Generating product recommendations using a blend of collaborative and content-based data

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11023947
  • Patent Number
    11,023,947
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, September 22, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 1, 2021
    3 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 705 026700
    • 705 026000
    • 705 027000
    • CPC
    • G06Q30/0631
    • G06F16/9535
    • G06N5/00
  • International Classifications
    • G06Q30/00
    • G06Q30/06
Abstract
A system for providing product recommendations to online visitors to an e-commerce website is provided. The system may include a product recommendation program comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to generate a list of recommended products for an online visitor based on both (i) user preference data, and (ii) product attribute correlation data.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.


BACKGROUND
1. The Field of the Present Disclosure

The present disclosure relates generally to electronic commerce (“e-commerce”), and more particularly, but not necessarily entirely, to systems and methods for making product recommendations to online consumers.


2. Description of Related Art

An important feature of e-commerce websites is to provide product recommendations to online users. “Collaborative filtering” is one technique of using click or purchase behavior of users to generate product recommendations for other users. In one form, collaborative filtering comprises a matrix with all items represented on the X axis and all of the same items represented on the Y axis. The data points in the matrix comprise the number of users who interacted (by clicking, purchasing, etc.) with both items. The website then keys off one item and uses it to recommend other items highly correlated to it in the user behavior matrix. These user correlations provide very effective recommendations generally accepted to be the most effective on e-commerce websites.


An exemplary matrix 10 used in collaborative filtering is shown in FIG. 1. Products P1-PN are listed along the X axis. The same products, i.e., products P1-PN, are also listed along the Y-axis. The entries in the matrix represent the number of users who interacted with both the corresponding products in both the X and Y axes. Using the matrix, if a user expresses interest in a product on the X axis, other products with the highest recorded interest in the Y axis may be recommended to the user on an e-commerce website.


A disadvantage to this technique is that collaborative filtering only works when a statistically useful volume of users has interacted with the item. That is, an e-commerce website is unable to use collaborative filtering for some products due to lack of reliable data.


“Content-based recommendations” is another technique for recommending products to users. Content-based recommendations work off of a similar methodology as collaborative filtering but are somewhat more complex. In one form, the technique comprises a matrix stored in a database of all items but, instead of matching the item by correlation with user interest, it matches by correlation of item attributes (brand, price range, color, size, material, use, etc.). The website recommends those products that are most similar to the product(s) that the user has purchased or expressed an interest in. Accordingly, the various product attributes must be properly weighted so that the important attributes, from the viewpoint of the users, are assigned a higher worth.


Referring to FIG. 2, there is depicted an exemplary matrix 12 used in content-based recommendations. Products P1-PN are listed along the X axis. The same products, i.e., products P1-PN, are also listed along the Y axis. The entries in the matrix represent the number of similar product attributes between two products. Using the matrix, if a user expresses interest in a product in the X axis, other products with the highest number of similar attributes in the Y axis may be recommended to the user on an e-commerce website.


Advantageously, using content-based recommendations product recommendations can be generated for any item in the absence of historical user interaction. A major flaw, however, in this technique is that product attributes that attract a user's interest are often hard to classify in a systematic way. This makes the output of this technique useful, but often inferior, to product recommendations directly driven by user behavior through collaborative filtering.


It would be an improvement over the prior art to provide novel systems, methods, and computer-readable media that generate product recommendations to online users that provide the benefits of both collaborative filtering and content-based recommendations.


The prior art is thus characterized by several disadvantages that are addressed by the present disclosure. The present disclosure minimizes, and in some aspects eliminates, the above-mentioned failures, and other problems, by utilizing the systems, methods, computer-readable media and structural features described herein.


The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the present disclosure without undue experimentation. The features and advantages of the present disclosure may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of the disclosure will become apparent from a consideration of the subsequent detailed description presented in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary data matrix for use in collaborative-based recommendations;



FIG. 2 depicted an exemplary data matrix used in content-based recommendations;



FIG. 3 is as block diagram of a product recommendation system according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 4 depicts an exemplary data matrix generated by a product recommendation system according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure; and



FIG. 5 depicts a flow diagram of a process for providing product recommendations according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles in accordance with the disclosure, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe them. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and any additional applications of the principles of the disclosure as illustrated herein, which would normally occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the disclosure claimed.


In describing and claiming the present disclosure, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” “characterized by,” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive or open-ended terms that do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.


Referring now to FIG. 3, there is depicted a product recommendation system 20 for providing product recommendations to users. According to examples of embodiments of the present invention, the system 20 can be positioned to provide product recommendations on an online retailer/wholesaler website, sometimes referred to as an e-commerce website. For example, such a system 20 can include an online retailer or wholesale services e-commerce server. The system 20 may further include a product recommendation server 21 that includes a processor 22 and memory 23. One or more second computers, e.g., user computers 27, positioned remotely from and in communication with the product recommendation server 21 through an electronic communication network 30 such as the Internet or other internetwork. It will be appreciated that other intervening servers, such as an e-commerce server, may be interposed between the server 21 and the user computers 27.


The system 20 can also include a product recommendation program 24 stored on a tangible computer medium, such as, for example, one or more various types of memory, such as, for example, memory 23 of the server 21. The program 24 may contain instructions, that when executed by the processor 22, cause the server 21 to recommend products to users on the remote computers 27. The system 20 can also include a plurality of database servers (not shown) that warehouse data regarding e-commerce conducted through the system 20.


As understood by those skilled in the art, the memory 23 of the server 21 can include volatile and nonvolatile memory known to those skilled in the art including, for example, RAM, ROM, and magnetic or optical disks, just to name a few. It should also be understood by those skilled in the art that, although illustrated as a single server, the illustrated configuration of the server 21 is given by way of example and that other types of servers or computers configured according to various other methodologies known to those skilled in the art can be used. The server 21 shown schematically in FIG. 3 represents a server or server cluster or server farm and is not limited to any individual physical server. The server 21 may be part of a server cluster that provides an e-commerce website accessible from user computers 27. The server site may be deployed as a server farm or server cluster managed by a server-hosting provider. The number of servers and their architecture and configuration may be increased based on usage, demand, and capacity requirements for the system 20.


Similarly, the database servers (not shown) each represent a server or server cluster or server farm and are not limited to any individual physical server or configuration. As also understood by those skilled in the art, user computers 27 in these embodiments can be a laptop, desktop, personal digital assistants or PDAs, cell phones, servers, computers, smart phones, internet-enabled devices, or other types of computers.


As known and understood by those skilled in the art, the network 30 can include an internet or world wide web of a plurality of computers/servers in communication with one or more other computers through a communication network, and/or portions of a local or other area network.


As further understood by those skilled in the art, the program 24 can be in the form of microcode, programs, routines, and symbolic languages that provide a specific set or sets of ordered operations that control the functioning of the hardware and direct its operation. The program 24, according to an illustrative embodiment of the present invention, also need not reside in its entirety in volatile memory, but can be selectively loaded, as necessary, according to various methodologies as known and understood by those skilled in the art. As further understood by those skilled in the art, the term “computer-readable medium” encompasses distribution media, intermediate storage media, execution memory of a computer, and any other medium or device capable of storing the program 24 implementing the functionality or processes of various embodiments of the present invention for later reading by a computer.


The program 24 can be copied from the computer-readable medium to a hard disk or a similar intermediate storage medium. When the program 24, or portions thereof, is to be run, it can be loaded either from its distribution medium or its intermediate storage medium into the execution memory of the computer, configuring the computer to act in accordance with the functionality or method of various embodiments of this invention. All such operations are well known to those skilled in the art of computer systems.


According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the product recommendation program 24 can include a set of instructions that, when executed by the processor 22, cause the server 21, to perform the operations of: providing a user one or more product recommendations regarding products for sale on an e-commerce website. The product recommendations may be displayed to users on the remote computers 27 on a webpage, as viewed, for example, on a display 26 of one or more remote user computers 27, through the communication network 30, e.g., Internet.


Product Recommendation


To generate product recommendations, the program 24 causes the server 21 to maintain, in an electronic database, user preference data that may include a product matrix generated using collaborative filtering. An exemplary product matrix 10 representing collaborative filtering is depicted in FIG. 1. In particular, the collaborative matrix represents all products on the X axis and all products on the Y axis. The data points in the matrix comprise the number of users who interacted (by clicking, purchasing, viewing, etc.) with both products. For example, a user that purchased one product also purchased another product.


The program 24 further causes the server 21 to further maintain, in an electronic database, attribute correlation data that may include a product matrix generated using product attributes. The attribute correlation data comprise an attribute-based matrix representing all products but, instead of matching the product by correlation of user interest, it matches according to correlation of item attributes (brand, price range, color, size, material, etc.). That is, the attribute correlation data indicate similarity of products based on their product attributes. An exemplary attribute-based matrix 12 is shown in FIG. 2.


The program 24 then causes the server 21 to form a blended matrix by combining the user preference data and the attribute correlation data. In particular, the program 24, when executed by the processor 22, may first normalize the collaborative matrix and the attribute-based matrix so that the measures of attribute similarity can be combined and appropriately weighted with measures of user preference correlations.


When blended together appropriately, wherever there is strong user preference data, those correlations will drive the recommendations with only minor input from other users. Where there is a weak collaborative filtering correlation or no collaborative filtering data, the product attributes play a larger role and improve the quality of recommendations for less popular products.


It will be appreciated that a significant obstacle in blending the output of two different similarity measures (such as the output of an item-item collaborative filter & a content-based recommender) is that of distribution and scale. Some degree of normalization is desirable to preserve the strongest relationships under both measures for presentation to the user. Two exemplary algorithms to achieve this result are included below.


Algorithm I: Simple Scaling


Consider the output of some finite number of similarity calculations a, b, . . . , ordered from “most similar” to “least similar.” Without loss of generality, it may be assumed that the largest measures are most similar (in the alternate case one may apply an appropriate transformation to the output scores.) Select the first n recommendations in each case and label their scores a1, . . . , an, b1, . . . , bn, . . . . Up to n missing values are allowable in each output (n may be different for each similarity output), as they will be accounted for in the scaling. Consider each of the n-dimensional vectors a, b, . . . (including potentially missing coordinates) as columns of matrix S. For each column of S do the following:

    • 1. Center each column: for column x, subtract the mean value of column x from each entry (x=x−x).
    • 2. Scale each column: For column x divide each entry by the root mean square error for the column






(



x


=





i




x
~

i
2



n
-
1




,






where the n non-missing values in vector x are the xi).

    • 3. Assemble a new matrix whose columns are the vectors constructed in (2).


Each of the columns is now on the same scale, and one may now select the largest outputs from each algorithm for presentation as a blended algorithm.


Algorithm II: Quantile Normalization


As above, consider the output of some finite number of similarity calculations a, b, . . . , ordered from “most similar” to “least similar.” Without loss of generality, it may be assumed that largest measures are most similar (in the alternate case one may apply an appropriate transformation to the output scores.) Select the first n recommendations in each case and label their scores a1, . . . , an, b1, . . . , bn, . . . . If missing values exist, then the outputs should either be filled with 0-score entries to pad all algorithm outputs to the same length, or one should truncate all outputs to the length of the shortest output list. Again, organize these into a matrix where the output scores are the columns.

    • 1. For each column, assign the rank (from largest to smallest) of each score. Retain these ranks for later use.
    • 2. Rearrange each column such that it ranges from largest to smallest.
    • 3. Calculate the arithmetic mean of each row to determine the row rank (again, from largest to smallest).
    • 4. From (1), replace each value by the value for its rank calculated in (3).


      After applying this method, each column is now drawn from an identical distribution and the largest scores may be selected for presentation to a user as a blended algorithm.


Referring now to FIG. 4, there is depicted an exemplary matrix 100 generated from combining collaborative-based data and attribute correlation data. The matrix 100 has all products, P1-PN, represented on the X axis and all of the same products represented on the Y axis. The data points in the matrix 100 represent normalized user relevance values between the products, P1-PN. Using the matrix 100, an e-commerce website keys off one item and uses it to recommend other items highly relevant to it in the matrix 100. That is, the product in the column with the highest user relevance value is recommend to a user.


Referring now to FIG. 5, there is depicted a flow diagram depicting a process 200 for combining collaborative-based data and attribute correlation data. The process 200 may be performed by the processor 22 when executing the instructions contained in the program 24. At step 202, the process 200 provides user preference data and attribute correlation data for a catalog of products offered for sale on an e-commerce website. At step 204, the process 200 normalizes the user preference data and attribute correlation data. At step 206, the process 200 combines the normalized user preference data and attribute correlation data to generate product recommendation data. In an illustrative embodiment, the process 200 stores the product recommendation data in a table or matrix defined in a database stored on an electronic storage medium. At step 208, the process 200 determines a user's interest in a first product based on the user's interactions with an e-commerce website. For example, the interaction may include the user placing the first product in an e-shopping cart for purchase or viewing an online product listing for the first product or purchasing the first product. At step 210, the process 200 recommends a second product based on the first product and the product recommendation data. For example, the process 200 may display the second product, in the form of an advertisement, to the user on a webpage of an e-commerce website.


