The present invention relates to telecommunications and, more particularly, to mobile telecommunications terminals and utilization of network services.
Multimode terminals are getting more and more popular. Multimode terminals are capable of operating on different system modes (using different radio access technologies and/or able to attach to different core networks). Examples of different system modes are GERAN, WCDMA, TDMA, AMPS, CDMA 2000, WLAN, Bluetooth etc. Multimode networks may support different types of interworking between the system modes supported by the terminal.
Currently the terminal already provides some information about its capability in different system modes, making the network aware which services the terminal can support in different system modes. An example is a GERAN terminal indicating its capabilities; in addition to the capabilities for GERAN access technology, also if it supports WCDMA and/or CDMA 2000 radio access technologies. The terminal may have quite different support for services depending on the serving system mode. For example, simultaneous packet and circuit switched service is only possible if both the GERAN network and terminal support dual transfer mode (DTM) while this service is always supported by a GERAN/UTRAN dual mode terminal when served by UTRAN. Similarly, if the GERAN network does not support high speed data, then the circuit switched data rate is limited to 9.6 kbit/s for GERAN access while a higher data rate is likely available through WCDMA and an even higher data rate through WLAN.GERAN again might support a location service when any of the other modes supported by the multimode terminal do not support this service. However, when the terminal requests a service, the request is limited to the services supported by the terminal in the currently serving system mode, additional restrictions may be set if the network indicates non-support for some specific network capabilities.
In 3GPP standardisation, different vendors are proposing different ways to solve specific problems where GERAN capabilities are not enough to support a service and thus inter-system change from GERAN to UTRAN is proposed. For example, 3GPP TSG-SA WG1 #21 (Sophia Antipolis, France Jun. 7-11, 2003) proposes to allow a UE that has CS multimedia capability and that is camping on a GERAN cell but is also within UTRAN coverage to setup a CS multimedia service using a UDI 64 kbit/s bearer in UTRAN. Another example is 3GPP TSG-SA2 #33 (also Jun. 7-11, 2003) which introduces a proposal for a new procedure for dual CN connection where a UMTS/GSM terminal roaming in GSM in the neighbourhood of UTRAN coverage is allowed to request a dual CN connection to the BSS, even if the MS is not Class A or if DTM is not supported by the MS and/or the BSS, in order to indicate that a handover or a cell change order to UTRAN should be favoured by the BSS.
Currently there already exist other similar problem cases for other services as well, and the above mentioned proposed solutions by different vendors are not applicable for solving the problems for these other cases but are only directed to narrow and particular problems. The difficulty in these solutions is that they are targeted to a specific problem and are not suitable for solving the issue in generic way (though, these proposals are not actually acceptable to solve the mentioned problems). In this invention disclosure it is shown that a generic mechanism should be applied into the 3GPP specifications to solve the problem in a generic way.
A further example solution is given in the EPO patent No 0716797B1 where the mobile station utilises service specific PLMN preference lists and where the mobile station then selects the PLMN according to the corresponding preference list for the service requested by the user.
Still another example is given in the Finnish patent FI 105309B where the mobile station is aware of the different services supported by different available PLMNs and where the mobile stations selects the PLMN according to the requested service.
Still another example is given in the US patent application 2003/0114158A1 where terminal either directly or indirectly requests intersystem handover in order to establish the requested service. In this patent the preference list in either terminal or network is needed in order to tie the specific service to the specific system.
The disadvantage of these solutions is that the mobile station awareness of the services available from different PLMNs cannot be easily arranged. Also the support of services by different PLMNs may not only depend on the capabilities of the PLMN but also e.g. on the load of the networks and then the support of a specific service may be time dependent. Also the service availability may be location dependent e.g. as a function of the capabilities of the serving cell. Also the disadvantage is the need to have service/content based preference lists either in terminal or in network. Furthermore the optimum PLMN cannot be selected for mobile terminated services in which case the mobile station would not be aware of the service in advance and then cannot select the appropriate PLMN in advance and the service request would be rejected already by the PLMN where the mobile station is attached at the time of the service establishment attempt. Hence the prior art does not provide a solution for a fully flexible service request in respect to the terminal and the network capabilities in different modes.
The generic problem solved is the generic case where a multimode terminal is served by one system and the terminal supports a service that is not supported by the serving system, but likely would be supported by another system (supported by the multimode terminal with the other system's coverage available). For example, currently a GERAN/UTRAN dual mode terminal cannot request a specific service that it supports only in the UTRAN mode, when it is served by a GERAN network.
The invention is that a generic service request signalling is defined where a multimode terminal is allowed to request any service that it supports in any of the modes (e.g., access technology like GERAN I UTRAN I CDMA2000 I BlueTooth/WLAN/ . . . ) supported by the terminal. The network may then decide to move the terminal to other system if possible and necessary in order to establish the service. The terminal capability indication for each system mode mostly exists already.
It should be mentioned that it would be advantageous for the network to indicate support for the generic service request signaling so that terminal would not send these requests in case the serving network would not support it.
The advantages of the invention are that terminal could start the service regardless the serving system capabilities and the full control is left to the network.
The terminal would not need to scan the available modes and reselect the system that supports requested service.
1. Making service request independent from the serving system mode Since a multimode terminal may support a wide range of services where some specific services are not supported by the mobile in all system modes and some specific services may not be requested from the serving system, it is possible that the terminal (user) does not reach the service it would be able to support, and a service that would be available at the current terminal location through other system modes.
This problem can be solved by a generic service request procedure that allows the terminal to request any of the services it supports, in any of the system modes it supports, through the current serving system.
This generic service request can be implemented in several different ways. Normally the network should indicate support for generic service requests in order to avoid compatibility problems for new terminals in legacy networks. In case a generic service request is allowed the terminal may:
2. Network control for system mode reselection when required to serve any specific service
Several proposals have been made to allow the terminal to select the serving system according to the service the terminal (user) is requesting at each moment. A terminal based system mode selection has several serious disadvantages. Examples of the disadvantages are that:
Clearly it is strongly preferable that the terminal operates on the system where a multimode network has put the terminal with different network and cell reselection parameters.
The terminal should continue signalling through the serving system as normally and the control for system selection should be left for the multimode network. The solution to maintain full control at the multimode network while still making it possible for the terminal to be served with a service it wants and which it only supports on a non-serving system mode, or that is only supported by a non-serving system, can be reached by a generic service request procedure that allows the terminal to request a service that it supports under any of the supported system modes and generic service request can be sent to the serving network, at least if indicated being allowed by the serving network.
Figure lis an example of a possible multimode system; this invention is not limited to this example case only. The multimode terminal supports all the access networks but is attached to one of the access networks based on cell selection criteria. Different access networks may have different set of services supported as well as the multimode terminal may support different set of services which may not be aligned witll supported services in the access networks. For example possible access networks could be GSM/EDGE, WCDMA, CDMA2000, WLAN, BT, etc.
The flow diagram of
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/563,545 filed on Feb. 15, 2007, which was the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/FI2004/000427 filed Jul. 6, 2004, this application claims the benefit to Provisional Application No. 60/485,609, filed Jul. 7, 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60485609 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10563545 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 15711042 | US |