A Sequence Listing conforming to the rules of WIPO Standard ST.26 is hereby incorporated by reference. Said Sequence Listing has been filed as an electronic document via PatentCenter in ASCII format encoded as XML. The electronic document, created on Apr. 23, 2023, is entitled “10620-025US2_ST26.xml”, and is 116,858 bytes in size.
The present disclosure relates to high-throughput detection of polyketides using genetically encoded biosensors.
Polyketides are a large group of diverse molecules that display broad and potent biological activities. Access to large quantities of polyketides and analogues thereof is critical for the discovery of new biological activities, optimization of pharmacological properties, and to probe discovery and development. Biosynthetic approaches to polyketide production offer enormous potential and several benefits compared to traditional chemical approaches. The scaffolds of many polyketides are constructed by type I polyketide synthases (PKSs). These are large multifunctional protein complexes organized in a modular fashion. Each module is responsible for the selection and installation of a ketide into the polyketide. The number, identity, and order of modules describe the structure of the corresponding polyketide. These scaffolds are often further elaborated by tailoring enzymes to afford the mature, biologically active natural product. Accordingly, these systems offer the potential for the synthesis of large quantities of polyketides via microbial fermentation and combinatorial synthesis of analogues by mixing and matching modules and tailoring enzymes. However, the sheer size, mechanistic diversity, and poor understanding of how specificity and catalysis are controlled by type I PKSs render rational design of new pathways difficult. For example, many hybrid PKSs designed to produce polyketide analogues fail or are less active than wild-type machinery. Consequently, the full synthetic potential of type I PKSs has yet to be realized. Synthetic biology and directed evolution offer an opportunity to overcome these challenges by testing the functions of large libraries of variants. Yet, the ability of synthetic biology and directed evolution approaches to be applied to polyketides is extremely limited because there are no generally applicable high-throughput tools available for screening polyketides, particularly those encoded by type I PKSs. Regulatory proteins such as transcription factors have been used as effective devices for sensitive and specific detection of various small molecules. Engineered transcription factors have been described for sensing several small molecules, including dicarboxylic acids, alcohols, and a lactone, but none have been reported for the complex products of type I PKSs.
The biosensor systems, cells, and methods disclosed herein address these and other needs.
Described herein is a platform technology that comprises genetically-encoded biosensors and methods for detection of polyketides using mutated MphR gene sequences. Such biosensors provide a scalable, economic, high-throughput, and broadly applicable means to specifically identify a target polyketide of interest from a complex mixture of molecules.
In one aspect, disclosed herein is a biosensor system comprising:
In one aspect, disclosed herein is a genetically modified host cell comprising:
In one aspect, provided herein is a method for detecting a polyketide, comprising:
In one aspect, provided herein is a method of screening for genetic mutations in a target gene, comprising:
The accompanying figures, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several aspects described below.
Described herein is a platform technology that comprises genetically-encoded biosensors and methods for detection of polyketides using mutated MphR gene sequences. Such biosensors provide a scalable, economic, high-throughput, and broadly applicable means to specifically identify a target polyketide of interest from a complex mixture of molecules.
Reference will now be made in detail to the embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the drawings and the examples. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The following definitions are provided for the full understanding of terms used in this specification.
Terms used throughout this application are to be construed with ordinary and typical meaning to those of ordinary skill in the art. However, Applicant desires that the following terms be given the particular definition as defined below.
As used in the specification and claims, the singular form “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, the term “a cell” includes a plurality of cells, including mixtures thereof.
As used herein, the terms “may,” “optionally,” and “may optionally” are used interchangeably and are meant to include cases in which the condition occurs as well as cases in which the condition does not occur.
The terms “about” and “approximately” are defined as being “close to” as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. In one non-limiting embodiment the terms are defined to be within 10%. In another non-limiting embodiment, the terms are defined to be within 5%. In still another non-limiting embodiment, the terms are defined to be within 1%.
The term “nucleic acid” as used herein means a polymer composed of nucleotides, e.g. deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides.
The terms “ribonucleic acid” and “RNA” as used herein mean a polymer composed of ribonucleotides.
The terms “deoxyribonucleic acid” and “DNA” as used herein mean a polymer composed of deoxyribonucleotides.
The term “oligonucleotide” denotes single- or double-stranded nucleotide multimers of from about 2 to up to about 100 nucleotides in length. Suitable oligonucleotides may be prepared by the phosphoramidite method described by Beaucage and Carruthers, Tetrahedron Lett., 22:1859-1862 (1981), or by the triester method according to Matteucci, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103:3185 (1981), both incorporated herein by reference, or by other chemical methods using either a commercial automated oligonucleotide synthesizer or VLSIPS™ technology. When oligonucleotides are referred to as “double-stranded,” it is understood by those of skill in the art that a pair of oligonucleotides exist in a hydrogen-bonded, helical array typically associated with, for example, DNA. In addition to the 100% complementary form of double-stranded oligonucleotides, the term “double-stranded,” as used herein is also meant to refer to those forms which include such structural features as bulges and loops, described more fully in such biochemistry texts as Stryer, Biochemistry, Third Ed., (1988), incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
The term “polynucleotide” refers to a single or double stranded polymer composed of nucleotide monomers. In some embodiments, the polynucleotide is composed of nucleotide monomers of generally greater than 100 nucleotides in length and up to about 8,000 or more nucleotides in length.
The term “polypeptide” refers to a compound made up of a single chain of D- or L-amino acids or a mixture of D- and L-amino acids joined by peptide bonds.
The term “promoter” or “regulatory element” refers to a region or sequence determinants located upstream or downstream from the start of transcription and which are involved in recognition and binding of RNA polymerase and other proteins to initiate transcription. Promoters need not be of bacterial origin, for example, promoters derived from viruses or from other organisms can be used in the compositions, systems, or methods described herein
The term “recombinant” refers to a human manipulated nucleic acid (e.g. polynucleotide) or a copy or complement of a human manipulated nucleic acid (e.g. polynucleotide), or if in reference to a protein (i.e, a “recombinant protein”), a protein encoded by a recombinant nucleic acid (e.g. polynucleotide). In embodiments, a recombinant expression cassette comprising a promoter operably linked to a second nucleic acid (e.g. polynucleotide) may include a promoter that is heterologous to the second nucleic acid (e.g. polynucleotide) as the result of human manipulation (e.g., by methods described in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning—A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., (1989) or Current Protocols in Molecular Biology Volumes 1-3, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1994-1998)). In another example, a recombinant expression cassette may comprise nucleic acids (e.g. polynucleotides) combined in such a way that the nucleic acids (e.g. polynucleotides) are extremely unlikely to be found in nature. For instance, human manipulated restriction sites or plasmid vector sequences may flank or separate the promoter from the second nucleic acid (e.g. polynucleotide). One of skill will recognize that nucleic acids (e.g. polynucleotides) can be manipulated in many ways and are not limited to the examples above.
The terms “identical” or percent “identity,” in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same (i.e., about 60% identity, preferably 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or higher identity over a specified region when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a comparison window or designated region) as measured using a BLAST or BLAST 2.0 sequence comparison algorithms with default parameters described below, or by manual alignment and visual inspection (see, e.g., NCBI web site or the like). Such sequences are then said to be “substantially identical.” This definition also refers to, or may be applied to, the compliment of a test sequence. The definition also includes sequences that have deletions and/or additions, as well as those that have substitutions. As described below, the preferred algorithms can account for gaps and the like. Preferably, identity exists over a region that is at least about 10 amino acids or 20 nucleotides in length, or more preferably over a region that is 10-50 amino acids or 20-50 nucleotides in length. As used herein, percent (%) amino acid sequence identity is defined as the percentage of amino acids in a candidate sequence that are identical to the amino acids in a reference sequence, after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary, to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity. Alignment for purposes of determining percent sequence identity can be achieved in various ways that are within the skill in the art, for instance, using publicly available computer software such as BLAST, BLAST-2, ALIGN, ALIGN-2 or Megalign (DNASTAR) software. Appropriate parameters for measuring alignment, including any algorithms needed to achieve maximal alignment over the full-length of the sequences being compared can be determined by known methods.
For sequence comparisons, typically one sequence acts as a reference sequence, to which test sequences are compared. When using a sequence comparison algorithm, test and reference sequences are entered into a computer, subsequence coordinates are designated, if necessary, and sequence algorithm program parameters are designated. Preferably, default program parameters can be used, or alternative parameters can be designated. The sequence comparison algorithm then calculates the percent sequence identities for the test sequences relative to the reference sequence, based on the program parameters.
One example of an algorithm that is suitable for determining percent sequence identity and sequence similarity are the BLAST and BLAST 2.0 algorithms, which are described in Altschul et al. (1977) Nuc. Acids Res. 25:3389-3402, and Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410, respectively. Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410). These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for mismatching residues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation (E) or 10, M=5, N=−4 and a comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength of 3, and expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff and Henikoff (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915) alignments (B) of 50, expectation (E) of 10, M=5, N=−4, and a comparison of both strands.
The BLAST algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity between two sequences (see, e.g., Karlin and Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5873-5787). One measure of similarity provided by the BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, a nucleic acid is considered similar to a reference sequence if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test nucleic acid to the reference nucleic acid is less than about 0.2, more preferably less than about 0.01.
The phrase “codon optimized” as it refers to genes or coding regions of nucleic acid molecules for the transformation of various hosts, refers to the alteration of codons in the gene or coding regions of polynucleic acid molecules to reflect the typical codon usage of a selected organism without altering the polypeptide encoded by the DNA. Such optimization includes replacing at least one, or more than one, or a significant number, of codons with one or more codons that are more frequently used in the genes of that selected organism.
Nucleic acid is “operably linked” when it is placed into a functional relationship with another nucleic acid sequence. For example, DNA for a presequence or secretory leader is operably linked to DNA for a polypeptide if it is expressed as a preprotein that participates in the secretion of the polypeptide; a promoter or enhancer is operably linked to a coding sequence if it affects the transcription of the sequence; or a ribosome binding site is operably linked to a coding sequence if it is positioned so as to facilitate translation. Generally, “operably linked” means that the DNA sequences being linked are near each other, and, in the case of a secretory leader, contiguous and in reading phase. However, operably linked nucleic acids (e.g. enhancers and coding sequences) do not have to be contiguous. Linking is accomplished by ligation at convenient restriction sites. If such sites do not exist, the synthetic oligonucleotide adaptors or linkers are used in accordance with conventional practice. In embodiments, a promoter is operably linked with a coding sequence when it is capable of affecting (e.g. modulating relative to the absence of the promoter) the expression of a protein from that coding sequence (i.e., the coding sequence is under the transcriptional control of the promoter).
“Ribosome binding site” or “RBS” is also called the Shine Dalgarno sequence and generally has a sequence complementary to the 3′ terminal of 16S rRNA. The ribosomal binding site is found in bacterial and archaeal messenger RNA, and is generally located about 8 bases upstream of the start codon AUG. In particular, the RBS sequence which appears at high frequency is AGGAGG or AAGGAGG (hereinafter these sequences are referred to as “consensus RBS sequences”), or a sequence homologous with “consensus RBS sequence”. Although these sequences appear at various sites of genes, it is understood that the RBS sequences appear at high frequency in regions upstream of start codons. Also included in the term “RBS” is the RBS sequence from the MphR gene as disclosed herein (“AGAAGG”). Other functional RBS sequences can also be used in place of the specific sequences disclosed herein. When discussing nucleotide mutations in the RBS, the first A is labeled as nucleotide “1” and the final G is labelled as nucleotide “6”. Alternatively, the mutations may sometimes referred to by their relative position to the ATG start codon. The basic structure of a prokaryote gene consists of a promoter which starts the synthesis of mRNA, a ribosome binding site which participates in the binding between mRNA and ribosomes and in the translation initiation, a start codon, a translation stop codon and a terminator which terminates the synthesis of mRNA. AUG codon is the most appropriate as a start codon. Since the start codons and coding regions are determined usually based upon a DNA sequence, in the present specification, the sequences of start codons and stop codons and sequences involved in the binding of ribosomes and mRNA are expressed as DNA sequences appropriately as well as RNA sequences, unless mentioned specifically.
The term “gene” or “gene sequence” refers to the coding sequence or control sequence, or fragments thereof. A gene may include any combination of coding sequence and control sequence, or fragments thereof. Thus, a “gene” as referred to herein may be all or part of a native gene. A polynucleotide sequence as referred to herein may be used interchangeably with the term “gene”, or may include any coding sequence, non-coding sequence or control sequence, fragments thereof, and combinations thereof. The term “gene” or “gene sequence” includes, for example, control sequences upstream of the coding sequence (for example, the ribosome binding site).
MphR Biosensors
Described herein is a platform technology that comprises genetically-encoded biosensors and methods to create them for detection of a class of small molecules called polyketides. Such biosensors provide a scalable, economic, high-throughput, and broadly applicable means to specifically identify a target polyketide of interest from complex mixtures of molecules. Polyketides are used extensively as drugs to treat human, animal, and plant diseases.
Examples of polyketides include, but are not limited to, macrolides, polyenes, enediynes, and aromatic polyketides. In some embodiments, the polyketide is a macrolide. In some embodiments, the polyketide is a 12-membered macrolide. In some embodiments, the polyketide is a 14-membered macrolide.
Due to their widespread use, polyketides are often produced in bacteria via genetic engineering. Detection of polyketides in microbial hosts remains a significant challenge however, and this limits the throughput and success of engineering approaches aimed at improving yields of polyketide and accessing new molecules. Thus, the main application of the present invention relates to the production of antibiotics, anticancer drugs, insecticides, anti-parasitics, anti-fungals, anti-cholesterol, and immunosuppressants in microbial hosts. Because the biosensors can be employed in a wide variety of contexts, other commercial applications include but are not limited to: (1) discovery of polyketide producing genes from collections of genomes; (2) identification and quantification of polyketide-based drugs, contaminants, and other molecules in environmental, clinical, and other research samples; and (3) isolation or removal of target polyketide compounds from complex mixtures.