According to an illustrative embodiment, the present disclosure provides a system for providing product recommendations to a user of an e-commerce website, said system comprising: a processor; a memory coupled to the processor; computer-readable instructions stored in the memory, that when executed by the processor, cause the processor to generate product recommendations based on both (i) user preference data, and (ii) product attribute correlation data. The present disclosure further provides the system described above, wherein the computer-readable instructions are further operable, when executed, to cause the processor to track users' website interactions. The present disclosure further provides the system described above, wherein the user preference data are generated using collaborative filtering. The present disclosure further provides the system described above, wherein the user preference data are based on user purchases. The present disclosure further provides the system described above, wherein the user preference data are based on user interactions with an e-commerce website. The present disclosure further provides the system described above, wherein the product attribute data are based on similar product attributes of products offered for sale online. The present disclosure further provides the system described above, wherein the product attributes comprise one or more of: brand information, price information, color information, and size information. The present disclosure further provides the system described above, wherein the product recommendations comprise products offered for sale through an e-commerce website.


According to an illustrative embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method of providing product recommendations to a user of an e-commerce website, the method comprising: processing user interactions with product data to generate user preference data; processing product attribute data to generate product attribute correlation data; processing the user preference data and the product attribute correlation data to generate product recommendation data; and generating a product recommendation for the user based on the product recommendation data. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, wherein the user interactions comprises one of clicks and views. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, wherein the product data define product listings regarding products offered for sale on an e-commerce website. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, wherein the product attribute data comprise information regarding similar product attributes of products offered for sale on the e-commerce website. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, wherein the product attributes comprise one or more of: brand information, price information, color information, and size information. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, further comprising storing the product recommendation data in a table or matrix. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, further comprising displaying the product recommendation on a webpage on a display of the user device. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, further comprising normalizing the user preference data and the product attribute correlation data. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, wherein the product attribute data comprise one or more of: brand information, price information, color information, and size information. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, wherein the product recommendation comprises at least one product offered for sale on the e-commerce website. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, wherein the product data comprise product listing information for products offered for sale on the e-commerce website. The present disclosure further provides the method described above, further comprising tracking user interactions with the product data.


Those having ordinary skill in the relevant art will appreciate the advantages provided by the features of the present disclosure. For example, it is a feature of the present disclosure to provide product recommendations to online visitors of an e-commerce website.


In the foregoing Detailed Description, various features of the present disclosure are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description of the Disclosure by this reference, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of the present disclosure.


It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present disclosure. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, and the appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present disclosure has been shown in the drawings and described above with particularity and detail, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system for creating a list of product recommendations for a user of an e-commerce website, said system comprising: a processor;a memory coupled to the processor;computer-readable instructions stored in the memory, that when executed by the processor, cause the processor to generate product recommendations based on (i) user preference data, (ii) product attribute correlation data generated from product attribute data which are generated from a comparison of attribute similarities between products, wherein the processor also normalizes the user preference data to generate normalized user preference data, normalizes the product attribute correlation data to generate normalized product attribute correlation data, and combines the normalized user preference data and the normalized product attribute correlation data to generate product recommendation data, and (iii) a user interest in a first product on the e-commerce website; andwherein the list of product recommendations is based on the generated product recommendation data and the user interest in the first product on the e-commerce website,wherein the user preference data include a product matrix generated using collaborative filtering, andwherein the product attribute data comprise a product attribute matrix generated by correlating similar product attributes between products, andwherein computer-readable instructions stored in the memory, that when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to provide a user who indicated the user interest in the first product at least one product recommendation from the list of product recommendations on a remote computer on a webpage.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer-readable instructions are further operable, when executed, to cause the processor to track users' website interactions.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the user preference data are generated using collaborative filtering.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the user preference data are based on user purchases.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the user preference data are based on user interactions with the e-commerce website.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the product attribute correlation data are based on product attributes of products offered for sale online.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the product attribute correlation data include product attributes, wherein the product attributes comprise one or more of: brand information, price information, color information, and size information.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the product recommendations comprise products offered for sale through the e-commerce website.
  • 9. A method of creating a list of product recommendations for a user of an e-commerce website, the method comprising: processing user interactions with product data to generate user preference data;normalizing the user preference data to generate normalized user preference data;processing product attribute data, generated from a comparison of attribute similarities between products, to generate product attribute correlation data;normalizing the product attribute correlation data to generate normalized product attribute correlation data;combining the normalized user preference data and the normalized product attribute correlation data to generate product recommendation data;determining a user interest on the e-commerce website in a first product;generating at least one product recommendation for the user based on the product recommendation data and the user interest on the e-commerce website in the first product; andcreating the list of product recommendations based on the generated at least one product recommendation and the user interest on the e-commerce website in the first product; anddisplaying at least one product recommendation from the list of product recommendations on a remote computer on a webpage for a user who indicated the user interest in the first product,wherein the user preference data include a product matrix generated using collaborative filtering, andwherein the product attribute data comprise a product attribute matrix generated by correlating product attributes between products.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the user interactions comprise one of clicks and views.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, wherein the product data define product listings regarding products offered for sale on the e-commerce website.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the product attribute correlation data comprise information regarding product attributes of products offered for sale on the e-commerce website.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the product attributes comprise one or more of: brand information, price information, color information, and size information.
  • 14. The method of claim 9, further comprising storing the product recommendation data in a table or matrix.
  • 15. The method of claim 9, further comprising displaying the list of product recommendations on a webpage on a display of a user device.
  • 16. The method of claim 9, wherein the product attribute data comprise one or more of: brand information, price information, color information, and size information.
  • 17. The method of claim 9, wherein the product recommendation comprises at least one product offered for sale on the e-commerce website.
  • 18. The method of claim 9, wherein the product data comprise product listing information for products offered for sale on the e-commerce website.
  • 19. The method of claim 9, further comprising tracking user interactions with the product data.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/213,741 filed on Mar. 14, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/798,813, filed Mar. 15, 2013, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties, including but not limited to those portions that specifically appear hereinafter, the incorporation by reference being made with the following exception: In the event that any portions of the above-referenced applications are inconsistent with this application, this application supercedes said above-referenced application.

US Referenced Citations (528)
Number Name Date Kind
3573747 Adams et al. Apr 1971 A
3581072 Nymeyer May 1971 A
4412287 Braddock, III Oct 1983 A
4674044 Kalmus et al. Jun 1987 A
4677552 Sibley, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4789928 Fujisaki Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4808987 Takeda et al. Feb 1989 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4854516 Yamada Aug 1989 A
4903201 Wagner Feb 1990 A
RE33316 Katsuta et al. Aug 1990 E
5027110 Chang et al. Jun 1991 A
5053956 Donald et al. Oct 1991 A
5063507 Lindsey et al. Nov 1991 A
5077665 Silverman et al. Dec 1991 A
5101353 Lupien et al. Mar 1992 A
5136501 Silverman et al. Aug 1992 A
5168446 Wiseman Dec 1992 A
5205200 Wright Apr 1993 A
5243515 Lee Sep 1993 A
5258908 Hartheimer et al. Nov 1993 A
5280422 Moe et al. Jan 1994 A
5297031 Gutterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297032 Trojan et al. Mar 1994 A
5301350 Rogan et al. Apr 1994 A
5305200 Hartheimer et al. Apr 1994 A
5325297 Bird et al. Jun 1994 A
5329589 Fraser et al. Jul 1994 A
5347632 Filepp et al. Sep 1994 A
5375055 Togher et al. Dec 1994 A
5377354 Scannell et al. Dec 1994 A
5394324 Clearwater Feb 1995 A
5407433 Loomas Apr 1995 A
5411483 Loomas et al. May 1995 A
5426281 Abecassis Jun 1995 A
5485510 Colbert Jan 1996 A
5493677 Balogh et al. Feb 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5557728 Garrett et al. Sep 1996 A
5579471 Barber et al. Nov 1996 A
5596994 Bro Jan 1997 A
5598557 Doner et al. Jan 1997 A
5621790 Grossman et al. Apr 1997 A
5640569 Miller et al. Jun 1997 A
5657389 Houvener Aug 1997 A
5664111 Nahan et al. Sep 1997 A
5664115 Fraser Sep 1997 A
5689652 Lupien et al. Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5706457 Dwyer et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5715402 Popolo Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5721908 Lagarde et al. Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5727165 Ordish et al. Mar 1998 A
5737599 Rowe et al. Apr 1998 A
5760917 Sheridan Jun 1998 A
5761496 Hattori Jun 1998 A
5761655 Hoffman Jun 1998 A
5761662 Dasan Jun 1998 A
5771291 Newton et al. Jun 1998 A
5771380 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5778367 Wesinger, Jr. et al. Jul 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794216 Brown Aug 1998 A
5794219 Brown Aug 1998 A
5796395 de Hond Aug 1998 A
5799285 Klingman Aug 1998 A
5803500 Mossberg Sep 1998 A
5818914 Fujisaki Oct 1998 A
5826244 Huberman Oct 1998 A
5835896 Fisher et al. Nov 1998 A
5845266 Lupien et al. Dec 1998 A
5850442 Muftic Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova et al. Feb 1999 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5873069 Reuhl et al. Feb 1999 A
5873080 Coden et al. Feb 1999 A
5884056 Steele Mar 1999 A
5890138 Godin et al. Mar 1999 A
5890175 Wong et al. Mar 1999 A
5905975 Ausubel May 1999 A
5907547 Foladare et al. May 1999 A
5913215 Rubinstein et al. Jun 1999 A
5922074 Richard et al. Jul 1999 A
5924072 Havens Jul 1999 A
5926794 Fethe Jul 1999 A
5948040 DeLorme et al. Sep 1999 A
5948061 Merriman et al. Sep 1999 A
5974396 Anderson Oct 1999 A
5974412 Hazlehurst et al. Oct 1999 A
5986662 Argiro et al. Nov 1999 A
5987446 Corey et al. Nov 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
5999915 Nahan et al. Dec 1999 A
6012053 Pant et al. Jan 2000 A
6029141 Bezos et al. Feb 2000 A
6035288 Solomon Mar 2000 A
6035402 Vaeth et al. Mar 2000 A
6044363 Mori et al. Mar 2000 A
6045447 Yoshizawa et al. Apr 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6049797 Guha et al. Apr 2000 A
6055518 Franklin et al. Apr 2000 A
6058379 Odom et al. May 2000 A
6058417 Hess et al. May 2000 A
6058428 Wang et al. May 2000 A
6061448 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6065041 Lum et al. May 2000 A
6070125 Murphy et al. May 2000 A
6073117 Oyanagi et al. Jun 2000 A
6078914 Redfem Jun 2000 A
6085176 Woolston Jul 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6119137 Smith et al. Sep 2000 A
6128649 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6141010 Hoyle Oct 2000 A
6167382 Sparks et al. Dec 2000 A
6178408 Copple et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185558 Bowman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192407 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199077 Inala et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202051 Woolston Mar 2001 B1
6202061 Khosla et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226412 Schwab May 2001 B1
6243691 Fisher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6269238 Iggulden Jul 2001 B1
6271840 Finseth et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275820 Navin-Chandra et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275829 Angiulo et al. Aug 2001 B1
6356879 Aggarwal et al. Mar 2002 B2
6356905 Gershman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356908 Brown et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366899 Kernz Apr 2002 B1
6370527 Singhai Apr 2002 B1
6373933 Sarkki et al. Apr 2002 B1
6374260 Hoffert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381510 Amidhozour et al. Apr 2002 B1
6415270 Rackson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6415320 Hess et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434556 Levin et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456307 Bates et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460020 Pool et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466917 Goyal et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484149 Jammes et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489968 Ortega et al. Dec 2002 B1
6522955 Colborn Feb 2003 B1
6523037 Monahan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6601061 Holt et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604107 Wang Aug 2003 B1
6625764 Dawson Sep 2003 B1
6643696 Davis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6661431 Stuart et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665838 Brown et al. Dec 2003 B1
6675178 Chinchar et al. Jan 2004 B1
6694436 Audebert Feb 2004 B1
6701310 Sugiura et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718536 Dupaquis Apr 2004 B2
6725268 Jackel et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728704 Mao et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732161 Hess et al. May 2004 B1
6732162 Wood et al. May 2004 B1
6801909 Delgado Oct 2004 B2
6856693 Hurwitz Feb 2005 B2
6889054 Himmel et al. May 2005 B2
6907401 Vittal et al. Jun 2005 B1
6912505 Linden et al. Jun 2005 B2
6978273 Bonneau et al. Dec 2005 B1
7043450 Velez et al. May 2006 B2
7069242 Sheth et al. Jun 2006 B1
7076453 Jammes et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076504 Handel et al. Jul 2006 B1
7080030 Elgen et al. Jul 2006 B2
7100111 McElfresh et al. Aug 2006 B2
7100195 Underwood Aug 2006 B1
7117207 Kerschberg et al. Oct 2006 B1
7127416 Tenorio Oct 2006 B1
7165091 Lunenfeld Jan 2007 B2
7167910 Farnham et al. Jan 2007 B2
7216115 Walters et al. May 2007 B1
7240016 Sturgis et al. Jul 2007 B1
7254547 Beck et al. Aug 2007 B1
7318037 Solari Jan 2008 B2
7324966 Scheer Jan 2008 B2
7340249 Moran et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349668 Ilan et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353188 Yim et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366755 Cuomo et al. Apr 2008 B1
7379890 Myr et al. May 2008 B2
7380217 Gvelesiani May 2008 B2
7383320 Silbertstein et al. Jun 2008 B1
7401025 Lokitz Jul 2008 B1
7447646 Agarwal et al. Nov 2008 B1
7451476 Banks et al. Nov 2008 B1
7454464 Puthenkulam et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457730 Degnan Nov 2008 B2
7493521 Li et al. Feb 2009 B1
7496525 Mitchell Feb 2009 B1
7496527 Silverstein et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496582 Farnham et al. Feb 2009 B2
7516094 Perkowski Apr 2009 B2
7539696 Greener et al. May 2009 B1
7546625 Kamangar Jun 2009 B1
7552067 Nephew et al. Jun 2009 B2
7565615 Ebert Jul 2009 B2
7606743 Orzell et al. Oct 2009 B2
