The present invention relates to glass breakage detectors generally.
Various types of glass breakage detectors are known in the art. One major shortcoming of currently available glass breakage detectors is that they are typically installed and configured with parameters which typically do not include parameters specific to the installation site, such as, for example, specific acoustic conditions of the installation site.
The present invention seeks to provide an improved glass breakage detector system.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a glass breakage detection system including:
an audio sensor;
room-specific evaluation function generating functionality operative to generate at least one room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function based on at least one of at least one acoustic parameter characterizing a room in which the audio sensor is located and at least two of the following environmental parameters:
alarm generation functionality operative to receive outputs from the audio sensor and to generate a glass breakage alarm when the outputs from the audio sensor fulfill criteria established by the at least one room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function.
Preferably, the glass breakage detection system also includes acoustic parameter generating functionality operative to generate the at least one acoustic parameter characterizing the room in which the audio sensor is located.
Preferably, the glass breakage detection system also includes sound receiving functionality operative to receive received sounds in the room, the received sounds resulting from emitted sounds having traveled through the room, the acoustic parameter generating functionality being operative to generate the at least one acoustic parameter characterizing the room in which the audio sensor is located responsive to analysis of the emitted sounds and the received sounds.
Preferably, the glass breakage detection system also includes sound generating functionality operative to automatically generate the emitted sounds in the room. Additionally or alternatively, the emitted sounds are generated manually in the room by an operator of the glass breakage detection system.
Preferably, the analysis of the sounds includes analysis of at least one of the extent of the presence of acoustic reflections in the room, the extent of the presence of acoustic resonance in the room, and the amplitude modulation as a function of frequency occurring as sound passes from the at least one glass element to the audio sensor in the room.
Preferably, at least one of the environmental parameters is automatically obtained by a camera. Additionally or alternatively, at least one of the environmental parameters is calculated manually.
Preferably, the at least one room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function generated by the room-specific evaluation function generating functionality is transmitted to the alarm generation functionality by at least one of optic, acoustic and electronic transmission.
There is also provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for installing and operating a glass breakage detection system, the method including generating at least one room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function based on at least one of at least one acoustic parameter characterizing a room in which an audio sensor is located and at least two of the following environmental parameters:
receiving outputs from the audio sensor and generating a glass breakage alarm when the outputs from the audio sensor fulfill criteria established by the at least one room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function.
Preferably, the method also includes generating the at least one acoustic parameter characterizing the room in which the audio sensor is located. Preferably, generating the at least one acoustic parameter characterizing the room in which the audio sensor is located includes generating emitted sounds in the room, receiving received sounds in the room, the received sounds resulting from the emitted sounds after traveling through the room, and analyzing the emitted sounds and the received sounds.
Preferably, generating emitted sounds in the room is performed manually. Additionally or alternatively, generating emitted sounds in the room is performed automatically.
Preferably, analyzing the emitted sounds and the received sounds includes analyzing at least one of the extent of the presence of acoustic reflections in the room, the extent of the presence of acoustic resonance in the room, and the amplitude modulation as a function of frequency occurring as sound passes from the at least one glass element to the audio sensor in the room.
Preferably, at least one of the environmental parameters is automatically obtained by a camera. Additionally or alternatively, at least one of the environmental parameters is calculated manually.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
As seen in
at least one acoustic parameter characterizing said room in which said audio sensor is located; and
at least two of the following environmental parameters:
Glass breakage detection system 100 also preferably includes sound generating functionality 120 operative to generate emitted sounds in the room, and sound receiving functionality 122 operative to receive received sounds in the room, the received sounds resulting from the emitted sounds after traveling through the room. Acoustic parameter generating functionality 124 is preferably provided for analyzing the emitted sounds and the received sounds and, responsive thereto, for generating at least one acoustic parameter characterizing the room in which the audio sensor is located.
Analyzing the emitted sounds and the received sounds by acoustic parameter generating functionality 124 preferably includes analysis of at least one of:
the extent of the presence of acoustic reflections in the room;
the extent of the presence of acoustic resonance in the room; and
the amplitude modulation as a function of frequency occurring as sound passes from the at least one glass element to the audio sensor in the room.
As further seen in
It is appreciated that room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation functions generated by room-specific evaluation function generating functionality 110 are transmitted to alarm generation functionality 134. The transmission may be, for example, optic, acoustic or electronic.
Reference is now made to
As shown in
As described hereinabove with reference to
a size of room 200, as calculated using a length 220 and a width 222 of room 200;
a size of window 202, as calculated using a length 224 and a height 226 of window 202;
the glass type of window 202; and
a distance 230 between window 202 and glass breakage detector 210.
Reference is now made to
As shown in
As further shown in
It is a particular feature of the present invention that acoustic parameter generating device 250 is operative to analyze emitted sound wave 260 and a corresponding echo in the form of received sound wave 266 and, responsive thereto, to generate at least one acoustic parameter characterizing room 200, which acoustic parameter is employed in generating a room-specific evaluation function used by alarm generation functionality to ascertain whether an alarm should be sounded in response to a sound detected by glass breakage detector 210.
It is appreciated that acoustic parameter generating device 250 may be employed to generate a multiplicity of acoustic parameters during an installation phase of glass breakage detector 210, by analyzing a corresponding multiplicity of alternative sound waves emitted in varying directions and a respective multiplicity of echoes.
Turning now to
Reference is now made to
As shown in
As described hereinabove with reference to
a size of a room in which the audio sensor is located;
at least one size of at least one glass element in the room in which the audio sensor is located;
at least one type of the at least one glass element in the room in which the audio sensor is located; and
at least one distance between the at least one glass element and the audio sensor.
Subsequently, as further shown in
the extent of the presence of acoustic reflections in the room;
the extent of the presence of acoustic resonance in the room; and
the amplitude modulation as a function of frequency occurring as sound passes from the at least one glass element to the audio sensor in the room.
Thereafter, room-specific evaluation function generating functionality is preferably employed to generate a room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function (304). As described hereinabove, the room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function is based on at least one of the acoustic parameter and at least two environmental parameters. Concluding the installation phase, the room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function is then preferably transferred to the system (306). It is appreciated that the steps of the installation phase may be repeated, for example, for each glass element in the room.
Thereafter, in an operational phase, the audio sensor continuously monitors the room for acoustic events (308). Upon detecting an acoustic event in the room (310), the room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function is preferably employed by alarm generation functionality of the system to ascertain whether the acoustic event detected by the audio sensor fulfill criteria established by the room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function (312). Upon ascertaining that the event detected by the audio sensor fulfills criteria established by the room-specific audio signal alarm evaluation function, an alarm is sounded (314).
Reference is now made to
In the example of
EF=(ff*k1+f2*k2+f3*k3+ . . . +fn*kn)*C1*C2*C3 . . . *Cn, wherein:
f1, f2, f3, . . . fn are functions corresponding to electrical signals generated by electronic detection of an acoustic event of glass breakage;
k1, k2, k3, . . . k are coefficients [0≦k≦1] which have preferably been statistically or empirically proven to provide a correct weight of each of the electrical signals; and
C1, C2, C3 . . . Cn are factors associated with environmental parameters and acoustic parameters of the room in which the audio sensor is located.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In the example of
f1=P2/P1, wherein:
P1 is an area below the signal line of ES (
P2 is and area below the signal line of ES (
f2=S2/S1, wherein:
S1 is a calculated maximum value of the derivative [d(ES)/dt] (
S2 is a calculated maximum value of derivative [d(ES)/dt] between time points [t2, t3].
f3=P3/(P1+P2), wherein P1 and P2 are described hereinabove and wherein P3 is an area below the signal line of ES between time points [t4, t5], which are defined as points in time of the signal line ES corresponding to L4 described hereinabove.
Scaling factors C1, C2, C3 . . . Cn can be estimated or calculated values. Calculations can be performed based on measured installation parameters. For example, C1 may correspond to an echo factor of the room, as follows:
C1=[(Tmax−Tc)/Tmax]*M1+0.1
wherein:
Tc is the measured time interval between time points [t1, t5];
Tmax is a statistical maximum time interval between time points [t1, t5]; and
M1 is an empirical scaling coefficient.
C2 may correspond to a size of the glass window in the room. For example:
C2=1.0 for glass size between 30×30 cm and 50×50 cm;
C2=0.5 for glass area between 50×50 cm and 100×100 cm; and
C2=0.25 for glass area between 100×100 cm and 150×150 cm.
C3 may correspond to a distance between the glass window and the audio sensor, as follows:
C3=[1−(Dmax−Dc)/Dmax]*M3+0.1
wherein:
Dc is an estimated or measured distance between the glass window and the audio sensor;
Dmax is the maximum allowed distance between the glass window and the audio sensor; and
M3 is an empirical scaling coefficient.
C4 may correspond to a glass type. For example, this factor may vary between several discrete values as following:
C4=1.0 for laminated glass;
C4=0.5 for wired glass; and
C4=0.25 for plate or tempered glass.
C5 may correspond to a flex wave factor, which reflects the direction of the flex wave. The flex wave generated by the breakage of a glass pane may be positive (outside to inside) in which case an alarm should be sounded, or negative (inside to outside) in which case an alarm should not be sounded. Accordingly, C5 may have one of two values:
C5=1 under the condition that initially FMS2 (
C5=0 under the condition that initially FMS2 (
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove as well as modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not in the prior art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4668941 | Davenport et al. | May 1987 | A |
4853677 | Yarbrough et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5192931 | Smith et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5323141 | Petek | Jun 1994 | A |
5341122 | Rickman | Aug 1994 | A |
5471195 | Rickman | Nov 1995 | A |
5510767 | Smith | Apr 1996 | A |
5515029 | Zhevelev et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524099 | Rickman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5552770 | McMaster | Sep 1996 | A |
5640142 | Matatall, Jr. et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640143 | Myron et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5675320 | Cecic et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5796336 | Ishino et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5831528 | Cecic et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5917410 | Cecic et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6111957 | Thomasson | Aug 2000 | A |
6236313 | Eskildsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6351214 | Eskildsen et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6493687 | Wu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7302073 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7443289 | Smith | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7680283 | Eskildsen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7812855 | Babich et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8036063 | Smith et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8199608 | Piel et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010033227 | Eskildsen et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20050264413 | Eskildsen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070008125 | Smith | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024443 | Babich et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080310254 | Piel et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090040869 | Smith et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090073803 | Smith | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20130076506 | Smith et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130170323 | Smith | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0215685 | Mar 1987 | EP |
2023305 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2 605 223 | Jun 2013 | EP |
0002420 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Apr. 30, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2014/051125. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150194036 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |