Patent Grant
10474227
The present document relates to provision of a virtual reality or augmented reality experience with input having limited degrees of freedom.
The most immersive virtual reality and augmented reality experiences have six degrees of freedom, parallax, and view-dependent lighting. Generating viewpoint video for the user directly from the captured video data can be computationally intensive, resulting in a viewing experience with lag that detracts from the immersive character of the experience. Many dedicated virtual reality headsets have sensors that are capable of sensing the position and orientation of the viewer's head, with three dimensions for each, for a total of six degrees of freedom (6DOF).
However, use of mobile phones for virtual reality is becoming increasingly popular. Many mobile phones are designed to detect orientation, but lack the hardware to detect position with any accuracy. Accordingly, the viewer may feel constrained, as the system may be incapable of responding to changes in the position of his or her head.
Various embodiments of the described system and method facilitate the presentation of virtual reality or augmented reality on devices with limited (i.e., fewer than six) degrees of freedom. In some embodiments, a virtual reality or augmented reality experience may be presented for a viewer through the use of input including only three degrees of freedom, which may be received from a first input device in the form of smartphone or other device that does not directly detect the position of the viewer's head. Rather, the input may include only orientation data indicative of a viewer orientation at which the viewer's head is oriented. The viewer orientation may be mapped to an estimated viewer location. Viewpoint video of a scene may be generated as viewed from a virtual viewpoint with a virtual location corresponding to the estimated viewer location, from along the viewer orientation. The viewpoint video may be displayed for the viewer.
In some embodiments, mapping may be carried out by defining a ray at the viewer orientation, locating an intersection of the ray with a three-dimensional shape, and, based on a location of the intersection, generating the estimated viewer location. The shape may optionally be generally spherical.
Prior to providing the virtual reality or augmented reality experience, a second input device, such as a dedicated virtual reality headset that provides input with six degrees of freedom, may be used to generate calibration data for each of a plurality of calibration orientations of the viewer's head. The calibration data may indicate a calibration viewer orientation at which the viewer's head is oriented, and a calibration viewer position at which the viewer's head is positioned. For each of the calibration positions, the calibration viewer orientation and the calibration viewer position may be used to project a point. The three-dimensional shape may be defined based on locations of the points.
If desired, the three-dimensional shape may be stored in connection with an identity of the viewer. Each viewer may optionally have his or her own customized shape for mapping a viewer orientation to an estimated viewer location.
In some embodiments, the virtual reality or augmented reality experience may be generated based on a video stream captured from multiple viewpoints. Thus, prior to generating the viewpoint video, the video stream may be captured by an image capture device. Generating the viewpoint video may include using at least part of the video stream.
Vantage architecture may be optionally be used. Thus, prior to generation of the viewpoint video, a plurality of locations, distributed throughout a viewing volume, may be designated, at which a plurality of vantages are to be positioned to facilitate viewing of the scene from proximate the locations. For each of the locations, a plurality of images of the scene, captured from viewpoints proximate the location, may be retrieved. The images may be combined to generate a combined image to generate a vantage. Each of the vantages may be stored in a data store. Thus, retrieving at least part of the video stream may include retrieving at least a subset of the vantages, and using the subset to generate the viewpoint video.
Prior to retrieving the subset of the vantages, the subset may be identified based on proximity of the vantages to the subset to the virtual viewpoint. Using the vantages to generate the viewpoint video may include reprojecting at least portions of the combined images of the subset of the vantages to the virtual viewpoint.
The accompanying drawings illustrate several embodiments. Together with the description, they serve to explain the principles of the embodiments. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular embodiments illustrated in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not intended to limit scope.
Multiple methods for capturing image and/or video data in a light-field volume and creating virtual views from such data are described. The described embodiments may provide for capturing continuous or nearly continuous light-field data from many or all directions facing away from the capture system, which may enable the generation of virtual views that are more accurate and/or allow viewers greater viewing freedom.
For purposes of the description provided herein, the following definitions are used:
In addition, for ease of nomenclature, the term “camera” is used herein to refer to an image capture device or other data acquisition device. Such a data acquisition device can be any device or system for acquiring, recording, measuring, estimating, determining and/or computing data representative of a scene, including but not limited to two-dimensional image data, three-dimensional image data, and/or light-field data. Such a data acquisition device may include optics, sensors, and image processing electronics for acquiring data representative of a scene, using techniques that are well known in the art. One skilled in the art will recognize that many types of data acquisition devices can be used in connection with the present disclosure, and that the disclosure is not limited to cameras. Thus, the use of the term “camera” herein is intended to be illustrative and exemplary, but should not be considered to limit the scope of the disclosure. Specifically, any use of such term herein should be considered to refer to any suitable device for acquiring image data. Further, although the ensuing description focuses on video capture for use in virtual reality or augmented reality, the systems and methods described herein may be used in a much wider variety of video and/or imaging applications.
The phrase “virtual camera” refers to a designation of a position and/or orientation of a hypothetical camera from which a scene may be viewed. A virtual camera may, for example, be placed within a scene to mimic the actual position and/or orientation of a viewer's head, viewing the scene as part of a virtual reality or augmented reality experience.
Planar Projection
Projection may reduce information in a three-dimensional scene to information on a two-dimensional surface, and subsequently to sample values in a two-dimensional image. The information may include color, although any scene values may be projected. The surface may be flat, in which case the information on the surface corresponds directly to like-positioned pixels in the two-dimensional image. Alternatively, the projection surface may be curved, in which case the correspondence between surface values and image pixels may be more complex. Because planar projection is easier to depict and understand, it will be used in the following discussion of
Referring to
Color information may be computed for each pixel location in the camera-captured image through processing by a camera pipeline, as implemented in modern digital cameras and mobile devices. Depth information may also be computed for each pixel location in the camera-captured image. Certain digital cameras compute this information directly, for example by measuring the time of flight of photons from the scene object to the camera. If the camera does not provide pixel depths, they may be computed by evaluating the differences in apparent positions (the parallax) of scene points in multiple camera images with overlapping fields of view. Various depth computation systems and methods are set forth in U.S. application Ser. No. 14/837,465, for “Depth-Based Application of Image Effects,”, filed Aug. 27, 2015 and issued on May 2, 2017 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,639,945, and U.S. application Ser. No. 14/834,924, for “Active Illumination for Enhanced Depth Map Generation,”, filed Aug. 2, 2015, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The results of processing a camera-captured image through a camera pipeline, and of computing pixel depths (if they are not provided by the camera), may be an RGB image or an RGBD image. Such images may encode both color and depth in each pixel. Color may be encoded as red, green, and blue values (RGB) or may have any other encoding. Depth may be encoded as metric distance or as normalized reciprocal distance (NWC depth), or with other encodings, and may further correspond to axial depth (measured perpendicular to the plane of projection) or as radial depth (measured along the ray from the center of perspective through the center of the pixel) or with other geometric measures.
Using the techniques of three-dimensional computer graphics, an RGBD image of a virtual scene may be computed with a virtual camera, substantially duplicating the operation of a physical camera in a physical scene (but without the requirement of correcting distortions from the ideal two-dimensional planar projection). The coordinates of scene points may be known during computer-graphic image generation, so pixel depths may be known directly, without requiring computation using multiple RGBD images or time-of-flight measurement.
Reprojection
As indicated previously, the goal may be interactive computation of eye images for viewpoint video for arbitrary positions and orientations. These eye images may be computed by direct projection from the scene, but the scene may no longer available. Thus, it may be necessary to compute the eye images from information in the RGBD camera images, a process that may be referred to as reprojection, because the RGBD camera images are themselves projections, and this step may involve computation of another projection from them.
Referring to
Referring to
The challenges set forth above will be discussed in further detail below. In this discussion, the source (for example, RGBD) images and reprojected images will continue to be referred to as camera images and eye images, respectively.
Filling Disocclusions
Based on the discussion above, it can be seen that one difficulty in forming a complete eye image by reprojection is that the eye image formed by reprojecting a single camera image may have disocclusions. Of course objects that are not visible to one camera may be visible to another, so disocclusions may be filled by reprojecting multiple camera images. In this approach, each eye pixel may be computed from the set of non-occluded camera pixels that correspond to it.
Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that any camera-image pixels will map to a specific eye-image pixel. In other words, it is possible that a correctly formed eye-image includes a portion of the scene that no camera image sees. In this case, the values of disoccluded pixels may be inferred from the values of nearby pixels, a process that is known in the art as hallucination. Other approaches to assigning values (such as color and/or depth) to disoccluded pixels are possible.
Discarding Occluded Pixels
When multiple camera images are reprojected (perhaps to increase the likelihood of filling disocclusions by reprojection), the possibility increases that the set of camera pixels that map to an eye pixel will describe scene objects at more than one distance. Thus, pixels may be included that encode objects that are not visible to the eye. The pixel values in a correctly-formed eye image may advantageously avoid taking into account camera pixels that encode occluded objects; thus, it may be advantageous to identify and discard occluded pixels. Occluded pixels encode occluded scene objects, which are by definition farther from the eye than visible objects. Occluded pixels may therefore be identified by first computing, and then comparing, the depths of reprojected pixels. The computation may be geometrically obvious, and may be an automatic side effect of the transformation of three-dimensional points using 4×4 matrixes.
Handling View-Dependent Shading
The apparent color of a point in three-dimensional space may vary depending on the position of the viewer, a phenomenon known as view-dependent shading in the field of three-dimensional computer graphics. Because the cameras in the capture rig have their centers of perspective at different positions, it follows that camera pixels that map to the same scene point may have different colors. So when multiple camera pixels map to the same eye pixel, the pixel selection process may advantageously consider view-dependent shading in addition to occlusion.
Except in the extreme case of a perfectly reflective object, view-dependent shading may result in mathematically continuous variation in apparent color as the view position is moved. Thus, pixels from a camera near the eye are more likely to correctly convey color than are pixels from cameras further from the eye. More precisely, for a specific eye pixel, the best camera pixel may be the non-occluded pixel that maps to that eye pixel and whose mapping has the smallest reprojection angle (the angle 270 between the camera ray 250 and the eye ray 260, as depicted in
Achieving High Performance
To form a high-quality eye image, it may be advantageous to identify the best camera pixels and use them to compute each eye pixel. Unfortunately, the unidirectionality of reprojection, and the scene-dependent properties of occlusion and disocclusion, make it difficult to directly determine which camera image has the best pixel for a given eye pixel. Further, the properties of view-dependent shading make it certain that, for many view positions, the best camera pixels will be distributed among many of the camera images.
Referring to
Vantages
Video data of an environment may be prepared for use in the presentation of an immersive experience, such as a virtual reality or augmented reality experience. Such an experience may have a designated viewing volume, relative to the environment, within which a viewer can freely position his or her head to view the environment from the corresponding position and viewing direction. The view generated for the viewer may be termed “viewpoint video.” The goal may be to capture video of an environment, then to allow the viewer to enter and move around within a live playback of the captured scene, experiencing it as though he or she were present in the environment. Viewer motion may be arbitrary within a constrained volume called the viewing volume. The viewing experience is immersive, meaning that the viewer sees the environment from his or her position and orientation as though he or she were actually in the scene at that position and orientation.
The video data may be captured with a plurality of cameras, each attached to a capture rig such as a tiled camera array, with positions and orientations chosen such that the cameras' fields of view overlap within the desired capture field of view. The video data may be processed into an intermediate format to better support interactive playback. The viewer may wear a head-mounted display (HMD) such as the Oculus, which both tracks the viewer's head position and orientation, and facilitates the display of separately computed images to each eye at a high (e.g., 90 Hz) frame rate.
For playback to be immersive, the images presented to the viewer's eyes are ideally correct for both the position and orientation of his eyes. In general, the position and orientation of an eye will not match that of any camera, so it may be necessary to compute the eye's image from one or more camera images at position(s) and/or orientation(s) that are different from those of the eye. There are many challenges involved in the performance of these computations, or reprojections, as described previously, to generate views interactively and with sufficient quality. This disclosure outlines some of the challenges and identifies aspects of intermediate formats that may help to surmount them.
More specifically, in order to ensure that performance can be maintained in a manner that avoids disruption of the virtual reality or augmented reality experience as eye images are generated for viewpoint video, reprojection may be carried out twice. First, as a non-time-critical preprocessing step (before the experience is initiated), the camera images may be reprojected into vantages. Each vantage may include an RGBD image whose centers of perspective are distributed throughout the three-dimensional viewing volume. During this step, there is time to reproject as many camera images as necessary to find the best camera pixels for each vantage pixel.
Each of the vantages may be an image computed from the camera images. The vantages may have positions that are distributed throughout a 3D viewing volume. Viewpoint video can then be interactively computed from the vantages rather than directly from the camera images (or generally from images corresponding to the camera positions). Each vantage may represent a view of the environment from the corresponding location, and may thus be a reprojected image. Metadata may be added to the reprojection that defines each vantage; the metadata may include, for example, the location of the vantage in three-dimensional space.
Vantages may, in some embodiments, be evenly distributed throughout a viewing volume. In the alternative, the vantages may be unevenly distributed. For example, vantage density may be greater in portions of the viewing volume that are expected to be more likely to be visited and/or of greater interest to the viewer of the experience.
Reprojection of the video data into the vantages may also include color distribution adjustments. For example, in order to facilitate the proper display of view-dependent shading effects, the reprojected images that define the vantages may be adjusted such that each one has the closest possible position to the desired view-dependent shading. This may enable proper display of reflections, bright spots, and/or other shading aspects that vary based on the viewpoint from which the scene is viewed.
Vantages and tiles are also described in related U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,877 for “Spatial Random Access Enabled Video System with a Three-Dimensional Viewing Volume,”, filed on May 9, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. One exemplary method for generating such vantages will be shown and described subsequently, in connection with
Once all the vantages exist, eye images may be formed interactively (during the experience), reprojecting only the small number of vantages (for example, four) whose centers of perspective tightly surround the eye position. Vantages may be distributed throughout the viewing volume to ensure that such vantages exist for all eye positions within the viewing volume. Thus, all vantage pixels may provide accurate (if not ideal) view-dependent shading. By selecting vantages that surround the eye, it may be likely that at least one vantage “sees” farther behind simple occlusions (such as the edges of convex objects) than the eye does. Accordingly, disocclusions are likely to be filled in the eye images.
It may be desirable to reproject the viewpoint video from the vantages in such a manner that centers of perspective can be altered without jarring changes. As the viewer moves between vantages, the change in imagery should be gradual, unless there is a reason for a sudden change. Thus, it may be desirable to generate the viewpoint video as a function of the vantages at the vertices of a polyhedron. As the viewer's viewpoint moves close to one vertex of the polyhedron, that vantage may provide the bulk of the viewpoint video delivered to the viewer.
Moving within the polyhedron may cause the viewpoint video to contain a different mix of the vantages at the vertices of the polyhedron. Positioning the viewpoint on the face of the polyhedron may cause only the vantages on that face to be used in the calculation of the viewpoint video. As the viewpoint moves into a new polyhedron, the vantages of that polyhedron may be used to generate the viewpoint video. The viewpoint video may always be a linear combination of the vantages at the vertices of the polyhedron containing the viewpoint to be rendered. A linear interpolation, or “lerp” function may be used. Barycentric interpolation may additionally or alternatively be used for polyhedra that are tetrahedral or cuboid in shape. Other types of interpolation may be used for other types of space-filling polyhedra.
In some embodiments, in order to enable efficient identification of the four vantages that closely surround the eye, vantage positions may be specified as the vertices of a space-filling set of polyhedra in the form of tetrahedra. The tetrahedra may be sized to meet any desired upper bound on the distance of the eye from a surrounding vantage. While it is not possible to fill space with Platonic tetrahedra, many other three-dimensional tilings are possible. For example, the view volume may be tiled with regular cuboids, as depicted in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It may desirable for the tetrahedra 910 to match up at faces of the cube 720. This may be accomplished by either subdividing appropriately, or by reflecting the subdivision of the cube 720 at odd positions in each of the three dimensions. In some embodiments subdivisions that match at cuboid faces may better support Barycentric interpolation, which will be discussed subsequently, and is further set forth in Barycentric Coordinates for Convex Sets, Warren, J., Schaefer, S., Hirani, A. N. et al., Adv Comput Math (2007) 27:319.
In alternative embodiments, other polyhedra besides tetrahedra may be used to tile the viewing volume. Generally, such polyhedra may require that more vantages be at considered during eye image formation. For example, the cuboid tiling may be used directly, with a viewpoint within the cube 720 rendered based on reprojection of the vantages 710 at the corners of the cube 720. However, in such a case, eight vantages would need to be used to render the eye images. Accordingly, the use of tiled tetrahedra may provide computational advantages. In other embodiments, irregular spacing of polyhedral may be used. This may help reduce the number of vantages that need to be created and stored, but may also require additional computation to determine which of the polyhedra contains the viewer's current viewpoint.
A further benefit may be derived from polyhedral tiling. Barycentric interpolation may be used to compute the relative closeness of the eye position to each of the four surrounding vantages. These relative distances may be converted to weights used to linearly combine non-occluded vantage pixels at each eye pixel, rather than simply selecting the best among them. As known in the three-dimensional graphic arts, such linear combination (often referred to as lerping) may ensure that eye pixels change color smoothly, not suddenly, as the eye position is moved incrementally. This is true in a static scene and may remain approximately true when objects and lighting in the scene are dynamic.
Barycentric interpolation is particularly desirable because it is easy to compute and has properties that ensure smoothness as the eye position moves from one polyhedron to another. Specifically, when the eye is on a polyhedron facet, only the vertices that define that facet have non-zero weights. As a result, two polyhedra that share a facet may agree on all vertex weights because all but those at the facet vertices may be zero, while those on the facet may be identical. Hence, there may be no sudden change in color as the viewer moves his or her eyes within the viewing volume, from one polyhedron to another.
Another property of Barycentric interpolation, however, is that when the eye is inside the polyhedron, rather than on a facet surface, all polyhedron vertex weights may be nonzero. Accordingly, all vantages may advantageously be reprojected and their pixels lerped to ensure continuity in color as the eye moves through the polyhedron. Thus performance may be optimized by tiling with the polyhedron that has the fewest vertices, which is the tetrahedron.
Non-Planar Projection
Cameras and eyes have fields of view that are much smaller than 180°. Accordingly, their images can be represented as planar projections. However, it may be desirable for vantages to have much larger fields of view, such as full 360°×180; it is not possible to represent images with such large fields of view as planar projections. Their surfaces of projection must be curved. Fortunately, all of the techniques described previously work equally well with non-planar projections.
Referring to
Virtual Cameras and Scenes
Just as vantages may be created from images of a physical scene captured by a physical camera, they may also be created from images created by virtual cameras of a virtual scene, using the techniques of three-dimensional computer graphics. Vantages may be composed of physical images, virtual images, and/or a mixture of physical and virtual images. Any techniques known in the art for rendering and/or reprojecting a three-dimensional scene may be used. It is furthermore possible that vantages be rendered directly (or in any combination of reprojection and direct rendering) using virtual cameras, which may populate a three-dimensional volume without occluding each other's views of the virtual scene.
Center of Depth
As described thus far, depth values in an RGBD image may be measured relative to the center of perspective, such as the center of perspective 110 in
Referring to
The depth values in RGBD vantages may be computed in a different manner, relative to a shared center of depth, rather than to the center of perspective of that vantage. The shared point may be at the center of a distribution of vantages, for example. And although both radial and axial depth values may be measured relative to a point other than the center of perspective, measuring depth radially from a shared center of depth has multiple properties that may be advantageous for vantages, including but not limited to the following:
Referring to
Vantage Generation
Referring to
In a step 1322, the video data may be pre-processed. Pre-processing may entail application of one or more steps known in the art for processing video data, or more particularly, light-field video data. In some embodiments, the step 1322 may include adding depth to the video stream through the use of depth data captured contemporaneously with the video data (for example, through the use of LiDAR or other depth measurement systems) and/or via application of various computational steps to extract depth information from the video stream itself.
In a step 1324, the video data may be post-processed. Post-processing may entail application of one or more steps known in the art for processing video data, or more particularly, light-field video data. In some embodiments, the step 1324 may include color balancing, artifact removal, blurring, sharpening, and/or any other process known in the processing of conventional and/or light-field video data.
In a step 1330, a plurality of locations may be designated within a viewing volume. The locations may be distributed throughout the viewing volume such that one or more vantages are close to each possible position of the viewer's head within the viewing volume. Thus, the vantages may be used to generate viewpoint video with accuracy. Notably, the viewing volume may move or change in shape over time, relative to the environment. Thus, the locations of vantages may be designated for each of multiple time frames within the duration of the experience.
The locations may be designated automatically through the use of various computer algorithms, designated manually by one or more individuals, or designated through a combination of automated and manual methods. In some examples, the locations may be automatically positioned, for example, in an even density within the viewing volume. Then, one or more individuals, such as directors or editors, may modify the locations of the vantages in order to decide which content should be presented with greater quality and/or speed. Use of importance metrics to set vantage locations is set forth in related U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,808 for “Adaptive Control for Immersive Experience Delivery,”, filed on May 9, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In a step 1340, for each of the locations, images may be retrieved from the video data, from capture locations representing viewpoints proximate the location. The images may, in some embodiments, be images directly captured by a camera or sensor of a camera array positioned proximate the location. Additionally or alternatively, the images may be derived from directly captured images through the use of various extrapolation and/or combination techniques.
The images retrieved in the step 1340 may optionally include not only color data, such as RGB values, for each pixel, but also depth data. Thus, the images may, for example, be in RGBD format, with values for red, green, blue, and depth for each pixel. The depth values for the pixels may be measured during capture of the image through the use of depth measurement sensors, such as LiDAR modules and the like, or the depth values may be computed by comparing images captured by cameras or sensors at different locations, according to various methods known in the art.
In some embodiments, the output from the cameras used to capture the video data may be stored in two files per camera image: 00000_rgba.exr and 00000_adist.exr. The RGBA file is a 4-channel half-float EXR image, with linear SRGB-space color encoding and alpha indicating confidence in the validity of the pixel. Zero may represent no confidence, while one may represent high confidence. Alpha may be converted to a binary validity: true (valid) if alpha is greater than one half, false (invalid) otherwise. The axial distance file is a 1-channel half-float EXR image, with pixels that are axial distances (parallel to the line of sight) from (the plane of) the center of perspective to the nearest surface in the scene. These distances may have to be positive to represent valid distances; zero may be used to indicate an invalid pixel. Further, these distances may all be within a range with a ratio of far-to-near that is less than 100. The ratio of far-to-near of the range may beneficially be closer to ten.
In some embodiments, the following two files per camera image may exist: 00000.rgb.jpeg and 00000.z.bus. The RGB file may be a standard JPEG compression, using SRGB nonlinear encoding or the like. In other examples, other encoding methods similar to JPEG non-linear encoding may be used. The Z file contains radial z values in normalized window coordinates, represented as 16-bit unsigned integers. The term “normalized window coordinates” is used loosely because the depth values may be transformed using the NWC transform, but may be radial, not axial, and thus may not be true NWC coordinates. Alternatively, it is further possible to cause these radial distances to be measured from a point other than the center of perspective, for example, from the center of the camera or camera array used to capture the images. These output files may be further processed by compressing them using a GPU-supported vector quantization algorithm or the like.
In some embodiments, two JSON files are provided in addition to the image files captured by the camera or camera array. The first, captured_scene.json, describes the capture rig (camera locations, orientations, and fields of view) and the input and desired output file formats. The second, captured_resample.json, describes which and how many vantages are to be made, including details on the reprojection algorithm, the merge algorithm, and the projection type of the vantages. The projection type of the vantages may be, for example, cylindrical or equirectangular. This data may be referenced in steps of the method 1300, such as the step 1350 and the step 1360.
In a step 1350, the images (or, in the case of video, video streams) retrieved in the step 1340 may be reprojected to each corresponding vantage location. If desired, video data from many viewpoints may be used for each vantage, since this process need not be carried out in real-time, but may advantageously be performed prior to initiation of the virtual reality or augmented reality experience.
In a step 1360, the images reprojected in the step 1350 may be combined to generate a combined image. The reprojected images may be combined in various ways. According to some embodiments, the reprojected images may be combined by computing a fitness value for each pixel of the images to be combined. Linear interpolation may be used. The fitness value may be an indication of confidence in the accuracy of that pixel, and/or the desirability of making that pixel viewable by the viewer. A simple serial algorithm or the like may be used to select, for each pixel of the combined image for a location, the reprojected image pixel at the corresponding position that has the best fitness value. This may be the algorithm included in the captured_resample.json file referenced previously. There is no limit to the number of camera images that can be combined into a single combined image for a vantage. Neighboring vantage pixels may come from different cameras, so there is no guarantee of spatial coherence.
In a step 1390, the vantages may be used to generate viewpoint video for a user. This step can include reprojection and subsequent combination of vantage images. The viewpoint video may be generated in real-time based on the position and/or orientation of the viewer's head. The viewpoint video may thus present a user-movable view of the scene in the course of a virtual reality or augmented reality experience. The viewpoint video may, for any given frame, be generated by reprojecting multiple vantages to the viewer's viewpoint. A relatively small number of vantages may be used to enable this process to be carried out in real-time, so that the viewpoint video is delivered to the HMD with an imperceptible or nearly imperceptible delay. In some embodiments, only four vantages may be combined to reproject the viewpoint video.
Lerping and/or fitness values may again be used to facilitate and/or enhance the combination, as in the step 1360. If desired, the fitness values used in the step 1390 may be the same as those connected to the pixels that were retained for use in each vantage in the step 1360. Additionally or alternatively, new fitness values may be used, for example, based on the perceived relevance of each vantage to the viewpoint for which viewpoint video is to be generated.
Reprojection of vantages to generate viewpoint video may additionally or alternatively be carried out as set forth in related U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,877 for “Spatial Random Access Enabled Video System with a Three-Dimensional Viewing Volume,”, filed on May 9, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In a step 1392, the viewpoint video may be displayed for the user. This may be done, for example, by displaying the video on a head-mounted display (HMD) worn by the user, and/or on a different display. The method 1300 may then end 1398.
The steps of the method 1300 may be reordered, omitted, replaced with alternative steps, and/or supplemented with additional steps not specifically described herein. The steps set forth above will be described in greater detail subsequently.
Virtual Reality Display
Referring to
Vantage Distribution
As indicated previously, the video data for a virtual reality or augmented reality experience may be divided into a plurality of vantages, each of which represents the view from one location in the viewing volume. More specifically, a vantage is a portion of video data, such as an RGBD image, that exists as part of multiple portions of video data at centers of perspective distributed through a viewing volume. A vantage can have any desired field-of-view (e.g. 90° horizontal×90° vertical, or 360° horizontal×180 vertical) and pixel resolution. A viewing volume may be populated with vantages in three-dimensional space at some density.
Based on the position of the viewer's head, which may be determined by measuring the position of the headset worn by the viewer, the system may interpolate from a set of vantages to render the viewpoint video in the form of the final left and right eye view, such as the left headset view 1410 and the right headset view 1420 of
The vantage density may be uniform throughout the viewing volume, or may be non-uniform. A non-uniform vantage density may enable the density of vantages in any region of the viewing volume to be determined based on the likelihood the associated content will be viewed, the quality of the associated content, and/or the like. Thus, if desired, importance metrics may be used to establish vantage density for any given region of a viewing volume.
Referring to
Referring to
Input with Limited Degrees of Freedom
Virtual reality or augmented reality may be presented in connection with various hardware elements. By way of example,
The virtual reality headset 1700 may also have additional components not shown in
In some embodiments, a virtual reality or augmented reality experience may be presented on a device that provides data regarding the viewer with only three degrees of freedom (3DOF). For example, in some embodiments, the virtual reality headset 1700 may have user input 1740 that only receives orientation data, and not position data, for the viewer's head. In particular, where the virtual reality headset incorporates a smartphone or other multi-function device, such a device may have gyroscopes and/or other sensors that can detect rotation of the device about three axes, but may lack any sensors that can detect the position of the device within a viewing environment. As a result, the virtual reality experience presented to the viewer may seem unresponsive to motion of his or her head.
In some embodiments, the orientation data provided by such a device may be used to estimate position, with accuracy sufficient to simulate an experience with six degrees of freedom (translation and rotation about and/or along all three orthogonal axes). This may be done, in some embodiments, by mapping the orientation data to position data. More details will be provided in connection with
Exemplary Method
The method 1800 may include steps similar to those of
In some embodiments, the methods presented herein may be used in connection with computer-generated virtual reality or augmented reality experiences. Such experiences may not necessarily involve retrieval of a video stream, since the client computing device may generate video on the fly based on a scene that has been modeled in three-dimensions within the computer. Thus, the step 1320, the step 1322, the step 1324, the step 1330, the step 1340, the step 1350, and the step 1360 may be omitted in favor of steps related to generation and storage of the three-dimensional environment. Similarly, in such embodiments, the step 1390 would use the three-dimensional environment, rather than the vantages, to generate viewpoint video. However, for illustrative purposes, the following description assumes that the virtual reality or augmented reality experience includes at least some element of captured video that is to be presented to the viewer.
As shown in
In a step 1322, the video data may be pre-processed. Pre-processing may entail application of one or more steps known in the art for processing video data, or more particularly, light-field video data, such as the addition of depth.
In a step 1324, the video data may be post-processed. Post-processing may entail application of one or more steps known in the art for processing video data, or more particularly, light-field video data.
In a step 1330, a plurality of locations may be designated within a viewing volume, for subsequent use as vantages. The locations may be distributed throughout the viewing volume such that one or more vantages are close to each possible position of the viewer's head within the viewing volume.
In a step 1340, for each of the locations, images may be retrieved from the video data, from capture locations representing viewpoints proximate the location. The images may, in some embodiments, be images directly captured by a camera or sensor of a camera array positioned proximate the location. Additionally or alternatively, the images may be derived from directly captured images through the use of various extrapolation and/or combination techniques. The images retrieved in the step 1340 may include not only color data, such as RGB values, for each pixel, but also depth data.
In a step 1350, the images (or, in the case of video, video streams) retrieved in the step 1340 may be reprojected to each corresponding vantage location. If desired, video data from many viewpoints may be used for each vantage, since this process need not be carried out in real-time, but may advantageously be performed prior to initiation of the virtual reality or augmented reality experience. In a step 1360, the images reprojected in the step 1350 may be combined to generate a combined image for each of the vantages.
In a step 1820, the viewer may use a calibration device, to provide calibration data. The calibration device may be a virtual reality headset like the virtual reality headset 1700 of
The step 1820 may be designed to determine the manner in which a specific viewer translates his or head (i.e., moves the head forward, backward, left, right, upward, or downward) in order to look in each of various directions. In this disclosure, reference to a viewer's head refers, more specifically, to the point midway between the viewer's eyes. This point will move in three dimensions as the viewer rotates his or her neck to look in different directions. The step 1820 may include having the viewer move his or her head to look in a variety of directions with the virtual reality headset on and gathering both orientation data and position data. The position and orientation of the viewer's head may be logged in each of the orientations.
In a step 1830, the calibration data collected in the step 1820 may be used to project points onto a shape. For example, a point cloud may be plotted, with one point for the location of the viewer's head in each of the calibration orientations. The points may simply be placed in a three-dimensional grid, according to the actual location of the viewer's head, in three-dimensional space.
In a step 1840, a shape may be defined based on the points projected in the step 1830. In some embodiments, the shape may be fitted to the point cloud. A wide variety of shapes may be used. In some embodiments, a spherical shape may be fitted to the point cloud. In alternative embodiments, a different shape may be used, such as a three-dimensional spline shape or the like. Use of a sphere may be advantageous in that a sphere fits well with the kinematics of most viewers' heads, and is computationally simple, since only two parameters (center location and radius) need be identified. However, in some embodiments, more complex shapes with more than two parameters may be used.
In a step 1850, the shape (or parameters representative of the shape) may be stored in connection with the viewer's identity. Thus, when it is time to provide the virtual reality or augmented reality experience, the viewer's identity may be entered (for example, based on viewer selection) to enable use of the shape pertaining to him or her for mapping viewer orientation to estimated viewer location.
The step 1820, the step 1830, the step 1840, and the step 1850 are optional. In some embodiments, no viewer-specific calibration data may be collected. Rather, calibration may be performed with respect to a single viewer, and the corresponding shape may simply be used for all viewers. If desired, the parameters may be adjusted based on various anatomical features of the viewer (such as height) in an attempt to customize the shape to a new viewer without viewer-specific calibration. However, due to variations in anatomy, posture, and kinematics, it may be possible to more accurately map viewer orientation to estimated viewer location through the use of calibration data specific to the individual viewer, as obtained in the step 1820, the step 1830, the step 1840, and the step 1850.
In some embodiments, a shape does not need to be generated or referenced. Rather, calibration data may be maintained for each viewer, or for an exemplary viewer, with a lookup table or the like. Such a lookup table may have a listing of viewer orientations, with a matching viewer head position for each viewer orientation. For a viewer orientation that is not on the lookup table, the system may find the closest viewer orientation(s) that are in the lookup table, and may use the corresponding viewer head position(s). Where multiple viewer head positions are used, they may be averaged together, if desired, to provide an estimated viewer head position that is closer to the likely position of the viewer's head, when oriented at the viewer orientation.
Once vantages have been generated, as in the step 1330, the step 1340, the step 1350, and the step 1360, and all desired calibration steps have been completed, as in the step 1820, the step 1830, the step 1840, and the step 1850, the virtual reality or augmented reality experience may commence. The experience may be provided with a virtual reality headset that is only capable of limited degrees of freedom. In some embodiments, this may be a virtual reality headset, such as the virtual reality headset 1700 of
In a step 1860, orientation data may be received from the viewer, for example, via the user input 1740 of the virtual reality headset 1700. This may entail receiving viewer orientation data, with three degrees of freedom (i.e., with the three-dimensional orientation of the viewer specified in any suitable coordinate system). Data regarding the actual position of the viewer's head may not be received. The step 1860 may be carried out in the course of providing the virtual reality or augmented reality experience (i.e., as the viewer is beginning to interact with the virtual or augmented environment).
In a step 1870, the viewer orientation received in the step 1860 may be mapped to an estimated viewer location. This may be done in various ways. As mentioned previously, a shape may be used for the mapping. However, as also set forth previously, a lookup table or other tool may be used.
Where a shape is used, in some embodiments, the viewer orientation may be used to define a ray having a predetermined point of origin relative to the shape. The intersection of the ray with the shape may be located. Then, based on the location of the intersection of the ray with the shape, the estimated viewer location may be generated. In some embodiments, where the shape is defined in a coordinate system that matches that of the viewer, the location of the intersection may be the same as the estimated viewer location.
Where a lookup table or other data structure is used in place of the shape, such a data structure may operate to provide the estimated viewer location based on the viewer orientation. A lookup table, by way of example, may function as set forth above.
Once the estimated viewer location has been obtained, it may be used in place of an actual viewer location (for example, as measured by a virtual reality headset that provides input with six degrees of freedom). Thus, the viewer orientation may be mapped to an estimated viewer location to provide an experience with six degrees of freedom, even though the available input has only three degrees of freedom.
Thus, in a step 1390, the vantages may be used to generate viewpoint video for a user. The viewpoint video may be generated in real-time based on the position and/or orientation of the viewer's head, as described in connection with the method 1300 of
In a step 1392, the viewpoint video may be displayed for the user. This may be done, for example, by displaying the video on a head-mounted display (HMD) worn by the user, such as on the virtual reality headset 1700. The method 1800 may then end 1898.
Exemplary Calibration
As described above, various calibration steps may be carried out in order to provide a relatively accurate mapping between viewer orientation and viewer position. These calibration steps may include, for example, the step 1820, the step 1830, the step 1840, and the step 1850. Exemplary results of performance of the step 1830 will be shown and described in connection with
More particularly, each of the points 1910 may represent the location of the viewer's head as the viewer positions his or her head at various orientations. Since the virtual reality headset worn by the viewer during calibration may be designed to provide data with six degrees of freedom, the calibration data may include accurate viewer orientation and viewer position data. As shown, the viewer may be instructed to move his or her head to look to the right, to and left, downward, and upward. The resulting locations of the viewer's head are plotted in
As shown in
The sphere 2010 may be automatically fitted to the points 1910 through the use of any known mathematical algorithms for fitting a shape to a point cloud. Alternatively, a user may manually fit the sphere 2010 to the points 1910. The sphere 2010 may be positioned such that the points 1910, collectively, are as close as possible to the surface of the sphere 2010. Notably, fitting the sphere 2010 to the points 1910 does not require that the points 1910 lie precisely on the surface of the sphere 2010. Rather, some of the points 1910 may be displaced outwardly from the surface of the sphere 2010, while others may be embedded in the sphere 2010.
As mentioned previously, a different shape may be used for each viewer. Thus, for example, a viewer with a shorter neck and/or a smaller head may have points 1910 that define a smaller sphere 2010 than a viewer with a longer neck and/or a larger head. Although a one-size-fits-all approach may be used, the mapping of viewer orientations to estimated viewer positions may be more accurate if a viewer-specific shape is used.
Exemplary Mapping
Once the shape (for example, the sphere 2010 of
Referring again to
The ray 2020 may extend along a direction that is determined based on the viewer orientation obtained by the virtual reality headset that provides limited degrees of freedom (for example, without measuring the viewer position). In some embodiments, the ray 2020 may extend along the viewer orientation. The ray 2020 may intersect the sphere 2010 at a point 2030 on the surface of the sphere 2010.
The location of the point 2030 may be used to determine the estimated viewer location (i.e., the estimated position of the point midway between the viewer's eyes). In some embodiments, the sphere 2010 may be scaled such that the location of the point 2030 in three-dimensional space is the estimated viewer location. Thus, the sphere 2010 may be used as a tool to easily map each viewer orientation to a corresponding estimated viewer location, so that a six-degree-of-freedom experience can effectively be delivered through a virtual reality headset that senses only three degrees of freedom.
In alternative embodiments, different shapes may be used. For example, in place of the sphere 2010, a three-dimensional spline shape may be used. Such a spline shape may have multiple radii, and may even have concave and convex elements, if desired. A mapping may be provided with such a shape by locating the intersection of a ray with the surface of the shape, in a manner similar to that described in connection with the sphere 2010.
In other alternative embodiments, a shape need not be used. A lookup table or other tool may be used, as described previously. In such cases, a ray need not be projected to carry out the mapping; rather, the mapping may be obtained through the use of the lookup table or other tool. Interpolation or other estimation methods may be used to obtain the estimated viewer location for any viewer orientation not precisely found in the lookup table or other tool.
The above description and referenced drawings set forth particular details with respect to possible embodiments. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the techniques described herein may be practiced in other embodiments. First, the particular naming of the components, capitalization of terms, the attributes, data structures, or any other programming or structural aspect is not mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the techniques described herein may have different names, formats, or protocols. Further, the system may be implemented via a combination of hardware and software, as described, or entirely in hardware elements, or entirely in software elements. Also, the particular division of functionality between the various system components described herein is merely exemplary, and not mandatory; functions performed by a single system component may instead be performed by multiple components, and functions performed by multiple components may instead be performed by a single component.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Some embodiments may include a system or a method for performing the above-described techniques, either singly or in any combination. Other embodiments may include a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium and computer program code, encoded on the medium, for causing a processor in a computing device or other electronic device to perform the above-described techniques.
Some portions of the above are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a memory of a computing device. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps (instructions) leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. Furthermore, it is also convenient at times, to refer to certain arrangements of steps requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities as modules or code devices, without loss of generality.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “displaying” or “determining” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing module and/or device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Certain aspects include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and instructions of described herein can be embodied in software, firmware and/or hardware, and when embodied in software, can be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by a variety of operating systems.
Some embodiments relate to an apparatus for performing the operations described herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computing device selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computing device. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, flash memory, solid state drives, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus. Further, the computing devices referred to herein may include a single processor or may be architectures employing multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.
The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computing device, virtualized system, or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will be apparent from the description provided herein. In addition, the techniques set forth herein are not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the techniques described herein, and any references above to specific languages are provided for illustrative purposes only.
Accordingly, in various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented as software, hardware, and/or other elements for controlling a computer system, computing device, or other electronic device, or any combination or plurality thereof. Such an electronic device can include, for example, a processor, an input device (such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, trackpad, joystick, trackball, microphone, and/or any combination thereof), an output device (such as a screen, speaker, and/or the like), memory, long-term storage (such as magnetic storage, optical storage, and/or the like), and/or network connectivity, according to techniques that are well known in the art. Such an electronic device may be portable or nonportable. Examples of electronic devices that may be used for implementing the techniques described herein include: a mobile phone, personal digital assistant, smartphone, kiosk, server computer, enterprise computing device, desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, consumer electronic device, television, set-top box, or the like. An electronic device for implementing the techniques described herein may use any operating system such as, for example: Linux; Microsoft Windows, available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.; Mac OS X, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; iOS, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; Android, available from Google, Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.; and/or any other operating system that is adapted for use on the device.
In various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented in a distributed processing environment, networked computing environment, or web-based computing environment. Elements can be implemented on client computing devices, servers, routers, and/or other network or non-network components. In some embodiments, the techniques described herein are implemented using a client/server architecture, wherein some components are implemented on one or more client computing devices and other components are implemented on one or more servers. In one embodiment, in the course of implementing the techniques of the present disclosure, client(s) request content from server(s), and server(s) return content in response to the requests. A browser may be installed at the client computing device for enabling such requests and responses, and for providing a user interface by which the user can initiate and control such interactions and view the presented content.
Any or all of the network components for implementing the described technology may, in some embodiments, be communicatively coupled with one another using any suitable electronic network, whether wired or wireless or any combination thereof, and using any suitable protocols for enabling such communication. One example of such a network is the Internet, although the techniques described herein can be implemented using other networks as well.
While a limited number of embodiments has been described herein, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the above description, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the scope of the claims. In addition, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,841 for “Vantage Generation and Interactive Playback,”, filed on May 9, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,808 for “Adaptive Control for Immersive Experience Delivery,”, filed on May 9, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,877 for “Spatial Random Access Enabled Video System with a Three-Dimensional Viewing Volume,”, filed on May 9, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,951 for “Wedge-Based Light-Field Video Capture,”, filed on May 9, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/837,465, for “Depth-Based Application of Image Effects,”, filed Aug. 27, 2015 and issued on May 2, 2017 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,639,945, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/834,924, for “Active Illumination for Enhanced Depth Map Generation,”, filed Aug. 25, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 725567 | Ives | Apr 1903 | A |
| 4383170 | Takagi et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4661986 | Adelson | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4694185 | Weiss | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4920419 | Easterly | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5076687 | Adelson | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5077810 | D'Luna | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5157465 | Kronberg | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5251019 | Moorman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5282045 | Mimura et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5499069 | Griffith | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5572034 | Karellas | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5610390 | Miyano | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5729471 | Jain et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5748371 | Cathey, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757423 | Tanaka et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5818525 | Elabd | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835267 | Mason et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5907619 | Davis | May 1999 | A |
| 5949433 | Klotz | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5974215 | Bilbro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6005936 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021241 | Bilbro et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023523 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028606 | Kolb et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034690 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6061083 | Aritake et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6061400 | Pearlstein et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069565 | Stern et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6075889 | Hamilton, Jr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084979 | Kanade et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091860 | Dimitri | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097394 | Levoy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115556 | Reddington | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6137100 | Fossum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6169285 | Pertrillo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6201899 | Bergen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6221687 | Abramovich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6320979 | Melen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6424351 | Bishop et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6448544 | Stanton et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466207 | Gortler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6476805 | Shum et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6479827 | Hamamoto et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6483535 | Tamburrino et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6529265 | Henningsen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6577342 | Webster | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6587147 | Li | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597859 | Leinhardt et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606099 | Yamada | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6658168 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6674430 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6680976 | Chen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6687419 | Atkin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6697062 | Cabral | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6768980 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6785667 | Orbanes et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6833865 | Fuller et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6842297 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6900841 | Mihara | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6924841 | Jones | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6927922 | George et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7003061 | Wiensky | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7015954 | Foote et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7025515 | Woods | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034866 | Colmenarez et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7079698 | Kobayashi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7102666 | Kanade et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7164807 | Morton | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7206022 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7239345 | Rogina | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7286295 | Sweatt et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7304670 | Hussey et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7329856 | Ma et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7336430 | George | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7417670 | Linzer et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7469381 | Ording | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7477304 | Hu | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7587109 | Reininger | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7620309 | Georgiev | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7623726 | Georgiev | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7633513 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7683951 | Aotsuka | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7687757 | Tseng et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7723662 | Levoy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7724952 | Shum et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7748022 | Frazier | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7847825 | Aoki et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7936377 | Friedhoff et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7936392 | Ng et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7941634 | Georgi | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7945653 | Zuckerberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949252 | Georgiev | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7982776 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8013904 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8085391 | Machida et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8106856 | Matas et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8115814 | Iwase et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8155456 | Babacan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8155478 | Vitsnudel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8189089 | Georgiev et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8228417 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8248515 | Ng et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8259198 | Cote et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8264546 | Witt | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8279325 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8289440 | Knight et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8290358 | Georgiev | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8310554 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8315476 | Georgiev et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8345144 | Georgiev et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8400533 | Szedo | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8400555 | Georgiev et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8411948 | Rother | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8427548 | Lim et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8442397 | Kang et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8446516 | Pitts et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8494304 | Venable et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8531581 | Shroff | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8542933 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8559705 | Ng | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8570426 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8577216 | Li et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8581998 | Ohno | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8589374 | Chaudhri | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8593564 | Border et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8605199 | Imai | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8614764 | Pitts et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8619082 | Ciurea et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8629930 | Brueckner et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8665440 | Kompaniets et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8675073 | Aagaard et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8724014 | Ng et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8736710 | Spielberg | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8736751 | Yun | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8749620 | Pitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8750509 | Renkis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8754829 | Lapstun | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8760566 | Pitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8768102 | Ng et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8797321 | Bertolami et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8811769 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8831377 | Pitts et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8848970 | Aller et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8860856 | Wetsztein et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8879901 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8903232 | Caldwell | Dec 2014 | B1 |
| 8908058 | Akeley et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8948545 | Akeley et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8953882 | Lim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8971625 | Pitts et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8976288 | Ng et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8988317 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 8995785 | Knight et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8997021 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9001226 | Ng et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 9013611 | Szedo | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 9106914 | Doser | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9172853 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9184199 | Pitts et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9201142 | Antao | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9201193 | Smith | Dec 2015 | B1 |
| 9210391 | Mills | Dec 2015 | B1 |
| 9214013 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9262067 | Bell | Feb 2016 | B1 |
| 9294662 | Vondran, Jr. et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9300932 | Knight et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9305375 | Akeley | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9305956 | Pittes et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9386288 | Akeley et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9392153 | Myhre et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9419049 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9467607 | Ng et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9497380 | Jannard et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
| 9607424 | Ng et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9628684 | Liang et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9635332 | Carroll et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9639945 | Oberheu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9647150 | Blasco Claret | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9681069 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9774800 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9858649 | Liang et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9866810 | Knight et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9900510 | Karafin et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
| 9979909 | Kuang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10244266 | Wu | Mar 2019 | B1 |
| 20010048968 | Cox et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053202 | Mazess et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001395 | Davis et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020015048 | Nister | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020061131 | Sawhney | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020109783 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159030 | Frey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020199106 | Hayashi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030043270 | Rafey | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081145 | Seaman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030103670 | Schoelkopf et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117511 | Belz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123700 | Wakao | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030133018 | Ziemkowski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147252 | Fioravanti | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156077 | Balogh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172131 | Ao | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002179 | Barton et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040012688 | Tinnerinno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040012689 | Tinnerinno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101166 | Williams et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114176 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135780 | Nims | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189686 | Tanguay et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212725 | Raskar | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040257360 | Sieckmann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050031203 | Fukuda | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049500 | Babu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050052543 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080602 | Snyder et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050141881 | Taira et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050162540 | Yata | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212918 | Serra et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050253728 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276441 | Debevec | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008265 | Ito | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060023066 | Li et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060050170 | Tanaka | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056040 | Lan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056604 | Sylthe et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072175 | Oshino | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078052 | Dang | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060082879 | Miyoshi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130017 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208259 | Jeon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248348 | Wakao et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250322 | Hall et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256226 | Alon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274210 | Kim | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060285741 | Subbarao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070008317 | Lundstrom | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070019883 | Wong et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030357 | Levien et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070033588 | Landsman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070052810 | Monroe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071316 | Kubo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070081081 | Cheng | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070097206 | Houvener | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070103558 | Cai et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070113198 | Robertson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070140676 | Nakahara | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070188613 | Norbori et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070201853 | Petschnigg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070229653 | Matusik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070230944 | Georgiev | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269108 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070273795 | Jaynes | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080007626 | Wernersson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080012988 | Baharav et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080018668 | Yamauchi | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080031537 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080049113 | Hirai | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080056569 | Williams et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080122940 | Mori | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080129728 | Satoshi | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144952 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152215 | Horie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080168404 | Ording | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080180792 | Georgiev | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080187305 | Raskar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080193026 | Horie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205871 | Utagawa | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226274 | Spielberg | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232680 | Berestov et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080253652 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080260291 | Alakarhu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080266688 | Errando Smet et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080277566 | Utagawa | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080309813 | Watanabe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316301 | Givon | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090027542 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090041381 | Georgiev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090041448 | Georgiev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070710 | Kagaya | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090109280 | Gotsman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128658 | Hayasaka et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128669 | Ng et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135258 | Nozaki | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140131 | Utagawa | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090102956 | Georgiev | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090167909 | Imagawa et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090185051 | Sano | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090185801 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090190022 | Ichimura | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090190024 | Hayasaka et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195689 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090202235 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204813 | Kwan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090207233 | Mauchly et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273843 | Raskar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090290848 | Brown | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090295829 | Georgiev et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309973 | Kogane | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309975 | Gordon | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090310885 | Tamaru | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090321861 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100003024 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011117 | Hristodorescu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100021001 | Honsinger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100026852 | Ng et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100050120 | Ohazama et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100060727 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100097444 | Lablans | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103311 | Makii | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107068 | Butcher et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100111489 | Presler | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100123784 | Ding et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141780 | Tan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142839 | Lakus-Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100201789 | Yahagi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100253782 | Elazary | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265385 | Knight et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277617 | Hollinger | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277629 | Tanaka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303288 | Malone | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100328485 | Imamura et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001858 | Shintani | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110018903 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110019056 | Hirsch et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110025827 | Shpunt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110032338 | Raveendran et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110050864 | Bond | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110050909 | Ellenby | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110063414 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069175 | Mistretta et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110075729 | Dane et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090255 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110091192 | Iwane | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110123183 | Adelsberger et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110129120 | Chan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110129165 | Lim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110148764 | Gao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110149074 | Lee et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110169994 | DiFrancesco et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110194617 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110205384 | Zamowski et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110221947 | Awazu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110242334 | Wilburn et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110242352 | Hikosaka | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110249341 | DiFrancesco et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110261164 | Olesen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110261205 | Sun | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267263 | Hinckley | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267348 | Lin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110273466 | Imai et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110279479 | Rodriguez | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110133649 | Bales et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110292258 | Adler | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293179 | Dikmen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110298960 | Tan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110304745 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311046 | Oka | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110316968 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120014837 | Fehr et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120044330 | Watanabe | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120050562 | Perwass et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120056889 | Carter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120056982 | Katz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120057040 | Park et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120057806 | Backlund et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120062755 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120120240 | Muramatsu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120132803 | Hirato et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120133746 | Bigioi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120147205 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120176481 | Lukk et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120183055 | Hong et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120188344 | Imai | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120201475 | Carmel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120206574 | Shikata et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218463 | Benezra et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120224787 | Imai | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120229691 | Hiasa et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120249529 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120249550 | Akeley | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120249819 | Imai | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120251131 | Henderson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120257065 | Velarde et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120257795 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120268367 | Vertegaal et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120269274 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120271115 | Buerk | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120272271 | Nishizawa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120287246 | Katayama | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120287296 | Fukui | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120287329 | Yahata | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120293075 | Engelen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120300091 | Shroff et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120237222 | Ng et al. | Dec 2012 | A9 |
| 20120321172 | Jachalsky et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130002902 | Ito | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130002936 | Hirama et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130021486 | Richardson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130038696 | Ding et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130041215 | McDowall | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130044290 | Kawamura | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130050546 | Kano | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130064453 | Nagasaka et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130064532 | Caldwell et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130070059 | Kushida | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130070060 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130077880 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130082905 | Ranieri et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130088616 | Ingrassia, Jr. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130093844 | Shuto | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130093859 | Nakamura | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130094101 | Oguchi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130107085 | Ng et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130113981 | Knight et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130120356 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130120605 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130120636 | Baer | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130121577 | Wang | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130127901 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128052 | Catrein et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128081 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128087 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130129213 | Shectman | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130135448 | Nagumo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130176481 | Holmes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130188068 | Said | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130215108 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130215226 | Chauvier et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130222656 | Kaneko | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130234935 | Griffith | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130242137 | Kirkland | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243391 | Park et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130258451 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130262511 | Kuffner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130286236 | Mankowski | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130321574 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130321581 | El-Ghoroury | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130321677 | Cote et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329107 | Burley et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329132 | Tico et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130335596 | Demandoix et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130342700 | Kass | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140002502 | Han | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140002699 | Guan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140003719 | Bai et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140013273 | Ng | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140035959 | Lapstun | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140037280 | Shirakawa | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140049663 | Ng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140059462 | Wernersson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140085282 | Luebke et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140092424 | Grosz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098191 | Rime et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140132741 | Aagaard et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140133749 | Kuo et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140139538 | Barber et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140167196 | Heimgartner et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140168484 | Suzuki | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140176540 | Tosic et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140176592 | Wilburn et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140176710 | Brady | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140177905 | Grefalda | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140184885 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140192208 | Okincha | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140193047 | Grosz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140195921 | Grosz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140204111 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140211077 | Ng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140218540 | Geiss et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140226038 | Kimura | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240463 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240578 | Fishman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245367 | Sasaki | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140267243 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140267639 | Tatsuta | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140300753 | Yin | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140313350 | Keelan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140313375 | Milnar | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140333787 | Venkataraman | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140340390 | Lanman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140347540 | Kang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140354863 | Ahn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140368494 | Sakharnykh et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140368640 | Strandemar et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150042767 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150049915 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150062178 | Matas et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150062386 | Sugawara | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150092071 | Meng et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150097985 | Akeley | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150130986 | Ohnishi | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150161798 | Venkataraman et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150193937 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150206340 | Munkberg et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150207990 | Ford et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223731 | Sahin | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150237273 | Sawadaishi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150264337 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150104101 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150288867 | Kajimura | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150304544 | Eguchi | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150304667 | Suehring et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150310592 | Kano | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150312553 | Ng et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150312593 | Akeley et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150334420 | De Vieeschauwer et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150346832 | Cole et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150370011 | Ishihara | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150370012 | Ishihara | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150373279 | Osborne | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160029002 | Balko | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160029017 | Liang | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160037178 | Lee et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160065931 | Konieczny | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160065947 | Cole et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160142615 | Liang | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160155215 | Suzuki | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160165206 | Huang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160173844 | Knight et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160182893 | Wan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160191823 | El-Ghoroury | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160227244 | Rosewarne | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160247324 | Mullins et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160253837 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160269620 | Romanenko et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160307368 | Akeley | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160307372 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160309065 | Karafin et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160337635 | Nisenzon | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160353006 | Anderson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160353026 | Blonde et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160381348 | Hayasaka | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170031146 | Zheng | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170059305 | Nonn et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170067832 | Ferrara, Jr. et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170078578 | Sato | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170094906 | Liang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170134639 | Pitts et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170139131 | Karafin et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170221226 | Shen | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170237971 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170243373 | Bevensee et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170244948 | Pang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170256036 | Song et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170263012 | Sabater et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170302903 | Ng et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170316602 | Smirnov et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170358092 | Bleibel et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170365068 | Tan et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170374411 | Lederer et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180007253 | Abe | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180012397 | Carothers | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180020204 | Pang et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180024753 | Gewickey et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180033209 | Akeley et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180034134 | Pang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180139436 | Yucer et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180070066 | Knight et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180070067 | Knight et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180082405 | Liang | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180089903 | Pang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180097867 | Pang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180124371 | Kamal et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180158198 | Kamad | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180199039 | Trepte | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101226292 | Jul 2008 | CN |
| 101309359 | Nov 2008 | CN |
| 19624421 | Jan 1997 | DE |
| 2010020100 | Jan 2010 | JP |
| 2011135170 | Jul 2011 | JP |
| 2003052465 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 2006039486 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| 2007092545 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2007092581 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2011010234 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011029209 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011081187 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Wikipedia—Data overlay techniques for real-time visual feed. For example, heads-up displays: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-up_display. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Exchangeable image file format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Expeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EXPEED. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014. |
| Wikipedia—Extensible Metadata Platform: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Platform. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Key framing for video animation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_frame. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Lazy loading of image data: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_loading. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Methods of Variable Bitrate Encoding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_bitrate#Methods_of_VBR_encoding. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Portable Network Graphics format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Unsharp Mask Technique: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking. Retrieved May 3, 2016. |
| Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 24, Issue 3 (Jul. 2005), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 765-776. |
| Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “High Speed Video Using a Dense Camera Array”, 2004. |
| Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002. |
| Williams, L. “Pyramidal Parametrics,” Computer Graphic (1983). |
| Winnemoller, H., et al., “Light Waving: Estimating Light Positions From Photographs Alone”, Eurographics 2005. |
| Wippermann, F. “Chirped Refractive Microlens Array,” Dissertation 2007. |
| Wuu, S., et al., “A Manufacturable Back-Side Illumination Technology Using Bulk Si Substrate for Advanced CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway. |
| Wuu, S., et al., “BSI Technology with Bulk Si Wafer”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway. |
| Xiao, Z. et al., “Aliasing Detection and Reduction in Plenoptic Imaging,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2014. |
| Xu, Xin et al., “Robust Automatic Focus Algorithm for Low Contrast Images Using a New Contrast Measure,” Sensors 2011; 14 pages. |
| Zheng, C. et al., “Parallax Photography: Creating 3D Cinematic Effects from Stills”, Proceedings of Graphic Interface, 2009. |
| Zitnick, L. et al., “High-Quality Video View Interpolation Using a Layered Representation,” Aug. 2004; ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004; vol. 23, Issue 3; pp. 600-608. |
| Zoberbier, M., et al., “Wafer Cameras—Novel Fabrication and Packaging Technologies”, 2009 International Image Senor Workshop, Bergen, Norway, 5 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/967,076, filed Apr. 30, 2018 listing Jiantao Kuang et al. as inventors, entitled “Automatic Lens Flare Detection and Correction for Light-Field Images”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/666,298, filed Aug. 1, 2017 listing Yonggang Ha et al. as inventors, entitled “Focal Reducer With Controlled Optical Properties for Interchangeable Lens Light-Field Camera”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,808, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Adaptive Control for Immersive Experience Delivery”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/864,938, filed Jan. 8, 2018 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “Motion Blur for Light-Field Images”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,553, filed Sep. 13, 2017 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “4D Camera Tracking and Optical Stabilization”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,841, filed May 9, 2017 listing Kurt Akeley et al. as inventors, entitled “Vantage Generation and Interactive Playback”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,951, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Wedge-Based Light-Field Video Capture”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/944,551, filed Apr. 3, 2018 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Generating Dolly Zoom Effect Using Light Field Image Data”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/874,723, filed Jan. 18, 2018 listing Mark Weir et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-Camera Navigation Interface”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/605,037, filed May 25, 2017 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Back-Projection to a Light-Field”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,836, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,942, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking With Grabcut”. |
| Adelsberger, R. et al., “Spatially Adaptive Photographic Flash,” ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report 612, 2008, pp. 1-12. |
| Adelson et al., “Single Lens Stereo with a Plenoptic Camera” IEEE Translation on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 1992. vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-106. |
| Adelson, E. H., and Bergen, J. R. 1991. The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, edited by Michael S. Landy and J. Anthony Movshon. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press. |
| Adobe Systems Inc, “XMP Specification”, Sep. 2005. |
| Adobe, “Photoshop CS6 / in depth: Digital Negative (DNG)”, http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2html. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Agarwala, A., et al., “Interactive Digital Photomontage,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004, vol. 32, No. 3, 2004. |
| Andreas Observatory, Spectrograph Manual: IV. Flat-Field Correction, Jul. 2006. |
| Apple, “Apple iPad: Photo Features on the iPad”, Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Bae, S., et al., “Defocus Magnification”, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 26, Issue 3 (Proc. of Eurographics 2007), pp. 1-9. |
| Belhumeur, Peter et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, pp. 1060-1066. |
| Belhumeur, Peter, et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1999, pp. 33-44, revised version. |
| Bhat, P. et al. “GradientShop: A Gradient-Domain Optimization Framework for Image and Video Filtering,” SIGGRAPH 2010; 14 pages. |
| Bolles, R., et al., “Epipolar-Plane Image Analysis: An Approach to Determining Structure from Motion”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 7-55 (1987). |
| Bourke, Paul, “Image filtering in the Frequency Domain,” pp. 1-9, Jun. 1998. |
| Canon, Canon Speedlite wireless flash system, User manual for Model 550EX, Sep. 1998. |
| Chai, Jin-Xang et al., “Plenoptic Sampling”, ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Annual Conference Series, 2000, pp. 307-318. |
| Chen, S. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with On-Chip Image Compression Based on Predictive Boundary Adaptation and Memoryless QTD Algorithm,” Very Large Scalee Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions, vol. 19, Issue 4; Apr. 2011. |
| Chen, W., et al., “Light Field mapping: Efficient representation and hardware rendering of surface light fields”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 447-456, 2002. |
| Cohen, Noy et al., “Enhancing the performance of the light field microscope using wavefront coding,” Optics Express, vol. 22, issue 20; 2014. |
| Daly, D., “Microlens Arrays” Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Debevec, et al, “A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compoisting” Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2002. |
| Debevec, P., et al., “Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face”, SIGGRAPH 2000. |
| Debevec, P., et al., “Recovering high dynamic radiance maps from photographs”, SIGGRAPH 1997, 369-378. |
| Design of the xBox menu. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Digital Photography Review, “Sony Announce new RGBE CCD,” Jul. 2003. |
| Dorsey, J., et al., “Design and simulation of opera light and projection effects”, in Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 91), vol. 25, 41-50. |
| Dorsey, J., et al., “Interactive design of complex time dependent lighting”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15, 2 (Mar. 1995), 26-36. |
| Dowski et al., “Wavefront coding: a modern method of achieving high performance and/or low cost imaging systems” SPIE Proceedings, vol. 3779, Jul. 1999, pp. 137-145. |
| Dowski, Jr. “Extended Depth of Field Through Wave-Front Coding,” Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 11, Apr. 10, 1995; pp. 1859-1866. |
| Duparre, J. et al., “Micro-Optical Artificial Compound Eyes,” Institute of Physics Publishing, Apr. 2006. |
| Eisemann, Elmar, et al., “Flash Photography Enhancement via Intrinsic Relighting”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
| Fattal, Raanan, et al., “Multiscale Shape and Detail Enhancement from Multi-light Image Collections”, SIGGRAPH 2007. |
| Fernando, Randima, “Depth of Field—A Survey of Techniques,” GPU Gems. Boston, MA; Addison-Wesley, 2004. |
| Fitzpatrick, Brad, “Camlistore”, Feb. 1, 2011. |
| Fujifilm, Super CCD EXR Sensor by Fujifilm, brochure reference No. EB-807E, 2008. |
| Georgiev, T. et al., “Reducing Plenoptic Camera Artifacts,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1955-1968; 2010. |
| Georgiev, T., et al., “Spatio-Angular Resolution Tradeoff in Integral Photography,” Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2006. |
| Georgiev, T., et al., “Suppersolution with Plenoptic 2.0 Cameras,” Optical Society of America 2009; pp. 1-3. |
| Georgiev, T., et al., “Unified Frequency Domain Analysis of Lightfield Cameras” (2008). |
| Georgiev, T., et al., Plenoptic Camera 2.0 (2008). |
| Girod, B., “Mobile Visual Search”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jul. 2011. |
| Gortler et al., “The lumigraph” SIGGRAPH 96, pp. 43-54. |
| Groen et al., “A Comparison of Different Focus Functions for Use in Autofocus Algorithms,” Cytometry 6:81-91, 1985. |
| Haeberli, Paul “A Multifocus Method for Controlling Depth of Field” GRAPHICA Obscura, 1994, pp. 1-3. |
| Heide, F. et al., “High-Quality Computational Imaging Through Simple Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, SIGGRAPH 2013; pp. 1-7. |
| Heidelberg Collaboratory for Image Processing, “Consistent Depth Estimation in a 4D Light Field,” May 2013. |
| Hirigoyen, F., et al., “1.1 um Backside Imager vs. Frontside Image: an optics-dedicated FDTD approach”, IEEE 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop. |
| Huang, Fu-Chung et al., “Eyeglasses-free Display: Towards Correcting Visual Aberrations with Computational Light Field Displays,” ACM Transaction on Graphics, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-12. |
| Isaksen, A., et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields,” SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306. |
| Ives H., “Optical properties of a Lippman lenticulated sheet,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 21, 171 (1931). |
| Ives, H. “Parallax Panoramagrams Made with a Large Diameter Lens”, Journal of the Optical Society of America; 1930. |
| Jackson et al., “Selection of a Convolution Function for Fourier Inversion Using Gridding” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Sep. 1991, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 473-478. |
| Kautz, J., et al., “Fast arbitrary BRDF shading for low-frequency lighting using spherical harmonics”, in Eurographic Rendering Workshop 2002, 291-296. |
| Koltun, et al., “Virtual Occluders: An Efficient Interediate PVS Representation”, Rendering Techniques 2000: Proc. 11th Eurographics Workshop Rendering, pp. 59-70, Jun. 2000. |
| Kopf, J., et al., Deep Photo: Model-Based Photograph Enhancement and Viewing, SIGGRAPH Asia 2008. |
| Lehtinen, J., et al. “Matrix radiance transfer”, in Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 59-64, 2003. |
| Lesser, Michael, “Back-Side Illumination”, 2009. |
| Levin, A., et al., “Image and Depth from a Conventional Camera with a Coded Aperture”, SIGGRAPH 2007, pp. 1-9. |
| Levoy et al.,“Light Field Rendering” SIGGRAPH 96 Proceeding, 1996. pp. 31-42. |
| Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging” IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55. |
| Levoy, M. “Light Field Photography and Videography,” Oct. 18, 2005. |
| Levoy, M. “Stanford Light Field Microscope Project,” 2008; http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lfmicroscope/, 4 pages. |
| Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Contrast Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010. |
| Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Phase Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010. |
| Levoy, M., et al., “Light Field Microscopy,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 25, No. 3, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2006. |
| Liang, Chia-Kai, et al., “Programmable Aperture Photography: Multiplexed Light Field Acquisition”, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2008. |
| Lippmann, “Reversible Prints”, Communication at the French Society of Physics, Journal of Physics, 7 , 4, Mar. 1908, pp. 821-825. |
| Lumsdaine et al., “Full Resolution Lightfield Rendering” Adobe Technical Report Jan. 2008, pp. 1-12. |
| Maeda, Y. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with Pseudorandom Pixel Placement for Clear Imaging,” 2009 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Dec. 2009. |
| Magnor, M. et al., “Model-Aided Coding of Multi-Viewpoint Image Data,” Proceedings IEEE Conference on Image Processing, ICIP-2000, Vancouver, Canada, Sep. 2000. https://graphics.tu-bs.de/static/people/magnor/publications/icip00.pdf. |
| Mallat, Stephane, “A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing”, Academic Press 1998. |
| Malzbender, et al., “Polynomial Texture Maps”, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2001. |
| Marshall, Richard J. et al., “Improving Depth Estimation from a Plenoptic Camera by Patterned Illumination,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9528, 2015, pp. 1-6. |
| Masselus, Vincent, et al., “Relighting with 4D Incident Light Fields”, SIGGRAPH 2003. |
| Meynants, G., et al., “Pixel Binning in CMOS Image Sensors,” Frontiers in Electronic Imaging Conference, 2009. |
| Moreno-Noguer, F. et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Aug. 2007; pp. 1-9. |
| Munkberg, J. et al., “Layered Reconstruction for Defocus and Motion Blur” EGSR 2014, pp. 1-12. |
| Naemura et al., “3-D Computer Graphics based on Integral Photography” Optics Express, Feb. 12, 2001. vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 255-262. |
| Nakamura, J., “Image Sensors and Signal Processing for Digital Still Cameras” (Optical Science and Engineering), 2005. |
| National Instruments, “Anatomy of a Camera,” pp. 1-5, Sep. 6, 2006. |
| Nayar, Shree, et al., “Shape from Focus”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 824-831, Aug. 1994. |
| Ng, R., et al. “Light Field Photography with a Hand-held Plenoptic Camera,” Stanford Technical Report, CSTR 2005-2, 2005. |
| Ng, R., et al., “All-Frequency Shadows Using Non-linear Wavelet Lighting Approximation. ACM Transactions on Graphics,” ACM Transactions on Graphics; Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2003. |
| Ng, R., et al., “Triple Product Wavelet Integrals for All-Frequency Relighting”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004). |
| Ng, Yi-Ren, “Digital Light Field Photography,” Doctoral Thesis, Standford University, Jun. 2006; 203 pages. |
| Ng., R., “Fourier Slice Photography,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 735-744. |
| Nguyen, Hubert. “Practical Post-Process Depth of Field.” GPU Gems 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2008. |
| Nimeroff, J., et al., “Efficient rendering of naturally illuminatied environments” in Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 359-373, 1994. |
| Nokia, “City Lens”, May 2012. |
| Ogden, J., “Pyramid-Based Computer Graphics”, 1985. |
| Okano et al., “Three-dimensional video system based on integral photography” Optical Engineering, Jun. 1999. vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1072-1077. |
| Orzan, Alexandrina, et al., “Diffusion Curves: A Vector Representation for Smooth-Shaded Images,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008; vol. 27; 2008. |
| Pain, B., “Back-Side Illumination Technology for SOI-CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009. |
| Perez, Patrick et al., “Poisson Image Editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003; vol. 22, Issue 3; Jul. 2003; pp. 313-318. |
| Petschnigg, George, et al., “Digial Photography with Flash and No-Flash Image Pairs”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
| Primesense, “The Primesense 3D Awareness Sensor”, 2007. |
| Ramamoorthi, R., et al, “Frequency space environment map rendering” ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2002 proceedings) 21, 3, 517-526. |
| Ramamoorthi, R., et al., “An efficient representation for irradiance environment maps”, in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 497-500. |
| Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Glare Aware Photography: 4D Ray Sampling for Reducing Glare Effects of Camera Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, Aug. 2008; vol. 27, Issue 3; pp. 1-10. |
| Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-Flash Imaging”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
| Raytrix, “Raytrix Lightfield Camera,” Raytrix GmbH, Germany 2012, pp. 1-35. |
| Roper Scientific, Germany “Fiber Optics,” 2012. |
| Scharstein, Daniel, et al., “High-Accuracy Stereo Depth Maps Using Structured Light,” CVPR'03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society, pp. 195-202. |
| Schirmacher, H. et al., “High-Quality Interactive Lumigraph Rendering Through Warping,” May 2000, Graphics Interface 2000. |
| Shade, Jonathan, et al., “Layered Depth Images”, SIGGRAPH 98, pp. 1-2. |
| Shreiner, OpenGL Programming Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 8, 2010. |
| Simpleviewer, “Tiltview”, http://simpleviewer.net/tiltviewer. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Skodras, A. et al., “The JPEG 2000 Still Image Compression Standard,” Sep. 2001, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 36-58. |
| Sloan, P., et al., “Precomputed radiance transfer for real-time rendering in dynamic, low-frequency lighting environments”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 527-536, 2002. |
| Snavely, Noah, et al., “Photo-tourism: Exploring Photo collections in 3D”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings), 2006. |
| Sokolov, “Autostereoscopy and Integral Photography by Professor Lippmann's Method” , 1911, pp. 23-29. |
| Sony Corp, “Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera Handbook”, 2011. |
| Sony, Sony's First Curved Sensor Photo: http://www.engadget.com; Jul. 2014. |
| Stensvold, M., “Hybrid AF: A New Approach to Autofocus Is Emerging for both Still and Video”, Digital Photo Magazine, Nov. 13, 2012. |
| Story, D., “The Future of Photography”, Optics Electronics, Oct. 2008. |
| Sun, Jian, et al., “Stereo Matching Using Belief Propagation”, 2002. |
| Tagging photos on Flickr, Facebook and other online photo sharing sites (see, for example, http://support.gnip.com/customer/portal/articles/809309-flickr-geo-photos-tag-search). Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Takahashi, Keita, et al., “All in-focus View Synthesis from Under-Sampled Light Fields”, ICAT 2003, Tokyo, Japan. |
| Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification” Applied Optics 40, 11 (Apr. 10, 2001), pp. 1806-1813. |
| Tao, Michael, et al., “Depth from Combining Defocus and Correspondence Using Light-Field Cameras”, Dec. 2013. |
| Techcrunch, “Coolinis”, Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Teo, P., et al., “Efficient linear rendering for interactive light design”, Tech. Rep. STAN-CS-TN-97-60, 1998, Stanford University. |
| Teranishi, N. “Evolution of Optical Structure in Images Sensors,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2012 IEEE International; Dec. 10-13, 2012. |
| Vaish et al., “Using plane + parallax for calibrating dense camera arrays”, In Proceedings CVPR 2004, pp. 2-9. |
| Vaish, V., et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform,” Workshop on Advanced 3D Imaging for Safety and Security (in conjunction with CVPR 2005), 2005. |
| VR Playhouse, “The Surrogate,” http://www.vrplayhouse.com/the-surrogate. |
| Wanner, S. et al., “Globally Consistent Depth Labeling of 4D Light Fields,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012. |
| Wanner, S. et al., “Variational Light Field Analysis for Disparity Estimation and Super-Resolution,” IEEE Transacations on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellegence, 2013. |
| Wenger, et al, “Performance Relighting and Reflectance Transformation with Time-Multiplexed Illumination”, Institute for Creative Technologies, SIGGRAPH 2005. |
| Wetzstein, Gordon, et al., “Sensor Saturation in Fourier Multiplexed Imaging”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2010). |
| Wikipedia—Adaptive Optics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/adaptive_optics. Retrieved Feb. 2014. |
| Wikipedia—Autofocus systems and methods: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Bayer Filter: http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013. |
| Wikipedia—Color Image Pipeline: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/color_image_pipeline. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014. |
| Wikipedia—Compression standard JPEG XR: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
| Wikipedia—CYGM Filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYGM_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013. |
| Meng, J. et al., “An Approach on Hardware Design for Computational Photography Applications Based on Light Field Refocusing Algorithm,” Nov. 18, 2007, 12 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180329485 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15590841 | May 2017 | US |
| Child | 15897994 | US |
