The disclosure relates generally to building automation, and more particularly to building automation systems with geo-fencing capabilities.
Building automation systems are often used to control safety, security and/or comfort levels within a building or other structure. Illustrative but non-limiting examples of building automation systems include Heating, Ventilation and/or Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems, security systems, lighting systems, fire suppression systems and/or the like. In some cases, a building automation system may enter an unoccupied mode when the building is expected to be unoccupied and an occupied mode when the building is expected to be occupied. For example, when the building automation system includes an HVAC system, the building automation system may set a temperature set point of the HVAC system to a more energy efficient setting when in an unoccupied mode and a more comfortable setting when in an occupied mode. In another example, when the building automation system includes a security system, the building automation system may set the security system to a locked or away state when in an unoccupied mode and an unlocked or home state when in an occupied mode.
The present disclosure pertains generally to geo-fencing, and more particularly to improvements in the accuracy and robustness of geo-fencing. An example of the disclosure may be found in a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium with an executable program stored thereon. The executable program may instruct a mobile device having location services to store information pertaining to a geo-fence associated with the user of the mobile device and assigned to a particular building or location. The executable program may instruct the mobile device to identify a current location of the mobile device via location services, and store location data that includes the current location of the mobile device and one or more past locations of the mobile device. The executable program may instruct the mobile device to determine a current geo-fence state (e.g. inside the geo-fence or outside the geo-fence) of the mobile device based on the location data, sometimes in response to an internal stimuli or an external stimuli. The executable program may instruct the mobile device to notify a remote server of the current geo-fence state, sometimes automatically and/or on-demand.
Another example of the disclosure may be found in a building automation server for servicing a user's building. The building automation server may include an input for receiving a geo-fence state of one or more mobile devices, and an output for outputting a command to a building controller in the user's building. The building automation server may include a controller operably coupled to the input and the output. The controller may be configured to maintain a current geo-fence state for each of the one or more mobile devices based on the geo-fence state received from each of the one or more mobile devices. The controller may be further configured to output a command via the output to change a set point of the building controller to an energy saving set point upon detection that all of the one or more mobile devices associated with a building are in an outside geo-fence state, and to output a command via the output to change the set point of the building controller to a comfort set point upon detecting of all of the one or more mobile devices associated with the building are not in the outside geo-fence state. The controller may be further configured to not send a new command to change the set point of the building controller if the received geo-fence state of the one or more mobile devices associated with the building would not result in the controller outputting a different command than the previous command that was output by the controller by the controller.
Another example of the disclosure may be found in a mobile device having location services. The mobile device may include a user interface, a memory and a controller. The controller may be configured to check the location of the mobile device via the location services of the mobile device and to compare a current detected location relative to a stored geo-fence with a previously detected location relative to the stored geo-fence.
In some cases, the controller may check the location of the mobile device relative to the geo-fence from time to time, or in response to an internal stimuli. The internal stimuli may include, for example: detecting a restoration of a cellular service to the mobile device; detecting a restoration of an internet service to the mobile device; detecting a restoration of the location services of the mobile device; detecting a user logging into an executable program on the mobile device; detecting a wake up condition from a force close of an executable program on the mobile device; detecting the mobile device exiting an airplane mode; detecting a power on condition of the mobile device; detecting an updated geo-fence; detecting a new location and associated geo-fence; detecting that geo-fencing was turned on, and/or any other suitable internal stimuli.
In some cases, the controller may check the location of the mobile device relative to the geo-fence in response to an external stimuli. The external stimuli may include, for example: the mobile device being informed that a suspend mode of the geo-fence has been turned off at a remote location; the mobile device being informed that the geo-fence has been modified at a remote location; the mobile device being informed that another user has crossed the geo-fence; the mobile device being informed that the geo-fence state of another user has changed or that another user has turned geo-fencing on or off on their mobile device; the mobile device receiving a request for a current location from a remote location, and/or any other suitable external stimuli.