The sensor is based on the MphR gene, which encodes a transcription factor. The natural role of wild-type (WT) MphR is to activate the expression of resistance genes in response to binding the polyketide antibiotic, erythromycin A (ErA,
In one embodiment, the operator DNA sequence is 5′-AATATAACCGACGTGACTGTTACATTTAGG-3 (SEQ ID NO:27).
The genetically-encoded biosensors described here are unique in several aspects: (1) biosensors that respond to a broad variety of polyketides are not currently known; (2) biosensors that can discriminate between very closely related polyketide structures have not been described, (3) a strategy to engineer the ligand specificity and/or amount of MphR was developed that is efficient, novel, and non-obvious; and (4) other high-throughput analytical methods/tools to detect most polyketides are not available. Accordingly, high-throughput engineering approaches such as directed gene or enzyme evolution and synthetic biology have not been applied to the vast majority of polyketides due to the lack of suitable screening tools. Such strategies are critical to overcome the poor understanding of how to design and construct biosynthetic or chemical routes to new and existing antibiotics. In contrast, the biosensor-guided approach described herein can be applied to engineering the biosynthesis of a broad range of polyketides in potentially any microbial host, and could be generalized to other classes of natural products such as peptides, alkaloids, and terpenes. The invention disclosed herein can enable production of polyketide products rapidly and at lower cost than existing manufacturing routes, thus maximizing the return on investment and providing incentive to develop new antibiotics.
The biosensor platform is simple (consisting of two genes—one encodes the genetically modified MphR gene sequence and the other encodes a marker/reporter gene (for example, GFP) under the control of the MphR responsive promoter), scalable (genetically encoded so that the host microbe synthesizes all the parts), economic, ultra-high-throughput (millions of potential polyketide producing strains can be assayed using the biosensor), and can be easily adapted to target polyketides of interest (directed evolution is a powerful strategy to engineer the ligand specificity of proteins).
MphR is a repressor protein that controls the transcription of a gene cassette responsible for resistance to macrolide antibiotics via phosphorylation of the desosamine 2′-hydroxy group of ErA. Interestingly, MphR is also de-repressed by other macrolide antibiotics, including josamycin, oleandomycin, narbomycin, methymycin and pikromycin. This promiscuity provides a platform for creating tailored MphR variants for applications related to polyketide synthetic biology and directed evolution beyond those offered by the wild-type biosensor. For example, sensors may recognize a wide variety of polyketides, sensors may distinguish biosynthetic intermediates to allow specific detection of the desired mature product, and the binding affinity and dynamic range of a given biosensor can be tailored for specific applications.
In one aspect, disclosed herein is a biosensor system comprising:
In some embodiments, the biosensor system further comprises a nucleic acid encoding an MphA gene sequence. In some embodiments, the biosensor system further comprises a nucleic acid encoding a portion of the mrx gene. In some embodiments, the biosensor system further comprises a nucleic acid encoding an MphA gene sequence and a portion of the mrx gene.
In one embodiment, the nucleic acid encoding the genetically modified MphR gene sequence and the reporter gene are located on one recombinant DNA vector. In one embodiment, the nucleic acid encoding the genetically modified MphR gene sequence and the reporter gene are located on one recombinant DNA vector.
In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, beta-galactosidase, luciferase or green fluorescent protein (GFP). In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for green fluorescent protein (GFP). In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting erythromycin A. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1G, A1T, A1C, G2T, G2A, A3C, A3G, A4T, G5T, G6T, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1G, A4T, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A1G nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence.
In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1T, G2T, A3C, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1C, G2T, A3G, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from G2A, G5T, or a combination thereof.
In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T17R, T27G, Q65M, T27A, M59E, M59S, R22H, K35N, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T17R, T27G, Q65M, T27A, M59E, M59S, R22H, K35N, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved selectivity for detecting erythromycin A in comparison to other polyketides. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from A16T, T154M, M155K, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence and an amino acid change selected from A16T, T154M, M155K, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved selectivity for detecting erythromycin A in comparison to structurally similar precursors. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from P4L, W107L, H193R, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting pikromycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change S106F.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting narbomycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from V33L, A34S, R51C, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting clarithromycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change R122T. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence and an amino acid change selected from R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof.
In one aspect, disclosed herein is a genetically modified host cell comprising: a nucleic acid encoding a genetically modified MphR gene sequence, wherein the nucleic acid comprises at least one genetic mutation when compared to the wild-type MphR gene sequence; and a reporter gene whose transcription is under the control of a promoter region which is regulated by the MphR transcription factor.
In one embodiment, the nucleic acid encoding the genetically modified MphR gene sequence and the reporter gene are located on one recombinant DNA vector.
In one embodiment, the nucleic acid encoding the genetically modified MphR gene sequence and the reporter gene are located on one recombinant DNA vector.
In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, beta-galactosidase, luciferase or green fluorescent protein (GFP). In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for green fluorescent protein (GFP). In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.
In one embodiment, the cell is E. coli. In one embodiment, the cell is Streptomyces. In one embodiment, the cell is Streptomyces venezuelae. In one embodiment, the cell is Saccharopolyspora erythraea.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the nucleotide sequence upstream of the ATG start codon of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of erythromycin A in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the ribosome binding site sequence of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of erythromycin A in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the MphR protein sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of erythromycin A in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the nucleotide sequence upstream of the ATG start codon of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of erythromycin A in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the ribosome binding site sequence of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of erythromycin A in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the MphR protein sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased selectivity for detection of erythromycin A in comparison to other polyketides.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the MphR protein sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased selectivity for detection of erythromycin A in comparison to structurally similar precursors.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the MphR protein sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of pikromycin in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the nucleotide sequence upstream of the ATG start codon of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of pikromycin in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the ribosome binding site sequence of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of pikromycin in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the MphR protein sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of narbomycin in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the nucleotide sequence upstream of the ATG start codon of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of narbomycin in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the ribosome binding site sequence of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of narbomycin in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the MphR protein sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of YC-17 in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the nucleotide sequence upstream of the ATG start codon of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of YC-17 in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In some embodiments, disclosed herein is a genetically modified MphR gene sequence comprising at least one mutation in the ribosome binding site sequence of the MphR gene sequence, wherein the mutation confers increased sensitivity for detection of YC-17 in comparison to the wild type MphR transcription factor.
In one aspect, disclosed herein is a biosensor system comprising:
In one aspect, disclosed herein is a genetically modified host cell comprising:
In one aspect, provided herein is a method for detecting a polyketide, comprising:
In one aspect, provided herein is a method of screening for genetic mutations in a target gene, comprising:
In one aspect, provided herein is a method for detecting a polyketide, comprising:
In one embodiment, the nucleic acid encoding the genetically modified MphR gene sequence and the reporter gene are located on one recombinant DNA vector.
