The present application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 national phase conversion of PCT/EP2005/007850 filed Jul. 19, 2005, which claims priority of Austrian Application No. A1242/2004 filed Jul. 21, 2004, which are herein incorporated by reference. The PCT International Application was published in the English language.
The invention generally relates to femtosecond laser development, frequency metrology, and more in detail to carrier-envelope phase stabilization of femtosecond laser oscillator.
In particular, the invention concerns a method and a device for the generation of radiation with stabilized frequency, namely of a comb of stabilized frequency lines and/or of a train of ultrashort laser pulses with controlled temporal evolution of the carrier-envelope offset phase.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,724,788 B1 discloses a method and device for generating radiation with stabilized frequency, where laser light pulses with a repetition frequency fr are generated, said pulses comprising a plurality of n frequency components fn, with fn=n·fr+f0, wherein f0 represents an offset frequency, and n=1, . . . , N. Said frequency components form a comb with first and second different frequency portions. A primary light output is generated with a non-linear optical medium, where at least one output frequency component corresponds to the difference of frequencies of said first and second frequency portions. However, for phase matching, a separate, relatively complicated interferometer-type unit is used.
Dramatic advances in generating and controlling ultrashort-pulsed optical radiation took place during the last years. The quest for ever shorter laser pulses led to pulse durations as short as approximately twice the oscillation period of the carrier field (T0˜2.6 fs at λ0=0.8 μm, the center wavelength of a titanium-doped sapphire laser), approaching the limit set by the laser cycle, s. Ref. [1, 2, 3, 4]. This limit can be overcome by converting the optical pulses into higher-frequency radiation by means of high order harmonic generation (HHG). This process, if driven by few-cycle pulses, s. Ref. [5, 6], is capable of delivering x-ray pulses shorter than the oscillation period of the driving laser, s. Ref. [7] and even shorter than 1 fs in duration, s. Ref. [8]. The parameters of the attosecond pulses emerging from this process sensitively depend on how the oscillations of the electric field E(t)=A(t)exp [−i(ω0t+Φ)]+c.c. fit within the amplitude envelope, s. Ref. [9, 10, 11, 12]. This is determined by the phase angle Φ, which has been referred to as carrier-envelope offset (CEO) phase of light pulses, s. Ref. [13].
Thus, it is an object of the present invention to provide measurement and stabilization of this carrier-envelope offset. Stabilization of the CEO phase is of vital importance not only to strong-field experiments with few-cycle pulses (e.g. HHG) but also to frequency-domain metrology, s. Ref. [14].
Since few-cycle pulses are typically generated from mode-locked laser resonators, the light pulses are emitted as a periodic pulse train with a pulse to pulse delay time T, i.e. with a repetition frequency
The carrier-envelope phase Φ of consecutive pulses in such a train En=An(t)exp [−i (ω0t+Φn)]+c.c. (where ω0 is the carrier angular frequency, En the field strength of the n-th pulse and An the field envelope of the n-th pulse) emitted from a mode-locked laser is expected to change by Δ Φn=(Φn+1)−Φn=ΔΦ0+δn. The predictable part ΔΦ0 of this phase change originates from the difference between the effective group velocity vg and the phase velocity vp at the carrier frequency in the laser cavity and represents the mean value of ΔΦn averaged over many pulses, Δ Φ0=Δ Φn. The carrier-envelope phase-shift experienced by a pulse upon propagation through a transparent material of length L and refractive index n(ω) can be expressed as
where Ld is the propagation length over which Φ gets shifted by π, i.e.,
This dephasing length is Ld˜20 cm in air, and ˜19 μm in sapphire, respectively. Comparing these values with those of the propagation lengths in the respective media in a Ti:sapphire oscillator, it may be concluded that the carrier-envelope dephasing experienced by a laser pulse during a resonator round-trip amounts to a large integer multiple of 2π plus a rational fraction of 2π. This physically relevant part is denoted with ΔΦn, and is referred to as pulse-to-pulse or round-trip carrier-envelope offset phase shift. The length of the laser cavity can, in principle, be tuned so as the round-trip phase change would be equal to an integer multiple of 2π, and all the pulses in the emitted train would have a constant absolute phase, affected only by small random changes δn. However, even small values of δn rapidly accumulate to a large (>>2π) jitter of Φ in very short intervals of time, since the repetition frequency is very high (typically tens of MHz). It is thus imperative to measure and stabilize Φn, i.e. to measure and stabilize the temporal evolution of the CEO phase.
