Glaucoma stent and methods thereof for glaucoma treatment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11559430
  • Patent Number
    11,559,430
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 17, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 24, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
The invention relates generally to medical devices and methods for reducing the intraocular pressure in an animal eye and, more particularly, to stent type devices for permitting aqueous outflow from the eye's anterior chamber and associated methods thereof for the treatment of glaucoma. Some aspects provide a self-trephining glaucoma stent and methods thereof which advantageously allow for a “one-step” procedure in which the incision and placement of the stent are accomplished by a single device and operation. This desirably allows for a faster, safer, and less expensive surgical procedure.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention

The invention relates generally to medical devices and methods for reducing the intraocular pressure in an animal eye and, more particularly, to shunt type devices for permitting aqueous outflow from the eye's anterior chamber and associated methods thereof for the treatment of glaucoma.


Description of the Related Art

The human eye is a specialized sensory organ capable of light reception and able to receive visual images. The trabecular meshwork serves as a drainage channel and is located in anterior chamber angle formed between the iris and the cornea. The trabecular meshwork maintains a balanced pressure in the anterior chamber of the eye by draining aqueous humor from the anterior chamber.


About two percent of people in the United States have glaucoma. Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases encompassing a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, etiologies, and treatment modalities. Glaucoma causes pathological changes in the optic nerve, visible on the optic disk, and it causes corresponding visual field loss, resulting in blindness if untreated. Lowering intraocular pressure is the major treatment goal in all glaucomas.


In glaucomas associated with an elevation in eye pressure (intraocular hypertension), the source of resistance to outflow is mainly in the trabecular meshwork. The tissue of the trabecular meshwork allows the aqueous humor (“aqueous”) to enter Schlemm's canal, which then empties into aqueous collector channels in the posterior wall of Schlemm's canal and then into aqueous veins, which form the episcleral venous system. Aqueous humor is a transparent liquid that fills the region between the cornea, at the front of the eye, and the lens. The aqueous humor is continuously secreted by the ciliary body around the lens, so there is a constant flow of aqueous humor from the ciliary body to the eye's front chamber. The eye's pressure is determined by a balance between the production of aqueous and its exit through the trabecular meshwork (major route) or uveal scleral outflow (minor route). The trabecular meshwork is located between the outer rim of the iris and the back of the cornea, in the anterior chamber angle. The portion of the trabecular meshwork adjacent to Schlemm's canal (the juxtacanilicular meshwork) causes most of the resistance to aqueous outflow.


Glaucoma is grossly classified into two categories: closed-angle glaucoma, also known as angle closure glaucoma, and open-angle glaucoma. Closed-angle glaucoma is caused by closure of the anterior chamber angle by contact between the iris and the inner surface of the trabecular meshwork. Closure of this anatomical angle prevents normal drainage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye.


Open-angle glaucoma is any glaucoma in which the angle of the anterior chamber remains open, but the exit of aqueous through the trabecular meshwork is diminished. The exact cause for diminished filtration is unknown for most cases of open-angle glaucoma. Primary open-angle glaucoma is the most common of the glaucomas, and it is often asymptomatic in the early to moderately advanced stage. Patients may suffer substantial, irreversible vision loss prior to diagnosis and treatment. However, there are secondary open-angle glaucomas which may include edema or swelling of the trabecular spaces (e.g., from corticosteroid use), abnormal pigment dispersion, or diseases such as hyperthyroidism that produce vascular congestion.


Current therapies for glaucoma are directed at decreasing intraocular pressure. Medical therapy includes topical ophthalmic drops or oral medications that reduce the production or increase the outflow of aqueous. However, these drug therapies for glaucoma are sometimes associated with significant side effects, such as headache, blurred vision, allergic reactions, death from cardiopulmonary complications, and potential interactions with other drugs. When drug therapy fails, surgical therapy is used. Surgical therapy for open-angle glaucoma consists of laser trabeculoplasty, trabeculectomy, and implantation of aqueous shunts after failure of trabeculectomy or if trabeculectomy is unlikely to succeed. Trabeculectomy is a major surgery that is widely used and is augmented with topically applied anticancer drugs, such as 5-flurouracil or mitomycin-C to decrease scarring and increase the likelihood of surgical success.


Approximately 100,000 trabeculectomies are performed on Medicare-age patients per year in the United States. This number would likely increase if the morbidity associated with trabeculectomy could be decreased. The current morbidity associated with trabeculectomy consists of failure (10-15%); infection (a lifelong risk of 2-5%); choroidal hemorrhage, a severe internal hemorrhage from low intraocular pressure, resulting in visual loss (1%); cataract formation; and hypotony maculopathy (potentially reversible visual loss from low intraocular pressure).


For these reasons, surgeons have tried for decades to develop a workable surgery for the trabecular meshwork.


The surgical techniques that have been tried and practiced are goniotomy/trabeculotomy and other mechanical disruptions of the trabecular meshwork, such as trabeculopuncture, goniophotoablation, laser trabecular ablation, and goniocurretage. These are all major operations and are briefly described below.


Goniotomy/Trabeculotomy: Goniotomy and trabeculotomy are simple and directed techniques of microsurgical dissection with mechanical disruption of the trabecular meshwork. These initially had early favorable responses in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. However, long-term review of surgical results showed only limited success in adults. In retrospect, these procedures probably failed due to cellular repair and fibrosis mechanisms and a process of “filling in.” Filling in is a detrimental effect of collapsing and closing in of the created opening in the trabecular meshwork. Once the created openings close, the pressure builds back up and the surgery fails.


Trabeculopuncture: Q-switched Neodynium (Nd) YAG lasers also have been investigated as an optically invasive technique for creating full-thickness holes in trabecular meshwork. However, the relatively small hole created by this trabeculopuncture technique exhibits a filling-in effect and fails.


Goniophotoablation/Laser Trabecular Ablation: Goniophotoablation is disclosed by Berlin in U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,172 and involves the use of an excimer laser to treat glaucoma by ablating the trabecular meshwork. This was demonstrated not to succeed by clinical trial. Hill et al. used an Erbium:YAG laser to create full-thickness holes through trabecular meshwork (Hill et al., Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 11:341-346, 1991). This technique was investigated in a primate model and a limited human clinical trial at the University of California, Irvine. Although morbidity was zero in both trials, success rates did not warrant further human trials. Failure was again from filling in of surgically created defects in the trabecular meshwork by repair mechanisms. Neither of these is a viable surgical technique for the treatment of glaucoma.


Goniocurretage: This is an ab interno (from the inside), mechanically disruptive technique that uses an instrument similar to a cyclodialysis spatula with a microcurrette at the tip. Initial results were similar to trabeculotomy: it failed due to repair mechanisms and a process of filling in.


Although trabeculectomy is the most commonly performed filtering surgery, viscocanulostomy (VC) and non penetrating trabeculectomy (NPT) are two new variations of filtering surgery. These are ab externo (from the outside), major ocular procedures in which Schlemm's canal is surgically exposed by making a large and very deep scleral flap. In the VC procedure, Schlemm's canal is cannulated and viscoelastic substance injected (which dilates Schlemm's canal and the aqueous collector channels). In the NPT procedure, the inner wall of Schlemm's canal is stripped off after surgically exposing the canal.


Trabeculectomy, VC, and NPT involve the formation of an opening or hole under the conjunctiva and scleral flap into the anterior chamber, such that aqueous humor is drained onto the surface of the eye or into the tissues located within the lateral wall of the eye. These surgical operations are major procedures with significant ocular morbidity. When trabeculectomy, VC, and NPT are thought to have a low chance for success, a number of implantable drainage devices have been used to ensure that the desired filtration and outflow of aqueous humor through the surgical opening will continue. The risk of placing a glaucoma drainage device also includes hemorrhage, infection, and diplopia (double vision).


Examples of implantable shunts and surgical methods for maintaining an opening for the release of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye to the sclera or space beneath the conjunctiva have been disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,059,772 to Hsia et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,050,970 to Baerveldt.


All of the above surgeries and variations thereof have numerous disadvantages and moderate success rates. They involve substantial trauma to the eye and require great surgical skill in creating a hole through the full thickness of the sclera into the subconjunctival space. The procedures are generally performed in an operating room and have a prolonged recovery time for vision.


The complications of existing filtration surgery have prompted ophthalmic surgeons to find other approaches to lowering intraocular pressure.


The trabecular meshwork and juxtacanilicular tissue together provide the majority of resistance to the outflow of aqueous and, as such, are logical targets for surgical removal in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. In addition, minimal amounts of tissue are altered and existing physiologic outflow pathways are utilized.


As reported in Arch. Ophthalm. (2000) 118:412, glaucoma remains a leading cause of blindness, and filtration surgery remains an effective, important option in controlling the disease. However, modifying existing filtering surgery techniques in any profound way to increase their effectiveness appears to have reached a dead end. The article further states that the time has come to search for new surgical approaches that may provide better and safer care for patients with glaucoma.


Therefore, there is a great clinical need for a method of treating glaucoma that is faster, safer, and less expensive than currently available modalities.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The trabecular meshwork and juxtacanilicular tissue together provide the majority of resistance to the outflow of aqueous and, as such, are logical targets for surgical approach in the treatment of glaucoma. Various embodiments of glaucoma shunts are disclosed herein for aqueous to exit through the trabecular meshwork (major route) or uveal scleral outflow (minor route) or other route effective to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP).


Glaucoma surgical morbidity would greatly decrease if one were to bypass the focal resistance to outflow of aqueous only at the point of resistance, and to utilize remaining, healthy aqueous outflow mechanisms. This is in part because episcleral aqueous humor exerts a backpressure that prevents intraocular pressure from going too low, and one could thereby avoid hypotony. Thus, such a surgery would virtually eliminate the risk of hypotony-related maculopathy and choroidal hemorrhage. Furthermore, visual recovery would be very rapid, and the risk of infection would be very small, reflecting a reduction in incidence from 2-5% to about 0.05%.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,239, filed Apr. 14, 2000, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TREATING GLAUCOMA, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,736,791, filed Nov. 1, 2000, entitled GLAUCOMA TREATMENT DEVICE, disclose devices and methods of placing a trabecular shunt ab interno, i.e., from inside the anterior chamber through the trabecular meshwork, into Schlemm's canal. The entire contents of each one of these copending patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein. The invention encompasses both ab interno and ab externo glaucoma shunts or stents and methods thereof.


Techniques performed in accordance with aspects herein may be referred to generally as “trabecular bypass surgery.” Advantages of this type of surgery include lowering intraocular pressure in a manner which is simple, effective, disease site-specific, and can potentially be performed on an outpatient basis.


Generally, trabecular bypass surgery (TBS) creates an opening, a slit, or a hole through trabecular meshwork with minor microsurgery. TBS has the advantage of a much lower risk of choroidal hemorrhage and infection than prior techniques, and it uses existing physiologic outflow mechanisms. In some aspects, this surgery can potentially be performed under topical or local anesthesia on an outpatient basis with rapid visual recovery. To prevent “filling in” of the hole, a biocompatible elongated device is placed within the hole and serves as a stent. U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,239, filed Apr. 14, 2000, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein, discloses trabecular bypass surgery.


As described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,239, filed Apr. 14, 2000, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,736,791, filed Nov. 1, 2000, the entire contents each one of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein, a trabecular shunt or stent for transporting aqueous humor is provided. The trabecular stent includes a hollow, elongate tubular element, having an inlet section and an outlet section. The outlet section may optionally include two segments or elements, adapted to be positioned and stabilized inside Schlemm's canal. In one embodiment, the device appears as a “T” shaped device.


In one aspect of the invention, a delivery apparatus (or “applicator”) is used for placing a trabecular stent through a trabecular meshwork of an eye. Certain embodiments of such a delivery apparatus are disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/101,548, filed Mar. 18, 2002, entitled APPLICATOR AND METHODS FOR PLACING A TRABECULAR SHUNT FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/276,609, filed Mar. 16, 2001, entitled APPLICATOR AND METHODS FOR PLACING A TRABECULAR SHUNT FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT, the entire contents of each one of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.


The stent has an inlet section and an outlet section. The delivery apparatus includes a handpiece, an elongate tip, a holder and an actuator. The handpiece has a distal end and a proximal end. The elongate tip is connected to the distal end of the handpiece. The elongate tip has a distal portion and is configured to be placed through a corneal incision and into an anterior chamber of the eye. The holder is attached to the distal portion of the elongate tip. The holder is configured to hold and release the inlet section of the trabecular stent. The actuator is on the handpiece and actuates the holder to release the inlet section of the trabecular stent from the holder. When the trabecular stent is deployed from the delivery apparatus into the eye, the outlet section is positioned in substantially opposite directions inside Schlemm's canal. In one embodiment, a deployment mechanism within the delivery apparatus includes a push-pull type plunger.


Some aspects of the invention relate to devices for reducing intraocular pressure by providing outflow of aqueous from an anterior chamber of an eye. The device generally comprises an elongated tubular member and cutting means. The tubular member is adapted for extending through a trabecular meshwork of the eye. The tubular member generally comprises a lumen having an inlet port and an outlet port for providing a flow pathway. The cutting means is mechanically connected to the tubular member for creating an incision in the trabecular meshwork for receiving at least a portion of the tubular member.


In one aspect, a self-trephining glaucoma stent is provided for reducing and/or balancing intraocular pressure in an eye. The stent generally comprises a snorkel and a curved blade. The snorkel generally comprises an upper seat for stabilizing said stent within the eye, a shank and a lumen. The shank is mechanically connected to the seat and is adapted for extending through a trabecular meshwork of the eye. The lumen extends through the snorkel and has at least one inlet flow port and at least one outlet flow port. The blade is mechanically connected to the snorkel. The blade generally comprises a cutting tip proximate a distal-most point of the blade for making an incision in the trabecular meshwork for receiving the shank.


Some aspects of the invention relate to methods of implanting a trabecular stent device in an eye. In one aspect, the device has a snorkel mechanically connected to a blade. The blade is advanced blade through a trabecular meshwork of the eye to cut the trabecular meshwork and form an incision therein. At least a portion of the snorkel is inserted in the incision to implant the device in the eye.


Some aspects provide a self-trephining glaucoma stent and methods thereof which advantageously allow for a “one-step” procedure in which the incision and placement of the stent are accomplished by a single device and operation. This desirably allows for a faster, safer, and less expensive surgical procedure. In any of the embodiments, fiducial markings, indicia, or the like and/or positioning of the stent device in a preloaded applicator may be used for proper orientation and alignment of the device during implantation.


Among the advantages of trabecular bypass surgery is its simplicity. The microsurgery may potentially be performed on an outpatient basis with rapid visual recovery and greatly decreased morbidity. There is a lower risk of infection and choroidal hemorrhage, and there is a faster recovery, than with previous techniques.


For purposes of summarizing the invention, certain aspects, advantages and novel features of the invention have been described herein above. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught or suggested herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.