In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, beta-galactosidase, luciferase or green fluorescent protein (GFP). In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for green fluorescent protein (GFP).
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting erythromycin A. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1G, A1T, A1C, G2T, G2A, A3C, A3G, A4T, G5T, G6T, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1G, A4T, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A1G nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence.
In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1T, G2T, A3C, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1C, G2T, A3G, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from G2A, G5T, or a combination thereof.
In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T17R, T27G, Q65M, T27A, M59E, M59S, R22H, K35N, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T17R, T27G, Q65M, T27A, M59E, M59S, R22H, K35N, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved selectivity for detecting erythromycin A in comparison to other polyketides. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from A16T, T154M, M155K, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence and an amino acid change selected from A16T, T154M, M155K, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved selectivity for detecting erythromycin A in comparison to structurally similar precursors. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from P4L, W107L, H193R, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting pikromycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change S106F.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting narbomycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from V33L, A34S, R51C, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting clarithromycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change R122T. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence and an amino acid change selected from R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof.
In one embodiment, the cell is E. coli. In one embodiment, the cell is Streptomyces. In one embodiment, the cell is Streptomyces venezuelae.
In one aspect, provided herein is a method of screening for genetic mutations in a target gene, comprising:
In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, beta-galactosidase, luciferase or green fluorescent protein (GFP). In one embodiment, the reporter gene is a gene coding for green fluorescent protein (GFP).
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting erythromycin A. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1G, A1T, A1C, G2T, G2A, A3C, A3G, A4T, G5T, G6T, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1G, A4T, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A1G nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence.
In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1T, G2T, A3C, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from A1C, G2T, A3G, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes a nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence selected from G2A, G5T, or a combination thereof.
In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T17R, T27G, Q65M, T27A, M59E, M59S, R22H, K35N, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T17R, T27G, Q65M, T27A, M59E, M59S, R22H, K35N, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved selectivity for detecting erythromycin A in comparison to other polyketides. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from A16T, T154M, M155K, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence and an amino acid change selected from A16T, T154M, M155K, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved selectivity for detecting erythromycin A in comparison to structurally similar precursors. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from P4L, W107L, H193R, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting pikromycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change S106F.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting narbomycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from V33L, A34S, R51C, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the MphR mutation confers improved sensitivity for detecting clarithromycin. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change R122T. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes an A4T nucleotide change in the ribosome binding site sequence and an amino acid change selected from R122T, K132N, A151T, H184Q, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the MphR genetic mutation encodes the amino acid change selected from T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D, or a combination thereof.
The following examples are set forth below to illustrate the systems, cells, methods, compositions and results according to the disclosed subject matter. These examples are not intended to be inclusive of all aspects of the subject matter disclosed herein, but rather to illustrate representative systems, cells, methods, compositions and results. These examples are not intended to exclude equivalents and variations of the present invention which are apparent to one skilled in the art.
The sensitivity of biosensors often requires tailoring to meet specific needs. For example, if a certain polyketide is expected to be found inside microbial cells at concentrations between 0 and 100 μM, then a biosensor is required that displays a linear detection response within the same range. The wild-type MphR gene was subjected to a directed evolution approach in order to identify MphR gene mutations and variants with improved sensitivity towards ErA. A library of MphR gene mutations and variants was created by error-prone PCR (epPCR). Because many mutations could lead to misfolded MphR variants or those that do not bind to the operator, flow cytometry was first used to remove variants that are always ‘ON’ in the absence of ligand. Next, individual ‘OFF’ variants were tested in wells of microplates to identify the variants most improved at low concentrations of ErA. Next, using promising individual variants, GFP fluorescence was measured in the presence of varying concentrations of erythromycin A (ErA) and the data was fit to the Hill equation to provide several parameters for describing selected MphR variants: dynamic range (GFPmax-GFPmin), K1/2 (ligand conc. resulting in half-maximal induction), cooperativity (Hill coefficient), linear range of detection, and Z′-factor (score of 0.50 indicates an excellent screen). Three variants (H4, A3, and E7) displayed improvements in sensitivity (
Additional mutations in the MphR gene sequence that provided increased sensitivity to erythromycin A (ErA) were also identified. The MphR macrolide resistance cassette operates as an analog converter of macrolide concentration to antibiotic resistance, as explained above and elsewhere ((Noguchi N, et al. Regulation of Transcription of the mph(A) Gene for Macrolide 2′-Phosphotransferase I in Escherichia Coli; Characterization of the Regulatory Gene mphR(A). Journal of Bacteriology. 2000; 182(18):5052-5058) (Zheng J, et al. Structure and Function of the Macrolide Biosensor Protein, MphR(A), With and Without Erythromycin. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2009; 387(5):1250-60). Refactoring the MphR cassette as a two plasmid system with a GFP reporter (Gardner L, et al. Photochemical Control of Bacterial Signal Processing Using a Light-activated Erythromycin. Molecular Biosystems. 2011; 7(9):2554-7) created a biosensor capable of detecting a range of macrolides. Previous literature reports various induction ranges for MphR-based biosensors depending on the plasmid construct. Church and coworkers reported Kin values of 22 and 97 μM erythromycin A for low and high copy number plasmids respectively, using a GFP reporter (Rogers, J. et al. 7648-7660 Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, Vol. 43, No. 15). Eberz and coworkers report an apparent induction range of 0 (min luminescence) to 20 (max luminescence) μM erythromycin A with an approximate half maximal induction at 10 μM using the LuxABCDE luminescence reporter system (Mohrle, V. et al. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007 July; 388(5-6):1117-25). In the experiments conducted herein, a previously reported MphR-based biosensor (MphR-WT) (Gardner L, et al. Photochemical Control of Bacterial Signal Processing Using a Light-activated Erythromycin. Molecular Biosystems. 2011; 7(9):2554-7) had a K1/2 of only 2.73 μM erythromycin A (Table 1) using a GFP reporter. Error-prone and multi-site saturation mutagenesis of the MphR gene was performed in order to improve sensitivity to erythromycin A.
Plasmid pMLGFP (See
The best performing clones from each library were selected for further analysis. Dose-response experiments revealed clones with improved performance features compared to MphR-WT for erythromycin A sensitivity (
In Table 1, Hill functions were used to derive biosensor transfer functions. K1/2 is the inducer concentration at half maximal induction. Cooperativity is derived from the Hill function to indicate cooperative ligand binding between protein monomers of the MphR dimer. Dynamic range is the GFP maximal response minus the minimum GFP response, which in all cases was the response with no ligand. The linear range of detection is the linear portion of the dose-response curve with a slope R2=0.95 or higher.
