The light field image data acquisition device 905 includes the user interface 935 for allowing a user to provide input for controlling the operation of the light field capture device for capturing, acquiring, storing, or processing image data. Control circuitry 940 is used to facilitate acquisition, sampling, recording, or obtaining light field image data. For example, the control circuitry 940 can manage or control (automatically or in response to user input) the acquisition time and, rated acquisition, sampling, capturing, recording, or obtaining light field image data. Memory 945 is used to store image data, such as output from the image sensor 915. The memory 945 is implemented as external or internal memory, which can be provided as a separate device or location relative to the light field capture device. For example, the light field capture device can store raw light field image data output by the image sensor 915, or a representation thereof, such as a compressed image data file.


Post-processing circuitry 950 in the light field image data acquisition device 905 is used to access or modify image data acquired by the image sensor 915. Some embodiments of the post-processing circuitry 950 are configured to create dolly zoom effects using the image data, as discussed herein. For example, the post-processing circuitry 950 can include one or more processors executing software stored in the memory 945 to access and modify image data stored in the memory 945 to produce dolly zoom effects in images captured by the image sensor 915.



FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an architecture 1000 of a light field capture system according to some embodiments. The light field capture device is used to implement some embodiments of the techniques described herein. Elements in FIG. 10 that are referenced using the same reference numerals as corresponding elements in FIG. 9 perform the same or similar functions as the corresponding elements in FIG. 9. The architecture 1000 shown in FIG. 10 differs from the architecture 900 shown in FIG. 9 because the light field image data acquisition device 905 is implemented separately from a postprocessing system 1005, which includes the memory 945, the post-processing circuitry 950, and the user interface 935. The light field image data acquisition device 905 provides image data 1010 to the postprocessing system 1005.


Refocus Analogies


The above-described techniques may, by analogy, be applied to light field refocus as well. For example, the refocus analogy of the dolly twirl effect would be:







[




s







t







u







v











]

=


[



1


0


0


φ




0


1



-
φ



0




0


0


1


0




0


0


0


1



]



[



s




t




u




v



]





Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: determining four-dimensional (4D) coordinates of points in a light field;generating dollied coordinates from the 4D coordinates based on a dolly transform and a dolly parameter;applying an aperture function to filter rays in the coordinate system of the dollied coordinates, wherein the aperture function has a first value in a first region of an aperture plane and the aperture value has a second value in a second region of the aperture plane such that rays passing through the first region are accepted by the aperture function and rays passing through the second region are rejected; andprojecting rays associated with the dollied coordinates from the light field onto corresponding points in an output raster.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein applying the aperture function to filter the rays in the coordinate system of the dollied coordinates comprises dollying a virtual aperture by a distance relative to the aperture plane.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein generating the dollied coordinates comprises applying a depth dependent dolly transformation to the 4D coordinates.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein dollying the virtual aperture produces a depth-dependent scaling of a two dimensional (2D) reconstructed image that is reconstructed from the light field.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: refocusing portions of the light field using a linear refocusing transform and a refocusing parameter.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the dollied coordinates comprises generating the dollied coordinates by applying a quadratic dolly transform.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the dollied coordinates comprises producing tilt in a lens plane and an aperture plane.
  • 8. An apparatus comprising: a sensor configured to acquire a light field by imaging a scene; anda processor configured to: determine four-dimensional (4D) coordinates of points in a light field;generate dollied coordinates from the 4D coordinates based on a dolly transform and a dolly parameter;apply an aperture function to filter rays in the coordinate system of the dollied coordinates, wherein the aperture function has a first value in a first region of an aperture plane and the aperture value has a second value in a second region of the aperture plane such that rays passing through the first region are accepted by the aperture function and rays passing through the second region are rejected; andproject rays associated with the dollied coordinates from the light field onto corresponding points in an output raster.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the processor is configured to dolly a virtual aperture by a distance relative to the aperture plane.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the processor is configured to apply a depth dependent dolly transformation to the 4D coordinates.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein dollying the virtual aperture produces a depth-dependent scaling of a two dimensional (2D) reconstructed image that is reconstructed from the light field.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the processor is configured to refocus portions of the light field using a linear refocusing transform and a refocusing parameter.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the processor is configured to generate the dollied coordinates by applying a quadratic dolly transform.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the processor is configured to tilt an image in a lens plane and an aperture plane applying the dolly transform.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/481,038 for “Generating Dolly Zoom Effect Using Light Field Image Data”, filed on Apr. 3, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference. The present application is related to U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/311,592 for “Generating Dolly Zoom Effect Using Light Field Image Data”, filed on Jun. 23, 2014, and issued on Mar. 3, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,971,625, which is incorporated herein by reference. The present application is related to U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 15/162,426 for “Phase Detection Autofocus Using Subaperture Images”, filed on May 23, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (528)
Number Name Date Kind
725567 Ives Apr 1903 A
4383170 Takagi et al. May 1983 A
4661986 Adelson Apr 1987 A
4694185 Weiss Sep 1987 A
4920419 Easterly Apr 1990 A
5076687 Adelson Dec 1991 A
5077810 D'Luna Dec 1991 A
5157465 Kronberg Oct 1992 A
5251019 Moorman et al. Oct 1993 A
5282045 Mimura et al. Jan 1994 A
5499069 Griffith Mar 1996 A
5572034 Karellas Nov 1996 A
5610390 Miyano Mar 1997 A
5729471 Jain et al. Mar 1998 A
5748371 Cathey, Jr. et al. May 1998 A
5757423 Tanaka et al. May 1998 A
5818525 Elabd Oct 1998 A
5835267 Mason et al. Nov 1998 A
5907619 Davis May 1999 A
5949433 Klotz Sep 1999 A
5974215 Bilbro et al. Oct 1999 A
6005936 Shimizu et al. Dec 1999 A
6021241 Bilbro et al. Feb 2000 A
6023523 Cohen et al. Feb 2000 A
6028606 Kolb et al. Feb 2000 A
6034690 Gallery et al. Mar 2000 A
6061083 Aritake et al. May 2000 A
6061400 Pearlstein et al. May 2000 A
6069565 Stern et al. May 2000 A
6075889 Hamilton, Jr. et al. Jun 2000 A
6084979 Kanade et al. Jul 2000 A
6091860 Dimitri Jul 2000 A
6097394 Levoy et al. Aug 2000 A
6115556 Reddington Sep 2000 A
6137100 Fossum et al. Oct 2000 A
6169285 Pertrillo et al. Jan 2001 B1
6201899 Bergen Mar 2001 B1
6221687 Abramovich Apr 2001 B1
6320979 Melen Nov 2001 B1
6424351 Bishop et al. Jul 2002 B1
6448544 Stanton et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466207 Gortler et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476805 Shum et al. Nov 2002 B1
6479827 Hamamoto et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483535 Tamburrino et al. Nov 2002 B1
6529265 Henningsen Mar 2003 B1
6577342 Webster Jun 2003 B1
6587147 Li Jul 2003 B1
6597859 Leinhardt et al. Jul 2003 B1
6606099 Yamada Aug 2003 B2
6658168 Kim Dec 2003 B1
6674430 Kaufman et al. Jan 2004 B1
6687419 Atkin Feb 2004 B1
6768980 Meyer et al. Jul 2004 B1
6785667 Orbanes et al. Aug 2004 B2
6833865 Fuller et al. Dec 2004 B1
6842297 Dowski, Jr. et al. Jan 2005 B2
6900841 Mihara May 2005 B1
6924841 Jones Aug 2005 B2
6927922 George et al. Aug 2005 B2
7003061 Wiensky Feb 2006 B2
7015954 Foote et al. Mar 2006 B1
7025515 Woods Apr 2006 B2
7034866 Colmenarez et al. Apr 2006 B1
7079698 Kobayashi Jul 2006 B2
7102666 Kanade et al. Sep 2006 B2
7164807 Morton Jan 2007 B2
7206022 Miller et al. Apr 2007 B2
7239345 Rogina Jul 2007 B1
7286295 Sweatt et al. Oct 2007 B1
7304670 Hussey et al. Dec 2007 B1
7329856 Ma et al. Feb 2008 B2
7336430 George Feb 2008 B2
7417670 Linzer et al. Aug 2008 B1
7469381 Ording Dec 2008 B2
7477304 Hu Jan 2009 B2
7587109 Reininger Sep 2009 B1
7620309 Georgiev Nov 2009 B2
7623726 Georgiev Nov 2009 B1
7633513 Kondo et al. Dec 2009 B2
7683951 Aotsuka Mar 2010 B2
7687757 Tseng et al. Mar 2010 B1
7723662 Levoy et al. May 2010 B2
7724952 Shum et al. May 2010 B2
7748022 Frazier Jun 2010 B1
7847825 Aoki et al. Dec 2010 B2
7936377 Friedhoff et al. May 2011 B2
7936392 Ng et al. May 2011 B2
7941634 Georgi May 2011 B2
7945653 Zuckerberg et al. May 2011 B2
7949252 Georgiev May 2011 B1
7982776 Dunki-Jacobs et al. Jul 2011 B2
8013904 Tan et al. Sep 2011 B2
8085391 Machida et al. Dec 2011 B2
8106856 Matas et al. Jan 2012 B2
8115814 Iwase et al. Feb 2012 B2
8155456 Babacan Apr 2012 B2
8155478 Vitsnudel et al. Apr 2012 B2
8189089 Georgiev et al. May 2012 B1
8228417 Georgiev et al. Jul 2012 B1
8248515 Ng et al. Aug 2012 B2
8259198 Cote et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264546 Witt Sep 2012 B2
8279325 Pitts et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289440 Knight et al. Oct 2012 B2
8290358 Georgiev Oct 2012 B1
8310554 Aggarwal et al. Nov 2012 B2
8315476 Georgiev et al. Nov 2012 B1
8345144 Georgiev et al. Jan 2013 B1
8400533 Szedo Mar 2013 B1
8400555 Georgiev et al. Mar 2013 B1
8411948 Rother Apr 2013 B2
8427548 Lim Apr 2013 B2
8442397 Kang et al. May 2013 B2
8446516 Pitts et al. May 2013 B2
8494304 Venable et al. Jul 2013 B2
8531581 Shroff Sep 2013 B2
8542933 Venkataraman et al. Sep 2013 B2
8559705 Ng Oct 2013 B2
8570426 Pitts et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577216 Li et al. Nov 2013 B2
8581998 Ohno Nov 2013 B2
8589374 Chaudhri Nov 2013 B2
8593564 Border et al. Nov 2013 B2
8605199 Imai Dec 2013 B2
8614764 Pitts et al. Dec 2013 B2
8619082 Ciurea et al. Dec 2013 B1
8629930 Brueckner et al. Jan 2014 B2
8665440 Kompaniets et al. Mar 2014 B1
8675073 Aagaard et al. Mar 2014 B2
8724014 Ng et al. May 2014 B2
8736710 Spielberg May 2014 B2
8736751 Yun May 2014 B2
8749620 Pitts et al. Jun 2014 B1
8750509 Renkis Jun 2014 B2
8754829 Lapstun Jun 2014 B2
8760566 Pitts et al. Jun 2014 B2
8768102 Ng et al. Jul 2014 B1
8797321 Bertolami et al. Aug 2014 B1
8811769 Pitts et al. Aug 2014 B1
8831377 Pitts et al. Sep 2014 B2
8848970 Aller et al. Sep 2014 B2
8860856 Wetzstein et al. Oct 2014 B2
8879901 Caldwell et al. Nov 2014 B2
8903232 Caldwell Dec 2014 B1
8908058 Akeley et al. Dec 2014 B2
8948545 Akeley et al. Feb 2015 B2
8953882 Lim et al. Feb 2015 B2
8971625 Pitts et al. Mar 2015 B2
8976288 Ng et al. Mar 2015 B2
8988317 Liang et al. Mar 2015 B1
8995785 Knight et al. Mar 2015 B2
8997021 Liang et al. Mar 2015 B2
9001226 Ng et al. Apr 2015 B1
9013611 Szedo Apr 2015 B1
9106914 Doser Aug 2015 B2
9172853 Pitts et al. Oct 2015 B2
9184199 Pitts et al. Nov 2015 B2
9201193 Smith Dec 2015 B1
9210391 Mills Dec 2015 B1
9214013 Venkataraman et al. Dec 2015 B2
9294662 Vondran, Jr. et al. Mar 2016 B2
9300932 Knight et al. Mar 2016 B2
9305375 Akeley Apr 2016 B2
9305956 Pittes et al. Apr 2016 B2
9386288 Akeley et al. Jul 2016 B2
9392153 Myhre et al. Jul 2016 B2
9419049 Pitts et al. Aug 2016 B2
9467607 Ng et al. Oct 2016 B2
9497380 Jannard et al. Nov 2016 B1
9607424 Ng et al. Mar 2017 B2
9628684 Liang et al. Apr 2017 B2
9635332 Carroll et al. Apr 2017 B2
9639945 Oberheu et al. May 2017 B2
9647150 Blasco Claret May 2017 B2
9681069 El-Ghoroury et al. Jun 2017 B2
9774800 El-Ghoroury et al. Sep 2017 B2
9858649 Liang et al. Jan 2018 B2
9866810 Knight et al. Jan 2018 B2
9900510 Karafin et al. Feb 2018 B1
9979909 Kuang et al. May 2018 B2
20010048968 Cox et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010053202 Mazess et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020001395 Davis et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020015048 Nister Feb 2002 A1
20020061131 Sawhney May 2002 A1
20020109783 Hayashi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020159030 Frey et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020199106 Hayashi Dec 2002 A1
20030043270 Rafey Mar 2003 A1
20030081145 Seaman et al. May 2003 A1
20030103670 Schoelkopf et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030117511 Belz et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030123700 Wakao Jul 2003 A1
20030133018 Ziemkowski Jul 2003 A1
20030147252 Fioravanti Aug 2003 A1
20030156077 Balogh Aug 2003 A1
20040002179 Barton et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040012688 Tinnerinno et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040012689 Tinnerinno et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040101166 Williams et al. May 2004 A1
20040114176 Bodin et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040135780 Nims Jul 2004 A1
20040189686 Tanguay et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040257360 Sieckmann Dec 2004 A1
20050031203 Fukuda Feb 2005 A1
20050049500 Babu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050052543 Li et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050080602 Snyder et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050162540 Yata Jul 2005 A1
20050212918 Serra et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050276441 Debevec Dec 2005 A1
20060008265 Ito Jan 2006 A1
20060023066 Li et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060050170 Tanaka Mar 2006 A1
20060056040 Lan Mar 2006 A1
20060056604 Sylthe et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060072175 Oshino Apr 2006 A1
20060082879 Miyoshi et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060130017 Cohen et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060208259 Jeon Sep 2006 A1
20060248348 Wakao et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060250322 Hall et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060256226 Alon et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060274210 Kim Dec 2006 A1
20060285741 Subbarao Dec 2006 A1
20070008317 Lundstrom Jan 2007 A1
20070019883 Wong et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070030357 Levien et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070033588 Landsman Feb 2007 A1
20070052810 Monroe Mar 2007 A1
20070071316 Kubo Mar 2007 A1
20070081081 Cheng Apr 2007 A1
20070097206 Houvener May 2007 A1
20070103558 Cai et al. May 2007 A1
20070113198 Robertson et al. May 2007 A1
20070140676 Nakahara Jun 2007 A1
20070188613 Norbori et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201853 Petschnigg Aug 2007 A1
20070229653 Matusik et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070230944 Georgiev Oct 2007 A1
20070269108 Steinberg et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070273795 Jaynes Nov 2007 A1
20080007626 Wernersson Jan 2008 A1
20080012988 Baharav et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080018668 Yamauchi Jan 2008 A1
20080031537 Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049113 Hirai Feb 2008 A1
20080056569 Williams et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080122940 Mori May 2008 A1
20080129728 Satoshi Jun 2008 A1
20080144952 Chen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080152215 Horie et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080168404 Ording Jul 2008 A1
20080180792 Georgiev Jul 2008 A1
20080187305 Raskar et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080193026 Horie et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080205871 Utagawa Aug 2008 A1
20080226274 Spielberg Sep 2008 A1
20080232680 Berestov et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080253652 Gupta et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080260291 Alakarhu et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266688 Errando Smet et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080277566 Utagawa Nov 2008 A1
