1. Field of Invention
This invention relates in general to particle movement control and, in particular, to a fence for precipitating, depositing, and accumulating matter moved by wind currents to protect roads and facilities from sand encroachment.
2. Description of Related Art
Control of particulate matter, such as sand, is a major concern in many areas of the world. Over one-third of Saudi Arabia, for example, is covered by sand, which has hundreds of sand storms, annually. Facilities, wellsites and roads located in these desert areas suffer from sand accumulation caused by these movements. Over time, sand dunes and sand sheets accumulate, requiring costly excavation procedures.
There are a number of solutions employed to try to prevent such sand accumulation. These solutions include, for example, oil and chemical stabilization, vegetation, barrier fences, and wood slat or fabric sand fences. The concept of a “sand fence” is to reduce the wind speed as it passes through the fence, thereby causing the wind to deposit the sand load around the fence. This is in contrast to other types of fences, such as barrier-type fences, which are typically used to form a barrier to prevent sand or soil migration. The wood slat and fabric “sand fences” are placed at a distance from the facility to be protected, and the deposited sand accumulates at the fence location, thus reducing the amount of sand reaching the facility.
There are a number of disadvantages to the currently used methods. Oil and chemical stabilization will only hold the sand underneath the surface and will not stop it from traveling over the top of the surface. Vegetation typically requires at least two years to become permanently established, requires irrigation, and may be eaten by desert animals. Barrier-type fences, by their nature, quickly become buried, thus rendering them ineffective. Wood slat and fabric “sand fences” are not durable, are susceptible to damage and theft, and are very hard to repair. Further, due to structural and environmental limitations, the wood slat and fabric “sand fences” generally have a maximum height of approximately one meter, and cannot be extended in height. Accordingly, although not as quickly as barrier-type fences, the wood slat and fabric “sand fences” are, nevertheless, often relatively quickly buried by the sand over time, thus rendering them ineffective. This results in a requirement to either excavate the sand or install a replacement “sand fence.” Further, although studies conducted by the inventors revealed that sand moved by wind currents that is subject to being accumulated through use of a sand fence, only extends from between the zero level and about the two meter level, as noted above, such conventional “sand fences” extend only up to approximately one meter, and thus, allow a great deal of sand to be moved, unimpeded, over the top of the conventional “sand fence.” Additionally, the wood needed to build the wood slat “sand fences” often must be imported, or is not otherwise locally available.
Accordingly, recognized by the inventors is a need for a higher, more durable sand fence, configured to maximize both fence service life and sand accumulation volume, that is easy to manufacture, transport, and install, that has low maintenance requirements and is easy to repair, that has material specifications and construction procedures that are easy to standardize, and that does not require extensive material importation.
In view of the foregoing, embodiments of the present invention provide a sand fence/apparatus and methods to control sand or other particulate matter movement, to protect roads and other facilities from such encroachment. Embodiments of the present invention provide a sand fence made of an ultraviolet light resistant High Density Polyethylene geogrid mesh polymer material, which is durable, easy to repair, and easy to standardize, and which can be positioned to minimize the safety hazards and costs associated with mechanical sand excavation procedures. The polymer material, according to various embodiments of the present invention, has a plurality of apertures therein sized, shaped, and distributed to provide a porosity, for example, of approximately 50%, which was found through testing to maximize sand deposit volume and distribution. A 50% porosity and circular opening, for example, was found to provide gentle slowing down of wind velocity so that sand load carried by the wind will drop on the leeward of the sand fence.
According to various embodiments of the present invention, the height of the sand fence can also be substantially taller than conventional sand fences to maximize control of sand movement, which can be adjusted in response to sand accumulation in order to further and continuously maximize control of sand movement. According to embodiments of the present invention, the combination of porosity, aperture shape, height, structural weight, and structural composition of the sand fence can beneficially provide a sand fence having optimal sand movement control and accumulation, particularly on the leeward side of the fence.