The spectrum of a train of mode-locked pulses consists of spectral lines fn separated by the repetition frequency fr, such that fn+1−fn=fr (see also
The repetition frequency fr can be directly accessed by measuring the laser output with a photodiode and filtering its signal with a low-pass filter suppressing frequencies above fr. As the CEO frequency fCEO does not represent a directly measurable frequency, but a frequency-shift, its determination is not trivial. Access to the CEO frequency FCEO can be gained by heterodyning modes obtained from the laser comb via nonlinear frequency conversion processes of different order. A frequency closed to a given mode fk=kfr can be generated either from the mode fn via a qth-order nonlinear process, or from the mode fm via a pth-order non-linear process (k, m and n are large integers, such that nq=mp):
fqn=qfn=qnfr+qfCEO (2)
fpm=pfm=pmfr+pfCEO (3)
Heterodyning fqn with fpm will give rise to a beat note at:
Δf=qnfr+qfCEO−pmfr−pfCEO=(q−p)fCEO (4)
If the frequency comb is narrow, the realization of two different nonlinear frequency conversion paths leading to the same spectral line might call for the use of one or more additional phase-locked transfer oscillators, s. Ref. [15]. However, the advent of photonic crystal fibers (PCFs) allows extra-cavity broadening to more than one optical octave, s. Ref. [16, 14], just as specially-designed oscillators with more than 1 MW peak power did in conjunction with standard single-mode fibers, s. Ref. [17]. These advances opened the way towards the simplest possible implementation of the above concept, namely with p=1 and q=2 in the above terminology. Measuring the CEO frequency fCEO in this case relies on the heterodyne detection of the short-wavelength modes of the comb with the frequency-doubled long-wavelength modes, which can be accomplished if the frequency comb spans a full optical octave. This method has been referred to as the “f to 2f” technique. The CEO-measured CEO frequency fCEO may be compared to a stabilized radiofrequency and locked to it by means of a feedback loop that controls the round-trip CEO phase via the resonator dispersion or via the intra-cavity energy.
The technical drawbacks of the f to 2f stabilization technique are its cumbersome complexity and the invasive nature of the stabilization. So far, the pulses passing through the phase-stabilizing device could neither be recompressed nor used for applications. As a consequence, the time evolution of the CEO phase was measured and stabilized not directly at the useful output of the system. Due to this reason, large phase error always appears around 1-10 ms observation time, s. Ref. [18].
Once the CEO frequency fCEO is locked to a reference frequency, the frequency comb corresponding to the train of laser pulses consists of precisely fixed frequency lines with an accurately known and well-controllable spacing. This fixed frequency comb is a valuable tool for frequency-domain metrology. Alternatively to the f to 2f technique, as in the U.S. Pat. No. 6,724,788 B1, it is proposed to generate such a comb of fixed frequencies by performing difference frequency generation between different frequency lines of the laser spectrum. For two frequency components fn=n·fr+fCEO (or fk=k·fr+f0) and fm=m·fr+fCEO, (or fl=l·fr+f0) the resulting difference frequency fm−fn=(m−n)·fr (or fk−fl=(k−l)·fr) does not depend on fCEO and is thus inherently stabilized (m, n or k, l, respectively, being integers). Stabilization of the CEO phase evolution of the laser pulse train would require detecting a beating signal between the fundamental spectrum and the spectrum resulting from difference-frequency generation between the spectral wings, s. Ref. [19, 20]. This can only be achieved with a spectrum extending over more than one optical octave. Since such spectra can not be easily generated directly from a femtosecond laser oscillator, in the above mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,724,788 B1 it is proposed to broaden the spectrum in a non-linear element before generating the difference frequency signal. This solution comes along with the drawbacks that characterize f to 2f measurements: the pulses after the non-linear optical medium are incompressible and the full energy of the broadened pulses is required for the measurement of the CEO frequency fCEO.
In contrast to this solution, it is now proposed according to the present invention to realize the process of spectral broadening (by means of self phase modulation) and the process of difference frequency generation in the same, comparatively short non-linear optical medium. Given the moderated length of the medium, its group delay dispersion can be compensated. The beating signal at fCEO is detected in a spectral range well separated from the spectrum of the incident pulses. This spectral range can easily be separated from the spectrum of the pulse train that can further be employed for experiments.
It should be mentioned here that it has been previously proposed to detect a beating signal at fCEO by performing second harmonic generation (in contrast to difference frequency generation, as proposed here) and spectral broadening in one and the same non-linear medium, s. Ref. [21]. The choice of difference frequency generation as the non-linear conversion process in the scheme according to the invention is essential, since employing second harmonic generation has the following drawbacks (as shown by Ref. [21]): i) the full broadened output is required for the measurement of fCEO, ii) although fCEO is detectable, the beating signal at this frequency is too weak to be stabilized.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a method and a device for generating radiation with stabilized frequency, in particular for generating a comb of stabilized frequency lines and/or a train of ultrashort laser pulses with controlled temporal evolution of the CEO phase, where the drawbacks of the prior art are avoided, and where the intended radiation generation with stabilized frequencies is accomplished in a simple, yet efficient manner.
Further, it is an object of the invention to provide a radiation generation technique where a compression of laser pulses, after having passed the non-linear optical medium, and having been broadened thereby, is rendered possible in an efficient way.
Moreover, as mentioned above, it is an object of the invention to provide a radiation generation techniques where measurement and stabilization of the carrier envelope offset (CEO) is possible.
According to the invention, these objects and further goals are achieved by the subject matter as defined in the attached independent claims. Advantageous, preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
According to the invention, a very simple, efficient and particularly accurate stabilization is achieved, and only very small insertion losses are caused, as compared with the prior art techniques; further effects and advantages issue from the above and the following explanations.
The invention will now be described in more detail by way of examples and with reference to the enclosed drawings. In the drawings
As mentioned above,
The non-linear optical medium 4 may comprise a periodically poled magnesium oxide-doped lithium niobate (PP—MgO:LN) crystal, as is indicated in
The output of the non-linear medium 4, or crystal 4, respectively, is coupled into a delay line 8 comprising chirped mirrors CM3, CM4 (with multiple reflections) via a concave mirror 9. At the output 8′ of the delay line, e.g. 6-fs phase-stabilized pulses are obtained, i.e. a train of laser light pulses, the laser light having a spectrum spanning the wavelength range of 0.6-1.2 μm.
Furthermore, the output light of the non-linear crystal 4 is sent to a detector and stabilizing unit 10 comprising a detector 11 which includes a long pass filter LF having a cutoff wavelength at 1400 nm and a photo diode PD, for instance an In—GaAs photo diode. For stabilizing the frequency, a feedback loop 12 is provided comprising a low-pass amplifier 13, e.g. an electronic amplifier available from Stanford Research System (Model SR560); a phase-locking electronics 14, as e.g. the “lock box” from MenloSystems; and a rf (radio frequency) reference oscillator 15, for instance a signal generator, Marconi, 2022D, which is operated at 1 Mhz.
From
The device according to
The underlying processes of this scheme are explained in
In an experiment, the pulses passing through the non-linear crystal 4 were re-compressed by the delay line 8 down to 6 fs, which is few-cycle pulse, and the measured out of loop phase noise was 0.0427π rad (from 10 μs to 35 minutes observation time), which is approximately five times better than that of the prior art phase stabilization methods, s. Ref. [18, 22]. The large phase error step-like structure around the observation time corresponding to about 200 Hz (indicated by 16 in
[1] A. Baltuska, Z. Wei, M. S. Pshenichnikov, and D. A. Wiersma. Optical pulse compression to 5 fs at 1-MHz repetition rate. Opt. Lett., 22:102-104, 1997.
[2] Z. Cheng, A. Fiirbach, S. Sartania, M. Lenzner, Ch. Spielmann, and F. Krausz. Amplitude and chirpcharacterization of high-power laser pulses in the 5-fs regime. Opt. Lett., 24:247-249, 1999.
[3] U. Morgner, F. X. Kartner, S. H. Cho, Y. Chen, H. A. Haus, J. G. Fujimoto, E. P. Ippen, V. Scheuer, G. Angelow, and T. Tschudi. Sub-two-cycle pulses from a Kerr-lens mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser. Opt. Lett., 24:411-413, 1999.
[4] D. H. Sutter, G. Steinmeyer, L. Gallmann, N. Matuschek, F. Morier-Genoud, U. Keller, V. Scheuer, G. Angelow, and T. Tschudi. Semiconductor saturable-absorber mirror-assisted Kerr-lens mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser producing pulses in the two-cycle regime. Opt. Lett., 24:631-633, 1999.
[5] Ch. Spielmann, N. H. Burnett, S. Sartania, R. Koppitsch, M. Schniirer, C. Kan, M. Lenzner, P. Wobrauschek, and F. Krausz. Generation of coherent x-rays in the water window using 5-femto-second laser pulses. Science, 278:661-664, 1997.
[6] M. Schniirer, Ch. Spielmann, P. Wobrauschek, C. Streli, N. H. Burnett, C. Kan, K. Ferencz, R. Koppitsch, Z. Cheng, T. Brabec, and F. Krausz. Coherent 0.5-kev x-ray emission from helium driven by a sub-10-fs laser. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:3236-3239, 1998.
[7] M. Drescher, M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, G. Tempea, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, P. B. Corkum, and F. Krausz. X-ray pulses approaching the attosecond frontier. Science, 291:1923-1927, 2001.
[8] R. Kienberger, M. Hentschel, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, N. Milosevic, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz. Sub-femto-second x-ray pulse generation and measurement. Appl. Phys. B, 74:S3-S9, 2002.
[9] A. de Bohan, P. Antoine, D. B. Milosevic, and B. Piraux. Phase-dependent harmonic emission with ultrashort laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:1837-1840, 1998.
[10] G. Tempea, M. Geissler, and T. Brabec. Phase sensitivity of high-order harmonic generation with few-cycle laser pulses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 16:669-673, 1999.
[11] A. Baltuska, Th. Udem, M. Uiberacker, M. Hentschel, E. Goulielmakis, Ch. Gohle, R. Holzwarth, V. S. Yakovlev, A. Scrinzi, T. W. Hansch, and F. Krausz. Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields. Nature, 421:611-615, 2003.
[12] M. Nisoli, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, S. De Silvestri, C. Vozzi, M. Pascolini, L. Poletto, P. Villoresi, and G. Tondello. Effects of carrier-envelope phase differences of few-optical-cycle light pulses in single-shot high-order-harmonic spectra. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:213905, 2003.
[13] L. Xu, C. Spielmann, A. Poppe, T. Brabec, and F. Krausz. Route to phase control of ultrashort light pulses. Opt. Lett., 21:2008-2010, 1996.
[14] R. Holzwarth, Th. Udem, T. W. Hansch, J. C. Knight, W. J. Wadsworth, and P. St. J. Russel. Optical frequency synthesizer for precision spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:2264-2267, 2000.
[15] H. R. Telle, G. Steinmeyer, A. E. Dunlop, J. Stenger, D. H. Sutter, and U. Keller. Carrier-envelope offset phase control: A novel concept for absolute optical frequency measurement and ultrashort pulse generation. Appl. Phys. B, 69:327-332, 1999.
[16] D. J. Jones, S. A. Diddams, J. K. Ranka, A. Stentz, R. S. Windeler, J. L. Hall, and S. T. Cundiff. Carrier-envelope phase control of femtosecond mode-locked lasers and direct optical frequency synthesis. Science, 288:635-639, 2000.
[17] A. Apolonski, A. Poppe, G. Tempea, Ch. Spielmann, Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hansch, and F. Krausz. Controlling the phase evolution of few-cycle light pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:740-743, 2000.
[18] T. M. Fortier, D. J. Jones, J. Ye, and S. T. Cundiff. Long-term carrier-envelope phase coherence. Opt. Lett., 27:1436-1438, 2002.
[19] M. Zimmermann, C. Gohle, R. Holzwarth, T. Udem, and T. W. Hansch. Optical clockwork with an offset-free difference-frequency comb: accuracy of sum- and difference-frequency generation. Opt. Lett., 29:310-312, 2004.
[20] T. Fuji, A. Apolonski, and F. Krausz. Self-stabilization of carrier-envelope offset phase by use of difference-frequency generation. Opt. Lett., 29:632-634, 2004.
[21] O. D. Miicke, T. Tritschler, M. Wegener, U. Morgner, and F. X. Kartner. Determining the carrier-envelope offset frequency of 5-fs pulses with extreme nonlinear optics in zno. Opt. Lett., 27:2127-2129, 2002.
[22] P. Dombi, A. Apolonski, Ch. Lemell, G. G. Paulus, M. Kakehata, R. Holzwarth, Th. Udem, K. Torizuka, J. Burgdorfer, T. W. Hansch, and F. Krausz. Direct measurement and analysis of the carrier-envelope phase in light pulses approaching the single-cycle regime. New Journal of Physics, 6:39, 2004.
[23] J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, P. S. Pershan, Interactions between Light Waves in a Nonlinear Dielectric. Pyhs. Rev. 127(6): 1918-1939, 1962.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1242/2004 | Jul 2004 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/007850 | 7/19/2005 | WO | 00 | 1/18/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/008135 | 1/26/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6034976 | Mossberg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6724788 | Holzwarth et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080049301 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |