Patent Application
20160190361
This invention relates to glass compositions for use in forming an electroconductive paste composition. In one aspect of the invention, an electroconductive paste composition utilized in solar panel technology includes conductive metallic particles, an organic vehicle, and a glass composition comprising tellurium oxide (TeO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), and lithium oxide (Li2O).
Solar cells are devices that convert the energy of light into electricity using the photovoltaic effect. Solar power is an attractive green energy source because it is sustainable and produces only non-polluting by-products. Accordingly, a great deal of research is currently being devoted to developing solar cells with enhanced efficiency while continuously lowering material and manufacturing costs. In operation, when light hits a solar cell, a fraction of the incident light is reflected by the surface and the remainder is transmitted into the solar cell. The photons of the transmitted light are absorbed by the solar cell, which is usually made of a semiconducting material such as silicon. The energy from the absorbed photons excites electrons of the semiconducting material from their atoms, generating electron-hole pairs. These electron-hole pairs are then separated by p-n junctions and collected by conductive electrodes applied on the solar cell surface.
Solar cells typically have electroconductive pastes applied to both their front and back surfaces. A typical electroconductive paste contains conductive metallic particles, glass frit, and an organic vehicle. A front side paste, which often includes silver, is applied to the front side of the substrate to serve as a front electrode. In some instances, the glass frit etches through an antireflection coating, such as a silicon nitride coating, on the surface of the silicon substrate upon firing, helping to build electrical contact between the conductive particles and the silicon substrate. On the other hand, it is desirable that the glass frit is not so aggressive that it shunts the p-n junction after firing. For example, glass frits which include relatively high amounts of lead and bismuth oxide may damage the antireflection layer and degrade the p-n junction of the substrate. As a result, the electrical performance of the solar cell may be jeopardized. In addition, glass frits are known to have wide melting temperature ranges, making their behavior strongly dependent on their composition and processing parameters. As such, the ability to predict glass processing parameters and behavior under fast firing processes is difficult with known glass frits. Furthermore, because lead and bismuth are environmentally toxic elements, it is desirable to reduce or eliminate their use in electroconductive pastes. Conventional electroconductive pastes must also adhere well to the underlying substrate so as to be mechanically and structurally sound.
Thus, glass compositions which improve electrical contact between the electroconductive paste and the underlying substrate so as to achieve improved solar cell efficiency by improving emitter quality are desired. An improved overall cell performance is also expressed by, for example, higher short circuit voltage, lower series resistance, better adhesion of the electrode to the substrate, and higher current. Such glass compositions should not be so aggressive that they damage the antireflection layer and p-n junction. Further, glass compositions which reduce or eliminate the presence of toxic lead and bismuth oxide are desirable for environmental and health purposes. Additionally, glass frits with broader processing windows and more predictable melt behavior are desired. Lastly, glass frits which improve adhesion of the electroconductive paste to the underlying silicon substrate are desirable.
One aspect of the invention relates to an electroconductive paste composition comprising conductive metallic particles, at least one glass composition comprising at least about 70 wt % of tellurium oxide (TeO2), zinc oxide (ZnO) and lithium oxide (Li2O), collectively, based upon total weight of the glass composition, and an organic vehicle vehicle. The at least one glass composition preferably comprises less than about 5 wt % of bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) and lead oxide (PbO). When Bi2O3 is present in the glass composition, the weight ratio of Bi2O3 to ZnO is preferably less than about 0.15. The at least one glass composition preferably includes at least 2 wt % Li2O, based upon the total weight of the glass composition.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an electroconductive paste composition comprising conductive metallic particles, at least one glass composition comprising tellurium oxide (TeO2), zinc oxide (ZnO) and more than about 1 wt % lithium oxide (Li2O), based upon total weight of the glass composition, and an organic vehicle. The total amount of TeO2, ZnO and Li2O in the at least one glass composition is at least about 70 wt %, based upon total weight of the glass composition, and the weight ratio of (a) TeO2 to (b) ZnO and Li2O is in the range of about 1-25, preferably about 2-15. The at least one glass composition comprises preferably less than about 5 wt % of bismuth oxide (Bi2O3), more preferably less than about 2.5 wt % (e.g., less than about 2.0 wt %), and lead oxide (PbO). The at least one glass composition preferably includes at least 2 wt % Li2O, based upon the total weight of the glass composition.
Another aspect of the invention relates to an electroconductive paste composition comprising conductive metallic particles, at least one glass composition comprising tellurium oxide (TeO2), zinc oxide (ZnO) and more than about 1 wt % lithium oxide (Li2O), based upon total weight of the glass composition, and an organic vehicle. The total amount of TeO2, ZnO and Li2O in the at least one glass composition is at least about 70 wt %, based upon total weight of the glass composition, and the weight ratio of ZnO to Li2O is in the range of about 0.5-25, preferably about 1-20. In a preferred embodiment, the glass compositions includes more than 1.0 wt % Li2O (.e.g, at least 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, or 2.0 wt %). In one embodiment, the weight ratio of ZnO to Li2O is in the range of about 1-25 and preferably about 2-15. The combined content of bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) and lead oxide (PbO) in the at least one glass composition is preferably less than about 5 wt %, and more preferably less than about 2.5 wt % (e.g., less than about 2.0 wt %), based upon 100% total weight of the glass composition.
A further aspect of the invention is an electroconductive paste composition comprising conductive metallic particles, at least one glass composition comprising tellurium oxide (TeO2), zinc oxide (ZnO) and lithium oxide (Li2O), and an organic vehicle. The weight ratio of (a) Li2O to (b) the combined amount of TeO2 and Li2O is in the range of about about 0.001-0.3 (preferably about 0.001-0.15) and the weight ratio of (a) ZnO to (b) the combined amount of TeO2 and ZnO is in the range of about 0.001-0.35, preferably about 0.005-0.35. The combined content of bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) and lead oxide (PbO) in the at least one glass composition is preferably less than about 5 wt %, more preferably less than about 2.5 wt % (e.g., less than about 2.0 wt %). In a preferred embodiment, the glass compositions includes more than 1.0 wt % Li2O (.e.g, at least 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, or 2.0 wt %).
The invention also provides a solar cell produced by applying an electroconductive paste composition of the invention to a silicon wafer and firing the silicon wafer. A further aspect of the invention is a solar cell module comprising electrically interconnected solar cells of the invention.
The invention further provides a method of producing a solar cell comprising the steps of providing a silicon wafer having a front side and a backside, applying the electroconductive paste of the invention to the silicon wafer (e.g., the front side of the wafer), and firing the silicon wafer.
The invention relates to glass compositions which preferably have a low content of, or are free of, lead and/or bismuth. In a preferred embodiment, the glass composition is lead-free and/or bismuth-free. While not limited to such an application, the glass compositions of the invention may be used in electroconductive paste compositions, such as those used to form electrodes on a solar cell. The electroconductive paste composition of the invention preferably comprises conductive metallic particles, an organic vehicle, and the disclosed glass compositions. The electroconductive paste composition may further comprise one or more additives.
The electroconductive paste composition may include a combination of glass compositions (preferably, lead-free and/or bismuth-free glass compositions) or compounds (e.g., organometallic compounds, salts) that form glass(es) during physical processing (e.g., mechanochemical processing, milling, or grinding) or chemical processing (e.g., firing, thermal decomposition, or photo or radiochemical decomposition). In other embodiments, the elements forming the glass composition(s) may be present in a single component or distributed among two or more components, which may be amorphous, crystalline or partially crystalline.
When applied to silicon solar cells, such pastes may be used to form an electrical contact layer or electrode, either on the front side or backside of the silicon wafer. In one preferred embodiment, the electroconductive paste is used on the front side of a silicon wafer for a solar cell and includes silver particles, the glass composition(s) of the invention, and an organic vehicle.
