Genes regulated by DNA methylation in colon tumors

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The present invention relates to a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs which are differentially expressed by DNA demethylation in colon tumor cells and which may be used entirely or in part to diagnose, to stage, to treat, or to monitor the progression or treatment of disorders such as cancer.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] DNA methylation is an epigenetic process that alters gene expression in mammalian cells. Methylation of cytosine residues occurs at specific 5′-CG-3′ dinucleotide base pairs during DNA replication. A high density of CG dinucleotides, termed CpG islands (CGI), are found near the promoters of approximately 60% of human genes. Methylation of CGI is usually associated with decreased gene expression (methylation silencing), presumably by interfering with transcription factor binding at the promoter. The compound 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (Aza) is an irreversible inhibitor of DNA methytransferase that has been commonly used to demethylate DNA and restore expression of methylation silenced genes. Methylation of many genes occurs normally during development as part of X chromosome inactivation and genomic imprinting, and a progressive increase in gene methylation is associated with aging.

[0004] Abnormal DNA methylation including global hypomethylation and regional hypermethylation is a common feature of human neoplasms and has recently been identified as an important pathway in tumor progression. A cancer specific methylation pattern, termed “CpG island methyation phenotype” (CIMP) has been described in a distinct subset of colorectal primary tumors and cell lines. CIMP is distinct from the pattern of gene methylation seen in association with aging in non-tumorous colorectal tissues (Toyota et al. 2000; Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:710-715). Recently, hypermethylation has emerged as a significant mechanism of tumor suppressor gene inactivation in cancer. For example, methylation silencing of a key mismatch repair enzyme, hMLHl, has been implicated as a cause of microsatellite instability (MSI), a form of genetic instability commonly seen in colorectal cancer (CRC; Herman et al. (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:6870-6875). Other tumor suppressor genes shown to be targets of methylation silencing in cancer include p16INK4a, VHL, BRCA1, TIMP-3, ER, and E-cadherin (Baylin and Herman (2000) Trends Genet 16:168-174).

[0005] Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States with approximately 130,000 new cases and 55,000 deaths per year. CRC progresses slowly from benign adenomatous polyps to invasive metastatic carcinomas. As with other cancer types, tumor progression involves various forms of genomic instability such as chromosome loss and deletions, MSI, and mutations in key tumor suppressor genes and proto-oncogenes. For example, approximately 85% of all CRC cases involve an inactivating mutation in the tumor suppressor gene APC which is the earliest known genetic event leading to tumor initiation. During tumor progression, most CRCs acquire additional mutations in other tumor suppressors and proto-oncogenes, including K-ras, p53, DCC, TGFbRII, and BAX. The vast majority of CRCs are sporadic. However, two genetic syndromes that involve a high predisposition to CRC include familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis coli (HNPCC). FAP is caused by germline inheritance of an inactivating mutation in APC that leads to a very high frequency of polyp formation, some of which progress to malignant carcinoma. HNPCC is associated with a germline mutation in at least one of the DNA mismatch repair enzymes, hMLH1 or hMSH2.

[0006] In the APC deficicient “MIN” mouse model of colorectal cancer, Aza treatment in combination with a genetic reduction in DNA methyltransferase I activity leads to reduced polyp formation. This reduced polyp formation suggests that methylation silencing may play a significant role in polyp formation in colorectal cancer and that Aza treatment may be beneficial (Laird et al. (1995) Cell 81:197-205). Using a combination of microarray experiments and other methods, Karpf et al. (1999; Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:14007-14012) showed that treatment with Aza of cultured HT-29 cells, a colorectal cancer cell line, leads to specific expression of several genes related to interferon (IFN) signaling. In addition, Aza treatment inhibits growth of HT-29 cells in culture and this inhibition parallels induction of IFN responsive genes, consistent with the known growth inhibitory function of IFN (Karpf, supra). Thus, activation of methylation silenced genes such as those associated with IFN signaling may improve growth control in tumor cells.

[0007] Array technology can provide a simple way to explore the expression of a single polymorphic gene or the expression profile of a large number of related or unrelated genes. When the expression of a single gene is examined, arrays are employed to detect the expression of a specific gene or its variants. When an expression profile is examined, arrays provide a platform for examining which genes are tissue specific, carrying out housekeeping functions, parts of a signaling cascade, or specifically related to a particular genetic predisposition, condition, disease, or disorder. The potential application of gene expression profiling is particularly relevant to improving diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of disease. For example, both the levels and sequences expressed in tissues from subjects with colon cancer may be compared with the levels and sequences expressed in normal tissue.

[0008] The present invention provides for a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs for use in detecting changes in expression of genes encoding proteins that are associated with DNA methylation. The present invention satisfies a need in the art by providing a combination of cDNAs that represent a set of differentially expressed genes which may be used entirely or in part to diagnose, to stage, to treat, or to monitor the progression or treatment of a subject with a disorder such as colorectal cancer.

SUMMARY

[0009] The present invention provides a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs:1-61 as presented in the Sequence Listing and the complements thereof, which may be used to diagnose, to stage, to treat, or to monitor the progression or treatment of a disorder or process associated with DNA methylation. The invention also provides a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein in the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs:1-3,5-16, 18, 19, 21-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 37-39, 41-43, 45-51, 53, 55-58, 60, and 61 that are differentially expressed by DNA methylation in colon tumor cells and the complements of SEQ ID NOs:1-3,5-16, 18, 19, 21-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 37-39, 41-43, 45-51, 53, 55-58, 60, and 61. The invention additionally provides a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein in the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs 1-3,5-16, 18, 19, 21-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 37-39, and 41 that are differentially expressed in colon tumor cells treated with Aza and the complements of SEQ ID NO:1-3,5-16, 18, 19, 21-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 37-39, and 41. The invention further provides a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein in the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs:42, 43, and 4548 that are differentially expressed in colon tumor cells expressing a DNMT antisense construct and the complements of SEQ ID NOs:42, 43, and 45-48. The invention still further provides a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein in the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs:49-51, 53, 55-58, 60, and 61 that are upregulated in colon tumor cells treated with Aza and downregulated in colon tumor cells relative to normal colon and the complements of SEQ ID NOs:49-51, 53, 55-58, 60, and 61. In one aspect, the combination is useful to stage or to monitor treatment of a neoplastic disorder such as colorectal cancer. In another aspect, the combination is immobilized on a substrate.

[0010] The invention also provides a high throughput method to detect differential expression of one or more of the cDNAs of the combination. The method comprises hybridizing the substrate comprising the combination with the nucleic acids of a sample, thereby forming one or more hybridization complexes, detecting the hybridization complexes, and comparing the hybridization complexes with those of a standard, wherein differences in the size and signal intensity of each hybridization complex indicates differential expression of nucleic acids in the sample. In one aspect, the sample is from a subject with cancer and differential expression determines an early, mid, and late stage of the disorder.

[0011] The invention further provides a high throughput method of screening a library or a plurality of molecules or compounds to identify a ligand. The method comprises combining the substrate comprising the combination with a library or a plurality of molecules or compounds under conditions to allow specific binding and detecting specific binding, thereby identifying a ligand. The library or plurality of molecules or compounds are selected from DNA molecules, enhancers, mimetics, peptide nucleic acids, proteins, repressors, regulatory proteins, RNA molecules, and transcription factors. The invention additionally provides a method for purifying a ligand, the method comprising combining a cDNA of the invention with a sample under conditions which allow specific binding, recovering the bound cDNA, and separating the cDNA from the ligand, thereby obtaining purified ligand.

[0012] The invention still further provides an isolated cDNA selected from SEQ ID NOs:1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25, 26, 33, 45, 46, 47, 58, 60, and 61 as presented in the Sequence Listing. The invention also provides a vector comprising the cDNA, a host cell comprising the vector, and a method for producing a protein comprising culturing the host cell under conditions for the expression of a protein and recovering the protein from the host cell culture.

[0013] The present invention provides a purified protein encoded and produced by a cDNA of the invention. The invention also provides a high-throughput method for using a protein to screen a library or a plurality of molecules or compounds to identify a ligand. The method comprises combining the protein or a portion thereof with the library or plurality of molecules or compounds under conditions to allow specific binding and detecting specific binding, thereby identifying a ligand which specifically binds the protein. The library or plurality of molecules or compounds is selected from agonists, antagonists, antibodies, DNA molecules, small molecule drugs, immunoglobulins, inhibitors, mimetics, peptide nucleic acids, peptides, pharmaceutical agents, proteins, RNA molecules, and ribozymes. The invention further provides a method for using a protein to purify a ligand. The method comprises combining the protein or a portion thereof with a sample under conditions to allow specific binding, recovering the bound protein, and separating the protein from the ligand, thereby obtaining purified ligand. The invention still further provides a method for using the protein to produce an antibody. The method comprises immunizing an animal with the protein or an antigenic determinant thereof under conditions to elicit an antibody response, isolating animal antibodies, and screening the isolated antibodies with the protein to identify an antibody which specifically binds the protein. The invention yet still further provides a method for using the protein to purify antibodies which bind specifically to the protein.

[0014] The invention provides a purified antibody. The invention also provides a method of using an antibody to detect the expression of a protein in a sample, the method comprising contacting the antibody with a sample under conditions for the formation of an antibody:protein complex and detecting complex formation wherein the formation of the complex indicates the expression of the protein in the sample. In one aspect, complex formation is compared to standards and is diagnostic of colon cancer. The invention further provides using an antibody to immunopurify a protein comprising combining the antibody with a sample under conditions to allow formation of an antibody:protein complex, and separating the antibody from the protein, thereby obtaining purified protein.

[0015] The invention still further provides a composition comprising a cDNA, a protein, an antibody, or a ligand which has agonistic or antagonistic activity.

DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCE LISTING AND TABLES

[0016] A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.

[0017] The Sequence Listing is a compilation of cDNAs obtained by sequencing and extending clone inserts. Each sequence is identified by a sequence identification number (SEQ ID NO) and by a template identification number (Incyte ID).

[0018] Table 1 shows the differential expression of the cDNAs of the present invention by DNA methylation in colon tumor cells. Column 1 shows the Clone ID for each clone representing a cDNA on a microarray. Column 2 shows the differential expression of HT29 cells treated with Aza for 5 days (HT29 t/Aza (5d)) relative to untreated cells; and columns 3 and 4 show the differential expression of HT29 cells expressing a DNMT antisense construct for 7 (HT29 t/DNMT antisense (7d)) and 9 (HT29 t/DNMT antisense (9d)) days, respectively, relative to cells transfected with a mutated DNMT antisense construct. Column 5 shows the differential expression of HCT116 cells treated with Aza for 5 days (HCT116 t/Aza (5d)) relative to untreated cells; and columns 6 and 7 show the differential expression of HMEC cells treated with Aza for 4 (HMEC t/Aza (4d)) and 9 (HMEC t/Aza (9d)) days, respectively, relative to untreated cells.

[0019] Table 2 shows the differential expression of clones representing a group of cDNAs of the present invention that are downregulated in colon polyps and colon tumors relative to normal colon tissue. Each column 1 lists the Clone ID for each clone representing a cDNA on a microarray. Columns 2-8 on the top list the differential expression values observed in colon tissue samples from patients with colon polyps (columns 2-6) and colon cancer (columns 7-8). Columns 2-8 on the bottom list the differential expression values observed in colon samples from patients with colon cancer.

[0020] Table 3 shows the region of each cDNA encompassed by the clone present on a microarray and identified as differentially expressed. Columns 1 and 2 show the SEQ ID NO and Template ID, respectively. Column 3 shows the Clone ID and columns 4 and 5 show the first residue (Start) and last residue (Stop) encompassed by the clone on the template.

[0021] Table 4 lists the functional annotation of the cDNAs of the present invention. Columns 1 and 2 show the SEQ ID NO and Template ID, respectively. Columns 3, 4, and 5 show the GenBank hit (GenBank ID), probability score (E-value), and functional annotation, respectively, as determined by BLAST analysis (version 2.0 using default parameters; Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389-3402; Altschul (1993) J Mol Evol 36: 290-300; and Altschul et al. (1990) J Mol Biol 215:403410) of the cDNA against GenBank (release 121; National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda Md.).

[0022] Table 5 shows Pfam (Bateman et al. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res 28:263-266) annotations of the cDNAs of the present invention. Columns 1 and 2 show the SEQ ID NO and Template ID, respectively. Columns 3, 4, and 5 show the first residue (Start), last residue (Stop), and reading frame, respectively, for the segment of the cDNA identified by Pfam analysis. Columns 6, 7, and 8 show the Pfam ID, Pfam description, and E-value, respectively, corresponding to the polypeptide domain encoded by the cDNA segment.

[0023]
FIG. 1 shows western blots of DNMT1 expression. (A) Expression of DNMT1 in HT29 and HCT116 cells treated with Aza. (B) Expression of DNMT1 in HT29 cells expressing a DNMT1 antisense construct.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0024] Definitions

[0025] “Antibody” refers to intact immunoglobulin molecule, a polyclonal antibody, a monoclonal antibody, a chimeric antibody, a recombinant antibody, a humanized antibody, single chain antibodies, a Fab fragment, an F(ab′)2 fragment, an Fv fragment; and an antibody-peptide fusion protein.

[0026] “Antigenic determinant” refers to an antigenic or immunogenic epitope, structural feature, or region of an oligopeptide, peptide, or protein which is capable of inducing formation of an antibody which specifically binds the protein. Biological activity is not a prerequisite for immunogenicity.

[0027] “Array” refers to an ordered arrangement of at least two cDNAs, proteins, or antibodies on a substrate. At least one of the cDNAs, proteins, or antibodies represents a control or standard, and the other cDNA, protein, or antibody of diagnostic or therapeutic interest. The arrangement of at least two and up to about 40,000 cDNAs, proteins, or antibodies on the substrate assures that the size and signal intensity of each labeled complex, formed between each cDNA and at least one nucleic acid, each protein and at least one ligand or antibody, or each antibody and at least one protein to which the antibody specifically binds, is individually distinguishable.

[0028] A “combination” comprises at least two and up to 132 sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-61 as presented in the Sequence Listing.

[0029] “cDNA” refers to an isolated polynucleotide, nucleic acid, or a fragment thereof, that contains from about 400 to about 12,000 nucleotides. It may have originated recombinantly or synthetically, may be double-stranded or single-stranded, represents coding and noncoding 3′ or 5′ sequence, and generally lacks introns.

[0030] The phrase “cDNA encoding a protein” refers to a nucleic acid sequence that closely aligns with sequences which encode conserved regions, motifs or domains that were identified by employing analyses well known in the art. These analyses include BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; Altschul, supra; Altschul et al., supra) which provides identity within the conserved region. Thirty percent identity is a reliable threshold for sequence alignments of at least 150 residues (Brenner et al. (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:6073-6078) and 40% is a reasonable threshold for alignments of at least 70 residues (Brenner, page 6076, column 2).

[0031] The “complement” of a nucleic acid of the Sequence Listing refers to a nucleotide sequence which is completely complementary over the full length of the sequence and which will hybridize under conditions of high stringency.

[0032] A “composition” refers to the polynucleotide and a labeling moiety; a purified protein and a pharmaceutical carrier or a heterologous, labeling or purification moiety; an antibody and a labeling moiety or pharmaceutical agent; and the like.

[0033] “Derivative” refers to a cDNA or a protein that has been subjected to a chemical modification. Derivatization of a cDNA can involve substitution of a nontraditional base such as queosine or of an analog such as hypoxanthine. These substitutions are well known in the art. Derivatization of a protein involves the replacement of a hydrogen by an acetyl, acyl, alkyl, amino, formyl, or morpholino group. Derivative molecules retain the biological activities of the naturally occurring molecules but may confer longer lifespan or enhanced activity.

[0034] “Differential expression” refers to an increased or upregulated or a decreased or downregulated expression as detected by absence, presence, or at least two-fold change in the amount of transcribed messenger RNA or translated protein in a sample.

[0035] “Disorder” refers to conditions, diseases or syndromes associated with DNA methylation including neoplastic disorders such as adenocarcinoma, leukemia, lymphoma, melanoma, myeloma, sarcoma, teratocarcinoma, and, in particular, cancers of the adrenal gland, bladder, bone, bone marrow, brain, breast, cervix, gall bladder, ganglia, gastrointestinal tract, heart, kidney, liver, lung, muscle, ovary, pancreas, parathyroid, penis, prostate, salivary glands, skin, spleen, testis, thymus, thyroid, and uterus; and precancerous disorders such as premalignant polyps.

[0036] An “expression profile” is a representation of gene expression in a sample. A nucleic acid expression profile is produced using sequencing, hybridization, or amplification technologies and mRNAs or cDNAs from a sample. A protein expression profile, although time delayed, mirrors the nucleic acid expression profile and uses PAGE, ELISA, FACS, or arrays and labeling moieties or antibodies to detect expression in a sample. The nucleic acids, proteins, or antibodies may be used in solution or attached to a substrate, and their detection is based on methods and labeling moieties well known in the art.

[0037] “Fragment” refers to a chain of consecutive nucleotides from about 60 to about 5000 base pairs in length. Fragments may be used in PCR, hybridization or array technologies to identify related nucleic acids and in binding assays to screen for a ligand. Such ligands are useful as therapeutics to regulate replication, transcription or translation.

[0038] A “hybridization complex” is formed between a cDNA and a nucleic acid of a sample when the purines of one molecule hydrogen bond with the pyrimidines of the complementary molecule, e.g., 5′-A-G-T—C-3′ base pairs with 3′-T—C—A-G-5′. The degree of complementarity and the use of nucleotide analogs affect the efficiency and stringency of hybridization reactions.

[0039] “Identity” as applied to sequences, refers to the quantification (usually percentage) of nucleotide or residue matches between at least two sequences aligned using a standardized algorithm such as Smith-Waterman alignment (Smith and Waterman (1981) J Mol Biol 147:195-197), CLUSTALW (Thompson et al. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-4680), or BLAST2 (Altschul et al. (1997) supra). BLAST2 may be used in a standardized and reproducible way to insert gaps in one of the sequences in order to optimize alignment and to achieve a more meaningful comparison between them. “Similarity” as applied to proteins uses the same algorithms but takes into account conservative substitutions of nucleotides or residues.

[0040] “Isolated” or “purified” refers to any molecule or compound that is separated from its natural environment and is from about 60% free to about 90% free from other components with which it is naturally associated.

[0041] “Labeling moiety” refers to any reporter molecule whether a visible or radioactive label, stain or dye that can be attached to or incorporated into a cDNA or protein. Visible labels and dyes include but are not limited to anthocyanins, β glucuronidase, BIODIPY, Coomassie blue, Cy3 and CyS, digoxigenin, FITC, green fluorescent protein (GFP), luciferase, spyro red, silver, and the like. Radioactive markers include radioactive forms of hydrogen, iodine, phosphorous, sulfur, and the like.

[0042] “Ligand” refers to any agent, molecule, or compound which will bind specifically to a complementary site on a cDNA molecule or polynucleotide, or to an epitope of a protein. Such ligands stabilize or modulate the activity of polynucleotides or proteins and may be composed of inorganic or organic substances including nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, fats, and lipids.

[0043] “Oligonucleotide” refers a single stranded molecule from about 18 to about 60 nucleotides in length which may be used in hybridization or amplification technologies or in regulation of replication, transcription or translation. Equivalent terms are amplimer, primer, and oligomer.

[0044] “Portion” refers to any part of a protein used for any purpose which retains at least one biological or antigenic characteristic of a native protein, but especially, to an epitope for the screening of ligands or for the production of antibodies.

[0045] “Post-translational modification” of a protein can involve lipidation, glycosylation, phosphorylation, acetylation, racemization, proteolytic cleavage, and the like. These processes may occur synthetically or biochemically. Biochemical modifications will vary by cellular location, cell type, pH, enzymatic milieu, and the like.

[0046] “Probe” refers to a cDNA that hybridizes to at least one nucleic acid in a sample. Where targets are single stranded, probes are complementary single strands. Probes can be labeled for use in hybridization reactions including Southern, northern, in situ, dot blot, array, and like technologies or in screening assays.

[0047] “Protein” refers to a polypeptide or any portion thereof. An “oligopeptide” is an amino acid sequence from about five residues to about 15 residues that is used as part of a fusion protein to produce an antibody.

[0048] “Sample” is used in its broadest sense as containing nucleic acids, proteins, antibodies, and the like. A sample may comprise a bodily fluid; the soluble fraction of a cell preparation, or an aliquot of media in which cells were grown; a chromosome, an organelle, or membrane isolated or extracted from a cell; genomic DNA, RNA, or cDNA in solution or bound to a substrate; a cell; a tissue; a tissue print; buccal cells, skin, a hair or its follicle; and the like.

[0049] “Specific binding” refers to a special and precise interaction between two molecules which is dependent upon their structure, particularly their molecular side groups. For example, the intercalation of a regulatory protein into the major groove of a DNA molecule, the hydrogen bonding along the backbone between two single stranded nucleic acids, or the binding between an epitope of a protein and an agonist, antagonist, or antibody.

[0050] “Substrate” refers to any rigid or semi-rigid support to which cDNAs or proteins are bound and includes membranes, filters, chips, slides, wafers, fibers, magnetic or nonmagnetic beads, gels, capillaries or other tubing, plates, polymers, and microparticles with a variety of surface forms including wells, trenches, pins, channels and pores.

[0051] A “transcript image” (TI) is a profile of gene transcription activity in a particular tissue at a particular time. TI provides assessment of the relative abundance of expressed polynucleotides in the cDNA libraries of an EST database as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,484, incorporated herein by reference.

[0052] “Variant” refers to molecules that are recognized variations of a cDNA or a protein encoded by the cDNA. Splice variants may be determined by BLAST score, wherein the score is at least 100, and most preferably at least 400. Allelic variants have a high percent identity to the cDNAs and may differ by about three bases per hundred bases. “Single nucleotide polymorphism” (SNP) refers to a change in a single base as a result of a substitution, insertion or deletion. The change may be conservative (purine for purine) or non-conservative (purine to pyrimidine) and may or may not result in a change in an encoded amino acid.

[0053] The Invention

[0054] The present invention provides for a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs:1-61 and the complements thereof which may be used to diagnose, to stage, to treat, or to monitor the progression or treatment of a disorder or process associated with DNA methylation. The cDNAs represent known and novel genes differentially expressed by DNA methylation in colorectal carcinoma cells. The invention also provides a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs:1-3,5-16, 18, 19, 21-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 37-39, 4143, 45-51, 53, 55-58, 60, and 61 and the complements thereof that are differentially expressed by DNA methylation in colon tumor cells; a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein in the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs 1-3,5-16, 18, 19, 21-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 37-39, and 41 that are differentially expressed in colon tumor cells treated with Aza and the complements of SEQ ID NO:1-3,5-16, 18, 19, 21-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 37-39, and 41; a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein in the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs:42, 43, and 45-48 that are differentially expressed in colon tumor cells expressing a DNMT antisense construct and the complements of SEQ ID NOs:42, 43, and 45-48; and a combination comprising a plurality of cDNAs wherein in the cDNAs are SEQ ID NOs:49-51, 53, 55-58, 60, and 61 that are upregulated in colon tumor cells treated with Aza and downregulated in colon tumor cells relative to normal colon and the complements of SEQ ID NOs:49-51, 53, 55-58, 60, and 61.

[0055] SEQ ID NOs:1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25, 26, 33, 45-47, 58, 60, and 61 represent novel cDNAs associated with DNA methylation. Since the novel cDNAs were identified solely by their differential expression, it is not essential to know a priori the name, structure, or function of the gene or it's encoded protein. The usefulness of the novel cDNAs exists in their immediate value as diagnostics for disorders associated with DNA methylation including colorectal cancer.

[0056] Table 1 lists the differential expression of the cDNAs of the present invention. Column 1 shows the Clone ID for each clone representing a cDNA on a microarray. Column 2 shows the differential expression of HT29 cells treated with Aza for 5 days relative to untreated cells; and columns 3 and 4 show the differential expression of HT29 cells expressing a DNMT antisense construct for 7 and 9 days, respectively, relative to cells transfected with a mutated DNMT antisense construct. Column 5 shows the differential expression of HCT116 cells treated with Aza for 5 days relative to untreated cells; and columns 6 and 7 show the differential expression of HMEC cells treated with Aza for 4 and 9 days, respectively, relative to untreated cells.

[0057] Table 2 shows the differential expression of clones representing a group of cDNAs of the present invention that are downregulated in colon polyps and colon tumors relative to normal colon tissue. Each column 1 lists the Clone ID for each clone representing a cDNA on a microarray. Columns 2-8 on the top list the differential expression values observed in colon tissue samples from patients with colon polyps (columns 2-6) and colon cancer (columns 7-8). Columns 2-8 on the bottom list the differential expression values observed in colon samples from patients with colon cancer.

[0058] Table 3 shows the region of each cDNA encompassed by the clone present on a microarray and identified as differentially expressed. Columns 1 and 2 show the SEQ ID NO and Template ID, respectively. Column 3 shows the Clone ID and columns 4 and 5 show the first residue (Start) and last residue (Stop) encompassed by the clone on the template.

[0059] Table 4 lists the functional annotation of the cDNAs of the present invention. Columns 1 and 2 show the SEQ ID NO and Template ID, respectively. Columns 3,4, and 5 show the GenBank hit (GenBank ID), probability score (E-value), and functional annotation, respectively, as determined by BLAST analysis (version 2.0 using default parameters; Altschul (1997) supra; Altschul (1993) J Mol Evol 36: 290-300; and Altschul et al. (1990) J Mol Biol 215:403-410) of the cDNA against GenBank (release 121; National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda Md.).

[0060] Table 5 shows Pfam (Bateman et al., supra) annotations of the cDNAs of the present invention. Pfam is a database of multiple alignments of protein domains or conserved protein regions. The alignments identify structures which have implications for the protein's function. Profile hidden Markov models (profile HMMs) built from the Pfam alignments are useful for automatically recognizing that a new protein belongs to an existing protein family, even if the homology is weak. Columns 1 and 2 show the SEQ ID NO and Template ID, respectively. Columns 3, 4, and 5 show the first residue, last residue, and reading frame, respectively, for the segment of the cDNA identified by Pfam analysis. In some cases the encoded protein was used for Pfam analysis and column 5 reports “PEPT”. Columns 6, 7, and 8 show the Pfam ID, Pfam description, and E-value, respectively, corresponding to the polypeptide domain encoded by the cDNA segment.

[0061] SEQ ID NOs:30, 31, and 35 are melanoma antigen-like (GAGE) proteins. SEQ ID NOs:34, 38 and 41 are melanoma antigen (MAGE) proteins. MAGE and GAGE proteins are expressed in a variety of tumors but not in most normal adult tissues (Van den Eynde et al. (1995) J Exp Med 182:689-698; and Itoh et al. (1996) J Biochem 119:385-390). Demethylation induces expression of MAGE antigens in cells, suggesting MAGE genes are important in developmentally-regulated processes under methylation control (Itoh, supra).