20080309813 Watanabe Dec 2008 A1
20080316301 Givon Dec 2008 A1
20090027542 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090041381 Georgiev et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090041448 Georgiev et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070710 Kagaya Mar 2009 A1
20090109280 Gotsman Apr 2009 A1
20090128658 Hayasaka et al. May 2009 A1
20090128669 Ng et al. May 2009 A1
20090135258 Nozaki May 2009 A1
20090140131 Utagawa Jun 2009 A1
20090102956 Georgiev Jul 2009 A1
20090185051 Sano Jul 2009 A1
20090185801 Georgiev et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090190022 Ichimura Jul 2009 A1
20090190024 Hayasaka et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090195689 Hwang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090202235 Li et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204813 Kwan Aug 2009 A1
20090207233 Mauchly et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090273843 Raskar et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090295829 Georgiev et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090309973 Kogane Dec 2009 A1
20090309975 Gordon Dec 2009 A1
20090310885 Tamaru Dec 2009 A1
20090321861 Oliver et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100003024 Agrawal et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100021001 Honsinger et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100026852 Ng et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100050120 Ohazama et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100060727 Steinberg et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100097444 Lablans Apr 2010 A1
20100103311 Makii Apr 2010 A1
20100107068 Butcher et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111489 Presler May 2010 A1
20100123784 Ding et al. May 2010 A1
20100141780 Tan et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100142839 Lakus-Becker Jun 2010 A1
20100201789 Yahagi Aug 2010 A1
20100253782 Elazary Oct 2010 A1
20100265385 Knight et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100277617 Hollinger Nov 2010 A1
20100277629 Tanaka Nov 2010 A1
20100303288 Malone Dec 2010 A1
20100328485 Imamura et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001858 Shintani Jan 2011 A1
20110018903 Lapstun et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110019056 Hirsch et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110025827 Shpunt et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032338 Raveendran et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110050864 Bond Mar 2011 A1
20110050909 Ellenby Mar 2011 A1
20110069175 Mistretta et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110075729 Dane et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110090255 Wilson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110091192 Iwane Apr 2011 A1
20110123183 Adelsberger et al. May 2011 A1
20110129120 Chan Jun 2011 A1
20110129165 Lim et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110148764 Gao Jun 2011 A1
20110149074 Lee et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110169994 DiFrancesco et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110205384 Zamowski et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110221947 Awazu Sep 2011 A1
20110242334 Wilburn et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110242352 Hikosaka Oct 2011 A1
20110249341 DiFrancesco et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110261164 Olesen et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110261205 Sun Oct 2011 A1
20110267263 Hinckley Nov 2011 A1
20110267348 Lin Nov 2011 A1
20110273466 Imai et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110279479 Rodriguez Nov 2011 A1
20110133649 Bales et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110292258 Adler Dec 2011 A1
20110293179 Dikmen Dec 2011 A1
20110298960 Tan et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110304745 Wang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311046 Oka Dec 2011 A1
20110316968 Taguchi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120014837 Fehr et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120050562 Perwass et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120056889 Carter et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120057040 Park et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120057806 Backlund et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120062755 Takahashi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120132803 Hirato et al. May 2012 A1
20120133746 Bigioi et al. May 2012 A1
20120147205 Lelescu et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120176481 Lukk et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120188344 Imai Jul 2012 A1
20120201475 Carmel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120206574 Shikata et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218463 Benezra et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120224787 Imai Sep 2012 A1
20120229691 Hiasa et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120249529 Matsumoto et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120249550 Akeley Oct 2012 A1
20120249819 Imai Oct 2012 A1
20120251131 Henderson et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120257065 Velarde et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120257795 Kim et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271115 Buerk Oct 2012 A1
20120272271 Nishizawa et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120287246 Katayama Nov 2012 A1
20120287296 Fukui Nov 2012 A1
20120287329 Yahata Nov 2012 A1
20120293075 Engelen et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300091 Shroff et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120237222 Ng et al. Dec 2012 A9
20130002902 Ito Jan 2013 A1
20130002936 Hirama et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130021486 Richardson Jan 2013 A1
20130038696 Ding et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130041215 McDowall Feb 2013 A1
20130044290 Kawamura Feb 2013 A1
20130050546 Kano Feb 2013 A1
20130064453 Nagasaka et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130064532 Caldwell et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130070059 Kushida Mar 2013 A1
20130070060 Chatterjee et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130077880 Venkataraman et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130082905 Ranieri et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130088616 Ingrassia, Jr. Apr 2013 A1
20130093844 Shuto Apr 2013 A1
20130093859 Nakamura Apr 2013 A1
20130094101 Oguchi Apr 2013 A1
20130107085 Ng et al. May 2013 A1
20130113981 Knight et al. May 2013 A1
20130120356 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130120605 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130120636 Baer May 2013 A1
20130121577 Wang May 2013 A1
20130127901 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130128052 Catrein et al. May 2013 A1
20130128081 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130128087 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130129213 Shectman May 2013 A1
20130135448 Nagumo et al. May 2013 A1
20130176481 Holmes et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130188068 Said Jul 2013 A1
20130215108 McMahon et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130215226 Chauvier et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130222656 Kaneko Aug 2013 A1
20130234935 Griffith Sep 2013 A1
20130242137 Kirkland Sep 2013 A1
20130243391 Park et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130258451 El-Ghoroury et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130262511 Kuffner et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130286236 Mankowski Oct 2013 A1
20130321574 Zhang et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130321581 El-Ghoroury Dec 2013 A1
20130321677 Cote et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130329107 Burley et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130329132 Tico et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130335596 Demandoix et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130342700 Kass Dec 2013 A1
20140002502 Han Jan 2014 A1
20140002699 Guan Jan 2014 A1
20140003719 Bai et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140013273 Ng Jan 2014 A1
20140035959 Lapstun Feb 2014 A1
20140037280 Shirakawa Feb 2014 A1
20140049663 Ng et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140059462 Wernersson Feb 2014 A1
20140085282 Luebke et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140092424 Grosz Apr 2014 A1
20140098191 Rime et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140132741 Aagaard et al. May 2014 A1
20140133749 Kuo et al. May 2014 A1
20140139538 Barber et al. May 2014 A1
20140167196 Heimgartner et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140168484 Suzuki Jun 2014 A1
20140176540 Tosic et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140176592 Wilburn et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140176710 Brady Jun 2014 A1
20140177905 Grefalda Jun 2014 A1
20140184885 Tanaka et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192208 Okincha Jul 2014 A1
20140193047 Grosz Jul 2014 A1
20140195921 Grosz Jul 2014 A1
20140204111 Vaidyanathan et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211077 Ng et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140218540 Geiss et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140226038 Kimura Aug 2014 A1
20140240463 Pitts et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140240578 Fishman et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140245367 Sasaki Aug 2014 A1
20140267243 Venkataraman et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267639 Tatsuta Sep 2014 A1
20140300646 Pitts Oct 2014 A1
20140300753 Yin Oct 2014 A1
20140313350 Keelan Oct 2014 A1
20140313375 Milnar Oct 2014 A1
20140333787 Venkataraman Nov 2014 A1
20140340390 Lanman et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140347540 Kang Nov 2014 A1
20140354863 Ahn et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140368494 Sakharnykh et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140368640 Strandemar et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150062178 Matas et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150062386 Sugawara Mar 2015 A1
20150092071 Meng et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150097985 Akeley Apr 2015 A1
20150130986 Ohnishi May 2015 A1
20150193937 Georgiev et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150206340 Munkberg et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150207990 Ford et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150237273 Sawadaishi Aug 2015 A1
20150104101 Bryant et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150288867 Kajimura Oct 2015 A1
20150304544 Eguchi Oct 2015 A1
20150310592 Kano Oct 2015 A1
20150312553 Ng et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150312593 Akeley et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150346832 Cole et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150370011 Ishihara Dec 2015 A1
20150370012 Ishihara Dec 2015 A1
20150373279 Osborne Dec 2015 A1
20160029017 Liang Jan 2016 A1
20160065931 Konieczny Mar 2016 A1
20160065947 Cole et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160142615 Liang May 2016 A1
20160155215 Suzuki Jun 2016 A1
20160165206 Huang et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160173844 Knight et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191823 El-Ghoroury Jun 2016 A1
20160253837 Zhu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160269620 Romanenko et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160307368 Akeley Oct 2016 A1
20160307372 Pitts et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160309065 Karafin et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160353006 Anderson Dec 2016 A1
20160353026 Blonde et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160381348 Hayasaka Dec 2016 A1
20170031146 Zheng Feb 2017 A1
20170059305 Nonn et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170067832 Ferrara, Jr. et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170078578 Sato Mar 2017 A1
20170094906 Liang et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170134639 Pitts et al. May 2017 A1
20170139131 Karafin et al. May 2017 A1
20170221226 Shen Aug 2017 A1
20170237971 Pitts et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170243373 Bevensee et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170244948 Pang et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170256036 Song et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170263012 Sabater et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170302903 Ng et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170358092 Bleibel et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170365068 Tan et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170374411 Lederer et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180007253 Abe Jan 2018 A1
20180012397 Carothers Jan 2018 A1
20180020204 Pang et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180024753 Gewickey et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180033209 Akeley et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180034134 Pang et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180070066 Knight et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180070067 Knight et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180082405 Liang Mar 2018 A1
20180089903 Pang et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180097867 Pang et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180158198 Karnad Jun 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
101226292 Jul 2008 CN
101309359 Nov 2008 CN
19624421 Jan 1997 DE
2010020100 Jan 2010 JP
2011135170 Jul 2011 JP
2003052465 Jun 2003 WO
2006039486 Apr 2006 WO
2007092545 Aug 2007 WO
2007092581 Aug 2007 WO
2011010234 Mar 2011 WO
2011029209 Mar 2011 WO
2011081187 Jul 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (171)
Entry
Georgiev, T., et al., “Suppersolution with Plenoptic 2.0 Cameras,” Optical Society of America 2009; pp. 1-3.
Georgiev, T., et al., “Unified Frequency Domain Analysis of Lightfield Cameras” (2008).
Georgiev, T., et al., Plenoptic Camera 2.0 (2008).
Girod, B., “Mobile Visual Search”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jul. 2011.
Gortler et al., “The lumigraph” SIGGRAPH 96, pp. 43-54.
Groen et al., “A Comparison of Different Focus Functions for Use in Autofocus Algorithms,” Cytometry 6:81-91, 1985.
Haeberli, Paul “A Multifocus Method for Controlling Depth of Field” GRAPHICA Obscura, 1994, pp. 1-3.
Heide, F. et al., “High-Quality Computational Imaging Through Simple Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, SIGGRAPH 2013; pp. 1-7.
Heidelberg Collaboratory for Image Processing, “Consistent Depth Estimation in a 4D Light Field,” May 2013.
Hirigoyen, F., et al., “1.1 um Backside Imager vs. Frontside Image: an optics-dedicated FDTD approach”, IEEE 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop.
Huang, Fu-Chung et al., “Eyeglasses-free Display: Towards Correcting Visual Aberrations with Computational Light Field Displays,” ACM Transaction on Graphics, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-12.
Isaksen, A., et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields,” SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306.
Ives H., “Optical properties of a Lippman lenticulated sheet,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 21, 171 (1931).
Ives, Fl “Parallax Panoramagrams Made with a Large Diameter Lens”, Journal of the Optical Society of America; 1930.
Jackson et al., “Selection of a Convolution Function for Fourier Inversion Using Gridding” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Sep. 1991, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 473-478.
Kautz, J., et al., “Fast arbitrary BRDF shading for low-frequency lighting using spherical harmonics”, in Eurographic Rendering Workshop 2002, 291-296.
Koltun, et al., “Virtual Occluders: An Efficient Interediate PVS Representation”, Rendering Techniques 2000: Proc. 11th Eurographics Workshop Rendering, pp. 59-70, Jun. 2000.
Kopf, J., et al., Deep Photo: Model-Based Photograph Enhancement and Viewing, SIGGRAPH Asia 2008.
Lehtinen, J., et al. “Matrix radiance transfer”, in Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 59-64, 2003.
Lesser, Michael, “Back-Side Illumination”, 2009.
Levin, A., et al., “Image and Depth from a Conventional Camera with a Coded Aperture”, SIGGRAPH 2007, pp. 1-9.
Levoy et al.,“Light Field Rendering” SIGGRAPH 96 Proceeding, 1996. pp. 31-42.
Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging” IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55.
Levoy, M. “Light Field Photography and Videography,” Oct. 18, 2005.
Levoy, M. “Stanford Light Field Microscope Project,” 2008; http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lfmicroscope/, 4 pages.
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Contrast Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010.
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Phase Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010.
Levoy, M., et al., “Light Field Microscopy,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 25, No. 3, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2006.
Liang, Chia-Kai, et al., “Programmable Aperture Photography: Multiplexed Light Field Acquisition”, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2008.
Lippmann, “Reversible Prints”, Communication at the French Society of Physics, Journal of Physics, 7 , 4, Mar. 1908, pp. 821-825.
Lumsdaine et al., “Full Resolution Lighffield Rendering” Adobe Technical Report Jan. 2008, pp. 1-12.
Maeda, Y. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with Pseudorandom Pixel Placement for Clear Imaging,” 2009 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Dec. 2009.
Magnor, M. et al., “Model-Aided Coding of Multi-Viewpoint Image Data,” Proceedings IEEE Conference on Image Processing, ICIP-2000, Vancouver, Canada, Sep. 2000. https://graphics.tu-bs.de/static/people/magnor/publications/icip00.pdf.
Mallat, Stephane, “A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing”, Academic Press 1998.
Malzbender, et al., “Polynomial Texture Maps”, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2001.
Marshall, Richard J. et al., “Improving Depth Estimation from a Plenoptic Camera by Patterned Illumination,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9528, 2015, pp. 1-6.
Masselus, Vincent, et al., “Relighting with 4D Incident Light Fields”, SIGGRAPH 2003.
Meynants, G., et al., “Pixel Binning in CMOS Image Sensors,” Frontiers in Electronic Imaging Conference, 2009.
Moreno-Noguer, F. et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Aug. 2007; pp. 1-9.
Munkberg, J. et al., “Layered Reconstruction for Defocus and Motion Blur” EGSR 2014, pp. 1-12.
Naemura et al., “3-D Computer Graphics based on Integral Photography” Optics Express, Feb. 12, 2001. vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 255-262.
Nakamura, J., “Image Sensors and Signal Processing for Digital Still Cameras” (Optical Science and Engineering), 2005.
National Instruments, “Anatomy of a Camera,” pp. 1-5, Sep. 6, 2006.
Nayar, Shree, et al., “Shape from Focus”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 824-831, Aug. 1994.
Ng, R., et al. “Light Field Photography with a Hand-held Plenoptic Camera,” Stanford Technical Report, CSTR 2005-2, 2005.
Ng, R., et al., “All-Frequency Shadows Using Non-linear Wavelet Lighting Approximation. ACM Transactions on Graphics,” ACM Transactions on Graphics; Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2003.
Ng, R., et al., “Triple Product Wavelet Integrals for All-Frequency Relighting”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004).
Ng, Yi-Ren, “Digital Light Field Photography,” Doctoral Thesis, Standford University, Jun. 2006; 203 pages.
Ng., R., “Fourier Slice Photography,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 735-744.
Nguyen, Hubert. “Practical Post-Process Depth of Field.” GPU Gems 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2008.
Nimeroff, J., et al., “Efficient rendering of naturally illuminatied environments” in Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 359-373, 1994.
Nokia, “City Lens”, May 2012.
Ogden, J., “Pyramid-Based Computer Graphics”, 1985.
Okano et al., “Three-dimensional video system based on integral photography” Optical Engineering, Jun. 1999. vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1072-1077.
Orzan, Alexandrina, et al., “Diffusion Curves: A Vector Representation for Smooth-Shaded Images,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008; vol. 27; 2008.
Pain, B., “Back-Side Illumination Technology for SOI-CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009.
Perez, Patrick et al., “Poisson Image Editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003; vol. 22, Issue 3; Jul. 2003; pp. 313-318.
Petschnigg, George, et al., “Digial Photography with Flash and No-Flash Image Pairs”, SIGGRAPH 2004.
Primesense, “The Primesense 3D Awareness Sensor”, 2007.
Ramamoorthi, R., et al, “Frequency space environment map rendering” ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2002 proceedings) 21, 3, 517-526.
Ramamoorthi, R., et al., “An efficient representation for irradiance environment maps”, in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 497-500.
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Glare Aware Photography: 4D Ray Sampling for Reducing Glare Effects of Camera Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, Aug. 2008; vol. 27, Issue 3; pp. 1-10.
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-Flash Imaging”, SIGGRAPH 2004.
Raytrix, “Raytrix Lightfield Camera,” Raytrix GmbH, Germany 2012, pp. 1-35.
Roper Scientific, Germany “Fiber Optics,” 2012.
Scharstein, Daniel, et al., “High-Accuracy Stereo Depth Maps Using Structured Light,” CVPR'03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society, pp. 195-202.
Schirmacher, H. et al., “High-Quality Interactive Lumigraph Rendering Through Warping,” May 2000, Graphics Interface 2000.
Shade, Jonathan, et al., “Layered Depth Images”, SIGGRAPH 98, pp. 1-2.
Shreiner, OpenGL Programming Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 8, 2010.
Simpleviewer, “Tiltview”, http://simpleviewer.net/tiltviewer. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Skodras, A, et al., “The JPEG 2000 Still Image Compression Standard,” Sep. 2001, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 36-58.
Sloan, P., et al., “Precomputed radiance transfer for real-time rendering in dynamic, low-frequency lighting environments”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 527-536, 2002.
Snavely, Noah, et al., “Photo-tourism: Exploring Photo collections in 3D”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings), 2006.
Sokolov, “Autostereoscopy and Integral Photography by Professor Lippmann's Method” , 1911, pp. 23-29.
Sony Corp, “Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera Handbook”, 2011.
Sony, Sony's First Curved Sensor Photo: http://www.engadget.com; Jul. 2014.
Stensvold, M., “Hybrid AF: A New Approach to Autofocus Is Emerging for both Still and Video”, Digital Photo Magazine, Nov. 13, 2012.
Story, D., “The Future of Photography”, Optics Electronics, Oct. 2008.
Sun, Jian, et al., “Stereo Matching Using Belief Propagation”, 2002.
Tagging photos on Flickr, Facebook and other online photo sharing sites (see, for example, http://support.gnip.com/customer/portal/articles/809309-flickr-geo-photos-tag-search). Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Takahashi, Keita, et al., “All in-focus View Synthesis from Under-Sampled Light Fields”, ICAT 2003, Tokyo, Japan.
Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification” Applied Optics 40, 11 (Apr. 10, 2001), pp. 1806-1813.
Tao, Michael, et al., “Depth from Combining Defocus and Correspondence Using Light-Field Cameras”, Dec. 2013.
Techcrunch, “Coolinis”, Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Teo, P., et al., “Efficient linear rendering for interactive light design”, Tech. Rep. STAN-CS-TN-97-60, 1998, Stanford University.
Teranishi, N. “Evolution of Optical Structure in Images Sensors,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2012 IEEE International; Dec. 10-13, 2012.
Vaish et al., “Using plane + parallax for calibrating dense camera arrays”, In Proceedings CVPR 2004, pp. 2-9.
Vaish, V., et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform,” Workshop on Advanced 3D Imaging for Safety and Security (in conjunction with CVPR 2005), 2005.
VR Playhouse, “The Surrogate,” http://www.vrplayhouse.com/the-surrogate.
Wanner, S. et al., “Globally Consistent Depth Labeling of 4D Light Fields,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012.
Wanner, S. et al., “Variational Light Field Analysis for Disparity Estimation and Super-Resolution,” IEEE Transacations on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellegence, 2013.
Wenger, et al, “Performance Relighting and Reflectance Transformation with Time-Multiplexed Illumination”, Institute for Creative Technologies, SIGGRAPH 2005.
Wetzstein, Gordon, et al., “Sensor Saturation in Fourier Multiplexed Imaging”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2010).
Wikipedia—Adaptive Optics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/adaptive_optics. Retrieved Feb. 2014.
Wikipedia—Autofocus systems and methods: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Bayer Filter: http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013.
Wikipedia—Color Image Pipeline: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/color_image_pipeline. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014.
Wikipedia—Compression standard JPEG XR: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—CYGM Filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYGM_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/967,076, filed Apr. 30, 2018 listing Jiantao Kuang et al. as inventors, entitled “Automatic Lens Flare Detection and Correction for Light-Field Images”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/666,298, filed Aug. 1, 2017 listing Yonggang Ha et al. as inventors, entitled “Focal Reducer With Controlled Optical Properties for Interchangeable Lens Light-Field Camera”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,808, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Adaptive Control for Immersive Experience Delivery”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/864,938, filed Jan. 8, 2018 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “Motion Blur for Light-Field Images”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,553, filed Sep. 13, 2017 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “4D Camera Tracking and Optical Stabilization”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,841, filed May 9, 2017 listing Kurt Akeley et al. as inventors, entitled “Vantage Generation and Interactive Playback”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,951, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Wedge-Based Light-Field Video Capture”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/874,723, filed Jan. 18, 2018 listing Mark Weir et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-Camera Navigation Interface”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,994, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Trevor Carothers et al. as inventors, entitled “Generation of Virtual Reality With 6 Degrees of Freesom From Limited Viewer Data”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/605,037, filed May 25, 2017 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Back-Projection to a Light-Field”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,836, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,942, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking With Grabcut”.
Adelsberger, R. et al., “Spatially Adaptive Photographic Flash,” ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report 612, 2008, pp. 1-12.
Adelson et al., “Single Lens Stereo with a Plenoptic Camera” IEEE Translation on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 1992. vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-106.
Adelson, E. H., and Bergen, J. R. 1991. The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, edited by Michael S. Landy and J. Anthony Movshon. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press.
Adobe Systems Inc, “XMP Specification”, Sep. 2005.
Adobe, “Photoshop CS6 / in depth: Digital Negative (DNG)”, http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2html. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Agarwala, A., et al., “Interactive Digital Photomontage,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004, vol. 32, No. 3, 2004.
Andreas Observatory, Spectrograph Manual: IV. Flat-Field Correction, Jul. 2006.
Apple, “Apple iPad: Photo Features on the iPad”, Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Bae, S., et al., “Defocus Magnification”, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 26, Issue 3 (Proc. of Eurographics 2007), pp. 1-9.
Belhumeur, Peter et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, pp. 1060-1066.
Belhumeur, Peter, et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1999, pp. 33-44, revised version.
Bhat, P. et al. “GradientShop: A Gradient-Domain Optimization Framework for Image and Video Filtering,” SIGGRAPH 2010; 14 pages.
Bolles, R., et al., “Epipolar-Plane Image Analysis: An Approach to Determining Structure from Motion”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 7-55 (1987).
Bourke, Paul, “Image filtering in the Frequency Domain,” pp. 1-9, Jun. 1998.
Canon, Canon Speedlite wireless flash system, User manual for Model 550EX, Sep. 1998.
Chai, Jin-Xang et al., “Plenoptic Sampling”, ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Annual Conference Series, 2000, pp. 307-318.
Chen, S. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with On-Chip Image Compression Based on Predictive Boundary Adaptation and Memoryless QTD Algorithm,” Very Large Scalee Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions, vol. 19, Issue 4; Apr. 2011.
Chen, W., et al., “Light Field mapping: Efficient representation and hardware rendering of surface light fields”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 447-456, 2002.
Cohen, Noy et al., “Enhancing the performance of the light field microscope using wavefront coding,” Optics Express, vol. 22, issue 20; 2014.
Daly, D., “Microlens Arrays” Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Debevec, et al, “A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compoisting” Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2002.
Debevec, P., et al., “Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face”, SIGGRAPH 2000.
Debevec, P., et al., “Recovering high dynamic radiance maps from photographs”, SIGGRAPH 1997, 369-378.
Design of the xBox menu. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Digital Photography Review, “Sony Announce new RGBE CCD,” Jul. 2003.
Dorsey, J., et al., “Design and simulation of opera light and projection effects”, in Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 91), vol. 25, 41-50.
Dorsey, J., et al., “Interactive design of complex time dependent lighting”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15, 2 (Mar. 1995), 26-36.
Dowski et al., “Wavefront coding: a modern method of achieving high performance and/or low cost imaging systems” SPIE Proceedings, vol. 3779, Jul. 1999, pp. 137-145.
Dowski, Jr. “Extended Depth of Field Through Wave-Front Coding,” Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 11, Apr. 10, 1995; pp. 1859-1866.
Duparre, J. et al., “Micro-Optical Artificial Compound Eyes,” Institute of Physics Publishing, Apr. 2006.
Eisemann, Elmar, et al., “Flash Photography Enhancement via Intrinsic Relighting”, SIGGRAPH 2004.
Fattal, Raanan, et al., “Multiscale Shape and Detail Enhancement from Multi-light Image Collections”, SIGGRAPH 2007.
Fernando, Randima, “Depth of Field—A Survey of Techniques,” GPU Gems. Boston, MA; Addison-Wesley, 2004.
Fitzpatrick, Brad, “Camlistore”, Feb. 1, 2011.
Fujifilm, Super CCD EXR Sensor by Fujifilm, brochure reference No. EB-807E, 2008.
Georgiev, T. et al., “Reducing Plenoptic Camera Artifacts,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1955-1968; 2010.
Georgiev, T., et al., “Spatio-Angular Resolution Tradeoff in Integral Photography,” Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2006.
Wikipedia—Data overlay techniques for real-time visual feed. For example, heads-up displays: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-up_display. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Exchangeable image file format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Expeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EXPEED. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014.
Wikipedia—Extensible Metadata Platform: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Platform. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Key framing for video animation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_frame. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Lazy loading of image data: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_loading. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Methods of Variable Bitrate Encoding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_bitrate#Methods_of VBR_encoding. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Portable Network Graphics format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Unsharp Mask Technique: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking. Retrieved May 3, 2016.
Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 24, Issue 3 (Jul. 2005), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 765-776.
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “High Speed Video Using a Dense Camera Array”, 2004.
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002.
Williams, L. “Pyramidal Parametrics,” Computer Graphic (1983).
Winnemoller, H., et al., “Light Waving: Estimating Light Positions From Photographs Alone”, Eurographics 2005.
Wippermann, F. “Chirped Refractive Microlens Array,” Dissertation 2007.
Wuu, S., et al., “A Manufacturable Back-Side Illumination Technology Using Bulk Si Substrate for Advanced CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway.
Wuu, S., et al., “BSI Technology with Bulk Si Wafer”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway.
Xiao, Z. et al., “Aliasing Detection and Reduction in Plenoptic Imaging,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2014.
Xu, Xin et al., “Robust Automatic Focus Algorithm for Low Contrast Images Using a New Contrast Measure,” Sensors 2011; 14 pages.
Zheng, C. et al., “Parallax Photography: Creating 3D Cinematic Effects from Stills”, Proceedings of Graphic Interface, 2009.
Zitnick, L. et al., “High-Quality Video View Interpolation Using a Layered Representation,” Aug. 2004; ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004; vol. 23, Issue 3; pp. 600-608.
Zoberbier, M., et al., “Wafer Cameras—Novel Fabrication and Packaging Technologies”, 2009 International Image Senor Workshop, Bergen, Norway, 5 pages.
Meng, J. et al., “An Approach on Hardware Design for Computational Photography Applications Based on Light Field Refocusing Algorithm,” Nov. 18, 2007, 12 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180288335 A1 Oct 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62481038 Apr 2017 US