All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other embodiments of the invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment(s) disclosed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Having thus summarized the general nature of the invention and some of its features and advantages, certain preferred embodiments and modifications thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description herein having reference to the figures that follow, of which:



FIG. 1 is a coronal cross-sectional view of an eye;



FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of an anterior chamber angle of the eye of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 4 is a side elevation view of the stent of FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 is a top plan view of the stent of FIG. 3;



FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view of the stent of FIG. 3;



FIG. 7 is a front end view of the stent of FIG. 3 (along line 7-7 of FIG. 4);



FIG. 8 is a rear end view of the stent of FIG. 3 (along line 8-8 of FIG. 4);



FIG. 9 is an enlarged top plan view of a cutting tip of the stent of FIG. 3;



FIG. 10 is a top plan view of one exemplary embodiment of a snorkel top seating surface;



FIG. 11 is a top plan view of another exemplary embodiment of a snorkel top seating surface;



FIG. 12 is a top plan view of yet another exemplary embodiment of a snorkel top seating surface;



FIG. 13 is a top plan view of still another exemplary embodiment of a snorkel top seating surface;



FIG. 14 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with another embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 15 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with a further embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 16 is a side elevation view of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 17 is a top plan view of the stent of FIG. 16;



FIG. 18 is a bottom plan view of the stent of FIG. 16;



FIG. 19 is a front end view along line 19-19 of FIG. 16;



FIG. 20 is a rear end view along line 20-20 of FIG. 16;



FIG. 21 is a side elevation view of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 22 is a top plan view of the stent of FIG. 21;



FIG. 23 is a bottom plan view of the stent of FIG. 21;



FIG. 24 is a front end view along line 24-24 of FIG. 21;



FIG. 25 is a rear end view along line 25-25 of FIG. 21;



FIG. 26 is a front elevation view of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 27 is a side elevation view along line 27-27 of FIG. 26;



FIG. 28 is a rear end view along line 28-28 of FIG. 26;



FIG. 29 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the temporal implantation of a glaucoma stent using a delivery apparatus having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 30 is an oblique elevational view of an articulating arm stent delivery/retrieval apparatus having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 31 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent using a delivery apparatus crossing through the eye anterior chamber;



FIG. 32 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 33 is a detailed enlarged view of the barbed pin of FIG. 32;



FIG. 34 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 35 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 36A is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 36B is a side elevation view of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 36C is a perspective view of the stent of FIG. 36B;



FIG. 36D is a side elevation view of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 36E is a perspective view of the stent of FIG. 36D;



FIG. 36F is a another perspective view of the stent of FIG. 36D;



FIG. 36G is a side elevation view of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 36H is a perspective view of the stent of FIG. 36G;



FIG. 36I is a another perspective view of the stent of FIG. 36G;



FIG. 36J is a side elevation view of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 36K is a perspective view of the stent of FIG. 36J;



FIG. 37 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 38 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 39 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 40 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 41 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 42 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 43 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a valved tube stent device having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 44 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of an osmotic membrane device having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 45 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent using ab externo procedure having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 46 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a glaucoma stent having features and advantages in accordance with a modified embodiment of the invention; and



FIG. 47 is a simplified partial view of an eye illustrating the implantation of a drug release implant having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 48 is an oblique elevational view of a trabecular shunt applicator with a retractable blade mechanism.



FIGS. 49A and 49B are schematic cross sections of a trabecular punch device.



FIGS. 50A and 50B are elevational views of a control arm and trabeculotomy device for the trabecular shunt applicator.



FIGS. 51A through 51C are schematic oblique elevational views of various trabecular meshwork punching and drilling devices.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The preferred embodiments of the invention described herein relate particularly to surgical and therapeutic treatment of glaucoma through reduction of intraocular pressure. While the description sets forth various embodiment specific details, it will be appreciated that the description is illustrative only and should not be construed in any way as limiting the invention. Furthermore, various applications of the invention, and modifications thereto, which may occur to those who are skilled in the art, are also encompassed by the general concepts described herein.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of an eye 10, while FIG. 2 is a close-up view showing the relative anatomical locations of a trabecular meshwork 21, an anterior chamber 20, and a Schlemm's canal 22. A sclera 11 is a thick collagenous tissue which covers the entire eye 10 except a portion which is covered by a cornea 12.


Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the cornea 12 is a thin transparent tissue that focuses and transmits light into the eye and through a pupil 14, which is a circular hole in the center of an iris 13 (colored portion of the eye). The cornea 12 merges into the sclera 11 at a juncture referred to as a limbus 15. A ciliary body 16 extends along the interior of the sclera 11 and is coextensive with a choroid 17. The choroid 17 is a vascular layer of the eye 10, located between the sclera 11 and a retina 18. An optic nerve 19 transmits visual information to the brain and is the anatomic structure that is progressively destroyed by glaucoma.


Still referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the anterior chamber 20 of the eye 10, which is bound anteriorly by the cornea 12 and posteriorly by the iris 13 and a lens 26, is filled with aqueous humor (hereinafter referred to as “aqueous”). Aqueous is produced primarily by the ciliary body 16, then moves anteriorly through the pupil 14 and reaches an anterior chamber angle 25, formed between the iris 13 and the cornea 12.


As best illustrated by the drawing of FIG. 2, in a normal eye, aqueous is removed from the anterior chamber 20 through the trabecular meshwork 21. Aqueous passes through the trabecular meshwork 21 into Schlemm's canal 22 and thereafter through a plurality of aqueous veins 23, which merge with blood-carrying veins, and into systemic venous circulation. Intraocular pressure is maintained by an intricate balance between secretion and outflow of aqueous in the manner described above. Glaucoma is, in most cases, characterized by an excessive buildup of aqueous in the anterior chamber 20 which leads to an increase in intraocular pressure. Fluids are relatively incompressible, and thus intraocular pressure is distributed relatively uniformly throughout the eye 10.


As shown in FIG. 2, the trabecular meshwork 21 is adjacent a small portion of the sclera 11. Exterior to the sclera 11 is a conjunctiva 24. Traditional procedures that create a hole or opening for implanting a device through the tissues of the conjunctiva 24 and sclera 11 involve extensive surgery, as compared to surgery for implanting a device, as described herein, which ultimately resides entirely within the confines of the sclera 11 and cornea 12.


Self-Trephining Glaucoma Stent



FIG. 3 generally illustrates the use of one embodiment of a trabecular stenting device 30 for establishing an outflow pathway, passing through the trabecular meshwork 21, which is discussed in greater detail below. FIGS. 4-9 are different views of the stent 30. Advantageously, and as discussed in further detail later herein, the self-trephining-stent allows a one-step procedure to make an incision in the trabecular mesh 21 and place the stent or implant 30 at the desired or predetermined position within the eye 10. Desirably, this facilitates the overall surgical procedure.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the shunt or stent 30 generally comprises a snorkel 32 and a main body portion or blade 34. The snorkel 32 and blade 34 are mechanically connected to or in mechanical communication with one another. The stent 30 and/or the body portion 34 have a generally longitudinal axis 36.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the stent 30 comprises an integral unit. In modified embodiments, the stent 30 may comprise an assembly of individual pieces or components. For example, the stent 30 may comprise an assembly of the snorkel 32 and blade 34.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the snorkel 32 is in the form of a generally elongate tubular member and generally comprises an upper seat, head or cap portion 38, a shank portion 40 and a lumen or passage 42 extending therethrough. The seat 38 is mechanically connected to or in mechanical communication with the shank 40 which is also mechanically connected to or in mechanical communication with the blade 34. The snorkel 32 and/or the lumen 42 have a generally longitudinal axis 43.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the seat 38 is generally circular in shape and has an upper surface 44 and a lower surface 46 which, as shown in FIG. 3, abuts or rests against the trabecular meshwork 21 to stabilize the glaucoma stent 30 within the eye 10. In modified embodiments, the seat 38 may efficaciously be shaped in other suitable manners, as required or desired, giving due consideration to the goals of stabilizing the glaucoma stent 30 within the eye 10 and/or of achieving one or more of the benefits and advantages as taught or suggested herein. For example, the seat 38 may be shaped in other polygonal or non-polygonal shapes and/or comprise one or more ridges which extend radially outwards, among other suitable retention devices.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, and as best seen in the top view of FIG. 5, the seat top surface 44 comprises fiducial marks or indicia 48. These marks or indicia 48 facilitate and ensure proper orientation and alignment of the stent 30 when implanted in the eye 10. The marks or indicia 48 may comprise visual differentiation means such as color contrast or be in the form of ribs, grooves, or the like. Alternatively, or in addition, the marks 48 may provide tactile sensory feedback to the surgeon. Also, the seat 38 and/or the seat top surface 44 may be configured in predetermined shapes aligned with the blade 34 and/or longitudinal axis 36 to provide for proper orientation of the stent device 30 within the eye 10. For example, the seat top surface 44 may be oval or ellipsoidal (FIG. 10), rectangular (FIG. 11), hexagonal (FIG. 12), among other suitable shapes (e.g. FIG. 13).


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, and as indicated above, the seat bottom surface 46 abuts or rests against the trabecular meshwork 21 to stabilize and retain the glaucoma stent 30 within the eye 10. For stabilization purposes, the seat bottom surface 46 may comprise a stubbed surface, a ribbed surface, a surface with pillars, a textured surface, or the like.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the snorkel shank 40 is generally cylindrical in shape. With the stent 30 implanted, as shown in FIG. 3, the shank 40 is generally positioned in an incision or cavity 50 formed in the trabecular meshwork 21 by the self-trephining stent 30. Advantageously, and as discussed further below, this single step of forming the cavity 50 by the stent 30 itself and placing the stent 30 in the desired position facilitates and expedites the overall surgical procedure. In modified embodiments, the snorkel shank 40 may efficaciously be shaped in other suitable manners, as required or desired. For example, the shank 40 may be in the shape of other polygonal or non-polygonal shapes, such as, oval, elliposoidal, and the like.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, and as best seen in FIG. 3, the shank 40 has an outer surface 52 in contact with the trabecular meshwork 21 surrounding the cavity 50. For stabilization purposes, the shank outer surface 52 may comprise a stubbed surface, a ribbed surface, a surface with pillars, a textured surface, or the like.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the snorkel lumen 42 has an inlet port, opening or orifice 54 at the seat top surface 44 and an outlet port, opening or orifice 56 at the junction of the shank 40 and blade 34. The lumen 42 is generally cylindrical in shape, that is, it has a generally circular cross-section, and its ports 54, 56 are generally circular in shape. In modified embodiments, the lumen 42 and ports 54, 56 may be efficaciously shaped in other manners, as required or desired, giving due consideration to the goals of providing sufficient aqueous outflow and/or of achieving one or more of the benefits and advantages as taught or suggested herein. For example, the lumen 42 and/or one or both ports 54, 56 may be shaped in the form of ovals, ellipsoids, and the like, or the lumen 42 may have a tapered or stepped configuration.


Referring in particular to FIG. 3, aqueous from the anterior chamber 20 flows into the lumen 42 through the inlet port 54 (as generally indicated by arrow 58) and out of the outlet port 56 and into Schlemm's canal 22 (as generally indicated by arrows 60) to lower and/or balance the intraocular pressure (IOP). In another embodiment, as discussed in further detail below, one or more of the outlet ports may be configured to face in the general direction of the stent longitudinal axis 36. In modified embodiments, the snorkel 32 may comprise more than one lumen, as needed or desired, to facilitate multiple aqueous outflow transportation into Schlemm's canal 22.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the blade longitudinal axis 36 and the snorkel longitudinal axis 43 are generally perpendicular to one another. Stated differently, the projections of the axes 36, 43 on a common plane which is not perpendicular to either of the axes 36, 43 intersect at 90°. The blade longitudinal axis 36 and the snorkel longitudinal axis 43 may intersect one another or may be offset from one another.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, the main body portion or blade 34 is a generally curved elongated sheet- or plate-like structure with an upper curved surface 62 and a lower curved surface 64 which defines a trough or open face channel 66. The perimeter of the blade 34 is generally defined by a curved proximal edge 68 proximate to the snorkel 32, a curved distal edge 70 spaced from the proximal edge 68 by a pair of generally straight lateral edges 72, 74 with the first lateral edge 72 extending beyond the second lateral edge 74 and intersecting with the distal edge 70 at a distal-most point 76 of the blade 34 proximate a blade cutting tip 78.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 3-9, and as shown in the enlarged view of FIG. 9, the cutting tip 78 comprises a first cutting edge 80 on the distal edge 70 and a second cutting edge 82 on the lateral edge 72. The cutting edges 80, 82 preferably extend from the distal-most point 76 of the blade 34 and comprise at least a respective portion of the distal edge 70 and lateral edge 72. The respective cutting edges 80, 82 are formed at the sharp edges of respective beveled or tapered surfaces 84, 86. In one embodiment, the remainder of the distal edge 70 and lateral edge 72 are dull or rounded. In one embodiment, the tip 78 proximate to the distal-most end 76 is curved slightly inwards, as indicated generally by the arrow 88 in FIG. 5 and arrow 88 (pointed perpendicular and into the plane of the paper) in FIG. 9, relative to the adjacent curvature of the blade 34.


In modified embodiments, suitable cutting edges may be provided on selected portions of one or more selected blade edges 68, 70, 72, 74 with efficacy, as needed or desired, giving due consideration to the goals of providing suitable cutting means on the stent 30 for effectively cutting through the trabecular meshwork 21 (FIG. 3) and/or of achieving one or more of the benefits and advantages as taught or suggested herein.


Referring in particular to FIG. 9, in one embodiment, the ratio between the lengths of the cutting edges 80, 82 is about 2:1. In another embodiment, the ratio between the lengths of the cutting edges 80, 82 is about 1:1. In yet another embodiment, the ratio between the lengths of the cutting edges 80, 82 is about 1:2. In modified embodiments, the lengths of the cutting edges 80, 82 may be efficaciously selected in other manners, as required or desired, giving due consideration to the goals of providing suitable cutting means on the stent 30 for effectively cutting through the trabecular meshwork 21 (FIG. 3) and/or of achieving one or more of the benefits and advantages as taught or suggested herein.


Still referring in particular to FIG. 9, in one embodiment, the ratio between the lengths of the cutting edges 80, 82 is in the range from about 2:1 to about 1:2. In another embodiment, the ratio between the lengths of the cutting edges 80, 82 is in the range from about 5:1 to about 1:5. In yet another embodiment, the ratio between the lengths of the cutting edges 80, 82 is in the range from about 10:1 to about 1:10. In modified embodiments, the lengths of the cutting edges 80, 82 may be efficaciously selected in other manners, as required or desired, giving due consideration to the goals of providing suitable cutting means on the stent 30 for effectively cutting through the trabecular meshwork 21 (FIG. 3) and/or of achieving one or more of the benefits and advantages as taught or suggested herein.