[0062] The cDNAs of the invention define a differential expression pattern against which to compare the expression pattern of biopsied and/or in vitro treated tumor tissue. Experimentally, differential expression of the cDNAs can be evaluated by methods including, but not limited to, differential display by spatial immobilization or by gel electrophoresis, genome mismatch scanning, representational discriminant analysis, clustering, transcript imaging and array technologies. These methods may be used alone or in combination.

[0063] The combination may be arranged on a substrate and hybridized with tissues from subjects with diagnosed neoplasms to identify those sequences which are differentially expressed in tumor versus normal tissue. This allows identification of those sequences of highest diagnostic and potential therapeutic value. In one embodiment, an additional set of cDNAs, such as cDNAs encoding signaling molecules, are arranged on the substrate with the combination. Such combinations may be useful in the elucidation of pathways which are affected in a particular cancer or to identify new, coexpressed, candidate, therapeutic molecules.

[0064] In another embodiment, the combination can be used for large scale genetic or gene expression analysis of a large number of novel, nucleic acids. These samples are prepared by methods well known in the art and are from mammalian cells or tissues which are in a certain stage of development; have been treated with a known molecule or compound, such as a cytokine, growth factor, a drug, and the like; or have been extracted or biopsied from a mammal with a known or unknown condition, disorder, or disease before or after treatment. The sample nucleic acids are hybridized to the combination for the purpose of defining a novel gene profile associated with that developmental stage, treatment, or disorder.

[0065] cDNAs and Their Uses

[0066] cDNAs can be prepared by a variety of synthetic or enzymatic methods well known in the art. cDNAs can be synthesized, in whole or in part, using chemical methods well known in the art (Caruthers et al. (1980) Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (7):215-233). Alternatively, cDNAs can be produced enzymatically or recombinantly, by in vitro or in vivo transcription.

[0067] Nucleotide analogs can be incorporated into cDNAs by methods well known in the art. The only requirement is that the incorporated analog must base pair with native purines or pyrimidines. For example, 2, 6-diaminopurine can substitute for adenine and form stronger bonds with thymidine than those between adenine and thymidine. A weaker pair is formed when hypoxanthine is substituted for guanine and base pairs with cytosine. Additionally, cDNAs can include nucleotides that have been derivatized chemically or enzymatically.

[0068] cDNAs can be synthesized on a substrate. Synthesis on the surface of a substrate may be accomplished using a chemical coupling procedure and a piezoelectric printing apparatus as described by Baldeschweiler et al. (PCT publication WO95/251116). Alternatively, the cDNAs can be synthesized on a substrate surface using a self-addressable electronic device that controls when reagents are added as described by Heller et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,605,662). cDNAs can be synthesized directly on a substrate by sequentially dispensing reagents for their synthesis on the substrate surface or by dispensing preformed DNA fragments to the substrate surface. Typical dispensers include a micropipette delivering solution to the substrate with a robotic system to control the position of the micropipette with respect to the substrate. There can be a multiplicity of dispensers so that reagents can be delivered to the reaction regions efficiently.

[0069] cDNAs can be immobilized on a substrate by covalent means such as by chemical bonding procedures or UV irradiation. In one method, a cDNA is bound to a glass surface which has been modified to contain epoxide or aldehyde groups. In another method, a cDNA is placed on a polylysine coated surface and UV cross-linked to it as described by Shalon et al. (WO95/35505). In yet another method, a cDNA is actively transported from a solution to a given position on a substrate by electrical means (Heller, supra). cDNAs do not have to be directly bound to the substrate, but rather can be bound to the substrate through a linker group. The linker groups are typically about 6 to 50 atoms long to provide exposure of the attached cDNA. Preferred linker groups include ethylene glycol oligomers, diamines, diacids and the like. Reactive groups on the substrate surface react with a terminal group of the linker to bind the linker to the substrate. The other terminus of the linker is then bound to the cDNA. Alternatively, polynucleotides, plasmids or cells can be arranged on a filter. In the latter case, cells are lysed, proteins and cellular components degraded, and the DNA is coupled to the filter by UV cross-linking.

[0070] The cDNAs may be used for a variety of purposes. For example, the combination of the invention may be used on an array. The array, in turn, can be used in high-throughput methods for detecting a related polynucleotide in a sample, screening a plurality of molecules or compounds to identify a ligand, diagnosing a cancer, or inhibiting or inactivating a therapeutically relevant gene related to the cDNA.

[0071] When the cDNAs of the invention are employed on a microarray, the cDNAs are arranged in an ordered fashion so that each cDNA is present at a specified location. Because the cDNAs are at specified locations on the substrate, the hybridization patterns and intensities, which together create a unique expression profile, can be interpreted in terms of expression levels of particular genes and can be correlated with a particular metabolic process, condition, disorder, disease, stage of disease, or treatment.

[0072] Hybridization

[0073] The cDNAs or fragments or complements thereof may be used in various hybridization technologies. The cDNAs may be labeled using a variety of reporter molecules by either PCR, recombinant, or enzymatic techniques. For example, a commercially available vector containing the cDNA is transcribed in the presence of an appropriate polymerase, such as T7 or SP6 polymerase, and at least one labeled nucleotide. Commercial kits are available for labeling and cleanup of such cDNAs. Radioactive (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (APB), Piscataway N.J.), fluorescent (Operon-Qiagen Alameda Calif.), and chemiluminescent labeling (Promega, Madison Wis.) are well known in the art.

[0074] A cDNA may represent the complete coding region of an mRNA or be designed or derived from unique regions of the mRNA or genomic molecule, an intron, a 3′ untranslated region, or from a conserved motif. The cDNA is at least 18 contiguous nucleotides in length and is usually single stranded. Such a cDNA may be used under hybridization conditions that allow binding only to an identical sequence, a naturally occurring molecule encoding the same protein, or an allelic variant. Discovery of related human and mammalian sequences may also be accomplished using a pool of degenerate cDNAs and appropriate hybridization conditions. Generally, a cDNA for use in Southern or northern hybridizations may be from about 400 to about 6000 nucleotides long. Such cDNAs have high binding specificity in solution-based or substrate-based hybridizations. An oligonucleotide, a fragment of the cDNA, may be used to detect a polynucleotide in a sample using PCR.

[0075] The stringency of hybridization is determined by G+C content of the cDNA, salt concentration, and temperature. In particular, stringency is increased by reducing the concentration of salt or raising the hybridization temperature. In solutions used for some membrane based hybridizations, addition of an organic solvent such as formamide allows the reaction to occur at a lower temperature. Hybridization may be performed with buffers, such as 5×saline sodium citrate (SSC) with 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 60° C., that permit the formation of a hybridization complex between nucleic acid sequences that contain some mismatches. Subsequent washes are performed with buffers such as 0.2× SSC with 0.1% SDS at either 45° C. (medium stringency) or 65°-68° C. (high stringency). At high stringency, hybridization complexes will remain stable only where the nucleic acids are completely complementary. In some membrane-based hybridizations, preferably 35% or most preferably 50%, formamide may be added to the hybridization solution to reduce the temperature at which hybridization is performed. Background signals may be reduced by the use of detergents such as Sarkosyl or TRITON X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis Mo.) and a blocking agent such as denatured salmon sperm DNA. Selection of components and conditions for hybridization are well known to those skilled in the art and are reviewed in Ausubel et al. (1997, Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, New York N.Y., Units 2.8-2.11, 3.18-3.19 and 4-6-4.9).

[0076] Dot-blot, slot-blot, low density and high density arrays are prepared and analyzed using methods known in the art. cDNAs from about 18 consecutive nucleotides to about 5000 consecutive nucleotides in length are contemplated by the invention and used in array technologies. The preferred number of cDNAs on an array is at least about 100,000, a more preferred number is at least about 40,000, an even more preferred number is at least about 10,000, and a most preferred number is at least about 600 to about 800. The array may be used to monitor the expression level of large numbers of genes simultaneously and to identify genetic variants, mutations, and SNPs. Such information may be used to determine gene function; to understand the genetic basis of a disorder; to diagnose a disorder; and to develop and monitor the activities of therapeutic agents being used to control or cure a disorder. (See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,796; WO95/11995; WO95/35505; U.S. Pat. No. 5,605,662; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,342.)

[0077] Screening and Purification Assays

[0078] A cDNA may be used to screen a library or a plurality of molecules or compounds for a ligand which specifically binds the cDNA. Ligands may be DNA molecules, enhancers, mimetics, peptide nucleic acids, proteins, repressors, RNA molecules, and transcription factors, and other regulatory proteins that affect replication, transcription, or translation of the polynucleotide in the biological system. The assay involves combining the cDNA or a fragment thereof with the molecules or compounds under conditions that allow specific binding and detecting the bound cDNA to identify at least one ligand that specifically binds the cDNA.

[0079] In one embodiment, the cDNA may be incubated with a library of isolated and purified molecules or compounds and binding activity determined by methods such as a gel-retardation assay (U.S. Pat. No. 6,010,849) or a reticulocyte lysate transcriptional assay. In another embodiment, the cDNA may be incubated with nuclear extracts from biopsied and/or cultured cells and tissues. Specific binding between the cDNA and a molecule or compound in the nuclear extract is initially determined by gel shift assay. Protein binding may be confirmed by raising antibodies against the protein and adding the antibodies to the gel-retardation assay where specific binding will cause a supershift in the assay.

[0080] In another embodiment, the cDNA may be used to purify a molecule or compound using affinity chromatography methods well known in the art. In one embodiment, the cDNA is chemically reacted with cyanogen bromide groups on a polymeric resin or gel. Then a sample is passed over and reacts with or binds to the cDNA. The molecule or compound which is bound to the cDNA may be released from the cDNA by increasing the salt concentration of the flow-through medium and collected.

[0081] The cDNA may be used to purify a ligand from a sample. A method for using a cDNA to purify a ligand would involve combining the cDNA or a fragment thereof with a sample under conditions to allow specific binding, recovering the bound cDNA, and using an appropriate agent to separate the cDNA from the purified ligand.

[0082] Protein Production and Uses

[0083] The full length cDNAs or fragments thereof may be used to produce purified proteins using recombinant DNA technologies described herein and taught in Ausubel (supra; Units 16.1-16.62). One of the advantages of producing proteins by these procedures is the ability to obtain highly-enriched sources of the proteins thereby simplifying purification procedures.

[0084] The proteins may contain amino acid substitutions, deletions or insertions made on the basis of similarity in polarity, charge, solubility, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and/or the amphipathic nature of the residues involved. Such substitutions may be conservative in nature when the substituted residue has structural or chemical properties similar to the original residue (e.g., replacement of leucine with isoleucine or valine) or they may be nonconservative when the replacement residue is radically different (e.g., a glycine replaced by a tryptophan). Computer programs included in LASERGENE software (DNASTAR, Madison Wis.) and algorithms in RasMol software (University of Massachusetts, Amherst Mass.) may be used to help determine which and how many amino acid residues in a particular portion of the protein may be substituted, inserted, or deleted without abolishing biological or immunological activity.

[0085] Expression of Encoded Proteins

[0086] Expression of a particular cDNA may be accomplished by cloning the cDNA into a vector and transforming this vector into a host cell. The cloning vector used for the construction of cDNA libraries in the LIFESEQ databases (Incyte Genomics, Palo Alto Calif.) may also be used for expression. Such vectors usually contain a promoter and a polylinker useful for cloning, priming, and transcription. An exemplary vector may also contain the promoter for β-galactosidase, an amino-terminal methionine and the subsequent seven amino acid residues of β-galactosidase. The vector may be transformed into competent E. coli cells. Induction of the isolated bacterial strain with isopropylthiogalactoside (IPTG) using standard methods will produce a fusion protein that contains an N terminal methionine, the first seven residues of β-galactosidase, about 15 residues of linker, and the protein encoded by the cDNA.

[0087] The cDNA may be shuttled into other vectors known to be useful for expression of protein in specific hosts. Oligonucleotides containing cloning sites and fragments of DNA sufficient to hybridize to stretches at both ends of the cDNA may be chemically synthesized by standard methods. These primers may then be used to amplify the desired fragments by PCR. The fragments may be digested with appropriate restriction enzymes under standard conditions and isolated using gel electrophoresis. Alternatively, similar fragments are produced by digestion of the cDNA with appropriate restriction enzymes and filled in with chemically synthesized oligonucleotides. Fragments of the coding sequence from more than one gene may be ligated together and expressed.

[0088] Signal sequences that dictate secretion of soluble proteins are particularly desirable as component parts of a recombinant sequence. For example, a chimeric protein may be expressed that includes one or more additional purification-facilitating domains. Such domains include, but are not limited to, metal-chelating domains that allow purification on immobilized metals, protein A domains that allow purification on immobilized immunoglobulin, and the domain utilized in the FLAGS extension/affinity purification system (Immunex, Seattle Wash.). The inclusion of a cleavable-linker sequence such as ENTEROKINASEMAX (Invitrogen, San Diego Calif.) between the protein and the purification domain may also be used to recover the protein.

[0089] Suitable host cells may include, but are not limited to, mammalian cells such as Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) and human 293 cells, insect cells such as Sf9 cells, plant cells such as Nicotiana tabacum, yeast cells such as Saccharomvces cerevisiae, and bacteria such as E. coli. For each of these cell systems, a useful vector may also include an origin of replication and one or two selectable markers to allow selection in bacteria as well as in a transformed eukaryotic host. Vectors for use in eukaryotic host cells may require the addition of 3′ poly(A) tail if the cDNA lacks poly(A).

[0090] Additionally, the vector may contain promoters or enhancers that increase gene expression. Many promoters are known and used in the art. Most promoters are host specific and exemplary promoters includes SV40 promoters for CHO cells; T7 promoters for bacterial hosts; viral promoters and enhancers for plant cells; and PGH promoters for yeast. Adenoviral vectors with the rous sarcoma virus enhancer or retroviral vectors with long terminal repeat promoters may be used to drive protein expression in mammalian cell lines. Once homogeneous cultures of recombinant cells are obtained, large quantities of secreted soluble protein may be recovered from the conditioned medium and analyzed using chromatographic methods well known in the art. An alternative method for the production of large amounts of secreted protein involves the transformation of mammalian embryos and the recovery of the recombinant protein from milk produced by transgenic cows, goats, sheep, and the like.

[0091] In addition to recombinant production, proteins or portions thereof may be produced manually, using solid-phase techniques (Stewart et al. (1969) Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis, WH Freeman, San Francisco Calif.; Merrifield (1963) J Am Chem Soc 5:2149-2154), or using machines such as the 431A peptide synthesizer (Applied Biosystems (ABI), Foster City Calif.). Proteins produced by any of the above methods may be used as pharmaceutical compositions to treat disorders associated with null or inadequate expression of the genomic sequence.

[0092] Screening and Purification Assays

[0093] A protein or a portion thereof encoded by the cDNA may be used to screen a library or a plurality of molecules or compounds for a ligand with specific binding affinity or to purify a molecule or compound from a sample. The protein or portion thereof employed in such screening may be free in solution, affixed to an abiotic or biotic substrate, or located intracellularly. For example, viable or fixed prokaryotic host cells that are stably transformed with recombinant nucleic acids that have expressed and positioned a protein on their cell surface can be used in screening assays. The cells are screened against a library or a plurality of ligands and the specificity of binding or formation of complexes between the expressed protein and the ligand may be measured. The ligands may be agonists, antagonists, antibodies, DNA molecules, small molecule drugs, immunoglobulins, inhibitors, mimetics, peptide nucleic acids, peptides, pharmaceutical agents, proteins, RNA molecules, ribozymes, or any other test molecule or compound that specifically binds the protein. An exemplary assay involves combining the mammalian protein or a portion thereof with the molecules or compounds under conditions that allow specific binding and detecting the bound protein to identify at least one ligand that specifically binds the protein.

[0094] This invention also contemplates the use of competitive drug screening assays in which neutralizing antibodies capable of binding the protein specifically compete with a test compound capable of binding to the protein or oligopeptide or fragment thereof. One method for high throughput screening using very small assay volumes and very small amounts of test compound is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,876,946. Molecules or compounds identified by screening may be used in a model system to evaluate their toxicity, diagnostic, or therapeutic potential.

[0095] The protein may be used to purify a ligand from a sample. A method for using a protein to purify a ligand would involve combining the protein or a portion thereof with a sample under conditions to allow specific binding, recovering the bound protein, and using an appropriate chaotropic agent to separate the protein from the purified ligand.

[0096] Production of Antibodies

[0097] A protein encoded by a cDNA of the invention may be used to produce specific antibodies. Antibodies may be produced using an oligopeptide or a portion of the protein with inherent immunological activity. Methods for producing antibodies include: 1) injecting an animal, usually goats, rabbits, or mice, with the protein, or an antigenically-effective portion or an oligopeptide thereof, to induce an immune response; 2) engineering hybridomas to produce monoclonal antibodies; 3) inducing in vivo production in the lymphocyte population; or 4) screening libraries of recombinant immunoglobulins. Recombinant immunoglobulins may be produced as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567.

[0098] Antibodies produced using the proteins of the invention are useful for the diagnosis of prepathologic disorders as well as the diagnosis of chronic or acute diseases characterized by abnormalities in the expression, amount, or distribution of the protein. A variety of protocols for competitive binding or immunoradiometric assays using either polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies specific for proteins are well known in the art. Immunoassays typically involve the formation of complexes between a protein and its specific binding molecule or compound and the measurement of complex formation. Immunoassays may employ a two-site, monoclonal-based assay that utilizes monoclonal antibodies reactive to two noninterfering epitopes on a specific protein or a competitive binding assay (Pound (1998) Immunochemical Protocols, Humana Press, Totowa N.J.).

[0099] Immunoassay procedures may be used to quantify expression of the protein in cell cultures, in subjects with a particular disorder or in model animal systems under various conditions. Increased or decreased production of proteins as monitored by immunoassay may contribute to knowledge of the cellular activities associated with developmental pathways, engineered conditions or diseases, or treatment efficacy. The quantity of a given protein in a given tissue may be determined by performing immunoassays on freeze-thawed detergent extracts of biological samples and comparing the slope of the binding curves to binding curves generated by purified protein.

[0100] Antibody Arrays

[0101] In an alternative to yeast two hybrid system analysis of proteins, an antibody array can be used to study protein-protein interactions and phosphorylation. A variety of protein ligands are immobilized on a membrane using methods well known in the art. The array is incubated in the presence of cell lysate until protein:antibody complexes are formed. Proteins of interest are identified by exposing the membrane to an antibody specific to the protein of interest. In the alternative, a protein of interest is labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) and exposed to the membrane; then the membrane is exposed to anti-DIG antibody which reveals where the protein of interest forms a complex. The identity of the proteins with which the protein of interest interacts is determined by the position of the protein of interest on the membrane.

[0102] Antibody arrays can also be used for high-throughput screening of recombinant antibodies. Bacteria containing antibody genes are robotically-picked and gridded at high density (up to 18,342 different double-spotted clones) on a filter. Up to 15 antigens at a time are used to screen for clones to identify those that express binding antibody fragments. These antibody arrays can also be used to identify proteins which are differentially expressed in samples (de Wildt et al. (2000) Nat Biotechnol 18:989-94).

[0103] Labeling of Molecules for Assay

[0104] A wide variety of reporter molecules and conjugation techniques are known by those skilled in the art and may be used in various cDNA, polynucleotide, protein, peptide or antibody assays. Synthesis of labeled molecules may be achieved using commercial kits for incorporation of a labeled nucleotide such as 32P-dCTP, Cy3-dCTP or Cy5-dCTP or amino acid such as 35S-methionine. Polynucleotides, cDNAs, proteins, or antibodies may be directly labeled with a reporter molecule by chemical conjugation to amines, thiols and other groups present in the molecules using reagents such as BIODIPY or FITC (Molecular Probes, Eugene Oreg.).

[0105] The proteins and antibodies may be labeled for purposes of assay by joining them, either covalently or noncovalently, with a reporter molecule that provides for a detectable signal. A wide variety of labels and conjugation techniques are known and have been reported in the scientific and patent literature including, but not limited to U.S. Pat. No. 3,817,837; U.S. Pat. No. 3,850,752; U.S. Pat. No. 3,939,350; U.S. Pat. No. 3,996,345; U.S. Pat. No. 4,277,437; U.S. Pat. No. 4,275,149; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,366,241.

[0106] Diagnostics

[0107] The cDNAs, or fragments thereof, may be used to detect and quantify differential gene expression; absence, presence, or excess expression of mRNAs; or to monitor mRNA levels during therapeutic intervention. Disorders associated with altered expression include neoplasms such as colorectal cancer. These cDNAs can also be utilized as markers of treatment efficacy against the disorders noted above and other disorders, conditions, and diseases over a period ranging from several days to months. The diagnostic assay may use hybridization or amplification technology to compare gene expression in a biological sample from a patient to standard samples in order to detect altered gene expression. Qualitative or quantitative methods for this comparison are well known in the art.

[0108] For example, the cDNA may be labeled by standard methods and added to a biological sample from a patient under conditions for hybridization complex formation. After an incubation period, the sample is washed and the amount of label (or signal) associated with hybridization complexes is quantified and compared with a standard value. If the amount of label in the patient sample is significantly altered in comparison to the standard value, then the presence of the associated condition, disease or disorder is indicated.

[0109] In order to provide a basis for the diagnosis of a condition, disease or disorder associated with gene expression, a normal or standard expression profile is established. This may be accomplished by combining a biological sample taken from normal subjects, either animal or human, with a probe under conditions for hybridization or amplification. Standard hybridization may be quantified by comparing the values obtained using normal subjects with values from an experiment in which a known amount of a purified target sequence is used. Standard values obtained in this manner may be compared with values obtained from samples from patients who are symptomatic for a particular condition, disease, or disorder. Deviation from standard values toward those associated with a particular condition is used to diagnose that condition.

[0110] Such assays may also be used to evaluate the efficacy of a particular therapeutic treatment regimen in animal studies and in clinical trial or to monitor the treatment of an individual patient. Once the presence of a condition is established and a treatment protocol is initiated, diagnostic assays may be repeated on a regular basis to determine if the level of expression in the patient begins to approximate that which is observed in a normal subject. The results obtained from successive assays may be used to show the efficacy of treatment over a period ranging from several days to months.

[0111] Gene Expression Profiles

[0112] A gene expression profile comprises a plurality of cDNAs and a plurality of detectable hybridization complexes, wherein each complex is formed by hybridization of one or more probes to one or more complementary nucleic acids in a sample. The cDNAs of the invention are used as elements on an array to analyze gene expression profiles. In one embodiment, the array is used to monitor the progression of disease. Researchers can assess and catalog the differences in gene expression between healthy and diseased tissues or cells. By analyzing changes in patterns of gene expression, disease can be diagnosed at earlier stages before the patient is symptomatic. The invention can be used to formulate a prognosis and to design a treatment regimen. The invention can also be used to monitor the efficacy of treatment. For treatments with known side effects, an array is employed to improve the treatment regimen. A dosage is established that causes a change in genetic expression patterns indicative of successful treatment. Expression patterns associated with the onset of undesirable side effects are avoided. This approach may be more sensitive and rapid than waiting for the patient to show inadequate improvement, or to manifest side effects, before altering the course of treatment.

[0113] Experimentally, expression profiles can also be evaluated by methods including, but not limited to, differential display by spatial immobilization or by gel electrophoresis, genome mismatch scanning, representational discriminate analysis, transcript imaging, and by protein or antibody arrays. Expression profiles produced by these methods may be used alone or in combination. The correspondence between mRNA and protein expression has been discussed by Zweiger (2001, Transducing the Genome. McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, Calif.) and Glavas et al. (2001; T cell activation upregulates cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases 8A1 and 7A3, Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:6319-6342) among others.

[0114] In another embodiment, animal models which mimic a human disease can be used to characterize expression profiles associated with a particular condition, disorder or disease; or treatment of the condition, disorder or disease. Novel treatment regimens may be tested in these animal models using arrays to establish and then follow expression profiles over time. In addition, arrays may be used with cell cultures or tissues removed from animal models to rapidly screen large numbers of candidate drug molecules, looking for ones that produce an expression profile similar to those of known therapeutic drugs, with the expectation that molecules with the same expression profile will likely have similar therapeutic effects. Thus, the invention provides the means to rapidly determine the molecular mode of action of a drug.

[0115] Assays Using Antibodies

[0116] Antibodies directed against antigenic determinants of a protein encoded by a cDNA of the invention may be used in assays to quantify the amount of protein found in a particular human cell. Such assays include methods utilizing the antibody and a label to detect expression level under normal or disease conditions. The antibodies may be used with or without modification, and labeled by joining them, either covalently or noncovalently, with a labeling moiety.

[0117] Protocols for detecting and measuring protein expression using either polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies are well known in the art. Examples include ELISA, RIA, fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS), and arrays. Such immunoassays typically involve the formation of complexes between the protein and its specific antibody and the measurement of such complexes. These and other assays are described in Pound (sura).

[0118] Therapeutics

[0119] The cDNAs and fragments thereof can be used in gene therapy. cDNAs can be delivered ex vivo to target cells, such as cells of bone marrow. Once stable integration and transcription and or translation are confirmed, the bone marrow may be reintroduced into the subject. Expression of the protein encoded by the cDNA may correct a disorder associated with mutation of a normal sequence, reduction or loss of an endogenous target protein, or overepression of an endogenous or mutant protein. Alternatively, cDNAs may be delivered in vivo using vectors such as retrovirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpes simplex virus, and bacterial plasmids. Non-viral methods of gene delivery include cationic liposomes, polylysine conjugates, artificial viral envelopes, and direct injection of DNA (Anderson (1998) Nature 392:25-30; Dachs et al. (1997) Oncol Res 9:313-325; Chu et al. (1998) J Mol Med 76(34): 184-192; Weiss et al. (1999) Cell Mol Life Sci 55(3):334-358; Agrawal (1996) Antisense Therapeutics, Humana Press, Totowa N.J.; and August et al. (1997) Gene Therapy (Advances in Pharmacology Vol. 40), Academic Press, San Diego Calif.).

[0120] In addition, expression of a particular protein can be regulated through the specific binding of a fragment of a cDNA to a genomic sequence or an mRNA which encodes the protein or directs its transcription or translation. The cDNA can be modified or derivatized to any RNA-like or DNA-like material including peptide nucleic acids, branched nucleic acids, and the like. These sequences can be produced biologically by transforming an appropriate host cell with a vector containing the sequence of interest.

[0121] Molecules which regulate the activity of the cDNA or encoded protein are useful as therapeutics for colon cancer and other neoplastic disorders. Such molecules include agonists which increase the expression or activity of the polynucleotide or encoded protein, respectively; or antagonists which decrease expression or activity of the polynucleotide or encoded protein, respectively. In one aspect, an antibody which specifically binds the protein may be used directly as an antagonist or indirectly as a delivery mechanism for bringing a pharmaceutical agent to cells or tissues which express the protein.

[0122] Additionally, any of the proteins, or their ligands, or complementary nucleic acid sequences may be administered as pharmaceutical compositions or in combination with other appropriate therapeutic agents. Selection of the appropriate agents for use in combination therapy may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art, according to conventional pharmaceutical principles. The combination of therapeutic agents may act synergistically to affect the treatment or prevention of the conditions and disorders associated with an immune response. Using this approach, one may be able to achieve therapeutic efficacy with lower dosages of each agent, thus reducing the potential for adverse side effects. Further, the therapeutic agents may be combined with pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers including excipients and auxiliaries which facilitate processing of the active compounds into preparations which can be used pharmaceutically. Further details on techniques for formulation and administration used by doctors and pharmacists may be found in the latest edition of Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences (Mack Publishing, Easton Pa.).

[0123] Model Systems

[0124] Animal models may be used as bioassays where they exhibit a phenotypic response similar to that of humans and where exposure conditions are relevant to human exposures. Mammals are the most common models, and most infectious agent, cancer, drug, and toxicity studies are performed on rodents such as rats or mice because of low cost, availability, lifespan, reproductive potential, and abundant reference literature. Inbred and outbred rodent strains provide a convenient model for investigation of the physiological consequences of underexpression or overexpression of genes of interest and for the development of methods for diagnosis and treatment of diseases. A mammal inbred to overexpress a particular gene (for example, secreted in milk) may also serve as a convenient source of the protein expressed by that gene.

[0125] Transgenic Animal Models

[0126] Transgenic rodents that overexpress or underexpress a gene of interest may be inbred and used to model human diseases or to test therapeutic or toxic agents. (See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,175,383 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,767,337.) In some cases, the introduced gene may be activated at a specific time in a specific tissue type during fetal or postnatal development. Expression of the transgene is monitored by analysis of phenotype, of tissue-specific mRNA expression, or of serum and tissue protein levels in transgenic animals before, during, and after challenge with experimental drug therapies.

[0127] Embryonic Stem Cells

[0128] Embryonic (ES) stem cells isolated from rodent embryos retain the potential to form embryonic tissues. When ES cells such as the mouse 129/SvJ cell line are placed in a blastocyst from the C57BL/6 mouse strain, they resume normal development and contribute to tissues of the live-born animal. ES cells are preferred for use in the creation of experimental knockout and knockin animals. The method for this process is well known in the art and the steps are: the cDNA is introduced into a vector, the vector is transformed into ES cells, transformed cells are identified and microinjected into mouse cell blastocysts, blastocysts are surgically transferred to pseudopregnant dams. The resulting chimeric progeny are genotyped and bred to produce heterozygous or homozygous strains.

[0129] Knockout Analysis

[0130] In gene knockout analysis, a region of a gene is enzymatically modified to include a non-natural intervening sequence such as the neomycin phosphotransferase gene (neo; Capecchi (1989) Science 244:1288-1292). The modified gene is transformed into cultured ES cells and integrates into the endogenous genome by homologous recombination. The inserted sequence disrupts transcription and translation of the endogenous gene.

[0131] Knockin Analysis

[0132] ES cells can be used to create knockin humanized animals or transgenic animal models of human diseases. With knockin technology, a region of a human gene is injected into animal ES cells, and the human sequence integrates into the animal cell genome. Transgenic progeny or inbred lines are studied and treated with potential pharmaceutical agents to obtain information on the progression and treatment of the analogous human condition.

[0133] As described herein, the uses of the cDNAs, provided in the Sequence Listing of this application, and their encoded proteins are exemplary of known techniques and are not intended to reflect any limitation on their use in any technique that would be known to the person of average skill in the art. Furthermore, the cDNAs provided in this application may be used in molecular biology techniques that have not yet been developed, provided the new techniques rely on properties of nucleotide sequences that are currently known to the person of ordinary skill in the art, e.g., the triplet genetic code, specific base pair interactions, and the like. Likewise, reference to a method may include combining more than one method for obtaining or assembling full length cDNA sequences that will be known to those skilled in the art. It is also to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular methodology, protocols, and reagents described, as these may vary. It is also understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention which will be limited only by the appended claims. The examples below are provided to illustrate the subject invention and are not included for the purpose of limiting the invention.

EXAMPLES

[0134] I Construction of cDNA Libraries

[0135] RNA was purchased from Clontech Laboratories (Palo Alto Calif.) or isolated from various tissues. Some tissues were homogenized and lysed in guanidinium isothiocyanate, while others were homogenized and lysed in phenol or in a suitable mixture of denaturants, such as TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen). The resulting lysates were centrifuged over CsCl cushions or extracted with chloroform. RNA was precipitated with either isopropanol or ethanol and sodium acetate, or by other routine methods.

[0136] Phenol extraction and precipitation of RNA were repeated as necessary to increase RNA purity. In most cases, RNA was treated with DNAse. For most libraries, poly(A) RNA was isolated using oligo d(T)-coupled paramagnetic particles (Promega), OLIGOTEX latex particles (Qiagen, Valencia Calif.), or an OLIGOTEX mRNA purification kit (Qiagen). Alternatively, poly(A) RNA was isolated directly from tissue lysates using other kits, including the POLY(A) PURE mRNA purification kit (Ambion, Austin Tex.).

[0137] In some cases, Stratagene (La Jolla Calif.) was provided with RNA and constructed the corresponding cDNA libraries. Otherwise, cDNA was synthesized and cDNA libraries were constructed with the UNIZAP vector system (Stratagene) or SUPERSCRIPT plasmid system (Invitrogen) using the recommended procedures or similar methods known in the art (Ausubel, supra, Units 5.1 through 6.6). Reverse transcription was initiated using oligo d(T) or random primers. Synthetic oligonucleotide adapters were ligated to double stranded cDNA, and the cDNA was digested with the appropriate restriction enzyme or enzymes. For most libraries, the cDNA was size-selected (300-1000 bp) using SEPHACRYL S 1000, SEPHAROSE CL2B, or SEPHAROSE CL4B column chromatography (APB) or preparative agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNAs were ligated into compatible restriction enzyme sites of the polylinker of the pBLUESCRIPT phagemid (Stratagene), pSPORT1 plasmid (Invitrogen), or pINCY plasmid (Incyte Genomics). Recombinant plasmids were transformed into XL1-BLUE, XL1-BLUEMRF, or SOLR competent E. coli cells (Stratagene) or DH5α, DH10B, or ELECTROMAX DH10B competent E. coli cells (Invitrogen).

[0138] In some cases, libraries were superinfected with a 5× excess of the helper phage, Ml 3K07, according to the method of Vieira et al. (1987, Methods Enzymol 153:3-11) and normalized or subtracted using a methodology adapted from Soares (1994, Proc Natl Acad Sci 91:9228-9232), Swaroop et al. (1991, Nucleic Acids Res 19:1954), and Bonaldo et al. (1996, Genome Res 6:791-806). The modified Soares normalization procedure was utilized to reduce the repetitive cloning of highly expressed high abundance cDNAs while maintaining the overall sequence complexity of the library. Modification included significantly longer hybridization times which allowed for increased gene discovery rates by biasing the normalized libraries toward those infrequently expressed low-abundance cDNAs which are poorly represented in a standard transcript image (Soares, supra).

[0139] II Isolation and Sequencing of cDNA Clones

[0140] Plasmids were recovered from host cells by in vivo excision using the UNIZAP vector system (Stratagene) or by cell lysis. Plasmids were purified using one of the following: the Magic or WIZARD MINIPREPS DNA purification system (Promega); the AGTC MINIPREP purification kit (Edge BioSystems, Gaithersburg Md.); the QIAWELL 8, QIAWELL 8 Plus, or QIAWELL 8 Ultra plasmid purification systems, or the REAL PREP 96 plasmid purification kit (Qiagen). Following precipitation, plasmids were resuspended in 0.1 ml of distilled water and stored, with or without lyophilization, at 4° C.

[0141] Alternatively, plasmid DNA was amplified from host cell lysates using direct link PCR in a high-throughput format (Rao (1994) Anal Biochem 216:1-14). Host cell lysis and thermal cycling steps were carried out in a single reaction mixture. Samples were processed and stored in 384-well plates, and the concentration of amplified plasmid DNA was quantified fluorometrically using PICOGREEN dye (Molecular Probes) and a FLUOROSKAN II fluorescence scanner (Labsystems Oy, Helsinki Finland).

[0142] cDNA sequencing reactions were processed using standard methods or high-throughput instrumentation such as the CATALYST 800 thermal cycler (ABI) or the DNA ENGINE thermal cycler (MJ Research, Watertown Mass.) in conjunction with the HYDRA microdispenser (Robbins Scientific, Sunnyvale Calif.) or the MICROLAB 2200 system (Hamilton, Reno Nev.). cDNA sequencing reactions were prepared using reagents provided by APB or supplied in sequencing kits such as the PRISM BIGDYE cycle sequencing kit (ABI). Electrophoretic separation of cDNA sequencing reactions and detection of labeled cDNAs were carried out using the MEGABACE 1000 DNA sequencing system (APB); the PRISM 373 or 377 sequencing systems (ABI) in conjunction with standard protocols and base calling software; or other sequence analysis systems known in the art. Reading frames within the cDNA sequences were identified using standard methods (reviewed in Ausubel, supra, Unit 7.7).

[0143] III Extension of cDNA Sequences

[0144] Nucleic acid sequences were extended using the cDNA clones and oligonucleotide primers. One primer was synthesized to initiate 5′ extension of the known fragment, and the other, to initiate 3′ extension of the known fragment. The initial primers were designed using OLIGO primer analysis software (Molecular Biology Insights, Cascade Colo.), or another appropriate program, to be about 22 to 30 nucleotides in length, to have a GC content of about 50% or more, and to anneal to the target sequence at temperatures of about 68° C. to about 72° C. Any stretch of nucleotides which would result in hairpin structures and primer-primer dimerizations was avoided.

[0145] Selected human cDNA libraries were used to extend the sequence. If more than one extension was necessary or desired, additional or nested sets of primers were designed. Preferred libraries are ones that have been size-selected to include larger cDNAs. Also, random primed libraries are preferred because they will contain more sequences with the 5′ and upstream regions of genes. A randomly primed library is particularly useful if an oligo d(T) library does not yield a full-length cDNA.

[0146] High fidelity amplification was obtained by PCR using methods well known in the art. PCR was performed in 96-well plates using the DNA ENGINE thermal cycler (MJ Research). The reaction mix contained DNA template, 200 mmol of each primer, reaction buffer containing Mg2+, (NH4)2SO4, and β-mercaptoethanol, Taq DNA polymerase (APB), ELONGASE enzyme (Invitrogen), and Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene), with the following parameters for primer pair PCI A and PCI B (Incyte Genomics): Step 1: 94° C., 3 minutes; Step 2: 94° C., 15 seconds; Step 3: 60° C., 1 minute; Step 4: 68° C., 2 minutes; Step 5: Steps 2, 3, and 4 repeated 20 times; Step 6: 68° C., 5 minutes; Step 7: storage at 4° C. In the alternative, the parameters for primer pair T7 and SK+ (Stratagene) were as follows: Step 1: 94° C., 3 minutes; Step 2: 94° C., 15 seconds; Step 3: 57° C., 1 minutes; Step 4: 68° C., 2 minutes; Step 5: Steps 2, 3, and 4 repeated 20 times; Step 6: 68° C., 5 minutes; Step 7: storage at 4° C.

[0147] The concentration of DNA in each well was determined by dispensing 100 μl PICOGREEN reagent (0.25% reagent in 1× TE, v/v; Molecular Probes) and 0.5 μl of undiluted PCR product into each well of an opaque fluorimeter plate (Corning Costar, Acton Mass.) and allowing the DNA to bind to the reagent. The plate was scanned in a FLUOROSKAN II (Labsystems Oy) to measure the fluorescence of the sample and to quantify the concentration of DNA. A 5 μl to 10 μl aliquot of the reaction mixture was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose mini-gel to determine which reactions were successful in extending the sequence.

[0148] The extended nucleic acids were desalted and concentrated, transferred to 384-well plates, digested with CviJI cholera virus endonuclease (Molecular Biology Research, Madison Wis.), and sonicated or sheared prior to religation into pUC18 vector (APB). For shotgun sequencing, the digested nucleic acids were separated on low concentration (0.6 to 0.8%) agarose gels, fragments were excised, and agar digested with AGARACE enzyme (Promega). Extended clones were religated using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Beverly Mass.) into pUC18 vector (APB), treated with Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) to fill-in restriction site overhangs, and transformed into competent E. coli cells. Transformed cells were selected on antibiotic-containing media, and individual colonies were picked and cultured overnight at 37° C. in 384-well plates in LB/2× carbenicillin liquid media.

[0149] The cells were lysed, and DNA was amplified by PCR using Taq DNA polymerase (APB) and Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) with the following parameters: Step 1: 94° C., 3 minutes; Step 2: 94° C., 15 seconds; Step 3: 60° C., 1 minute; Step 4: 72° C., 2 minutes; Step 5: steps 2, 3, and 4 repeated 29 times; Step 6: 72° C., 5 minutes; Step 7: storage at 4° C. DNA was quantified using PICOGREEN reagent (Molecular Probes) as described above. Samples with low DNA recoveries were reamplified using the same conditions described above. Samples were diluted with 20% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; 1:2, v/v), and sequenced using DYENAMIC energy transfer sequencing primers and the DYENAMIC DIRECT cycle sequencing kit (APB) or the PRISM BIGDYE terminator cycle sequencing kit (ABI).

[0150] IV Assembly and Analysis of Sequences

[0151] Component nucleotide sequences from chromatograms were subjected to PHRED analysis (Phil Green, University of Washington, Seattle Wash.) and assigned a quality score. The sequences having at least a required quality score were subject to various pre-processing algorithms to eliminate low quality 3′ ends, vector and linker sequences, polyA tails, Alu repeats, mitochondrial and ribosomal sequences, bacterial contamination sequences, and sequences smaller than 50 base pairs. Sequences were screened using the BLOCK 2 program (Incyte Genomics), a motif analysis program based on sequence information contained in the SWISS-PROT and PROSITE databases (Bairoch et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res 25:217-221; Attwood et al. (1997) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:417424).

