The invention relates to acoustical tiles particularly suited for use in suspended ceilings.
Mineral fiber based ceiling tiles have long been available. Such tiles or panels are conventionally made by water felting dilute aqueous dispersions of mineral wool. In this process, an aqueous slurry of mineral wool, binder and minor quantities of other ingredients, as desired or necessary, is flowed onto a moving foraminous support wire, such as that of a Fourdrinier or Oliver mat forming machine, for dewatering. The slurry may be first dewatered by gravity, and then dewatered by vacuum suction to form a basemat; the wet basemat is then pressed to the desired thickness between rolls or an overhead travelling wire and the support wire to remove additional water. The pressed basemat is then dried in heated drying ovens, and the dried material is cut to the desired dimensions and optionally sanded and/or top coated, or covered with an adhesively attached fiberglass scrim and ultimately painted to produce finished acoustical ceiling tiles or panels.
While water felted mineral wool based acoustical ceiling tiles are relatively economical to produce because of low raw material costs, they exhibit relatively low NRC (noise reduction coefficient) values of about 0.55. It has long been desirable to produce mineral fiber-based acoustical ceiling tiles with improved NRC values.
The invention provides a mineral wool based water felted acoustical ceiling tile construction that achieves improved NRC values and that can be produced in existing facilities and with conventional processing.
The invention resides in the discovery that ordinary wet used chop strand, WUCS, fiberglass, preferably of certain characteristics, can be substituted in small fractional quantities for mineral fiber in a typical product formulation. The result of the substitution is a surprising increase in loft in the basemat. This loft represents a significant decrease in density and a corresponding increase in porosity and, consequently, sound absorption.
The invention enables the production of relatively low density, relatively thick acoustical panels capable of achieving NRC values substantially greater than 0.55 and up to 0.95 or higher, putting the performance of these tiles at the high end of the spectrum of acoustical tiles.
The body of the inventive panel is characterized by the presence of voids, which are large compared to average interstitial spaces between the composite fibers, distributed randomly throughout the panel body. The voids, by some mechanism not fully understood, are created by the presence of the glass fibers. The population of the voids appears to be proportional to the quantity of glass fibers in the basemat formulation. Fiber length and fiber diameter appear to be additional factors in the successful creation of the voids.
An acoustical tile or panel basemat according to the invention is produced by thoroughly mixing its constituents in a dilute water slurry. The slurry, in a generally conventional process, is distributed over a travelling screen or support wire to form a basemat layer. The layer is drained of water through the screen and by application of a suction vacuum. The mat is then lightly pressed between an overlying roll or travelling screen and the transport screen. Thereafter, the pressed basemat is dried in an oven and cut to a finished rectangular size. The face of the basemat may be finished with conventional techniques such as grinding, laminating and/or painting.
The invention departs from traditional mineral fiber based basemat formulations by substituting chopped strand fiberglass for a fraction of a standard amount of mineral wool fiber. The chopped strand fiberglass can be, for example, of the commercially available wet use chopped strand (WUCS) material.
Below is a formulation for a mineral fiber based basemat for an acoustical tile embodying the present invention.
The percentages shown in Tables 1 and 2 are weight percent.
A comparison of
The reason that chopped strand fibers produce, or are at least associated with the occurrence of voids throughout the body of a mineral fiber based basemat is not completely understood. The individual glass fibers appear at least in some instances to hold surrounding mineral fibers out of the space of a void like the bows of an umbrella to draw an analogy. Regardless of how the chopped strand glass fibers create and/or maintain the voids, the chopped strand glass fibers, in proportion to their mass, decrease bulk density and increase NRC.
During formation of a glass fiber chopped strand containing basemat, increased loft of the wet basemat is experienced before and after it is lightly pressed by a top screen belt or roller before it is carried to a drying oven. The chopped strand fiber preferably can be between nominally ¼ and ½ inch in length and preferably have a diameter between about 13.5 microns to 16.5 microns. The finished panels made in accordance with the invention can have a density of between 7½ to 10½ lbs. per cubic foot and a mat thickness of, for example, 1 inch to 1½ inches.
A basemat typically will have its face or room side covered by a non-woven fiberglass scrim, known in the art, that is adhesively attached and when painted or coated remains air permeable.
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3239973 | Hahn et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
4040213 | Capaul | Aug 1977 | A |
4097209 | Garrick et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4129637 | Kennedy | Dec 1978 | A |
4146564 | Garrick et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4226674 | Gross et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4847140 | Jaskowski | Jul 1989 | A |
5055341 | Yamaji et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5071511 | Pittman | Dec 1991 | A |
5148645 | Lehnert et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5968629 | Masui et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6284351 | Sensenig | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6443256 | Baig | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6616804 | Foster et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6743830 | Soane et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6877585 | Tinianov | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6929091 | Bertagni et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7294218 | Haque et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7547375 | Jaffee et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7842629 | Jaffee | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8062565 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20020029929 | Tinianov | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020096278 | Foster et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128352 | Soane et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139611 | Baig | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030041987 | Foster et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060113 | Christie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040050619 | Bargo, II | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040129492 | Bertagni et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050008845 | Hatanaka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050266757 | Roekens et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070027283 | Swift et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045892 | Sucech et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060005 | Yang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080003431 | Fellinger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080156581 | Englert et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090252941 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253323 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100101891 | Kamikawa | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100320029 | Cao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110021101 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120024625 | Cao et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120161058 | Albarran | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130023174 | Quinn | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140014437 | Wilson | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2096943 | Oct 1982 | GB |