The present invention relates to a gimbaled reflector mounting platform, and in particular to a mechanical steering device for a parabolic dish or flat plate antenna for use in such applications as satellite communications or radar systems.
Conventional antenna steering devices, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,691,207 issued Sep. 1, 1987 to Timineri; U.S. Pat. No. 6,285,338 issued Sep. 4, 2001 to Bai et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,559,806 issued May 6, 2003 to Watson, include a first motor providing full azimuth rotation (360°) about a vertical axis, and a second motor providing full elevation rotation (90°) about a horizontal axis. In certain applications, e.g. shipboard, maximum range of adjustability is a requirement; however, in instances when the total scan angle requirements are more limited, there are advantages to using less bulky systems. Specifically, the aforementioned fully adjustable systems have a large height profile requiring extra supporting structure, which adds to the complexity and cost of the device. Moreover, the first motor must support the mass of the antenna, as well as the mass of the second motor, which greatly increases the size of the first motor required. Furthermore, the center of gravity of a conventional antenna is usually offset from the pivot points, thereby requiring motors with considerably more torque.
In an effort to solve the aforementioned problems yoke supporting structures have been developed, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,439,550 issued Apr. 22, 1969 to Goulding; U.S. Pat. No. 4,238,802 issued Dec. 9, 1980 to Speicher; U.S. Pat. No. 4,392,140 issued Jul. 5, 1983 to Bastian et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,531,990 issued Mar. 11, 2003 to Verkerk. Unfortunately, when these devices are mounted in any position other than the vertical position illustrated in the patents, the antenna's center of mass would be far from the main support, which results in the base motor having to support the entire mass of the antenna, and, in some cases, the mass of the upper motor, as well. Furthermore, in pulley and wire systems the pull strings are the weakest link, which, when broken, disable the system and potentially cause uncontrolled movement. Relatively complex alternatives have also been developed, but these involve complicated mechanical structures, requiring high manufacturing costs.
An object of the present invention is to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art by providing a relatively simple gimbaled mounting platform with a centrally disposed ball joint for supporting a reflector.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a gimbaled reflector mounting device comprising:
a base for supporting the device;
a yoke, rotatable about a first axis, having a first and a second end;
a first motor mounted on the base for rotating the yoke about the first axis;
a reflector pivotally mounted to the first and second ends of the yoke about a second axis;
a second motor mounted on the yoke for rotating the reflector about the second axis;
a universal coupling, supported by the base, disposed at an intersection of the first and second axes for pivotally supporting the reflector.
The invention will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings which represent preferred embodiments thereof, wherein:
The reflector mounting platform according to the present invention includes a semicircular yoke 1 rotatable about a fixed elevation axis EA. Bearings 2 and 3 are mounted on either end of the yoke 1 for pivotally supporting a flat plate (or parabolic dish) reflector 4 about a pivotable cross-elevation axis XEA. With reference to
Any of the standard feed methods could be used for receiving a signal, e.g. radio frequency signal, collected by the reflector 4 including direct feed and the use of a secondary reflector. If a direct feed (not shown) were used with the reflector 4, it could be attached to a center post assembly or mounted on struts attached to the edge of the reflector 4. Alternatively, a secondary reflector could be used, either centered or offset. With a centered secondary reflector, the feed is mounted on top of the ball joint 11 with a waveguide or coaxial cable leading the radio frequency signal through the reflector 4 to the backside thereof.
An elevation motor 5, positioned on a base 6 directly below the center of the reflector 4, drives gears, which engage teeth 7 on the yoke 1, for rotating the reflector 4 about the elevation axis EA. A cross-elevation motor 8 is disposed on one arm of the yoke 1, proximate the outer free end thereof and adjacent to bearing 2, for rotating the reflector 4 about the cross-elevation axis XEA. A semicircular gear 9, connected to the reflector 4, engages the cross-elevation motor 8, see
A pedestal 10 with a universal coupling, such a ball joint 11, on the outer free end thereof, extends upwardly from the cross-elevation motor 8, along an azimuth axis AA perpendicular to the elevation axis EA, for supporting the center of the reflector 4. A semi-spherical indentation 12 is formed in the center of the reflector 4 for receiving the ball joint 11. A mounting collar 13, with an opening only slightly smaller than the diameter of the ball joint 11, is secured to the backside of the reflector 4, sandwiching the ball joint 11 therebetween. To maximize the range of adjustability, the interface between the mounting collar 13 and the reflector 4 lies in a plane that intersects the center of the ball joint 11. The use of other universal couplings such as universal joints is also possible depending upon the amount of swing required.
Preferably, the elevation axis EA extends through the center of semicircular yoke 1, or an arc defined thereby, and through the center of the ball joint 11. In the illustrated embodiment the elevation axis EA is spaced from and substantially parallel to the base 6, and perpendicular to the pedestal 10; however, it is also within the boundaries of this invention to substitute the elevation axis EA with the azimuth axis AA extending from the base 6 up through the pedestal 9, whereby the motor 5 rotates the semicircular yoke 1 around the azimuth axis AA.
Since the bulk of the antenna is supported by the ball joint 11 instead of the yokes or swivels, as in the prior art, the bearings 2 and 3 need not include as large a bearing surface, resulting in a reduction in size and cost.
Furthermore the size of the motors 5 and 8 required to rotate the reflector 4 are relatively small compared to those needed to drive standard mounting systems, which reduces the cost thereof, and reduces the gear and torque related noise generated by the mounting platform. Moreover, electrical power consumption, wire size and cabling can all be reduced, thereby further reducing the cost and complexity of the mounting platform.
The reflector mounting platform according to the present invention is adaptable for use with antenna structures ranging from small to very large. For any size of reflector 4, the mounting platform can be counterbalanced about a central pivot point, defined by the ball joint 11. The ball joint 11 relieves the motors 5 and 8 from moving a mass, which is displaced from its rotation axis. Moreover, the torque requirements on the motors 5 and 8 are reduced, because the center of the mass is close to the center of the ball joint 11.
In a resting or horizontal position, see
An alternative feed mounting arrangement is illustrated in
The present invention claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/443,550 filed Jan. 30, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3439550 | Goulding | Apr 1969 | A |
4238802 | Speicher | Dec 1980 | A |
4282529 | Speicher | Aug 1981 | A |
4332426 | Speicher | Jun 1982 | A |
4392140 | Bastian et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4691207 | Timineri | Sep 1987 | A |
5227806 | Eguchi | Jul 1993 | A |
6262687 | Bai et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262688 | Kasahara | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266029 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285338 | Bai et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6333718 | Poncel et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6486845 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6531990 | Verkerk | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6559806 | Watson | May 2003 | B1 |
6577281 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040150574 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60443550 | Jan 2003 | US |