The glass compositions of the invention serve multiple functions when used in an electroconductive paste composition. First, the glass provides a delivery media for the conductive particles, allowing them to migrate from the paste to the interface of the semiconductor substrate. The glass also provides a reaction media for the paste components to undergo physical and chemical reactions at the interface when subjected to elevated temperatures. Physical reactions include, but are not limited to, melting, dissolving, diffusing, sintering, precipitating, and crystallizing. Chemical reactions include, but are not limited to, synthesis (forming new chemical bonds) and decomposition, reduction and oxidation, and phase transitioning. Further, the glass also acts as an adhesion media that provides bonding between the conductive particles and the semiconductor substrate, thereby improving electrical contact performance during the lifetime of the solar device. Although intended to achieve the same effects, existing glass compositions can result in high contact resistance at the interface of the electroconductive paste and the silicon wafer due to the insulative properties of the glass. The glass compositions of the invention provide the desired delivery, reactivity, and adhesion media, but also lower contact resistance and improve overall cell performance. An improved overall cell performance is also expressed by, for example, higher short circuit voltage, lower series resistance, better adhesion of the electrode to the substrate, and higher current.
Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that the glass provides improved Ohmic and Schottky contact between the conductive particles and the semiconductor substrate (e.g., silicon substrate) in the solar cell. The glass is a reactive media with respect to the silicon and creates active areas on the silicon substrate that improve overall contact, such as through direct contact or tunneling. The improved contact properties provide better Ohmic contact and Schottky contact, and therefore better overall solar cell performance. Further, the combination of the glass components, in certain amounts, provides a paste with a widened range of glass transition temperatures, softening temperatures, melting temperatures, crystallization temperatures, and flowing temperatures, thus broadening the processing window of the resulting paste. This allows the resulting electroconductive paste to have improved compatibility with a variety of substrates.
According to a preferred embodiment, the glass composition has a low lead oxide content. According to another preferred embodiment, the glass composition is lead-free. As set forth herein, the term “low lead content” refers to a composition having a lead oxide content of at least 0.5 wt % and less than about 5 wt %, such as less than about 4 wt %, less than about 3 wt %, less than about 2 wt %, less than about 1 wt %, and less than about 0.8 wt %. As set forth herein, the term “lead-free” refers to a composition having a lead oxide content of less than about 0.5 wt %, preferably less than about 0.4 wt %, more preferably less than about 0.3 wt %, more preferably less than about 0.2 wt %, and most preferably less than about 0.1 wt % lead oxide (based upon 100% total weight of the glass composition). In a most preferred embodiment, the glass composition comprises less than about 0.01 wt % lead oxide, which may be present as an incidental impurity from the other glass components. In one preferred embodiment, the glass composition does not include any intentionally added lead oxide.
According to another preferred embodiment, the glass composition has a low bismuth oxide content. According to yet another preferred embodiment, bismuth-free. As set forth herein, the term “low bismuth content” refers to a composition having a bismuth oxide content of at least 0.5 wt % and less than about 5 wt %, such as less than about 4 wt %, less than about 3 wt %, less than about 2 wt %, less than about 1 wt %, and less than about 0.8 wt %. As set forth herein, the term “bismuth-free” refers to a composition having a bismuth oxide content of less than about 0.5 wt %, preferably less than about 0.4 wt %, more preferably less than about 0.3 wt %, more preferably less than about 0.2 wt %, and most preferably less than about 0.1 wt % (based upon 100% total weight of the glass composition). In a most preferred embodiment, the glass composition comprises less than about 0.01 wt % bismuth oxide, which may be present as an incidental impurity from the other glass components. In one preferred embodiment, the glass composition does not include any intentionally added bismuth oxide.
In one embodiment, the total amount of Bi2O3 and PbO together is preferably less than 5 wt %, more preferably less than 3 wt %, more preferably less than 2.5 wt %, and most preferably less than 2.0 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the glass composition. In a most preferred embodiment, the glass composition is both lead-free and bismuth-free.
The glass composition includes tellurium oxide (TeO2), lithium oxide (Li2O), and zinc oxide (ZnO). In one embodiment, the glass composition additionally comprises sodium oxide (Na2O).
In at least one embodiment, the total amount of TeO2, Li2O, and ZnO is at least 50 wt %, preferably at least 60 wt %, and most preferably at least 70 wt %, based on 100% total weight of the glass composition. In further embodiments, the weight ratios of the components may be one or any combination of the following:
In another embodiment, the weight ratios of the components may be one or any combination of the following:
The glass composition preferably comprises about 50-99.4 wt % TeO2, more preferably about 65-97 wt %, and most preferably about 74-95 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the TeO2, ZnO, and Li2O. In a preferred embodiment, the glass composition comprises no more than about 95 wt % TeO2, preferably no more than about 93 wt % TeO2, and most preferably no more than about 90 wt % TeO2, based upon 100% total weight of the entire glass composition. In another preferred embodiment, the glass composition comprises at least 40 wt % TeO2, preferably at least about 50 wt % TeO2, and most preferably at least about 60 wt % TeO2, based upon 100% total weight of the entire glass composition.
In another embodiment, the amount of Li2O is preferably more than about 1 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of TeO2, ZnO, and Li2O. The glass composition preferably comprises about 0.1-15 wt % Li2O, more preferably about 1-10 wt % Li2O, and most preferably about 1-7 wt % Li2O, based upon 100% total weight of TeO2, ZnO, and Li2O. In a preferred embodiment, the glass composition comprises at least 1 wt % Li2O (e.g., at least about 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, and 1.9 wt %) and preferably at least 2 wt % Li2O, based upon 100% total weight of the entire glass composition. In another embodiment, the glass composition preferably comprises no more than about 15 wt % Li2O, preferably no more than about 12 wt %, and most preferably no more than about 10 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the entire glass composition.
The glass composition preferably comprises more than about 1 wt % of ZnO, based upon 100% total weight of TeO2, ZnO, and Li2O. In one embodiment, the glass composition comprises about 0.5-35 wt % ZnO, preferably about 2-25 wt % ZnO and most preferably about 4-19 wt % ZnO, based upon 100% total weight of TeO2, ZnO, and Li2O.
In another embodiment, the glass composition further comprises at least about 0.1 wt % of Na2O, based upon 100% total weight of the glass composition. In one embodiment, the glass composition comprises about 0.1-5 wt % Na2O, preferably about 0.1-4 wt % Na2O and most preferably about 0.1-3 wt % Na2O. In one embodiment, the glass composition does not include Na2O.
The glass composition may include glass material(s), ceramic material(s), and any other compound(s) known in the art to form a reactive matrix at an elevated temperature. In one embodiment, the glass composition may include at least one substantially amorphous glass frit. In another embodiment, the glass composition may incorporate crystalline phases or compounds, or a mixture of amorphous, partially crystalline, and/or crystalline materials. The glass composition may also include other oxides or compounds known in the art. For example, oxides of boron, aluminum, gallium, silicon, nickel, tungsten, gadolinium, tantalum, antimony, cerium, zirconium, titanium, manganese, tin, ruthenium, cobalt, iron, copper, and chromium, or any combination of at least two thereof, preferably antimony, manganese, nickel, tungsten, and ruthenium, or a combination of at least two thereof, compounds which can generate those metal oxides upon firing, or a mixture of at least two of the aforementioned metals, a mixture of at least two of the aforementioned oxides, a mixture of at least two of the aforementioned compounds which can generate those metal oxides on firing, or mixtures of two or more of any of the above mentioned components, may be used. Other glass matrix formers or glass modifiers, such as germanium oxide, vanadium oxide, molybdenum oxides, niobium oxides, indium oxides, phosphorus oxides, rare earth metal oxides, alkaline metal oxides, alkaline earth metal oxides, metal phosphates, and metal halides (e.g., zinc fluorides) and calcogenides may also be used as additives to adjust properties such as the glass transition temperature of the overall glass composition. In one embodiment, the glass composition may contain a combination of at least one glass and at least one oxide or additive. In one embodiment, the glass composition includes at least about 0.1 wt % of additional oxides and/or additives and no more than about 50 wt %, preferably no more than about 40 wt %, more preferably no more than about 30 wt %, and most preferably no more than about 20 wt % of such oxides and/or additives, based upon 100% total weight of the glass composition. For example, in one embodiment, the glass composition may include MgO, TiO2, SiO2, B2O3, Na2O, K2O, CaO, SrO, BaO, V2O5, MoO3, Cr2O3, WO3, MnO, Al2O3, P2O5, CdO, Ag2O, AgI, AgBr, AgCl or combinations thereof.
The glass composition may be formed by any method known in the art, including solid state synthesis, melting and quenching, or other Chimie Douce (soft chemistry) processes. In a typical melting and quenching process, the first step is to mix the appropriate amounts of the starting materials (usually in powder form). This mixture is heated in air or in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to form a melt. The melt is quenched, and then ground, ball milled, and/or screened, in order to provide a mixture with the desired particle size. For example, components in powder form may be mixed together in a V-comb blender. The mixture is heated (e.g., to around 800-1200° C.) for about 30-40 minutes such that the starting materials may react to form a one-glass system. The system is then quenched, taking on a sand-like consistency. This coarse powder is milled, such as in a ball mill or jet mill, until a fine powder results. The glass particles may be milled to an average particle size (d50) of about 0.01-20 μm, preferably about 0.1-5 μm. In one embodiment, the glass particles may be formed as nano-sized particles having a d50 ranging from about 1 to about 100 nm.
Chimie Douce (soft chemistry) processes are carried out at temperatures of about 20° C. to about 500° C. Chimie Douce reactions are topotactic, meaning that structural elements of the reactants are preserved in the product, but the composition changes. Such processes include, but are not limited to, sol-gel processes, precipitation, hydrothermal/solvothermal processes, and pyrolysis. Conventional solid state synthesis may also be used to prepare the glass composition described herein. In this process, raw starting materials are sealed in a fused quartz tube or tantalum or platinum tube under vacuum, and then heated to about 700-1200° C. The materials dwell at this elevated temperature for about 12-48 hours and then are slowly cooled (about 0.1° C./minute) to room temperature. In some cases, solid state reactions may be carried out in an alumina crucible in air. Yet another process for preparing the glass composition is co-precipitation. In this process, the metal elements are reduced and co-precipitated with other metal oxides or hydroxides to form a solution containing metal cations by adjusting the pH levels or by incorporating reducing agents. The precipitates of these metals, metal oxides or hydroxides are then dried and fired under vacuum at about 400-800° C. to form a fine powder.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the glass composition has a glass transition temperature range (Tg) below the desired firing temperature of the electroconductive paste. Preferred glass compositions have a Tg range of at least about 150° C., preferably at least 180° C., and most preferably at least 210° C. At the same time, preferred glass materials have a Tg range of no more than about 750° C., preferably no more than about 700° C., and most preferably no more than about 650° C., when measured using thermomechanical analysis. Specifically, the glass transition temperature may be determined using a DSC apparatus, such as a TA Instruments SDT Q600 Simultaneous TGA/DSC (TA Instruments). For the measurements and data evaluation, the measurement software TA Universal Analysis 2000, V 4.5A is applied. As pan for reference and sample, Alumina sample cups (commercially available from TA Instruments) with a diameter of 6.8 mm and a volume of about 90 μl are used. An amount of about 20-50 mg of the sample is weighed into the sample pan with an accuracy of 0.01 mg. The empty reference pan and the sample pan are placed in the apparatus, the oven is closed, and the measurement started. A heating rate of 10-50 ° C./min is employed from a starting temperature of 25° C. to an end temperature of 1000° C. The balance in the instrument is always purged with nitrogen (N25.0) and the oven is purged with synthetic air (80% N2 and 20% O2 from Linde) with a flow rate of 50 ml/min. The first step in the DSC signal is evaluated as glass transition using the software described above and the determined onset value is taken as the temperature for Tg.
It is well known in the art that glass particles can exhibit a variety of shapes, sizes, and coating layers. For example, a large number of shapes of glass particles are known in the art. Some examples include spherical, angular, elongated (rod or needle like), and flat (sheet like, flakes). Glass particles may also be present as a combination of particles of different shapes (e.g., spheres and flakes). Glass particles with a shape, or combination of shapes, which favor advantageous adhesion of the produced electrode are preferred.
The median particle diameter ids° is a characteristic of particles well known in the art. The d50 is the median diameter or the medium value of the particle size distribution. It is the value of the particle diameter at 50% in the cumulative distribution. Particle size distribution may be measured via laser diffraction, dynamic light scattering, imaging, electrophoretic light scattering, or any other method known in the art. A Horiba LA-910 Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer connected to a computer with the LA-910 software program is used to determine the particle size distribution of the glass frit. The relative refractive index of the glass frit particle is chosen from the LA-910 manual and entered into the software program. The test chamber is filled with deionized water to the proper fill line on the tank. The solution is then circulated by using the circulation and agitation functions in the software program. After one minute, the solution is drained. This is repeated an additional time to ensure the chamber is clean of any residual material. The chamber is then filled with deionized water for a third time and allowed to circulate and agitate for one minute. Any background particles in the solution are eliminated by using the blank function in the software. Ultrasonic agitation is then started, and the glass frit is slowly added to the solution in the test chamber until the transmittance bars are in the proper zone in the software program. Once the transmittance is at the correct level, the laser diffraction analysis is run and the particle size distribution of the glass is measured and given as d50. In a preferred embodiment, the median particle diameter d50 of the glass particles is at least about 0.1 μm, and preferably no more than about 20 μm, more preferably no more than about 10 μm, more preferably no more than about 5 μm, and most preferably no more than about 3 μm.
The specific surface area is also a characteristic of particles well known in the art. As set forth herein, all surface area measurements were performed using the BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) method via a Monosorb MS-22 analyzer (manufactured by Quantachrome Instruments of Boynton Beach, Flo.) which operates according to the SMART method. Samples are prepared for analysis in the built-in degas station. Flowing gas sweeps away impurities, resulting in a clean surface upon which adsorption may occur. The sample can be heated to a user-selectable temperature with the supplied heating mantle. Digital temperature control and display are mounted on the instrument front panel. After degassing is complete, the sample cell is transferred to the analysis station. Quick connect fittings automatically seal the sample cell during transfer. With the push of a single button, analysis commences. A dewar flask filled with coolant is automatically raised, immersing the sample cell and causing adsorption. The instrument detects when adsorption is complete (2-3 minutes), automatically lowers the dewar flask, and gently heats the sample cell back to room temperature using a built-in hot-air blower. As a result, the desorbed gas signal is displayed on a digital meter and the surface area is directly presented on a front panel display. The entire measurement (adsorption and desorption) cycle typically requires less than six minutes. The technique uses a high sensitivity, thermal conductivity detector to measure the change in concentration of an adsorbate/inert carrier gas mixture as adsorption and desorption proceed. When integrated by the on-board electronics and compared to calibration, the detector provides the volume of gas adsorbed or desorbed. A built-in microprocessor ensures linearity and automatically computes the sample's BET surface area in m2/g. In one embodiment, the glass particles have a specific surface area of at least about 0.1 m2/g and no more than about 15 m2/g, preferably at least about 1 m2/g and no more than about 10 m2/g.
One aspect of the invention relates to an electroconductive paste composition. A desired electroconductive paste is one which is highly conductive so as to optimize the resulting solar cell's electrical performance. The electroconductive paste composition is generally comprised of metallic particles, organic vehicle, and at least one of the glass compositions discussed herein. According to one embodiment, the electroconductive paste comprises: (i) at least about 50 wt % and no more than about 95 wt % metallic particles; (ii) at least about 0.1 wt % and no more than about 10 wt % glass; and (iii) at least about 1 wt % and no more than about 25 wt % organic vehicle (based upon 100% total weight of the paste).
In a preferred embodiment, the electroconductive paste composition includes at least about 0.1 wt % of the glass composition, and preferably at least about 0.5 wt %. At the same time, the paste includes no more than about 10 wt % of the glass composition, preferably no more than about 8 wt %, and most preferably no more than about 6 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the paste.
The electroconductive paste comprises conductive metallic particles. The electroconductive paste may comprise at least about 50 wt % metallic particles, preferably at least about 60 wt %, more preferably at least about 70 wt %, and most preferably at least about 80 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the paste. At the same time, the paste preferably comprises no more than about 95 wt % of metallic particles, based upon 100% total weight of the paste.
All metallic particles known in the art and which are considered suitable for use in an electroconductive paste may be employed. Preferred metallic particles are those which exhibit high conductivity and which yield electrodes having high efficiency and fill factor and low series and grid resistance. Preferred metallic particles are elemental metals, alloys, metal derivatives, mixtures of at least two metals, mixtures of at least two alloys or mixtures of at least one metal with at least one alloy. Preferred metals include at least one of silver, aluminum, gold, copper, and nickel and alloys or mixtures thereof. In a preferred embodiment, the metallic particles comprise silver. In another preferred embodiment, the metallic particles comprise silver and aluminum. Suitable silver derivatives include, for example, silver alloys and/or silver salts, such as silver halides (e.g., silver chloride), silver nitrate, silver acetate, silver trifluoroacetate, silver orthophosphate, and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the metallic particles comprise a metal or alloy coated with one or more different metals or alloys, for example, silver particles coated with aluminum or copper particles coated with silver.
Like the glass particles, the metallic particles can exhibit a variety of shapes and sizes. Metallic particles may also be present as a combination of particles of different shapes (e.g., spheres and flakes). Metallic particles with a shape, or combination of shapes, which favor improved conductivity are preferred. One way to characterize such shapes without considering the surface nature of the particles is through the following parameters: length, width and thickness. In the context of the invention, the length of a particle is given by the length of the longest spatial displacement vector, both endpoints of which are contained within the particle. The width of a particle is given by the length of the longest spatial displacement vector perpendicular to the length vector defined above both endpoints of which are contained within the particle. The thickness of a particle is given by the length of the longest spatial displacement vector perpendicular to both the length vector and the width vector, both defined above, both endpoints of which are contained within the particle. In one embodiment, metallic particles with shapes as uniform as possible are preferred (i.e. shapes in which the ratios relating the length, the width and the thickness are as close as possible to 1; preferably at least 0.7, more preferably at least 0.8, and most preferably at least 0.9, and preferably no more than about 1.5, preferably no more than about 1.3, and most preferably no more than about 1.2). Examples of preferred shapes for the metallic particles in this embodiment are spheres and cubes, or combinations thereof, or combinations of one or more thereof with other shapes. In another embodiment, metallic particles are preferred which have a shape of low uniformity, preferably with at least one of the ratios relating the dimensions of length, width and thickness being above about 1.5, more preferably above about 3 and most preferably above about 5. Preferred shapes according to this embodiment are flake shaped, rod or needle shaped, or a combination of flake shaped, rod or needle shaped with other shapes.
It is preferred that the median particle diameter d50 of the metallic particles (measured using the same method as disclosed for the glass particles) is at least about 0.1 μm, and preferably no more than about 10 μm, preferably no more than about 8 μm, more preferably no more than about 7 μm, and most preferably no more than about 5 μm. Further, metallic particles have a specific surface area (measured using the same method as disclosed for the glass particles) of at least about 0.1 m2/g and no more than about 10 m2/g. According to a preferred embodiment, silver powders having a specific surface area of at least about 0.2 m2/g, preferably at least 0.5 m2/g, and at the same time no more than about 5 m2/g are used.
Additional components which contribute to more favorable contact properties and electrical conductivity are preferred. For example, the metallic particles may be present with a surface coating. Any such coating known in the art, and which is considered to be suitable in the context of the invention, may be employed on the metallic particles. Preferred coatings are those coatings which promote the adhesion characteristics of the resulting electroconductive paste. If such a coating is present, it is preferred that the coating be no more than about 10 wt %, preferably no more than about 8 wt %, and most preferably no more than about 5 wt %, based on 100% total weight of the metallic particles.
The electroconductive paste of the invention also comprises an organic vehicle. In one embodiment, the organic vehicle is present in the electroconductive paste in an amount of at least about 0.01 wt % and no more than about 50 wt %, preferably no more than about 30 wt %, and most preferably no more than about 20 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the paste.
Preferred organic vehicles in the context of the invention are solutions, emulsions or dispersions based on one or more solvents, preferably organic solvent(s), which ensure that the components of the electroconductive paste are present in a dissolved, emulsified or dispersed form. Preferred organic vehicles are those which provide optimal stability of the components of the electroconductive paste and endow the paste with a viscosity allowing effective printability.
In one embodiment, the organic vehicle comprises an organic solvent and optionally one or more of a binder (e.g., a polymer), a surfactant and a thixotropic agent. For example, in one embodiment, the organic vehicle comprises one or more binders in an organic solvent.
Preferred binders in the context of the invention are those which contribute to the formation of an electroconductive paste with favorable stability, printability, viscosity and sintering properties. All binders which are known in the art, and which are considered to be suitable in the context of this invention, may be employed as the binder in the organic vehicle. Preferred binders (which often fall within the category termed “resins”) are polymeric binders, monomeric binders, and binders which are a combination of polymers and monomers. Polymeric binders can also be copolymers wherein at least two different monomeric units are contained in a single molecule. Preferred polymeric binders are those which carry functional groups in the polymer main chain, those which carry functional groups off of the main chain and those which carry functional groups both within the main chain and off of the main chain. Preferred polymers carrying functional groups in the main chain are for example polyesters, substituted polyesters, polycarbonates, substituted polycarbonates, polymers which carry cyclic groups in the main chain, poly-sugars, substituted poly-sugars, polyurethanes, substituted polyurethanes, polyamides, substituted polyamides, phenolic resins, substituted phenolic resins, copolymers of the monomers of one or more of the preceding polymers, optionally with other co-monomers, or a combination of at least two thereof. According to one embodiment, the binder may be polyvinyl butyral or polyethylene. Preferred polymers which carry cyclic groups in the main chain are for example polyvinylbutylate (PVB) and its derivatives and poly-terpineol and its derivatives or mixtures thereof. Preferred poly-sugars are for example cellulose and alkyl derivatives thereof, preferably methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, propyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, butyl cellulose and their derivatives and mixtures of at least two thereof. Other preferred polymers are cellulose ester resins, e.g., cellulose acetate propionate, cellulose acetate buyrate, and any combinations thereof. Preferred polymers which carry functional groups off of the main polymer chain are those which carry amide groups, those which carry acid and/or ester groups, often called acrylic resins, or polymers which carry a combination of aforementioned functional groups, or a combination thereof. Preferred polymers which carry amide off of the main chain are for example polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) and its derivatives. Preferred polymers which carry acid and/or ester groups off of the main chain are for example polyacrylic acid and its derivatives, polymethacrylate (PMA) and its derivatives or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and its derivatives, or a mixture thereof. Preferred monomeric binders are ethylene glycol based monomers, terpineol resins or rosin derivatives, or a mixture thereof. Preferred monomeric binders based on ethylene glycol are those with ether groups, ester groups or those with an ether group and an ester group, preferred ether groups being methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl, and higher alkyl ethers, the preferred ester group being acetate and its alkyl derivatives, preferably ethylene glycol monobutylether monoacetate or a mixture thereof. Alkyl cellulose, preferably ethyl cellulose, its derivatives and mixtures thereof with other binders from the preceding lists of binders or otherwise are the most preferred binders in the context of the invention. The binder may be present in an amount of at least about 0.1 wt %, and preferably at least about 0.5 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the organic vehicle. At the same time, the binder may be present in an amount of no more than about 10 wt %, preferably no more than about 8 wt %, and more preferably no more than about 7 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the organic vehicle.
Preferred solvents are components which are removed from the paste to a significant extent during firing. Preferably, they are present after firing with an absolute weight reduced by at least about 80% compared to before firing, preferably reduced by at least about 95% compared to before firing. Preferred solvents are those which contribute to favorable viscosity, printability, stability and sintering characteristics. All solvents which are known in the art, and which are considered to be suitable in the context of this invention, may be employed as the solvent in the organic vehicle. Preferred solvents are those which exist as a liquid under standard ambient temperature and pressure (SATP) (298.15 K, 25° C., 77° F.), 100 kPa (14.504 psi, 0.986 atm), preferably those with a boiling point above about 90° C. and a melting point above about −20° C. Preferred solvents are polar or non-polar, protic or aprotic, aromatic or non-aromatic. Preferred solvents are mono-alcohols, di-alcohols, poly-alcohols, mono-esters, di-esters, poly-esters, mono-ethers, di-ethers, poly-ethers, solvents which comprise at least one or more of these categories of functional group, optionally comprising other categories of functional group, preferably cyclic groups, aromatic groups, unsaturated bonds, alcohol groups with one or more O atoms replaced by heteroatoms, ether groups with one or more O atoms replaced by heteroatoms, esters groups with one or more O atoms replaced by heteroatoms, and mixtures of two or more of the aforementioned solvents. Preferred esters in this context are di-alkyl esters of adipic acid, preferred alkyl constituents being methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl and higher alkyl groups or combinations of two different such alkyl groups, preferably dimethyladipate, and mixtures of two or more adipate esters. Preferred ethers in this context are diethers, preferably dialkyl ethers of ethylene glycol, preferred alkyl constituents being methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl and higher alkyl groups or combinations of two different such alkyl groups, and mixtures of two diethers. Preferred alcohols in this context are primary, secondary and tertiary alcohols, preferably tertiary alcohols, terpineol and its derivatives being preferred, or a mixture of two or more alcohols. Preferred solvents which combine more than one different functional groups are 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate, often called texanol, and its derivatives, 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethanol, often known as carbitol, its alkyl derivatives, preferably methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, and hexyl carbitol, preferably hexyl carbitol or butyl carbitol, and acetate derivatives thereof, preferably butyl carbitol acetate, or mixtures of at least two of the aforementioned. The organic solvent may be present in an amount of at least about 60 wt %, and more preferably at least about 70 wt %, and most preferably at least about 80wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the organic vehicle. At the same time, the organic solvent may be present in an amount of no more than about 99 wt %, more preferably no more than about 95 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the organic vehicle.
The organic vehicle may also comprise one or more surfactants and/or additives. Preferred surfactants are those which contribute to the formation of an electroconductive paste with favorable stability, printability, viscosity and sintering properties. All surfactants which are known in the art, and which are considered to be suitable in the context of this invention, may be employed as the surfactant in the organic vehicle. Preferred surfactants are those based on linear chains, branched chains, aromatic chains, fluorinated chains, siloxane chains, polyether chains and combinations thereof. Preferred surfactants include, but are not limited to, single chained, double chained or poly chained polymers. Preferred surfactants may have non-ionic, anionic, cationic, amphiphilic, or zwitterionic heads. Preferred surfactants may be polymeric and monomeric or a mixture thereof. Preferred surfactants may have pigment affinic groups, preferably hydroxyfunctional carboxylic acid esters with pigment affinic groups (e.g., DISPERBYK®-108, manufactured by BYK USA, Inc.), acrylate copolymers with pigment affinic groups (e.g., DISPERBYK®-116, manufactured by BYK USA, Inc.), modified polyethers with pigment affinic groups (e.g., TEGO® DISPERS 655, manufactured by Evonik Tego Chemie GmbH), other surfactants with groups of high pigment affinity (e.g., TEGO® DISPERS 662 C, manufactured by Evonik Tego Chemie GmbH). Other preferred polymers not in the above list include, but are not limited to, polyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycol and its derivatives, and alkyl carboxylic acids and their derivatives or salts, or mixtures thereof. The preferred polyethylene glycol derivative is poly(ethyleneglycol)acetic acid. Preferred alkyl carboxylic acids are those with fully saturated and those with singly or poly unsaturated alkyl chains or mixtures thereof. Preferred carboxylic acids with saturated alkyl chains are those with alkyl chains lengths in a range from about 8 to about 20 carbon atoms, preferably C9H19COOH (capric acid), C11H23COOH (Lauric acid), C13H27COOH (myristic acid) C15 H31COOH (palmitic acid), C17H35COOH (stearic acid), or salts or mixtures thereof. Preferred carboxylic acids with unsaturated alkyl chains are C18H34O2 (oleic acid) and C18H32O2 (linoleic acid). The preferred monomeric surfactant is benzotriazole and its derivatives. If present, the surfactant may be at least about 0.01 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the organic vehicle. At the same time, the surfactant is preferably no more than about 10 wt %, preferably no more than about 8 wt %, and more preferably no more than about 6 wt %, based upon 100% total weight of the organic vehicle.
Preferred additives in the organic vehicle are those materials which are distinct from the aforementioned components and which contribute to favorable properties of the electroconductive paste, such as advantageous viscosity, printability, stability and sintering characteristics. Additives known in the art, and which are considered to be suitable in the context of the invention, may be used. Preferred additives include, but are not limited to, thixotropic agents, viscosity regulators, stabilizing agents, inorganic additives, thickeners, emulsifiers, dispersants and pH regulators. Preferred thixotropic agents include, but are not limited to, carboxylic acid derivatives, preferably fatty acid derivatives or combinations thereof. Preferred fatty acid derivatives include, but are not limited to, C9H19COOH (capric acid), C11H23COOH (Lauric acid), C13H27COOH (myristic acid) C15H31COOH (palmitic acid), C17H35COOH (stearic acid) C18H34O2 (oleic acid), C18H32O2 (linoleic acid) and combinations thereof. A preferred combination comprising fatty acids in this context is castor oil.
According to another embodiment, the electroconductive paste may include additives distinct from the conductive particles, the glass, and organic vehicle. Preferred additives contribute to increased performance of the electroconductive paste, of the electrodes produced thereof, or of the resulting solar cell. All additives known in the art, and which are considered suitable in the context of the invention, may be employed as additives in the electroconductive paste. Preferred additives include, but are not limited to, thixotropic agents, viscosity regulators, emulsifiers, stabilizing agents or pH regulators, inorganic additives, thickeners and dispersants, or a combination of at least two thereof. Inorganic additives are most preferred. Preferred inorganic additives include, but are not limited to, alkaline and alkaline earth metals, transition metals, such as nickel, zirconium, titanium, manganese, tin, ruthenium, cobalt, iron, copper and chromium tungsten, molybdenum, zinc; post-transition metals such as boron, silicon, germanium, tellurium, gadolinium, antimony, rare earth metals, such as lanthanum, cerium, oxides, mixed metal oxides, complex compounds, or amorphous or partially crystallized glasses formed from those oxides, or any combination of at least two thereof, preferably bismuth, zinc, antimony, manganese, magnesium, nickel, tungsten, alkali metals and alkaline earth metals, tellurium and ruthenium, or a combination of at least two thereof, oxides thereof, compounds which can generate those metal oxides or glasses on firing, or a mixture of at least two of the aforementioned metals, a mixture of at least two of the aforementioned oxides, a mixture of at least two of the aforementioned compounds which can generate those metal oxides, mixed metal oxides, compounds or amorphous or partially glasses on firing, or mixtures of two or more of any of the above mentioned.
In one embodiment, the electroconductive paste composition includes a discrete and distinct additive selected from the group consisting of Li3PO4, MnO, MnO2, Ag2MoO4 and combinations thereof. The terms “discrete” and “distinct” indicate that the additive is added to the paste separately from the rest of the paste components (i.e., conductive metallic particles, glass composition, organic vehicle) and is chemically separate from the paste components before firing.
If present, the electroconductive paste composition may include at least about 0.1 wt % additive, based upon 100% total weight of the paste. At the same time, the paste preferably includes no more than about 10 wt %, preferably no more than about 5 wt %, and more preferably no more than about 2 wt % additive(s), based upon 100% total weight of the paste.
To form the electroconductive paste composition, the glass composition may be combined with the conductive metallic particles and the organic vehicle using any method known in the art for preparing a paste composition. The method of preparation is not critical, as long as it results in a homogenously dispersed paste. The components can be mixed, such as with a mixer, then passed through a three roll mill, for example, to make a dispersed uniform paste.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a solar cell. In one embodiment, the solar cell is formed from a semiconductor substrate, for example a silicon wafer, and an electroconductive paste composition according to any of the embodiments described herein.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a solar cell prepared by a process comprising applying an electroconductive paste composition according to any of the embodiments described herein to a semiconductor substrate and firing the semiconductor substrate.
Preferred wafers have regions, among other regions of the solar cell, capable of absorbing light with high efficiency to yield electron-hole pairs and separating holes and electrons across a boundary with high efficiency, preferably across a p-n junction boundary. Preferred wafers are those comprising a single body made up of a front doped layer and a back doped layer.
Preferably, the wafer comprises appropriately doped tetravalent elements, binary compounds, tertiary compounds or alloys. Preferred tetravalent elements in this context are silicon, Ge or Sn, preferably silicon. Preferred binary compounds are combinations of two or more tetravalent elements, binary compounds of a group III element with a group V element, binary compounds of a group II element with a group VI element or binary compounds of a group IV element with a group VI element. Preferred combinations of tetravalent elements are combinations of two or more elements selected from silicon, germanium, tin or carbon, preferably SiC. The preferred binary compound of a group III element with a group V element is GaAs. According to a preferred embodiment, the wafer is silicon. The foregoing description, in which silicon is explicitly mentioned, also applies to other wafer compositions described herein.
The p-n junction boundary is located where the front doped layer and back doped layer of the wafer meet. In an n-type solar cell, the back doped layer is doped with an electron donating n-type dopant and the front doped layer is doped with an electron accepting or hole donating p-type dopant. In a p-type solar cell, the back doped layer is doped with p-type dopant and the front doped layer is doped with n-type dopant. According to a preferred embodiment, a wafer with a p-n junction boundary is prepared by first providing a doped silicon substrate and then applying a doped layer of the opposite type to one face of that substrate.
Doped silicon substrates are well known in the art. The doped silicon substrate can be prepared by any method known in the art and considered suitable for the invention. Preferred sources of silicon substrates are mono-crystalline silicon, multi-crystalline silicon, amorphous silicon and upgraded metallurgical silicon, most preferably mono-crystalline silicon or multi-crystalline silicon. Doping to form the doped silicon substrate can be carried out simultaneously by adding the dopant during the preparation of the silicon substrate, or it can be carried out in a subsequent step. Doping subsequent to the preparation of the silicon substrate can be carried out by gas diffusion epitaxy, for example. Doped silicon substrates are also readily commercially available. According to one embodiment, the initial doping of the silicon substrate may be carried out simultaneously to its formation by adding dopant to the silicon mix. According to another embodiment, the application of the front doped layer and the highly doped back layer, if present, may be carried out by gas-phase epitaxy. The gas phase epitaxy is preferably carried out at a temperature of at least about 500° C., preferably at least about 600° C., and most preferably at least about 650° C. At the same time, the gas phase epitaxy is preferably carried out at a temperature of no more than about 900° C., more preferably no more than about 800° C., and most preferably no more than about 750° C. The epitaxy is also preferably carried out at a pressure of at least 2 kPa, preferably at least about 10 kPa, and most preferably at least about 30 kPa. At the same time, the epitaxy is carried out at a pressure of no more than about 100 kPa, preferably no more than about 80 kPa, and most preferably no more than about 70 kPa.
It is known in the art that silicon substrates can exhibit a number of shapes, surface textures and sizes. The shape of the substrate may include cuboid, disc, wafer and irregular polyhedron, to name a few. According to a preferred embodiment, the wafer is a cuboid with two dimensions which are similar, preferably equal, and a third dimension which is significantly smaller than the other two dimensions. The third dimension may be at least 100 times smaller than the first two dimensions.
Further, a variety of surface types are known in the art. In one embodiment, silicon substrates with rough surfaces are preferred. One way to assess the roughness of the substrate is to evaluate the surface roughness parameter for a sub-surface of the substrate, which is small in comparison to the total surface area of the substrate, preferably less than about one hundredth of the total surface area, and which is essentially planar. The value of the surface roughness parameter is given by the ratio of the area of the sub-surface to the area of a theoretical surface formed by projecting that sub-surface onto the flat plane best fitted to the sub-surface by minimizing mean square displacement. A higher value of the surface roughness parameter indicates a rougher, more irregular surface and a lower value of the surface roughness parameter indicates a smoother, more even surface. The surface roughness of the silicon substrate is preferably modified so as to produce an optimum balance between numerous factors including, but not limited to, light absorption and adhesion to the surface.
The two larger dimensions of the silicon substrate can be varied to suit the application required of the resultant solar cell. It is preferred for the thickness of the silicon wafer to be at least about 0.01 mm. At the same time, the thickness is preferably no more than about 0.5 mm, more preferably no more than about 0.3 mm, and most preferably no more than about 0.2 mm. According to one embodiment, the silicon wafer may have a minimum thickness of 0.01 mm.
It is preferred that the front doped layer be thin in comparison to the back doped layer. It is also preferred that the front doped layer have a thickness of at least about 0.1 μm, and no more than about 10 μm, preferably no more than about 5 μm, and most preferably no more than about 2 μm.
A highly doped layer can be applied to the back face of the silicon substrate between the back doped layer and any further layers. Such a highly doped layer is of the same doping type as the back doped layer and such a layer is commonly denoted with a+ (n+-type layers are applied to n-type back doped layers and p+-type layers are applied to p-type back doped layers). This highly doped back layer serves to assist metallization and improve electroconductive properties. It is preferred for the highly doped back layer, if present, to have a thickness of at least about 1 μm, and no more than about 100 μm, preferably no more than about 50 μm, and most preferably no more than about 15 μm.
Preferred dopants are those which, when added to the silicon wafer, form a p-n junction boundary by introducing electrons or holes into the band structure. It is preferred that the identity and concentration of these dopants is specifically selected so as to tune the band structure profile of the p-n junction and set the light absorption and conductivity profiles as required. Preferred p-type dopants are those which add holes to the silicon wafer band structure. All dopants known in the art and which are considered suitable in the context of the invention can be employed as p-type dopants. Preferred p-type dopants include, but are not limited to, trivalent elements, particularly those of group 13 of the periodic table. Preferred group 13 elements of the periodic table include, but are not limited to, boron, aluminum, gallium, indium, thallium, or a combination of at least two thereof, wherein boron is particularly preferred.
Preferred n-type dopants are those which add electrons to the silicon wafer band structure. All dopants known in the art and which are considered to be suitable in the context of the invention can be employed as n-type dopants. Preferred n-type dopants include, but are not limited to, elements of group 15 of the periodic table. Preferred group 15 elements include, but are not limited to, nitrogen, phosphorus, arsenic, antimony, bismuth, or a combination of at least two thereof, wherein phosphorus is particularly preferred.
As described above, the various doping levels of the p-n junction can be varied so as to tune the desired properties of the resulting solar cell.
According to certain embodiments, the semiconductor substrate (i.e., silicon wafer) exhibits a sheet resistance above about 60 Ω/□, such as above about 65 Ω/□, 70 Ω/□, 90 Ω/□, 95 Ω/□, or 100 Ω/□.
One aspect of the invention is a solar cell obtainable from the methods of the invention. Preferred solar cells are those which have a high efficiency, in terms of proportion of total energy of incident light converted into electrical energy output. Solar cells which are lightweight and durable are also preferred. At a minimum, a solar cell typically includes: (i) front electrodes, (ii) a front doped layer, (iii) a p-n junction boundary, (iv) a back doped layer, and (v) soldering pads. The solar cell may also include additional layers for chemical/mechanical protection.
An antireflective layer may be applied as the outer layer before the electrode is applied to the front face of the solar cell. Preferred antireflective layers are those which decrease the proportion of incident light reflected by the front face and increase the proportion of incident light crossing the front face to be absorbed by the wafer. Antireflective layers which give rise to a favorable absorption/reflection ratio, are susceptible to etching by the electroconductive paste, are otherwise resistant to the temperatures required for firing of the electroconductive paste, and do not contribute to increased recombination of electrons and holes in the vicinity of the electrode interface are preferred. All antireflective layers known in the art and which are considered to be suitable in the context of the invention can be employed. Preferred antireflective layers include, but are not limited to, SiNx, SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2 or mixtures of at least two thereof and/or combinations of at least two layers thereof. According to a preferred embodiment, the antireflective layer is SiNx, in particular where a silicon wafer is employed.
The thickness of antireflective layers is suited to the wavelength of the appropriate light. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the antireflective layers have a thickness of at least about 20 nm, preferably at least about 40 nm, and most preferably at least about 60 nm. At the same time, the thickness is preferably no more than about 300 nm, preferably no more than about 200 nm, and most preferably no more than about 90 nm.
One or more passivation layers may be applied to the front and/or back side of the silicon wafer as an outer layer. The passivation layer(s) may be applied before the front electrode is formed, or before the antireflective layer is applied (if one is present). Preferred passivation layers are those which reduce the rate of electron/hole recombination in the vicinity of the electrode interface. Any passivation layer which is known in the art and which is considered to be suitable in the context of the invention can be employed. Preferred passivation layers include, but are not limited to, silicon nitride, silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide. According to a preferred embodiment, silicon nitride is used. It is preferred for the passivation layer to have a thickness of at least 0.1 nm, preferably at least about 10 nm, and most preferably at least about 30 nm. At the same time, the passivation layer is preferably no more than about 2 μm, more preferably no more than about 1 μm, and most preferably no more than about 200 nm.
In addition to the layers described above which directly contribute to the principle function of the solar cell, further layers may be added for mechanical and chemical protection.
The cell can be encapsulated to provide chemical protection. Encapsulations are well known in the art and any encapsulation suitable for the invention can be employed. According to a preferred embodiment, transparent polymers, often referred to as transparent thermoplastic resins, are used as the encapsulation material, if such an encapsulation is present. Preferred transparent polymers include, but are not limited to, silicon rubber and polyethylene vinyl acetate (PVA).
A transparent glass sheet may also be added to the front of the solar cell to provide mechanical protection to the front face of the cell. Transparent glass sheets are well known in the art and any suitable transparent glass sheet suitable may be employed.
A back protecting material may be added to the back face of the solar cell to provide mechanical protection. Back protecting materials are well known in the art and any suitable back protecting material may be employed. Preferred back protecting materials are those having good mechanical properties and weather resistance. The preferred back protection material is polyethylene terephthalate with a layer of polyvinyl fluoride. It is preferred for the back protecting material to be present underneath the encapsulation layer (in the event that both a back protection layer and encapsulation are present).
A frame material can be added to the outside of the solar cell to give mechanical support. Frame materials are well known in the art and any frame material considered suitable in the context of the invention may be employed. The preferred frame material is aluminum.
A solar cell may be prepared by applying an electroconductive paste composition to an antireflective coating, such as silicon nitride, silicon oxide, titanium oxide or aluminum oxide, on the front side of a semiconductor substrate, such as a silicon wafer, to form front side electrodes. The backside electroconductive paste is then applied to the backside of the solar cell to form soldering pads. The electroconductive pastes may be applied in any manner known in the art and considered suitable in the context of the invention. Examples include, but are not limited to, impregnation, dipping, pouring, dripping on, injection, spraying, knife coating, curtain coating, brushing or printing or a combination of at least two thereof. Preferred printing techniques are ink-jet printing, screen printing, tampon printing, offset printing, relief printing or stencil printing or a combination of at least two thereof. It is preferred that the electroconductive paste is applied by printing, preferably by screen printing. Specifically, the screens preferably have finger line opening with a diameter of at least about 10 μm, more preferably at least about 15 μm, more preferably at least about 20 μm, and most preferably at least about 25 μm. At the same time, the finger line opening diameters is preferably no more than about 100 μm, more preferably no more than about 80 μm, and most preferably no more than about 70 μm.
An aluminum paste is then applied to the backside of the substrate, overlapping the edges of the soldering pads formed from the backside electroconductive paste, to form the BSF. The substrate is then fired according to an appropriate profile determined by the substrate and the composition of the electroconductive paste.
Firing is necessary to sinter the printed electrodes and soldering pads so as to form solid conductive bodies. Firing is well known in the art and can be effected in any manner considered suitable in the context of the invention. It is preferred that firing be carried out above the Tg of the glass materials.
The maximum temperature set for firing is below about 900° C., preferably below about 860° C. Firing temperatures as low as about 820° C. have been employed for obtaining solar cells. The firing temperature profile is typically set so as to enable the burnout of organic binder materials from the electroconductive paste composition, as well as any other organic materials present. The firing step is typically carried out in air or in an oxygen-containing atmosphere in a belt furnace. It is preferred for firing to be carried out in a fast firing process with a total firing time in the range from about 30 seconds (s) to about 3 minutes, more preferably in the range from about 30 s to about 2 minutes, and most preferably in the range from about 40 s to about 1 minute. The time above 600° C. is most preferably in a range from about 3 to 7 s. The substrate may reach a peak temperature in the range of about 700 to 900° C. for a period of about 1 to 5 s. The firing may also be conducted at high transport rates, for example, about 100-500 cm/min, with resulting hold-up times of about 0.05 to 5 minutes. Multiple temperature zones, for example 3-12 zones, can be used to control the desired thermal profile.
Firing of electroconductive pastes on the front and back faces may be carried out simultaneously or sequentially. Simultaneous firing is appropriate if the electroconductive pastes applied to both faces have similar, preferably identical, optimum firing conditions. Where appropriate, it is preferred for firing to be carried out simultaneously. Where firing is carried out sequentially, it is preferable for the back electroconductive paste to be applied and fired first, followed by application and firing of the electroconductive paste to the front face.
To measure the performance of a solar cell, a standard electrical test is conducted. A sample solar cell having both front side and backside pastes printed thereon is characterized using a commercial IV-tester “cetisPV-CTL1” from Halm Elektronik GmbH. All parts of the measurement equipment as well as the solar cell to be tested are maintained at 25° C. during electrical measurement. This temperature is always measured simultaneously on the cell surface during the actual measurement by a temperature probe. The Xe Arc lamp simulates the sunlight with a known AM1.5 intensity of 1000 W/m2 on the cell surface. To bring the simulator to this intensity, the lamp is flashed several times within a short period of time until it reaches a stable level monitored by the “PVCTControl 4.260.0” software of the IV-tester. The Halm IV tester uses a multi-point contact method to measure current (I) and voltage (V) to determine the cell's IV-curve. To do so, the solar cell is placed between the multi-point contact probes in such a way that the probe fingers are in contact with the bus bars of the cell. The numbers of contact probe lines are adjusted to the number of bus bars on the cell surface. All electrical values are determined directly from this curve automatically by the implemented software package. As a reference standard, a calibrated solar cell from ISE Freiburg consisting of the same area dimensions, same wafer material and processed using the same front side layout is tested and the data compared to the certificated values. At least five wafers processed in the very same way are measured and the data interpreted by calculating the average of each value. The software PVCTControl 4.260.0 provides values for efficiency, fill factor, short circuit current, series resistance, and open circuit voltage.
Adhesive performance of a solar cell may be tested using a commercially available soldering table M300-0000-0901 from Somont GmbH, Germany. The sample is first secured in the table, and a solder ribbon from Bruker Spalek (ECu+62Sn-36Pb-2Ag) is coated with flux Kester 952S (from Kester) and adhered to the finger line or bus bar to be tested by applying the force of 12 heated pins which press the solder ribbon onto the finger line or bus bar. The heated pins have a set temperature of 280 ° C. and the soldering preheat plate on which the sample is placed is set to a temperature of 175 ° C. After cooling to room temperature, the samples are mounted on a GP Stable-Test Pro tester (GP Solar GmbH, Germany). The ribbon is fixed at the testing head and pulled with a speed of 100 mm/s and in a way that the ribbon part fixed to the cell surface and the ribbon part which is pulled enclose an angle of 45°. The force required to remove the bus bar/finger is measured in Newton. This process is repeated for contact at 10 equally spaced points along the finger/bus bar, including one measurement at each end. The mean is taken of the 10 results.
Specific contact resistance may be measured in an air conditioned room with a temperature of 22±1° C., with all equipment and materials equilibrated before taking the measurement. For measuring the specific contact resistance of fired silver electrodes on the front doped layer of a silicon solar cell, a “GP4-Test Pro” equipped with the “GP-4 Test 1.6.6 Pro” software package from GP Solar GmbH may be used. This device applies the 4-point measuring principle and estimates the specific contact resistance by the transfer length method (TLM). To measure the specific contact resistance, two one (1) cm wide stripes of the wafer are cut perpendicular to the printed finger lines of the wafer. The exact width of each stripe is measured by a micrometer with a precision of 0.05 mm. The width of the fired silver fingers is measured at three (3) different spots on the stripe with a digital microscope “VHX 600D” equipped with a wide-range zoom lens VH-Z100R from Keyence Corp. On each spot, the width is determined ten times by a 2-point measurement. The finger width value is the average of all 30 measurements. The finger width, the stripe width and the distance of the printed fingers to each other is used by the software package to calculate the specific contact resistance. The measuring current is set to 14 mA. A multi contact measuring head (part no. 04.01.0016) suitable to contact six (6) neighboring finger lines is installed and brought into contact with six (6) neighboring fingers. The measurement is performed on five (5) spots equally distributed on each stripe. After starting the measurement, the software determines the value of the specific contact resistance (mΩ*cm2) for each spot on the stripes. The average of all ten spots is taken as the value for specific contact resistance.
Another aspect of the invention is a solar cell module formed of the solar cells of the invention. A plurality of solar cells may be arranged spatially and electrically interconnected to form a collective arrangement called a module. Preferred modules can have a number of arrangements, preferably a rectangular arrangement known as a solar panel. A variety of ways to electrically connect solar cells, as well as a variety of ways to mechanically arrange and fix such cells to form collective arrangements, are well known in the art. Any such methods known in the art, and which are considered suitable in the context of the invention, may be employed. Preferred methods are those which result in a low mass to power output ratio, low volume to power output ration, and high durability. Aluminum is the preferred material for mechanical fixing of solar cells.
A set of three exemplary glass compositions (G1-G3) were each prepared according to the formulations set forth in Table 1 below. All amounts are provided in weight percent, based upon 100% total weight of the glass composition.
The glasses were formed using a melting and quenching process, whereby the starting materials were mixed at predetermined amounts in powder form. The mixture was then heated in air or in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to form a melt which was then quenched. The quenched glass was then ground, ball milled, and screened in order to provide a mixture with the desired particle size.
About 2.5 wt % of each of the exemplary glass compositions was then combined with about 88 wt % silver powder and about 9.5 wt % organic vehicle (based upon 100% total weight of the paste composition) to form exemplary pastes P1-P3. Once the pastes were mixed to a uniform consistency, they were screen printed onto the front side of a blank multicrystalline silicon wafer with 90 Ω/□ sheet resistance, using a screen with 360 mesh stainless steel wire, at about 16 μm wire diameter and15 μm EOM. A commercially available backside paste was used to form soldering pads, which extended across the full length of the cell and were about 4 mm wide. Next, a commercially available aluminum backside paste was printed all over the remaining areas of the rear side of the cell to form an aluminum BSF. The cell was then dried at an appropriate temperature. The silicon substrate, with the printed front side and backside paste, was then fired at a peak temperature of approximately 700-975° C.
The electroconductive performance of pastes P1-P3 is set forth in Table 2 below. The efficiency (Eta, %), fill factor (FF, %), and series resistance under three standard lighting intensities (Rs3, Ω) were all calculated according to the parameters set forth herein. The adhesive performance of paste P1 was also calculated according to the parameters set forth herein. The results of the adhesion test are set forth in Table 3 below in Newtons (N).
Another set of exemplary glass compositions (G6-G10) were each prepared according to the formulations set forth in Table 4 below. All amounts are provided in weight percent, based upon 100% total weight of the glass compostion. The glass compositions were formed by the process set forth in Example 1.
About 2.5 wt % of each of the exemplary glass compositions were then combined with about 88.5 wt % silver powder and about 9 wt % organic vehicle to form exemplary pastes P6-P10 and were mixed, printed and fired as described in Example 1.
The electroconductive and adhesive performance of pastes P6-P 10 is set forth in Tables 5 and 6 below. The efficiency (Eta, %), fill factor (FF, %), and series resistance under three standard lighting intensities (Rs3, Ω) were all calculated according to the parameters set forth herein. The adhesion data was calculated according to the same parameters set forth in Example 1.
Another set of exemplary glass compositions (G11-G16) were each prepared according to the formulations set forth in Table 7 below. All amounts are provided in weight percent, based upon 100% total weight of the glass compostion. The glass compositions were formed by the process set forth in Example 1.
About 2.5 wt % of each of the exemplary glass compositions were then combined with about 88.5 wt % silver powder and about 9 wt % organic vehicle to form exemplary pastes P11-P16 and were mixed, printed and fired as described in Example 1.
The electroconductive performance of pastes P11-P16 is set forth in Table 8 below. The efficiency (Eta, %), fill factor (FF, %), and series resistance under three standard lighting intensities (Rs3, Ω) were all calculated according to the parameters set forth herein.
A set of exemplary paste compositions (P17-P20) were prepared with about 2.5 wt % of G1 glass from Example 1, about 88.5 wt % silver powder, and about 9 wt % organic vehicle. The paste compositions were formed by the process set forth in Example 1. Each of the exemplary pastes also contained about 0.2 wt % of an additional oxide as set forth in Table 9 below.
The electroconductive performance of pastes P17-P20 is set forth in Table 10 below. The efficiency (Eta, %), fill factor (FF, %), and series resistance under three standard lighting intensities (Rs3, Ω) were all calculated according to the parameters set forth herein.
Three additional exemplary glass compositions (G21-G23) were prepared to determine the effect of varying Liz( )content on the performance of a resulting electroconductive paste. The formulations of glasses G21-G23 are set forth in Table 4 below. All amounts are provided in weight percent, based upon 100% total weight of the glass compostion. The glass compositions were formed by the process set forth in Example 1.
A set of exemplary paste compositions (P21-P23) were prepared with about 2.5 wt % each of glass G21-G23, about 88.5 wt % silver powder, and about 9 wt % organic vehicle. The paste compositions and exemplary solar cells were formed by the processes set forth in Example 1, and the solar cells were subjected to electrical performance testing according to the parameters of Example 1 as well. The results are set forth in Table 12 below.
As can be seen in Table 12, the exemplary pastes containing 2.4 and 3.5 wt % Li2O exhibited better efficiency, fill factor, and series resistance as compared to Paste P23 containing only 1.45 wt % Li2O.
These and other advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing specification. Accordingly, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that changes or modifications may be made to the above described embodiments without departing from the broad inventive concepts of the invention. Specific dimensions of any particular embodiment are described for illustration purposes only. It should therefore be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is intended to include all changes and modifications that are within the scope and spirit of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62105431 | Jan 2015 | US | |
| 62098918 | Dec 2014 | US | |
| 62098720 | Dec 2014 | US |
