The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Reference now will be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific-details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
Some portions of the detailed descriptions which follow are presented in terms of particles and quasi-particles interactions, procedures, equations, blocks, diagrams, and other symbolic representations of physical processes. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the art of physics of condensed matter to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art.
The electrons in a ferromagnetic semiconductor can be divided into two groups: free electrons, which determine the electrical conductivity of the semiconductor, and electrons localized at the ions (d- or f-electrons), which determine its magnetic properties.
The main interaction between these two groups of electrons is the exchange interaction, which lift the spin degeneracy of the electrons. The conduction (valence band) splits into two subbands with spin up (along the magnetization) and spin down, with an exchange gap Δ=2I<Sz>, where I is the exchange energy of the conduction electrons and the localized spins, and <Sz> is the mean value of the localized spins. At temperatures much lower than the Curie temperature, Tc, the mean value of the localized spins <Sz> is temperature independent: <Sz>=S.
The exchange gap Δ is usually larger than 0.1 eV. For example, for EuO the exchange gap is: Δ=0.6 eV. For the reference, please see: J. Lascaray, J. P. Desfours, and M. Averous, Sol. St. Corn. 19, 677 (1976).
If the exchange energy is positive, I>0, then the bottom of the subband with spin up 12 is located below the bottom of the subband with spin down 14 (
A nonequilibrium electron 20 put in the upper subband with spin down rapidly emits a magnon 18, with a large wave vector q≈−1 (2 mΔ)1/2, where m is the electron effective mass. It follows from the energy and momentum conservation laws that if the energy of this electron, εp, measured from the bottom of the spin down subband is much smaller than Δ, the wave vector of the emitted magnon, q lies in the interval q1≦q≦q2, where q1,2=−1 (p0±p), p0=(2 m Δ)1/2, p=(2 m εp)1/2<<p0. The frequency of these magnons may be in the Terahertz region.
For EuO, the values of electron mass m are inconsistent according to different references. According to one reference, (J. Shoenes and P. Wachter, Phys. Rev. B 9, 3097 (1974)), m=0.35 m0, m0 is the free electron mass, and the wave vector of the exited magnons q≈q0=−1 p0=2.6 107 cm−1. The spin-wave stiffness D=10.8 10−16 mev·cm2. (Please, see L. Passel, O. W. Dietrich and J. Als-Nielsen, Phys. Rev. B 9, 3097, 1974). This gives the energy of the exited magnons ω=Dq2=0.73 meV, and the frequency fm=ω/2π=0.19 THz. Merging of two magnons with frequency f and wave vectors {right arrow over (q)} and (−){right arrow over (q)} generates a photon with frequency 2f (for the reference, please see M. I. Kaganov and V. M. Tsukernik, Sov. Phys. -JETP 37, 587 (1960)). Thus, in the above given example, the frequency of the emitted radiation is: fr=2fm=0.38 THz.
On the other hand, according to another reference (I. Ya. Korenblit, A. A. Samokhvalov and V. V. Osipov, in Sov. Sc. Rev. A, Physics, 8, 447. Harwood Ac. Publ., UK, 1987), the electron mass value in EuO is quite different: m=1.5 m0. If this is the case, one obtains a quite different value for the radiation frequency: fr=1.6 THz.
More generally, consider a ferromagnetic semiconductor with Δ≈0.2 eV, and m=0.3 m0. Then we have q0=1.4 107 cm−1. The magnon frequency ω(q0)≈kTc (q0a)2, where k is the Boltzman constant, and α is the lattice constant. With Tc≈100-300 K and α≈3-5×10−8 cm, the magnon frequency is fm≈1.6 THz, and the radiation frequency fr≈2.0 THz.