[0152] Processed sequences were subjected to assembly procedures in which the sequences were assigned to bins, one sequence per bin. Sequences in each bin were assembled to produce consensus sequences, templates. Subsequent new sequences were added to existing bins using BLAST (Altschul 1990 (supra); Altschul 1993 (supra); Karlin et al. (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci 85:841-845), BLASTn (vers. 1.4, Washington University), and CROSSMATCH software (Green, supra). Candidate pairs were identified as all BLAST hits having a quality score greater than or equal to 150. Alignments of at least 82% local identity were accepted into the bin. The component sequences from each bin were assembled using PHRAP (Green, supra). Bins with several overlapping component sequences were assembled using DEEP PHRAP (Green, supra).

[0153] Bins were compared against each other, and those having local similarity of at least 82% were combined and reassembled. Reassembled bins having templates of insufficient overlap (less than 95% local identity) were re-split. Assembled templates were also subjected to analysis by STITCHER/EXON MAPPER algorithms which analyzed the probabilities of the presence of splice variants, alternatively spliced exons, splice junctions, differential expression of alternative spliced genes across tissue types, disease states, and the like. These resulting bins were subjected to several rounds of the above assembly procedures to generate the template sequences found in the LIFESEQ GOLD database (Incyte Genomics).

[0154] The assembled templates were annotated using the following procedure. Template sequences were analyzed using BLASTn (vers. 2.0, NCBI) versus GBpri (GenBank vers. 116). “Hits” were defined as an exact match having from 95% local identity over 200 base pairs through 100% local identity over 100 base pairs, or a homolog match having an E-value equal to or greater than 1×10−8. (The “E-value” quantifies the statistical probability that a match between two sequences occurred by chance). The hits were subjected to frameshift FASTx versus GENPEPT (GenBank version 109). In this analysis, a homolog match was defined as having an E-value of 1×10−8. The assembly method used above was described in U.S. Ser. No. 09/276,534, filed Mar. 25, 1999, and the LIFESEQ GOLD user manual (Incyte Genomics).

[0155] Following assembly, template sequences were subjected to motif, BLAST, Hidden Markov Model (HMM; Pearson and Lipman (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci 85:2444-2448; Smith and Waterman, supra), and functional analyses, and categorized in protein hierarchies using methods described in U.S. Ser. No. 08/812,290, filed Mar. 6, 1997; U.S. Ser. No. 08/947,845, filed Oct. 9, 1997; U.S. Pat. No. 5,953,727; and U.S. Ser. No. 09/034,807, filed Mar. 4, 1998. Template sequences may be further queried against public databases such as the GenBank rodent, mammalian, vertebrate, eukaryote, prokaryote, and human EST databases.

[0156] V Selection of Sequences, Microarray Preparation and Use

[0157] Incyte clones represent template sequences derived from the LIFESEQ GOLD assembled human sequence database (Incyte Genomics). In cases where more than one clone was available for a particular template, the 5′-most clone in the template was used on the microarray. The HUMAN GENOME GEM series 1-4 microarrays (Incyte Genomics) contain 37,715 array elements which represent 12,989 annotated clusters and 24,726 unannotated clusters. Table 4 shows the GenBank annotations for SEQ ID NOs:1-48 of this invention as produced by BLAST analysis.

[0158] To construct microarrays, cDNAs were amplified from bacterial cells using primers complementary to vector sequences flanking the cDNA insert. Thirty cycles of PCR increased the initial quantity of cDNAs from 1-2 ng to a final quantity greater than 5 pg. Amplified cDNAs were then purified using SEPHACRYL-400 columns (APB). Purified cDNAs were immobilized on polymer-coated glass slides. Glass microscope slides (Corning, Corning N.Y.) were cleaned by ultrasound in 0.1% SDS and acetone, with extensive distilled water washes between and after treatments. Glass slides were etched in 4% hydrofluoric acid (VWR Scientific Products, West Chester Pa.), washed thoroughly in distilled water, and coated with 0.05% aminopropyl silane (Sigma-Aldrich) in 95% ethanol. Coated slides were cured in a 110° C. oven. cDNAs were applied to the coated glass substrate using a procedure described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,807,522. One microliter of the cDNA at an average concentration of 100 ng/ul was loaded into the open capillary printing element by a high-speed robotic apparatus which then deposited about 5 nl of cDNA per slide.

[0159] Microarrays were UV-crosslinked using a STRATALINKER UV-crosslinker (Stratagene), and then washed at room temperature once in 0.2% SDS and three times in distilled water. Non-specific binding sites were blocked by incubation of microarrays in 0.2% casein in phosphate buffered saline (Tropix, Bedford Mass.) for 30 minutes at 60° C. followed by washes in 0.2% SDS and distilled water as before.

[0160] VI Preparation of Samples

[0161] 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine Treatment of Cells

[0162] HT29 cells were derived from a Grade II adenocarcinoma of the colon obtained from a 44 year old Caucasian female. HCT116 cells are a subpopulation of malignant cells isolated from a primary cell culture of a single human colonic carcinoma (Brattain et al. (1981) Cancer Res 41:1751-6). HMEC cells are a primary human epithelial cell line derived from the breast tissue of a normal donor. HT29 and HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas Va.) were cultured in McCoy's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) at 37° C. and 5% CO2. Treated cells were exposed to 500 nM 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (Aza; Sigma-Aldrich) 24 hours after passage in complete culture medium. Control cultures were treated in parallel with phosphate buffered saline vehicle. After twenty-four hours, culture medium was replaced with drug-free medium. Control and Aza-treated cells were subcultured at equal densities at 1 and 5 days after the initial treatment, and proliferation was measured at the subsequent time point using a Coulter counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton Calif.). Cells were harvested 5 days after the initial treatment.

[0163] HNMT1 Antisense Constructs

[0164] HT29 cells were transfected with an antisense oligonucleotide directed against the DNA methyltransferase 1 enzyme (DNMT1) or with a mutant antisense oligonucleotide. Constructs were expressed for 7 days and 9 days in culture. FIG. 1 shows western blots of DNMT1 expression. (A) Expression of DNMT1 in HT29 and HCT116 cells treated with Aza. (B) Expression of DNMT1 in HT29 cells expressing a DNMT1 antisense construct.

[0165] Tissue Samples

[0166] Matched normal colon and cancerous colon or colon polyp tissue samples were provided by the Huntsman Cancer Institute, (Salt Lake City, Utah). Donor 3754 is an individual diagnosed with a pendunculated colon polyp; age and sex of the donor is unknown. Donor 3755 is an individual diagnosed with colon polyps and having a family history of colon cancer; age and sex of the donor is unknown. Donor 3583 is a 58 year-old male diagnosed with a tubulovillous adenoma hyperplastic polyp. Donor 3311 is an 85 year-old male diagnosed with an invasive, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with metastases to the lymph nodes. Donor 3756 is a 78 year-old female diagnosed with an invasive, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Donor 3757 is a 75 year-old female diagnosed with an invasive, moderate to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with metastases to the lymph nodes. Donor 3649 is an 86 year-old individual, sex unknown, diagnosed with an invasive, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Donor 3647 is an 83 year-old individual, sex unknown, diagnosed with an invasive, moderately well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with metastases to the lymph nodes. Donor 3839 is a 60 year-old individual, sex unknown, diagnosed with colon cancer. Donor 3581 is a male of unknown age diagnosed with a colorectal tumor. Donors 3754, 3755, 3311, 3756, and 3757 were matched against a common control sample comprising a pool of normal colon tissue from three additional donors. All other comparisons were done with matched normal and tumor or polyp tissue from the same donor.

[0167] Isolation and Labeling of Sample cDNAs

[0168] Cells were harvested and lysed in 1 ml of TRIZOL reagent (5×106 cells/ml; Invitrogen). The lysates were vortexed thoroughly and incubated at room temperature for 2-3 minutes and extracted with 0.5 ml chloroform. The extract was mixed, incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes, and centrifuged at 16,000× g for 15 minutes at 4° C. The aqueous layer was collected, and an equal volume of isopropanol was added. Samples were mixed, incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes, and centrifuged at 16,000× g for 20 minutes at 4° C. The supernatant was removed, and the RNA pellet was washed with 1 ml of 70% ethanol, centrifuged at 16,000× g at 4° C., and resuspended in RNAse-free water. The concentration of the RNA was determined by measuring the optical density at 260 nm.

[0169] Poly(A) RNA was prepared using an OLIGOTEX mRNA kit (Qiagen) with the following modifications: OLIGOTEX beads were washed in tubes instead of on spin columns, resuspended in elution buffer, and then loaded onto spin columns to recover mRNA. To obtain maximum yield, the mRNA was eluted twice.

[0170] Each poly(A) RNA sample was reverse transcribed using MMLV reverse-transcriptase, 0.05 pg/μl oligo-d(T) primer (21mer), 1× first strand buffer, 0.03 units/ul RNAse inhibitor, 500 uM dAT?, 500 uM dGTP, 500 uM dTTP, 40 uM dCTP, and 40 uM either dCTP-Cy3 or dCTP-Cy5 (APB). The reverse transcription reaction was performed in a 25 ml volume containing 200 ng poly(A) RNA using the GEMBRIGHT kit (Incyte Genomics). Specific control poly(A) RNAs (YCFRO6, YCFR45, YCFR67, YCFR85, YCFR43, YCFR22, YCFR23, YCFR25, YCFR44, YCFR26) were synthesized by in vitro transcription from non-coding yeast genomic DNA (W. Lei, unpublished). As quantitative controls, control mRNAs (YCFRO6, YCFR45, YCFR67, and YCFR85) at 0.002 ng, 0.02 ng, 0.2 ng, and 2 ng were diluted into reverse transcription reaction at ratios of 1:100,000, 1:10,000, 1:1000, 1:100 (w/w) to sample mRNA, respectively. To sample differential expression patterns, control mRNAs (YCFR43, YCFR22, YCFR23, YCFR25, YCFR44, YCFR26) were diluted into reverse transcription reaction at ratios of 1:3, 3:1, 1:10, 10:1, 1:25, 25:1 (w/w) to sample mRNA. Reactions were incubated at 37° C. for 2 hours, treated with 2.5 ml of 0.5M sodium hydroxide, and incubated for 20 minutes at 85° C. to the stop the reaction and degrade the RNA.

[0171] cDNAs were purified using two successive CHROMA SPIN 30 gel filtration spin columns (Clontech). Cy3- and Cy5-labeled reaction samples were combined as described below and ethanol precipitated using 1 ml of glycogen (1 mg/ml), 60 ml sodium acetate, and 300 ml of 100% ethanol. The cDNAs were then dried to completion using a SpeedVAC system (Savant Instruments, Holbrook N.Y.) and resuspended in 14 μl 5× SSC, 0.2% SDS.

[0172] VII Hybridization and Detection

[0173] Hybridization reactions contained 9 μl of sample mixture containing 0.2 μg each of Cy3 and CyS labeled cDNA synthesis products in 5× SSC, 0.2% SDS hybridization buffer. The mixture was heated to 65° C. for 5 minutes and was aliquoted onto the microarray surface and covered with an 1.8 cm2 coverslip. The microarrays were transferred to a waterproof chamber having a cavity just slightly larger than a microscope slide. The chamber was kept at 100% humidity internally by the addition of 140 μl of 5× SSC in a corner of the chamber. The chamber containing the microarrays was incubated for about 6.5 hours at 60° C. The microarrays were washed for 10 minutes at 45° C. in low stringency wash buffer (1× SSC, 0.1% SDS), three times for 10 minutes each at 45° C. in high stringency wash buffer (0.1× SSC), and dried.

[0174] Reporter-labeled hybridization complexes were detected with a microscope equipped with an Innova 70 mixed gas 10 W laser (Coherent, Santa Clara Calif.) capable of generating spectral lines at 488 nm for excitation of Cy3 and at 632 nm for excitation of Cy5. The excitation laser light was focused on the microarray using a 20×microscope objective (Nikon, Melville N.Y.). The slide containing the microarray was placed on a computer-controlled X-Y stage on the microscope and raster-scanned past the objective. The 1.8 cm×1.8 cm microarray used in the present example was scanned with a resolution of 20 micrometers.

[0175] In two separate scans, the mixed gas multiline laser excited the two fluorophores sequentially. Emitted light was split, based on wavelength, into two photomultiplier tube detectors (PMT R1477; Hamamatsu Photonics Systems, Bridgewater N.J.) corresponding to the two fluorophores. Appropriate filters positioned between the microarray and the photomultiplier tubes were used to filter the signals. The emission maxima of the fluorophores used were 565 nm for Cy3 and 650 nm for Cy5. Each microarray was typically scanned twice, one scan per fluorophore using the appropriate filters at the laser source, although the apparatus was capable of recording the spectra from both fluorophores simultaneously.

[0176] The sensitivity of the scans was calibrated using the signal intensity generated by a cDNA control species. Samples of the calibrating cDNA were separately labeled with the two fluorophores and identical amounts of each were added to the hybridization mixture. A specific location on the microarray contained a complementary DNA sequence, allowing the intensity of the signal at that location to be correlated with a weight ratio of hybridizing species of 1:100,000.

[0177] The output of the photomultiplier tube was digitized using a 12-bit RTI-835H analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion board (Analog Devices, Norwood, Mass.) installed in an IBM-compatible PC computer. The digitized data were displayed as an image where the signal intensity was mapped using a linear 20-color transformation to a pseudocolor scale ranging from blue (low signal) to red (high signal). The data was also analyzed quantitatively. Where two different fluorophores were excited and measured simultaneously, the data were first corrected for optical crosstalk (due to overlapping emission spectra) between the fluorophores using each fluorophore's emission spectrum.

[0178] A grid was superimposed over the fluorescence signal image such that the signal from each spot was centered in each element of the grid. The fluorescence signal within each element was then integrated to obtain a numerical value corresponding to the average intensity of the signal. The software used for signal analysis was the GEMTOOLS gene expression analysis program (Incyte Genomics). Significance was defined as signal to background ratio exceeding 2× and area hybridization exceeding 40%.

[0179] VIII Data Analysis and Results

[0180] Array elements that exhibited at least a signal intensity over 250 units, a signal-to-background ratio of at least 2.5, and an element spot size of at least 40% were identified as differentially expressed using the GEMTOOLS program (Incyte Genomics). Differential expression values were converted to log base 2 scale. The clones representing cDNAs of the invention that showed differential expression greater than 1.8-fold in both HT29 and HCT116 cell lines treated with Aza and less than 1.8-fold differential expression in HMEC cells treated with Aza that are shown in Table 1; negative values represent upregulation. The clones upregulated 1.8-fold in either HT29 or HCT116 cells treated with Aza and downregulated in colon tumor tissues relative to normal colon are shown in Table 2. The cDNAs represented by the clones in Tables 1 and 2 are shown in Table 4. The cDNAs are identified by their SEQ ID NO, Template ID, and by the description associated with at least a fragment of a polynucleotide found in GenBank. The descriptions were obtained using the sequences of the Sequence Listing and BLAST analysis. Table 3 provides a map between those clones on the microarray and those appearing in Tables 1 and 2, and cDNAs appearing in Table 4.

[0181] IX Further Characterization of Differentially Expressed cDNAs and Proteins

[0182] Clones were blasted against the LIFESEQ GOLD 5.1 database (Incyte Genomics) and an Incyte template was chosen for each clone. The template was blasted against GenBank database to acquire annotation. The nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acid sequences which were blasted against GenPept and other protein databases to acquire annotation and characterization, i.e., structural motifs. Different templates identified in Table 1 may share an identical GenBank annotation. These templates represent related homologs or splice variants. Templates with no similarity to a sequence in the GenBank database are identified in Table 1 as “Incyte Unique”.

[0183] Percent sequence identity can be determined electronically for two or more amino acid or nucleic acid sequences using the MEGALIGN program, a component of LASERGENE software (DNASTAR). The percent identity between two amino acid sequences is calculated by dividing the length of sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence B, into the sum of the residue matches between sequence A and sequence B, times one hundred. Gaps of low or of no homology between the two amino acid sequences are not included in determining percentage identity.

[0184] Sequences with conserved protein motifs may be searched using the BLOCKS search program. This program analyses sequence information contained in the SWISSPROT and PROSITE databases and is useful for determining the classification of uncharacterized proteins translated from genomic or cDNA sequences (Bairoch, supra; Attwood, supra). PROSITE database is a useful source for identifying functional or structural domains that are not detected using motifs due to extreme sequence divergence. Using weight matrices, these domains are calibrated against the SWISSPROT database to obtain a measure of the chance distribution of the matches.

[0185] The PRINTS database can be searched using the BLIMPS search program to obtain protein family “fingerprints”. The PRINTS database complements the PROSITE database by exploiting groups of conserved motifs within sequence alignments to build characteristic signatures of different protein families. For both BLOCKS and PRINTS analyses, the cutoff scores for local similarity were: >1300=strong, 1000-1300=suggestive; for global similarity were: p<exp-3; and for strength (degree of correlation) were: >1300=strong, 1000-1300=weak. Pfam is a large collection of multiple sequence alignments and hidden Markov models covering many common protein domains. Version 5.5 of Pfam (September 2000) contains alignments and models for 2478 protein families, based on the SWISSPROT 38 and SP-TrEMBL 11 protein sequence databases.

[0186] X Other Hybridization Technologies and Analyses

[0187] Other hybridization technologies utilize a variety of substrates such as nylon membranes, capillary tubes, etc. Arranging cDNAs on polymer coated slides is described in Example V; sample cDNA preparation and hybridization and analysis using polymer coated slides is described in examples VI and VII, respectively.

[0188] The cDNAs are applied to a membrane substrate by one of the following methods. A mixture of cDNAs is fractionated by gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nylon membrane by capillary transfer. Alternatively, the cDNAs are individually ligated to a vector and inserted into bacterial host cells to form a library. The cDNAs are then arranged on a substrate by one of the following methods. In the first method, bacterial cells containing individual clones are robotically picked and arranged on a nylon membrane. The membrane is placed on LB agar containing selective agent (carbenicillin, kanamycin, ampicillin, or chloramphenicol depending on the vector used) and incubated at 37° C. for 16 hours. The membrane is removed from the agar and consecutively placed colony side up in 10% SDS, denaturing solution (1.5 M NaCl, 0.5 M NaOH), neutralizing solution (1.5 M NaCl, 1 M Tris, pH 8.0), and twice in 2× SSC for 10 minutes each. The membrane is then UV irradiated in a STRATALINKER UV-crosslinker (Stratagene).

[0189] In the second method, cDNAs are amplified from bacterial vectors by thirty cycles of PCR using primers complementary to vector sequences flanking the insert. PCR amplification increases a starting concentration of 1-2 ng nucleic acid to a final quantity greater than 5 μg. Amplified nucleic acids from about 400 bp to about 5000 bp in length are purified using SEPHACRYL-400 beads (APB). Purified nucleic acids are arranged on a nylon membrane manually or using a dot/slot blotting manifold and suction device and are immobilized by denaturation, neutralization, and UV irradiation as described above.

[0190] Hybridization probes derived from cDNAs of the Sequence Listing are employed for screening cDNAs, mRNAs, or genomic DNA in membrane-based hybridizations. Probes are prepared by diluting the cDNAs to a concentration of 40-50 ng in 45 μl Tris-EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid) (TE) buffer, denaturing by heating to 100° C. for five minutes and briefly centrifuging. The denatured cDNA is then added to a REDIPRIME tube (APB), gently mixed until blue color is evenly distributed, and briefly centrifuged. Five microliters of [32P]dCTP is added to the tube, and the contents are incubated at 37° C. for 10 minutes. The labeling reaction is stopped by adding 5 μl of 0.2M EDTA, and probe is purified from unincorporated nucleotides using a PROBEQUANT G-50 microcolumn (APB). The purified probe is heated to 100° C. for five minutes and then snap cooled for 2 minutes on ice.

[0191] Membranes are pre-hybridized in hybridization solution containing 1% Sarkosyl and 1× high phosphate buffer (0.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M Na2HPO4, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7) at 55° C. for 2 hours. The probe, diluted in 15 ml fresh hybridization solution, is then added to the membrane. The membrane is hybridized with the probe at 55° C. for 16 hours. Following hybridization, the membrane is washed for 15 minutes at 25° C. in 1 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1% Sarkosyl, and four times for 15 minutes each at 25° C. in 1 mM Tris (pH 8.0). To detect hybridization complexes, XOMAT-AR film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester N.Y.) is exposed to the membrane overnight at −70° C., developed, and examined.

[0192] XI Expression of the Encoded Protein

[0193] Expression and purification of a protein encoded by a cDNA of the invention is achieved using bacterial or virus-based expression systems. For expression in bacteria, cDNA is subcloned into a vector containing an antibiotic resistance gene and an inducible promoter that directs high levels of cDNA transcription. Examples of such promoters include, but are not limited to, the trp-lac (tac) hybrid promoter and the T5 or T7 bacteriophage promoter in conjunction with the lac operator regulatory element. Recombinant vectors are transformed into bacterial hosts, such as BL21(DE3). Antibiotic resistant bacteria express the protein upon induction with IPTG. Expression in eukaryotic cells is achieved by infecting Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) insect cells with recombinant baculovirus, Autographica californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. The polyhedrin gene of baculovirus is replaced with the cDNA by either homologous recombination or bacterial-mediated transposition involving transfer plasmid intermediates. Viral infectivity is maintained and the strong polyhedrin promoter drives high levels of transcription.

[0194] For ease of purification, the protein is synthesized as a fusion protein with glutathione-S-transferase (GST; APB) or a similar alternative such as FLAG. The fusion protein is purified on immobilized glutathione under conditions that maintain protein activity and antigenicity. After purification, the GST moiety is proteolytically cleaved from the protein with thrombin. A fusion protein with FLAG, an 8-amino acid peptide, is purified using commercially available monoclonal and polyclonal anti-FLAG antibodies (Eastman Kodak, Rochester N.Y.).

[0195] XII Production of Specific Antibodies

[0196] A denatured protein from a reverse phase HPLC separation is obtained in quantities up to 75 mg. This denatured protein is used to immunize mice or rabbits following standard protocols. About 100 μg is used to immunize a mouse, while up to 1 mg is used to immunize a rabbit. The denatured protein is radioiodinated and incubated with murine B-cell hybridomas to screen for monoclonal antibodies. About 20 mg of protein is sufficient for labeling and screening several thousand clones.

[0197] In another approach, the amino acid sequence translated from a cDNA of the invention is analyzed using PROTEAN software (DNASTAR) to determine antigenic determinants of the protein. The optimal sequences for immunization are usually at the C-terminus, the N-terminus, and those intervening, hydrophilic regions of the protein that are likely to be exposed to the external environment when the protein is in its natural conformation. Typically, oligopeptides about 15 residues in length are synthesized using a 431 peptide synthesizer (ABI) using Fmoc-chemistry and then coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH; Sigma-Aldrich) by reaction with M-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester. If necessary, a cysteine may be introduced at the N-terminus of the peptide to permit coupling to KLH. Rabbits are immunized with the oligopeptide-KLH complex in complete Freund's adjuvant. The resulting antisera are tested for antipeptide activity by binding the peptide to plastic, blocking with 1% BSA, reacting with rabbit antisera, washing, and reacting with radioiodinated goat anti-rabbit IgG.

[0198] Hybridomas are prepared and screened using standard techniques. Hybridomas of interest are detected by screening with radioiodinated protein to identify those fusions producing a monoclonal antibody specific for the protein. In a typical protocol, wells of 96 well plates (FAST, Becton-Dickinson, Palo Alto Calif.) are coated with affinity-purified, specific rabbit-anti-mouse (or suitable anti-species Ig) antibodies at 10 mg/ml. The coated wells are blocked with 1% BSA and washed and exposed to supernatants from hybridomas. After incubation, the wells are exposed to radiolabeled protein at 1 mg/ml. Clones producing antibodies bind a quantity of labeled protein that is detectable above background.

[0199] Such clones are expanded and subjected to 2 cycles of cloning at 1 cell/3 wells. Cloned hybridomas are injected into pristane-treated mice to produce ascites, and monoclonal antibody is purified from the ascitic fluid by affinity chromatography on protein A (APB). Monoclonal antibodies with affinities of at least 108 M−1, preferably 109 to 1010 M−1 or stronger, are made by procedures well known in the art.

[0200] XIII Purification of Naturally Occurring Protein Using Specific Antibodies

[0201] Naturally occurring or recombinant protein is purified by immunoaffinity chromatography using antibodies specific for the protein. An immunoaffinity column is constructed by covalently coupling the antibody to CNBr-activated SEPHAROSE resin (APB). Media containing the protein is passed over the immunoaffinity column, and the column is washed using high ionic strength buffers in the presence of detergent to allow preferential absorbance of the protein. After coupling, the protein is eluted from the column using a buffer of pH 2-3 or a high concentration of urea or thiocyanate ion to disrupt antibody/protein binding, and the protein is collected.

[0202] XIV Screening Molecules for Specific Binding with the cDNA or Protein

[0203] The cDNA or fragments thereof and the protein or portions thereof are labeled with 32P-dCTP, Cy3-dCTP, Cy5-dCTP (APB), or BIODIPY or FITC (Molecular Probes), respectively. Candidate molecules or compounds previously arranged on a substrate are incubated in the presence of labeled nucleic or amino acid. After incubation under conditions for either a cDNA or a protein, the substrate is washed, and any position on the substrate retaining label, which indicates specific binding or complex formation, is assayed. The binding molecule is identified by its arrayed position on the substrate. Data obtained using different concentrations of the nucleic acid or protein are used to calculate affinity between the labeled nucleic acid or protein and the bound molecule. High throughput screening using very small assay volumes and very small amounts of test compound is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,876,946.

[0204] All patents and publications mentioned in the specification are incorporated herein by reference. Various modifications and variations of the described method and system of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention that are obvious to those skilled in the field of molecular biology or related fields are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.