After checking the location of the mobile device, the controller may be configured to provide a remote server with the current detected location relative to the geo-fence if the current detected location relative to the geo-fence is different from the previously detected location relative to the geo-fence. The controller may be further configured to not provide the remote server with the current detected location relative to the geo-fence if the current detected location relative to the geo-fence is the same as the previously detected location relative to the geo-fence.
While the disclosure is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit aspects of the disclosure to the particular illustrative embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
The following description should be read with reference to the drawings wherein like reference numerals indicate like elements. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. In some of the figures, elements not believed necessary to an understanding of relationships among illustrated components may have been omitted for clarity.
All numbers are herein assumed to be modified by the term “about”, unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers subsumed within that range (e.g., 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 2, 2.75, 3, 3.80, 4, and 5).
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include the plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
It is noted that references in the specification to “an embodiment”, “some embodiments”, “other embodiments”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is contemplated that the feature, structure, or characteristic may be applied to other embodiments whether or not explicitly described unless clearly stated to the contrary.
The present disclosure is directed generally at building automation systems. Building automation systems are systems that control one or more operations of a building. Building automation systems can include HVAC systems, security systems, fire suppression systems, energy management systems and/or any other suitable systems. While HVAC systems are used as an example below, it should be recognized that the concepts disclosed herein can be applied to building control systems more generally.
A building automation system may include a controller, computer and/or other processing equipment that is configured to control one or more features, functions, systems or sub-systems of a building. In some cases, devices that can be used by individuals to communicate with the controller, computer and/or other processing equipment. In some cases, a building automation system may include a plurality of components that, in combination, perform or otherwise provide the functionality of the building automation system. A building automation system may be fully contained within a single building, or may include components that are spread between multiple housings and/or across multiple locations. In some embodiments, a building automation system, regardless of the physical location(s) of the components within the building automation system, may control one or more building systems within a single building. In some cases, a building automation system, regardless of the physical location(s) of the components within the building automation system, may control one or more building systems within a plurality of buildings, optionally in accordance with a common operating procedure and/or distinct operating procedures for each building as desired.
In some cases, the mobile devices 14 may communicate with the server 12 at least partially through a network such as the Internet, sometimes using a cell phone network, WiFi network and/or any other suitable network. Likewise, it is contemplated that the building controller 16 may communicate with the server 12 at least partially through a network such as the Internet, sometimes using a cell phone network, WiFi network and/or any other suitable network.
It will be appreciated that for simplicity, only a single mobile device 14 is shown, while in many cases the first server 22 may be configured to communicate directly or indirectly with any number of mobile devices 14. Similarly, while a single building controller 16 is illustrated, in many cases the second server 24 may be configured to communicate directly or indirectly with any number of building controllers 16, located in a single building or distributed throughout a plurality of buildings.
The first server 22 is illustrated as a single, cloud-based server. In some cases, the first server 22 may be a single server. In some instances, the first server 22 may generically represent two, three or more servers commonly located or spread between two or more physical locations. The second server 24 is illustrated as a single, cloud-based server. In some cases, the second server 24 may be a single server. In some instances, the second server 24 may generically represent two, three or more servers commonly located or spread between two or more physical locations. In some cases, the first server 22 and the second server 24 may, in combination, be considered as representing or forming a building automation server 26.
As illustrated, each of the plurality of buildings 32 includes a building controller and one or more pieces of building equipment. The building equipment may, for example, be HVAC equipment, security equipment, lighting equipment, fire suppression equipment, and/or the like. In particular, the building 32A includes a building controller 36A and building equipment 38A, the building 32B includes a building controller 36B and building equipment 38B, and so on through the building 32N, which includes a building controller 36N and building equipment 38N. It will be appreciated that while each building is illustrated as having a single building controller and single building equipment controlled by the single building controller, in some cases a building may have multiple related or unrelated building controllers and/or multiple pieces of related or unrelated building equipment.
The plurality of mobile devices 34 may be considered as being divided into a set of mobile devices each associated with a corresponding building. In the example shown, the plurality of mobile devices 34 may be considered as being divided into a set of mobile devices 40A that are associated with the building 32A, a set of mobile devices 40B that are associated with the building 32B, and so on through a set of mobile devices 40N that are associated with the building 32N. As illustrated, the set of mobile devices 40A includes a first mobile device 42A, a second mobile device 44A and a third mobile device 46A. The set of mobile devices 40B includes a first mobile device 42B, a second mobile device 44B and a third mobile device 46B and so on through the set of mobile devices 40N, which includes a first mobile device 42N, a second mobile device 44N and a third mobile device 46N. This is merely illustrative, as any number of mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets, may be associated with a particular building, as desired. Each user or occupant of a building may have an associated mobile device, or may have several associated mobile devices. In some cases, a user or occupant may have a mobile device associated with several different locations such as a home, a cabin or a place of work.
Associating a mobile device with a particular building generally involves the individual who uses the particular mobile device. In the example shown in
In some instances, the building automation server 26 may be configured to maintain a current geo-fence state for each of the one or more mobile devices 14 based on the geo-fence state received from each of the one or more mobile devices. In some cases, the geo-fence state for each of the one or more mobile devices 14, the association between each of the mobile devices and corresponding buildings and as well as other information may be stored in a database that is part of or accessible by the building automation server 26. Example non-limiting databases include MySQL, PostgreSQL, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, Sybase and IBM DB2.
When the building controller is an HVAC controller, the controller 54 may be configured to output a command via the output 52 to change a set point of the building controller to an energy saving set point when the controller 54 detects that the current geo-fence state of all of the one or more mobile devices 14 associated with the building are in the outside geo-fence state. In some cases, the controller 54 may be configured to output a command via the output 52 to change the set point of the building controller to a comfort set point upon detecting that the current geo-fence state of all of the one or more mobile devices 14 associated with the building are not in the outside geo-fence state, i.e., one or more of the mobile devices 14 are in the inside geo-fence state.
In some instances, the controller 54 is configured to not send a new command, such as to change the set point of the building controller, if the received geo-fence state of the one or more mobile devices 14 would not result in a different command being output. For example, if the current geo-fence state of all of the one or more mobile devices 14 were in the outside geo-fence state, with the controller 54 aware of the status of each of the one or more mobile devices 14, and the controller 54 receives an outside geo-fence state from one of the one or mobile devices 14, the controller 54 may be configured to not send a command to the building controller as there is nothing to change. In some cases, the controller 54 will only send a command to the building controller when there is something to change.
In some instances, the controller 54 may be configured to solicit location information from one or more of the mobile devices. For example, the controller 54 may be configured to solicit location information from a particular mobile device 14 if, for example, the controller 54 has not received a geo-fence state for the particular mobile device 14 for a predetermined length of time. In some cases, the controller 54 may solicit location information from a particular mobile device 14 if the controller 54 has not received any location information from that mobile device 14 for a period of time such as one hour, two hours, three hours, four hours, six hours, twelve hours, twenty-four hours, or more or less.
In some cases, the controller 54 may be configured to solicit location information from a particular mobile device 14, or perhaps from each of the one or more mobile devices 14 on a regular, repeating schedule of any desired frequency. In some embodiments, however, the controller 54 may be configured to solicit location information from a particular mobile device 14 at an increased frequency if a geo-fence crossing by the particular mobile device 14 is anticipated. For example, if the controller 54 learns from history that a particular user tends to cross a geo-fence on their way home every weekday between 5 pm and 6 pm, the controller 54 may solicit location information on a more frequent basis each weekday between 5 pm and 6 pm, or perhaps between 4:30 pm and 6:30 pm, or perhaps from 4:30 pm to until a crossing is detected.
