This application is a U.S. National Stage patent application based on International Application PCT/EP2016/060561, filed May 11, 2016, which claims priority to European Patent Application 15168691.2, filed May 21, 2015, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell comprising as component (A) an electrode comprising lithium metal or lithium alloy, and lithium ion conductively connected thereto as component (B) a glass ceramic membrane comprising an amorphous phase, as component (C) a liquid electrolyte comprising at least one solvent and at least one lithium salt, as component (D) an electrode comprising sulfur as a cathode active species.
The present invention also relates to battery comprising a lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as defined herein. The present invention further relates to the use of a glass ceramic membrane as defined herein as a separator in (i) a lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell, or (ii) a battery comprising at least one lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell.
Rechargeable lithium-sulfur (Li/S) batteries are believed to be very promising alternative power sources for long driving range (>300 km) pure electric vehicles (PEV's) and plugin electric vehicles (PHEV) since current lithium-ion batteries (LIB) based on intercalation materials can potentially provide only energy densities up to 200 Wh kg−1. This novel type of battery system offers much higher energy density and is relatively inexpensive. Theoretical energy density values can approach 2500 Wh kg−1 with practical values of 500 to 600 Wh kg−1 assuming the complete electrochemical conversion of sulfur (S8) to lithium sulfide (Li2S). Therefore, Li/S batteries have been investigated for mobile and portable applications, especially high energy applications.
Lithium as anode material offers several advantages over other materials due to its negative electrochemical potential and in combination with other materials its wide electrochemical window, its light weight and thus highest gravimetric energy density among all metallic anode materials. The active cathode material in lithium-sulfur batteries consists of sulfur. Concentration of sulfur in the cathode can vary between 30 to 80 wt %. Due to the electronically insulation properties of sulfur the presence of further additives is required. As conductive additives carbon (20-60 wt %) and in order to ensure the mechanical integrity of the cathode layer additional binders (1-10 wt %) are employed.
Currently quick capacity fading and low sulfur utilization are the main obstacles for using Li/S as rechargeable system. Only about 50% or ˜800 mAhg−1 of 1672 mAhg−1 as theoretical capacity can be used. Reason is the “polysulfide shuttle” mechanism. The elemental sulfur molecules accept electrons during the first discharge process and are gradually converted from higher order to lower order polysulfides. Lower polysulfides with less than three sulfur atoms (Li2S3) are insoluble in the electrolyte so that the following reduction step to the insoluble and electronically non-conductive Li2S2 is hampered. Thus low discharge efficiencies are observed at rates higher than C/10. In addition, the polysulfides are not transformed to elemental sulfur during the charging cycles. Instead of being oxidized to sulfur in the final step, the higher order polysulfides constantly diffuse to the anode where they are being gradually reduced by the elemental lithium to lower polysulfides in a parasitic reaction. The soluble lower polysulfides then diffuse back to the cathode thus establishing the “polysulfide shuttle”. Insoluble lower polysulfides precipitate from the electrolyte and accumulate on the anode side. In summary, the mechanism reduces charge efficiency and causes corrosion on anode and cathode. As result Li/S batteries suffer from capacity fading and a lack of cycle lifetime. Typical state of the art Li/S battery systems can reach lifetimes of 50-80 cycles.
It was therefore an object of the present invention to provide a lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell showing improved capacity and cycle lifetime. This object is achieved by a lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein.
In a first aspect, the present invention therefore relates to a lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell comprising
as component (A) an electrode comprising lithium metal or lithium alloy,
and lithium ion conductively connected thereto
as component (B) a nanoporous glass ceramic membrane comprising an amorphous phase,
as component (C) a liquid electrolyte comprising at least one solvent and at least one lithium salt,
as component (D) an electrode comprising sulfur as a cathode active species.
Surprisingly it has been found that glass ceramic membranes comprising an amorphous phase provide good blocking of polysulfides and lithium dendrites. Without wishing to be bound to any theory, it is believed that in glass ceramics comprising an amorphous phase, the pores in between the ceramic crystals are closed. A nanoporous glass ceramic membrane comprising an amorphous phase for use according to the present invention can be prepared as described e.g. in DE 10 2011 013 018 B and in DE 10 2014 100 684.
In comparison, ceramics prepared by standard sintering have a remaining porosity that results in rapid growth of lithium dendrites and subsequent cell shorting. Such ceramics can only be used as very thick membranes, which will add strongly to cell polarization. Alternatively, the pores have to be blocked in an additional step, for example by polymer resin infusion. In comparison, the expedient melt synthesis by SCHOTT yields ceramics with intrinsic high density that can also be used as very thin films, e.g. down to 180 μm.
As used herein, a “nanoporous” glass ceramic membrane consists of a regular framework supporting a regular, porous structure. The average size of the pores is generally 100 nanometers or smaller.
An “amorphous phase” is a non-crystalline phase that lacks the long-range order characteristic of a crystal phase.
According to the present invention it is preferred that in the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein, the amorphous phase accounts for 5 to 40 vol-%, more preferably 5 to 30 vol-%, most preferably 10 to 25 vol-% of component (B).
According to the present invention it is also preferred that in the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein, component (B) has an average porosity of 40 vol-% or less, more preferably 30 vol-% or less, even more preferably 20 vol-% or less, most preferably 5 vol-% or less, and/or that component (B) has a porosity of at least 1 vol-%.
Average porosity can be measured, for example, using a mercury porosimeter. Briefly, average porosity can be determined by measuring the external pressure required to force a liquid (e.g., mercury) into a pore (e.g., against the opposing force of surface tension between the liquid and the pore). Those skilled in the art would be capable of selecting an appropriate range of external pressures based upon the particles selected.
As mentioned before, the expedient melt synthesis by SCHOTT yields ceramics with intrinsic high density that can also be used as very thin films.
According to the present invention it is therefore preferred that in the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein, component (B) has an average thickness of 500 μm or less, more preferably 400 μm or less, even more preferably 200 μm or less, further even more preferably 100 μm or less, most preferably 50 μm or less.
According to the present invention it is preferred that in the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein, component (B) fulfils one or more of the following criteria:
In the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein, the electrolyte may comprise one or more ionic electrolyte salts to provide ionic conductivity and one or more liquid electrolyte solvents, gel polymer materials, or polymer materials. Preferred non-aqueous electrolytes include organic electrolytes comprising one or more materials selected from the group consisting of liquid electrolytes, gel polymer electrolytes, and solid polymer electrolytes.
Non-aqueous liquid electrolyte solvents include, but are not limited to, non-aqueous organic solvents, which are preferably selected from the group consisting of N-methyl acetamide, acetonitrile, acetals, ketals, esters, carbonates, sulfones, sulfites, sulfolanes, aliphatic ethers, acyclic ethers, cyclic ethers, glymes, polyethers, phosphate esters, siloxanes, dioxolanes, N-alkylpyrrolidones, substituted forms of the foregoing, and blends thereof. Preferred acyclic ethers are selected from the group consisting of diethyl ether, dipropyl ether, dibutyl ether, dimethoxymethane, trimethoxymethane, dimethoxyethane, diethoxyethane, 1,2-dimethoxypropane, and 1,3-dimethoxypropane. Preferred cyclic ethers are selected from the group consisting of tetrahydrofuran, tetrahydropyran, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, 1,4-dioxane, 1,3-dioxolane, and trioxane. Preferred polyethers are selected from the group consisting of diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (diglyme), triethylene glycol dimethyl ether (triglyme), tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (tetraglyme), higher glymes, ethylene glycol divinylether, diethylene glycol divinylether, triethylene glycol divinylether, dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether, and butylene glycol ethers. Preferred sulfones are selected from the group consisting of sulfolane, 3-methyl sulfolane, and 3-sulfolene. Fluorinated derivatives of the foregoing may also be used as liquid electrolyte solvents. Mixtures of the solvents described herein can also be used.
Preferred mixtures of solvents are selected from 1,3-dioxolane and dimethoxyethane, 1,3-dioxolane and diethyleneglycol dimethyl ether, 1,3-dioxolane and triethyleneglycol dimethyl ether, and 1,3-dioxolane and sulfolane. The weight ratio of the two solvents in the mixtures preferably vary from about 5:95 to 95:5.
Preferred gel polymer electrolytes are selected from the group consisting of polyethylene oxides, polypropylene oxides, polyacrylonitriles, polysiloxanes, polyimides, polyphosphazenes, polyethers, sulfonated polyimides, perfluorinated membranes (NAFION resins), polydivinyl polyethylene glycols, polyethylene glycol diacrylates, polyethylene glycol dimethacrylates, derivatives of the foregoing, copolymers of the foregoing, crosslinked and network structures of the foregoing, and blends of the foregoing.
Preferred solid polymer electrolytes are selected from the group consisting of polyethers, polyethylene oxides, polypropylene oxides, polyimides, polyphosphazenes, polyacrylonitriles, polysiloxanes, derivatives of the foregoing, copolymers of the foregoing, crosslinked and network structures of the foregoing, and blends of the foregoing.
According to the present invention it is preferred that in the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein, the at least one lithium salt of component (C) is selected from the group consisting of LiNO3, LiPF6, LiBF4, LiClO4, LiAsF6, Li2SiF6, LiSbF6, LiAlCl4, lithium bis-oxalatoborate, LiCF3SO3, LiN(SO2F)2, LiC(CnF2n+1SO2)3, wherein n is an integer in the range of from 1 to 20, and (CnF2n+1SO2)mXLi with n being an integer in the range of from 1 to 20, m being 1 when X is selected from oxygen or sulfur, m being 2 when X is selected from nitrogen or phosphorus, and m being 3 when X is selected from carbon or silicon.
According to the present invention it is also preferred that in the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein, component (D) comprises elemental sulfur as electroactive material.
“Electroactive sulfur-containing materials,” as used herein, relates to cathode active materials which comprise the element sulfur in any form, wherein the electrochemical activity involves the breaking or forming of sulfur-sulfur covalent bonds. Preferred electroactive sulfur-containing materials are selected from elemental sulfur and organic materials comprising sulfur atoms and carbon atoms, which may or may not be polymeric. Organic materials include those further comprising heteroatoms, conductive polymer segments, composites, and conductive polymers.
Preferably, the sulfur-containing material, in its reduced form, comprises a polysulfide moiety, Sm, selected from the group consisting of covalent Sm moieties, ionic Sm moieties, and ionic Sm2− moieties, wherein m is an integer equal to or greater than 3. Preferably, m of the polysulfide moiety Sm of the sulfur-containing polymer is an integer equal to or greater than 6. More preferably, m of the polysulfide moiety Sm of the sulfur-containing polymer is an integer equal to or greater than 8. In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the sulfur-containing material is a sulfur-containing polymer. In another preferred aspect of the present invention, the sulfur-containing polymer has a polymer backbone chain and the polysulfide moiety Sm is covalently bonded by one or both of its terminal sulfur atoms as a side group to the polymer backbone chain. In yet another preferred aspect of the present invention, the sulfur-containing polymer has a polymer backbone chain and the polysulfide moiety Sm is incorporated into the polymer backbone chain by covalent bonding of the terminal sulfur atoms of the polysulfide moiety.
Preferably, the electroactive sulfur-containing material comprises more than 50% by weight of sulfur. More preferably, the electroactive sulfur-containing material comprises more than 75% by weight of sulfur. Most preferably, the electroactive sulfur-containing material comprises more than 90% by weight of sulfur.
The nature of the electroactive sulfur-containing materials useful in the practice of this invention may vary widely, as known in the art. In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the electroactive sulfur-containing material comprises elemental sulfur. In another preferred aspect of the present invention, the electroactive sulfur-containing material comprises a mixture of elemental sulfur and a sulfur-containing polymer.
According to the present invention it is preferred that the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein further comprises as component (E) a current collector contacting component (A).
Materials for the current collector are preferably selected from metals (e.g., copper, nickel, aluminum, passivated metals, and other appropriate metals); metallized polymers; electrically conductive polymers; polymers including conductive particles dispersed therein; and other appropriate materials. In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the current collector is deposited onto the electrode layer using physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, electrochemical deposition, sputtering, doctor blading, flash evaporation, or any other appropriate deposition technique for the selected material. Alternatively, the current collector might be formed separately and bonded to the electrode structure.
According to the present invention it is preferred that the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein further comprises as component (F) a carrier substrate contacting component (A) or contacting component (E).
The carrier substrate may be made from a polymeric material. For example, the carrier substrate may comprise a polyester such as a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (e.g., optical grade polyethylene terephthalate), polyolefins such as polypropylene and polyethylene (which may optionally be metalized), nylon, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl alcohol. Also, the carrier substrate may comprise a metal or a ceramic material.
According to the present invention it is preferred that in the lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein the carrier substrate is selected from the group consisting of polymer films, metalized polymer films, ceramic films and metal films.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a battery comprising at least one lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell as described herein.
In a further aspect, the present invention relates to the use of a glass ceramic membrane as defined herein as separator in (i) a lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell, or (ii) a battery comprising at least one lithium-sulfur electrochemical cell.
The present invention will be further described by the following non-limiting examples.