Importantly, several of these sensors have linear detection ranges capable of detecting titers of erythromycin A heterologously produced in shake-flask E. coli cultures. As this has remained a preferred method for the production of erythromycin A and erythromycin A derivatives resulting from precursor-directed mutasynthesis (Sundermann U, et al. Enzyme-directed Mutasynthesis: a Combined Experimental and Theoretical Approach to Substrate Recognition of a Polyketide Synthase. ACS Chemical Biology. 2013; 8(2): 443-50) or domain-swapping biosynthesis (Jiang M., Pfeifer, B. Metabolic and Pathway Engineering to Influence Native and Altered Erythromycin Production Through E. coli. Metabolic Engineering. 2013; 19:42-9), MphR biosensors can be used in high-throughput approaches to the continued improvement of heterologous erythromycin A biosynthetic engineering.
After further analysis of these clones, via DNA sequencing, the ribosome binding site (RBS) of A3 and E7 were found to be mutated, compared to the wild-type MphR sequence. Clone H4 also had mutations in other portions of the sequence and thus was omitted from further analysis here. This implicates the RBS mutations in these variants are responsible for sensitivity to erythromycin, rather than the amino acid changes identified. To confirm this, new versions of A3 and E7 were constructed that either only included the RBS mutations or the amino acids for each clone. Subsequent analysis revealed that the RBS mutations alone were responsible for the improvement in sensitivity to erythromycin (
The finding that mutations to the ribosome binding site (RBS) of clones A3 and E7 were responsible for modulating sensitivity prompted the inventors to make a dedicated library of RBS mutations to search for biosensors with improved sensitivities. Screening the “smRBS” library and analysis of the best performing clones revealed three clones (see below) with significantly improved sensitivity towards erythromycin. The best clone, smRBSA1, outperforms each mutant previously described (
In many cases, it is necessary to determine the presence and concentration of a given polyketide in the presence of other structurally related molecules. Accordingly, the selectivity of MphR requires tailoring towards target molecules. To test the capacity of random mutations to alter the ligand specificity of MphR, the initial goal was to find variants that were more selective with erythromycin A compared to clarithromycin, azithromycin, and roxithromycin. A library of MphR gene mutations and variants was created by error-prone PCR (epPCR) and flow cytometry was first used to remove variants that are always ‘ON’ in the absence of erythromycin A and the presence of clarithromycin and azithromycin. Next, individual ‘OFF’ variants were tested in wells of microplates to identify the variants most improved at low concentrations of erythromycin A. Thus, some of the ‘OFF’ library members were duplicated and each screened in the presence of erythromycin A or a mixture of clarithromycin, azithromycin, and roxithromycin. Several variants were not activated by clarithromycin, azithromycin, and roxithromycin but were strongly activated by erythromycin A (
To confirm previous reports of the broad inducer tolerance of the MphR biosensor (Eberz 2007), erythromycin A and several clinically useful semi-synthetic macrolides were screened versus MphR-WT. In liquid culture, dose-dependent MphR-WT activations for erythromycin A (compound 1), clarithromycin (compound 2), azithromycin (compound 3), and roxithromycin (compound 4) were obtained (
Clarithromycin is an erythromycin A semi-synthetic analog that differs by a single methoxy in place of a hydroxyl group at the C-6 carbon of the polyketide core macrolactone. Azithromycin is an erythromycin analog synthesized by an oxime-mediated nitrogen insertion and ring expansion at C-9 of the polyketide backbone. Roxithromycin replaces the C-9 ketone of erythromycin A with an imine-linked polyester. Clarithromycin, azithromycin and roxithromycin are semi-synthetic products of microbially produced erythromycin A. Distinction between erythromycin A and these modified analogs has thus far relied on inherently low-throughput techniques such as LC-MS, HPLC and NMR.
Biosensors capable of selective detection of specific macrolides from laboratory, industrial or environmental samples are useful in improving biotransformations, increasing final titers by detecting biosynthetic bottlenecks, and identifying macrolide contaminants.
Clone MphR-A16T/T154M/M155K (Clone M2D6) demonstrated exceptional selectivity for erythromycin A versus the three semi-synthetic analogs. Dose-response analysis revealed MphR-A16T/T154M/M155K maintained a K1/2 of 5.54 μM for erythromycin A, but displayed little to no activation by clarithromycin, azithromycin and roxithromycin. As summarized in Table 6 and
In Table 6, Compounds are numbered above their corresponding K1/2 value of each numbered compound (erythromycin A (1), clarithromycin (2), azithromycin (3) and roxithromycin (4)). MphR-A16T/T154M/M155K demonstrated much higher selectivity for erythromycin A versus its semi-synthetic counterparts compared to the wild-type biosensor.
MphR-A16T/T154M/M155K's ability to discriminate between closely related compounds that structurally differ by as little as a methyl substituent demonstrate the powerful application mutagenesis and high-throughput screen (HTS) have on developing tailored biosensors. Biosensors with specific ligand activation selectivities as demonstrated here are useful tools for monitoring reaction conversions in the production of erythromycin A analogs and in screening environmental samples for specific macrolide contaminants.
The RBS mutations from the erythromycin sensitive variant E7 were transferred to the MphR variant M2D6, which was previously engineering to be specific for erythromycin A. This new variant MphR M2D6-E7RBS displayed 2-fold enhanced sensitivity towards erythromycin A, but with negligible change in sensitivity towards semi-synthetic derivatives (analogues) (
The ability for MphR or MphR gene variants thereof to discriminate between closely related polyketides provides opportunities to report the activity of enzymes which catalyze the transformation of a polyketide not detected by MphR into a product that is detected by MphR. For example, MphR may specifically recognize the sugar residues attached to detected polyketides. Thus, MphR likely does not detect the corresponding aglycones. To test this, the aglycone 6-deoxyerythronolide B (6dEB) was produced via an engineered E. coli strain and purified by flash chromatography. The identity of the compound was confirmed by comparison of the 13C/1H-NMR spectral data to that published, by high-resolution mass analysis (6dEB calc. [M+Na]+ m/z=409.25664; 6dEB obs. [M+Na]+ m/z=409.25525), and by comparison to authentic biosynthetic and synthetic standards. Next, the ability of 6dEB to activate GFP expression under control of WT MphR was tested. As predicted, the aglycone failed to activate GFP expression, whereas the corresponding glycoside erythromycin A is a good activator (
The stringent substrate specificity of natural product glycosyltransferases (GTs) severely restricts the scope of polyketide glycodiversification strategies. Directed evolution is used to expand the specificity of macrolide GTs. The specificity of MphR towards desosaminylated macrolides can be leveraged as a sensor to report glycosylation and identify GT variants with improved activity and substrate specificity. Libraries of GT variants can be challenged with diverse substrates and screening via the MphR biosensor. By testing the function of many GT variants using MphR, potentially any GT can be engineered. These described methods can produce variant GTs with broad specificities beyond those originally screened for, the creation of new tools for glycoside synthesis and a new approach for engineering natural product GTs.