Specifically, a sand fence for depositing sand particles moved by wind currents, according to an embodiment of the present invention, can include a plurality of support members to secure the sand fence to a surface. The plurality of support members can be positioned to extend downward into the surface a first preselected distance, and positioned to extend upwardly from the surface a second preselected distance. The plurality of support members can include at least two end post members and at least two, but typically a multitude of, intermediate post members. A set of four or so tensioning wires can extend between each pair of adjacent intermediate post members to enhance strength and stability. The sand fence can also include a fencing material attached to the plurality of support members and/or tensioning wires. The fencing material can include a flexible high density polyethylene geogrid mesh having a porosity in a range of between approximately 40% and 60% (e.g., 50%) and having a plurality of e.g., circular, apertures each having a diameter in the range of between, for example, approximately 6 mm and 10 mm, and positioned so that the sand fence gently reduces a speed of the wind currents as the wind currents move through the fencing material such that sand accumulation on a leeward side of the sand fence is substantially optimized. The High Density Polyethylene geogrid mesh can include approximately 2% finely divided carbon black, for example, to enhance the durability of the material. In order to help prevent buildup on the windward side of the sand fence, the fencing material can be suspended above the surface in a range of between approximately 10 cm and 20 cm, for example.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a sand fence for depositing sand particles moved by wind currents can include a fencing material including a flexible polymer having a height of approximately 2 meters and having a plurality of apertures sized and distributed so that the flexible polymer has a porosity of approximately 50% to reduce a speed of the wind currents as the wind currents move through the fencing material. The combination of porosity and height of the flexible polymer advantageously can result in the optimization of sand particle accumulation on a leeward side of the sand fence. The apertures are preferably circular, with diameters in the range of approximately 6 mm to 10 mm. The flexible polymer can include a High Density Polyethylene geogrid mesh to provide sufficient strength and durability.
Embodiments of the present invention also include methods of depositing matter moved by wind currents. A method, for example, can include the step of securing a plurality of support members to a surface at a preselected offset distance from a facility to be protected. This step can include positioning the plurality of support members to extend downward into the surface a first preselected distance and extend upwardly from the surface a second preselected distance. The method can also include the steps of connecting a set of at least three, but preferably four, tensioning wires between adjacent pairs of support members, and attaching a polymer fencing material to the plurality of support members to thereby form a fence. The polymer fencing material has a height in a range of between approximately 1.5 meters to 2.5 meters (e.g. 2.0 meters) and has a plurality of apertures that result in a fencing material porosity in a range of between 40% to 60%, and more preferably between approximately 45% to 55%, to reduce a speed of the wind currents as the wind currents move through the fencing material, to thereby control between approximately 80% and 90% of moving particulate matter moving responsive to the wind currents, and thus, maximizing particulate matter precipitation and accumulation on a leeward side of the fence prior to the wind currents reaching the facility to be protected. The method can include the step of adjusting a height of the fence so that the height is increased responsive to particulate matter accumulation to thereby maintain maximized particulate matter accumulation. This step can include the steps of connecting a separate one of a plurality of extension members to an extension connector positioned at an upper end portion of each separate one of the plurality of support members, connecting a set of at least two tensioning wires between adjacent pairs of extension members, and attaching additional polymer fencing material to the plurality of extension members. The height of the fence can be adjusted, for example, when the particulate matter accumulated on the leeward side of the fence accumulates to a level of between approximately ⅓ to ⅔ meters from a top of the attached fencing material.
Advantageously, embodiments of the sand fence include a geogrid mesh of 50% porosity and circular apertures, which can be manufactured in long rolls of 80 to 100 meters long and 2 meters high. This mesh can be mounted on fence posts and tension wires to provide stability. The 50% porosity, in conjunction with circular apertures, was found in a study conducted by the inventors to be the most effective configuration in reducing the wind speed when it approaches the sand fence and in causing the drop of a maximum load of sand on the leeward side. Also from the study, it was determined that substantially higher porosities resulted in substantially less effect on wind speed, thus allowing more sand to pass the fence without stopping; and substantially lower porosities resulted in an excess deceleration or a sudden stop of wind velocity and the dropping the sand load in front of the sand fence, which results in shortening the life of the sand fence (i.e., the sand fence becoming quickly buried).