In some cases, the controller 54 may be configured to solicit location information of a higher accuracy level from a particular mobile device 14 if a geo-fence crossing by the particular mobile device 14 is anticipated. For example, a low accuracy level request from the controller 54 may cause the mobile device 14 to rely on cell signal strength, triangulation, and/or other option lower power than GPS. Conversely, a high accuracy level request may cause the mobile device 14 to rely on a more accurate but more power-hungry location service such as GPS. In some cases, the controller 54 may be configured to send one of the mobile devices 14 a request to temporarily turn on GPS functionality within the mobile device and to return a GPS location to the controller 54. In some instances, the mobile device may instead return the geo-fence state (in or out) to the controller 54. In some cases, each of the one or more mobile devices 14 do not send an updated geo-fence state to the input 50 unless the geo-fence state of the corresponding mobile device 14 changes. In some instances, each of the one or more mobile devices 14 may send an updated geo-fence state to the input 50 when the geo-fence state of the corresponding mobile device 14 changes.
In some instances, the controller 60 is configured to check the location of the mobile device relative to the geo-fence from time to time. For example, the controller 60 may check the location of the mobile device each hour or each half hour. In some cases, the controller 60 may check the location of the mobile device relative to the geo-fence in response to an internal stimuli or an external stimuli. A variety of different internal and external stimuli are contemplated. Illustrative but non-limiting examples of internal stimuli include the mobile device 14 detecting a restoration of cellular service and/or a restoration of internet service to the mobile device 14. In some cases, if there is a loss in cellular service or internet service, the mobile device 14 is unable to transmit its geo-fence status. When service is restored, the mobile device 14 can go ahead and transmit its geo-fence status. In some cases, the mobile device 14 may first update its geo-fence status before transmitting its geo-fence status.
Another example internal stimuli may include restoration of the location services of the mobile device 14. If location services has been turned off, either accidently or intentionally, the mobile device 14 will be unable to determine its location. When this is discovered, or the user otherwise turns location services back on, the mobile device 14 may check its location and report its geo-fence status to the remote server 26.
In some cases, if a user is talking on the mobile device 14 during a geo-fence crossing, the mobile device 14 may not be able to report the crossing until after the phone call. In such a case, the mobile device 14 may repeatedly attempt to report the crossing until the crossing is successfully reported or a time limit is reached. In some cases, the time limit is a span of time that begins with termination of the phone call. If attempts to report the crossing repeatedly fail, the user may be informed of this via the user interface 56. For example, if the mobile device 14 is an Android device, and an initial communication attempt with the building automation server 26 fails, the mobile device 14 may try again in thirty seconds, then in one minute, then in two minutes, then in four minutes, then in eight minutes, and then again in thirty minutes. It will be appreciated that these time spans are merely illustrative.
In some instances, the mobile device 14 includes an executable program stored in the memory 58 that governs and controls some of the communication with the building automation server 26. Another example of an internal stimuli is detecting a user logging in to the executable program. This may be a physical login, in which the user enters user name and password, or it may be an auto-login utilizing stored user name and password information. Another example is detecting a wake up condition from a force close of the executable program. The user switching off airplane mode, and powering on the mobile device 14, are other examples of internal stimuli. If the mobile device 14 detects an updated geo-fence, or detects a new location and associated geo-fence, the mobile device 14 may also treat these as internal stimuli.
In some cases, if the executable program detects that the mobile device 14 is in a state in which the mobile device 14 is not able to detect a geo-fence crossing, the executable program may notify the user via the user interface 56 that there is a problem. In some cases, the executable program may also inform the user how to correct the problem. It may, for example, be as simple as turning on location services, or turning geo-fencing on, or exiting airplane mode. In some embodiments, it is contemplated that if possible, the executable program may itself modify settings within the mobile device 14 to correct the problem, perhaps with a notification to the user that an automatic setting change was made.