7610212 Klett et al. Oct 2009 B2
7653573 Hayes, Jr. et al. Jan 2010 B2
7834883 Adams Nov 2010 B2
7904348 Johnson et al. Mar 2011 B2
7912748 Rosenberg et al. Mar 2011 B1
7921031 Crysel et al. Apr 2011 B2
7941751 Ebert May 2011 B2
7979340 MacDonald Korth et al. Jul 2011 B2
7983950 DeVita Jul 2011 B2
7983963 Byrne et al. Jul 2011 B2
8086643 Tenorio Dec 2011 B1
8112303 Eglen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8140989 Cohen et al. Mar 2012 B2
8204799 Murray et al. Jun 2012 B1
8214264 Kasavin Jul 2012 B2
8214804 Robertson Jul 2012 B2
8260852 Cselle Sep 2012 B1
8312056 Peng et al. Nov 2012 B1
8326662 Byrne et al. Dec 2012 B1
8370269 MacDonald-Korth et al. Feb 2013 B2
8370435 Bonefas et al. Feb 2013 B1
8452691 MacDonald Korth et al. May 2013 B2
8473316 Panzitta et al. Jun 2013 B1
8494912 Fraser et al. Jul 2013 B2
8545265 Sakamoto et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577740 Murray et al. Nov 2013 B1
8583480 Byrne Nov 2013 B2
8630960 Gross Jan 2014 B2
8676632 Watson et al. Mar 2014 B1
8693494 Fiatal Apr 2014 B2
8719075 MacDonald Korth et al. May 2014 B2
8793650 Hilerio et al. Jul 2014 B2
9047341 Pan Jun 2015 B2
9047642 Byrne et al. Jun 2015 B2
9448692 Mierau et al. Sep 2016 B1
9483788 Martin Nov 2016 B2
9741080 Byrne Aug 2017 B1
9747622 Johnson et al. Aug 2017 B1
9805425 MacDonald-Korth et al. Oct 2017 B2
9928752 Byrne et al. Mar 2018 B2
9940659 Behbahani et al. Apr 2018 B1
10074118 Johnson et al. Sep 2018 B1
10102287 Martin Oct 2018 B2
10269081 Byrne Apr 2019 B1
10423997 MacDonald Korth et al. Sep 2019 B2
20010014868 Herz et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010034667 Petersen Oct 2001 A1
20010034668 Whitworth Oct 2001 A1
20010044751 Pugliese et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047290 Petras et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047308 Kaminsky et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010051996 Cooper et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002513 Chiasson Jan 2002 A1
20020007356 Rice et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013721 Capel et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019763 Linden Feb 2002 A1
20020022995 Miller et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020023059 Bari et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026390 Ulenas et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029187 Meehan et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038312 Donner et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020040352 McCormick Apr 2002 A1
20020042738 Srinivasan et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049622 Lettich et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020056044 Andersson May 2002 A1
20020099578 Eicher et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099579 Scelzo et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099602 Moskowitz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107718 Morrill et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107853 Hofmann Aug 2002 A1
20020111826 Potter et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120537 Morea et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120609 Lang Aug 2002 A1
20020123957 Notarius et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020124100 Adams Sep 2002 A1
20020129282 Hopkins Sep 2002 A1
20020133502 Rosenthal et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138399 Hayes et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147625 Kolke Oct 2002 A1
20020156802 Takayama et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161648 Mason et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161664 Shaya Oct 2002 A1
20020188777 Kraft et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194049 Boyd Dec 2002 A1
20020198784 Shaak et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198882 Linden Dec 2002 A1
20030004855 Dutta et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005046 Kavanagh et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009362 Cifani et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009392 Perkowski Jan 2003 A1
20030014400 Siegel Jan 2003 A1
20030028605 Millett et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032409 Hutcheson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030035138 Schilling Feb 2003 A1
20030036914 Fitzpatrick et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040970 Miller Feb 2003 A1
20030041008 Grey et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046149 Wong Mar 2003 A1
20030069740 Zeidman Apr 2003 A1
20030069790 Kane Apr 2003 A1
20030069825 Burk et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083961 Bezos May 2003 A1
20030088467 Culver May 2003 A1
20030088511 Karboulonis et al. May 2003 A1
20030093331 Childs et al. May 2003 A1
20030097352 Gutta et al. May 2003 A1
20030105682 Dicker Jun 2003 A1
20030110100 Wirth, Jr. Jun 2003 A1
20030119492 Timmins et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030131095 Kumhyr et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139969 Scroggie et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140007 Kramer et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140121 Adams Jul 2003 A1
20030158792 Perkowski Aug 2003 A1
20030163340 Fitzpatrick et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167213 Jammes et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030167222 Mehrotra et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177103 Ivanov et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187745 Hobday et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200156 Roseman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204449 Kotas et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030217002 Enborg Nov 2003 A1
20040006509 Mannik et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015416 Foster et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040029567 Timmins et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040041836 Zaner et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044563 Stein Mar 2004 A1
20040055017 Delpuch et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040058710 Timmins et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073476 Donahue et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078388 Melman Apr 2004 A1
20040107136 Nemirofsky et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117242 Conrad et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122083 Lippert et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122681 Ruvolo et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122735 Meshkin Jun 2004 A1
20040122855 Ruvolo et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128183 Challey et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128283 Wang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128320 Grove et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143731 Audebert et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148232 Fushimi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172323 Stamm Sep 2004 A1
20040172379 Mott et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174979 Hutton et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186766 Fellenstein et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199496 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199905 Fagin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204989 Dicker et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204991 Monahan et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230989 Macey et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040240642 Crandell et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249727 Cook, Jr. et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267717 Slackman Dec 2004 A1
20050010925 Khawand et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021666 Dinnage et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038733 Foster et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044254 Smith Feb 2005 A1
20050055306 Miller et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060664 Rogers Mar 2005 A1
20050097204 Horowitz et al. May 2005 A1
20050114229 Ackley et al. May 2005 A1
20050120311 Thrall Jun 2005 A1
20050131837 Sanctis et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144064 Calabria et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050193333 Ebert Sep 2005 A1
20050197846 Pezaris et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197950 Moya et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198031 Pezaris et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202390 Allen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203888 Woolsey et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216300 Appelman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050262067 Lee et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050273378 MacDonald-Korth et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009994 Hogg et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010105 Sarukkai et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015498 Sarmiento et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060031240 Eyal et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041638 Whittaker et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060058048 Kapoor et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069623 MacDonald-Korth et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060085251 Greene Apr 2006 A1
20060173817 Chowdhury et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206479 Mason Sep 2006 A1
20060230035 Bailey et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235752 Kavanagh et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259360 Flinn et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271671 Hansen Nov 2006 A1
20060282304 Bedard Dec 2006 A1
20070005424 Arauz Jan 2007 A1
20070027760 Collins et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027814 Tuoriniemi Feb 2007 A1
20070073641 Perry et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070077025 Mino Apr 2007 A1
20070078726 MacDonald Korth et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070078849 Slothouber Apr 2007 A1
20070083437 Hamor Apr 2007 A1
20070094597 Rostom Apr 2007 A1
20070100803 Cava May 2007 A1
20070160345 Sakai et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162379 Skinner Jul 2007 A1
20070174108 Monster Jul 2007 A1
20070192168 Van Luchene Aug 2007 A1
20070192181 Asdourian Aug 2007 A1
20070206606 Coleman et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214048 Chan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226679 Jayamohan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233565 Herzog et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239534 Liu et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245013 Saraswathy et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070260520 Jha et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282666 Afeyan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288298 Gutierrez et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299743 Staib et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080015938 Haddad et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021763 Merchant Jan 2008 A1
20080052152 Yufik Feb 2008 A1
20080071640 Nguyen Mar 2008 A1
20080082394 Floyd et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103893 Nagarajan et al. May 2008 A1
20080120342 Reed et al. May 2008 A1
20080126205 Evans et al. May 2008 A1
20080126476 Nicholas et al. May 2008 A1
20080133305 Yates et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140765 Kelaita et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162574 Gilbert Jul 2008 A1
20080201218 Broder et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215456 West et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080288338 Wiseman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294536 Taylor et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080300909 Rikhtverchik et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080301009 Plaster et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080305869 Konforty et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313010 Jepson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006190 Lucash et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030755 Altberg et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030775 Vieri Jan 2009 A1
20090037355 Brave Feb 2009 A1
20090106080 Carrier et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106127 Purdy et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090110181 Koenig et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119167 Kendall et al. May 2009 A1
20090157537 Miller Jun 2009 A1
20090164323 Byrne Jun 2009 A1
20090164442 Shani Jun 2009 A1
20090182589 Kendall et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204848 Kube et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090222348 Ransom et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090222737 Liesche Sep 2009 A1
20090228918 Rolff Sep 2009 A1
20090234722 Evevsky Sep 2009 A1
20090240582 Sheldon-Neal et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090276284 Yost Nov 2009 A1
20090276305 Clopp Nov 2009 A1
20090292677 Kim Nov 2009 A1
20090293019 Raffel et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090313173 Singh et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100042684 Broms et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070448 Omoigui Mar 2010 A1
20100076816 Phillips Mar 2010 A1
20100076851 Jewell, Jr. Mar 2010 A1
20100094673 Lobo et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100107123 Sareen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100145831 Esfandiari et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100146413 Yu Jun 2010 A1
20100228617 Ransom et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110010656 Mokotov Jan 2011 A1
20110055054 Glasson Mar 2011 A1
20110060621 Weller et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110103699 Ke et al. May 2011 A1
20110145226 Gollapudi Jun 2011 A1
20110153383 Bhattacharjya et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153663 Koren Jun 2011 A1
20110173076 Eggleston et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110196802 Ellis et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110225050 Varghese Sep 2011 A1
20110231226 Golden Sep 2011 A1
20110231383 Smyth et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110258049 Ramer et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110271204 Jones et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276513 Erhart et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110289068 Teevan et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120005187 Chavanne Jan 2012 A1
20120030067 Pothukuchi et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120084135 Nissan et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120158715 Maghoul et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164619 Meer Jun 2012 A1
20120166299 Heinstein et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120203723 Huang Aug 2012 A1
20120231424 Calman et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120278388 Kleinbart et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284336 Schmidt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120323725 Johnston Dec 2012 A1
20130073392 Allen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080200 Connolly et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080426 Chen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130085893 Bhardwaj et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130144870 Gupta et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130145254 Masuko et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151331 Avner et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151388 Falkenborg et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130185164 Pottjegort Jul 2013 A1
20130191409 Zeng Jul 2013 A1
20130254059 Teo Sep 2013 A1
20130268561 Christie et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140019313 Hu Jan 2014 A1
20140025509 Reisz et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032544 Mathieu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140114680 Mills et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140136290 Schiestl et al. May 2014 A1
20140172652 Pobbathi et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180758 Agarwal Jun 2014 A1
20140200959 Sarb et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140259056 Grusd Sep 2014 A1
20140289005 Laing et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140330709 Tavares Nov 2014 A1
20150089524 Cremonesi Mar 2015 A1
20150287066 Wortley et al. Oct 2015 A1
20170344622 Islam et al. Nov 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
2253543 Oct 1997 CA
2347812 May 2000 CA
0636993 Apr 1999 EP
0807891 May 2000 EP
1241603 Mar 2001 EP
2397400 Jul 2004 GB
2424098 Sep 2006 GB
2001283083 Oct 2001 JP
9717663 May 1997 WO
9832289 Jul 1998 WO
9847082 Oct 1998 WO
9849641 Nov 1998 WO
9959283 Nov 1999 WO
0025218 May 2000 WO
0109803 Feb 2001 WO
0182135 Nov 2001 WO
2001097099 Dec 2001 WO
2002037234 Nov 2002 WO
2003094080 Nov 2003 WO
WO2007021920 Feb 2007 WO
2012093410 Jul 2012 WO
WO2015116038 Aug 2015 WO
WO2015176071 Nov 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (108)
Entry
Hybrid algorithms for recommending new items, Cremonesi et al., ResearchGate, Google, (Year: 2011).
McGinnity, “Build Your Weapon,” PC Magazine, Apr. 24, 2011, printed from www.pcmag.com/print_article2?0,1217,a%253D3955,00.asp.
Meade, “Visual 360: a performance appraisal system that's ‘fun,’” HR Magazine, 44, 7, 118(3), Jul. 1999.
“Mediappraise: Mediappraise Receives National Award for Web-Based Technology That Enables Companies to Solve Thorny HR Problem,” Dec. 14, 1998.
Medvinsky et al., “Electronic Currency for the Internet,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
metails.com, www.metails.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter and p. 33.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter, back matter, and pp. 479, 486.
Neches, “Fast—A Research Project in Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 4 pages, vol. 3., No. 3.
Neo, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Dec. 1992, pp. 278-288, vol. 1, No. 5.
O'Mahony, “An X.500-based Product Catalogue,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
“Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online: Unique Internet retail services debuts with week-long charity auction for The Computer Museum in Boston,” May 24, 1995, printed from www.dialogweb.com/cgi/dwclient?dwcommand,DWEBPRINT%20810-489267.
“Onsale joins fray as online shopping pcks up speed: Internet Booms,” Comptuer Reseller News, Jun. 5, 1995.
Palm, Inc., PalmTM Web Pro Handbook, copyright 2002-2003.
Post et al., “Application of Auctions as a Pricing Mechanism for the Interchange of Electric Power,” IEEE Transactions of Power Systems, Aug. 1995, pp. 1580-1584, vol. 10, No. 3.
Preist et al., “Adaptive agents in a persistent shout double auction,” International Conference on Information and Computation, Proceedings of the first international conference on information and computation economies, Oct. 25-28, 1998, Charleston, United States, pp. 11-18.
Qualcomm, “Brew Developer Support,” printed from web.archive.org/web/20020209194207/http://www.qualcomm.com/brew/developer/support/kb/52.html on Aug. 30, 2007.
RCR Wireless News, “Lockheed Martin to use 2Roam's technology for wireless platform,” RCR Wireless News, Sep. 10, 2001.
Reck, “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System,” J. Systems Software, 1993, pp. 245-252, vol. 21.
Reck, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 17-23, vol. 7, No. 4.
repcheck.com, www.repcheck.com homepage, printed from web.archive.org/web/20020330183132/http://repcheck.com on Sep. 5, 2009.
Resnick et al., “Reputation Systems,” Communications of the ACM, Dec. 2000, pp. 45-48, vol. 43, No. 12.
Rockoff et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions,” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 1995, pp. 10-16, vol. 5, No. 4.
Rose, “Vendors strive to undo Adobe lock-hold,” Computer Reseller News, Feb. 5, 1996, n 66669, p. 71(7).
Rysavy, “Mobile-commerce ASPs do the legwork,” Network Computing, Jan. 22, 2001, p. 71, 6 pgs., vol. 12, No. 2.
Saunders, “AdFlight to Offer WAP Ads,” Oct. 17, 2000, printed from clickz.com/487531/print.
Schmid, “Electronic Markets,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Schwankert, “Matsushita Taps 2Roam for Wireless Solutions,” www.internetnews.com/bus-news.article.php/674811, Feb. 2, 2001.
Sen, “Inventory and Pricing Models for Perishable Products,” Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation—University of Southern California, Aug. 2000.
Siegmann, “Nowhere to go but up,” PC Week, Oct. 23, 1995, 3 pages, vol. 12, No. 42.
Telephony Staff, “Air-ASP,” Telephony Online, Oct. 2, 2000, 3 pages.
Teo, “Organizational Factors of Success in Using EDIS: A Survey of Tradenet Participants,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Tjostheim et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web,” printed from www.nr.no/gem/elcom/puplikasjoner/enter98e.html on Jun. 10, 1990, 10 pages.
Turban, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 5 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
ubid.com, “How do I Updated my Address, Phone, Credit Card, Password, etc.?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010208113903/www.ubid.com/help/topic13asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
ubid.com, “How do I track my shipment?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010331032659/www.ubid.com/help/topic27.asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
ubid.com, “Can I track all of my bids from My Page?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010208114049/www.ubid.com/help/topic14.asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
Van Heck et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 6 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
Verizon Wireless, “Verizon Wireless Customers Get It NowSM; Get Games, Get Pix, Get Ring Tones and Get Going in Full Color,” press release to PRNEWSWIRE, Sep. 23, 2002.
Warbelow et al., “AUCNET: TV Auction Network System,” Harvard Business School 9-190-001, Jul. 19, 1989, Rev. Apr. 12, 1996, pp. 1-15.
Weber, “How Financial Markets are Going On-line,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Wireless Internet, “DailyShopper Selects 2Roam to Enable Mobile Customers to Retrieve Nearby Sales and Promotions Information,” Wireless Internet, Apr. 2001.
Wireless Week, “Verizon Wireless Gets Going on BREW Agenda,” Wireless Week, Sep. 23, 2002.
xchanger.net, webpage printed from www.auctiva.com/showcases/as_4sale.asp?uid=exchanger, undated but at least as early as Oct. 12, 2000.
Yu et al., “Distributed Reputation Management for Electronic Commerce,” Computational Intelligence, 2002, pp. 535-549, vol. 18, No. 4.
Zetmeir, Auction Incentive Marketing, print of all pages of website found at home.earthlink.net/˜bidpointz/ made Oct. 8, 2004.
Zimmermann, “Integration of Financial Services: The TeleCounter,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Zwass, “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, pp. 3-23, vol. 1, No. 1.
2Roam, Inc., multiple archived pages of www.2roam.com retrieved via Internet Archive Wayback Machine on Jun. 10, 2008.
Alt et al., “Bibliography on Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 5 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Alt et al., “Computer Integrated Logistics,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 1, No. 3.
Anonymous, Image manipulation (image-editing software and image-manipulation systems)(Seybold Special Report, Part II), Seybold Report on Publishing Systems, May 15, 1995, p. S35(9), vol. 24, No. 18.
