Glass composition for the manufacture of fibers and process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9546107
  • Patent Number
    9,546,107
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 18, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 17, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
Improved glass batch compositions and processes of fiberizing the compositions to form fibers are provided. The batch of the present composition can include: 40-60 wt % SiO2; 15-50 wt % Al2O3; 0-30 wt % MgO; 0-25 wt % CaO; 0-5 wt % Li2O; 0-9 wt % B2O3; and 0-5 wt % Na2O. The fibers formed of the compositions may have a Young's modulus of greater than 82.7 GPa (12 MPSI). The fibers may also have good biosolubility (kdis), of at least 100 ng/cm2/hour.
Description
BACKGROUND

Glass fibers for use in composite applications are manufactured from various raw materials combined in specific proportions to yield a desired chemical composition. This proportion is commonly termed a “glass batch.” The composition of the glass batch and the glass manufactured from it are typically expressed in terms of percentages of the components, which are expressed as oxides. SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, MgO, B2O3, Na2O, K2O, Fe2O3, and minor amounts of other oxides are common components of a glass batch. Numerous types of glasses may be produced from varying the amounts of these oxides, or eliminating some of the oxides, in the glass batch. Examples of such glasses that may be produced include E-glass, S-glass, R-glass, A-glass, C-glass, and ECR-glass. The glass composition determines the properties of the glass including properties such as the viscosity, the liquidus temperature, the durability, the density, the strength, and the Young's modulus of the glass. Non-physical considerations given to commercial glass compositions include the raw material cost and environmental impact caused by manufacturing the glass.


E-glass compositions are the most common glass compositions for making continuous glass fiber strands used in textile and reinforcement applications. One advantage of E-glass is that its liquidus temperature is approximately 200° F. below its forming temperature, which is commonly defined as the temperature at which the viscosity of the glass equals 1000 poise. E-glass has a wide range of forming temperatures and a low devitrification rate. Historically, commercial E-glass compositions possessed forming temperatures between 2150° F. and 2350° F. and liquidus values from approximately 100° F. to 250° F. below the forming temperature.


The most common high strength glass compositions for making continuous glass fiber strands are “S-Glasses.” S-Glass is a family of glasses composed primarily of the oxides of magnesium, aluminum, and silicon with a chemical composition that produces glass fibers having a higher mechanical strength than E-Glass fibers. S-glasses generally have compositions that were originally designed to be used in high-strength applications such as ballistic armor. Some examples of S-Glasses include XStrand® S, FliteStrand® S, and ShieldStrand® S by Owens Corning, having a Young's modulus of about 88 GPa. Another example is S-2 Glass® by AGY, which is an S-Glass that may have a Young's modulus of approximately 89.6 GPa (13 MPSI).


Many glasses having high mechanical strengths can be very costly to produce, because of their high forming temperatures and due to other process constraints. In addition, many glasses having high mechanical strength may not be soluble in biological fluids. The lack of solubility in biological fluids can limit the product forms that are acceptable to the customer. Thus, there remains a need in the art for improved glass compositions and methods of making such glasses that provide high mechanical strength having the advantage of being soluble in biological fluids.


SUMMARY

In some embodiments of the present invention, high modulus glass compositions that may be formed into fibers for use in composite materials are provided. In some embodiments, the composition of the present invention is based on the Eutectic composition: 48 wt % SiO2, 35 wt % Al2O3, and 17 wt % MgO. In other embodiments, the present composition includes: about 40-60 wt % SiO2; 15-50 wt % Al2O3; 0-30 wt % MgO; 0-25 wt % CaO; 0-5 wt % Li2O; 0-9 wt % B2O3; and 0-5 wt % Na2O. In some exemplary embodiments, the fibers formed of the compositions have a Young's modulus greater than about 82.7 GPa (12 MPSI), or about 89.6 GPa (13 MPSI), or about 96.5 GPa (14 MPSI). In other exemplary embodiments, the fibers formed of the compositions have a Young's modulus greater than 103.4 GPa (15 MPSI).


In yet some exemplary embodiments, the fibers formed of the compositions also are biosoluble. Biosolubility is a measure of the speed at which a material dissolves in biological fluid. For example, the fibers may have a fiber biosolubility that is greater than about 100 ng/cm2/hour. In other examples, it is possible to control the chemistry of the compositions to provide a fiber biosolubility of greater than about 200 ng/cm2/hour or even greater than about 300 ng/cm2/hour.


In yet other embodiments of the present invention, methods of forming fibers having a high modulus are provided. The methods may include, for example, using a traditional mineral wool process to form fibers from the compositions of the present invention. The methods may also include using a traditional glass fiber forming process.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention will now be described with occasional reference to the specific embodiments of the invention. This invention may, however, be embodied in different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the description of the invention and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.


Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as molecular weight, reaction conditions, and so forth as used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless otherwise indicated, the numerical properties set forth in the specification and claims are approximations that may vary depending on the desired properties sought to be obtained in embodiments of the present invention. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical values, however, inherently contain certain errors necessarily resulting from error found in their respective measurements.


In accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention, glass batch compositions useful for forming fibers are provided. Additionally, fibers formed from the glass batch compositions are also provided. Fibers formed using the compositions of the present invention may have a modulus substantially higher than the modulus of S-Glass fibers, such as XStrand®S, FliteStrand®S, and ShieldStrand®S, and S-2 Glass®. The fibers formed using the compositions of the present invention may also have high strengths.


Additionally, the glass batch compositions of the present invention may be used to produce fibers having a high modulus without the use of traditional melters that may employ platinum/rhodium alloy, as will be discussed further herein. In other embodiments, the glass batch compositions of the present invention may be formed in traditional melters, as will be discussed further herein.


In accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the compositions of the present invention may be based on the Eutectic composition: 48 wt % SiO2, 35 wt % Al2O3, and 17 wt % MgO. For instance, in some exemplary embodiments, the glass batch composition of the present invention includes about 40-60 wt % SiO2; 15-50 wt % Al2O3; 0-30 wt % MgO; 0-25 wt % CaO; 0-5 wt % Li2O; 0-9 wt % B2O3, and 0-5 wt % Na2O. In other exemplary embodiments, the glass composition includes about 45-55 wt % SiO2; 20-45 wt % Al2O3; 5-25 wt % MgO; 3-25 wt % CaO; 0-5 wt % Li2O; 0-5 wt % B2O3; and 0-5 wt % Na2O. In further exemplary embodiments, the glass composition includes about 45-55 wt % SiO2; 20-35 wt % Al2O3; 10-20 wt % MgO; 5-25 wt % CaO; 0-5 wt % Li2O; 0-5 wt % B2O3; and 0-5 wt % Na2O.


Other constituents may be added to improve the properties of the resulting fiber and/or to improve the processing or biosolubility of the glass. For example, the compositions may include about 5.0 or less weight % of additional compounds, such as oxides, for example. Exemplary oxides that may be included in the composition include K2O, P2O5, ZnO, ZrO2, SrO, BaO, SO3, F2, Ce2O3, BeO, SeO2, Y2O3, La2O3, TiO2 and Fe2O3, and combinations thereof as intentional additives or impurities, each being present in up to 5.0 weight %.


Additionally, components may be added to the batch composition, for example, to facilitate processing, that are later eliminated, thereby forming a glass composition that is essentially free of such components. Thus, for instance, minute quantities of components, such as “tramp” oxides, may be present as trace impurities in the raw materials providing the silica, calcia, alumina, and magnesia components in commercial practice of the invention or they may be processing aids that are essentially removed during manufacture. In some exemplary embodiments, such tramp oxides are present in less than about 5.0 weight %, or less than about 1.0 weight %.


In some embodiments, the fibers formed from the compositions described herein have a Young's modulus greater than about 82.7 GPa (12 MPSI). In other embodiments, the fibers from the compositions described herein may have a Young's modulus greater than about 89.6 GPa (13 MPSI). In yet other examples, the fibers formed from the compositions may have a Young's modulus greater than about 96.5 GPa (14 MPSI), and even greater than 103.4 GPa (15.0 MPSI).


In certain exemplary embodiments, the glass fibers formed of the batch compositions may be biosoluble, as measured by a biosolubility index (kdis). The biosolubility may be estimated using a published model for high alumina fibers. This model is published as an on-line calculator at http://fiberscience.owenscorning.com/kdisapp.html. For example, the fibers may have a fiber biosolubility that is greater than about 100 ng/cm2/hour. In some exemplary embodiments, the fibers have a fiber biosolubility of greater than about 200 ng/cm2/hour or even greater than about 300 ng/cm2/hour. In further exemplary embodiments, the fibers have a fiber biosolubility of greater than about 1000 ng/cm2/hour, greater than about 2000 ng/cm2/hour, or even greater than about 10,000 ng/cm2/hour. The biosolubility of the compositions allows the glass to be safely fiberized using the rotating wheels of the mineral wool process, or using other processes that are not traditionally used to form high modulus fibers. Additionally, the biosolubility of the fibers allow the production of fibers having small diameters using traditional reinforcement fiber forming processes.


In some exemplary embodiments, glass fibers formed from of the inventive batch composition disclosed herein have a density ranging from about 2.4 g/cc to about 3.0 g/cc. In other exemplary embodiments, the glass fibers formed of the inventive batch composition have a density from about 2.57 g/cc to about 2.97 g/cc.


Generally, continuous glass fibers are formed by passing molten glass material through a bushing. As the glass exits the bushing through very fine orifices, the glass is cooled, such as by water jets, and mechanically drawn onto a high speed winder. As the fibers are wound, tension causes the streams of molten glass to be pulled into thin fibrous elements called filaments. However, in some exemplary embodiments, the inventive glass fibers are discontinuous and may be formed using any known fiber forming process, such as, for example, a mineral wool process, a steam jet process, rotary process, flame attenuation, and the like.


In some exemplary embodiments, the mineral wool process includes any suitable melting furnace such as a cupola or a tank furnace (not illustrated) into which the batch components may be introduced and melted to form a molten material. Molten glass from the furnace flows into a cylindrical container that includes small holes. As the cylindrical container spins, horizontal streams of glass begin to flow out of the holes. The molten glass streams may be attenuated by a downward blast of air, hot gas, or both. In some exemplary embodiments, the fibers fall against one or more fiberizing rolls. A first fiberizing roll works to break up the molten material, forming fibers that may then be propelled to an optional second fiberizing roll. In some exemplary embodiments, the second fiberizing roll spins in a direction counter to that of the first roll and further breaks up the material to form finished fibers. In some exemplary embodiments, a jet of high pressure air may be again used between the first and second rolls to further attenuate the fibers.


In some exemplary embodiments, the fibers may have a sizing composition applied as they leave the rolls or may be collected and have a sizing composition applied in a post manufacturing process. It will be understood that any suitable sizing composition may be used to size the fibers, and the sizing composition may be selected to be compatible with the particular resin system of a composite article made using the fibers. It will be understood by those having skill in the art, that any suitable discontinuous fiber forming process may be used to form the fibers. When a discontinuous process is employed to form fibers, the fibers produced from the discontinuous process may have dimensions that allow the fibers to be respirable. Particularly, during air attenuation, the discontinuous fibers may run the risk of being released into the air, becoming respirable fibers. It is an advantage of the present invention that any respirable fibers produced from the discontinuous processes exhibit a biosolubility with kdis greater than 100 ng/cm2/hour, such that the fibers are soluble in biological fluids.


It will be understood that other fiberizing processes may be useful to form fibers from the glass batch compositions. For example, some embodiments of the glass composition may be formed using a traditional glass forming processes employed to produce continuous fibers. For example, a traditional direct melt process may be used, and the fibers may be formed through any suitable bushing, such as a platinum or platinum/rhodium bushings, and wound on a winder. In other embodiments, the fibers may be formed using traditional batch processes. For example, the fibers may be formed using a platinum lined melter and produced with the use of any suitable bushings. When the fibers are formed using a bushing, the fiber diameters may be controlled to produce continuous fibers having a desired diameter. It is an advantage of the present invention that continuous fibers having very small diameters, while exhibiting biosolubility, strength, and modulus, may be formed.


The fibers of the present invention may be used as reinforcements in composite articles formed using any suitable resin, to form fabrics useful in forming composite articles, or for any other purpose.


Examples

The present invention will be better understood by reference to the following examples which are offered by way of illustration not limitation. Fibers having the compositions listed in Tables I-A-I-I include the constituents listed by weight percent. (Please note that * indicates a predicted value).
















TABLE I-A






Ex. 1
Ex. 2
Ex. 3
Ex. 4
Ex. 5
Ex. 6
Ex. 7






















SiO2
48
51
45
45
45
51
49


Al2O3
35
31
32
37
31
31
31


MgO
17
15
15
18
19
15
15


CaO
0
3
5
0
5
0
5


Na2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Li2O
0
0
3
0
0
3
0


B2O3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)
2681
2591
2473
2712
2646
2530
2585


° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)
2507
2290
2216
2561
2510
2232
2379


° F.









Liquidus (° F.)
2668
2600
2728
2788
2720
2659
2682


Density (g/cc)
2.660
2.651
2.664
2.692
2.722
2.598
2.673


Elastic
101.4
98.3
100.2*
104.9
101.5*
98.0
98.7


Modulus (GPa)









kdis (ng/cm2/hr)
1690
241
12730*
2038
4641*
936
621*























TABLE I-B






Ex. 8
Ex. 9
Ex. 10
Ex. 11
Ex. 12
Ex. 13
Ex. 14






















SiO2
48
45
45
45
45
46
51


Al2O3
37
31
31
31
34
31
31


MgO
15
21
16
21
21
15
18


CaO
0
3
5
0
0
5
0


Na2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Li2O
0
0
3
3
0
3
0


B2O3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)
2635
2470
2278
2503
2619
2439
2578


° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)
2368
2198
1919
2258
2443
2165
2274


° F.









Liquidus (° F.)
2784
2736
2723
2769
2772
2682
2652


Density (g/cc)
2.657
2.725
2.672
2.672
2.710
2.660
2.654


Elastic
101.6*
101.8
99.8
103.3*
104.4*
99.9
100.2


Modulus (GPa)









kdis (ng/cm2/hr)
527*
7,447
10,802
17489*
3634*
10,998
219























TABLE I-C






Ex. 15
Ex. 16
Ex. 17
Ex. 18
Ex. 19
Ex. 20
Ex. 21






















SiO2
45
45
48
51
45
46.6
45.1


Al2O3
37
35
31
34
37
34.0
32.9


MgO
15
15
21
15
15
16.5
16.0


CaO
0
5
0
0
3
0
0


Na2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Li2O
3
0
0
0
0
0
0


B2O3
0
0
0
0
0
3
6


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)
2718
2520
2480
2642
2520




° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)
2554
2212
2166
2334
2205




° F.









Liquidus (° F.)
2801
2690
2638
2734
2755




Density (g/cc)
2.637
2.703
2.695
2.637
2.695
2.635
2.606


Elastic
102.9
101.1
102.2
99.3*
102.3*
98.9
95.4


Modulus









(GPa)









kdis
7526*
2518
2025
186
2144
950
1025


(ng/cm2/hr)






























TABLE I-D






Ex. 22
Ex. 23
Ex. 24
Ex. 25
Ex. 26
Ex. 27
Ex. 28






















SiO2
43.7
53
40
40
40
40
49


Al2O3
31.9
28
46
28
28
35
28


MgO
15.5
19
11
23
17
7
23


CaO
9.0
0
0
9
15
15
0


Na2O
0
0
3
0
0
3
0


Li2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


B2O3
9
0
0
0
0
0
0


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)

2627
2641*
2415
2606
2376
2536


° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)

2318
2476*
2226*
2409
2248
2370


° F.









Liquidus (° F.)

2633
>2820
>2772
2743
2694
2547


Density (g/cc)
2.578
2.641
2.667
2.799
2.796
2.704
2.699


Elastic
92.0
98.3
104.3*
103.6*
99.9*
90.9
101


Modulus









(GPa)









kdis
1680
83.6
9307*
75847*
61329*
11320
1449


(ng/cm2/hr)






























TABLE I-E






Ex. 29
Ex. 30
Ex. 31
Ex. 32
Ex. 33
Ex. 34
Ex. 35






















SiO2
40
44
53
53
40
53
40


Al2O3
38
46
40
28
28
28
46


MgO
7
7
7
16
23
7
7


CaO
15
0
0
0
6
12
4


Na2O
0
3
0
3
3
0
3


Li2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


B2O3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)
2559*
2717*
2789*
2657
2428*
2746
2652*


° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)
2355*
2510*
2507*
2430
2230*
2413
2472*


° F.









Liquidus (° F.)
2707
>2842
>2833
2449
>2830
2548
>2816


Density (g/cc)
2.731
2.630
2.579
2.596
2.751
2.634
2.666


Elastic
99.1*
100.8*
97.1*
93.3
102.0*
90.5
101.8*


Modulus









(GPa)









kdis
15041*
1246*
28*
55.9
94454*
71
8077*


(ng/cm2/hr)






























TABLE I-F






Ex. 36
Ex. 37
Ex. 38
Ex. 39
Ex. 40
Ex. 41
Ex. 42






















SiO2
50
47
40
40
40
40
40


Al2O3
28
28
46
28
34
46
37


MgO
7
7
14
14
23
7
23


CaO
15
15
0
15
0
7
0


Na2O
0
3
0
3
3
0
0


Li2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


B2O3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)
2657
2709
2620*
2416
2488*
2639*
2505*


° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)
2342
2364
2474*
2236
2316*
2468*
2354*


° F.









Liquidus (° F.)
2606
2487
>2820
2714
>2832
>2843
>2836


Density (g/cc)
2.675
2.676
2.723
2.754
2.713
2.702
2.748


Elastic
91.0
89.6
107.8*
96.4*
105.2*
103.4*
108.5*


Modulus









(GPa)









kdis
380
5692
8311*
68677*
50264*
6486*
29444*


(ng/cm2/hr)






























TABLE I-G






Ex. 43
Ex. 44
Ex. 45
Ex. 46
Ex. 47
Ex. 48
Ex. 49






















SiO2
46
40
40
40
50
40
40


Al2O3
28
50
30
25
25
25
50


MgO
23
0
0
10
25
5
5


CaO
0
5
25
25
0
25
0


Na2O
3
5
5
0
0
5
5


Li2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


B2O3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)
2615
2720*
2563
2352
2491
2399
2706*


° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)
2412
2526*
2226
2107
2209
2089
2530*


° F.









Liquidus (° F.)
2655
>2831
2372
2436
2517
2304
>2822


Density (g/cc)
2.687
2.649
2.719
2.817
2.699
2.759
2.754


Elastic
100.5*
98.5*
87.1
93.6
101.0
89.0
101.6*


Modulus









(GPa)









kdis
5720*
4792*
36980
36109
2580
32428
5720*


(ng/cm2/hr)






























TABLE I-H






Ex. 50
Ex. 51
Ex. 52
Ex. 53
Ex. 54
Ex. 55
Ex. 56






















SiO2
40
50
45
45
40
40
40


Al2O3
50
25
25
25
30
25
35


MgO
0
0
0
25
25
25
0


CaO
10
25
25
0
0
5
25


Na2O
0
0
5
5
5
5
0


Li2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


B2O3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)
2698*
2650
2538
2499
2451*
2401*
2548*


° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)
2519*
2332
2221
2200
2263*
2192*
2306*


° F.









Liquidus (° F.)
>2819
2657
2343
2733
>2813
>2828
2755


Density (g/cc)
2.965
2.699
2.709
2.687
2.709
2.743
2.738


Elastic
101.2*
84.9
84.5
99.3*
103.2*
100.5*
93.1*


Modulus









(GPa)









kdis
3324*
478
28518
15547*
95099*
160870*
16092*


(ng/cm2/hr)






























TABLE I-I






Ex. 57
Ex. 58
Ex. 59
Ex. 60
Ex. 61
Ex. 62
Ex. 63






















SiO2
40
55
40
52
56
46
42


Al2O3
35
25
25
22
20
37
42


MgO
25
20
25
26
24
17
16


CaO
0
0
10
0
0
0
0


Na2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Li2O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


B2O3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Viscosity (log 2.0 estimate)
2479*
2630
2379*






° F.









Viscosity (log 3.0 estimate)
2328*
2324
2185*
1342.93

1390.66
1364.82


° F.









Liquidus (° F.)
>2835
2549
2822
1353.89

1498.89
1567.22


Density (g/cc)
2.788
2.631
2.817
2.70

2.68
2.71


Elastic
108.6*
97.0
103.2*






Modulus









(GPa)









Log k-dis
39001*
41
111603*






(ng/cm2/hr)
















The fibers of the above Examples were formed using a one hole bushing in a lab scale melter. The Young's modulus was measured using the well established sonic technique whereby the speed of sound is measured in an individual fiber. Pristine fiber strengths were measured by pulling pristine fibers from a one-hole bushing and measuring the breaking stress over a 2-inch gauge length. The biosolubility was estimated using a published model for high alumina fibers. This model is published as an on-line calculator at http://fiberscience.owenscorning.com/kdisapp.html.


It should be understood that where small quantities of components are specified in the compositions, for example, quantities on the order of about 2.0 weight percent or less, those components may be present in the form of trace impurities present in the raw materials, rather than intentionally added.


The present invention should not be considered limited to the specific examples described herein, but rather should be understood to cover all aspects of the invention. Various modifications, equivalent processes, as well as numerous structures and devices to which the present invention may be applicable will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. Those skilled in the art will understand that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, which is not to be considered limited to what is described in the specification.

Claims
  • 1. Glass fibers formed from a composition comprising: 40.0-54.0 wt. % SiO2;31.0-50.0 wt. % Al2O3;15.0-30.0 wt. % MgO;0-14.0 wt. % CaO;0-5.0 wt. % Na2O;0-1.0 wt. % Fe2O3;0-1.0 wt. % TiO2;0-5.0 wt. % Li2O; and0-9.0 wt. % B2O3,wherein the glass fibers are biosoluble with a kdis greater than 100.0 ng/cm2/hour.
  • 2. The glass fibers of claim 1, wherein the glass fibers have a kdis greater than 300.0 ng/cm2/hour.
  • 3. The glass fibers of claim 2, wherein the glass fibers have a kdis greater than 1,000 ng/cm2/hour.
  • 4. The glass fibers of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises: 45.0-51.0 wt. % SiO2;31.0-45.0 wt. % Al2O3;15.0-25.0 wt. % MgO;3-9.0 wt. % CaO;0-5.0 wt. % Na2O;0-1.0 wt. % Fe2O3;0-1.0 wt. % TiO2;0-5.0 wt. % Li2O; and0-5.0 wt. % B2O3.
  • 5. The glass fibers of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises: 45.0-49.0 wt. % SiO2;31.0-25.0 wt. % Al2O3;15.0-20.0 wt. % MgO;5-9.0 wt. % CaO;0-5.0 wt. % Li2O;0-1.0 wt. % Fe2O3;0-1.0 wt. % TiO2;0-5.0 wt. % Na2O; and0-5.0 wt. % B2O3.
  • 6. The glass fibers of claim 1, wherein the glass fibers have a Young's modulus greater than 82.7 GPa.
  • 7. The glass fibers of claim 6, wherein the glass fibers have a Young's modulus greater than 89.6 GPa.
  • 8. The glass fibers of claim 1, wherein the glass fibers have a density from 2.4 to 3.0 g/cc.
  • 9. Biosoluble glass fibers formed from a composition comprising: 40.0-54.0 wt. % SiO2;31.0-50.0 wt. % Al2O3;15.0-30.0 wt. % MgO;0-14.0 wt. % CaO;0-5.0 wt. % Na2O;0-1.0 wt. % Fe2O3;0-1.0 wt. % TiO2;0-5.0 wt. % Li2O; and0-9.0 wt. % B2O3,wherein the biosoluble glass fibers have a Young's modulus greater than 82.7 GPa.
  • 10. The biosoluble glass fibers of claim 9, wherein the biosoluble glass fibers are suitable for reinforcing a composite.
  • 11. The biosoluble glass fibers of claim 9, wherein the biosoluble glass fibers are formed by a mineral wool process.
  • 12. The biosoluble glass fibers of claim 9, wherein the biosoluble glass fibers have a Young's modulus greater than 89.6 GPa.
  • 13. The biosoluble glass fibers of claim 9, wherein the biosoluble glass fibers have a kdis greater than 200.0 ng/cm2/hour.
  • 14. The biosoluble glass fibers of claim 13, wherein the biosoluble glass fibers have a kdis greater than 300.0 ng/cm2/hour.
  • 15. A method of forming glass fibers, the method comprising: providing a glass batch comprising: 40.0-54.0 wt. % SiO2;31.0-50.0 wt. % Al2O3;15.0-30.0 wt. % MgO;0-14.0 wt. % CaO;0-5.0 wt. % Na2O;0-1.0 wt. % Fe2O3;0-1.0 wt. % TiO2;0-5.0 wt. % Li2O; and0-9.0 wt. % B2O3, andfiberizing the glass batch using a mineral wool process to form the glass fibers,wherein the glass fibers are biosoluble with a kdis greater than 100.0 ng/cm2/hour.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the glass fibers have a kdis greater than 200.0 ng/cm2/hour.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the glass fibers have a kdis greater than 300.0 ng/cm2/hour.
  • 18. The method of claim 15, wherein the glass fibers have a density from 2.4 to 3.0 g/cc.
  • 19. The method of claim 15, wherein the glass fibers have a Young's modulus greater than 82.7 GPa.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is the U.S. national phase entry of PCT/US2013/065554, filed on Oct. 18, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application No. 61/715,494, filed on Oct. 18, 2012, titled GLASS COMPOSITION FOR THE MANUFACTURING OF FIBERS AND PROCESS, both of which are incorporated by reference in its their entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2013/065554 10/18/2013 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2014/062987 4/24/2014 WO A
US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
3904424 Aoki Sep 1975 A
5312806 Mogensen May 1994 A
5932500 Jensen et al. Aug 1999 A
6156683 Grove-Rasmussen et al. Dec 2000 A
20050085369 Jensen Apr 2005 A1
20080182317 Maquin et al. Jul 2008 A1
20110172077 Lewis Jul 2011 A1
20140128530 Yang May 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
218012 Nov 1941 CH
1026928 Mar 1958 DE
29515168 Apr 1996 DE
1157974 Nov 2001 EP
2354104 Aug 2011 EP
2778399 Nov 1999 FR
1209244 Oct 1970 GB
50006823 Jan 1975 JP
50098914 Aug 1975 JP
366165 Mar 1973 SU
9614274 May 1996 WO
9722563 Jun 1997 WO
9823547 Jun 1998 WO
11113303 Sep 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US13/065554 dated Nov. 5, 2014.
Sebdani, Maryam M. et al., “Effect of divalent cations and DiO2 on the crystallization behavior of calcium aluminate glasses”, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 413, pp. 20-23, 2015.
Lee, In-Ho et al., “Effects of magnesium content on the physical, chemical and degradation properties in a MgO—Ca2—Na2O—P2O5 glass system”, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 363, pp. 57-63, 2013.
Prokhorenko, Oleg A., “Finding Optimal Glass Compositions”, 73rd Conference on Glass Problems, The Americal Ceramic Society, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 27-41, 2013.
The Properties of Glass, Second Edition, by George W. Morey, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, 1954, cover page and pp. 396-405.
Priven, A.I., “Calculation of the Viscosity of Glass-forming Melts: II. The MgO—CaO—SrO—BaO—Al2O3—SiO2 System”, Glass Physics and Chemistry, vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 416-428, 1997.
Introduction to Glass Science and Technology, James E. Shelby, cover page and back page, pp. 196-197, 1997.
Fundamentals of Inorganic Glasses, Arun K. Varshneya, Academic Press, Inc., Harcourt Brace & Company, Publishers, title page, pp. 156-159, 1994.
Fiberglass and Glass Technology, Energy-Friendly Compositions and Applications, Frederick T. Wallenberger, Paul A. Bingham, Editors, front and back cover, pp. 14, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150259243 A1 Sep 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61715494 Oct 2012 US