This is generally related to solar roof tiles. More specifically, this is related to color management of solar roof tiles.
“Solar cell” or “cell” is a photovoltaic structure capable of converting light into electricity. A cell may have any size and any shape, and may be created from a variety of materials. For example, a solar cell may be a photovoltaic structure fabricated on a silicon wafer or one or more thin films on a substrate material (e.g., glass, plastic, or any other material capable of supporting the photovoltaic structure), or a combination thereof.
A “solar cell strip,” “photovoltaic strip,” or “strip” is a portion or segment of a photovoltaic structure, such as a solar cell. A photovoltaic structure may be divided into a number of strips. A strip may have any shape and any size. The width and length of a strip may be the same as or different from each other. Strips may be formed by further dividing a previously divided strip.
A “cascade” is a physical arrangement of solar cells or strips that are electrically coupled via electrodes on or near their edges. There are many ways to physically connect adjacent photovoltaic structures. One way is to physically overlap them at or near the edges (e.g., one edge on the positive side and another edge on the negative side) of adjacent structures. This overlapping process is sometimes referred to as “shingling.” Two or more cascading photovoltaic structures or strips can be referred to as a “cascaded string,” or more simply as a “string.”
“Finger lines,” “finger electrodes,” and “fingers” refer to elongated, electrically conductive (e.g., metallic) electrodes of a photovoltaic structure for collecting carriers.
A “busbar,” “bus line,” or “bus electrode” refers to an elongated, electrically conductive (e.g., metallic) electrode of a photovoltaic structure for aggregating current collected by two or more finger lines. A busbar is usually wider than a finger line, and can be deposited or otherwise positioned anywhere on or within the photovoltaic structure. A single photovoltaic structure may have one or more busbars.
A “photovoltaic structure” can refer to a solar cell, a segment, or solar cell strip. A photovoltaic structure is not limited to a device fabricated by a particular method. For example, a photovoltaic structure can be a crystalline silicon-based solar cell, a thin film solar cell, an amorphous silicon-based solar cell, a poly-crystalline silicon-based solar cell, or a strip thereof.
A “solar roof tile” refers to a solar module that not only is capable of generating electricity by absorbing sunlight but can also function as a conventional roof tile.
Advances in photovoltaic technology, which is used to make solar panels, have helped solar energy gain mass appeal among those wishing to reduce their carbon footprint and decrease their monthly energy costs. In the past decade, the number of residential homes equipped with solar panels has grown significantly. However, conventional rooftop solar panels often leave some portion of the roof uncovered, thus missing the opportunity to collect as much solar energy as possible. In addition, these conventional rooftop panels can be industrial-looking and often lack the curb appeal many homeowners desire.
Solar shingles or tiles, on the other hand, are solar modules that have similar appearances as conventional roof shingles or tiles. In addition to converting sunlight into electricity, the solar shingles or tiles also protect the roof from weather the same way traditional shingles or tiles do. They allow homeowners to turn their roof into an electricity generator while maintaining a conventional roofline.
A solar roof tile typically can include photovoltaic structures encapsulated between two covers. The top, sun-facing cover typically can be made of tempered glass. The transparency of the glass top cover can ensure sufficient absorption of the sunlight by the encapsulated photovoltaic structures. However, when viewed from a shallow angle (e.g., when the roof is viewed from the street), the photovoltaic structures, which can include dark colored Si substrates, can become visible. The color contrast between the photovoltaic structures and the glass cover can create a scene that is not aesthetically pleasing.
One embodiment can provide a solar roof tile. The solar roof tile can include a front cover, a back cover, one or more photovoltaic structures positioned between the front cover and the back cover, and a band-stop optical filter positioned between the front cover and the photovoltaic structures. The band-stop optical filter is configured to block light within a predetermined spectral range, thereby preventing the light from reflecting off surfaces of the photovoltaic structures to exit the solar roof tile.
In a variation of the embodiment, a peak wavelength of a reflectivity spectrum of the photovoltaic structures falls within the predetermined spectral range.
In a variation of the embodiment, the predetermined spectral range is between 350 and 450 nm.