1TABLE 1HT29 t/DNMTHT29 t/DNMTClone IDHT29 t/ Aza (5d)antisense (7d)antisense (9d)HCT116 t/Aza (5d)HMEC t/Aza (4d)HMEC t/Aza (9d)2416222−1.740.000.00−1.720.000.004103545−1.89−0.260.20−1.35−0.13−0.43322569−4.17−0.07−1.14−1.17−0.53−0.805322134−2.12−0.14−0.20−1.72−0.32−0.431698458−1.79−0.140.00−1.320.260.261871523−1.07−0.480.00−0.85−0.24−0.076024084−2.79−0.140.00−2.660.000.003810006−0.92−0.580.00−0.850.000.004508879−0.85−0.380.00−0.89−0.14−0.204225379−0.850.000.00−0.890.000.003463713−1.870.000.00−1.46−0.26−0.482998017−1.14−0.26−0.32−1.230.000.004318273−1.580.260.14−1.070.00−0.261649414−1.20−0.26−0.38−1.00−0.32−0.321684742−0.85−0.53−0.60−0.89−0.36−0.202825816−1.840.00−0.24−0.890.000.002440943−1.07−0.14−0.43−1.00−0.20−0.261294339−0.93−0.07−0.53−0.89−0.68−0.725104741−0.93−0.140.00−1.230.000.001855389−2.090.140.32−1.51−0.14−0.265207613−2.100.140.14−1.67−0.26−0.373207902−1.290.14−0.20−0.89−0.14−0.264999769−1.260.140.20−1.090.000.07408886−1.31−0.320.00−2.32−0.26−0.324764233−2.000.000.00−1.790.000.002511379−1.98−0.140.14−1.340.320.322471817−1.20−0.070.07−0.890.070.003333736−1.38−0.260.00−1.380.060.001304365−2.480.000.00−1.780.000.002657056−1.930.070.00−1.580.130.002507719−2.32−0.13−0.34−1.70−0.48−0.244688−2.030.00−0.07−1.14−0.13−0.132068708−1.17−0.48−0.96−0.46−0.50−0.2423770−2.990.00−0.89−0.72−0.48−0.631616783−0.84−1.14−1.20−0.80−0.53−0.20820942−0.580.00−1.10−0.26−0.48−0.208913220.00−0.26−1.63−0.580.000.002755836−0.68−0.88−0.63−0.58−0.26−0.311227521−2.100.20−0.43−0.58−0.19−0.632200842−1.740.260.260.000.000.002238363−1.850.200.00−0.24−0.50−0.291495382−1.070.00−0.48−0.26−0.48−0.191998269−0.92−0.380.00−0.63−0.29−0.681919287−3.12−0.140.000.000.000.002637446−1.07−0.38−0.43−0.290.000.001962141−0.430.260.32−0.920.00−0.074933404−0.32−0.130.00−2.080.960.482697455−0.320.260.20−1.14−0.63−0.372150288−0.070.140.43−0.92−0.67−0.42

[0205]

2

TABLE 2

Nrml Dn3753
Nrml Dn3753
Mucosa Nrml
Mucosa Nrml
Nrml Dn3648
Nrml Dn3648
Pool Nrml

vs. Polyp
vs. Polyp
Dn3983 vs.
Dn3983 vs.
vs. Anomatous
vs. Anomatous
Dn3583
Nrml Dn3753 vs.

Clone ID
Dn3754
Dn3755
Polyp
Polyp
Polyp
Polyp
vs. Tumor
Tumor Dn3311

1227521
1.46
0.71
0.21
0.22
0.75
1.21
0.41
0.88

2200842
1.03
0.92
0.35
0.49
0.16
0.33
0.20
0.87

2238363
1.08
0.96
0.09
0.33
0.04
0.69
0.48
0.80

1495382
1.22
0.84
−0.01
0.14
0.65
0.66
0.87
0.64

1998269
0.00
0.44
1.53
1.42
0.27
0.27
0.28
−0.36

1919287
0.61
0.52
−0.08
0.00
0.87
1.34
−0.22
0.00

2637446
0.83
0.82
−0.02
−0.14
−0.24
−0.51
−0.20
−1.44

1962141
1.23
1.50
0.42
0.47
0.54
0.58
0.81
1.14

4933404
0.05
0.21
1.59
1.92
0.56
0.45
−0.02
−0.05

2697455
1.62
2.17
0.65
0.45
0.24
0.51
1.68
1.55

2150288
1.32
1.72
0.40
0.18
−0.08
0.21
1.26
1.23

Rectum Nrml

Nrml Dn3753
Nrml Dn3753
Pool Nrml

Nrml Dn3839
Nrml Dn3580
Dn3581 vs.
Nrml Dn4614
vs. Tumor
vs. Tumor
Dn3649
Pool Nrml Dn3647

Clone ID
vs. Tumor
vs. Tumor
Tumor
vs. Tumor
Dn3756
Dn3757
vs. Tumor
vs. Tumor

1227521
0.11
0.89
0.57
1.08
0.81
1.64
0.39
0.98

2200842
0.64
1.00
−0.12
0.19
−0.22
0.52
1.35
0.83

2238363
0.00
0.34
0.47
1.42
0.10
0.94
0.32
1.67

1495382
0.32
1.63
−0.69
0.99
0.64
0.95
0.73
1.32

1998269
0.07
0.69
0.21
0.37
−1.29
−0.23
−0.11
0.66

1919287
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
−0.64

2637446
−0.33
0.00
1.36
−0.49
0.49
1.03
−0.12
0.37

1962141
0.71
0.54
0.66
0.78
0.76
1.11
0.34
1.34

4933404
−0.05
0.28
−1.50
−0.11
−0.38
−0.13
−0.60
0.00

2697455
1.37
0.89
1.45
1.01
1.30
1.45
0.83
2.13

2150288
0.99
−0.03
1.29
0.74
1.14
1.05
0.56
1.63

[0206]

3

TABLE 3

SEQ ID NO
Template ID
Clone ID
Start
Stop

1
197880.1
2416222
758
1713

2
1083426.1
4103545
1
282

3
3094768CB1
322569
241
781

5
428822.1
5322134
1
658

6
978377.4
1698458
1772
2329

7
1399910.2
1871523
2283
2738

8
347492.1
6024084
45
769

9
043408.1
3810006
267
1040

10
1399492.1
4508879
444
1335

11
994586.1
4225379
184
1338

12
445020.1
3463713
1
385

13
903494.2
2998017
64
416

14
903494.3
2998017
173
618

15
386222.1
4318273
1
237

16
1702310CB1
1649414
1282
1650

18
255173.1
1684742
351
579

19
2259590CB1
2825816
57
936

21
445016.1
2440943
519
897

22
1099221.1
1294339
155
401

23
181360.1
5104741
478
1068

24
477528.1
1855389
1
75

25
371799.1
5207613
1
119

26
1109063.1
3207902
217
685

27
033092.1
4999769
1
56

28
476301CB1
408886
1928
2452

30
980547.1
4764233
1
628

31
4030354CB1
2511379
44
581

33
1399595.1
2471817
1
555

34
1099004.11
3333736
2532
3456

35
064516CB1
1304365
63
514

37
349411.4
2657056
1
287

38
349411.2
2657056
1225
1673

39
2502336CB1
2507719
473
1659

41
410721.1
4688
1276
1548

42
221825.6
2068708
542
1206

43
2943764CB1
23770
225
466

45
218419.1
1616783
157
340

46
216103.1
820942
1
664

47
199507.1
891322
1
342

48
250091.1
2755836
2
448

49
279117.32
1227521
1698
2054

50
1397929.28
2200842
15
721

51
2238363CB1
2238363
385
915

53
059509CB1
1495382
1
656

55
1330247.24
1998269
1038
1561

56
231486.26
1919287
1932
2689

57
1383215.32
2637446
1
736

58
1701228CB1
1962141
1102
2046

60
093496.1
4933404
307
421

61
429183.1
2697455
188
515

61
429183.1
2150288
276
651

[0207]

4

TABLE 4

SEQ ID NO
Template ID
GenBank ID
E-value
Annotation

1
197880.1
g6453516
1.00E-89
hypothetical protein [Homo sapiens]

2
1083426.1

Incyte Unique

3
3094768CB1
g1177476
4.00E-67
interferon-inducible protein [Homo sapiens]

4
3094768CD1
g1177476
4.00E-67
interferon-inducible protein [Homo sapiens]

5
428822.1
g5926699
7.00E-11
chromosome 6p21.3, HLA Class I region, section 11/20 [Homo sapien

6
978377.4
g7023366
0
unnamed protein product [Homo sapiens]

7
1399910.2
g5689428
0
mRNA for KIAA1046 protein, complete cds [Homo sapiens]

8
347492.1
g8216987
2.00E-20
putative tumor antigen [Homo sapiens]

9
043408.1

Incyte Unique

10
1399492.1

Incyte Unique

11
994586.1
g37562
4.00E-09
Human gene for U 6 RNA.

12
445020.1
g3483573
0

Homo sapiens
full length insert cDNA clone ZD16H10.

13
903494.2
g3047019
6.00E-30

Homo sapiens
T-cell receptor gamma V1 gene region.

14
903494.3
g5566238
1.00E-168

Homo sapiens
T-cell gamma receptor locus, complete sequence.

15
386222.1
g35995
2.00E-13
Human pTR5 mRNA for repetitive sequence.

16
1702310CB1
g1079566
1.00E-149
Hep27 protein [Homo sapiens]

17
1702310CD1
g1079566
1.00E-149
Hep27 protein [Homo sapiens]

18
255173.1
g7020175
0

Homo sapiens
cDNA FLJ20222 fis, clone COLF5031.

19
2259590CB1
g3289985
4.00E-24
KIAA0412 [Homo sapiens]

20
2259590CD1
g3289985
4.00E-24
KIAA0412 [Homo sapiens]

21
445016.1

Incyte Unique

22
1099221.1
g35372
1.00E-104
PDGF-B (propeptide (aa 1-241) [Homo sapiens]

23
181360.1
g7022685
0

Homo sapiens
cDNA FLJ10570 fis, clone NT2RP2003117.

24
477528.1
g35996
3.00E-33
Human pTR7 mRNA for repetitive sequence.

25
371799.1
g7717307
3.00E-16

Homo sapiens
chromosome 21 segment HS21C049.

26
1109063.1
g7328084
9.00E-50
hypothetical protein [Homo sapiens]

27
033092.1
g505545
1.00E-16

H. sapiens
mRNA for Zinc-finger protein (ZNFpT17).

28
476301CB1
g485267
0
transketolase [Rattus norvegicus]

29
476301CD1
g485267
0
transketolase [Rattus norvegicus]

30
980547.1
g3511023
8.00E-06
GAGE-8 [Homo sapiens]

31
4030354CB1
g3511027
9.00E-54
GAGE-7B [Homo sapiens]

32
4030354CD1
g3511027
9.00E-54
GAGE-7B [Homo sapiens]

33
1399595.1
g3483346
3.00E-08

Homo sapiens
full length insert cDNA clone YU62C03.

34
1099004.11
g533513
1.00E-161
MAGE-11 antigen [Homo sapiens]

35
064516CB1
g3511023
3.00E-08
GAGE-8 [Homo sapiens]

36
064516CD1
g3511023
3.00E-08
GAGE-8 [Homo sapiens]

37
349411.4
g533516
1.00E-142
Human MAGE-4b antigen (MAGE4b) gene, complete cds.

38
349411.2
g533517
1.00E-156
MAGE-4b antigen [Homo sapiens]

39
2502336CB1
g533528
1.00E-136
MAGE-9 antigen [Homo sapiens]

40
2502336CD1
g533528
1.00E-136
MAGE-9 antigen [Homo sapiens]

41
410721.1
g416115
1.00E-149
MAGE-1 [Homo sapiens]

42
221825.6
g219867
6.00E-71
HM74 [Homo sapiens]

43
2943764CB1
g23396
6.00E-64
1-8D [Homo sapiens]

44
2943764CD1
g23396
6.00E-64
1-8D [Homo sapiens]

45
218419.1

Incyte Unique

46
216103.1
g7020010
0

Homo sapiens
cDNA FLJ20120 fis, clone COL05912.

47
199507.1

Incyte Unique

48
250091.1
g36515
2.00E-14
Human (HeLa) small nuclear U5 A RNA.

49
279117.32
g8886871
4.00E-34
phospholipid scramblase 1 [Homo sapiens]

50
1397929.28
g6048565
1.00E-91
retinoid inducible gene 1 [Homo sapiens]

51
2238363CB1
g6759541
1.00E-99
interferon induced [Homo sapiens]

52
2238363CD1
g6759541
1.00E-99
interferon induced [Homo sapiens]

53
059509CB1
g1149558
e-164
TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand TRAIL [Homo sapiens]

54
059509CD1
g1149558
e-164
TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand TRAIL [Homo sapiens]

55
1330247.24
g36032
4.00E-50
rhoB [Homo sapiens]

56
231486.26
g598953
0
Human gene for hepatitis C-associated microtubular aggregate

57
1383215.32
g32051
1.00E-25
HE4 protein [Homo sapiens]

58
1701228CB1
g12803727
0
Similar to keratin 7 [Homo sapiens]

59
1701228CD1
g12803727
0
Similar to keratin 7 [Homo sapiens]

60
093496.1

Incyte Unique

61
429183.1
g400416
1.00E-23
Keratin 8 [Homo sapiens]

[0208]

5

TABLE 5

SEQ ID NO
Template ID
Start
Stop
Frame
Pfam ID
Pfam Description
E-value

6
978377.4
178
1776
forward 1
PGM_PMM
Phosphoglucomutase/phosphomannomutase
1.70E − 06

17
1702310CD1
37
221
PEPT
adh_short
short chain dehydrogenase
1.00E − 55

17
1702310CD1
243
273
PEPT
adh_short_C2
Short chain dehydrogenase/reductase C-termin
5.70E − 10

20
2259590CD1
86
148
PEPT
KRAB
KRAB box
4.00E − 30

22
1099221.1
314
466
forward 2
PDGF
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)
3.60E − 29

22
1099221.1
247
318
forward 1
PDGF
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)
1.60E − 12

29
476301CD1
28
586
PEPT
tranketolase
Transketolase
7.20E − 124

34
1099004.11
1953
2648
forward 3
MAGE
MAGE family
2.30E − 151

38
349411.2
212
901
forward 2
MAGE
MAGE family
9.80E − 153

40
2502336CD1
3
230
PEPT
MAGE
MAGE family
9.80E − 144

41
410721.1
614
1279
forward 2
MAGE
MAGE family
2.60E − 143

42
221825.6
21
146
forward 3
7tm_1
7 transmembrane receptor (rhodopsin family)
3.10E − 09

[0209]

Genes regulated by DNA methylation in colon tumors

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

CPC

US Classifications

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

Provisional Applications (1)