Preparation of Nanoporous Glass Ceramic Membranes Comprising an Amorphous Phase:
Li1.6Al0.5Ti0.95Ta0.5(PO3)4 (LATTP) glass ceramic was prepared by induction melting of raw materials in a quartz crucible at 1500° C.-1650° C. in air, as described previously in U.S. 2014/0057162. The raw material composition (in weight %) is as follows: 5.4% Al2O3 (source: Al(PO3)3), 5.2% Li2O (source: LiH2PO4), 45.9% P2O5 (including LiH2PO4 and Al(PO3)3), 3.9% SiO2, 23.2% Ta2O5 and 16.4% TiO2. The melt was cast onto a metal plate forming glassy plates of 3 mm- 8 mm in thickness and 30 mm-40 mm in diameter. Some of the glass was poured on a twin roller device to produce glass ribbons for powder production. The glass samples were annealed just below the glass transition temperature at 530° C. and slowly cooled to room temperature (rate 20° C./h). The resulting glass samples were dark, violet, with spontaneous crystallization occurring in few spots. Nucleation and crystallization temperatures were determined by differential thermal analysis and accordingly samples were annealed at 850-950° C. for 12 hours and slowly cooled to room temperature to form the glass ceramic used for our experiments. The main phase has a NASICON structure with nominal composition of Li1.6Al0.5Ti0.95Ta0.5(PO3)4, isostructural to LiGe2(PO4)3 and LiTi2(PO4)3. SiO2 (Cristobalite), observed as an impurity phase (<2% by weight) in the XRD spectrum, is possibly formed during the heat treatment step.
For the preparation of Ta-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) glass ceramic, technical grade raw materials were mixed in the following proportions (in weight %): 13.9% Li2O, 53.6% La2O3, 20.3% ZrO2 and 12.1% Ta2O5. Since this composition is highly corrosive, skull melting technology, was used. This technique uses a water cooled crucible (skull crucible) leading to the formation of a barrier layer of solidified melt between crucible and melt. The batch was preheated using a gas burner, then melted using high frequency induction heating. After stirring and homogenizing the melt, the induction heating was switched off, allowing the melt to cool slowly to room temperature. The resulting material was white to slightly yellow colored and highly crystalline with 100% cubic garnet crystalline phase (as determined by XRD). No impurity phases were detected. Bulk samples and powder material were prepared from the crystallized ingot using water-free preparation methods.
Polysulfide Shuttle:
The solid ion conductor is integrated in the Li/S battery set up as a separator between anode and cathode avoiding shot circuits but allows the transport of lithium ions during charging and discharging. The membrane itself is 180 μm thick made of LATTP glass ceramic. No binder or other conducting polymers are present within the used membrane.
Cell Setup:
Anode: Lithium metal
Liquid electrolyte: triethylene glycol dimethyl ether with 1M LiTFSI
Separation: LATTP-membrane
Cathode: sulfur-carbon
No further additive like e.g. LiNO3 was used in the electrolyte to block the polysulfide shuttle.
Results:
The Li/S cell was cycled with different current densities varied from 0.6 mA/cm2 up to 4 mA/cm2 in a voltage range from 1.8 V to 2.8 V. About 150 cycles (1 cycle is a charging and a discharging step) can be reached with this setup and increasing current densities. The solid ion conducting membrane is suppressing the polysulfide shuttle otherwise the cell would have been dead after 1-2 cycles.
Polysulfide Permeation:
Permeability of the membranes for polysulfides was also tested ex situ with a U-bend type diffusion setup.
Setup:
For diffusion measurements, the ceramic pellets were placed with the aid of a Teflon seal between two glass tubes (17 mm inner diameter) with attached glass joints. The tubes were fixed with a clamp. A glass cap with three additional joints was mounted on top of each of the tubes. The setup was purged with nitrogen. Through a septum, one tube was filled with a polysulfide solution (0.05 M Li2S6 in DOL/DME), the other with DOL/DME. Permeation of polysulfides into the solvents was followed optically and with a designated UV probe (measurement wavelength was 380 nm, ε=158 m2/mol).
Results:
Preparation of Sintered Ceramics (Comparative Example):
Li7La3Zr1.75Nb0.25O12 ceramic pellets were prepared by the following process:
Li—Li cell was built by placing Lithium foil of slightly smaller diameter than the pellet (⅞″ Li foil and 1″ pellet) on each side. The stack was placed in a clamping test kit and a pressure of 10 kg/cm2 was applied and maintained during the testing. The cycling was done at the rate of 0.01 mA/cm2. After a couple of cycles, dendrite formation was observed (sudden drop of voltage from up to ±0.5 V down to 1 mV).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15168691 | May 2015 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/060561 | 5/11/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/184750 | 11/24/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5648187 | Skotheim | Jul 1997 | A |
5919587 | Mukherjee et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961672 | Skotheim et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6225002 | Nimon | May 2001 | B1 |
6238821 | Mukherjee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6733924 | Skotheim et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6797428 | Skotheim et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6936381 | Skotheim et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7247408 | Skotheim et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7282296 | Visco et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7645543 | Visco et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7688075 | Kelley et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7771870 | Affinito et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785730 | Affinito et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7939198 | Mukherjee et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8076024 | Affinito et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8084102 | Affinito | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8087309 | Kelley et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105717 | Skotheim et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8197971 | Skotheim et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8264205 | Kopera | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8338034 | Affinito et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8415054 | Skotheim et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8603680 | Affinito et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617748 | Mikhaylik et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623557 | Skotheim et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8728661 | Skotheim et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8753771 | Skotheim et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8871387 | Wang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8936870 | Affinito et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8968928 | Wang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9005311 | Safont et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9005809 | Wilkening et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9034421 | Mikhaylik et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9040197 | Affinito et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9040201 | Affinito et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9065149 | Skotheim et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9077041 | Burnside et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9105938 | Scordilis-Kelley et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9214678 | Mikhaylik | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9397342 | Skotheim et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9419274 | Wilkening et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9490478 | Mikhaylik et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9531009 | Kumaresan et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9548492 | Affinito et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559348 | Kumaresan et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9577243 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9577267 | Scordilis-Kelley et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9653735 | Skotheim et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9653750 | Laramie et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9711784 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9728768 | Mikhaylik et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9735411 | Viner et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9742028 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9755268 | Fleischmann et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9780404 | Scordilis-Kelley et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9825328 | Du et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20010038941 | Sunano | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20040191617 | Visco et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050196672 | Mukherjee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060115579 | Mukherjee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070221265 | Affinito et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080318128 | Simoneau et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090035646 | Mikhaylik et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055110 | Kelley et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100028782 | Inda | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100239914 | Mikhaylik et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110006738 | Mikhaylik et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110014524 | Skotheim et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110053002 | Yamamura et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110068001 | Affinito et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070491 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070494 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076560 | Scordilis-Kelley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110159376 | Skotheim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110165471 | Skotheim et al. | Jul 2011 | A9 |
20110177398 | Affinito et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110206992 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110256450 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120048729 | Mikhaylik et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120052339 | Mikhaylik et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120052397 | Mikhaylik et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120070746 | Mikhaylik et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120082872 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120082901 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130164635 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130177821 | Tsuchida et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130244085 | Coors et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130244102 | Golodnitsky et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130316072 | Scordilis-Kelley et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130316218 | Dahlmann | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140057162 | Schneider et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140062411 | Mikhaylik et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079994 | Affinito et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140127419 | Fleischmann et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140127577 | Fleischmann et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140162138 | Fujiki | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140186678 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140272565 | Gronwald et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272594 | Safont et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272595 | Cristadoro et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272597 | Mikhaylik et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010804 | Laramie et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150044517 | Mikhaylik et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150086837 | Laramie et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150111104 | Engel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150162586 | Fleischmann et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180037 | Gronwald et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180084 | Scordilis-Kelley et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188194 | Mikhaylik et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150236320 | Laramie et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236322 | Laramie et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150280277 | Fleischmann et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150287986 | Affinito et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150287998 | Scordilis-Kelley et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150318539 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150349310 | Viner et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160072132 | Liao et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160118638 | Gronwald et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160118651 | Kovalev et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160149259 | Osada et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160190640 | Visco | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160301080 | Skotheim et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160329598 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344067 | Laramie et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170018815 | Laramie et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170047590 | Mikhaylik et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170141385 | Scordilis-Kelley et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170141402 | Affinito et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170141442 | Mikhaylik et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170149086 | Du et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170200975 | Liao et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170250390 | Laramie et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170288208 | Kelley et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170338475 | Laramie et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170352863 | Mikhaylik et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103490027 | Jan 2014 | CN |
2010-232085 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2013-051127 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2014-183021 | Sep 2014 | JP |
WO 2004036669 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2010149265 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2013128759 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013152030 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
WO2010149265translation (Year: 2018). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2016/060561 dated Jun. 20, 2016. |
Kai et al., New Generation of Li-ion battery technology. China National Defense Press. Aug. 2013:158-60. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180138542 A1 | May 2018 | US |