The ratio of the magnon generation rate, Γe({right arrow over (q)}), to the rate of Γm({right arrow over (q)}), their relaxation (in collisions with equilibrium magnons) is a function of the wave vector {right arrow over (q)}. Therefore the nonequilibrium magnon distribution function, N({right arrow over (q)}) has a maximum at some wave vector {right arrow over (q)}={right arrow over (q)}*. N({right arrow over (q)}) increases with the increase of the electron pumping, and because of the simulated emission of magnons, the function N({right arrow over (q)}) grows most rapidly at {right arrow over (q)} close to {right arrow over (q)}*. When the pump reaches some critical value, N({right arrow over (q)}*) starts to increase very fast with the increase of the electron pumping. At some conditions the generation of magnons with {right arrow over (q)}={right arrow over (q)}* becomes avalanche-like, and the magnon system becomes unstable. For more details, please see references: I. Ya. Korenblit and B. G. Tankhilevich, Sov. Phys. -JETP, 46, 1167 (1977); I. Ya. Korenblit and B. G. Tankhilevich, Sov. Phys. -JETP Lett. 24, 555 (1976); I. Ya. Korenblit and B. G. Tankhilevich, Phys. Lett. A 64, 307 (1977), and equations below. As a result an intense Terahertz radiation can be obtained.
The system of equations which govern the behavior of the electron, f↓({right arrow over (p)}), and magnon, N({right arrow over (q)}) distribution functions were obtained in the following paper: I. Ya. Korenblit and B. G. Tankhilevich, Sov. Phys. -JETP, 46, 1167 (1977). They read
[1+N({right arrow over (q)})]Γe({right arrow over (q)})]−[N({right arrow over (q)})−N(0)({right arrow over (q)})]Γm({right arrow over (q)})=0
f
↓({right arrow over (p)})γem({right arrow over (p)})=g(εp). (Eqs. 1)
Γe({right arrow over (q)})=4π−1I2Sv0∫d3p(2π)−3δ(γ↑({right arrow over (p)}−{right arrow over (q)})|ε{right arrow over (p)}↓−ω{right arrow over (q)}−ε{right arrow over (p)}−{right arrow over (q)},↑)f↓({right arrow over (p)}), (Eq. 2)
where v0 is the unit cell volume.
γem is the electron-magnon relaxation rate:
γem({right arrow over (p)})=4π−1I2Sv0∫d3q(2π)−3δ(γ↑({right arrow over (p)}−{right arrow over (q)})|ε{right arrow over (p)}↓−ω{right arrow over (q)}−ε{right arrow over (p)}−{right arrow over (q)},↑)(1+N({right arrow over (q)})), (Eq. 3)
The “smeared” δ-function, δ(γ|ε), takes into account the finite lifetime of the electrons in the final state, caused by the interaction with optical phonons, which may be strong in ferromagnetic semiconductors, with an essential ionicity contribution to the chemical bonds. We have
The rate γ↑(p, εp) is the known electron damping rate due to the emission of longitudinal optical phonons (22 of
γ1(εp)=(π/2)αΩ(Ω/Δ)1/2ln(4Δ/Ω)<<Δ. (Eq. 5)
The function g(ε) is the generation function of electrons, with spin down. We shall treat it as a δ-function
g(εp)=g0εδ(ε−εp). (Eq. 6)
The second term in the l.h.s. in the first of Eqs. (1) describes the relaxation of non-equilibrium magnons in collisions with equilibrium ones, under the assumption that N({right arrow over (q)}), is close to its equilibrium value,
N
(0)({right arrow over (q)})=[e(ω
Γm({right arrow over (q)}) is the magnon-magnon relaxation rate. From Eqs. (1) we obtain the following integral equation for N({right arrow over (q)}),
N({right arrow over (q)})=(N0({right arrow over (q)})+Γe({right arrow over (q)})/Γm({right arrow over (q)}))(1−Γe({right arrow over (q)})/Γm({right arrow over (q)}))−1, (Eq. 8)
where
Γe({right arrow over (q)})=g0ε∫d3pδ(γ↑(γ↑({right arrow over (p)}−{right arrow over (q)})|ε{right arrow over (p)}↓−ω{right arrow over (q)}−ε{right arrow over (p)}−{right arrow over (q)},↑)δ(ε−εp)Z−1({right arrow over (p)}), (Eq. 9)
and
Z({right arrow over (p)})=∫d3qδ(γ↑({right arrow over (p)}−{right arrow over (q)})|ε{right arrow over (p)}↓−ω{right arrow over (q)}−ε{right arrow over (p)}−{right arrow over (q)},↑)(1+N({right arrow over (q)})). (Eq. 10)
Eq. (8) is formally reminiscent of the expression for the magnon distribution function under conditions of parametric pumping. The difference is that here the rate Γe is itself a functional of N({right arrow over (q)}), since the number of the emitted magnons depends on the distribution function of the electrons with spin down, f↓, which according to Eqs. (2) and (3) is in its turn determined not only by the pump g(εp) but also by a certain average (10) over the magnon distribution function. The behavior of N({right arrow over (q)}) is therefore different from that in the case of parametric pumping.
Let us assume for simplicity that the magnon and electron spectra are isotropic. Then Fe(q) and Fm(q) do not depend on the direction of {right arrow over (q)}.
The relaxation rate Γ(q) is usually a power function of q, and it can be written as
Γm(q)=Γm(p0)(q/p0)t. (Eq. 11)
More specifically, if Γm(q) is determined by magnon-magnon exchange scattering, then t=4 for magnons, with energy ω(q0) larger than kT, and t=3 for magnons, with energy ω(q0) smaller than kT.
The strong pumping regime sets in, when g0 exceeds a critical value Gc. If the damping of electrons by optical phonons is less than (ΓΔ)1/2, this critical value is given by
G
c=2gc/(t+1),
g
c=(Δ/ε)3/2Γm(q0)[1+N(0)(q0)]. (Eqs. 12)
N(q)=[1+N(0)(q0)](p0/2pε(t+1))exp(g0/Gc), (Eq. 13)
if q falls into the smooth region
p
0
−p
ε≦q≦p0−pε+δq,
δq=2pεexp(−g0/Gc), (Eqs. 14)
while N(q) with wave vectors outside of the above-given range does not depend on the pump.
Thus, under sufficiently strong pumping the magnon distribution function has a sharp peak at q≈p0−pε.
Let us define the number of electrons, ε, pumped per second per unit cell as:
ε=v0(2π)−3∫d3pg(εp). (Eq. 15)
β=(v0ε3/2m3/2g0/21/2π23) (Eq. 16)
and the critical pumping βc, with g0=Gc is
βc=(v0q30/(2(t+1)π2))Γm(q0)[1+N(0)(q0)]. (Eq. 17)
Since we are interested in high-frequency magnons, we suppose that their relaxation is mainly due to four-magnon exchange interaction. Using the expressions for Γm given in the following reference (V. G. Vaks, A. I. Larkin and S. A. Pikin, JETP 53 (1967)), we estimated for T/Tc≈0.2, and ω(q0)>kT, N(0)(q0)<<1: Γm≈108-109 sec−1.
Thus, it follows from Eq. (17) the estimate βc≈105-107 sec−1, and we took into account that N(0)(q0) is small.
To get a sense of these estimates, we consider a model, in which the spin-down electrons are emitted into their active region across the surface area 1 cm2. The lattice constant α of EuO is approximately 5×10−8 cm, i.e. the unit cell volume is approximately v0≈10−22 cm3. The critical value Ne≈βc×v0≈1028-1029 cm−3 sec−1. This is the number of electrons, which should cross the edge in one second to achieve the critical number of emitted magnons in a volume of 1 cm3. However, electrons will emit magnons at a short distance from the edge, which can be estimated in the following way.
The electron-magnon frequency γem is of order 3×1012-1013 sec−1. The velocity of electrons with energy of order of 10−2Δ is 5×106-107 cm×sec−1. This gives the mean free path of electrons with respect to magnon emission as: l≈10−6 cm. Thus, all electrons entering a sample (including a magnon gain medium) across a selected side will emit magnons at this distance from that side. Therefore, only the region of width l is active, and we get for the current density j=Ne×1 electrons/sec×cm2. The charge of an electron is 1.6×10−19 Q. Taking into account that 1×Q/sec=1 A, we finally get: j=104-105 A/cm2. Current densities of order 105-106 A/cm2 are easy to achieve in semiconductors. In a pulse regime one can obtain current densities j as high as: j=109 A/cm.
The physical meaning of the critical pumping Gc can be understood as follows. The ratio Γe/Γm of the rate of generation of the magnons to the rate of their relaxation reaches its maximum value at q=p0−pε and has its minimum at q=p0+pε, i.e. there is an excess generation on the left end of the interval in comparison with the right end. Stimulated emission causes the increase of this asymmetry. Nonlinear generation begins when the difference between the number of non-equilibrium magnons at the ends of the generation interval becomes equal to the number of equilibrium magnons, if N(0)>1. On the other hand, nonlinear generation begins when the difference between the number of non-equilibrium magnons at the ends of the generation interval becomes equal to 1, if the opposite inequality (N(0)<1) holds.
If the electron damping due to optical phonon scattering is large, γ↑>>(εΔ)1/2, the critical pumping, G′c is smaller than gc given by Eq. (12).
G′
c
=πg
cγ↑/Δ. (Eq. 18)
N(q)=[1+N(0)(q)](q0/G′c)2. (Eq. 19)
One should stress that only the main generation regimes are taken into account herein. More details can be found in the following reference: I. Ya. Korenblit and B. G. Tankhilevich, Sov. Phys. -JETP, 46, 1167 (1977).
B. Effect of Anisotropy. Instability of the Magnon System.
If the ratio of the generation rate Γe({right arrow over (q)}) to the relaxation rate Γm({right arrow over (q)}) depends on the direction of the wave vector {right arrow over (q)}, then in the nonlinear regime the stimulated emission of magnons results in the strong anisotropy of magnon distribution function. As an example, one can consider the anisotropy of Γe ({right arrow over (q)})/Γm({right arrow over (q)}) caused by the anisotropy of the magnon spectrum. The spectrum of magnons with q close to p0/ can be written as
ωq=Dq2(1+Λ sin2 θ), (Eq. 20)
where
Λ=2gμBMs/ωp0<<1, (Eq. 21)
Ms is the magnetization, θ{right arrow over (q)} is the angle between the vectors {right arrow over (q)} and {right arrow over (M)}s. If the inequality ω(q0)<kT holds, then the anisotropy of Γe({right arrow over (q)})/Γm({right arrow over (q)}) implies that the generation is the largest at some angle θ.
Consider the situation, when the damping is large, i.e. γ↑>>(εΔ)1/2. Since the anisotropy is small (Λ<<1), the anisotropy becomes effective only at sufficiently strong pumping, larger than the critical one, Eq. (18). At g=Gc given by this equation, the number of magnons starts to increase as in the isotropic case. If one assumes that the basic equations (Eqs. 1), describing the generation of magnons close to equilibrium, are valid also beyond the critical pumping, one can reveal the role of small anisotropy.
As shown in the following reference: I. Ya. Korenblit and B. G. Tankhilevich, Sov. Phys. -JETP, 46, 1167 (1977), the maximum generation takes place for magnons with θ close to zero and q close to p0. If the pumping reaches the critical value g*
g*=π
2
γ↑gc/2Λ1/2Δ, (Eq. 22)
the function N({right arrow over (q)}) becomes
where εq=2q2/2 m.
We get at q=p0, i.e. at εq=Δ
N({right arrow over (q)})=N(0)({right arrow over (q)})/Λ sin2 (θ{right arrow over (q)}) (Eq. 24)
At θ=0 the denominator of this expression goes to zero. The steady solution of Eqs. (1) exists only at pumping levels below g*. When the pumping level reaches the critical value g*, an avalanche-type growth of the number of magnons occurs, whereas the wave vectors of these non-equilibrium anisotropic magnons are directed along the magnetization and are equal to p0.
Note, that at sufficiently low temperatures the three-magnon dipole scattering may be more important then the discussed above four-magnon exchange scattering. However, the three-magnon scattering probability, as opposed to the four-magnon exchange scattering probability, is a highly anisotropic one and is proportional to sin2 θ cos2 θ. If this is the case, one should expect an instability of magnons with θ=0 and θ=π/2.
The interaction of magnons with electromagnetic radiation was considered in the following reference: M. I. Kaganov and V. M. Tsukernik, Sov. Phys. -JETP 37, 587 (1960). Merging of two magnons with wave vectors q and q′ generates a photon with wave vector
{right arrow over (k)}={right arrow over (q)}+{right arrow over (q)}′ (Eq. 25)
and with frequency vk equal to
ωq+ωq′=vk=ck, (Eq. 26)
where c is the light velocity.
It follows from these conservation laws that k is much smaller than q, i.e. {right arrow over (q)}=−{right arrow over (q)}′.
Using the results of the same reference: M. I. Kaganov and V. M. Tsukernik, Sov. Phys. -JETP 37, 587 (1960), one can derive the rate of the change of the photon distribution function, n(v) in the following way:
where μ is the Bohr magneton. The last term in the (Eq. 27) describes the relaxation of generated photons, and τph is the photon relaxation time.
For EuO, with q0=2.6×10 cm−1, v=1.5 meV, and 4πMs=24×103 Gs, one obtains W≈2×107 sec−1.
If the magnon distribution function is isotropic, one can perform the integration in Eq. (27) and one gets the following equation:
By analyzing this equation, it is clear that at the initial stage of generation, when n is smaller than N, the number of photons increases as N2, provided the photon relaxation is sufficiently small. With the increase of n, the negative terms in Eq. (29) become significant, and the photons reach a steady state, with dn/dt=0. If this is the case, we have the following expression for the number of photons n at the steady state:
where w=16W/15.
If wτph is large, wτph>>1/N, the number of photons is as follows:
If, on the other hand, 1/N2<<wτph<<1/N, the number of photons is as follows:
n=wτ
ph
N
2,1<<n<<N. Eq. (32)
n≈n(0). Eq. (33)
The magnon gain medium of the present invention can be implemented by selecting any material that supports generation of substantial number of nonequilibrium magnons that by merging into photons generate THz photons. For example, ferromagnetic semiconductors (europium chalcogenides and chalcogenide spinels), and/or ferromagnetic isolators, can be used to implement the magnon gain medium of the present invention.
Any method that can generate substantial number of nonequilibrium electrons that could rapidly emit nonequilibrium magnons could be used for the purposes for the present invention. For example, laser pumping of polarized electrons, injection of polarized electrons, etc. In addition, injection of non-polarized electrons can be also used for the purposes for the present invention.
In one embodiment of the present invention,
In one embodiment of the present invention, the optical resonator 74-76 comprises polished surfaces of magnon gain medium 76 and 74, or additional mirrors (not shown) configured to contain THz photons up to the threshold density of THz photons. At the threshold density, the THz photons are released from the magnon gain medium 64 into the THz waveguide 78.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the THz photons released from the magnon gain medium 64 into the THz waveguide 78 can be accumulated in the optical cavity 82.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the optical cavity comprises an optical resonator. In one embodiment of the present invention, the optical resonator comprises a Fabry-Perot cavity, a distributed feedback (DFB) cavity, or a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR).
In one embodiment of the present invention, the magnon gain medium 64 is placed in a thermostat 80 that keeps the operational temperature T below the critical temperature Tc. For instance, for EuO, the thermostat 80 keeps the EuO sample at temperature T below its Curie temperature: T<Tc=70K.
In one embodiment, the steps of the method of the present invention for THz photon generation can be performed by using the above-disclosed apparatus 60 (of
In one embodiment, the method of the present invention for photon generation comprises the following steps (not shown): (A) providing a magnon gain medium; wherein the magnon gain medium supports generation of nonequilibrium magnons; and (B) generating the nonequilibrium magnons in the magnon gain medium; wherein interaction between the nonequilibrium magnons causes generation of photons.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (A) further comprises: (A1) placing the magnon gain medium 64 in the thermostat 80 to maintain temperature of the magnon gain medium below a critical temperature. This step is herein illustrated by using the apparatus 60 (of
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (A) further comprises: (A2) selecting the magnon gain medium from the group consisting of: {ferromagnetic semiconductor; ferromagnetic isolator; and ferromagnetic material}.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (A2) further comprises: (A2, 1) placing the magnon gain medium comprising the selected ferromagnetic material in the thermostat to maintain temperature of the selected ferromagnetic material below its Curie temperature.
Indeed, in general, to achieve the generation of photons, it is sufficient to generate nonequilibrium magnons in a magnon gain medium, and to merge the generated nonequilibrium magnons.
More specifically, in one embodiment of the present invention, the step (B) of generating the nonequilibrium magnons in the magnon gain medium comprises: (B1) injecting nonequilibrium electrons into the magnon gain medium; wherein propagation of the nonequilibrium electrons in the magnon gain medium causes generation of the nonequilibrium magnons. Please, see the given above detailed equations Eqs. (1-24) that describe how the propagation of the nonequilibrium electrons in the magnon gain medium causes generation of nonequilibrium magnons.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (B1) further comprises pumping nonequilibrium electrons by using the source of electrons 62 (of
In another embodiment of the present invention, the step (B1) further comprises pumping substantially sufficient number of polarized nonequilibrium electrons into the magnon gain medium to cause generation of the nonequilibrium magnons in the magnon gain medium. In one more embodiment of the present invention, the step (B1) further comprises pumping a threshold number of polarized nonequilibrium electrons into the magnon gain medium, wherein the threshold number of pumped polarized nonequilibrium electrons is substantially sufficient to generate a magnon avalanche effect in the magnon gain medium. Please see Eqs. (12-14).
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (B1) further comprises changing a maximum frequency of the generated photons by changing critical temperature of the magnon gain medium; wherein the critical temperature of the magnon gain medium depends on an external parameter; and wherein the external parameter is selected from the group consisting of: {an external pressure; and a concentration of impurities in the magnon gain medium}.
Indeed, for instance, the Curie temperature of EuO can be changed by applying an external pressure, and/or by doping EuO with certain impurities. Please, see M. W. Shafer and T. R. McGuire, J. Appl. Phys., 39, 588 (1968).
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (B1) further comprises changing a n operating frequency of the generated photons; wherein the operating frequency of the generated photons depends on an external parameter; and wherein the external parameter is selected from the group consisting of: {energy of the injected electrons; and an operating temperature of the thermostat}.
From the given above equations Eqs. (1-24) one can deduct that an operating frequency of the generated photons depends to some extent on the energy of the injected electrons. In addition, an operating frequency of the generated photons also depends on operating temperature of the thermostat according to the according to the following relationship ω=Dq2=2D−1 mΔ and according to the following equation Eq. (34):
Δ=2I<Sz>. Eq. (34)
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (B1) further comprises: (B2) generating THz photons by using a merging process between the nonequilibrium magnons in the magnon gain medium.
The given above detailed equations Eqs. (25-34) describe the generation of THz photons by using the merging of two nonequilibrium magnons, and the properties of generated THz photons.
In one embodiment, the method of the present invention further comprises: (C) manipulating photon reflection coefficient of the generated photons at surface area of the magnon gain medium by using reflective and transmission means attached to the surface area of the magnon gain medium. Please, see the apparatus 60 (of
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (C) further comprises: (C1) selecting the reflective and transmission means from the group consisting of: {an optical cavity; and a Fabry-Perot cavity}.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (C) further comprises: (C2) accumulating the generated photons in the magnon gain medium by using the reflective and transmission means attached to the surface area of magnon gain medium. Please, see the apparatus 60 (of
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (C2) further comprises accumulating a threshold number of the generated photons in the magnon gain medium, wherein the threshold number of accumulated photons is substantially sufficient for nonlinear photon-photon interaction process. If this is the case, and if the nonequilibrium magnons generate photons having basic frequency vbasic, the nonlinear photon-photon interaction process can lead to generation of photons having v2basic, v3basic, v4basic, and so on.
In one embodiment, the method of the present invention further comprises: (D) utilizing a waveguide (78 of
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (D) further comprises: (D1) accumulating the generated photons in an outside optical cavity (82 of
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step (D) further comprises: (D2) accumulating a threshold number of generated photons in the outside optical cavity attached to the waveguide, wherein the threshold number of accumulated photons is substantially sufficient for nonlinear photon-photon interaction process (not shown).
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents