Patent Grant
11653609
The present disclosure relates to compositions and methods useful in generating maize plants with enhanced resistance to northern leaf blight.
The official copy of the sequence listing is submitted electronically via EFS-Web as an ASCII formatted sequence listing with a file named 20160928_BB2396PCT_SequenceListing.txt created on Sep. 28, 2016 and having a size 65 kilobytes and is filed concurrently with the specification. The sequence listing contained in this ASCII formatted document is part of the specification and is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Northern leaf blight (NLB), induced by the fungal pathogen Exserohilum turcicum (previously called Helminthosporium turcicum), is a serious foliar wilt disease of maize in many tropical and temperate environments. Symptoms can range from cigar-shaped lesions on the lower leaves to complete destruction of the foliage, thereby reducing the amount of leaf surface area available for photosynthesis. A reduction in photosynthetic capability leads to a lack of carbohydrates needed for grain fill, which impacts grain yield. Mid-altitude regions of the tropics, about 900-1600 m above sea level, have a particularly favorable climate for northern leaf blight, as dew periods are long and temperatures moderate. However, northern leaf blight can also yield losses of 30-50% in temperate environments, such as in the United States, during wet seasons, particularly if the infection is established on the upper leaves of the plant by the silking stage.
The most effective and most preferred method of control for northern leaf blight is the planting of resistant hybrids. Several varieties or races of Exserohilum turcicum are present in nature, leaving growers with two hybrid options: partial resistant hybrids, which offer low-level, broad spectrum protection against multiple races, and race-specific resistant hybrids, which protect against a specific race. Genetic sources of resistance to Exserohilum turcicum have been described, and four Exserohilum turcicum resistance loci have been identified: Ht1, Ht2, Ht3, and Htn1. Gene Ht1 maps to the long arm of chromosome 2 where it is closely linked to umc36 (Coe, E. H. et al. (1988), Corn and Corn Improvement, 3rd edn., pp. 81-258), sgcr506 (Gupta, M. et al. (1989) Maize Genet. Coop. Newsl. 63, 112), umc150B (Bentolila, S. et al. (1991) Theor. Appl. Genet., 82:393-398), and pic18a (Collins et al. (1998) Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 11:968-978), and it is closely flanked by umc22 and umc122 (Li et al. (1998) Hereditas, 129:101-106). Gene Ht2 maps to the long arm of chromosome 8 in the umc48-umc89 interval (Zaitlin et al. (1992) Maize Genet. Coop. Newsl., 66, 69-70), and gene Ht3 maps to chromosome 7 near bnIg1666 (Van Staden, D et al. (2001) Maize Genetics Conference Abstracts 43:P134). The Htn1 gene maps to chromosome 8, approximately 10 cM distal to Ht2 and 0.8 cM distal to the RFLP marker umc117 (Simcox and Bennetzen (1993) Maize Genet. Coop. Newl. 67, 118-119; Simcox and Bennetzen (1993) Phytopathology, 83:1326-1330).
The methods of controlling northern leaf blight by reducing fungal inoculum require additional time and resources on the part of the farmer, and in addition, can have detrimental effects on the environment. This makes the planting of resistant hybrids even more attractive to farmers and the general public. Thus, it is desirable to provide compositions and methods for generating maize plants with enhanced resistance to northern leaf blight.
Presented herein are compositions and methods for generating maize plants exhibiting resistance to northern leaf blight, whether that resistance is newly conferred or enhanced.
Isolated polynucleotides are presented herein that can be used to generate maize plants that exhibit resistance to northern leaf blight. An isolated polynucleotide may be selected from the group consisting of: (a) the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 (PH4GP c-DNA), SEQ ID NO:3 (PH1W2 cDNA), or SEQ ID NO:9 (PH4GP Genomic sequence); (b) a nucleotide sequence encoding a CC-NB-LRR polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 90% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:4, based on the CLUSTAL W method of alignment with default parameters; (c) a nucleotide sequence encoding a CC-NB-LRR polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 90% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:4, based on the CLUSTAL W method of alignment with default parameters, wherein said polypeptide comprises the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:10; and (d) a nucleotide sequence encoding a CC-NB-LRR polypeptide having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:4.
Polynucleotide constructs comprising the isolated polynucleotides are also provided, wherein an isolated polynucleotide is operably linked to a promoter. A polynucleotide construct may further comprise one or more heterologous nucleic acid sequences that encode a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of: a polypeptide conferring disease resistance, a polypeptide conferring herbicide resistance, a polypeptide conferring insect resistance, a polypeptide involved in carbohydrate metabolism, a polypeptide involved in fatty acid metabolism, a polypeptide involved in amino acid metabolism, a polypeptide involved in plant development, a polypeptide involved in plant growth regulation, a polypeptide involved in yield improvement, a polypeptide involved in drought resistance, a polypeptide involved in cold resistance, a polypeptide involved in heat resistance, and/or a polypeptide involved in salt resistance, wherein the one or more heterologous nucleic acid sequences are operably linked to a promoter. For example, a polypeptide conferring disease resistance may be a polypeptide that confers resistance to northern leaf blight (NLB), which may further have an amino acid sequence of at least 90% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO:11 or 12, based on the CLUSTAL W method of alignment with default parameters.
Maize plant cells comprising the polynucleotide constructs and maize plants comprising the maize plant cells are also provided.
Methods for generating maize plants that exhibit resistance to northern leaf blight are provided herein, in which a polynucleotide construct comprising an isolated polynucleotide provided herein, wherein said isolated polynucleotide is operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, is expressed in a regenerable maize plant cell, and a maize plant that exhibits resistance to northern leaf blight is generated from the maize plant cell. The maize plant generated by the method comprises in its genome the polynucleotide construct. The regulatory sequence may be a promoter and/or a terminator and may be native to maize. In some aspects, the regulatory sequence is native to the Ht1 gene. In still other aspects, the polynucleotide construct comprises one or more additional heterologous nucleic acid sequences that encode a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of: a polypeptide conferring disease resistance, a polypeptide conferring herbicide resistance, a polypeptide conferring insect resistance, a polypeptide involved in carbohydrate metabolism, a polypeptide involved in fatty acid metabolism, a polypeptide involved in amino acid metabolism, a polypeptide involved in plant development, a polypeptide involved in plant growth regulation, a polypeptide involved in yield improvement, a polypeptide involved in drought resistance, a polypeptide involved in cold resistance, a polypeptide involved in heat resistance, and/or a polypeptide involved in salt resistance, wherein each heterologous nucleic acid sequence is operably linked to a promoter. The polypeptide may be one that confers resistance to northern leaf blight (NLB), such as for example, a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 90% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO:11 or 12, based on the CLUSTAL W method of alignment with default parameters. A progeny plant comprising the polynucleotide construct may also be generated by crossing the maize plant generated by the method to a second maize plant that does not comprise in its genome the polynucleotide construct.
The invention can be more fully understood from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings and Sequence Listing which form a part of this application. The Sequence Listing contains the one letter code for nucleotide sequence characters and the three letter codes for amino acids as defined in conformity with the IUPAC-IUBMB standards described in Nucleic Acids Research 13:3021-3030 (1985) and in the Biochemical Journal 219 (No. 2): 345-373 (1984), which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. The symbols and format used for nucleotide and amino acid sequence data comply with the rules set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.822.
SEQ ID NO:1 is the nucleotide sequence of the Ht1 cDNA found in inbred line PH4GP.
SEQ ID NO:2 is the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide encoded by SEQ ID NO:1.
SEQ ID NO:3 is the nucleotide sequence of the Ht1 cDNA found in inbred line PH1W2.
SEQ ID NO:4 is the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide encoded by SEQ ID NO:3.
SEQ ID NO:5 is the nucleotide sequence of the Ht1 cDNA found in inbred line B73 and herein referred to as the “B73-high allele”.
SEQ ID NO:6 is the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide encoded by SEQ ID NO:5.
SEQ ID NO:7 is the nucleotide sequence of the Ht1 cDNA found in inbred line B73 and herein referred to as the “B73-low allele”.
SEQ ID NO:8 is the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide encoded by SEQ ID NO:7.
SEQ ID NO:9 is the nucleotide sequence of the Ht1 genomic DNA found in inbred line PH4GP.
SEQ ID NO:10 is the amino acid sequence of a region found in the Ht1 polypeptides of resistant alleles.
SEQ ID NO:11 is the amino acid sequence of NLB18 from line PH99N in patent application WO2011163590.
SEQ ID NO:12 is the amino acid sequence of NLB18 from line PH26N in patent application WO2011163590.
Before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular embodiments, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification and the appended claims, terms in the singular and the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the”, for example, include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “plant”, “the plant” or “a plant” also includes a plurality of plants; also, depending on the context, use of the term “plant” can also include genetically similar or identical progeny of that plant; use of the term “a nucleic acid” optionally includes, as a practical matter, many copies of that nucleic acid molecule; similarly, the term “probe” optionally (and typically) encompasses many similar or identical probe molecules.
Unless otherwise indicated, nucleic acids are written left to right in 5′ to 3′ orientation. Numeric ranges recited within the specification are inclusive of the numbers defining the range and include each integer or any non-integer fraction within the defined range. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice for testing of the present invention, the preferred materials and methods are described herein. In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below.
I. Compositions
A. Ht1 Polynucleotides and Polypeptides
Mapping of a QTL associated with northern leaf blight resistance on chromosome 2, using a population derived from a cross between northern leaf blight resistant line PH4GP and northern leaf blight susceptible line PH5W4, was described in US2010095395. Presented herein is the cloning of the Ht1 gene in maize and identification of a putative CC-NB-LRR (coiled-coil, nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat) gene as the causal gene. Ht1 cDNA sequences from PH4GP and PH1W2, the two resistant sources described in US2010095395, are represented by SEQ ID NOs:1 and 3, respectively, while the amino acid sequences of the encoded polypeptides are represented by SEQ ID NO:2 and 4. Moreover, a construct containing the genomic sequence of the PH4GP (resistant) allele (SEQ ID NO:9) was generated and transformed into a susceptible transformation line using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, resulting in maize plants with resistance to northern leaf blight.
The Zea mays CC-NB-LRR (coiled-coil, nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat; also referred to as Ht1) gene is a member of a large and complex family of disease resistance genes. The mechanism of NB-LRR protein activation and subsequent signaling in effector triggered immunity is not well understood (Eitas and Dangl. 2010. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13(4):472-477).
Thus, presented herein are polynucleotides that can be used to generate maize plants with resistance to northern leaf blight. The polynucleotide may be (a) the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 (PH4GP c-DNA), SEQ ID NO:3 (PH1W2 cDNA), or SEQ ID NO:9 (PH4GP Genomic sequence); (b) a nucleotide sequence encoding a CC-NB-LRR polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:4, based on the CLUSTAL W method of alignment with default parameters; (c) a nucleotide sequence encoding a CC-NB-LRR polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:4, based on the CLUSTAL W method of alignment with default parameters, wherein said polypeptide comprises the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:10, which is the sequence of the deleted region of Ht1 in B73; and (d) a nucleotide sequence encoding a CC-NB-LRR polypeptide having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:4.
The use of the term “polynucleotide” is not intended to limit a polynucleotide of the disclosure to a polynucleotide comprising DNA. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that polynucleotides can comprise ribonucleotides and combinations of ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotides. Such deoxyribonucleotides and ribonucleotides include both naturally occurring molecules and synthetic analogues. The polynucleotides of the disclosure also encompass all forms of sequences including, but not limited to, single-stranded forms, double-stranded forms, hairpins, stem-and-loop structures, and the like.
As used herein, an “isolated” or “purified” polynucleotide or polypeptide, or biologically active portion thereof, is substantially or essentially free from components that normally accompany or interact with the polynucleotide or polypeptide as found in its naturally occurring environment. Thus, an isolated or purified polynucleotide or polypeptide is substantially free of other cellular material or culture medium when produced by recombinant techniques, or substantially free of chemical precursors or other chemicals when chemically synthesized. Optimally, an “isolated” polynucleotide is free of sequences (optimally protein encoding sequences) that naturally flank the polynucleotide (i.e., sequences located at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the polynucleotide) in the genomic DNA of the organism from which the polynucleotide is derived. For purposes of this disclosure, “isolated” or “recombinant” when used to refer to nucleic acid molecules excludes isolated unmodified chromosomes. For example, in various embodiments, the isolated polynucleotide can contain less than about 5 kb, 4 kb, 3 kb, 2 kb, 1 kb, 0.5 kb, or 0.1 kb of nucleotide sequence that naturally flank the polynucleotide in genomic DNA of the cell from which the polynucleotide is derived. A polypeptide that is substantially free of cellular material includes preparations of polypeptides having less than about 30%, 20%, 10%, 5%, or 1% (by dry weight) of contaminating protein. When the polypeptide of the disclosure or a biologically active portion thereof is recombinantly produced, optimally culture medium represents less than about 30%, 20%, 10%, 5%, or 1% (by dry weight) of chemical precursors or non-protein-of-interest chemicals.
As used herein, a “recombinant” polynucleotide comprises a combination of two or more chemically linked nucleic acid segments which are not found directly joined in nature. By “directly joined” is intended the two nucleic acid segments are immediately adjacent and joined to one another by a chemical linkage. In specific embodiments, the recombinant polynucleotide comprises a polynucleotide of interest such that an additional chemically linked nucleic acid segment is located either 5′, 3′ or internal to the polynucleotide of interest. Alternatively, the chemically-linked nucleic acid segment of the recombinant polynucleotide can be formed by the deletion of a sequence. The additional chemically linked nucleic acid segment or the sequence deleted to join the linked nucleic acid segments can be of any length, including for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20 or greater nucleotides. Various methods for making such recombinant polynucleotides are disclosed herein, including, for example, by chemical synthesis or by the manipulation of isolated segments of polynucleotides by genetic engineering techniques. In specific embodiments, the recombinant polynucleotide can comprise a recombinant DNA sequence or a recombinant RNA sequence.
A “recombinant polypeptide” comprises a combination of two or more chemically linked amino acid segments which are not found directly joined in nature. In specific embodiments, the recombinant polypeptide comprises an additional chemically linked amino acid segment that is located either at the N-terminal, C-terminal or internal to the recombinant polypeptide. Alternatively, the chemically-linked amino acid segment of the recombinant polypeptide can be formed by deletion of at least one amino acid. The additional chemically linked amino acid segment or the deleted chemically linked amino acid segment can be of any length, including for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20 or amino acids.
Sequence alignments and percent identity calculations may be determined using a variety of comparison methods designed to detect homologous sequences including, but not limited to, the MEGALIGN® program of the LASERGENE® bioinformatics computing suite (DNASTAR® Inc., Madison, Wis.). Unless stated otherwise, multiple alignment of the sequences provided herein were performed using the CLUSTAL V method of alignment (Higgins and Sharp, CABIOS. 5:151 153 (1989)) with the default parameters (GAP PENALTY=10, GAP LENGTH PENALTY=10). Default parameters for pairwise alignments and calculation of percent identity of protein sequences using the CLUSTAL V method are KTUPLE=1, GAP PENALTY=3, WINDOW=5 and DIAGONALS SAVED=5. For nucleic acids these parameters are KTUPLE=2, GAP PENALTY=5, WINDOW=4 and DIAGONALS SAVED=4. After alignment of the sequences, using the CLUSTAL V program, it is possible to obtain “percent identity” and “divergence” values by viewing the “sequence distances” table on the same program; unless stated otherwise, percent identities and divergences provided and claimed herein were calculated in this manner.
Alternatively, the Clustal W method of alignment may be used. The Clustal W method of alignment (described by Higgins and Sharp, CABIOS. 5:151-153 (1989); Higgins, D. G. et al., Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:189-191 (1992)) can be found in the MegAlign™ v6.1 program of the LASERGENE® bioinformatics computing suite (DNASTAR® Inc., Madison, Wis.). Default parameters for multiple alignment correspond to GAP PENALTY=10, GAP LENGTH PENALTY=0.2, Delay Divergent Sequences=30%, DNA Transition Weight=0.5, Protein Weight Matrix=Gonnet Series, DNA Weight Matrix=IUB. For pairwise alignments the default parameters are Alignment=Slow-Accurate, Gap Penalty=10.0, Gap Length=0.10, Protein Weight Matrix=Gonnet 250 and DNA Weight Matrix=IUB. After alignment of the sequences using the Clustal W program, it is possible to obtain “percent identity” and “divergence” values by viewing the “sequence distances” table in the same program.
B. Polynucleotide Constructs
The Ht1 polynucleotides disclosed herein can be provided in expression cassettes (such as, for example, in the form of polynucleotide constructs) for expression in the plant of interest or any organism of interest. The cassette can include 5′ and 3′ regulatory sequences operably linked to an Ht1 polynucleotide. “Operably linked” is intended to mean a functional linkage between two or more elements. For example, an operable linkage between a polynucleotide of interest and a regulatory sequence (i.e., a promoter) is a functional link that allows for expression of the polynucleotide of interest. Operably linked elements may be contiguous or non-contiguous. When used to refer to the joining of two protein coding regions, by operably linked is intended that the coding regions are in the same reading frame. The cassette may additionally contain at least one additional gene to be cotransformed into the organism. Alternatively, the additional gene(s) can be provided on multiple expression cassettes. Such an expression cassette is provided with a plurality of restriction sites and/or recombination sites for insertion of the Ht1 polynucleotide to be under the transcriptional regulation of the regulatory regions. The expression cassette may additionally contain selectable marker genes.
The expression cassette can include in the 5′-3′ direction of transcription, a transcriptional and translational initiation region (i.e., a promoter), an Ht1 polynucleotide, and a transcriptional and translational termination region (i.e., termination region) functional in plants. The regulatory regions (i.e., promoters, transcriptional regulatory regions, and translational termination regions) and/or the Ht1 polynucleotide may be native/analogous to the maize plant cell or to each other. Alternatively, the regulatory regions and/or the Ht1 polynucleotide may be heterologous to the maize plant cell or to each other.
As used herein, “heterologous” in reference to a sequence is a sequence that originates from a foreign species, or, if from the same species, is substantially modified from its native form in composition and/or genomic locus by deliberate human intervention. For example, a promoter operably linked to a heterologous polynucleotide is from a species different from the species from which the polynucleotide was derived, or, if from the same/analogous species, one or both are substantially modified from their original form and/or genomic locus, or the promoter is not the native promoter for the operably linked polynucleotide.
The termination region may be native with the transcriptional initiation region, may be native with a maize plant, or may be derived from another source (i.e., foreign or heterologous) with respect to the promoter, the Ht1 polynucleotide, the maize plant, or any combination thereof.
The expression cassettes may additionally contain 5′ leader sequences. Such leader sequences can act to enhance translation. Translation leaders are known in the art and include viral translational leader sequences.
In preparing the expression cassette, the various DNA fragments may be manipulated, so as to provide for the DNA sequences in the proper orientation and, as appropriate, in the proper reading frame. Toward this end, adapters or linkers may be employed to join the DNA fragments or other manipulations may be involved to provide for convenient restriction sites, removal of superfluous DNA, removal of restriction sites, or the like. For this purpose, in vitro mutagenesis, primer repair, restriction, annealing, resubstitutions, e.g., transitions and transversions, may be involved.
A number of promoters can be used to express the various Ht1 sequences disclosed herein, including the native promoter of the polynucleotide sequence of interest (such as, for example, the native promoter of the Ht1 gene). The promoters can be selected based on the desired outcome. Such promoters include, for example, constitutive, inducible, tissue-preferred, or other promoters for expression in plants or in any organism of interest. Synthetic promoters can also be used to express Ht1 sequences. Synthetic promoters include for example a combination of one or more heterologous regulatory elements.
A polynucleotide construct may be a recombinant DNA construct. A “recombinant DNA construct” comprises two or more operably linked DNA segments which are not found operably linked in nature. Non-limiting examples of recombinant DNA constructs include a polynucleotide of interest operably linked to heterologous sequences which aid in the expression, autologous replication, and/or genomic insertion of the sequence of interest. Such heterologous and operably linked sequences include, for example, promoters, termination sequences, enhancers, etc, or any component of an expression cassette; a plasmid, cosmid, virus, autonomously replicating sequence, phage, or linear or circular single-stranded or double-stranded DNA or RNA nucleotide sequence; and/or sequences that encode heterologous polypeptides.
C. Maize Plant Cells and Maize Plants
“Maize” refers to a plant of the Zea mays L. ssp. mays and is also known as “corn”.
Maize plants, maize plant cells, maize plant parts and seeds, and maize grain having the Ht1 sequences disclosed herein are also provided. In specific embodiments, the plants and/or plant parts have stably incorporated at least one heterologous Ht1 polypeptide disclosed herein. In addition, the plants or organism of interest can comprise multiple Ht1 polynucleotides (i.e., at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or more).
As used herein, the term maize plant includes maize plant cells, maize plant protoplasts, maize plant cell tissue cultures from which maize plants can be regenerated, maize plant calli, maize plant clumps, and maize plant cells that are intact in maize plants or parts of maize plants such as embryos, pollen, ovules, seeds, leaves, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, stalks, roots, root tips, anthers, and the like. Grain is intended to mean the mature seed produced by commercial growers for purposes other than growing or reproducing the species.
D. Other Traits of Interest
In some embodiments, the Ht1 polynucleotides disclosed herein may be engineered into a molecular stack. Thus, the various maize plants, maize plant cells and maize seeds disclosed herein can further comprise one or more traits of interest, and in more specific embodiments, the maize plant, maize plant part or maize plant cell is stacked with any combination of polynucleotide sequences of interest in order to create plants with a desired combination of traits.
As used herein, the term “stacked” includes having the multiple traits present in the same plant or organism of interest. In one non-limiting example, “stacked traits” comprise a molecular stack where the sequences are physically adjacent to each other. A trait, as used herein, refers to the phenotype derived from a particular sequence or groups of sequences.
A polynucleotide DNA construct described herein may also comprise one or more heterologous nucleic acid sequences that encode a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of: a polypeptide conferring disease resistance, a polypeptide conferring herbicide resistance, a polypeptide conferring insect resistance, a polypeptide involved in carbohydrate metabolism, a polypeptide involved in fatty acid metabolism, a polypeptide involved in amino acid metabolism, a polypeptide involved in plant development, a polypeptide involved in plant growth regulation, a polypeptide involved in yield improvement, a polypeptide involved in drought resistance, a polypeptide involved in cold resistance, a polypeptide involved in heat resistance, and/or a polypeptide involved in salt resistance, wherein each heterologous nucleic acid sequence is operably linked to a promoter.
A polypeptide conferring disease resistance may be another polypeptide that confers resistance to northern leaf blight (NLB). For example, a polynucleotide DNA construct may comprise a resistant allele of Ht1 and a resistant allele of NLB18 (in WO2011163590). The amino acid sequence of the NLB18 polypeptide from line PH99N is presented herein as SEQ ID NO:11; the amino acid sequence of the NLB18 polypeptide from line PH26N is presented herein as SEQ ID NO:12. Both PH99N and PH26N are maize lines showing resistance to northern leaf blight that reflect different sources of resistance with respect to the chromosome 8 QTL, as described in application WO2011163590. A resistant allele of NLB18 may encode a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO:11 or 12, based on the CLUSTAL W method of alignment with default parameters.
II. Methods of Generating Maize Plants with Northern Leaf Blight Resistance
“Exserohilum turcicum”, previously referred to as Helminthosporium turcicum, is the fungal pathogen that induces northern leaf blight infection. The fungal pathogen is also referred to herein as Exserohilum or Et.
“Disease resistance” (such as, for example, northern leaf blight resistance) is a characteristic of a plant, wherein the plant avoids the disease symptoms that are the outcome of plant-pathogen interactions, such as maize-Exserohilum turcicum interactions. That is, pathogens are prevented from causing plant diseases and the associated disease symptoms, or alternatively, the disease symptoms caused by the pathogen are minimized or lessened. One of skill in the art will appreciate that the compositions and methods disclosed herein can be used with other compositions and methods available in the art for protecting plants from pathogen attack.
“Resistance” is a relative term, indicating that the infected plant produces better yield of maize than another, similarly treated, more susceptible plant. That is, the conditions cause a reduced decrease in maize survival and/or yield in a tolerant maize plant, as compared to a susceptible maize plant. One of skill will appreciate that maize plant resistance to northern leaf blight, or the pathogen causing such, can represent a spectrum of more resistant or less resistant phenotypes, and can vary depending on the severity of the infection. However, by simple observation, one of skill can determine the relative resistance or susceptibility of different plants, plant lines or plant families to northern leaf blight, and furthermore, will also recognize the phenotypic gradations of “resistant”. For example, a 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the level of resistance to northern leaf blight can be used. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data should be collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment measured. The terms “tolerance” and “resistance” are used interchangeably herein.
The resistance may be “newly conferred” or “enhanced”. “Newly conferred” or “enhanced” resistance refers to an increased level of resistance against a particular pathogen, a wide spectrum of pathogens, or an infection caused by the pathogen(s). An increased level of resistance against a particular fungal pathogen, such as Et, for example, constitutes “enhanced” or improved fungal resistance. The embodiments of the invention will enhance or improve fungal plant pathogen resistance, such that the resistance of the plant to a fungal pathogen or pathogens will increase, which in turn, will increase resistance to the disease caused by the fungal pathogen. The term “enhance” refers to improve, increase, amplify, multiply, elevate, raise, and the like.
The maize plants generated by the methods described herein may provide durable and broad spectrum resistance to the maize plant and may assist in breeding of northern leaf blight resistant maize plants. For instance, if multiple northern leaf blight resistance genes are stacked into one unit, this reduces the number of specific loci that require trait introgression through backcrossing and minimizes linkage drag from non-elite resistant donors.
Various methods can be used to introduce a sequence of interest into a maize plant cell, maize plant or maize plant part. “Introducing” is intended to mean presenting to the maize plant cell, maize plant, or maize plant part the polynucleotide in such a manner that the sequence gains access to the interior of a cell of the maize plant. The methods of the disclosure do not depend on a particular method for introducing a sequence into an organism or a maize plant or maize plant part, only that the polynucleotide gains access to the interior of at least one cell of the maize plant. Methods for introducing polynucleotides into various organisms, including maize plants, are known in the art, including, but not limited to, stable transformation methods, transient transformation methods, and virus-mediated methods.
“Stable transformation” is intended to mean that the polynucleotide construct introduced into a maize plant integrates into the genome of the maize plant and is capable of being inherited by the progeny thereof. “Transient transformation” is intended to mean that a polynucleotide is introduced into the maize plant and does not integrate into the genome of the maize plant.
Transformation protocols as well as protocols for introducing polynucleotide sequences into plants such as maize may vary. Suitable methods of introducing polynucleotides into maize plant cells include microinjection (Crossway et al. (1986) Biotechniques 4:320 334), electroporation (Riggs et al. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:5602 5606, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,563,055 and 5,981,840), direct gene transfer (Paszkowski et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3:2717 2722), and ballistic particle acceleration (see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,945,050; 5,879,918; 5,886,244; and, 5,932,782; Tomes et al. (1995) in Plant Cell, Tissue, and Organ Culture: Fundamental Methods, ed. Gamborg and Phillips (Springer-Verlag, Berlin); McCabe et al. (1988) Biotechnology 6:923 926); and Lec1 transformation (WO 00/28058). Also see Klein et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:4305 4309 (maize); Klein et al. (1988) Biotechnology 6:559 563 (maize); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,240,855; 5,322,783; and, 5,324,646; Klein et al. (1988) Plant Physiol. 91:440 444 (maize); Fromm et al. (1990) Biotechnology 8:833 839 (maize); Hooykaas-Van Slogteren et al. (1984) Nature (London) 311:763-764; U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,369 (cereals); De Wet et al. (1985) in The Experimental Manipulation of Ovule Tissues, ed. Chapman et al. (Longman, New York), pp. 197-209 (pollen); D'Halluin et al. (1992) Plant Cell 4:1495-1505 (electroporation); and Osjoda et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnology 14:745-750 (maize via Agrobacterium tumefaciens); all of which are herein incorporated by reference.
In other embodiments, the Ht1 polynucleotide disclosed herein thereof may be introduced into plants by contacting plants with a virus or viral nucleic acids. Generally, such methods involve incorporating a polynucleotide construct of the disclosure within a DNA or RNA molecule. It is recognized that the Ht1 sequence may be initially synthesized as part of a viral polyprotein, which later may be processed by proteolysis in vivo or in vitro to produce the desired recombinant protein. Further, it is recognized that promoters disclosed herein also encompass promoters utilized for transcription by viral RNA polymerases. Methods for introducing polynucleotides into plants and expressing a protein encoded therein, involving viral DNA or RNA molecules, are known in the art. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,889,191, 5,889,190, 5,866,785, 5,589,367, 5,316,931, and Porta et al. (1996) Molecular Biotechnology 5:209-221; herein incorporated by reference.
Methods are known in the art for the targeted insertion of a polynucleotide at a specific location in the plant genome. In one embodiment, the insertion of the polynucleotide at a desired genomic location is achieved using a site-specific recombination system. See, for example, WO99/25821, WO99/25854, WO99/25840, WO99/25855, and WO99/25853, all of which are herein incorporated by reference. Briefly, the polynucleotide disclosed herein can be contained in transfer cassette flanked by two non-recombinogenic recombination sites. The transfer cassette is introduced into a plant having stably incorporated into its genome a target site which is flanked by two non-recombinogenic recombination sites that correspond to the sites of the transfer cassette. An appropriate recombinase is provided and the transfer cassette is integrated at the target site. The polynucleotide of interest is thereby integrated at a specific chromosomal position in the plant genome. Other methods to target polynucleotides are set forth in WO 2009/114321 (herein incorporated by reference), which describes “custom” meganucleases produced to modify plant genomes, in particular the genome of maize. See, also, Gao et al. (2010) Plant Journal 1:176-187.
The cells that have been transformed may be grown into plants in accordance with conventional ways. See, for example, McCormick et al. (1986) Plant Cell Reports 5:81-84. These plants may then be grown, and either pollinated with the same transformed strain or different strains, and the resulting progeny having constitutive expression of the desired phenotypic characteristic identified. Two or more generations may be grown to ensure that expression of the desired phenotypic characteristic is stably maintained and inherited and then seeds harvested to ensure expression of the desired phenotypic characteristic has been achieved. In this manner, the present disclosure provides transformed seed (also referred to as “transgenic seed”) having a polynucleotide disclosed herein, for example, as part of an expression cassette, stably incorporated into their genome.
Transformed maize plant cells which are derived by plant transformation techniques, including those discussed above, can be cultured to regenerate a whole plant which possesses the transformed genotype (i.e., an Ht1 polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide that confers resistance to northern leaf blight), and thus the desired phenotype, such as resistance to northern leaf blight, whether that resistance is newly conferred or enhanced. For transformation and regeneration of maize see, Gordon-Kamm et al., The Plant Cell, 2:603-618 (1990). Plant regeneration from cultured protoplasts is described in Evans et al. (1983) Protoplasts Isolation and Culture, Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, pp 124-176, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York; and Binding (1985) Regeneration of Plants, Plant Protoplasts pp 21-73, CRC Press, Boca Raton. Regeneration can also be obtained from plant callus, explants, organs, or parts thereof. Such regeneration techniques are described generally in Klee et al. (1987) Ann Rev of Plant Phys 38:467. See also, e.g., Payne and Gamborg.
One of skill will recognize that after the expression cassette containing the Ht1 gene is stably incorporated in transgenic plants and confirmed to be operable, it can be introduced into other plants by sexual crossing. Any of a number of standard breeding techniques can be used, depending upon the species to be crossed.
In some embodiments, the methods comprise introducing by way of expressing in a regenerable maize plant cell a polynucleotide construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, wherein the polynucleotide encodes a resistant allele of the Ht1 gene presented herein, and generating a maize plant that has resistance to northern leaf blight from the maize plant cell. The maize plant generated by the method comprises in its genome the polynucleotide construct. The regulatory sequence may be a promoter and/or a terminator and may be native to maize. In some embodiments, the regulatory sequence is native to the Ht1 gene. A progeny plant comprising the polynucleotide construct may also be generated by crossing the maize plant generated by the method to a second maize plant that does not comprise in its genome the polynucleotide construct. In some embodiments, the Ht1 gene is overexpressed (either as a genomic fragment or cDNA) to impart greater resistance than the level of expression in the native state.
The following examples are offered to illustrate, but not to limit, the appended claims. It is understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that persons skilled in the art will recognize various reagents or parameters that can be altered without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.
A large backcross-derived population was created for fine mapping of a northern leaf blight resistance QTL located on chromosome 2. The population was created from a cross between resistant line PH4GP (score=9) and susceptible line PH5W4 (score=1), and the susceptible line was used as the recurrent parent. BC5 individuals were scored for northern leaf blight infection using the phenotyping method disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,921,646. Marker recombination data from a large set of individuals from population 2 placed the gene in an 18 kb region in the B73 genome, encompassing a putative protein phosphatase 2C, a putative PHD-type zinc finger protein, and a putative disease resistance protein. There is no known EST for the putative disease resistance protein; moreover, based on the B73 predicted gene sequence, the putative disease resistance protein has low, constitutive expression.
A BAC library from resistant donor PH4GP was constructed, and a BAC clone covering the Ht1 interval was identified and sequenced. The Ht1 interval in PH4GP was less than 10 kb, with only a single annotated gene that encodes a putative CC-NB-LRR (coiled-coil, nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat) gene. Ht1 cDNA sequences from PH4GP and from PH1W2 (another source of a resistant allele of Ht1; US2010095395) are represented by SEQ ID NOs:1 and 3, respectively, while the amino acid sequences of the encoded polypeptides are represented by SEQ ID NO:2 and 4. B73 has two splicing variants, and the novel variant expresses at a much higher level (referred to herein as B73-high) than the known variant (referred to herein as B73-low). SEQ ID NO:5 is the cDNA sequence of the B73-high allele, while the amino acid sequence of the encoded polypeptide is represented by SEQ ID NO:6. SEQ ID NO:7 is the cDNA sequence of the B73-low allele, while the amino acid sequence of the encoded polypeptide is represented by SEQ ID NO:8.
A construct containing the genomic sequence of the PH4GP (resistant) allele (SEQ ID NO:9) was generated and transformed into a susceptible transformation line using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The genomic sequence (SEQ ID NO:9) contained the native promoter, exons, intron and terminator regions. Regenerated transgenic plants were planted in a greenhouse, and a quantitative PCR analysis was done to confirm insertion of the T-DNA cassette that contains the genomic sequence of the PH4GP (resistant) allele. Many of the events had a single copy of the T-DNA insert, which was confirmed by qPCR using four flanking markers. Based on the marker data, of the 50 events, 41 were positive for the insert and 9 were negative (null).
All events were tested in the greenhouse for efficacy against the northern leaf blight pathogen (Exserohilum turcicum). First, all events were challenged with race 0 of the pathogen for which Ht1 gene is known to provide resistance; then the events were subjected to race 1, to which Ht1 does not provide resistance. All positive events, as determined by qPCR, were resistant to race 0, and all negative events were susceptible to race 0. As expected, all events were susceptible to race 1.
Northern leaf blight resistant maize plants expressing the maize Ht1 gene can be produced using recombinant DNA-based transformation, for example. Recombinant DNA based transformation methods are well known in the art, e.g. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated and particle bombardment based transformations. With respect to Agrobacterium tumefaciens based plant transformation, vectors are constructed according to methods known in the art. The vectors contain a T-DNA insert having a promoter, an intron, an optional enhancer such as a 35S enhancer element, an Ht1 variant DNA that confers resistance to northern leaf blight, and a plant terminator. Maize immature embryos are excised and infected with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector containing the Ht1 variant of interest. After infection, embryos are transferred and cultured in co-cultivation medium. After co-cultivation, the infected immature embryos are transferred onto media to grow transgenic calli. The putative transgenic callus tissues are sampled using PCR and optionally a Western assay to confirm the presence of the Ht1 variant gene. The putative transgenic callus tissues are maintained on media for further growth and selection before plant regeneration. At regeneration, callus tissue confirmed to be transgenic are transferred onto maturation medium and cultured for somatic embryo maturation. Mature embryos are then transferred onto regeneration medium for shoot and root formation. After shoots and roots emerge, individual plantlets are transferred into tubes with rooting medium. Plantlets with established shoots and roots are transplanted into pots in the greenhouse for further growth and to produce T1 seed.
Furthermore, a DNA construct containing an Ht1 variant DNA that confers resistance to northern leaf blight may also include another gene encoding a polypeptide that confers northern leaf blight resistance, such as the gene encoding for NLB18 (in WO2011163590). Both PH99N and PH26N are maize lines showing resistance to northern leaf blight that reflect different sources of resistance with respect to the chromosome 8 QTL, as described in application WO2011163590. The amino acid sequence of the NLB18 polypeptide from line PH99N is presented herein as SEQ ID NO:11; the amino acid sequence of the NLB18 polypeptide from line PH26N is presented herein as SEQ ID NO:12. The introduction of Ht1 and NLB18 in a plant may have the effect of increasing resistance to race 0 of the Exserohilum turcicum pathogen and/or may provide resistance to an additional race or races (e.g. race 1), for which the Ht1 gene does not provide resistance.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/242,691, filed Oct. 16, 2015, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5844116 | Piper | Dec 1998 | A |
| 6720487 | Hoffbeck | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 8062847 | Broglie | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8921646 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9040772 | Li et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 20100095395 | Wilson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20150315605 | Li et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20210274739 | Hou | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20220275392 | Gao et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2008021225 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2010045211 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2011163590 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2014036048 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| 2015026883 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| 2015026886 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| 2016040030 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| 2021257206 | Dec 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Zuo et al. Nature Genetics (2015) 47(2): 151-158. |
| Qin, Yang et al., “Quantitative Disease Resistance: Dissection and Adoption in Maize”; Molecular Plant; Mar. 2017; vol. 10; pp. 402-413. |
| Schnable, P. S., et al.: “The B73 Maize Genome: Complexity, Diversity, and Dynamics”, Science Magazine (2009) vol. 326, No. 5956, pp. 1112-1115. |
| UniProt Database Accession No. UPI000220E9DC dated Mar. 19, 2013. |
| Yang, et al.: “Quantitative Disease Resistance: Dissection and Adoption in Maize,” Molecular Plant, vol. 10, pp. 402-413. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2016/057081 dated Aug. 2, 2017. |
| Hurni, Severine, et al.: “The maize disease resistance gene Htn1 against northern corn leaf blight encodes a wall-associated receptor-like kinase”, PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Jul. 14, 2015 (Jul. 14, 2015), vol. 112, No. 28. pp. 8780-8785. |
| Li, L. J.; et al.: “The physical location of the gene ht1 (Helminthosporium turcium resistance1) in maize (Zea mays L.)”, Hereditas, 1998, vol. 129, pp. 101-106. |
| Shi, Jinrui, et al.: “ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-CAS9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions”, Plant Biotechnology Journal, Aug. 17, 2016 (Aug. 17, 2016), vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 207-216. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/055835, dated Mar. 13, 2018. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/319,319, dated Sep. 22, 2022. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210000059 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62242691 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15765566 | US | |
| Child | 16903814 | US |
