The present invention relates to lighting. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention relate to a compact optic lens for a high intensity light source having improved output beam characteristics. Some general goals include, increasing light output without increasing device cost or device size to enable coverage of many beam angles.
The present invention relates to lighting. More specifically, the present invention relates to a compact optic lens for a high intensity light source.
The era of the Edison vacuum light bulb will be coming to an end soon. In many countries and in many states, common incandescent bulbs are becoming illegal, and more efficient lighting sources are being mandated. Some of the alternative light sources currently include fluorescent tubes, halogen, and light emitting diodes (LEDs). Despite the availability and improved efficiencies of these other options, many people have still been reluctant to switch to these alternative light sources.
There are several key reasons why consumers have been slow to adopt the newer technologies. One such reason is the use of toxic substances in the lighting sources. As an example, fluorescent lighting sources typically rely upon mercury in a vapor form to produce light. Because the mercury vapor is considered a hazardous material, spent lamps cannot simply be disposed of at the curbside but must be transported to designated hazardous waste disposal sites. Additionally, some fluorescent tube manufacturers go so far as to instruct the consumer to avoid using the bulb in more sensitive areas of the house such as in bedrooms, kitchens, and the like.
The inventors of the present invention also believe that another reason for the slow adoption of alternative lighting sources is the low performance compared to the incandescent light bulb. As an example, fluorescent lighting sources often rely on a separate starter or ballast mechanism to initiate the illumination. Because of this, fluorescent lights sometimes do not turn on “instantaneously” as consumers expect and demand. Further, fluorescent lights typically do not immediately provide light at full brightness, but typically ramp up to full brightness within an amount of time (e.g., 30 seconds). Further, most fluorescent lights are fragile, are not capable of dimming, have ballast transformers that can emit annoying audible noise, and can fail in a shortened period of time if cycled on and off frequently. Because of this, fluorescent lights do not have the performance consumers require.
Another type of alternative lighting source more recently introduced relies on the use of light emitting diodes (LEDs). LEDs have advantages over fluorescent lights including the robustness and reliability inherent in solid state devices, the lack of toxic chemicals that can be released during accidental breakage or disposal, instant-on capabilities, dimmability, and the lack of audible noise. The inventors of the present invention believe, however, that current LED lighting sources themselves have significant drawbacks that cause consumers to be reluctant to using them.
A key drawback with current LED lighting sources is that the light output (e.g., lumens) is relatively low. Although current LED lighting sources draw a significantly lower amount of power than their incandescent equivalents (e.g., 5-10 watts v. 50 watts), they are believed to be far too dim to be used as primary lighting sources. As an example, a typical 5 watt LED lamp in the MR16 form factor may provide 200-300 lumens, whereas a typical 50 watt incandescent bulb in the same form factor may provide 700-1000 lumens. As a result, current LEDs are often used only for exterior accent lighting, closets, basements, sheds or other small spaces.
Another drawback with current LED lighting sources includes an upfront cost that is often shockingly high to consumers. For example, for floodlights, a current 30 watt equivalent LED bulb may retail for over $60, whereas a typical incandescent floodlight may retail for $12. Although the consumer may rationally “make up the difference” over the lifetime of the LED by the LED consuming less power, the inventors believe the significantly higher prices greatly suppress consumer demand. Because of this, current LED lighting sources do not have the price or performance that consumers expect and demand.
Additional drawbacks with current LED lighting sources include that they have many parts and are labor intensive to produce. As an example, one manufacturer of an MR16 LED lighting source utilizes over 14 components (excluding electronic chips), and another manufacturer of an MR 16 LED lighting source utilizes over 60 components. The inventors of the present invention believe that these manufacturing and testing processes are more complicated and more time consuming, compared to manufacturing and testing of a LED device with fewer parts and using a more modular manufacturing process.
Additional drawbacks with current LED lighting sources are that the output performance is limited by the heat sink volume. More specifically, the inventors believe that for replacement LED light sources, such as MR16 light sources, current heat sinks are incapable of dissipating much of the heat generated by the LEDs under natural convection. In many applications, the LED lamps are placed into an enclosure such as a recessed ceiling that already experiences ambient air temperatures over 50 degrees C. At such temperatures the emissivity of surfaces plays only a small role in dissipating the heat. Furthermore, because conventional electronic assembly techniques and LED reliability factors limit PCB board temperatures to about 85 degrees C., the power output of the LEDs is also greatly constrained. At higher temperatures, radiation can play a much more important role, and as a result high emissivity heat sink surfaces are desirable.
Traditionally, light output from LED lighting sources has been enhanced simply by increasing the number of LEDs, which has led to increased device costs, and increased device size. Additionally, such lights have had limited beam angles and limited outputs due to limitations on the dimensions of reflectors and other optics.
Embodiments of the present disclosure use certain lighting-related terms, which are now defined.
Beam light angle refers to the angle where light intensity of a light source drops to about 50% of the maximum intensity. For example, a light source with a maximum or central beam intensity of 2000 candle power will have a beam angle defined by where the light intensity drops to about 1000 candle power.
Field angle refers to the angle where the light intensity of the light source drops to about 10% of the maximum or central beam intensity. For example, a light source with a maximum or central beam intensity of 2000 candle power will have an associated field angle within which the light intensity drops to about 200 candle power.
Direct glare associated with a light source refers to light provided by a light source within a region outside the field angle or outside 30 degrees off-axis, that is brighter than a specified percentage of the maximum output of the light source (e.g., about 0.1%). In the prior art, light output from the central portion of reflective lenses has been proposed in a variety of ways that did not provide acceptable results. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,557 and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,896,381, the reflective lens includes a centrally located transmissive lens that disperses light directly from the high intensity center region of a light source. Drawbacks with such approaches include that the reflected light from the reflective portion of the lens and the directly transmitted light from the central portion of the lens produce two distinct light beams. When the two different light beams do not overlap, a dark gap is apparent and the output light is also undesirably non-uniform. When the two different light beams overlap, a hot spot is apparent and the output light is also undesirably non-uniform. These solutions also do not contemplate glare and do not even ways to reduce glare.
In another prior art example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,238,050, the reflective lens includes a central reflector that reflects high intensity light back to a main reflector. The main reflector then reflects the light outward from the cap. Drawbacks with such approaches include that the deliberately reflected light may not be constrained such that the light output is undesirably non-uniform. In other examples, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,896,381, and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,473,554, the front lens is configured to not require a central reflector. The same drawback exists with this approach because reflected light from a central region is of high intensity and contrasts with the absence of directly transmitted light from the central region. As a result, the light output is undesirably non-uniform. Additionally, these solutions do not contemplate glare and do not address ways to reduce glare.
In other prior art examples, methods for reducing glare have included recessing a light source deep within a cylindrical or conical collar. Such solutions physically reduce glare by reducing the beam angle and/or field angle, similar to “barn doors” used in stage lighting. Drawbacks to such approaches include that the lighting assembly requires a deep recess housing. Such solutions cannot fit within standardized lighting physical formats and thus are not suitable for the intended purposes of a compact light source.
Accordingly, what is desired is a highly efficient lighting source without the drawbacks described above.
Embodiments of the present invention utilize a monolithically formed optical lens having multiple regions that modify and direct light from the high intensity light source toward an output. In some embodiments, the output beam angle, beam shape, beam transitions (e.g., falloff), and other attributes of the light are at least in part determined by physical characteristics of the monolithically formed optical lens.
According to one aspect of the invention, a compact optic lens for a high intensity light source is described. One device includes a molded transparent body having a light receiving region, a light reflecting region, a light blending region, and a light output region. In various embodiments, the light receiving region comprises a first geometric structure within the transparent body that is configured to receive input light from the high intensity light source within a plurality of first two-dimensional planes, and is configured to provide a first output light within the first two-dimensional planes within the transparent body to a light reflecting region.
In some embodiments, the light reflecting region comprises a surface on the transparent body that is configured to receive the first output light from the light receiving region, and is configured to provide a second output light within the plurality of first two-dimensional planes within the transparent body to the light blending region. In some embodiments, the light blending region comprises a plurality of prism structures formed on the transparent body that is configured to receive the second output light from the light reflecting region, wherein the plurality of prism structures is configured to optically deflect the second output light to form a deflected output light within a plurality of second two-dimensional planes, and wherein the plurality of prism structures is configured to provide the deflected output light as blended light within the transparent body to the light output region. In some embodiments, the plurality of first two-dimensional planes and the plurality of second two-dimensional planes intersect, and the light output region comprises the surface on the transparent body that is configured to receive the blended light and to output the blended light.
According to certain aspects, a method for blending light rays from a light source within a optic lens including a light receiving region, a light reflecting region, a light blending region, and a light output region is described. One technique includes receiving in the light receiving region, a first light ray associated with a first two-dimensional plane from the high intensity light source and providing a first output light ray to the light reflecting region, and a second light ray associated with a second two-dimensional plane from the high intensity light source and providing a second output light ray to the light reflecting region, wherein the first two-dimensional plane and the second two-dimensional plane are not parallel. One process includes receiving in the light reflecting region the first output light ray from the light receiving region and providing a third light ray associated with the first two-dimensional plane to the light blending region, and the second output light ray from the light receiving region and providing a fourth light ray associated with the second two-dimensional plane to the light blending region. A method includes receiving in a plurality of prismatic structures, the third light ray from the light reflecting region and providing a fifth light ray associated with a third two-dimensional plane to the light output region, and the fourth light ray from the light reflecting region and providing a sixth light ray associated with a fourth two-dimensional plane to the light output region, wherein the first two-dimensional plane and the third two-dimensional plane are not parallel, and wherein the second two-dimensional plane and the fourth two-dimensional plane are not parallel. A method includes receiving at a specific location on the light output region, the fifth light ray and the sixth light ray, and outputting blended light in response to the fifth light ray and the sixth light ray.
According to certain aspects, an illumination source configured to output blended light is described. One illumination source includes an LED light unit configured to provide non-uniform light output in response to an output driving voltage, and a driving module coupled to the LED light unit, wherein the driving module is configured to receive an input driving voltage and is configured to provide the output driving voltage. A lamp includes a heat sink coupled to the LED light unit, wherein the heat sink is configured to dissipate heat produced by the LED light unit and by the driving module, and a reflector coupled to the heat sink, wherein the reflector is configured to receive the non-uniform light output, and wherein the reflector is configured to output a light beam having reduced non-uniform light output.
In various embodiments of the present invention, a central portion of the lens is covered with one or more opaque, light attenuating, diffusing or translucent materials that serve as a glare blocker or glare cap. In certain embodiments, a glare cap is embodied as a round metal disc and cap, which can be inset or attached to the center region of the lens. In various embodiments, the glare cap is magnetizible (e.g., includes iron, nickel, or the like), or comprises a magnet. In various embodiments, a round lens filter, or the like, also includes a magnet or a metal central region that attaches to the glare cap.
Glare caps provided by the present disclosure for the lighting assembly can effectively reduce undesirable glare while increasing the maximum center beam intensity, or center beam candle power (CBCP) of a lighting assembly. In various embodiments, a ratio of the intensity of light within a glare range (e.g., from about 30 degrees to about 60 degrees) compared to the maximum center beam intensity is constrained to be within a range of about 1:1000 to about 1:3000. A glare cap placed within a central region of a lens provides this capability. In some embodiments, a ratio of a diameter of the glare cap to the diameter of the lens is on the order of about 1:2.5 to about 1:4.5.
According to certain aspects, a light source is disclosed. One device includes a light assembly comprising a plurality of LED light sources configured to output light, and a heat sink coupled to the light assembly configured to dissipate heat generated by the light assembly. An apparatus may include a lens assembly coupled to the heat sink and the light assembly, wherein the lens assembly is configured to receive light from the plurality of LED light sources, wherein the lens assembly is configured to output light within a beam angle characterized by a maximum beam intensity, wherein the lens assembly is configured to output light within a glare angle characterized by a maximum glare intensity, wherein the glare angle is within a range of about 30 degrees to about 60 degrees, and wherein a ratio of the maximum glare intensity compared to the maximum beam intensity is within a range of about 1:1000 to about 1:5,000.
Reference is now made to certain embodiments of optics for LED-based lamps and methods of using such optics. The disclosed embodiments are not intended to be limiting of the claims. To the contrary, the claims are intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents.
A person skilled in the art will understand that the drawings, described herein, are for illustration purposes only. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope provided by the present disclosure.
For typical single LED lighting assemblies and multiple LED lighting assemblies, the output light beam is non-spatially uniform. For instance, the output light beams of many current LED light sources have hot-spots, dark-spots, roll-offs, rings, and the like. Such non-uniformities can be unattractive and unacceptable for use in many if not most lighting applications. To address these issues, lighting sources that have reduced non-uniform output light beams are provided. Additionally, reflective lenses capable of receiving non-uniform input light beams, and transmitting output light beams with reduced non-uniformity are provided. In some embodiments, an output light beam of a reflective lens may have increased non-uniformity in output light beams, by specific design, e.g., a light ring pattern.
In various embodiments, any suitable LED assembly may be used within LED lighting source 100. Examples of suitable LED assemblies are disclosed in U.S. Application Publication No. 2012/0255872, U.S. Application Publication No. 2013/0322089, U.S. Application Publication No. 2013/0343062, U.S. application Ser. No. 13/915,432 filed on Jun. 11, 2013, U.S. application Ser. No. 13/894,203 filed on May 14, 2013, and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/865,760 filed on Apr. 18, 2013, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. These LED assemblies are currently under development by the assignee of the present patent application. In various embodiments, LED lighting source 100 may provide a peak output brightness of approximately 7600 candelas to 8600 candelas (with approximately 360 lumens to 400 lumens), a peak output brightness of approximately 1050 candelas to 1400 candelas for a 40 degree flood light (with approximately 510 lumens to 650 lumens), and a peak output of approximately 2300 candelas to 2500 candelas for a 25 degree flood light (with approximately 620 lumens to 670 lumens), and the like. Various embodiments of the present invention therefore are believed to have achieved the same brightness as conventional halogen bulb MR-16 lights.
In various embodiments, reflective lens 210 and transmissive lens 260 may be formed from a UV and thermally resistant transparent material, such as glass, polycarbonate material, or the like. In various embodiments, reflecting lens 210 and/or transmissive lens 260 may be clear and transmissive or solid or coated and reflective. In the case of reflecting lens 210, a solid material can create a folded light path such that light that is generated by the integrated LED assembly 220 internally reflects within reflecting lens 210 more than one time prior to being output. Such a folded optic lens enables light from the lamp to have a tighter columniation than is normally available from a conventional reflector of equivalent depth. For transmissive lens 260, the solid material may be clear or tinted, may be machined or molded, or the like to control the output characteristics of the light from lens 210.
In various embodiments, to increase durability of the lamps, the optical materials should be continuously operable at an elevated temperature (e.g., 120 degrees C.) for a prolonged period of time (e.g., hours). One material that may be used for lens 210 is known as Makrolon™ LED 2045 or LED 2245 polycarbonate available from Bayer Material Science AG. In other embodiments, other similar materials may also be used.
In
In some embodiments, transmissive lens 260 may be secured to heat sink 230 via the clips described above. Alternatively, transmissive lens 260 may first be secured to a retaining ring 270, and retaining ring 270 may be secured to one or more indents of heat sink 230. In some embodiments, once transmissive lens 260 and a retaining mechanism (e.g., retaining ring 270) is secured to lens 210 or to heat sink 230, they cannot be removed by hand. In such cases, one or more tools can be used to separate these components. In other embodiments, these components may be removed from lens 210 or from heat sink 230 simply by hand.
In various embodiments of the present invention, LED assemblies may be binned based upon lumen per watt efficacy. For example, in some examples, an integrated LED module/assembly having a lumen per watt (L/W) efficacy from 53 L/W to 66 L/W may be binned for use for 40 degree flood lights, a LED assembly having an efficacy of approximately 60 L/W may be binned for use for spot lights, a LED assembly having an efficacy of approximately 63 L/W to 67 L/W may be used for 25 degree flood lights, and the like. In various embodiments, other classification or categorization of LED assemblies on the basis of L/W efficacy may be used for other target applications.
In some embodiments, as will be illustrated below, integrated LED assembly/module 220 includes 36 LEDs arranged in series, in parallel series (e.g., three parallel strings of 12 LEDs in series), or the like. In other embodiments, any number of LEDs may be used, e.g., 1, 10, 16, or the like. In other embodiments, the LEDs may be electrically coupled in other manner, e.g., all series, or the like. Further details concerning such LED assemblies are provided in the documents incorporated by reference.
In various embodiments, the targeted power consumption for LED assemblies is less than 13 watts. This is much less than the typical power consumption of halogen-based MR16 lights (50 watts). Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention are able to match the brightness or intensity of halogen based MR16 lights, but using less than 20% of the energy.
In various embodiments of the present invention, LED assembly 220 can be directly secured to heat sink 230 to dissipate heat from the light output portion and/or from the electrical driving circuits. In some embodiments, heat sink 230 may include a protrusion portion 250 to be coupled to electrical driving circuits. LED assembly 220 can include a flat substrate such as silicon or the like. In various embodiments, an operating temperature of LED assembly 220 may be from 125 degrees C. to 140 degrees C. In such embodiments, the silicon substrate can be secured to the heat sink using a thermally conductive epoxy (e.g., thermal conductivity ˜96 W/m·k.). In some embodiments, a thermoplastic/thermoset epoxy may be used such as TS-369, TS-3332-LD, or the like, available from Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K. Other epoxies may also be used. In some embodiments, no screws are otherwise used to secure the LED assembly to the heat sink; however, screws or other fasteners may also be used in other embodiments.
In various embodiments, heat sink 230 may be formed from a material having a low thermal resistance and high thermal conductivity. In some embodiments, heat sink 230 may be formed from an anodized 6061-T6 aluminum alloy having a thermal conductivity k=167 W/m·k., and a thermal emissivity e=0.7. In some embodiments, other materials may be used such as 6063-T6 or 1050 aluminum alloy having a thermal conductivity, k=225 W/m·k. and a thermal emissivity, e=0.9. In some embodiments, still other alloys such AL 1100, or the like may be used. Additional coatings may also be added to increase thermal emissivity, for example, paint provided by ZYP Coatings, Inc. utilizing Cr2O3 or CeO2 may provide a thermal emissivity, e=0.9; coatings provided by Materials Technologies Corporation under the brand name Duracon™ may provide a thermal emissivitye>0.98; and the like. In other embodiments, heat sink 230 may include other metals such as copper, or the like.
In some embodiments, at an ambient temperature of 50 degrees C., and in free natural convection heat sink 230 has been measured to have a thermal resistance of approximately 8.5 degrees C./Watt, and in certain embodiments, heat sink 230 has been measured to have a thermal resistance of approximately 7.5 degrees C./Watt. In certain embodiments, heat sink 230 can have a thermal resistance as low as 6.6 degrees/Watt
In various embodiments, base assembly/module 240 in
The shell of base assembly 240 may be formed from an aluminum alloy, and may be formed from an alloy similar to that used for heat sink 230 and/or heat sink 290. In one example, an alloy such as AL 1100 may be used. In other embodiments, high temperature plastic material may be used. In some embodiments, instead of being separate units, base assembly 240 may be monolithically formed with heat sink 230.
As illustrated in
In various embodiments, to facilitate a transfer of heat from the LED driving circuitry to the shell of the base assemblies, and of heat from the silicon substrate of the LED device, a potting compound is provided. The potting compound may be applied in a single step to the internal cavity of base assembly 240 and to the recess within heat sink 230. In various embodiments, a compliant potting compound such as Omegabond® 200 available from Omega Engineering, Inc. or 50-1225 from Epoxies, Etc. may be used. In other embodiments, other types of heat transfer materials may be used.
In various embodiments, the LEDs 300 are mounted upon a silicon substrate 310, or other thermally conductive substrate. In various embodiments, a thin electrically insulating layer and/or a reflective layer may separate LEDs 300 and the silicon substrate 310. Heat produced from LEDs 300 can be transferred to silicon substrate 310 and to a heat sink via a thermally conductive epoxy, as disclosed herein.
In various embodiments, a silicon substrate can be approximately 5.7 mm×5.7 mm in size, and approximately 0.6 microns in depth. The dimensions may vary according to specific lighting requirements. For example, for lower brightness intensity, fewer LEDs may be mounted upon the substrate, and accordingly the substrate may decrease in size. In other embodiments, other substrate materials may be used and other shapes and sizes may also be used, such as approximately ovoid or round.
In various embodiments, the silicon substrate 310 and/or flexible printed circuit (FPC) 340 may have a specified (e.g., controlled) color, or these surfaces may be painted or coated with a material of a specified (e.g., controlled) color. In some embodiments, it has been recognized that some light from LEDs 300 that enters lens 210 may escape from the backside of lens 210. This escaped light may reflect from silicon substrate 310 and/or flexible printed circuit (FPC) 340, enter lens 210 and be output from the front of lens 210. As a result light output from lens 210 may be tinted, colored, or affected by the color of silicon substrate 310 and/or FPC 340. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the surface coloring of these surfaces can be controlled. In some instances, the color may be whitish, bluish, reddish, or any other color that is desired. In various embodiments, portions of heat sink 230 may also have a controlled color for similar reasons. For example, the surface of heat sink 230 facing lens 210 may be painted or anodized in a specific color such as white, silver, yellow, or the like. This surface may have a different color compared to other surfaces of heat sink 230. For example, heat sink 230 may be bronze in color, and the inner surface of heat sink 230 facing lens 210 may be silver in color, or the like.
As shown in
As illustrated in
Illustrated in
Various shapes and sizes for FPC 340 can be used. For example, as illustrated in
In
After the electronic driving devices and the silicon substrate 310 are bonded to FPC 340, the LED package subassembly or module 220 is thus assembled. In various embodiments, these LED modules may then be individually tested for proper operation.
In various embodiments, the following process may be performed to form an LED assembly/module. Initially, a plurality of LEDs 300 are provided upon an electrically insulated silicon substrate 310 and wired, step 400. As illustrated in
Next, a plurality of electronic driving circuit devices and contacts may be soldered to the flexible printed circuit 340, step 430. The contacts are for receiving a driving voltage of approximately 12 VAC. As discussed herein, unlike present state of the art MR-16 light bulbs, the electronic circuit devices, in various embodiments, are capable of sustained high-temperature operation, e.g., 120 degrees C.
In various embodiments, the second portion of the flexible printed circuit including the electronic driving circuit is inserted into the heat sink and into the inner cavity of the base module, step 440. As illustrated, the first portion of the flexible printed circuit is then bent approximately 90 degrees such that the silicon substrate is adjacent to the recess of the heat sink. The back side of the silicon substrate is then bonded to the heat sink within the recess of the heat sink using an epoxy, or the like, step 450.
In various embodiments, one or more of the heat producing the electronic driving components/circuits may be bonded to the protrusion portion of the heat sink, step 460. In some embodiments, electronic driving components/circuits may have heat dissipating contacts (e.g., metal contacts) These metal contacts may be attached to the protrusion portion of the heat sink via screws (e.g., metal, nylon, or the like). In some embodiments, a thermal epoxy may be used to secure one or more electronic driving components to the heat sink. Subsequently a potting material is used to fill the air space within the base module and to serve as an under fill compound for the silicon substrate, step 470.
Subsequently, a reflective lens may be secured to the heat sink, step 480, and the LED light source may then be tested for proper operation, step 490.
In various embodiments, reflective lens 600 is monolithic and fabricated via a molding process. In other embodiments, reflective lens 600 may be fabricated via a molding and etching process. Reflective lens 600 may be formed from a transparent material such as Makrolon™ LED 2045 or LED 2245 polycarbonate available from Bayer Material Science AG. In various embodiments, a forward-facing side 635 and a rearward-facing side 645 define bounds of the transparent material forming reflective lens 600.
As shown by cross-section 630 of
In some embodiments of the present invention, for an MR-16 light source, there are approximately 180 (within a range of 150 to 200) prismatic structures (e.g., each prismatic structure is approximately 2 degrees). Accordingly, at the outer perimeter, the pitch between prisms is approximately 0.8 mm (within a range of 0.75 mm to 1 mm) Additionally, the peak to trough depth is approximately 0.4 mm (within a range of 0.3 mm to 0.5 mm). In other embodiments, the number of prismatic structures, the pitch, the depth, or the like may change depending upon a specific design.
In some embodiments, an internal angle of the prismatic structures is constant as measured by a tangent line along rearward-facing side 645. In some embodiments, the angles may be slightly less than 90 degrees (e.g., 85, 89, 89.5 degrees, or the like); the angles may be slightly more than 90 degrees (e.g., 90.5, 91, 95 degrees, or the like); or the angles may be approximately 90 degrees.
In some embodiments, the internal angles of the prismatic structures need not be constant, and may depend on a radial distance away from light receiving region. For example, near inner region 700, the angle may be slightly more than 90 degrees (e.g., 91, 95 degrees, or the like), and at outer region 710, the angle may be much larger than 90 degrees (e.g., 110, 120 degrees, or the like). In some embodiments, modification of the angle may help reduce or increase hotspots, reduce undesired voids, or modify the beam shape, as desired.
As illustrated in the example in
In operation, in various embodiments as illustrated in
In various embodiments, light blending region 660 changes the direction of light ray 740 received from region 650, to generally be directed toward region 650, e.g., light ray 750. Subsequently, at region 650, because of index of refraction mismatch, light ray 750 becomes light ray 760. In the example in
As shown in
In addition to TIR lenses, another class of lens is known as a “folded TIR lens”. Use of this type of lens allows the diameter of the lens to be larger while reducing the overall height, and thus, for a given form factor of an LED lamp (e.g., an MR-16 form factor) a fan can be included in the inner volume of the lamp without unduly sacrificing certain design objectives such as operating temperature, illumination uniformity, and/or light output efficiency.
In certain embodiments, an LED lamp is provided comprising a single LED package light source; a fan; and folded total internal reflection optic s to substantially direct light emitted from the single LED package light source.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Embodiments provided by the present disclosure include methods for providing a LED lamp in a compact form factor such as an MR-16 form factor. The methods include combining a single LED package light source and a fan, with a folded optic. The folded optic, which may be a totaling internally reflection optic, to direct light emitted from the single LED package light source. Devices disclosed herein can be combined to provide LED lamps having a small form factor.
In certain embodiments, an LED lamp comprises a single LED package light source; a fan; and a folded optic to substantially direct light emitted from the single LED package light source. In certain embodiments, the LED lamp is provided in a MR16 form factor. In certain embodiments, the folded optic comprises a total internal reflection lens. In certain embodiments, the folded optic is configured to direct light emitted by the single LED package light source in substantially one direction. In certain embodiments, the LED lamp comprises a hemispherical lens disposed adjacent the single LED package light source. In certain embodiments, the LED lamp comprises a reflector disposed on an area of the folded optic such that light emitted by the single LED light source is incident on the reflector. In certain embodiments, the reflector comprises an array of right-angle prisms.
In this example, a field angle 1620 is defined as the solid angle where the light intensity is at least one tenth of the peak light intensity, or the angle where the light intensity of a light source drops to about 10% of light source. For example, a light having intensity of 2000 candle power light will have a field angle measured where the light is reduced to about 200 candle power. The size of field angle 1620 depends upon the qualities of a light source desired by the user. For example, if a tight-narrow beam is desired, beam angle 1610 and field angle 1620 are small and very close to each other (e.g., 10 degrees and 15 degrees, respectively); and if a flood-light beam is desired, beam angle 1610 may be wide, for example, 30 degrees, and field angle 1620 may also be wider, for example 90 degrees. In various embodiments, the intensity of light outside beam angle 1610 typically decreases, as illustrated in spill light region 1630.
In various embodiments, light having uncontrolled or high light intensity outside a glare angle is defined herein as glare. In various embodiments, a glare region may range from about 30 degrees from the center axis to about 60 degrees from the center axis; in another example, a glare region may be directed upon light within a range of about 30 degrees from the center axis to about 45 or about 75 degrees from the center axis; in other embodiments, other ranges may also be considered and used. In certain embodiments, a center axis refers to the central geometric or physical axis of the lamp, such as the optical aperture. In certain embodiments, a center axis refers to the vector extending from the LED light source through the maximum intensity of the output light. In certain embodiments, these may be coincident. Eye discomfort of a user due to such light is very subjective. However, for purposes herein, light within the glare region having an intensity contrast ratio compared to the maximum intensity of greater than about 1:1000 is considered herein as glare. In other embodiments, other ratios may be used to indicate glare, for example, 1:2000, 1:10,000, or the like. In the example in
Similar to the embodiment illustrated in
In various embodiments, glare cap 1950 may include a magnet and a opaque plastic cap, may include only a metal cap, may include only a magnet, or other combinations. In light of the present patent disclosure, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many other embodiments for the glare cap are taught, and are within the scope of the present patent disclosure.
Similar to the embodiment illustrated in
In some embodiments, as illustrated in
Additionally, in various embodiments, a minimum distance 2055 may be maintained between the lens material (e.g., recessed peak 2050) and the underlying LED light source. In some cases, this minimum distance moves the LED light source outside of the central light receiving region 2040, as illustrated. This is in contrast to some of the prior art examples previously discussed. In some experiments, minimum distance 2055 is greater than about 0.3 mm. In cases where the distance is smaller than about 0.3 mm, the lens material has disadvantageously changed in properties, e.g., become less clear, yellowed, and the like. The change in lens material properties may be due to UV light, heat, or the like.
In
In this example, as shown on plot 2140, at 30 degrees off-axis, the light intensity is approximately 0.085 (2170). Comparing this light intensity (2170) to the normalized maximum light intensity of 100, the ratio is approximately 1:1200. Accordingly, because this light ratio at 30 degrees off-axis is lower than 1:1000, the light source using the glare cap does not produce glare at least 30 degrees off-axis. Based upon a similar analysis, the light source using the glare cap does not produce glare, all the way up to 90 degrees off-axis. In this example, the ratio of the lens diameter to the glare blocker is about 4.4:1.
In this example, an additional plot 2180 is shown. In this example, a 9.5 mm glare blocker is placed upon an 83 mm diameter lens light source. As can be seen, on plot 2180, at 30 degrees off-axis, the light intensity is approximately 0.4 (2190). Comparing this light intensity (2190) to the normalized maximum light intensity of 100, the ratio is approximately 1:400. Accordingly, because this light ratio at 30 degrees off-axis is higher than 1:1000, the light source using this diameter glare cap produces glare at least 30 degrees off-axis. Based upon a similar analysis, the light source using this glare cap produces glare, all the way up to about 56 degrees off-axis. In this example, the ratio of the lens diameter to the glare blocker is about 8.8:1.
In various embodiments, glare produced from a light source may also be completely eliminated if the glare cap entirely covered the front of the lens. However, in such a case no light would be output from the light source. Accordingly, appropriate sizes for a glare cap can be selected that reduce glare, yet not decrease the maximum intensity of the light, and/or the over-all light output. Surprisingly, introduction of a glare blocker can counter-intuitively increase the center beam intensity. In particular, Table 1 provides center beam intensity for an 83 mm diameter lens having different diameter glare blockers.
As demonstrated in Table 1, based upon experimental results, the center beam intensity is generally lower without a glare blocker. Further, the glare blocker diameter tested having the highest center beam intensity in this example is 19 mm. As also demonstrated in Table 1 the ratio of glare blocker to lens diameter is approximately 1:4.4 within this region. It is expected that further experimental data may show that other glare blocker diameters may provide even higher center beam intensities, e.g., 20 mm, 22 mm, 25 mm, or the like.
In
In
Based on the above experimental results, a more desirable range 2260 of glare blockers to lens diameter ratio has been determined. In certain embodiments, the optimal range surprisingly increases a maximum center beam intensity while reducing light intensity within a glare region (about 30 degrees to about 60 degrees) to less than 1:1000. In various embodiments the ratio is on the order of about 1:2.5 to about 1:5, 1:3 to about 1:4.5; about 1:2.8 to about 1:4.6; or the like.
Finally, it should be noted that there are alternative ways of implementing the embodiments disclosed herein. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive. Furthermore, the claims are not to be limited to the details given herein, and are entitled to their full scope and equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/894,203 filed on May 14, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/865,760 filed on Apr. 18, 2013, which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/707,757 filed on Sep. 28, 2012, and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/894,203 claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/646,766 filed on May 14, 2012; and this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/909,752 filed on Jun. 4, 2013, which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/776,173 filed on Mar. 11, 2013, and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/655,894 filed on Jun. 5, 2012; and this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/014,112 filed on Aug. 29, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/915,432 filed on Jun. 11, 2013, which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Application No. 61/659,386 filed on Jun. 13, 2012, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2953970 | Maynard | Sep 1960 | A |
3283143 | Gosnell | Nov 1966 | A |
3593021 | Auerbach | Jul 1971 | A |
3621233 | Ferdinand et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3874443 | Bayer, Jr. | Apr 1975 | A |
4165919 | Little | Aug 1979 | A |
4225904 | Linder | Sep 1980 | A |
4279463 | Little | Jul 1981 | A |
4293892 | Plummer | Oct 1981 | A |
5005109 | Carleton | Apr 1991 | A |
5764674 | Hibbs-Brenner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6116758 | Lin | Sep 2000 | A |
6204602 | Yang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6501154 | Morita et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
D471881 | Hegde | Mar 2003 | S |
6787999 | Stimac et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6864572 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889006 | Kobayashi | May 2005 | B2 |
6942368 | Kane et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6964877 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7207694 | Petrick | Apr 2007 | B1 |
D545457 | Chen | Jun 2007 | S |
7311417 | Lemke | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7318659 | Robling et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7344279 | Mueller et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7388751 | Hood et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7431071 | Wenger | Oct 2008 | B2 |
D581583 | Peng | Nov 2008 | S |
7458706 | Liu et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7488097 | Reisenauer et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506998 | Ansems et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
D592613 | Plonski et al. | May 2009 | S |
7631987 | Wei | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637635 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7658528 | Hoelen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663229 | Lu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674015 | Chien | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712922 | Hacker et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
D618634 | Lin et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
7744259 | Walczak et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
D619551 | Lin et al. | Jul 2010 | S |
7748870 | Chang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753107 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7800119 | He et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824075 | Maxik | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7824077 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7889421 | Narendran et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7972040 | Li et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7993025 | Chiu | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993031 | Grajcar | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7997774 | Liddle | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8042969 | Paik et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049122 | Watford | Nov 2011 | B2 |
D652564 | Maxik | Jan 2012 | S |
8153475 | Shum et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8157422 | Paik et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8164237 | Wen | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8206015 | Cho et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
D662899 | Shum et al. | Jul 2012 | S |
D662900 | Shum et al. | Jul 2012 | S |
8215800 | Plank | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8220970 | Khazi et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8227962 | Su | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8242669 | Qiu | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8272762 | Maxik et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8324835 | Shum et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
D674960 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
8390207 | Dowling et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8405947 | Green et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8414151 | Allen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8525396 | Shum et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8567999 | Paik et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579470 | Leahy et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
D694722 | Shum et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
8618742 | Shum et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8643257 | Shum et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8651711 | Rudisill et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8680787 | Veskovic | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8746918 | Rubino | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8752975 | Rubino | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8803452 | Shum et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8829774 | Shum et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8884501 | Cho et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8884517 | Shum et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8888332 | Martis et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20010021073 | Leggo et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020014535 | Okada et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020119702 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030039122 | Cao | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030058650 | Shih | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030107885 | Galli | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030183835 | Moku et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197807 | Wu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040222427 | Hsiung | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040264195 | Chang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050122690 | Hood et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174780 | Park | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050214992 | Chakraborty et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060028310 | Asano et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060175045 | Chen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060202851 | Cash et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060208091 | Nishizawa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060262545 | Piepgras et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274529 | Cao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070007898 | Bruning | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070158797 | Lee | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070228999 | Kit | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070284564 | Biwa et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002444 | Shekhawat et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049399 | Lu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080137 | Otsuki et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080123341 | Chiu | May 2008 | A1 |
20080142781 | Lee | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158887 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164489 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080266866 | Tsai | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272714 | Noble et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080315228 | Krames et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027878 | Metz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090072252 | Son et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090134421 | Negley | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154166 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161356 | Negley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175043 | Frick | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194252 | Lee et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090195186 | Guest et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231895 | Hu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237940 | Wu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090244899 | Chyn | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090303738 | Suss et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303762 | Jang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100060130 | Li | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061076 | Mandy et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066266 | Huang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091487 | Shin | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118148 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100148145 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100207502 | Cao et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207534 | Dowling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100244648 | Yoo | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264799 | Liu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277068 | Broitzman | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290229 | Meyer, Sr. et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100320499 | Catalano et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018418 | Yoo | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032708 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110056429 | Raring et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074270 | Van De Ven et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110095686 | Falicoff et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110140586 | Wang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169406 | Weekamp et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175510 | Rains, Jr. et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175528 | Rains, Jr. et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182065 | Negley et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110198979 | Shum et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204763 | Shum et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204779 | Shum et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204780 | Shum et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110215699 | Le et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242823 | Tracy et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260945 | Karasawa | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110298371 | Brandes et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309734 | Lin et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120018754 | Lowes | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120043552 | David et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120043913 | Melanson | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120161626 | van de Ven et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120187830 | Shum et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120212960 | Rodriguez | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120293062 | Pickard | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314403 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120319148 | Donofrio et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120320579 | Ferguson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130058099 | Shum et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130121390 | Chang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130322089 | Martis et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343062 | Shum et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140028214 | Mazumdar et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140091697 | Shum | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140146545 | Shum et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140175966 | Tan | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140268750 | Lui | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140313749 | Shum et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1849707 | Oct 2006 | CN |
2826150 | Oct 2006 | CN |
2009-75612 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101608746 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102149960 | Aug 2011 | CN |
203099372 | Jul 2013 | CN |
02-028541 | Jan 1990 | JP |
2000-517465 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2005-302483 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2011-501351 | Jan 2011 | JP |
M425985 | Apr 2012 | TW |
WO 2009048956 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009149263 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2009156969 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2011054716 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,489 dated Sep. 30, 2014 (7 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,142 dated Sep. 22, 2014 (25 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/856,613 dated Nov. 21, 2014 (8 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/909,752 dated Sep. 30, 2014 (9 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/014,112 dated Nov. 19, 2014 (24 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,597 dated Dec. 5, 2014 (9 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,936 dated Sep. 24, 2014 (7 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,043 dated Oct. 15, 2014 (11 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/211,606 dated Nov. 28, 2014 (18 pages). |
Tyagi et al., ‘Partial Strain relaxation via misfit dislocation generation at heterointerfaces in (Al,In)GaN epitaxial layers grown on semipolar (1122) GaN free standing substrates’, Applied Physics Letters 95, (2009) pp. 251905. |
Communication from the Chinese Patent Office re 2011800543977 dated Jan. 7, 2015 (13 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,767 dated Dec. 18, 2014 (17 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,423 dated Mar. 17, 2015 (22 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/441,108 dated Mar. 13, 2015 (7 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/469,709 dated Feb. 6, 2015 (5 pages). |
Haskell et al., ‘Defect Reduction in (1100) m-plane gallium nitride via lateral epitaxial overgrowth by hydride vapor phase epitaxy’, Applied Physics Letters 86, 111917 (2005), pp. 1-3. |
Nakamura, ‘Candela-Class High-Brightness InGaN/AlGaN Double-Heterostructure Blue-Light-Emitting Diodes’, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 64, No. 13, Mar. 1994, pp. 1687-1689. |
International Preliminary Report & Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/060030 dated Mar. 21, 2012, 11 pgs. total. |
CFL Ballast IC Drive LED, www.placardshop.com, Blog, May 22, 2012, 3 pgs. |
Thermal Properties of Plastic Materials', Professional Plastics, Aug. 21, 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Rausch, ‘Use a CFL ballast to drive LEDs’, EDN Network, 2007, pp. 1-2. |
Communication from the Japanese Patent Office re 2013532993 dated Jul. 9, 2014 (5 pages). |
Communication from the Japanese Patent Office re 2012191931, dated Oct. 11, 2013 (4 pages). |
Communication from the Chinese Patent Office re 201210322687.1 dated Mar. 3, 2014, (8 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/785,953 dated Apr. 12, 2012 (11 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/785,953 dated Jan. 11, 2013 (14 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,791 dated Nov. 25, 2011 (11 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,791 dated Feb. 20, 2013 (13 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,791 dated Jun. 17, 2013 (8 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,833 dated Dec. 14, 2011 (10 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,833 dated Jul. 12, 2012 (15 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,833 dated Apr. 26, 2013 (22 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,833 dated Oct. 11, 2013 (11 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,849 dated Mar. 15, 2013 (17 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,849 dated Sep. 16, 2013 (10 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,860 dated Dec. 30, 2011 (14 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,860 dated Jun. 8, 2012 (9 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,193 dated Oct. 3, 2013 (12 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,193 dated Mar. 31, 2014 (8 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,489 dated Sep. 6, 2013 (12 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,489 dated Mar. 27, 2014 (14 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,767 dated Oct. 25, 2013 (28 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,767 dated Apr. 29, 2014 (21 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,142 dated Aug. 1, 2013 (13 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,142 dated Nov. 14, 2013 (23 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,142 dated Feb. 25, 2014 (23 pages). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,422 dated Oct. 8, 2013 (10 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,422 dated Jul. 9, 2014 (7 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/399,523 dated Mar. 5, 2012 (7 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/399,524 dated Mar. 2, 2012 (8 pages). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/423,725 dated Jul. 19, 2013 (9 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61707757 | Sep 2012 | US | |
61646766 | May 2012 | US | |
61776173 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61655894 | Jun 2012 | US | |
61659386 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13894203 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14336276 | US | |
Parent | 13865760 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 13894203 | US | |
Parent | 13909752 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 13865760 | US | |
Parent | 14014112 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 13909752 | US | |
Parent | 13915432 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 14014112 | US |