The present invention related to the field of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) electromagnetic and electrostatic actuators and more particularly the present invention relates to actuation schemes and architectures for scanning micro-mirror devices placed on a gimbaled element with a symmetric internal electro-static actuator and a symmetric external electro-magnetic actuator.
Many MEMS applications require tilting motion of reflecting surfaces (i.e., micro-mirrors). In particular, there are applications with the need for tilting motions in two directions simultaneously, i.e., a mechanism having two degrees-of-freedom (DOF). One of such application is a scanning micro-mirror device for the use of displaying images.
Micro-mirrors offer numerous advantages in realizing optical scanning systems. Their small size, low cost and low power consumption provide a compelling solution for image creation and display systems. However, current state-of-the-art design still fall short on achieving the required performance (i.e., resolution, scan range, repeatability, scan linearity and power) which is required to making micro-mirrors based displays competitive to other display technologies.
The actuation of micro-mirrors in two DOF is essential for the functionality of the device. One way to implement actuation of an element in two DOF is with two different elements, each of which moves simultaneously in orthogonal directions. One way to implement actuation of an element in two DOF is by actuating a single gimbaled element having two DOF. The preferred architecture for micro-mirror scanners is the gimbaled design, where a single mirror is manipulated across two DOF. This architecture utilizes only one mirror for the two dimensional scan, thus reducing the chip size and simplifying the optical system design. The mirror is manipulated across both axes by using an actuation mechanism. The scan across one axis (horizontal axis) is done at a relative high frequency, typically a few KHz, while the scan across the second axis (vertical axis) is done at a relative lower frequency, typically a few tens of Hz.
Actuation Mechanisms
The prevalent actuation mechanisms are:
Reference is made to
Electromagnetic Mechanisms
Reference is made to
The main advantage of the electromagnetic actuation is the high force density, resulting in a device that can operate in protective environment without the need for vacuum. However, it is not trivial to use electromagnetic actuation for inner gimbaled moving elements. Therefore, it is prevalent to use electrostatic actuation for the above. Although a method that can simultaneously actuate a gimbaled element in two DOF, while using two different actuators, is more robust and less sensitive to mechanical coupling, but is not trivial for implementation.
Symmetric Electrostatic Mechanisms
To overcome the asymmetry of electrostatic actuation mechanism 100, a different electrostatic actuation mechanism was introduced in U.S. Pat. No. 6,595,055 (U.S. '055), given to Schenk et al. U.S. '055 provided a scissors-like mechanism that introduced an electrostatic actuation mechanism with a pure torque applied to the axis of movement of the rotor, not giving raise to unwarranted force on the axis of rotation.
Reference is made to
Feedback Control
A critical parameter in micro-mirror design is the attainable scan angle, which determines the optical system design and resulting size of the display. One of the main limitations in all actuation mechanisms is the maximum attainable scan angle since current or voltage, at the micro-mirror are limited.
To provide repeatability and linearity, a feedback mechanism is incorporated in the mirror design. The feedback mechanism however is susceptible to interference from the drive signals which are typically orders of magnitude stronger. Furthermore, the feedback control of existing scanners falls short of the required linearity and repeatability and typically sense one DOF.
Conclusion
Thus, there is a need for and it would be advantageous for applications using micro-mirrors architecture to have a system that can meet one or more of the following challenges:
a) Eliminating the coupling/interference/crosstalk between the two axes of motion;
b) Achieving low drive power while maintaining a linear and repeatable scan;
c) Increasing available drive force to increase scan angle:
d) Improving the feedback sensors to increase the resolution; and/or
e) Optimizing feedback algorithms to provide the required repeatability and linearity.
The invention described henceforth, presents a new paradigm in actuation schemes and architecture of gimbaled elements, which eliminates the mechanical coupling of the two DOFs. This invention enables a simple implementation and sufficient power for high quality performances typically required in such devices.
The term “gimbaled element” as used herein refers to an element with two angular degrees of freedom, capable of moving about two axes simultaneously, the angles rotating about axes which are substantially mutually orthogonal and coplanar. Reference is made to
According to the present invention there is provided a micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) device for actuating a gimbaled element. The MEMS device includes an electromagnetic actuator for actuating a first angular degree of freedom (DOF) of rotation about the vertical axis; and an electrostatic actuator for actuating the second angular DOF of rotation about the horizontal axis, wherein the horizontal axis and the vertical axis are orthogonal and coplanar. The electromagnetic actuator has a symmetric structure, thereby actuating forces produced by the electromagnetic actuator, create only a rotational movement of the first DOF, about the horizontal axis. The electromagnetic actuator excites only negligible residual actuation force on the second DOF. The electrostatic actuator uses electrostatic fringing fields, thereby creating an actuation force, and since the electrostatic actuator has a symmetric structure, the actuating forces create only a rotational movement of the second DOF about the vertical axis. The electrostatic actuator excites only negligible residual actuation force on the first DOF. Both the rotor and the stator of the electrostatic actuator are created from the same layer and there is no electrical potential difference between both sides of the layer of the electrostatic actuator.
The electrostatic actuator actuates the second degree of freedom in the horizontal scan direction and the electromagnetic actuator, actuates the first degree of freedom in the vertical scan direction. The electromagnetic actuator includes external fixed electromagnet coils and internal rotating magnets, wherein the rotating magnets are affixed to said horizontal axis and actuated by the electromagnet coils. One or more electromagnetic actuators can be used on each side of the horizontal axis.
In embodiments of the present invention the electrostatic actuator include a frequency sensor with high signal to noise ratio.
The MEMS device of the present invention is preferably manufactured using a 4-masks Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) fabrication process.
The present invention will become fully understood from the detailed description given herein below and the accompanying drawings, which are given by way of illustration and example only and thus not limitative of the present invention.
a is a schematic front view of an electrostatic actuator of a gimbaled subsystem, according to embodiments of the present invention;
b is a schematic top view of the electrostatic actuator shown in
a is an enlargement of a portion of the electrostatic actuator shown in
The present invention is of a MEMS actuation scheme and architectures for scanning micro-mirror devices placed on a gimbaled element with a symmetric internal electro-static actuator and a symmetric external electromagnetic actuator. The external electromagnets for inducing magnetic flux are static, having the fixed magnets deposited on the mirror itself. The present invention actuator design enables a planar assembly of the micro-mirror and electromagnet and there are no mechanical limitations on the travel of the mirror. Furthermore, the gimbaled element of the present invention provides better electromagnetic conversion efficiency with no power limits. This innovative architecture of external electromagnets enables to implement a very powerful actuator which is symmetric to the scanner vertical rotation axis. Excitation of secondary DOF and image blurring are eliminated. The innovative architecture and design of the gimbaled element enables a standard 4-masks Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) fabrication process.
Before explaining embodiments of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of design and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
Referring now to the drawings,
The Electromagnetic Mechanisms
Referring now made to
When DC electric current is introduced into the coils of electromagnets 536, magnetic flux is formed, thereby creating a repelling/attracting force rotating magnets 534 which is attached to axis 532, and thereby creating a rotational movement of annular element 525 about axis 532, in the direction of the repelling/attracting force. When movement is required in the opposite direction, the polarity of the DC electric current is introduced into the coils of electromagnets 536 is changed, thereby creating magnetic flux in the opposite direction. Electromagnet actuator 530 actuates outer, annular element 525 of gimbaled subsystem 500, providing the scan across the vertical axis, which is done at a relative low frequency, typically a few tens of Hz.
The design of electromagnetic actuator 530 enables a planar assembly of micro-mirror 510 and electromagnet 530. The design does not suffer from mechanical limitations on the travel of the mirror and provides good electromagnetic conversion efficiency with no power limits.
The Electrostatic Mechanisms
The present invention overcomes the complexity of the implementation of electrostatic actuation of dual-gimbaled scanners, with a unique design based on a standard 4-masks SOI fabrication process. The architecture uses a symmetric structure and a novel grounding scheme. The grounding scheme (as described in
Referring now made to
Reference is also made to
Electrostatic actuator 520 has a symmetrical structure and hence the actuating force produced, creates only a rotational movement of inner element with mirror 510 about axis 522, with no excitation of annular element 525 about axis 532. Electrostatic actuator 520 applies no unwarranted forces on axis 522, which typically, in MEMS technology, is flexible. Due to the symmetrical structure and lack of unwarranted forces on axis 522, electrostatic actuator 520 provides electromechanical response around its rotation axis only.
Feedback Control Architecture
In order to operate the actuators in a closed loop format, feedback sensors are required. These sensors can be utilized either in the structure itself, or by external sensors (e.g., position sensing detector).
The present invention uses a combination of frequency and position sensing control schemes, to achieve a more precise and optimized operation of the mirror. The electrostatic drive actuation includes an integrated frequency sensor to obtain high signal-to-noise ratio and the electromagnetic drive actuation includes a position feedback design. The integration of the frequency sensor and the position feedback design provides true raster scanning. The frequency sensing of electrostatic actuator 520, can utilize the comb like fingers of stator 523 and rotor 521. The electromagnetic drive actuation includes position sensing detectors, which can be implemented as internal sensing in the design of the drive or external sensing element.
The Gimbaled Subsystem
Electrostatic actuator 520 actuates inner element of gimbaled subsystem 500, providing the scan across the horizontal axis, which is done at a relative high frequency, typically a few KHz. Electromagnet actuator 530 actuates outer annular element 525 of gimbaled subsystem 500, providing the scan across the vertical axis, which is done at a relative lower frequency, typically a few tens of Hz.
There is no or negligible mechanical coupling of the two degrees of freedom, i.e. electrostatic actuator 520 actuates only the inner element of gimbaled subsystem 500, and electromagnet actuator 530 actuates only the outer, annular element 525 of gimbaled subsystem 500.
Therefore, the foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact design and operation shown and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, it will be appreciated that many variations, modifications and other applications of the invention may be made.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IL2007/000436 | 4/10/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/3/2009 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2008/068735 | 6/12/2008 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4003626 | Reinke et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
| 6044705 | Neukermans et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6140979 | Gerhard et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6181460 | Tran et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6295154 | Laor et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6480320 | Nasiri | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6595055 | Schenk et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6744173 | Behin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6760144 | Hill et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 7071594 | Yan et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 20030019832 | Conant et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20040004749 | Orcutt et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136041 | Togino | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207744 | Bock | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223195 | Nomura | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050078345 | Turner et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050082252 | Nasiri et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128609 | Shimada et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050243446 | Wood | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20080055815 | Rottenberg | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080094682 | Greywall et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080197748 | Naftali et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090058562 | Joodaki | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20100020379 | Lubianiker | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20110228367 | Lubianiker et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO2006051544 | May 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Wolter A. et al., “Improved layout for a resonant 2D micro-scanning mirror with low operation voltages”; Proc. SPIE vol. 4985, pp. 72-82, (2003). |
| Sprague et al., “Bi-axial magnetic drive for scanned beam display mirrors”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 5721; pp. 1-13, (2005). |
| Ji et al., “Dual-axis electro-magnetic scanning micromirror using radial magnetic field”, presented at MEMS '06, Istanbul, Turkey (2006). |
| Kwon et al., “Vertical comb-drive based 2-D gimbaled micromirrors with large static rotation by backside island isolation”; J. Selected topics in quantum elec., vol. 10(3), pp. 498-504 (2004). |
| Leus et al., “Fringing field effect in electrostatic actuators”, ETR-2004-2, 2004 (a technical document associates with the technion, Haifa, Israel). |
| Hakan et al., “Optical performance requirements for MEMS-scanner based micro displays”, SPIE vol. 4178, p. 176-185 (2000). |
| Muhlshtein et al., “High cycle fatigue of single crystal si thin films”; JMEMS vol. 10, Dec. 2001. |
| http::/www.Hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.ed. |
| Hecht, Eugene “Optics,” 3rd ed., Addison Wesley (1998). |
| Jenkins et al., “Fundamentals of Optics,” 4th ed., McGraw-Hill (1976). |
| Kingslake et al., “Applied Optics and Optical Engineering,” Academic Press (1965). |
| Ray, Sidney F., “Applied Photographic Optics,” 2nd ed., Focal Press (1997). |
| Timoshenko et al., “Theory of Elasticity,” 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill International (1970). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100020379 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60868340 | Dec 2006 | US |