Anthracyclines (e.g. doxorubicin), enediynes (e.g. calicheamicin), avermectins (e.g. avermectin B1a), polyenes (nystatin A1), and perhaps most notably, macrolides are examples of glycosylated polyketides. The sugars of macrolide antibiotics such as erythromycin A are absolutely essential for the ability of macrolides to inhibit protein synthesis at the ribosome and the corresponding aglycone is not an effective antibiotic. In fact, altering the glycosylation pattern of macrolides can even change the biological activity from antimicrobial to anti-viral or anti-parasitic. Glycosylated polyketides have also been used as probes to perturb biological function. Classical chemical approaches for the synthesis of glycoconjugates are challenging since regio- and stereochemical control of glycosidic linkage formation requires multiple protection/deprotection steps, typically resulting in poor yields. On the other hand, biosynthetic approaches for glycoconjugate synthesis are an attractive alternative to traditional chemical synthesis, since enzymes are usually highly regio- and stereoselective and do not require complex protection strategies. Moreover, approaches that involve enzymes are particularly promising given the potential to produce multi-gram scale quantities of natural products via bacterial fermentation, at low cost, and with minimal use of organic solvents. Accordingly, biosynthetic pathways responsible for the synthesis of glycosylated polyketides have been intensively investigated as tools for the production of glycosides. Glycosylation, which is often rate limiting, is achieved through the transfer of a sugar moiety from an activated glycosyl-donor, usually in form of a nucleotide diphosphate (NDP)-sugar, and is catalyzed by glycosyltransferases (GTs) (
Erythromycin A is one of most widely prescribed macrolide antibiotics. Yet, its poor bioavailability and limited spectrum of activity have spurred tremendous efforts to alter the structure of erythromycin A and have resulted in the development of several generations of novel antibiotics. For example, the second generation macrolide antibiotic 6-O-methylerythromycin (clarithromycin,
For example, an O-methyltransferase (OMT) could afford clarithromycin in a single step from erythromycin A (
A genetic selection to identify OMT variants from large combinatorial libraries of OMT mutants can be used. Directed evolution and selections are known strategies for dramatically altering enzyme regio- and substrate specificity. The key challenge is that screening/selection methods with the requisite throughput or general applicability are not available for natural product OMTs. There are no reported ultra-high-throughput screens for methyltransferases. Most polyketides are not chromophores or fluorophores and don't offer a spectrophotometric change upon methylation that could be monitored. Moreover, methylation typically does not provide a suitable phenotype that can be leveraged for a screen or selection. Mass spectrometry is suitable for screening relatively small libraries of variants when the requisite instrumentation and expertise is available. Regardless, the ability of high-throughput mass spectrometry to quantify polyketides in complex mixtures and to distinguish congeners is unproven. Moreover, identification of suitable OMTs for the biosynthesis of clarithromycin might require the ability to screen hundreds of thousands of variants (if not more), a throughput that is well out of the range of liquid chromatography. To address this need, an MphR sensor is generated that is activated by clarithromycin but not erythromycin A. Given OMT libraries expressed in E. coli are fed with erythromycin A, and E. coli is not able to modify the structure of erythromycin A, the sensor must be selective for clarithromycin in the presence of erythromycin A, and the reporter MphR signal should be low (ideally zero) in the presence of erythromycin A.
Directed evolution has been used here to alter the ligand specificity of MphR. A library of MphR variants was created by error-prone PCR (epPCR). Reasoning that many mutations could lead to misfolded variants or those that do not bind to the operator, and that variants are required that are not activated by ErA, fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) was first used to remove those variants that were constitutively ‘ON’ in the presence of ErA. To test the capacity of random mutations to alter the ligand specificity of MphR, the initial goal was to find variants that were more selective with clarithromycin compared to erythromycin A. Thus, some of the ‘OFF’ library members were duplicated and each screened in the presence of clarithromycin and erythromycin A. Several variants were identified that showed higher GFP reporter signals in the presence of clarithromycin compared to erythromycin A. One particular clone, “M1B10” (comprising amino acid changes T49I, L89V, D98N, E109D) was selected for further analysis. GFP fluorescence was measured in the presence of varying concentrations of erythromycin A or clarithromycin (0.1-150 μM) and showed that the selectivity of this MphR variant was now shifted towards clarithromycin. For example, at 10 μM ligand, the fluorescence response with clarithromycin is 10-fold higher than with erythromycin A (
MphR M1B10 was replaced by the variant “M9C4.” MphR WT was subjected to structural-guided mutagenesis (R122T mutation), and error-prone PCR based on R122T mutation, yielding the variant “M9C4”. This variant is the most clarithromycin/erythromycin selective biosensor reported to date. At 10 μM ligand, the fluorescence response with clarithromycin is 29-fold higher than with erythromycin A. The RBS of the variant E7 was included (E7_M9C4), further improving sensitivity (
The objective here is to utilize MphR variants that recognize semi-synthetic polyketide analogues to identify enzymes for their chemo-enzymatic synthesis. MphR-based sensors can be used to identify and enrich novel polyketide tailoring enzymes by sensing the production of the desired product in vivo. An MphR variant specific for 6-O-methylerythromycin (clarithromycin) is generated and in vivo selections are performed to identify novel O-methyltransferases (OMTs) that enable the in vivo production of this valuable semi-synthetic derivative. Such enzymatic activity is difficult or impossible to identify without a genetically encoded biosensor and this approach could afford an array of other semi-synthetic derivatives.
Several candidate OMTs have been identified for directed evolution. EryG is a candidate given it already recognizes the desired substrate, albeit in a different conformation than required. EryG has been expressed in E. coli and displays some macrolide promiscuity. Given a crystal structure for EryG is not available, Phyre2 and I-TASSER were used to generate homology models. The conserved SAM-binding site was identified by Phyre2 and I-TASSER, while the putative macrolide-binding site were identified by comparison to known OMT sequences and acceptor-bound structures (
With a clarithromycin-sensor in place, approaches for the discovery of novel OMT activity using EryG, MycF, and DnrK as scaffolds can be pursued. epPCR libraries of these enzymes are generated in addition to multi-site saturation mutagenesis at residues lining each acceptor-binding pocket (
Once activity is isolated and sufficiently robust to achieve in vivo conversion, OMT variants are expressed and purified for biochemical characterization. A genetic selection could enrich OMTs that methylate the C6-OH of erythromycin A, but also other hydroxyl groups. Thus, HPLC-ELSD coupled with MS is used to determine if other products are present. However, other regiospecificities could prove useful sources of new products. Once regiospecificity of the OMT is established, full characterization (e.g. kcat, Km, stability) is determined by HPLC-ELSD, using erythromycin A, SAM, and clarithromycin as a product standard. Moreover, SAM-analogues are utilized to determine whether the evolved OMTs can be used to alkyl-diversify macrolides.
Cempra, Inc (Chapel Hill) have completed Phase III clinical trials for solithromycin and a New Drug Application (NDA) is in progress for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Solithromycin is chemically synthesized via a lengthy 19-step sequence of reactions (
Precursor I can be produced in an E. coli strain because: (1) a plasmid system for expressing entire polyketide gene clusters in E. coli can be used and have demonstrated erythromycin A production; (2) suitable E. coli strains for expression of the such genes including BAP1 can be used; and (3) the natural production host cannot provide the growth speed, technical amenability, and scalability offered by E. coli. Additionally, the necessary genetic manipulations in E. coli can be performed by those skilled in the art.
The artificial pathway is constructed in pieces via commercial gene synthesis, and inserted into E. coli BAP1. The prototype strain is tested by examining I in lysed cells and/or culture supernatant directly by LC-MS analysis. Notably, I is not toxic to E. coli. Subsequently, baseline I production, expected to be ˜1 mg/L culture broth, is determined by LC-MS. The MphR variant is capable of detecting I produced via the strain by measuring the GFP reporter signal. The unnatural DH/KR insertion (
Given the known polyketide product titers of in vivo systems, a sensor that can detect I in the linear range 0-100 μM, with a ˜50 μM K1/2 and fold-activation similar to WT MphR (with erythromycin A) is useful. Because the initial artificial pathway can produce I, albeit in poor yield, significant (e.g. >10-fold compared to initial strain) further mutations identified can provide critical proof-of-principle that biosensor-guided engineering is a viable alternative to traditional chemical synthesis of the precursor. Then, more elaborate libraries of variants can be generated and screened over multiple generations to furnish further mutations and improvements. Ultimately, product titers >1 g/L are typically needed for commercial viability of the production process.
The ability of the MphR clone “PikB1” to detect a Solithromycin biosynthetic intermediate (see structure below) was determined. This biosensor can detect the intermediate at concentrations as low as 0.1 μM (
Erythromycin A is a macrolide produced by the organized biosynthesis of type I polyketide synthase (PKS) and several late-stage tailoring enzymes. 6-Deoxyerythronolide B Synthase (DEBS) is organized as three giant polypeptides (DEBS1-3) that assemble the macrolactone 6-deoxyerythronolide B (6dEB). 6dEB is further tailored by P450 monooxygenases, glycosyltransferases, and a methyltransferase to yield the final product, erythromycin A (
Recently reported titers of one cell biosynthesis of erythromycin A in E. coli are ˜1 mg/L (Zhang H, et al. Complete Biosynthesis of Erythromycin A and Designed Analogs Using E. coli as a Heterologous Host. Cell Chemistry & Biology. 2010; 17(11):1232-40). The impressive coordination of 26 heterologous proteins to produce a foreign natural product notwithstanding, this yield can be seen as suboptimal, since the aglycone precursor, 6dEB, is routinely produced in E. coli shake-flask cultures exceeding 100 mg/L (Boghigian B A, et al. Multi-factorial Engineering of Heterologous Polyketide Production in Escherichia coli Reveals Complex Pathway Interactions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2011; 108(6): 1360-71). Rather than solely produce the single macrolide erythromycin A, heterologous biosynthesis results in mixtures of erythromycins A, B, C and D.
Typical erythromycin A biosynthesis occurs via the erythromycin C pathway. A P450 hydroxylation catalyzed by eryK converts erythromycin D to erythromycin C. Subsequently, the methyltransferase eryG catalyzes the S-adenosylmethione (SAM) dependent methylation of erythromycin C to yield erythromycin A. Erythromycin B is generally regarded as an undesired shunt product of a competing alternative pathway that reverses the order of hydroxylation and methylation of erythromycin D so that eryG methylation occurs first (Montemiglio, L C, et al. Redirecting P450 EryK Specificity by Rational Site-directed Mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 2013; 52 (21) 3678-87; Savino, C, et al. Investigating the Structural Plasticity of a Cytochrome P450: Three-dimensional Structures of P450 EryK and Binding to its Physiological Substrate. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009; 284 (42) 29170-9).
Biosensor guided screening of natural or heterologous erythromycin A biosynthesis would rely of the ability of the biosensors to report the true concentration of erythromycin A without falsely over-reporting yield due to off target activation by a late-stage biosynthetic intermediate. MphR-WT was assayed for its ability to detect the late-stage biosynthetic intermediates of erythromycin biosynthesis, erythromycins B and C. Compared to erythromycin A, erythromycins B and C activate MphR-WT in a nearly identical manner (
Successful application of the method above revealed MphR-P4L/W107L/H193R, a clone with enhanced erythromycin A selectivity versus erythromycin B. Compared to MphR-WT, MphR-P4L/W107L/H193R demonstrated no detectable or calculable activation by erythromycin B but retained significant erythromycin A sensitivity (
As seen in Tables 9 and 10, MphR-P4L/W107L/H193R displays a clear selectivity shift towards erythromycin A from B, while maintaining nearly the same performance features as the wild-type sensor, except dynamic range. MphR-P4L/W107L/H193R can be used as a biosensor capable of distinguishing erythromycin A from its structurally similar precursors. Sensors capable of HTS allow contemporary techniques that leverage giant library sizes to improve true erythromycin A titers. In addition to usefulness as an erythromycin A detector with less off-target activation, MphR-P4L/W107L/H193R also serves as a sensor for the detection of P450 monooxygenase eryK-catalyzed C-12 hydroxylation of erythromycin A's core. MphR-P4L/W107L/H193R and newly developed sensors of this type provide the tools necessary for high-throughput screening of late-stage tailoring enzymes in the erythromycin biosynthetic pathway.
A summary of non-limiting examples of MphR biosensor mutations is provided in Table 11 below. A number of the mutations were discussed in the examples above. Additional mutations are shown in Table 11 that provide increased pikromycin sensitivity. Further mutations are shown in Table 11 that improved narbomycin sensitivity.
Some of the mutations were further characterized for YC-17, narbomycin, and pikromycin selective MphR clones (
An erythromycin producing strain, Aeromicrobium erythreum (Reeves A R, et al. Engineering precursor flow for increased erythromycin production in Aeromicrobium erythreum. Metabolic Engineering. 2004; 6(4): 300-12; Miller E S, et al. Description of the erythromycin-producing bacterium Arthrobacter sp. strain NRRL B-3381 as Aeromicro-bium erythreum gen. nov., sp. Nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1991; 41: 363-368), and a knock-out mutant (KO) were grown in wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. Culture supernatants were removed and transferred to another microplate that contained cultures of either the MphR mutant E7-RBS or the wild-type biosensor. Fluorescence analysis revealed the unequivocal detection of only those wells containing the producing strain, and demonstrated the superior dynamic range of the engineered vs. wild-type biosensor (
A similar method using biosensor strains immobilized on agar plates reveals the sensitivity of the engineered biosensor and demonstrates the ability to screen culture collection supernatants in high-throughput via agar plates (
Wild-type (WT) MphR was used to control expression of the chloramphenicol (Cm) resistance gene via the plasmid pMLCmR (
A similar trend was observed when the engineered MphR E7-M9C4 was used in place of the wild-type MphR. However, using this clarithromycin-selective MphR variant, at 5 μM polyketide, colonies grew when clarithromycin was provided but not in the presence of erythromycin, thus highlighting the improved sensitivity of this mutant, in comparison to the wild-type biosensor (
GGTAGTGCTGAAGCGTTGCGGTCCCATAGAGTTCACGCTCAGCGGAGTAG
TGTAGTGCTGAAGCGTTGCGGTCCCATAGAGTTCACGCTCAGCGGAGTAG
TGTAGTGCTGAAGCGTTGCGGTCCCATAGAGTTCACGCTCAGCGGAGTAG
CCTTGCGATCCAGCGGAACCGCGCGGTGGTGGAGGGGATCCGCAAGCGAC
TGCGATACGCTGCTGGTGAGGATGATGGAGCGCGGCGTCGAGCAGGTGCG
ACTGGCGCGACGATGCAGTGGGCCGTCGATCCGGATGGTGAGCTAGCTGA
ACTGGCGCGACGATGCAGTGGGCCGTCGATCCGGATGGTGAGCTAGCTGA
Provided herein are the nucleic acid sequences for the plasmid vectors disclosed above:
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
G
GAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGA
T
GGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
TAATGCGATACCGATAGGCGCAGGGCCGCAAGGGCTCTGGGAATTTTTGCAGGTGC
G
GAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGA
T
GGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGG
CGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGGACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTTCTCGA
GGCAAAGGAGGTGGGGCTCTCCCGCGCAGCGTTAATCCAGCGCTTCACCAACCGCG
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCTCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGCGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
TTC
AGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
CTG
AGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
A
A
AAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGAAGGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
AGA
T
GGTGAACACTG CCCCGCCCCAAGCTCAAGTCCGATGACGAGGTACTCGA
In some embodiments, the MphR gene sequence may be codon optimized, without changing the resulting polypeptide sequence. In some embodiments, the codon optimization includes replacing at least one, or more than one, or a significant number, of codons.
In some embodiments, the MphR gene sequence is substantially identical to the wild-type MphR sequence (SEQ ID NO:1). In some embodiments, the MphR gene is about 60% identical, 35 preferably 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or higher, over a specified region when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence with the wild-type sequence.
In some embodiments, the MphR gene sequence is substantially identical to the wild-type MphR sequence (SEQ ID NO:28) (which includes gene sequences upstream of the start codon). In some embodiments, the MphR gene is about 60% identical, preferably 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or higher, over a specified region when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence with the wild-type sequence.
Throughout this application, various publications are referenced. The disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which this pertains. The references disclosed are also individually and specifically incorporated by reference herein for the material contained in them that is discussed in the sentence in which the reference is relied upon.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous changes and modifications can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention and that such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. It is, therefore, intended that the appended claims cover all such equivalent variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/099,749, filed Nov. 8, 2018, which is a national stage application filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/US2017/031962 filed May 10, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/334,204 filed May 10, 2016, the disclosures of which are is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with Government Support under Grant No. GM104258 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights to the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20040209270 | Eberz | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005033287 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2014158594 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014093402 | Jul 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pray, L. (2008) Eukaryotic genome complexity. Nature Education (Year: 2008). |
Zheng et al. Structure and Function of the Macrolide Biosensor Protein, MphR(A), with and without Erythromycin. J. Mol. Biol. (2009) 387, 1250-1260 (Year: 2009). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2017/031962. Mailed Aug. 17, 2017. 10 pages. |
Brakhage, Axel A. et al. Use of Reporter Genes to Identify Recessive trans-Acting Mutations Specifically Involved in the Regulation of Aspergillus nidulans Penicillin Biosynthesis Genes. Journal of Bacteriology, May 1995., p. 2781-2788. |
Feng, Tingting et al. Insights into Resistance Mechanism of the Macrolide Biosensor Protein MphR (A) Binding to Macrolide Antibiotic Erythromycin by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. J Comput Aided Mol Des, Aug. 6, 2015. 14 pages. |
Fu, Y et al. Study of Transcriptional Regulation Using a Reporter Gene Assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2006; 313:257-64. |
Altschul et al. (1977) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nuc. Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. |
Altschul et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410. |
Beaucage and Carruthers, Deoxynucleoside phosphoramidites—a new class of key intermediates for deoxypolynucleotide synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22:1859-1862. |
Boghigian BA, et al. Multi-factorial Engineering of Heterologous Polyketide Production in Escherichia coli Reveals Complex Pathway Interactions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2011; 108(6): 1360-71. |
Gardner L, et al. Photochemical Control of Bacterial Signal Processing Using a Light-activated Erythromycin. Molecular Biosystems. 2011;7(9):2554-7. |
Henikoff and Henikoff (1989) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915. |
Jiang M., Pfeifer, B. Metabolic and Pathway Engineering to Influence Native and Altered Erythromycin Production Through E. coli. Metabolic Engineering. 2013;19:42-9. |
Karlin and Altschul (1993) Applications and statistics for multiple high-scoring segments in molecular sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5873-5877. |
Matteucci, et al., Synthesis of deoxyoligonucleotides on a polymer support. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103:3185, 1981. |
Miller ES, et al. Description of the erythromycin—producing bacterium Arthrobacter sp. strain NRRL B-3381 as Aeromicro- bium erythreum gen. nov., sp. Nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1991;41: 363-368. |
Mohrle, V. et al. Biosensor-guided screening for macrolides. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. Jul. 2007;388(5-6):1117-25. |
Montemiglio, LC, et al. Redirecting P450 EryK Specificity by Rational Site-directed Mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 2013; 52(21) 3678-87. |
Noguchi N, et al. Regulation of Transcription of the mph(A) Gene for Macrolide 2′-Phosphotransferase I in Escherichia coli; Characterization of the Regulatory Gene mphR(A). Journal of Bacteriology. 2000; 182(18):5052-5058. |
Reeves AR, et al. Engineering precursor flow for increased erythromycin production in Aeromicrobium erythreum. Metabolic Engineering. 2004;6(4): 300-12. |
Rogers, J. et al., Synthetic biosensors for precise gene control and real-time monitoring of metabolites, Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, vol. 43, No. 15, 7648-7660. |
Savino, C, et al. Investigating the Structural Plasticity of a Cytochrome P450: Three-dimensional Structures of P450 EryK and Binding to its Physiological Substrate. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(42) 29170-9. |
Sundermann U, et al. Enzyme-directed Mutasynthesis: a Combined Experimental and Theoretical Approach to Substrate Recognition of a Polyketide Synthase. ACS Chemical Biology. 2013;8(2):443-50. |
Zhang H, et al. Complete Biosynthesis of Erythromycin A and Designed Analogs Using E. coli as a Heterologous Host. Cell Chemistry & Biology. 2010;17(11):1232-40. |
Zheng J, et al. Structure and Function of the Macrolide Biosensor Protein, MphR(A), With and Without Erythromycin. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2009;387(5):1250-60. |
Meinhardt, Sarah, et al. “Rheostats and toggle switches for modulating protein function.” PloS one 8.12 (2013): e83502. |
Miller, M., Y. Bromberg, and L. Swint-Kruse. “Computational predictors fail to identify amino acid substitution effects at rheostat positions.” Scientific reports 7.1 (2017): 41329. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230323481 A1 | Oct 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62334204 | May 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16099749 | US | |
Child | 18049805 | US |