There are a number of illustrative but non-limiting examples of external stimuli that may cause the controller 60 to check the location of the mobile device relative to the geo-fence. For example, the controller 60 may check the location of the mobile device in response to being informed that a suspend mode of the geo-fence has been turned off at a remote location, such as at a particular building controller, or that another user has turned their geo-fencing on or off. In some embodiments, there may be a desire to instruct the building controller to operate manually (e.g. without geo-fencing), at least for a period of time. While operating manually, the building controller may operate one or more building systems to maintain a particular temperature set point or schedule, a lighting mode, a security system mode, and the like. While operating manually, the building controller may ignore any geo-fence events and/or geo-fence related commands from a building automation server 26. In some instances, the building automation server 26 may keep track of geo-fence events that occur during a period of manual operation resulting from an individual triggering a suspend mode using either the building controller or their mobile device. While geo-fence events may not be transmitted to the building controller, or may be transmitted to the building controller but ignored by the building controller, the building automation server 26 may still use those triggers to update the status of each assigned user.
Other examples of external stimuli may include geo-fencing changes and/or geo-fence events of other users. For example, the mobile device 14 may be informed that the geo-fence has been modified at a remote location, or that another user associated with the building has crossed the geo-fence, or that the geo-fence status of another user has changed. Each of these may be considered external stimuli. Another external stimuli may be the mobile device receiving a request for current location from a remote location, such as the building automation server 26.
As generally indicated at block 76, a current geo-fence state of the mobile device 14 is determined based on the location data in response to an internal stimuli or an external stimuli, wherein the geo-fence state is selected from at least an inside geo-fence state in which the mobile device 14 is deemed to be inside the geo-fence and an outside geo-fence state in which the mobile device 14 is deemed to be outside of the geo-fence. The internal stimuli and external stimuli may be the same as those discussed with respect to
As generally indicated at block 76, a current geo-fence state of the mobile device 14 is determined based on the location data in response to an internal stimuli or an external stimuli, wherein the geo-fence state is selected from at least an inside geo-fence state in which the mobile device 14 is deemed to be inside the geo-fence and an outside geo-fence state in which the mobile device 14 is deemed to be outside of the geo-fence. A remote server, such as the building automation server 26, is notified of the current geo-fence state, as seen at block 78. In some cases, as generally indicated at block 80, a determination may be made as to whether the mobile device 14 has crossed the geo-fence by referencing the geo-fence status over time. In some embodiments, as seen at block 82, the remote server may be notified that the mobile device 14 has crossed the geo-fence if such a determination was made at block 80.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present disclosure may be manifested in a variety of forms other than the specific embodiments described and contemplated herein. Accordingly, departure in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure as described in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/668,800, filed Mar. 25, 2015, entitled, “GEO-FENCING IN A BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6255988 | Bischoff | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6356282 | Roytman et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6400956 | Richton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6478233 | Shah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6529137 | Roe | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6604023 | Brown et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6665613 | Duvall | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6909891 | Yamashita et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6990335 | Shamoon et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7083109 | Pouchak | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127734 | Amit | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130719 | Ehlers et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155305 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
D535573 | Barton et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
7159789 | Schwendinger et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7257397 | Shamoon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7327250 | Harvey | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7385500 | Irwin | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D580801 | Takach et al. | Nov 2008 | S |
7451017 | McNally | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510126 | Rossi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7571865 | Nicodem et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7614567 | Chapman, Jr. et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636604 | Bergman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668532 | Shamoon et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7768393 | Nigam | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801646 | Amundson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7812274 | Dupont et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7839275 | Spalink et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7908211 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7949615 | Ehlers et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7953518 | Kansal et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7973678 | Petricoin, Jr. et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8018329 | Morgan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8064935 | Shamoon et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065342 | Borg et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8095340 | Brown | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8125332 | Curran et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8180492 | Steinberg | May 2012 | B2 |
8195313 | Fadell et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8205244 | Nightingale et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8232877 | Husain | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255090 | Frader-Thompson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8269620 | Bullemer et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280536 | Fadell et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8301765 | Goodman | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8332055 | Veillette | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8350697 | Trundle et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8386082 | Oswald | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390473 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412381 | Nikovski et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8412654 | Montalvo | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8428867 | Ashley, Jr. et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433344 | Virga | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8442695 | Imes et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457797 | Imes et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8509954 | Imes et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8531294 | Slavin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8554374 | Lunacek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8554714 | Raymond et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560127 | Leen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571518 | Imes et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8587445 | Rockwell | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8620841 | Filson et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8626344 | Imes et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630741 | Matsuoka et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8648706 | Ranjun et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8670783 | Klein | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8686841 | Macheca et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718826 | Ramachandran et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8798804 | Besore et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8810454 | Cosman | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812024 | Obermeyer et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812027 | Obermeyer et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8840033 | Steinberg | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8874129 | Forutanpour et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8886178 | Chatterjee | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8890675 | Ranjan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8909256 | Fraccaroli | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918219 | Sloo et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8941489 | Sheshadri et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8965401 | Sheshadri et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8965406 | Henderson | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9026261 | Bukhin et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9033255 | Tessier et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9055475 | Lacatus et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9071453 | Shoemaker et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9113298 | Qiu | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9167381 | McDonald et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168927 | Louboutin | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9183530 | Schwarz et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9210545 | Sabatelli et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9215560 | Jernigan | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9219983 | Sheshadri et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9247378 | Bisson et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9280559 | Jones | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9288620 | Menendez | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9307344 | Rucker et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9311685 | Harkey et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9313320 | Zeilingold et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9363638 | Jones | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9363772 | Burks | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396344 | Jones | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9414422 | Belghoul et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9433681 | Constien et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9449491 | Sager et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9491577 | Jones | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9589435 | Finlow-Bates | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9635500 | Becker et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9645589 | Leen et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
20020147006 | Coon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050172056 | Ahn | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060063522 | McFarland | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097063 | Zeevi | May 2006 | A1 |
20070037605 | Logan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070099626 | Lawrence et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114295 | Jenkins | May 2007 | A1 |
20070249319 | Faulkner et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080094230 | Mock et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090075677 | Seger | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090309709 | Bevacqua et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034386 | Choong et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042940 | Monday et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100081375 | Rosenblatt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100127854 | Helvick et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100156628 | Ainsbury et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100203901 | Dinoff | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100261465 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110153525 | Benco et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120172027 | Partheesh et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191257 | Corcoran et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209730 | Garrett | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120259466 | Ray et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120284769 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130073094 | Knapton et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130204441 | Sloo et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225196 | James et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231137 | Hugie et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130310053 | Srivastava et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318217 | Imes et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331087 | Shoemaker et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140031989 | Bergman et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031991 | Bergman et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140100835 | Majumdar et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140156087 | Amundson | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140162692 | Li et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164118 | Polachi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172176 | Deilmann et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140200718 | Tessier | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140244048 | Ramachandran et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140266635 | Roth et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277762 | Drew | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140302879 | Kim et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330435 | Stoner et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337123 | Nuernberg et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140349672 | Kem, Jr. et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140370911 | Gorgenyi et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150065161 | Ganesh et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150094860 | Finnerty et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150140994 | Partheesh et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150141045 | Qiu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150159895 | Quam et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150163631 | Quam et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150163945 | Barton et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186497 | Patton et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150237470 | Mayor et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150271638 | Menayas et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150301543 | Janoso et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150338116 | Furuta et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150370272 | Reddy et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150372832 | Kortz et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160007156 | Chiou et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160054865 | Kerr et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057572 | Bojorquez Alfaro et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160142872 | Nicholson et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160223998 | Songkakul et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170026506 | Haepp et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103175287 | Jun 2013 | CN |
104704863 | Jun 2015 | CN |
105318499 | Feb 2016 | CN |
102013226390 | Jun 2015 | DE |
1515289 | Mar 2005 | EP |
2607802 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2675195 | Dec 2013 | EP |
3001116 | Mar 2016 | EP |
2011203841 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012109680 | Jun 2012 | JP |
2012000906 | Sep 2012 | MX |
2006055334 | May 2006 | WO |
2009034720 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009036764 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009067251 | May 2009 | WO |
2011011404 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011121299 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012000107 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012068517 | May 2012 | WO |
2013170791 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014016705 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014047501 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014055939 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014144323 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014197320 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2014200524 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015047739 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015089116 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015164400 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/696,662, filed Apr. 27, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/696,725, filed Apr. 27, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/933,948, filed Nov. 5, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/934,543, filed Nov. 6, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/938,595, filed Nov. 11, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/938,642, filed Nov. 11, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/964,264, filed Dec. 9, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/964,349, filed Dec. 9, 2015. |
Balaji et al., “Sentinel: Occupancy Based HVAC Actuation Using Existing WiFi Infrastructure Within Commercial Buildings,” SenSys T3, 14 pages, Nov. 11-15, 2015. |
“Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,571,518 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 311-319, 37 CFR 42,” Inventor Imes et al., dated Oct. 29, 2014. |
Do, “Programmable Communicating Thermostats for Demand Response in California,” DR ETD Workshop, 26 pages, Jun. 11, 2007. |
Green, “PM's Thermostat Guide,” Popular Mechanics, pp. 155-158, Oct. 1985. |
Gupta et al., “Adding GPS-Control to Traditional Thermostats: An Exploration of Potential Energy Savings and Design Challenges,” Pervasive, LNCS 5538, pp. 95-114, 2009. |
Gupta, “A Persuasive GPS-Controlled Thermostat System,” 89 pages, Sep. 2008. |
http://community.lockitron.com/notifications-geofencing-scheduling-sense-bluetooth/633, “Lockitron Community, Notifications, Geofencing Scheduling, Sense/Bluetooth,” 14 pages, printed Oct. 29, 2014. |
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14232712/tracking-multiple20-locations-with-ios-geofencing, “Tracking Multiple (20+) Locations with iOS Geofencing—Stack Overflow,” 2 pages, printed Oct. 29, 2014. |
http://www.allure-energy.com/aenfjan9_12.html, “CES Gets First Look at EverSense,” Allure Energy, 2 pages, printed Feb. 17, 2015. |
http:/IWww.prnev.tswire.com/nev.ts-releases/allure-energy-unveils-a-combination-of-ibeacon-and-nfc-enabled-smart-sensortechnology-known-as-aura-23885 . . . , “Allure Energy Unveils a Combination of iBeacon and NFC Enabled Smart Sensor Technology Known as Aura,” 6 pages, Jan. 6, 2014. |
Mobile Integrated Solutions, LLC, “MobiLinc Take Control ofYour Home, MobiLinc and Geo-Fence Awareness,” 9 pages, downloaded Mar. 27, 2015. |
Pan et al., “A Framework for Smart Location-Based Automated Energy Controls in a Green Building Testbed,” 6 pages, downloaded Jan. 30, 2015. |
SmartThings Inc., “2 Ecobee Si Thermostat + Geofencing,” 17 pages, downloaded Nov. 3, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/048,902, filed Feb. 19, 2016. |
The Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EP Application No. 16156760.7-1862, dated Jul. 8, 2016. |
The Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 1619416, dated Feb. 2, 2017. |
The Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 16196128.9, dated Mar. 7, 2017. |
Gentec, “Feature Focus, Threat Level Management,” 2 pages, 2013. Scanlon et al., “Mutual Information Based Visual Feature Selection for Lipreading,” 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 5 pages, Oct. 4-8, 2004. |
Transportation Research Board ofthe National Academies, “Commuting in America III, the Third National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends” 199 pages, 2006. |
Allure Energy, “Our Technology,” http://www.allure-energy.com/pages/about.jsp 1 page, printed May 30, 2012. |
The Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 16195639.6, dated May 31, 2017. |
The International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/042589 dated Nov. 22, 2010. |
Mozer, “The Neural Network House: An Environment that Adapts to Its Inhabitants,” Department ofComputer Science, University of Colorado, 5 pages, downloaded May 29, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180219994 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14668800 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15933134 | US |