auctionwatch.com, multiple pages—including search results for “expedition,” printed Apr. 21, 2011.
auctiva.com, multiple pages, undated but website copyright date is “1999-2000.”
Ball et al., “Supply chain infrastructures: system integration and information sharing,” ACM SIGMOD Record, 2002, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 61-66.
Berger et al., “Random Ultiple-Access Communication and Group Testing,” IEEE, 1984.
Braganza, “IS Resarch at Cranfield—A Look at the Future,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Brecht et al., “The IM 2000 Research Programme,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Business Wire business/technology editors, “Sellers Flock to OutletZoo.com as New Automatic Price Drop Method Moves Excess Inventory Online,” Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Expands in Real Estate Market with Adoption of Rimfire on REALTOR.com,” Business Wire, Nov. 8, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Shows Strong Revenue Growth in Internet Imaging Business,” Business Wire, Nov. 10, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Partners with Pumatech to Delivery Wireless Alerts,” Business Wire, Dec. 18, 2000.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Takes eHow's How-to Solutions Wireless: With 2Roam, the Web's One-Stop Source for getting Things Done is on More Wireless Devices, with Ability to Purchase Its Products from Anywhere,” Business Wire, Oct. 2, 2000.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Drives Hertz to the Wireless Web: Number One Car Rental Company to Provide Customers Wireless Access from Any Device,” Business Wire, Aug. 7, 2001.
buy.com, www.buy.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004.
Chen et al., “Detecting Web Page Structure for Adaptive Viewing on Small Form Factor Devices,” ACM, May 20-24, 2003.
Clarke, “Research Programme in Supra-organizational Systems,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Clemons et al., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities markets,” Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information systems, New York, New York, United States, pp. 53-64, 1991.
friendster.com, homepage and “more info” pages, printed Apr. 29, 2004.
Google News archive search for “2Roam marketing” performed over the date range 2000-2003.
Google News archive search for “2Roam SMS” performed over the date range 2000-2008.
Grabowski et al., “Mobile-enabled grid middleware and/or grid gateways,” GridLab—A Grid Application Toolkit and Testbed, Work Package 12—Access for Mobile Users, Jun. 3, 2003.
Graham, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Jul. 1993, 4 pages, vol. 8, No. 2.
Gunthorpe et al., “Portfolio Composition and the Investment Horizon,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb. 1994, pp. 51-56.
Halperin, “Toward a Process Handbook for Organizational Coordination Processes,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Hess et al., “Computerized Loan Origination Systems: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, pp. 251-275.
IBM, “Anyonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1996, pp. 363-366, vol. 39, No. 3.
IBM, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jan. 1995, pp. 83-84, vol. 38, No. 1.
ICROSSING, “ICROSSING Search Synergy: Natural & Paid Search Symbiosis,” Mar. 2007.
IEEE 100—The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms, Seventh Edition, 2000. Entire book cited; table of contents, source list, and terms beginning with A included. ISBN 0-7381-2601-2.
Ives et al., “Editor's Comments—MISQ Central: Creating a New Intellectual Infrastructure,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, p. xxxv.
Joshi, “Information visibility and its effect on supply chain dynamics,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000 (fig. 4.5; p. 45).
Klein, “Information Logistics,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, pp. 11-12, vol. 3, No. 3.
Klein, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 4 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
Kubicek, “The Organization Gap,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Kuula, “Telematic Services in Finland,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lalonde, “The EDI World Institute: An International Approach,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lee et al., “Intelligent Electronic Trading for Commodity Exchanges,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lee et al., “Electronic Brokerage and Electronic Auction: The Impact of IT on Market Structures,” Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1996, pp. 397-406.
Lee, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions,” Electronic Market—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 24-28, vol. 7, No. 4.
LIVE365 press release, “Live365 to Offer Opt-In Advertising on Its Website,” Oct. 15, 2004.
London Business School, “Overture and Google: Internet Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising Options,” Mar. 2003.
M2 Presswire, “Palm, Inc.: Palm unveils new web browser optimised for handhelds; HTML browser offers high-speed web-browsing option,” Mar. 13, 2002.
Malone et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies,” Communications of the ACM, Jun. 1987, pp. 484-497, vol. 30, No. 6.
Mansell et al., “Electronic Trading Networks: The Route to Competitive Advantage?” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Mardesich, “Onsale takes auction gavel electronic,” Computer Reseller News, Jul. 8, 1996, pp. 2, 32.
Marteau, “Shop with One Click, Anywhere, Anytime,” Information Management and Consulting, 2000, pp. 44-46, vol. 15, No. 4.
Massimb et al., “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb. 1994, pp. 39-49.
Chen, M. (2007). Knowledge assisted data management and retrieval in multimedia database systems (Order No. 3268643).
Y.K. Choi and S. K. Kim, “An auxiliary reccomendation system for repetitively purchasing items in E-commerce,” 2014 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BIGCOMP), Bangkok, 2014, pp. 96-98. (Year 2014).
Fan, J., Keim, F.A., Gao, Y., Luo, H. and Li, Z. (2009). JustClick: Personalized Image Recommendation via Exploratory Search from Large-Scale Flickr Images. Feb. 2009. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 19(2), pp. 2730288. (Year: 2009).
S. Kulkarni, A. M. Sankpal, R.R. Mudholkar and Kirankumari, “Recommendation engine: Matching individual/group profiles for better shopping experience,” 2013 15th International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies (ICACT), Rajampet, 2013, pp. 1-6. (Year: 2013).
T.Y. Lee, S. Li and R. Wei, “Needs-Centric Searching and Ranking Based on Customer Reviews,” 2008 10th IEEE Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the Fifth IEEE Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services, Washington, DC, 2008, pp. 128-135. (Year: 2008).
Levy, Michael, and Dhruv Grewal. “Supply chain management in a networked economy.” Journal Retailing 76.4 (2000): 415-429.
Neisser, “Which is better for Social Media Monitoring: TweetDeck or SproutSocial” Mar. 17, 2011, Social Media Examiner, https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/which-is-better-for-social-media-monitoring-tweetdeck-or-sproutsocial/.
Rodriguez, Camille, HootSuite vs. social Oomph vs. Tweekdeck, Jan. 4, 2012, http://polkadotimpressions.com/2012/01/04/hootsuite-vs-social-oopmphvs.tweetdeck/ (Year: 2012).
Ross, David Frederick, Frederick S. Weston, and W. Stephen. Introduction to supply chain management technologies. CRC Press, 2010.
Schaffer, Neil, The Top 20 Twitter clients—HootSuite, TweetDeck and More, Jan. 31, 2012, https://maximizesocialbusinss.com/top-20-twitter-clients-2012-9175/ (Year: 2012).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61798813 Mar 2013 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14213741 Mar 2014 US
Child 14861796 US