In a variation of the embodiment, the band-stop optical filter comprises an optical absorbing layer configured to absorb light within the predetermined spectral range.
In a further variation, the optical absorbing layer can include Cu2O.
In a further variation, a thickness of the optical absorbing layer can be between 100 nm and 1000 nm.
In a further variation, the band-stop optical filter can further include a high reflection (HR) coating positioned on the optical absorbing layer, and the HR coating can be configured to have a high reflectivity within the predetermined spectral range.
In a further variation, the HR coating can include a transparent conductive oxide (TCO) layer.
In a further variation, the band-stop optical filter can further include one or more anti-reflection (AR) coatings, and the AR coatings can be configured to have a low reflectance over visible range.
In a further variation, the band-stop optical filter can include a Cu2O thin film, a first transparent conductive oxide (TCO) AR coating positioned on a first surface of the Cu2O thin film, and a second TCO AR coating on a second surface of the Cu2O thin film.
In a variation of the embodiment, the band-stop optical filter is positioned on a surface of the front cover that faces the photovoltaic structures.
In a further variation, the band-stop optical filter is deposited on the surface of the front cover using a physical vapor deposition technique.
In a variation of the embodiment, the back cover of the solar roof tile comprises polyethylene terephthalate (PET), fluoropolymer, polyvinyl fluoride (PVF), or polyamide.
In a further variation, a surface of the back cover that faces the photovoltaic structures can have a color that substantially matches that of the photovoltaic structures.
In a variation of the embodiment, the photovoltaic structures are arranged in a shingled manner to form a serially coupled string.
In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Overview
Embodiments of the invention provide a solution for the technical problem of color management of solar roof tiles. Cascaded photovoltaic strips can be sandwiched between a front glass cover and a back cover to form a solar roof tile. To obtain superior aesthetic effects, the solar roof tile can include a built-in band-stop optical filter positioned between the photovoltaic strips and the front glass cover. The optical filter can be configured to absorb/block blue or purple lights reflected from the surface of the photovoltaic structures while allowing the majority of the sunlight to pass through. The color of the back cover can also be carefully selected to match the color of light reflected from the surface of the photovoltaic structures. This way, photovoltaic structures encapsulated between the front and back covers can “blend in” with their surroundings, resulting in solar roof tiles with better aesthetics.
Solar Roof Tile with Cascaded Strips
As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/563,867, parallel connecting multiple (such as 3) strings of cascaded solar strips can provide a solar module with a reduced internal resistance. In general, a cell can be divided into a number of (e.g., n) strips, and a module can contain a number of parallel strings of cascaded strips (the number of strings can be the same as or different from the number of strips in the cell). If a string has the same number of strips as the number of undivided photovoltaic structures in a conventional single-string module, the string can output approximately the same voltage as the conventional module. Multiple strings can be connected in parallel to form a module. If the number of strings in the module is the same as the number of strips in the cell, the module can output roughly the same current as the conventional module. On the other hand, the module's total internal resistance can be a fraction (e.g., 1/n) of the resistance of a string. Therefore, in general, the greater n is, the lower the total internal resistance of the module, and the more power one can extract from the module. However, a tradeoff is that as n increases, the number of connections required to interconnect the strings also increases, which increases the amount of contact resistance. Also, the greater n is, the more strips a single cell needs to be divided into, which increases the associated production cost and decreases overall reliability due to the larger number of strips used in a single panel.
Another consideration in determining n is the contact resistance between the electrode and the photovoltaic structure on which the electrode is formed. The greater this contact resistance, the greater n might need to be to reduce effectively the panel's overall internal resistance. Hence, for a particular type of electrode, different values of n might be needed to attain sufficient benefit in reduced total panel internal resistance to offset the increased production cost and reduced reliability. For example, a conventional electrode based on silver-paste or aluminum may require n to be greater than 4, because the process of screen printing and firing silver paste onto a cell does not produce an ideal resistance between the electrode and the underlying photovoltaic structure. In some embodiments of the present invention, the electrodes, including both the busbars and finger lines, can be fabricated using a combination of physical vapor deposition (PVD) and electroplating of copper as an electrode material. The resulting copper electrode can exhibit lower resistance than an aluminum or screen-printed, silver-paste electrode. Consequently, a smaller n can be used to attain the benefit of reduced panel internal resistance. In some embodiments, n is selected to be three, which is less than the n value generally needed for cells with silver-paste electrodes or other types of electrodes. Correspondingly, two grooves can be scribed on a single cell to allow the cell to be divided into three strips.
In addition to lower contact resistance, electroplated copper electrodes can also offer better tolerance to microcracks, which may occur during a cleaving process. Such microcracks might adversely affect cells with silver-paste electrodes. Plated-copper electrodes, on the other hand, can preserve the conductivity across the cell surface even if there are microcracks in the photovoltaic structure. The copper electrode's higher tolerance for microcracks allows one to use thinner silicon wafers to manufacture cells. As a result, the grooves to be scribed on a cell can be shallower than the grooves scribed on a thicker wafer, which in turn helps increase the throughput of the scribing process. More details on using copper plating to form a low-resistance electrode on a photovoltaic structure are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/835,670, entitled “SOLAR CELL WITH METAL GRID FABRICATED BY ELECTROPLATING,” filed Jul. 13, 2010, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/220,532, entitled “SOLAR CELL WITH ELECTROPLATED GRID,” filed Aug. 29, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In the examples shown in
To form a cascaded string, cells or strips (e.g., as a result of a scribing-and-cleaving process applied to a regular square cell) can be cascaded with their edges overlapped.
Optical Filter on the Front Cover
In some embodiments, the spectral block element can include a band-stop optical filter, which can include a semiconducting material that can absorb light having wavelengths around the peak of the reflection spectrum of the photovoltaic structures. This way, light reflected from the surface of the photovoltaic structures can be absorbed by the optical filter and will not transmit outside of the solar roof tile. For example, cuprous oxide (Cu2O) has a band gap at around 2.5 eV, which means it can absorb light with a wavelength shorter than 500 nm. On the other hand,
In some embodiments, the band-stop optical filter can be implemented using an optical absorber alone. Furthermore, the absorber-based optical filter can take the form of a thin film deposited onto the front cover.
As discussed previously, front cover 502 can be made of tempered glass and backsheet 504 can be made of a wide variety of materials, including but not limited to: PET, PVF, polyamide, aluminum, etc. Note that, as seen in
Photovoltaic structures 506 can include a number of electrically coupled, either in series or in parallel, photovoltaic strips. In some embodiments, photovoltaic structures 506 can include a plurality of cascaded strips, which are arranged in a way similar to the ones shown in
The TCO layer on the front surface of the photovoltaic structure can serve both as an ohmic contact and an anti-reflection (AR) layer. Moreover, the thickness of this TCO layer can be tuned to maximize the light absorbed by the photovoltaic structure. In some embodiments, to maximize absorption of the sunlight, the TCO layer on the sun-facing side of the photovoltaic structure can have a thickness that is approximately 700 nm. This can cause the front surface of the photovoltaic structure to mostly reflect light with shorter wavelengths (e.g., blue or purple light), thus appearing to be blue or purple colored.
Encapsulant 508 can include EVA (ethyl vinyl acetate), which can be designed to be transparent (or mostly transparent) to the entire spectrum of visible light.
Optical absorbing layer 510 can include a thin film deposited onto front cover 502. In some embodiments, optical absorbing layer 510 can include a Cu2O thin film that is deposited onto front cover 502 using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique, such as evaporation or sputtering. The thickness of optical absorbing layer 510 can be between 100 nm and 1000 nm. A thicker film can increase absorption of the blue/purple light, thus facilitating better camouflaging of the photovoltaic structures. However, a thicker film may also reduce the amount of light absorbed by the photovoltaic structures, thus reducing the energy efficiency of the solar roof tile.
In addition to being able to absorb the short-wavelength light, the Cu2O layer can also strongly reflect the short-wavelength light due to its high refractive index at those wavelengths. This means that only a very small portion of the blue component of sunlight will be able to reach and be reflected by the surface of the photovoltaic structures. The combination of reflection and absorption of the short-wavelength light can ensure that the photovoltaic structures will have a similar appearance as their surroundings. More specifically, because optical absorbing layer 510 reflects the blue/purple light, the entire solar roof tile may appear blue/purple.
To further reduce the amount of short-wavelength light that may reach the surface of the photovoltaic structures and transmit outside of the solar roof tile, in some embodiments, in addition to the optical absorbing layer, the optical filter deposited onto the front cover can include one or more high-reflection (HR) layers designed to have high reflectivity for shorter-wavelength light. More specifically, the HR layers can be designed to be highly reflective of the blue or purple light or have a high refractive index at short wavelengths.
In addition to the single layer HR structure 524 shown in
In some embodiments, HR layer 524 or 554 may also be designed in such a way that the solar roof tile may have a desired appearance. For example, if HR layer 554 includes ITO, the thickness of the ITO layer may be tuned such that it reflects light of a particular color or color pattern.
The spectral block element based on both reflection and absorption mechanisms can effectively prevent light reflecting off the surface of photovoltaic structures from exiting the solar roof tile. To minimize the impact on solar cell efficiency by the spectral block element, in some embodiments, a spectral block element that is based on the absorption mechanism only can be used in solar roof tiles. More specifically, anti-reflection (AR) coatings can be applied onto the optical absorbing layer to maximize the amount of light that can be absorbed by the photovoltaic structures.
The spectral block element can take other forms. For example, the spectral block element can be arranged into a louver format to achieve the spectral-blocking effect in a particular direction.
To implement the spectral block element, in some embodiments, a directional thin film deposition technique, such as a PVD technique, can be used to coat textured back surface 704. More specifically, optical filters (e.g., optical filter 706) can be directionally deposited onto the substantially vertical surface of the 3D features, forming a louver pattern. The optical filters can be similar to optical filter 510 shown in
In some embodiments, nanoparticles that can absorb or reflect the short-wavelength light can be used to form the spectral block element.
Other than depositing nanoparticles directly onto the back surface of the front cover of the solar roof tile to obtain the spectral blocking effect, it is also possible to embed nanoparticles into a thin film and then apply such thin film onto the back surface, as shown in
Fabrication Process
Subsequent to the formation of the optical filter on the front cover, a front encapsulant layer can be placed on the optical filter (operation 806) and a string of photovoltaic strips can be placed on the front encapsulant layer (operation 808). In some embodiments, a solar roof tile may include one string that comprises six cascaded strips. More specifically, photovoltaic strips can be obtained by dividing a standard square or pseudo-square solar cell into multiple pieces; and a string of strips can be formed by cascading multiple strips at the edges. The cascading forms a serial connection among the strips. Detailed descriptions about the formation of a cascaded string of photovoltaic strips can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/826,129, entitled “PHOTOVOLTAIC STRUCTURE CLEAVING SYSTEM,” filed Aug. 13, 2015; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/866,776, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CASCADING PHOTOVOLTAIC STRUCTURES,” filed Sep. 25, 2015; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/804,306, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCRIBING PHOTOVOLTAIC STRUCTURES,” filed Jul. 20, 2015; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/866,806, entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PRECISION APPLICATION OF CONDUCTIVE ADHESIVE PASTE ON PHOTOVOLTAIC STRUCTURES,” filed Sep. 25, 2015; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/866,817, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TARGETED ANNEALING OF PHOTOVOLTAIC STRUCTURES,” filed Sep. 25, 2015; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Subsequently, a back encapsulant layer can be placed on the photovoltaic string (operation 810) and a backsheet can be applied (operation 812). A lamination process can then be performed to encapsulate the string between the front cover and the backsheet to form a roof tile (operation 814).
Alternative Embodiments
In addition to implementing the band-block optical filter as part of the front cover of the solar roof tile, in some embodiments, it is also possible to implement the band-block optical filter as part of the encapsulant or as part of the photovoltaic structures.