Also from the study, it was determined that the maximum height of the majority of sand particles carried by wind currents (80-90% of moving sand) was approximately 2 meters. The remainder of the sand (dust) was found in the study to be and remain in suspension regardless of the speed of the wind currents, and thus, was not economically efficient to try to control. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention provide a geogrid sand fence having an effective height of approximately 2 meters. The study also concluded that perpendicular positioning of sand fence results in more sand accumulation and more effective protection from moving sand. Accordingly, embodiments of the sand fence are constructed in one or more long sections perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction, rather than being parallel to the facility being protected.
Such sand fence design, according to embodiments of the present invention, is flexible and can extend in kilometers distance to protect large facilities such as roads, industrial plants, etc. Further, such sand fence design allows flexible selection of support posts and tension wires to provide stabilities to hold the geogrid sand fence, beyond that of conventional fencing. Such sand fence design also allows the height to be easily extended to prolong the usefulness of the sand fence as sand accumulates around the fence. Thus, such sand fence design can advantageously facilitate the intercept of moving sand at a proper distance from a protected facility over an extended period of time, beyond that conventionally possible.
So that the manner in which the features and advantages of the invention, as well as others which will become apparent, may be understood in more detail, a more particular description of the invention briefly summarized above may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings, which form a part of this specification. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only various embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of the invention's scope as it may include other effective embodiments as well.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate embodiments of the invention. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the illustrated embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
As shown in
The sand fence 30 can also include a plurality of galvanized tension wires 43 (e.g., four) extending between each adjacent pair of support members 31, 33, each configured either as a continuous length of wire between end members 31, which are secured to the intermediate support members 33 via, e.g., PVC coated, tightening wires; or as individual wire segments connecting between support members 31, 33, using the tightening wires or other fastening means known to those skilled in the art. According to the exemplary configuration, for support members 31, 33, for example, configured to extend 210 cm above the surface 29, the individual tension wires 43 can be located, for example, at approximately the 10 cm, 77 cm, 143 cm, and 210 cm locations along the support members 31, 33, above the surface 29. In either exemplary configuration, the tensioning wires 43 can be connected to the end members 31, for example, using various fasteners known to those skilled in the art (e.g., 8 mm bolts).
According to embodiment of the installation process, the individual tension wires 43 can alternatingly extend around opposite sides of each of the intermediate members 33 (see, e.g.,
As perhaps best shown in
As perhaps best shown in
In the most preferred embodiment of a sand fence 30, the fencing material 51 is a High Density Polyethylene (“HDPE”) plastic mesh geogrid, for example, having 2% finely divided carbon black for enhanced ultraviolet resistance. HDPE products with proper UV stabilization have been determined by the inventors to be the best polymer products for the expected operational conditions because of its higher density, high impact resistance, and higher life span in such exposed conditions, as compared to other polymers in similar conditions.
As shown in
Still further, it was found that a structural weight of approximately 0.650 Kg/m2±0.025 Kg/m2 provides enhanced benefits. A relatively heavy weight provides a certain degree of stability to the fencing material 51, and thus, the sand fence 30. It also helps the fencing material 51 to resist the impact encountered due to movement/flying sand. It also beneficially helps increase the life of the fencing material 51, and thus, the sand fence 30, against the U.V. attack associated with the exposed conditions. Because U.V. attack is a surface phenomenon causing surface erosion of the polymer, surface erosion will take place, but due to such a heavy weight, according to the preferred configuration, it will take an extensive amount of time for the fencing material 51 to be eroded. The weight, however, should not be too high, otherwise such weight will tend to cause a problem in handling of roles of the fencing material 51. Excessive weight will also result in a need for heavier installation accessories, which will ultimately increase the cost of the sand fence installation, without adding any substantial additional benefit to the sand fence 30. Accordingly, a structural weight of approximately 0.650 Kg/m2±0.025 Kg/m2 was found to maximize such benefits while minimizing such limitations. It is expected that the fencing material 51 made according to such embodiment of the present invention, even in exposed conditions, will last for at least 15-20 years, which is a much higher period than the expected life of the sand fence 30, itself.
As shown in
As perhaps best shown in
Although the sand fence 30 is primarily configured to be positioned in a sand environment, such sand environments sometimes include hard or rock surfaces. As shown in
As perhaps best shown in
Embodiments of the present invention also include methods for depositing matter moved by wind currents. For example, as perhaps best shown in
According to an embodiment of the method, the polymer fencing material 51 has a height in a range of preferably between approximately 1.5 meters to 2.5 meters, and more preferably 2.0 meters, and can have a plurality of apertures 53 that result in a fencing material porosity in a range of between 40% to 60%, and more preferably between approximately 45% to 55%, and even more preferably approximately 50%, to reduce a speed of the wind currents as the wind currents move through the fencing material 51. Further, the apertures 53 are preferably substantially circular apertures with diameters in a range of between, for example, approximately 6 mm to 10 mm. Such combination of features has been found in a study to maximize the control of sand. Particularly, it has been found that such a sand fence 30 can control between approximately 80% and 90% of moving particulate matter moving responsive to the wind currents, maximizing particulate matter precipitation and accumulation 75 on a leeward side of the fence 30 prior to the wind currents reaching the facility to be protected.
Further, according to an embodiment of the method, the polymer fencing material 51 is attached to the support members 31, 33, so that the fencing material 51 is positioned above the surface 29, 81, in a range of between approximately 10 cm and 20 cm to prevent creeping sand or other matter not able to easily pass through the apertures 53 or continue movement therethrough, from collecting on the windward side of the sand fence 30. Further, in order to enhance the strength of the sand fence 30, particularly where wind currents can shift in opposite directions, the fencing material 51 can be horizontally positioned to alternate between opposite contact surfaces of adjacent intermediate post members 33 as illustrated in
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the method can also include adjusting a height of the sand fence 30 so that the height is increased responsive to particulate matter accumulation 75 to thereby maintain maximized particulate matter accumulation (block 107). Such step is generally performed when the particulate matter (e.g., sand particles 91) accumulated on the leeward side of the sand fence 30, accumulates to a level of between approximately ⅓ to ⅔ meters from a top of the attached fencing material 51. The step of adjusting the height of the sand fence 30 can include the steps of connecting a separate one of a plurality of extension members 95, 97, to an extension connector 71 positioned at an upper end portion of each separate one of the plurality of support members 31, 33. As with the initial installation of the sand fence 30, the method can also include the step of connecting a set of at least three, but preferably four, tensioning wires 43 between adjacent pairs of extension members 95, 97, and attaching additional polymer fencing material 51 to the plurality of extension members 95, 97, and/or tension wires 43. The step of installing the additional fencing material 51 can include horizontally positioning the fencing material 51 to alternate between opposite contact surfaces of adjacent intermediate post extension members 97.
As a recap, according to the studies performed in the development of various embodiments of the present invention, including the exemplary configurations, described above, the 50% porosity, from aerodynamic point of view, was found to be the most effective porosity in slowing moving wind gently to drop the load of sand in the leeward side of the sand fence 30, and in minimizing turbulence which could cause lifting of sand particles 91 from a sand particle accumulation 75 formed on the leeward side of the sand fence 30. The circular configuration of the apertures 53 was found to provide the most appropriate geometry in slowing the wind speed gently, as opposed to abruptly, and to minimize turbulence which could cause lifting of sand particles 91 from a sand particle accumulation 75 formed on the leeward side of the sand fence 30. The 2-meter height of the sand fence 30 was found to be the most effective height to intercept 80-90% of the total sand particles 91, which comprises creeping and trajectory sand particles. Positioning of the sand fence 30 perpendicular to the prevailing wind currents was found to be the most effective orientation, in contrast to positioning the sand fence 30 parallel to the facility to be protected. Securing the sand fence 30 with post members 31, 33, and tension wires 43, along with guy wires 35 secured with stake posts 61, was found to not only protect the fence from scavengers or animals, but to provide a wind velocity capability substantially within all possible operational wind velocity conditions provided the fence material 51 is not cut or blocked by flying debris.
Benefits of the above described technology can include the application of standardized sand fence materials, design, and construction; and the minimization of safety hazards associated with moving sand such as, for example, road blockage, the covering of pipeline manifold valves, sand accumulations over pipelines that prevent access in case of an emergency. Benefits also include reduced budgeting for mechanical sand removal (currently the primary existing method in use), which tends to enhance sand movement and a need for continuous contractor maintenance. Benefits further include increased local manufacturer and contractor participation, particularly in arid regions, which may not provide ready access to wood and wood products.
In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed a typical preferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms are employed, the terms are used in a descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation. The invention has been described in considerable detail with specific reference to these illustrated embodiments. It will be apparent, however, that various modifications and changes can be made within the spirit and scope of the invention as described in the foregoing specification.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2753156 | Rieger | Jul 1956 | A |
2872161 | Olson | Feb 1959 | A |
3347527 | Andrews | Oct 1967 | A |
3913889 | Nugent et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4339114 | Deike | Jul 1982 | A |
4339117 | Tison | Jul 1982 | A |
5184800 | Tabler | Feb 1993 | A |
5267816 | Mercer et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5269631 | Mercer et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5402988 | Eisele | Apr 1995 | A |
5419659 | Mercer | May 1995 | A |
5669796 | Harford | Sep 1997 | A |
5758868 | Shea | Jun 1998 | A |
5864427 | Fukano et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6626611 | Winters | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6890367 | Alghamdi | May 2005 | B2 |
6986624 | Tabler | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7001112 | Walsh | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011112 | Chszaniecki | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7780148 | Kirby | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010052595 | Hulett | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20060002772 | Tabler | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060249720 | Kirby | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070170411 | Ribak | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1580418 | Aug 2003 | CN |
8620556 | Nov 1996 | DE |
29821883 | Dec 1997 | DE |
1038654 | Aug 2001 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Alghamdi, Al-Kahtani, Sand Control Measures and Sand Drift Fences, Nov. 2005, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 295-299. |
AgriFlex Product Page, Snow Fence, <http://web.archive.org/20061207180409/http://www.agriflex-fencing.com/sno—fenc . . . > Archive.org dated Dec. 2006. |
Memphisnet.net, Netting, Plastic Fences. Archived from archive.org on Oct. 12, 2008, 2 pages. <http://www.memphisnet.net/category/netting—plastic—fences>. |
AgriFlex, “Snow Fence”, <http://www.agriflex-fencing.com/snow—fence.html> ret Jan. 2014. www.archive.org date: Nov. 18, 2002. |
Memphis, “Plastic and Vinyl Coated Wire Netting”, <http://www.memphisnet.net/10/FishCatalog/PlasticNetting.html? ret Jan. 2014. www.archive.org date Dec. 18, 2002. |
Tabler, “Snow Fence Guide” SHRP-W/FR-91-106, Strategic National Highway Research Program, National Research Counci, Published Oct. 1991. ISBN: 309-05251-3. |
Tabler, 1994 “Design Guidelines for the Control of Blowing and Drifting Snow”, p. 199. |
Bofah, 1986 “Field tests of porous fences in the regime of sand-laden wind”, Abstract. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industiral Aerodynamics. |
Tabler, 1992 “What's New in Fencing for Snow, Wind and Sand”, 8 pages. |
Clements, 1963 “A Study of Windborne Sand and Dust in Desert Areas”, p. 30, US Army Natick Laboratories, “Unclassified”. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 15, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100123112 A1 | May 2010 | US |