Optical filter 910 can be similar to optical absorbing layer 510 shown in
If band-block optical filter 910 relies on both reflection and absorption for spectral blocking (e.g., like optical filter 510 or 520), photovoltaic structures 906 will appear blue or purple to observers. Therefore, in order to “hide” the photovoltaic structures, backsheet 904 needs to have a blue or purple surface facing the photovoltaic structures. On the other hand, if band-block optical filter 910 relies on absorption only for spectral blocking (e.g., like optical filter 600), photovoltaic structures 906 will appear black to observers. To “hide” the photovoltaic structures, backsheet 904 needs to have a black surface facing the photovoltaic structures. Depending on the availability of the backsheet, one may choose different types of optical filters to integrate into the photovoltaic structures.
Optical filter film 930 can take on different forms. It can be similar to single layer structure 510 shown in
The foregoing descriptions of various embodiments have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/719,244, entitled “Glass Cover with Optical-Filtering Coating for Managing Color of a Solar Roof Tile,” filed Sep. 28, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3076861 | Samulon et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
3369939 | Myer | Feb 1968 | A |
3461602 | Hasel et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
4239810 | Alameddine et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4461922 | Gay | Jul 1984 | A |
4713493 | Ovshinsky | Dec 1987 | A |
4724011 | Turner et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
5118540 | Hutchison | Jun 1992 | A |
5149351 | Yaba et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5338369 | Rawlings | Aug 1994 | A |
5427961 | Takenouchi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5590495 | Bressler et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5667596 | Tsuzuki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5942048 | Fujisaki et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6133522 | Kataoka et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6307144 | Mimura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311436 | Mimura et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6365824 | Nakazima et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6472594 | Ichinose et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6515216 | Zenko et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6586271 | Hanoka | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6620645 | Chandra et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6960716 | Matsumi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7259321 | Oswald et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276724 | Sheats et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7506477 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7534956 | Kataoka et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7772484 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7833808 | Xu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7851700 | Luch | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7858874 | Ruskin et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7902451 | Shimizu | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7964440 | Salleo et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8205400 | Allen | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206664 | Lin | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8276329 | Lenox | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8471141 | Stancel et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8664030 | Luch | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8674377 | Farquhar | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8701360 | Ressler | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713861 | Desloover | May 2014 | B2 |
8822810 | Luch | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9038330 | Bellavia | May 2015 | B2 |
9150966 | Xu et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9206520 | Barr et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9343592 | Hunt | May 2016 | B2 |
9362527 | Takemura | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9412884 | Heng et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9525092 | Mayer et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9825582 | Fernandes et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9882077 | Morad et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9899554 | Yang et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9966487 | Magnusdottir et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10056522 | Gonzalez | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10145116 | Holt et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10381973 | Liu et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20010054435 | Nagao et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020015782 | Abys et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020182769 | Campbell | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020185171 | Huang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030180983 | Oswald et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040261840 | Schmit et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050039788 | Blieske et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050268963 | Jordan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060048798 | Mccoy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060086620 | Chase et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060204730 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070289623 | Atwater | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080135085 | Corrales et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156372 | Wu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178932 | Den et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090101192 | Kothari et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120497 | Schetty, III | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133738 | Shiao et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133739 | Shiao et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133740 | Shiao et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090165849 | Chan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090233083 | Inoue et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242021 | Petkie et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090255568 | Morgan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287446 | Wang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090308435 | Caiger | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000603 | Tsuzuki et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100006147 | Nakashima et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018568 | Nakata | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100065116 | Stancel et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100132762 | Graham et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147363 | Huang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147364 | Gonzalez et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180929 | Raymond et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100282318 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110023937 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110023942 | Soegding et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110030761 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110277825 | Fu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120000502 | Wiedeman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120012162 | Kobayashi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120031470 | Dimov et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120048349 | Metin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120060911 | Fu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120125391 | Pinarbasi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120199184 | Nie et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204939 | Lee | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237670 | Lim et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120285508 | Lee | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130048062 | Min et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130061913 | Willham et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130160823 | Khouri et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130206213 | He et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130209776 | Kim | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233378 | Moslehi et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247959 | Kwon et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255755 | Chich | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130280521 | Mori | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140120699 | Hua et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124014 | Morad et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140196768 | Heng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140313574 | Bills et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140342492 | Choi et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140360582 | Cui et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022876 | Ma et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150090314 | Yang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150155824 | Chien | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150194552 | Ogasahara et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150243931 | Fukuura | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150270410 | Heng et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150349145 | Morad et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349152 | Voss et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349703 | Morad et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160013329 | Brophy et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160020338 | Beck et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160105144 | Haynes et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160163902 | Podlowski | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160181446 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160225931 | Heng et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170033250 | Ballif et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170077343 | Morad et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170141244 | Khaled | May 2017 | A1 |
20170194516 | Reddy et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170222082 | Lin et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180115275 | Flanigan et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180123504 | Almy et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180158974 | Hiraki et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180166601 | Inaba | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190097571 | Lefevre et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20200007074 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20210044250 | Liu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102544380 | Aug 2015 | CN |
103426957 | Mar 2016 | CN |
102956730 | Jun 2016 | CN |
102007054124 | May 2009 | DE |
1058320 | Dec 2000 | EP |
2051124 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2709160 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2278618 | Dec 1994 | GB |
2431773 | May 2007 | GB |
57-141979 | Sep 1982 | JP |
60-20586 | Feb 1985 | JP |
6-140657 | May 1994 | JP |
6-264571 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2000-91610 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-216415 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2013-211385 | Oct 2013 | JP |
201039452 | Nov 2010 | TW |
2008136872 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009062106 | May 2009 | WO |
2009099418 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010128375 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011128757 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2013059441 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013067541 | May 2013 | WO |
2013102181 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2014178180 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015155356 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2016090341 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2018158470 | Sep 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/598,194, dated Jun. 22, 2018, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/025,834, dated Apr. 10, 2020, 11 pages. |
First Action Interview Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/598,194, dated Feb. 12, 2018, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030492, dated Nov. 28, 2019, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030492, dated Jul. 20, 2018, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/044790, dated Feb. 3, 2021, 19 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/044790, dated Nov. 5, 2020, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/025,834, dated Dec. 24, 2020, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/025,834, dated Sep. 6, 2019, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/533,524, dated Sep. 3, 2020, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/598,194, dated Apr. 3, 2019, 11 pages. |
Pre-Interview First Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/598,194, dated Dec. 21, 2017, 5 pages. |
Lin et al., “Fabrication of Antireflective Nanostructures for Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells by Reactive Ion Etching”, Thin Solid Films 529, 2013, pp. 138-142. |
Advisory Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/719,244, dated Aug. 12, 2020, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/719,244, dated Feb. 19, 2020, 22 pages. |
First Action Interview—Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/719,244, dated Aug. 20, 2019, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/719,244, dated Dec. 11, 2020, 11 pages. |
Pre-Interview First Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/719,244, dated Jun. 13, 2019, 5 pages. |
Balucani et al., “A New Approach: Low Cost Masking Material and Efficient Copper Metallization for Higher Efficiency Silicon Solar Cells”, IEEE, 2015, 6 pages. |
Fan et al., “Laser micromachined Wax-Covered Plastic Paper as both Sputter Deposition Shadow Masks and Deep-Ultraviolet Patterning Masks for Polymethylmacrylate-Based Microfluidic Systems”, vol. 12, No. 4, Journal of Micro/ Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, Oct. 2013, pp. 1-6. |
Pelisset et al., “Efficiency of Silicon Thin-Film Photovoltaic Modules with a Front Coloured Glass”, Proceeding of the CISBAT International Conference, 2011, 6 pages. |
Poole et al., “Recovery Act: Organic Coatings as Encapsulants for Low Cost, High Performance PV Modules”, Final Technical Report, PPG Industries Inc., Nov. 16, 2011, 35 pages. |
Vyas et al., “An Inorganic/Organic Hybrid Coating for Low Cost Metal Mounted Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells”, 223rd ECS Meeting, The Electrochemical Society, 2013, 1 page. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/025,834, dated May 7, 2021, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/533,524, dated Apr. 15, 2021, 14 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/044790, dated Feb. 17, 2022, 13 pages. |
Office Action received for European Patent Application No. 18730466.2, dated Mar. 2, 2022, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/533,524, dated Nov. 5, 2021, 10 pages. |
Office Action received for Indian Patent Application No. 201947046252, dated Oct. 7, 2021, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210203272 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15719244 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | 17199303 | US |