As shown in the top view of FIG. 9, the cutting edge 80 (and/or the distal end 70) and the cutting edge 82 (and/or the lateral edge 72) intersect at an angle θ. Stated differently, θ is the angle between the projections of the cutting edge 80 (and/or the distal end 70) and the cutting edge 82 (and/or the lateral edge 72) on a common plane which is not perpendicular to either of these edges.


Referring to in particular to FIG. 9, in one embodiment, the angle θ is about 50°. In another embodiment, the angle θ is in the range from about 40° to about 60°. In yet another embodiment, the angle θ is in the range from about 30° to about 70°. In modified embodiments, the angle θ may be efficaciously selected in other manners, as required or desired, giving due consideration to the goals of providing suitable cutting means on the stent 30 for effectively cutting through the trabecular meshwork 21 (FIG. 3) and/or of achieving one or more of the benefits and advantages as taught or suggested herein.


The stent 30 of the embodiments disclosed herein can be dimensioned in a wide variety of manners. Referring in particular to FIG. 3, the depth of Schlemm's canal 22 is typically about less than 400 microns (μm). Accordingly, the stunt blade 34 is dimensioned so that the height of the blade 34 (referred to as H41 in FIG. 4) is typically less than about 400 μm. The snorkel shank 40 is dimensioned so that it has a length (referred to as L41 in FIG. 4) typically in the range from about 100 μm to about 300 μm which is roughly the typical range of the thickness of the trabecular meshwork 21.


Of course, as the skilled artisan will appreciate, that with the stent 30 implanted, the blade 34 may rest at any suitable position within Schlemm's canal 22. For example, the blade 34 may be adjacent to a front wall 90 of Schlemm's canal 22 (as shown in FIG. 3), or adjacent to a back wall 92 of Schlemm's canal 22, or at some intermediate location therebetween, as needed or desired. Also, the snorkel shank 40 may extend into Schlemm's canal 22. The length of the snorkel shank 40 and/or the dimensions of the blade 34 may be efficaciously adjusted to achieve the desired implant positioning.


The trabecular stenting device 30 (FIGS. 3-9) of the exemplary embodiment may be manufactured or fabricated by a wide variety of techniques. These include, without limitation, by molding, thermo-forming, or other micro-machining techniques, among other suitable techniques.


The trabecular stenting device 30 preferably comprises a biocompatible material such that inflammation arising due to irritation between the outer surface of the device 30 and the surrounding tissue is minimized. Biocompatible materials which may be used for the device 30 preferably include, but are not limited to, titanium, titanium alloys, medical grade silicone, e.g., Silastic™, available from Dow Coming Corporation of Midland, Mich.; and polyurethane, e.g., Pellethane™, also available from Dow Corning Corporation.


In other embodiments, the stent device 30 may comprise other types of biocompatible material, such as, by way of example, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrolidone, collagen, heparinized collagen, polytetrafluoroethylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, fluorinated polymer, fluorinated elastomer, flexible fused silica, polyolefin, polyester, polysilicon, and/or a mixture of the aforementioned biocompatible materials, and the like. In still other embodiments, composite biocompatible material may be used, wherein a surface material may be used in addition to one or more of the aforementioned materials. For example, such a surface material may include polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (such as Teflon™), polyimide, hydrogel, heparin, therapeutic drugs (such as beta-adrenergic antagonists and other anti-glaucoma drugs, or antibiotics), and the like.


In an exemplary embodiment of the trabecular meshwork surgery, the patient is placed in the supine position, prepped, draped and anesthetized as necessary. In one embodiment, a small (less than about 1 mm) incision, which may be self-sealing is made through the cornea 12. The corneal incision can be made in a number of ways, for example, by using a micro-knife, among other tools.


An applicator or delivery apparatus is used to advance the glaucoma stent 30 through the corneal incision and to the trabecular meshwork 21. Some embodiments of such a delivery apparatus are disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/101,548, filed Mar. 18, 2002, entitled APPLICATOR AND METHODS FOR PLACING A TRABECULAR SHUNT FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/276,609, filed Mar. 16, 2001, entitled APPLICATOR AND METHODS FOR PLACING A TRABECULAR SHUNT FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT, the entire contents of each one of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Some embodiments of a delivery apparatus are also discussed in further detail later herein. Gonioscopic, microscopic, or endoscopic guidance may be used during the trabecular meshwork surgery.


With the device 30 held by the delivery apparatus, the blade 34 of the self-trephining glaucoma stent device 30 is used to cut and/or displace the material of the trabecular meshwork 21. The snorkel shank 40 may also facilitate in removal of this material during implantation. The delivery apparatus is withdrawn once the device 30 has been implanted in the eye 10. As shown in FIG. 3, once proper implantation has been accomplished the snorkel seat 38 rests on a top surface 94 of the trabecular meshwork 21, the snorkel shank 40 extends through the cavity 50 (created by the device 30) in the trabecular meshwork 21, and the blade extends inside Schlemm's canal 22.


Advantageously, the embodiments of the self-trephining stent device of the invention allow for a “one-step” procedure to make an incision in the trabecular meshwork and to subsequently implant the stent in the proper orientation and alignment within the eye to allow outflow of aqueous from the anterior chamber through the stent and into Schlemm's canal to lower and/or balance the intraocular pressure (IOP). Desirably, this provides for a faster, safer, and less expensive surgical procedure.


Many complications can arise in trabecular meshwork surgeries, wherein a knife is first used to create an incision in the trabecular meshwork, followed by removal of the knife and subsequent installation of the stent. For instance, the knife may cause some bleeding which clouds up the surgical site. This may require more effort and time to clean the surgical site prior to placement of the stent. Moreover, this may cause the intraocular pressure (IOP) to rise. Thus, undesirably, such a multiple step procedure may demand crisis management which slows down the surgery, makes it less safe, and more expensive.



FIG. 14 is a simplified partial view of an eye 10 illustrating the implantation of a self-trephining glaucoma stent device 30a having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. The stent 30a is generally similar to the stent 30 of FIGS. 3-9 except that its snorkel 32a comprises a longer shank 40a which extends into Schlemm's canal 22 and a lumen 42a which bifurcates into two output channels 45a.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 14, the shank 40a terminates at the blade 34. Aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20 into the lumen 42a through an inlet port 54a (as generally indicated by arrow 58a). Aqueous then flows through the output channels 45a and out of respective outlet ports 56a and into Schlemm's canal 22 (as generally indicated by arrows 60a). The outlet channels 45a extend radially outwards in generally opposed directions and the outlet ports 56a are configured to face in the general direction of the stent longitudinal axis 36 so that they open into Schlemm's canal 22 and are in proper orientation to allow aqueous outflow into Schlemm's canal 22 for lowering and/or balancing the intraocular pressure (IOP). As indicated above, fiducial marks or indicia and/or predetermined shapes of the snorkel seat 38 allow for proper orientation of the blade 34 and also the output channels 45a and respective ports 56a within Schlemm's canal.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 14, two outflow channels 45a are provided. In another embodiment, only one outflow channel 45a is provided. In yet another embodiment, more than two outflow channels 45a are provided. In modified embodiments, the lumen 42a may extend all the way through to the blade 34 and provide an outlet port as discussed above with reference to the embodiment of FIGS. 3-9.



FIG. 15 is a simplified partial view of an eye 10 illustrating the implantation of a self-trephining glaucoma stent device 30b having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. The stent 30b is generally similar to the stent 30 of FIGS. 3-9 except that its snorkel 32b comprises a longer shank 40b which extends into Schlemm's canal 22 and a lumen 42b which bifurcates into two output channels 45b.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 15, the shank 40b extends through the blade 34. Aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20 into the lumen 42b through an inlet port 54b (as generally indicated by arrow 58b). Aqueous then flows through the output channels 45b and out of respective outlet ports 56b and into Schlemm's canal 22 (as generally indicated by arrows 60b). The outlet channels 45b extend radially outwards in generally opposed directions and the outlet ports 56b are configured to face in the general direction of the stent longitudinal axis 36 so that they open into Schlemm's canal 22 and are in proper orientation to allow aqueous outflow into Schlemm's canal 22 for lowering and/or balancing the intraocular pressure (IOP). As indicated above, fiducial marks or indicia and/or predetermined shapes of the snorkel seat 38 allow for proper orientation of the blade 34 and also the output channels 45b and respective ports 56b within Schlemm's canal.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 15, two outflow channels 45b are provided. In another embodiment, only one outflow channel 45b is provided. In yet another embodiment, more than two outflow channels 45b are provided. In modified embodiments, the lumen 42b may extend all the way through to the blade 34 and provide an outlet port as discussed above with reference to the embodiment of FIGS. 3-9.



FIGS. 16-20 show different views of a self-trephining glaucoma stent device 30c having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. The stent 30c is generally similar to the stent 30 of FIGS. 3-9 except that it has a modified blade configuration. The stent 30c comprises a blade 34c which is a generally curved elongated sheet- or plate-like structure with an upper curved surface 62c and a lower curved surface 64c which defines a trough or open face channel 66c. The perimeter of the blade 34c is generally defined by a curved proximal edge 68c proximate to the snorkel 32, a curved distal edge 70c spaced from the proximal edge 68c by a pair of generally straight lateral edges 72c, 74c which are generally parallel to one another and have about the same length.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 16-20, the blade 34c comprises a cutting tip 78c. The cutting tip 78c preferably includes cutting edges formed on selected portions of the distal edge 70c and adjacent portions of the lateral edges 72c, 74c for cutting through the trabecular meshwork for placement of the snorkel 32. The cutting edges are sharp edges of beveled or tapered surfaces as discussed above in reference to FIG. 9. The embodiment of FIGS. 16-20 may be efficaciously modified to incorporate the snorkel configuration of the embodiments of FIGS. 14 and 15.



FIGS. 21-25 show different views of a self-trephining glaucoma stent device 30d having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. The stent 30d is generally similar to the stent 30 of FIGS. 3-9 except that it has a modified blade configuration. The stent 30d comprises a blade 34d which is a generally curved elongated sheet- or plate-like structure with an upper curved surface 62d and a lower curved surface 64d which defines a trough or open face channel 66d. The perimeter of the blade 34d is generally defined by a curved proximal edge 68d proximate to the snorkel 32, a pair of inwardly converging curved distal edges 70d′, 70d″ spaced from the proximal edge 68d by a pair of generally straight respective lateral edges 72d, 74d which are generally parallel to one another and have about the same length. The distal edges 70d′, 70d″ intersect at a distal-most point 76d of the blade 34d proximate a blade cutting tip 78d.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 21-25, the cutting tip 78d preferably includes cutting edges formed on the distal edges 70d′, 70d″ and extending from the distal-most point 76d of the blade 34d. In one embodiment, the cutting edges extend along only a portion of respective distal edges 70d′, 70d″. In another embodiment, the cutting edges extend along substantially the entire length of respective distal edges 70d′, 70d″. In yet another embodiment, at least portions of the lateral edges 72d, 74d proximate to respective distal edges 70d′, 70d″ have cutting edges. In a further embodiment, the tip 78d proximate to the distal-most end 76d is curved slightly inwards, as indicated generally by the arrow 88d in FIG. 21 and arrow 88d (pointed perpendicular and into the plane of the paper) in FIG. 22, relative to the adjacent curvature of the blade 34d.


In the embodiment of FIGS. 21-25, the cutting edges are sharp edges of beveled or tapered surfaces as discussed above in reference to FIG. 9. The embodiment of FIGS. 21-25 may be efficaciously modified to incorporate the snorkel configuration of the embodiments of FIGS. 14 and 15.



FIGS. 26-28 show different views of a self-trephining glaucoma stent device 30e having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. The stent device 30e generally comprises a snorkel 32e mechanically connected to or in mechanical communication with a blade or cutting tip 34e. The snorkel 32e has a seat, head or cap portion 38e mechanically connected to or in mechanical communication with a shank 40e, as discussed above. The shank 40e has a distal end or base 47e. The snorkel 32e further has a lumen 42e which bifurcates into a pair of outlet channels 45e, as discussed above in connection with FIGS. 14 and 15. Other lumen and inlet and outlet port configurations as taught or suggested herein may also be efficaciously used, as needed or desired.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 26-28, the blade 34e extends downwardly and outwardly from the shank distal end 47e. The blade 34e is angled relative to a generally longitudinal axis 43e of the snorkel 32e, as best seen in FIGS. 27 and 28. The blade 34e has a distal-most point 76e. The blade or cutting tip 34e has a pair of side edges 70e′, 70e″, including cutting edges, terminating at the distal-most point 76e, as best seen in FIG. 26. In one embodiment, the cutting edges are sharp edges of beveled or tapered surfaces as discussed above in reference to FIG. 9.


Referring to FIGS. 26-28, in one embodiment, the blade 34e includes cutting edges formed on the edges 70e′, 70e″ and extending from the distal-most point 76e of the blade 34d. In one embodiment, the cutting edges extend along only a portion of respective distal edges 70e′, 70e″. In another embodiment, the cutting edges extend along substantially the entire length of respective distal edges 70e′, 70e″. In yet another embodiment, the blade or cutting tip 34e comprises a bent tip of needle, for example, a 30 gauge needle.


In general, any of the blade configurations disclosed herein may be used in conjunction with any of the snorkel configurations disclosed herein or incorporated by reference herein to provide a self-trephining glaucoma stent device for making an incision in the trabecular meshwork for receiving the corresponding snorkel to provide a pathway for aqueous outflow from the eye anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal, thereby effectively lowering and/or balancing the intraocular pressure (IOP). The self-trephining ability of the device, advantageously, allows for a “one-step” procedure in which the incision and placement of the snorkel are accomplished by a single device and operation. In any of the embodiments, fiducial markings or indicia, and/or preselected configuration of the snorkel seat, and/or positioning of the stent device in a preloaded applicator may be used for proper orientation and alignment of the device during implantation.


Delivery Apparatus


In many cases, a surgeon works from a temporal incision when performing cataract or goniometry surgery. FIG. 29 illustrates a temporal implant procedure, wherein a delivery apparatus or “applicator” 100 having a curved tip 102 is used to deliver a stent 30 to a temporal side 27 of the eye 10. An incision 28 is made in the cornea 10, as discussed above. The apparatus 100 is then used to introduce the stent 30 through the incision 28 and implant it within the eye 10.


Still referring in particular to FIG. 29, in one embodiment, a similarly curved instrument would be used to make the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, a self-trephining stent device 30 may be used to make this incision through the trabecular meshwork 21, as discussed above. The temporal implantation procedure illustrated in FIG. 29 may be employed with the any of the various stent embodiments taught or suggested herein.



FIG. 30 illustrates one embodiment of an apparatus comprising an articulating stent applicator or retrieval device 100a. In this embodiment, a proximal arm 106 is attached to a distal arm 108 at a joint 112. This joint 112 is movable such that an angle formed between the proximal arm 106 and the distal arm 108 can change. One or more claws 114 can extend from the distal arm 108, in the case of a stent retrieval device. Similarly, this articulation mechanism may be used for the trabecular stent applicator, and thus the articulating applicator or retrieval device 100a may be either an applicator for the trabecular stent, a retrieval device, or both, in various embodiments. The embodiment of FIG. 30 may be employed with the any of the various stent embodiments taught or suggested herein.



FIG. 31 shows another illustrative method for placing any of the various stent embodiments taught or suggested herein at the implant site within the eye 10. A delivery apparatus 100b generally comprises a syringe portion 116 and a cannula portion 118. The distal section of the cannula 118 has at least one irrigating hole 120 and a distal space 122 for holding the stent device 30. The proximal end 124 of the lumen of the distal space 122 is sealed from the remaining lumen of the cannula portion 118. The delivery apparatus of FIG. 30 may be employed with the any of the various stent embodiments taught or suggested herein.


In one aspect of the invention, a delivery apparatus (or “applicator”) is used for placing a trabecular stent through a trabecular meshwork of an eye. Certain embodiments of such a delivery apparatus are disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/101,548, filed Mar. 18, 2002, entitled APPLICATOR AND METHODS FOR PLACING A TRABECULAR SHUNT FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/276,609, filed Mar. 16, 2001, entitled APPLICATOR AND METHODS FOR PLACING A TRABECULAR SHUNT FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT, the entire contents of each one of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.


The stent has an inlet section and an outlet section. The delivery apparatus includes a handpiece, an elongate tip, a holder and an actuator. The handpiece has a distal end and a proximal end. The elongate tip is connected to the distal end of the handpiece. The elongate tip has a distal portion and is configured to be placed through a corneal incision and into an anterior chamber of the eye. The holder is attached to the distal portion of the elongate tip. The holder is configured to hold and release the inlet section of the trabecular stent. The actuator is on the handpiece and actuates the holder to release the inlet section of the trabecular stent from the holder. When the trabecular stent is deployed from the delivery apparatus into the eye, the outlet section is positioned in substantially opposite directions inside Schlemm's canal. In one embodiment, a deployment mechanism within the delivery apparatus includes a push-pull type plunger.


In some embodiments, the holder comprises a clamp. In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises a spring within the handpiece that is configured to be loaded when the stent is being held by the holder, the spring being at least partially unloaded upon actuating the actuator, allowing for release of the stent from the holder.


In various embodiments, the clamp comprises a plurality of claws configured to exert a clamping force onto the inlet section of the stent. The holder may also comprise a plurality of flanges.


In some embodiments, the distal portion of the elongate tip is made of a flexible material. This can be a flexible wire. The distal portion can have a deflection range, preferably of about 45 degrees from the long axis of the handpiece.


The delivery apparatus can further comprise an irrigation port in the elongate tip.


Some aspects include a method of placing a trabecular stent through a trabecular meshwork of an eye, the stent having an inlet section and an outlet section, including advancing a delivery apparatus holding the trabecular stent through an anterior chamber of the eye and into the trabecular meshwork, placing part of the stent through the trabecular meshwork and into a Schlemm's canal of the eye; and releasing the stent from the delivery apparatus.


In various embodiments, the method includes using a delivery apparatus that comprises a handpiece having a distal end and a proximal end; an elongate tip connected to the distal end of the handpiece, the elongate tip having a distal portion and being configured to be placed through a corneal incision and into an anterior chamber of the eye; a holder attached to the distal portion of the elongate tip, the holder configured to hold and release the inlet section of the trabecular stent; and an actuator on the handpiece that actuates the holder to release the inlet section of the trabecular stent from the holder.


In one aspect, the trabecular stent is removably attached to a delivery apparatus (also known as “applicator”). When the trabecular stent is deployed from the delivery apparatus into the eye, the outlet section is positioned in substantially opposite directions inside Schlemm's canal. In one embodiment, a deployment mechanism within the delivery apparatus includes a push-pull type plunger. In some embodiments, the delivery applicator may be a guidewire, an expandable basket, an inflatable balloon, or the like.


Other Embodiments


Screw/Barb Anchored Stent:



FIGS. 32 and 33 illustrate a glaucoma stent device 30f having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This embodiment of the trabecular stent 30f includes a barbed or threaded screw-like extension or pin 126 with barbs 128 for anchoring. The barbed pin 126 extends from a distal or base portion 130 of the stent 30f.


In use, the stent 30f (FIG. 32) is advanced through the trabecular meshwork 21 and across Schlemm's canal 22. The barbed (or threaded) extension 126 penetrates into the back wall 92 of Schlemm's canal 22 up to the shoulder or base 130 that then rests on the back wall 92 of the canal 22. The combination of a shoulder 130 and a barbed pin 126 of a particular length limits the penetration depth of the barbed pin 126 to a predetermined or preselected distance. In one embodiment, the length of the pin 126 is about 0.5 mm or less. Advantageously, this barbed configuration provides a secure anchoring of the stent 30f. As discussed above, correct orientation of the stent 30f is ensured by appropriate fiducial marks, indicia or the like and by positioning of the stent in a preloaded applicator.


Referring to FIG. 32, the aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20, through the lumen 42f, then out through two side-ports 56f to be directed in both directions along Schlemm's canal 22. Alternatively, flow could be directed in only one direction through a single side-port 56f. In other embodiments, more than two outlet ports 56f, for example, six to eight ports (like a pin wheel configuration), may be efficaciously used, as needed or desired.


Still referring to FIG. 32, in one embodiment, the stent 30f is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30f may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Deeply Threaded Stent:



FIG. 34 illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30g having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. The stent 30g has a head or seat 38g and a shank or main body portion 40g with a base or distal end 132. This embodiment of the trabecular stent 30g includes a deep thread 134 (with threads 136) on the main body 40g of the stent 30g below the head 38g. The threads may or may not extend all the way to the base 132.


In use, the stent 30g (FIG. 34) is advanced through the meshwork 21 through a rotating motion, as with a conventional screw. Advantageously, the deep threads 136 provide retention and stabilization of the stent 30g in the trabecular meshwork 21.


Referring to FIG. 34, the aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20, through the lumen 42g, then out through two side-ports 56g to be directed in both directions along Schlemm's canal 22. Alternatively, flow could be directed in only one direction through a single side-port 56g. In other embodiments, more than two outlet ports 56g may be efficaciously used, as needed or desired.


One suitable applicator or delivery apparatus for this stent 30g (FIG. 34) includes a preset rotation, for example, via a wound torsion spring or the like. The rotation is initiated by a release trigger on the applicator. A final twist of the applicator by the surgeon and observation of suitable fiducial marks, indicia or the like ensure proper alignment of the side ports 56g with Schlemm's canal 22.


Referring to FIG. 34, in one embodiment, the stent 30g is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30g may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Rivet Style Stent:



FIG. 35 illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30h having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. The stent has a base or distal end 138. This embodiment of the trabecular stent 30h has a pair of flexible ribs 140. In the unused state, the ribs are initially generally straight (that is, extend in the general direction of arrow 142).


Referring to FIG. 35, upon insertion of the stent 30h through the trabecular meshwork 21, the ends 144 of respective ribs 140 of the stent 30h come to rest on the back wall 92 of Schlemm's canal 22. Further advancement of the stent 30h causes the ribs 140 to deform to the bent shape as shown in the drawing of FIG. 35. The ribs 140 are designed to first buckle near the base 138 of the stent 30h. Then the buckling point moves up the ribs 140 as the shank part 40h of the stent 30h is further advanced through the trabecular meshwork 21.


The lumen 42h (FIG. 35) in the stent 30h is a simple straight hole. The aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20, through the lumen 42h, then out around the ribs 140 to the collector channels further along Schlemm's canal 22 in either direction.


Referring to FIG. 35, in one embodiment, the stent 30h is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30h may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Grommet Style Stent:



FIG. 36A illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30i having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This embodiment of the trabecular stent 30i includes a head or seat 38i, a tapered base portion 146 and an intermediate narrower waist portion or shank 40i.


In use, the stent 30i (FIG. 36A) is advanced through the trabecular meshwork 21 and the base 146 is pushed into Schlemm's canal 22. The stent 30i is pushed slightly further, if necessary, until the meshwork 21 stretched by the tapered base 146 relaxes back and then contracts to engage the smaller diameter portion waist 40i of the stent 30i. Advantageously, the combination of the larger diameter head or seat 38i and base 146 of the stent 30i constrains undesirable stent movement. As discussed above, correct orientation of the stent 30i is ensured by appropriate fiducial marks, indicia or the like and by positioning of the stent in a preloaded applicator.


Referring to FIG. 36A, the aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20, through the lumen 42i, then out through two side-ports 56i to be directed in both directions along Schlemm's canal 22. Alternatively, flow could be directed in only one direction through a single side-port 56i. In other embodiments, more than two outlet ports 56i may be efficaciously used, as needed or desired.


Still referring to FIG. 36A, in one embodiment, the stent 30i is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30i may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.



FIG. 36B and FIG. 36C illustrate another embodiment of a trabecular stent 30i′. FIG. 36B shows the glaucoma stent device 30i′ from the side while FIG. 36C shows the glaucoma stent device 30i′ from a base-biased three-quarters view. The glaucoma stent device 30i′ includes a head or seat 38i′ with a head or seat depth 38d, a waist portion or shank 40i′ with a waist portion or shank external diameter 40n and a waist portion or shank depth 40m, a lumen 42i′, a side-port 56i′, a tapered base 146′, an angle α, and an angle θ.


In operation, the glaucoma stent device 30i′ of FIG. 36B and 36C is advanced through the trabecular meshwork 21 of FIG. 2 and the tapered base 146′ is pushed into Schlemm's canal 22 of FIG. 2. The glaucoma stent device 30i′ is pushed slightly further, if necessary, until the meshwork 21 of FIG. 2 stretched by the tapered base 146′ relaxes back and then contracts to engage the smaller diameter portion waist portion or shank 40i′ of the glaucoma stent device 30i′. Advantageously, the combination of the larger diameter head or seat 38i′ and tapered base 146′ of the glaucoma stent device 30i′ increases the implantation success and constrains undesirable stent movement. In some embodiments, a hole is made in the trabecular meshwork 21 of FIG. 2 with a device (such as, but not limited to a knife, trephine, punch, drill, scalpel, trocar, or blade) before the glaucoma stent device 30i′ is introduced into the anterior chamber of the eye. In other embodiments, a hole is made in the trabecular meshwork 21 of FIG. 2 using the delivery device used to deliver the glaucoma stent device 30i′ to the trabecular meshwork 21 of FIG. 21.


Generally, the tapered base 146′ is attached to the waist portion or shank 40i′ which is attached to the head or seat 38i′ to form the glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36B and 36C. A lumen 42i′ runs from the top of the head or seat 38i′ to the bottom of the tapered base 146′ to provide a fluid channel from the anterior chamber to the internal lumen of Schlemm's canal.


In some embodiments, there are four side-ports 56i′ intersecting the lumen 42i′ in the region of the tapered base 146′. In some embodiments, the at least one side-port 56i′ intersects perpendicular to the lumen 42i′ (as shown in FIGS. 36B and 36C). In some embodiments, the side-ports 56i′ intersect each other in a perpendicular fashion (as shown in FIGS. 36B and 36C). In some embodiments, there is only one side-port 56i′. In some embodiments, there are two side-ports 56i′, three side-ports 56i′, four side-ports 56i′, five side-ports 56i′, or six side-ports 56i′. The side-ports 56i′ can be generally parallel to the axis of Schlemm's canal or simply positioned to be aligned in or near Schlemm's canal. The side-ports 56i′ and provide for additional flow of aqueous from the anterior chamber to the lumen of Schlemm's canal. Side-ports 56i′ can be particularly useful if the terminal end of the lumen 42i′ residing in Schlemm's canal either becomes plugged or abuts the wall of Schlemm's canal and has concomitantly lower or decreased or even arrested fluid flow.


In some embodiments, the head or seat 38i′of the glaucoma stent device 30i′ has a diameter in the range of about 100-3000 μm, about 150-3750 μm, about 200-3500 μm, about 200-3250 μm, about 250-3000 μm, about 300-2750 μm, about 350-2500 μm, about 375-2250 μm, about 400-2000 μm, about 450-1750 μm, about 500-1500 μm, about 550-1250 μm, about 600-1000 μm, and about 650-800 μm or any other diameter which fits within the eye and serves to anchor the glaucoma stent device 30i′ appropriately.


In some embodiments, the head or seat depth 38d of the glaucoma stent device 30i′ is in the range of about 50-1000 μm, about 60-900 μm, about 70-800 μm, about 80-700 μm, about 90-600 μm, about 100-500 μm, about 110-400 μm, and about 120-300 including about 130-200 μm or any other depth which allows the glaucoma stent device 30i′ to seat in the eye and maintain structural integrity and/or alignment of side-ports 56i′ to Schlemm's canal.


In some embodiments, the waist portion or shank depth 40m of the glaucoma stent device 30i′ is approximately equal to the thickness of the trabecular meshwork 21 of FIG. 2, including the range of about 100-500 μm, about 110-450 μm, about 120-400 μm, about 130-350 μm, about 140-300 μm, about 150-250 μm, and about 160-200 μm.


In some embodiments, the waist portion or shank external diameter 40n of the glaucoma stent device 30i′ is in the range of about 100-1500 μm, about 150-1400 μm, about 160-1300 μm, about 170-1200 μm, about 180-1100 μm, about 190-1000 μm, about 200-900 μm, about 210-800 μm, about 220-700 μm, about 230-600 μm, about 240-500 μm, about 250-400, and about 260-300 μm.


In some embodiments, angle α formed by the attachment of the head or seat 38i′ to the waist portion or shank 40i′ is in the range of about 5-45°, about 7.5-40°, about 10-35°, about 12.5-30°, about 15-25°, and about 17.5-20°. Generally, the lower the angle α, the more of the head or seat 38i′portion of the glaucoma stent device 30i′ can be in contact with the trabecular meshwork 21 of FIG. 2.


In some embodiments, the angle θ of the tapered base 146′ is in the range of about 45-80°, about 47.5-77.5°, about 50-75°, about 52.5-72.5°, about 55-70°, about 57.5-67.5°, and about 60-65° or any other angle appropriate for fitting inside Schlemm's canal and helping in anchoring the glaucoma stent device 30i′ in the eye.


In some embodiments, the tapered base 146′ is approximately as deep as is Schlemm's canal. In some embodiments, the periphery of the tapered base 146′ is approximately equal to the periphery of the cross section of Schlemm's canal. In some embodiments, the tapered base 146′ is flattened (as shown in FIG. 36B. In some embodiments, the tapered base 146′ is not flattened and can extend into the tissue of the wall of Schlemm's canal to anchor the glaucoma stent device 30i′.



FIGS. 36D, 36E, and 36F illustrate another embodiment of a glaucoma stent device 30i′. The glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36D-36F can have approximately the same structures as the glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIG. 36B and 36C described immediately above, including but not limited to a tapered base 146′, a waist portion or shank 40i′, a head or seat 38i′, a lumen 42i′, and at least one side-port 56i′. In addition to the aforementioned features, in some embodiments, the glaucoma stent device 30i′ of FIGS. 36D-36F can include at least one head or seat side-port 57i′.


In some embodiments, the head or seat side-port 57i′ can extend through the head or seat 38i′ (e.g., parallel to the planar surface of the head or seat 38i′). In some embodiments, the head or seat side-port 57i′ can be disposed parallel to the at least one side-port 56i′ in the tapered base 146′.


In some embodiments, there are four head or seat side-ports 57i′ intersecting the lumen 42i′ in the region of the head or seat 38i′. In some embodiments, the at least one head or seat side-port 57i′ intersects perpendicular to the lumen 42i′ (as shown in FIG. 36D). In some embodiments, the head or seat side-ports 57i′ intersect each other in a perpendicular fashion (as shown in FIG. 36E). In some embodiments, there is only one head or seat side-port 57i′. In some embodiments, there are two head or seat side-ports 57i′, three head or seat side-ports 57i′, four head or seat side-ports 57i′, five head or seat side-ports 57i′, or six head or seat side-ports 57i′. The head or seat side-ports 57i′ can be generally parallel to the axis of Schlemm's canal. In some embodiments, when in an implanted location, the head or seat side-ports 57i′ can be located in the anterior chamber of the eye. The head or seat side-ports 57i′ can provide for additional flow of aqueous from the anterior chamber to the lumen of Schlemm's canal.


The glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36D, 36E, and 36F can be particularly useful in closed angle patients. Additionally, this glaucoma stent device 30i′ can be inserted into the eye in combination with an iridotomy to create an improved outflow pathway in the aforementioned closed angle cases.



FIGS. 36G, 36H, and 36I illustrate another embodiment of a glaucoma stent device 30i′. The glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36G-36I can have approximately the same structures as the glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36D, 36E, and 36F described immediately above, including but not limited to a tapered base 146′, a waist portion or shank 40i′, a head or seat 38i′, a lumen 42i′, and at least one side-port 56i′. In addition to the aforementioned features, in some embodiments, the glaucoma stent device 30i′ of FIGS. 36G-36I can includes at least one head or seat half-cylinder side-port 57j′.


In some embodiments, the head or seat half-cylinder side-port 57j′ can extend through the head or seat 38i′ (e.g., parallel to the planar surface of the head or seat 38i′). In some embodiments, the head or seat half-cylinder side-port 57j′ can be disposed parallel to the at least one side-port 56i′ in the tapered base 146′.


In some embodiments, there are four head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′ intersecting the lumen 42i′ in the region of the head or seat 38i′. In some embodiments, the at least one head or seat half-cylinder side-port 57j′ intersects perpendicular to the lumen 42i′ (as shown in FIG. 36G). In some embodiments, the head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′ intersect each other in a perpendicular fashion (as shown in FIG. 36H). In some embodiments, there is only one head or seat half-cylinder side-port 57j′. In some embodiments, there are two head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′, three head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′, four head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′, five head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′, or six head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′. The head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′ can be generally parallel to the axis of Schlemm's canal. In some embodiments, when in an implanted location, the head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′ can be located in the anterior chamber of the eye. The head or seat half-cylinder side-ports 57j′ can provide for additional flow of aqueous from the anterior chamber to the lumen of Schlemm's canal. The glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36G, 36H, and 36I can be particularly useful in closed angle patients. Additionally, this glaucoma stent device 30i′ can be inserted into the eye in combination with an iridotomy to create an improved outflow pathway in the aforementioned closed angle cases.



FIGS. 36J and 36K illustrate another embodiment of a glaucoma stent device 30i′. The glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36J and 36K can have approximately the same structures as the glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36D, 36E, and 36F described above, including but not limited to a tapered base 146′, a waist portion or shank 40i′, a head or seat 38i′, a lumen 42i′, and at least one side-port 56i′. In addition to the aforementioned features, in some embodiments, the glaucoma stent device 30i′ of FIGS. 36J and 36K can include a head or seat shank 40k′, a head or seat button 38k′, a head or seat button dome 38n, and at least one head or seat shank side-port 57k′.


In some embodiments, the head or seat shank 40k′ can extend from the back of the head or seat 38i′. In some embodiments, the head or seat shank 40k′ can have a diameter less than the diameter of the head or seat 38i′. In some embodiments, the diameter of the head or seat shank 40k′ can be in the range of about 20-100% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′, about 30-90% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′, about 40-80% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′ about 50-70% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′, and about 60% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′.


In some embodiments, the head or seat shank 40k′ has a thickness in the range of about 100-500 μm, about 110-450 μm, about 120-400 μm, about 130-350 μm, about 140-300 μm, about 150-250 μm, and about 160-200 μm.


In some embodiments, the head or seat button 38k′ can extend from the back of the head or seat shank 40k′. In some embodiments, the head or seat button 38k′ can have a head or seat button dome 38n. In other embodiments, the head or seat button 38k′ is flat. In some embodiments, the head or seat button 38k′ can have a diameter the same as the diameter of the head or seat 38i′. In some embodiments, the head or seat button 38k′ can have a diameter that is greater than the diameter of the head or seat 38i′. In some embodiments, the head or seat button 38k′ can have a diameter that is less than the diameter of the head or seat 38i′. In some embodiments, the diameter of the head or seat button 38k′ can be in the range of about 50-150% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′, about 60-140% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′, about 70-130% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′, about 80-120% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′, about 90-110% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′, and about 100% of the diameter of the head or seat 38i′.


In some embodiments, the head or seat button 38k′ has a thickness in the range of about 100-500 μm, about 110-450 μm, about 120-400 μm, about 130-350 μm, about 140-300 μm, about 150-250 μm, and about 160-200 μm.


In some embodiments, the head or seat shank side-port 57k′ can extend through the head or seat shank 40k′ (e.g., parallel to the planar surface of the head or seat 38i′). In some embodiments, the head or seat shank side-port 57k′ can be disposed parallel to the at least one side-port 56i′ in the tapered base 146′.


In some embodiments, there are four head or seat shank side-ports 57k′ intersecting the lumen 42i′ in the region of the head or seat shank 40k′. In some embodiments, the at least one head or seat shank side-port 57k′ intersects perpendicular to the lumen 42i′ (as shown in FIG. 36J). In some embodiments, the head or seat shank side-ports 57k′ intersect each other in a perpendicular fashion (as shown in FIGS. 36J and 36K). In some embodiments, there is only one head or seat shank side-port 57k′. In some embodiments, there are two head or seat shank side-ports 57k′, three head or seat shank side-ports 57k′, four head or seat shank side-ports 57k′, five head or seat shank side-ports 57k′, or six head or seat shank side-ports 57k′. The head or seat shank side-ports 57k′ can be generally parallel to the axis of Schlemm's canal. In some embodiments, when in an implanted location, the head or seat shank side-port 57k′ can be located in the anterior chamber of the eye. The head or seat shank side-ports 57k′ can provide for additional flow of aqueous from the anterior chamber to the lumen of Schlemm's canal. The glaucoma stent device 30i′ illustrated in FIGS. 36J and 36K can be particularly useful in closed angle patients. Additionally, this glaucoma stent device 30i′ can be inserted into the eye in combination with an iridotomy to create an improved outflow pathway in the aforementioned closed angle cases.


In some embodiments, one or more of the glaucoma stent devices discussed above may be delivered into the eye with a delivery device such as disclosed in the attached Appendix A which is a part of the present specification. One or more glaucoma stents may be preloaded onto the delivery device to form a glaucoma stent/delivery device system.


Biointeractive Stent:



FIG. 37 illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30j having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This embodiment of the trabecular stent 30j utilizes a region of biointeractive material 148 that provides a site for the trabecular meshwork 21 to firmly grip the stent 30j by ingrowth of the tissue into the biointeractive material 148. As shown in FIG. 37, preferably the biointeractive layer 148 is applied to those surfaces of the stent 30j which would abut against or come in contact with the trabecular meshwork 21.


In one embodiment, the biointeractive layer 148 (FIG. 37) may be a region of enhanced porosity with a growth promoting chemical. In one embodiment, a type of bio-glue 150 that dissolves over time is used to hold the stent secure during the time between insertion and sufficient ingrowth for stabilization. As discussed above, correct orientation of the stent 30j is ensured by appropriate fiducial marks, indicia or the like and by positioning of the stent in a preloaded applicator.


Referring to FIG. 37, the aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20, through the lumen 42j, then out through two side-ports 56j to be directed in both directions along Schlemm's canal 22. Alternatively, flow could be directed in only one direction through a single side-port 56j. In other embodiments, more than two outlet ports 56j may be efficaciously used, as needed or desired.


Still referring to FIG. 37, in one embodiment, the stent 30j is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30j may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Glued or Welded Stent:



FIG. 38 illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30k having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This embodiment of the trabecular stent 30k is secured in place by using a permanent (non-dissolving) bio-glue 152 or a “welding” process (e.g. heat) to form a weld 152. The stent 30k has a head or seat 38k and a lower surface 46k.


The stent 30k is advanced through the trabecular meshwork 21 until the head or seat 38k comes to rest on the trabecular meshwork 21, that is, the head lower surface 46k abuts against the trabecular meshwork 21, and the glue or weld 152 is applied or formed therebetween, as shown in FIG. 38. As discussed above, correct orientation of the stent 30k is ensured by appropriate fiducial marks, indicia or the like and by positioning of the stent in a preloaded applicator.


Referring to FIG. 38, the aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20, through the lumen 42k, then out through two side-ports 56k to be directed in both directions along Schlemm's canal 22. Alternatively, flow could be directed in only one direction through a single side-port 56k. In other embodiments, more than two outlet ports 56k may be efficaciously used, as needed or desired.


Still referring to FIG. 38, in one embodiment, the stent 30k is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30k may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Hydrophilic Latching Stent:



FIG. 39 illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30m having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This embodiment of the trabecular stent 30m is fabricated from a hydrophilic material that expands with absorption of water. Desirably, this would enable the device 30m to be inserted through a smaller incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. The subsequent expansion (illustrated by the smaller arrows 154) of the stent 30m would advantageously enable it to latch in place in the trabecular meshwork 21. As discussed above, correct orientation of the stent 30m is ensured by appropriate fiducial marks, indicia or the like and by positioning of the stent in a preloaded applicator.


Referring to FIG. 39, the aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20, through the lumen 42m, then out through two side-ports 56m to be directed in both directions along Schlemm's canal 22. Alternatively, flow could be directed in only one direction through a single side-port 56m. In other embodiments, more than two outlet ports 56m may be efficaciously used, as needed or desired.


Still referring to FIG. 39, in one embodiment, the stent 30m is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30m may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Photodynamic Stent:



FIG. 40 illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30n having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This embodiment of the trabecular stent 30n is fabricated from a photodynamic material that expands on exposure to light.


It is commonly known that there is a diurnal variation in the aqueous humor production by the eye—it is higher during the day than it is at night. The lumen 42n of the stent 30n responds to light entering the cornea during the day by expanding and allowing higher flow of aqueous through the lumen 42n and into Schlemm's canal 22. This expansion is generally indicated by the smaller arrows 156 (FIG. 40) which show the lumen 42n (and ports) expanding or opening in response to light stimulus. (The light or radiation energy E is generally given by E=hν, where h is Planck's constant and νis the frequency.) At night, in darkness, the lumen diameter decreases and reduces the flow allowed through the lumen 42n. In one embodiment, an excitation wavelength that is different from that commonly encountered is provided on an as-needed basis to provide higher flow of aqueous to Schlemm's canal 22.


This photodynamic implementation is shown in FIG. 40 for the self-latching style of stent 30n, but can be efficaciously used with any of the other stent embodiments, as needed or desired. As discussed above, correct orientation of the stent 30n is ensured by appropriate fiducial marks, indicia or the like and by positioning of the stent in a preloaded applicator.


Referring to FIG. 40, the aqueous flows from the anterior chamber 20, through the lumen 42n, then out through two side-ports 56n to be directed in both directions along Schlemm's canal 22. Alternatively, flow could be directed in only one direction through a single side-port 56n. In other embodiments, more than two outlet ports 56n may be efficaciously used, as needed or desired.


Still referring to FIG. 40, in one embodiment, the stent 30n is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30n may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Collector Channel Alignment Stent:



FIG. 41 illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30p having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This figure depicts an embodiment of a stent 30p that directs aqueous from the anterior chamber 20 directly into a collector channel 29 which empties into aqueous veins. The stent 30p has a base or distal end 160.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 41, a removable alignment pin 158 is utilized to align the stent lumen 42p with the collector channel 29. In use, the pin 158 extends through the stent lumen 42p and protrudes through the base 160 and extends into the collector channel 29 to center and/or align the stent 30p over the collector channel 29. The stent 30p is then pressed firmly against the back wall 92 of Schlemm's canal 22. A permanent bio-glue 162 is used between the stent base and the back wall 92 of Schlemm's canal 22 to seat and securely hold the stent 30p in place. Once positioned, the pin 158 is withdrawn from the lumen 42p to allow the aqueous to flow directly from the anterior chamber 20 into the collector duct 29. The collector ducts are nominally 20 to 100 micrometers (μm) in diameter and are visualized with a suitable microscopy method (such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM)) or laser imaging to provide guidance for placement of the stent 30p.


Referring to FIG. 41, in one embodiment, the stent 30p is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30p may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Barbed Stent (Anterior Chamber to Collector Channel):



FIG. 42 illustrates a glaucoma stent device 30q having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This figure depicts an embodiment of a stent 30q that directs aqueous from the anterior chamber 20 directly into a collector channel 29 which empties into aqueous veins. The stent 30q has a base or distal end 166 and the channel 29 has wall(s) 164.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 42, a barbed, small-diameter extension or pin 168 on the stent base 166 is guided into the collector channel 29 and anchors on the wall(s) 164 of the channel 29. The pin 168 has barbs 170 which advantageously provide anchoring of the stent 30q. The collector ducts 29 are nominally 20 to 100 micrometers (μm) in diameter and are visualized with a suitable microscopy method (such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM)) or laser imaging to provide guidance for placement of the stent.


Referring to FIG. 42, in one embodiment, the stent 30q is inserted through a previously made incision in the trabecular meshwork 21. In other embodiments, the stent 30q may be combined with any of the blade configurations taught or suggested herein to provide self-trephining capability. In these cases, the incision through the trabecular meshwork 21 is made by the self-trephining stent device which has a blade at its base or proximate to the base.


Valved Tube Stent (Anterior Chamber to Choroid):



FIG. 43 illustrates a valved tube stent device 30r having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This is an embodiment of a stent 30r that provides a channel for flow between the anterior chamber 20 and the highly vascular choroid 17. Clinically, the choroid 17 can be at pressures lower than those desired for the eye 10. Therefore, this stent 30r includes a valve with an opening pressure equal to the desired pressure difference between the choroid 17 and the anterior chamber 10 or a constriction that provide the desired pressure drop.


Osmotic Membrane (Anterior Chamber to Choroid):



FIG. 44 illustrates an osmotic membrane device 30s having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This embodiment provides a channel for flow between the anterior chamber 20 and the highly vascular choroid 17. The osmotic membrane 30s is used to replace a portion of the endothelial layer of the choroid 17. Since the choroid 17 is highly vascular with blood vessels, the concentration of water on the choroid side is lower than in the anterior chamber 20 of the eye 10. Therefore, the osmotic gradient drives water from the anterior chamber 20 into the choroid 17.


Clinically, the choroid 17 (FIG. 44) can be at pressures lower than those desired for the eye 10. Therefore, desirably, both osmotic pressure and the physical pressure gradient are in favor of flow into the choroid 17. Flow control is provided by proper sizing of the area of the membrane,—the larger the membrane area is the larger the flow rate will be. This advantageously enables tailoring to tune the flow to the desired physiological rates.


Ab Externo Insertion of Stent via Small Puncture:



FIG. 45 illustrates the implantation of a stent 30t using an ab externo procedure having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. In the ab externo procedure of FIG. 45, the stent 30t is inserted into Schlemm's canal 21 with the aid of an applicator or delivery apparatus 100c that creates a small puncture into the eye 10 from outside.


Referring to FIG. 45, the stent 30t is housed in the applicator 100c, and pushed out of the applicator 100c once the applicator tip is in position within the trabecular meshwork 21. Since the tissue surrounding the trabecular meshwork 21 is optically opaque, an imaging technique, such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) or a laser imaging technique, is utilized. The imaging provides guidance for the insertion of the applicator tip and the deployment of the stent 30t. This technique can be used with a large variety of stent embodiments with slight modifications since the trabecular meshwork 21 is punctured from the scleral side rather than the anterior chamber side in the ab externo insertion.



FIG. 46 a glaucoma stent device 30u having features and advantages in accordance with a modified embodiment. This grommet-style stent 30u for ab externo insertion is a modification of the embodiment of FIG. 36A. In the embodiment of FIG. 46, the upper part or head 38u is tapered while the lower part or base 172 is flat, as opposed to the embodiment of FIG. 36A. The stent 30u is inserted from the outside of the eye 10 through a puncture in the sclera. Many of the other embodiments of stents taught or suggested herein can be modified for similar implantation.


This ultra-microscopic device 30u (FIG. 46) can be used with (1) a targeting Lasik-type laser, or with (2) contact on eyes or with (3) combined ultrasound microscope or (4) other device insertor handpiece.


Targeted Drug Delivery to the Trabecular Meshwork:



FIG. 47 illustrates a targeted drug delivery implant 30v having features and advantages in accordance with one embodiment. This drawing is a depiction of a targeted drug delivery concept. The slow release implant 30v is implanted within the trabecular meshwork 21.


A drug that is designed to target the trabecular meshwork 21 to increase its porosity, or improve the active transport across the endothelial layer of Schlemm's canal 22 can be stored in this small implant 30v (FIG. 47). Advantageously, slow release of the drug promotes the desired physiology at minimal dosage levels since the drug is released into the very structure that it is designed to modify.


While the components and techniques of the invention have been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is manifest that many changes may be made in the specific designs, constructions and methodology herein above described without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments set forth herein for purposes of exemplification, but is to be defined only by a fair reading of the appended claims, including the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled.

Claims
  • 1. A system for treating an ocular disorder in a patient, the system comprising: a delivery device, said delivery device comprising a handpiece and an elongate delivery member; anda plurality of glaucoma stents, each of the plurality of glaucoma stents comprising: a head portion comprising an inlet port;a base portion, the base portion comprising at least one port and a tapered portion;a waist portion attached to the head portion at a first end and to the base portion at a second end, the waist portion having an external diameter less than that of both an external diameter of a largest part of the base portion and an external diameter of a largest part of the head portion; anda lumen at least partially passing through the head portion, base portion, and the waist portion, the lumen in communication with the at least one port,wherein the external diameter of the largest part of the head portion is greater than the external diameter of the largest part of the base portion.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the external diameter of the largest part of the head portion is between 350 μm and 2500 μm.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the elongate delivery member extends through at least a portion of the lumen.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein each of the stents is composed of titanium.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein a surface material of each of the stents comprises heparin.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the handpiece of the delivery device further comprises an actuator configured to cause deployment of the plurality of stents from the delivery device.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the stents are preloaded on the elongate delivery member.
  • 8. A method of treating an ocular disorder in a patient, the method comprising: providing an anesthetic to an eye of the patient;forming a corneal incision in the eye of the patient;inserting an elongate delivery member of a delivery device through the corneal incision and advancing a distal tip of the elongate delivery member within an anterior chamber of the eye toward a desired implantation site,wherein the elongate delivery member comprises a plurality of glaucoma stents,wherein each of the plurality of glaucoma stents comprises a tapered base portion, an intermediate waist portion, and a head,wherein the tapered base portion comprises a plurality of outlet ports,wherein a minimum cross-sectional diameter of the head is greater than a maximum cross-sectional diameter of the tapered base portion; andcausing a tapered base portion of a first glaucoma stent of the plurality of glaucoma stents to be delivered through trabecular meshwork and into a Schlemm's canal of the eye with the head of the first glaucoma stent remaining in the anterior chamber, thereby facilitating flow of aqueous through the first glaucoma stent from the anterior chamber to the Schlemm's canal.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising withdrawing the delivery device from the eye.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein a depth of the waist portion is approximately equal to a thickness of the trabecular meshwork.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the minimum cross-sectional diameter of the head is the same as a maximum cross-sectional diameter of the head such that the diameter of the head is uniform.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the uniform diameter of the head is between 300 μm and 2750 μm.
  • 13. A method of treating an ocular disorder in a patient, the method comprising: inserting an elongate delivery member of a delivery device through an incision in an eye and advancing a distal tip of the elongate delivery member within an anterior chamber of the eye toward a desired implantation site,wherein the elongate delivery member comprises a plurality of stents,wherein each of the plurality of stents comprises a tapered base portion, an intermediate waist portion, and a head,wherein the tapered base portion comprises a plurality of outlet ports,wherein a minimum cross-sectional diameter of the head is greater than a maximum cross-sectional diameter of the tapered base portion; andcausing a tapered base portion of a first stent of the plurality of stents to be delivered through trabecular meshwork and into a Schlemm's canal of the eye with the head of the first stent remaining in the anterior chamber, thereby facilitating flow of aqueous through the first stent from the anterior chamber to the Schlemm's canal.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising withdrawing the delivery device from the eye.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein a depth of the waist portion is approximately equal to a thickness of the trabecular meshwork.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the minimum cross-sectional diameter of the head is the same as a maximum cross-sectional diameter of the head such that the diameter of the head is uniform.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the uniform diameter of the head is between 300 μm and 2750 μm.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/207,240 filed Mar. 12, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,517,759, titled GLAUCOMA STENT AND METHODS THEREOF FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT, which claims priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/794,832 filed Mar. 15, 2013, titled GLAUCOMA STENT AND METHODS THEREOF FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (732)
Number Name Date Kind
2031754 Mills Feb 1936 A
2127903 Bowen Aug 1938 A
3159161 Ness Dec 1964 A
3416530 Ness Dec 1968 A
3710795 Higuchi et al. Jan 1973 A
3717151 Collett Feb 1973 A
3788327 Donowitz et al. Jan 1974 A
3827700 Kaller Aug 1974 A
3863623 Trueblood et al. Feb 1975 A
3915172 Krejci et al. Oct 1975 A
3948271 Akiyama Apr 1976 A
3948871 Butterfield et al. Apr 1976 A
3961628 Arnold Jun 1976 A
4030480 Meyer Jun 1977 A
4037604 Newkirk Jul 1977 A
4043346 Mobley et al. Aug 1977 A
4093708 Zaffaroni et al. Jun 1978 A
4113088 Binkhorst Sep 1978 A
4168697 Cantekin Sep 1979 A
4175563 Arenberg et al. Nov 1979 A
4402681 Haas et al. Sep 1983 A
4428746 Mendez Jan 1984 A
4449974 Messingschlager May 1984 A
4450150 Sidman May 1984 A
4457757 Molteno Jul 1984 A
4468216 Muto Aug 1984 A
4501274 Skjaerpe Feb 1985 A
4554918 White Nov 1985 A
4604087 Joseph Aug 1986 A
4632842 Karwoski et al. Dec 1986 A
4634418 Binder Jan 1987 A
4692142 Dignam et al. Sep 1987 A
4718907 Karwoski et al. Jan 1988 A
4722724 Schocket Feb 1988 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4743248 Bartoo et al. May 1988 A
4750901 Molteno Jun 1988 A
4787885 Binder Nov 1988 A
4804382 Turina et al. Feb 1989 A
4820626 Williams et al. Apr 1989 A
4826478 Schocket May 1989 A
4828439 Giannuzi May 1989 A
4846172 Berlin Jul 1989 A
4853224 Wong Aug 1989 A
4886488 White Dec 1989 A
4936825 Ungerleider Jun 1990 A
4946436 Smith Aug 1990 A
4955881 Eckenhoff Sep 1990 A
4968296 Ritch et al. Nov 1990 A
4986810 Semrad Jan 1991 A
4997652 Wong Mar 1991 A
5005577 Frenekl Apr 1991 A
5017381 Maruyama et al. May 1991 A
5041081 Odrich Aug 1991 A
5073163 Lippman Dec 1991 A
5092837 Ritch et al. Mar 1992 A
5116327 Seder et al. May 1992 A
5127901 Odrich Jul 1992 A
5128145 Edgren et al. Jul 1992 A
5139502 Berg et al. Aug 1992 A
5164188 Wong Nov 1992 A
5171213 Price, Jr. Dec 1992 A
5178604 Baerveldt et al. Jan 1993 A
5180362 Worst Jan 1993 A
5207685 Cinberg et al. May 1993 A
5246451 Trescony et al. Sep 1993 A
5248231 Denham et al. Sep 1993 A
5300020 L'Esperance, Jr. Apr 1994 A
5318513 Leib et al. Jun 1994 A
5326345 Price, Jr. Jul 1994 A
5334137 Freeman Aug 1994 A
5338291 Speckman et al. Aug 1994 A
5342370 Simon et al. Aug 1994 A
5346464 Camras Sep 1994 A
5358492 Feibus Oct 1994 A
5360399 Stegmann Nov 1994 A
5370607 Memmen Dec 1994 A
5370641 O'Donnell, Jr. Dec 1994 A
5372577 Ungerleider Dec 1994 A
5378474 Morella et al. Jan 1995 A
5378475 Smith et al. Jan 1995 A
5380290 Makower et al. Jan 1995 A
5397300 Baerveldt et al. Mar 1995 A
5433701 Rubinstein Jul 1995 A
5443505 Wong et al. Aug 1995 A
5454796 Krupin Oct 1995 A
5476445 Baerveldt et al. Dec 1995 A
5486165 Stegmann Jan 1996 A
5520631 Nordquist et al. May 1996 A
5558629 Baerveldt et al. Sep 1996 A
5558630 Fisher Sep 1996 A
5562641 Flomenblit et al. Oct 1996 A
RE35390 Smith Dec 1996 E
5626558 Suson May 1997 A
5626559 Solomon May 1997 A
5629008 Lee May 1997 A
5639278 Dereume et al. Jun 1997 A
5643321 McDevitt Jul 1997 A
5651782 Simon et al. Jul 1997 A
5676679 Simon et al. Oct 1997 A
5681275 Ahmed Oct 1997 A
5702414 Richter et al. Dec 1997 A
5702419 Berry et al. Dec 1997 A
5704907 Nordquist et al. Jan 1998 A
5713844 Peyman Feb 1998 A
5722948 Gross Mar 1998 A
5723005 Herrick Mar 1998 A
5725529 Nicholson et al. Mar 1998 A
5741333 Frid Apr 1998 A
5743868 Brown et al. Apr 1998 A
5752928 de Roulhac et al. May 1998 A
5762625 Igaki Jun 1998 A
5766242 Wong et al. Jun 1998 A
5766243 Christensen et al. Jun 1998 A
5773019 Ashton et al. Jun 1998 A
5785674 Mateen Jul 1998 A
5800376 Vaskelis Sep 1998 A
5807302 Wandel Sep 1998 A
5810870 Myers et al. Sep 1998 A
5824071 Nelson et al. Oct 1998 A
5824072 Wong Oct 1998 A
5830171 Wallace Nov 1998 A
5865831 Cozean et al. Feb 1999 A
5868697 Richter et al. Feb 1999 A
5869079 Wong et al. Feb 1999 A
5879319 Pynson et al. Mar 1999 A
5882327 Jacob Mar 1999 A
5902598 Chen et al. May 1999 A
5908449 Bruchman et al. Jun 1999 A
5913852 Magram Jun 1999 A
5932299 Katoot Aug 1999 A
5980548 Evans Nov 1999 A
6007510 Nigam Dec 1999 A
6007511 Prywes Dec 1999 A
6033434 Borghi Mar 2000 A
6050970 Baeverldt Apr 2000 A
6077299 Adelberg et al. Jun 2000 A
6102045 Nordquist et al. Aug 2000 A
6142990 Burk Nov 2000 A
6146387 Trott et al. Nov 2000 A
6165210 Lau et al. Dec 2000 A
6168575 Soltanpour Jan 2001 B1
6174305 Mikus et al. Jan 2001 B1
6186974 Allan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6196993 Cohan et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203513 Yaron et al. Mar 2001 B1
6231597 Deem et al. May 2001 B1
6241721 Cozean et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261256 Ahmed Jul 2001 B1
6290684 Herrick Sep 2001 B1
6306114 Freeman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6328758 Tornier et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331313 Wong et al. Dec 2001 B1
6358222 Grundei Mar 2002 B1
6363938 Saadat et al. Apr 2002 B2
6375642 Grieshaber et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375972 Guo et al. Apr 2002 B1
6423001 Abreu Jul 2002 B1
6443893 Schnakenberg et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450984 Lynch et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464724 Lynch et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468283 Richter et al. Oct 2002 B1
6494857 Neuhann Dec 2002 B1
6508779 Suson Jan 2003 B1
6517483 Park et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524275 Lynch et al. Feb 2003 B1
6533768 Hill Mar 2003 B1
6544249 Yu et al. Apr 2003 B1
6582453 Tran et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585753 Eder et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589198 Soltanpour et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589203 Mitrev Jul 2003 B1
6595945 Brown Jul 2003 B2
6605053 Kamm et al. Aug 2003 B1
6623283 Torigian et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626858 Lynch et al. Sep 2003 B2
6638239 Bergheim et al. Oct 2003 B1
6666213 Svadovskiy Dec 2003 B2
6666841 Gharib et al. Dec 2003 B2
6682500 Soltanpour et al. Jan 2004 B2
6699211 Savage Mar 2004 B2
6712764 Jeffries et al. Mar 2004 B2
6726666 de Juan, Jr. Apr 2004 B2
6726676 Stegmann et al. Apr 2004 B2
D490152 Myall et al. May 2004 S
6730056 Ghaem et al. May 2004 B1
6736791 Tu et al. May 2004 B1
6764698 Byun et al. Jul 2004 B1
6780164 Bergheim et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783544 Lynch et al. Aug 2004 B2
6827699 Lynch et al. Dec 2004 B2
6827700 Lynch et al. Dec 2004 B2
6893413 Martin May 2005 B2
6939298 Brown et al. Sep 2005 B2
6939299 Petersen et al. Sep 2005 B1
6955656 Bergheim et al. Oct 2005 B2
6962573 Wilcox Nov 2005 B1
6966888 Cullen et al. Nov 2005 B2
6981958 Gharib et al. Jan 2006 B1
6998137 Shih et al. Feb 2006 B2
7094225 Tu et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101402 Phelps et al. Sep 2006 B2
7101567 Sano et al. Sep 2006 B1
7135009 Tu et al. Nov 2006 B2
7144616 Unger et al. Dec 2006 B1
7163543 Smedley et al. Jan 2007 B2
7186232 Smedley et al. Mar 2007 B1
7192412 Zhou et al. Mar 2007 B1
7192484 Chappa et al. Mar 2007 B2
7220238 Lynch et al. May 2007 B2
7252006 Tai et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273475 Tu et al. Sep 2007 B2
7294115 Wilk Nov 2007 B1
7297130 Bergheim et al. Nov 2007 B2
7331984 Tu et al. Feb 2008 B2
7364564 Sniegowski et al. Apr 2008 B2
7431710 Tu et al. Oct 2008 B2
7445793 Niwa et al. Nov 2008 B2
7488303 Haffner et al. Feb 2009 B1
RE40722 Chappa Jun 2009 E
7563241 Tu et al. Jul 2009 B2
7641627 Camras et al. Jan 2010 B2
7678065 Haffner et al. Mar 2010 B2
7695135 Rosenthal Apr 2010 B1
7708711 Tu et al. May 2010 B2
7776024 Santini et al. Aug 2010 B2
7811268 Maldon Ado Bas Oct 2010 B2
7815592 Coroneo Oct 2010 B2
7850637 Lynch et al. Dec 2010 B2
7857782 Tu et al. Dec 2010 B2
7862531 Yaron et al. Jan 2011 B2
7867186 Haffner et al. Jan 2011 B2
7867205 Bergheim et al. Jan 2011 B2
7879001 Haffner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7879079 Tu et al. Feb 2011 B2
7951155 Smedley et al. May 2011 B2
7997460 Badawi et al. Aug 2011 B2
8007459 Haffner et al. Aug 2011 B2
D645489 Gille et al. Sep 2011 S
D645490 Gille et al. Sep 2011 S
8034016 Yaron et al. Oct 2011 B2
8034105 Stegmann et al. Oct 2011 B2
8062244 Tu et al. Nov 2011 B2
8070290 Gille et al. Dec 2011 B2
8075511 Tu et al. Dec 2011 B2
8118768 Tu et al. Feb 2012 B2
8142364 Haffner et al. Mar 2012 B2
8152752 Lynch et al. Apr 2012 B2
8267882 Euteneuer et al. Sep 2012 B2
8267995 Castillejos Sep 2012 B2
8273050 Bergheim et al. Sep 2012 B2
8333742 Bergheim et al. Dec 2012 B2
8337445 Tu et al. Dec 2012 B2
8348877 Tu et al. Jan 2013 B2
8388568 Lynch et al. Mar 2013 B2
8404269 Snyder et al. Mar 2013 B2
8414518 Schieber et al. Apr 2013 B2
8419673 Rickard Apr 2013 B2
8425449 Wardle et al. Apr 2013 B2
8439972 Badawi et al. May 2013 B2
8444589 Silvestrini May 2013 B2
8454582 Dejuan et al. Jun 2013 B2
8475374 Irazoqui et al. Jul 2013 B2
8506515 Burns et al. Aug 2013 B2
8545431 Rickard Oct 2013 B2
8579846 Tu et al. Nov 2013 B2
8579848 Field et al. Nov 2013 B2
8585631 Dacquay Nov 2013 B2
8585664 Dos Santos et al. Nov 2013 B2
8603024 Bohm et al. Dec 2013 B2
8617094 Smedley et al. Dec 2013 B2
8656958 Unger et al. Feb 2014 B2
8657776 Wardle et al. Feb 2014 B2
8721580 Rickard et al. May 2014 B2
8753305 Field et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771217 Lynch et al. Jul 2014 B2
8771220 Nissan Jul 2014 B2
8801648 Bergheim et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808219 Bergheim et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808222 Schieber et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808224 Rickard Aug 2014 B2
8814820 Bergheim et al. Aug 2014 B2
8840578 Dos Santos et al. Sep 2014 B2
8864701 Dos Santos et al. Oct 2014 B2
8882781 Smedley et al. Nov 2014 B2
8956320 Ovchinnikov et al. Feb 2015 B2
8986240 Dos Santos et al. Mar 2015 B2
8998838 Yalamanchili Apr 2015 B2
9022967 Oliver et al. May 2015 B2
9066782 Tu et al. Jun 2015 B2
9072588 Bohm et al. Jul 2015 B2
9125721 Field Sep 2015 B2
9132034 Dos Santos Sep 2015 B2
9155653 Field Oct 2015 B2
9155654 Tu et al. Oct 2015 B2
9173775 Haffner et al. Nov 2015 B2
9220632 Smedley et al. Dec 2015 B2
9226851 Gunn Jan 2016 B2
9283115 Lind et al. Mar 2016 B2
9289324 Johnson et al. Mar 2016 B2
9301875 Tu et al. Apr 2016 B2
9492320 Lynch et al. Nov 2016 B2
9554940 Haffner et al. Jan 2017 B2
9561131 Tu et al. Feb 2017 B2
9572963 Tu et al. Feb 2017 B2
9592151 Rangel-Friedman et al. Mar 2017 B2
9597230 Haffner et al. Mar 2017 B2
9603738 Haffner et al. Mar 2017 B2
9603741 Berlin Mar 2017 B2
9636255 Haffner et al. May 2017 B2
9668915 Haffner et al. Jun 2017 B2
9730638 Haffner et al. Aug 2017 B2
9789001 Tu et al. Oct 2017 B2
9827143 Lynch Nov 2017 B2
9833357 Berlin Dec 2017 B2
9962290 Burns et al. May 2018 B2
9987472 Tu et al. Jun 2018 B2
9993368 Bergheim et al. Jun 2018 B2
D833008 Kalina, Jr. et al. Nov 2018 S
10159601 Berlin Dec 2018 B2
10183551 Rangel-Friedman et al. Jan 2019 B2
10206813 Haffner et al. Feb 2019 B2
D846738 Kalina, Jr. et al. Apr 2019 S
10245178 Heitzmann et al. Apr 2019 B1
10271989 Haffner et al. Apr 2019 B2
10285853 Rangel-Friedman et al. May 2019 B2
10285856 Tu et al. May 2019 B2
10406029 Tu et al. Sep 2019 B2
10485701 Haffner et al. Nov 2019 B2
10485702 Bergheim et al. Nov 2019 B2
10492950 Lynch et al. Dec 2019 B2
10499809 Kalina, Jr. et al. Dec 2019 B2
10517759 Grimaldi Dec 2019 B2
10568762 Lynch et al. Feb 2020 B2
D886997 Kalina, Jr. et al. Jun 2020 S
10674906 Kalina, Jr. et al. Jun 2020 B2
10813789 Haffner et al. Oct 2020 B2
D901683 Kalina, Jr. et al. Nov 2020 S
10828195 Burns et al. Nov 2020 B2
10828473 Haffner et al. Nov 2020 B2
10959941 Haffner Mar 2021 B2
11019996 Kalina, Jr. et al. Jun 2021 B2
11019997 Kalina, Jr. et al. Jun 2021 B2
11116625 Kalina, Jr. Sep 2021 B2
D938585 Kalina, Jr. et al. Dec 2021 S
11197780 Haffner et al. Dec 2021 B2
11253394 Haffner et al. Feb 2022 B2
11426306 Haffner et al. Mar 2022 B2
11318043 Heitzrnann et al. May 2022 B2
11376040 Kalina, Jr. et al. Jul 2022 B2
20010000527 Yaron et al. Apr 2001 A1
20010053873 Schaaf et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020013546 Grieshaber et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013572 Berlin Jan 2002 A1
20020026200 Savage Feb 2002 A1
20020052640 Bigus et al. May 2002 A1
20020082591 Haefliger Jun 2002 A1
20020087111 Ethier et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099434 Buscemi et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020102307 Guo et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020133168 Smedley et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143284 Tu et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156413 Williams et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169468 Brown Nov 2002 A1
20020177856 Richter et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188308 Tu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020193725 Odrich Dec 2002 A1
20030019833 Unger et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030055372 Lynch et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060752 Bergheim et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030079329 Yaron et al. May 2003 A1
20030083646 Sirhan et al. May 2003 A1
20030088260 Smedley et al. May 2003 A1
20030097151 Smedley et al. May 2003 A1
20030135149 Cullen et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139729 Stegmann et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030153863 Patel Aug 2003 A1
20030176854 Rodstrom Sep 2003 A1
20030181848 Bergheim et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187384 Bergheim et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208163 Yaron et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212383 Cote et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229303 Haffner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236483 Ren Dec 2003 A1
20030236484 Lynch et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040024345 Gharib et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040059248 Messner et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040076676 Tojo et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040076868 Tojo et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088048 Richter et al. May 2004 A1
20040092856 Dahan May 2004 A1
20040102729 Haffner et al. May 2004 A1
20040111050 Smedley et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111080 Harper et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040115268 Ashton et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127843 Tu et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147870 Burns et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040154946 Solovay et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040162545 Brown et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040176341 Chou et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040180075 Robinson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193095 Shadduck Sep 2004 A1
20040193262 Shadduck Sep 2004 A1
20040210181 Vass et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210185 Tu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215126 Ahmed Oct 2004 A1
20040216749 Tu Nov 2004 A1
20040225250 Yablonski Nov 2004 A1
20040254519 Tu et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254520 Porteous et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254521 Simon Dec 2004 A1
20040260227 Lisk, Jr. et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260228 Lynch et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050008673 Snyder et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038498 Dubrow et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049578 Tu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055075 Pinchuk et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050107734 Coroneo May 2005 A1
20050119601 Lynch et al. Jun 2005 A9
20050119737 Bene et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125003 Pinchuk et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137538 Kunzler et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050159660 Montegrande et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171507 Christian et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175708 Carrasquillo et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182350 Nigam Aug 2005 A1
20050184004 Rodgers et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186279 Guo et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192527 Gharib et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209549 Bergheim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050232972 Odrich Oct 2005 A1
20050240143 Dohlman Oct 2005 A1
20050244461 Nivaggioli et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050244467 Nivaggioli et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050244477 Hughes et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250788 Tu et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261624 Wilcox Nov 2005 A1
20050267397 Bhalla Dec 2005 A1
20050267398 Protopsaltis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273033 Grahn et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050276841 Davis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277864 Haffner et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050281861 Hughes et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288619 Savage Dec 2005 A1
20060009498 Whitcup Jan 2006 A1
20060020253 Prescott Jan 2006 A1
20060032507 Tu Feb 2006 A1
20060036207 Koonmen et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060067978 Heiler et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069340 Simon Mar 2006 A1
20060074375 Bergheim et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079828 Brown Apr 2006 A1
20060083772 DeWitt et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060084907 Bergheim et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060116626 Smedley et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129129 Smith Jun 2006 A1
20060155300 Stamper et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173397 Tu et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195055 Bergheim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195056 Bergheim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200113 Haffner et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060210604 Dadey et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235367 Takashima et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241749 Tu et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060246112 Snyder et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257450 Mudumba et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257451 Varner et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060276738 Becker Dec 2006 A1
20060276739 Brown Dec 2006 A1
20060292222 Jonasse Dec 2006 A1
20070004998 Rodgers et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031472 Huang et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070032734 Najafi et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070059336 Hughes et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073390 Lee Mar 2007 A1
20070078371 Brown et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088014 Edelman et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088432 Solovay et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093740 Shetty Apr 2007 A1
20070106199 Krivoy et al. May 2007 A1
20070106200 Levy May 2007 A1
20070112263 Fink et al. May 2007 A1
20070118065 Pinchuk et al. May 2007 A1
20070118066 Pinchuk et al. May 2007 A1
20070123767 Montegrande et al. May 2007 A1
20070123812 Pinchuk et al. May 2007 A1
20070129623 Fleischman et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070154621 Raad Jul 2007 A1
20070156079 Brown Jul 2007 A1
20070179426 Selden Aug 2007 A1
20070185468 Prywes Aug 2007 A1
20070191863 De Juan, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070207186 Scanlon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212386 Patravale et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212387 Patravale et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212388 Patravale et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212393 Patravale et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212395 Donello et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219632 Castillejos Sep 2007 A1
20070233037 Gifford, III et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070260201 Prausnitz et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276315 Haffner Nov 2007 A1
20070276316 Haffner Nov 2007 A1
20070282244 Tu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070282245 Tu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070292470 Thornton Dec 2007 A1
20070292474 Hsu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070293807 Lynch et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070293872 Peyman Dec 2007 A1
20070298068 Badawi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298073 Whitcup et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298074 Robinson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080027304 Pardo et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080038316 Wong et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039931 Jelle et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045878 Bergheim et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080057101 Roorda Mar 2008 A1
20080057102 Roorda Mar 2008 A1
20080057103 Roorda Mar 2008 A1
20080058704 Hee et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081064 Jelle et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080082078 Berlin Apr 2008 A1
20080107694 Trogden et al. May 2008 A1
20080108932 Rodgers May 2008 A1
20080108934 Berlin May 2008 A1
20080112923 Hughes et al. May 2008 A1
20080125691 Yaron et al. May 2008 A1
20080131484 Robinson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147021 Jani Jun 2008 A1
20080147168 Ransbury et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080152694 Lobl et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161741 Bene et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161907 Chen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177153 Bachman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080200860 Tu et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080210322 Unger et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221501 Cote et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228127 Burns et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080236669 Unger et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243243 Williams et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243247 Poley et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080277007 Unger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080289710 Unger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080292679 Lyons et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080306429 Shields et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090036768 Seehusen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090036818 Grahn et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090043321 Conston et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090069648 Irazoqui et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076436 Gharib et al. Mar 2009 A2
20090082321 Edelman et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082860 Schieber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082862 Schieber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082863 Schieber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090104248 Rapacki et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118702 Lazar May 2009 A1
20090123515 Taylor et al. May 2009 A1
20090132040 Frion et al. May 2009 A1
20090137992 Mallakrishnan May 2009 A1
20090138081 Bergheim et al. May 2009 A1
20090148498 Libin et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090149947 Frohwitter Jun 2009 A1
20090151422 Unger et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155338 Conway et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177138 Brown et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204053 Nissan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090214619 Reiff et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090220572 Deschatelets et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090227933 Karageozian Sep 2009 A1
20090227934 Eutenever et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090264861 Jain et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090275924 Lattanzio et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090280158 Butuner Nov 2009 A1
20090287136 Castillejos Nov 2009 A1
20090326432 Schmidt et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004635 Lin et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100015195 Jain et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100025613 Tai et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042209 Guarnieri Feb 2010 A1
20100056977 Wandel Mar 2010 A1
20100056979 Smedley et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057055 Camras et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100087774 Haffner et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106073 Haffner et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100114006 Baerveldt May 2010 A1
20100121342 Schieber et al. May 2010 A1
20100125237 Schocket May 2010 A1
20100145180 Abreu Jun 2010 A1
20100158980 Kopczynski et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168644 Brown Jul 2010 A1
20100175767 Unger et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185138 Yaron et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191103 Stamper et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191329 Badawi et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100222733 Schieber et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100225061 Bath Sep 2010 A1
20100234791 Lynch et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241046 Pinchuk et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249691 Van der Mooren et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100255061 de Juan, Jr. et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274259 Yaron et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100278898 Hughes et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110009874 Wardle et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110009958 Wardle et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110046536 Stegmann et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110046728 Shareef et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110054418 Pugh et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066098 Stergiopulos Mar 2011 A1
20110071454 Dos Santos et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071456 Rickard Mar 2011 A1
20110071458 Rickard Mar 2011 A1
20110071459 Rickard et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071505 Rickard et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110086095 Jacob et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110092878 Tu et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098627 Wilcox Apr 2011 A1
20110098640 Horne et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098809 Wardle et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110105987 Bergheim et al. May 2011 A1
20110106006 Martin et al. May 2011 A1
20110112475 Benson May 2011 A1
20110118649 Stegmann et al. May 2011 A1
20110118835 Silvestrini et al. May 2011 A1
20110130831 Badawi et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144559 Lafdi et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110196487 Badawi et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110224597 Stegmann et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110244014 Williams et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110245753 Williams et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110248671 Dos Santos et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110251568 Beeley et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257623 Marshall et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110319806 Wardle Dec 2011 A1
20120010702 Stegmann et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120022424 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120035524 Silvestrini Feb 2012 A1
20120035528 Coppeta et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059338 Beeley et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120059461 Badawi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071809 Tu et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120078158 Haffner et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120078362 Haffner et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120089072 Cunningham, Jr. Apr 2012 A1
20120089073 Cunningham, Jr. Apr 2012 A1
20120109040 Smedley et al. May 2012 A1
20120130467 Selden et al. May 2012 A1
20120165933 Haffner et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179087 Schieber et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120184892 Bigler et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120197217 Coldren Aug 2012 A1
20120203160 Kahook et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120238994 Nazzaro et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120257167 Gille et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120259195 Haffner et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120289883 Meng et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120302861 Marshall et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120310072 Grieshaber Dec 2012 A1
20120323159 McDonnell et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130006164 Yaron et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130006165 Eutenener et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130018295 Haffner et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130018296 Bergheim et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130079701 Schieber et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130090534 Burns et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130102949 Baerveldt Apr 2013 A1
20130144202 Field et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150770 Horvath et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150773 Nissan et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150774 Field et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150776 Bohm et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150777 Bohm et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150779 Field Jun 2013 A1
20130150959 Schieber et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158381 Rickard Jun 2013 A1
20130158462 Wardle et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165840 Orge Jun 2013 A1
20130172804 Schieber et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130184631 Pinchuk Jul 2013 A1
20130245532 Tu et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253404 Tu Sep 2013 A1
20130253405 Tu Sep 2013 A1
20130253528 Haffner et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130281910 Tu et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130310930 Tu et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140034607 Meng et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140046437 Renke Feb 2014 A1
20140052046 Peartree et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140135916 Clauson et al. May 2014 A1
20140276332 Crimaldi et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150148730 Lynch et al. May 2015 A1
20150223981 Smedley et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150342875 Haffner Dec 2015 A1
20150374546 Hill Dec 2015 A1
20160354309 Heitzmann et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170135857 Haffner et al. May 2017 A1
20170156848 Schieber Jun 2017 A1
20170273829 Tu et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180021170 Haffner et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180028361 Haffner et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180036172 Haffner et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180085065 Haffner et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180104102 Lynch et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180161205 Tu et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180280194 Heitzmann et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180303665 Heitzmann et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180325732 Burns et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180333296 Heitzmann et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180369017 Schieber et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190000673 Fjield et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190021991 Heitzmann et al. Jan 2019 A9
20190053704 Burns et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190083307 Burns et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190083313 Berlin Mar 2019 A1
20190104936 Gunn et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190105077 Kalina, Jr. et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190125581 Heitzmann et al. May 2019 A1
20190224046 Heitzmann et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190314199 Haffner et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190321220 Rangel-Friedman et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190321225 Smedley et al. Oct 2019 A1
20200155349 Haffner et al. May 2020 A1
20200367745 Kalina, Jr. et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210015662 Haffner et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210137737 Burns et al. May 2021 A1
20210154449 Haffner et al. May 2021 A1
20210298948 Haffner et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210315806 Haffner Oct 2021 A1
20210369447 Kalina, Jr. Dec 2021 A1
20220000663 Haffner et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220015628 Kalina, Jr. et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220233349 Haffner et al. Jul 2022 A1
20220233354 Haffner et al. Jul 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (129)
Number Date Country
199876197 Feb 1999 AU
200072059 Jul 2001 AU
2004264913 Dec 2011 AU
2009251058 Dec 2013 AU
2273331 Jun 1998 CA
2244646 Feb 1999 CA
2311244 Jun 1999 CA
2442652 Jan 2011 CA
2766131 Jan 2011 CA
2683224 Dec 2014 CA
2830555 Apr 2015 CA
2762536 Nov 2020 CA
92111244 Jul 1993 CH
101396335 Apr 2009 CN
19840047 Mar 2000 DE
10127666 Jan 2003 DE
0550791 Jul 1993 EP
0858788 Aug 1998 EP
0898947 Mar 1999 EP
1114627 Jul 2001 EP
1592407 Nov 2005 EP
1977724 Oct 2008 EP
2260803 Dec 2010 EP
2260804 Dec 2010 EP
2263621 Dec 2010 EP
2351589 Aug 2011 EP
2982354 Feb 2016 EP
2985012 Feb 2016 EP
2553658 Apr 1985 FR
2710269 Mar 1995 FR
9311476 Mar 1995 FR
2721499 Dec 1995 FR
2757068 Jun 1998 FR
2296663 Jul 1996 GB
2005-502811 May 1993 JP
2010-248869 Sep 1998 JP
2011-123205 May 1999 JP
2001-523519 Nov 2001 JP
2002-541977 Dec 2002 JP
2001-507969 Jan 2003 JP
2004-518450 Jun 2004 JP
3703721 Jul 2005 JP
2005-525835 Sep 2005 JP
2007-535386 Dec 2007 JP
2008-500878 Jan 2008 JP
4031836 Jan 2008 JP
2009-523540 Jun 2009 JP
2009-542370 Dec 2009 JP
2010-533565 Oct 2010 JP
4688444 Feb 2011 JP
2011-520805 Jul 2011 JP
2011-522575 Aug 2011 JP
2012-516224 Jul 2012 JP
2012-198134 Sep 2012 JP
2013-063308 Apr 2013 JP
5255402 Apr 2013 JP
5323011 Jul 2013 JP
2013-208434 Oct 2013 JP
5502811 May 2014 JP
2014-193366 Oct 2014 JP
2014-240022 Dec 2014 JP
2022539 Nov 1994 RU
2143250 Dec 1999 RU
WO 8900869 Feb 1989 WO
WO 9108784 Jun 1991 WO
WO 9118568 Dec 1991 WO
WO 9200112 Jan 1992 WO
WO 9219294 Nov 1992 WO
WO 9413234 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9508310 Mar 1995 WO
WO 1996020742 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9636377 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9823237 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9830181 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9835639 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9837831 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9926567 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9930641 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9938470 Aug 1999 WO
WO 199956637 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0013627 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0064390 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0064391 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0064393 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0067687 Nov 2000 WO
WO 200064389 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0072788 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0141685 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0150943 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0178631 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0178656 Oct 2001 WO
WO 2001080825 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0197727 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0236052 May 2002 WO
WO 2002053129 Jul 2002 WO
WO 02074052 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02080811 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02102274 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03015659 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03041622 May 2003 WO
WO 03045290 Jun 2003 WO
WO 2003061625 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03073968 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004043435 May 2004 WO
WO 2004073552 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004093761 Nov 2004 WO
WO 05046782 May 2005 WO
WO 05055873 Jun 2005 WO
WO 05107664 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2007087061 Aug 2007 WO
WO 2008005873 Jan 2008 WO
WO 08061043 May 2008 WO
WO 2008060359 May 2008 WO
WO 2008083118 Jul 2008 WO
WO 2008157614 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009012406 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009035571 Mar 2009 WO
WO 2009063222 May 2009 WO
WO 2009126569 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009151543 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2010006053 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010078063 Jul 2010 WO
WO 10135369 Nov 2010 WO
WO 11020633 Feb 2011 WO
WO 2011127064 Oct 2011 WO
WO 12071476 May 2012 WO
WO 13148275 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2017030917 Feb 2017 WO
WO 2019036025 Feb 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (63)
Entry
Johnson et al., “Schlemm's Canal Becomes Smaller After Successful Filtration Surgery”, (reprinted) ARCM Ophthalmol/vol. 118, Sep. 2000 (www.archophthalmol.com) p. 1251-1256.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2016/053570 dated Mar. 27, 2018.
Alexander, L., et al., Disistronic Polioviruses as Expression Vectors for Foreign Genes. 1994. Aids Research and Human Retroviruses. vol. 10, Supplement 2, S57-S60.
Bae, et al., “In vitro experiment of the pressure regulating valve for a glaucoma implant”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 13.5, 13:613-619, No. 5, Sep. 2003.
Bucciarelli, Patrice D., Working Model is Next Step in Team's Long Journey to Commercial Product, Healthfirst, Business First of Louisville, louisville.bizjournals.com, Feb. 27, 2004.
“Changing Perspectives in Glaucoma Management,” Innovations in Glaucoma 2010.
Cairns, J.E., “Trabeculectomy: Preliminary report of a new method”, Am. J. Ophthalmology, 66:673-79 (1968).
Chen, et al., “Trabeculetomy combined with implantation of silicon rubber slice for intractable glaucoma”, Eye Science, 18:95-98, vol. 2, Jun. 2002.
Fine, Ben S., et al., “A Clinicopathologic Study of Four Cases of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Compared to Normal Eyes”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, No. 1, 1981, pp. 88-105.
Fiore, P.M., et al., Use of neodymium: YAG laser to open an occluded molteno tube, Ophthalmic Surgery, May 1989; 20(5): 373-74.
Gimbel, H.V., et al., “Small incision trabeculotomy combined with phacoemulsificatin and intraocular lens implantation”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 19:92-96 (Jan. 1993).
Gothwal, et al., “Migration of seton into the anterior chamber”, Eye, 16:85-97, 2002.
Hoskins, H. Dunbar, et al., Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas, Chapter 4: Aqueous Humor Outflow, 61 edition, pp. 41-66 (1989) (28 pages).
Huang, Morgan C., et al., Intermediate-term Clinical Experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant, 127 Am. J. Ophthalmol. 27 (Jan. 1999).
Jordon, et al., “A Novel Approach to Suprachoroidal Drainage for the Surgical Treatment of Intractable Glaucoma,” J Glaucoma 15(3): 200-205 (2006).
Kampik, Anselm Franz Grehn, Nutzen und Risiken Augenärzticher Therapie, Hauotreferate der XXXIII, Essener Fortbildung für Augenärzte, Dec. 1998. (English translated version enclosed Benefits and Risks of Opthalmological Therapy).
Kershner, Robert, “Nonpenetrating trabulectomy with placement of a collagen drainage device”, J. Cataract Refract. Sug., 21:608-611 (1995).
Klemm, A. Balazs, J. Draeger, R. Wiezorrek, Experimental use of space-retaining substances with extended duration: functional and morphological results, Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (1995) 233:592-597.
Krupin, Theodore, et al., Filtering valve implant surgery for eyes with neovascular glaucoma, 89 Am. J. Ophthalmol. 338 (Mar. 1980).
Mermoud, A., et al., “Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma”, J. Cataracat Refract. Surg., vol. 25, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 323-331 (abstract only).
Miyazaki, Akiko, et al., Postoperative Results Of Combined Trabeculotomy, Phacoemulsification And Intraocular Lens Implantation With Self-Sealing Wound, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery, 1997, pp. 537-542, vol. 10, No. 4.
Molteno, A.C.B., et al., Implants for draining neovascular glaucoma, 61 Br. J. Ophthalmol. 120 (1977).
Moses, Robert A., M.D.; Circumferential Flow in Schlemm's Canal; American Journal of Ophthalmology, Sep. 1979, vol. 88, No. 3, Part II, :pp. 585-591.
Nguyen, Quang H., et al., Complications of Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implants, 116 Arch. Ophthalmol. 571 (May 1998).
Refojo, “Current status of biomaterials in ophthalmology”, Survey of ophthalmology, 26:257-265, No. 5, 1982.
Rizq, et al., Intraocular Pressure Measurement at the Choroid Surface: A Feasibility Study with Implications for Implantable Microsystems, Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85:868-871, Jul. 2001.
Saxena, Sandeep. “Clinical Ophthalmology”. 2011. pp. 245.
Schocket, Investigations of the Reasons for Success and Failure in the Anterior Shunt-to-the Encircling-Band Procedure in the Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma, Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc., 84:743 (1986).
Scott, et al., “Use of glaucoma drainage devices in the management of glaucoma associated with aniridia”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, 135:155-159, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2003.
Shields, M. Bruce, MD, A Study Guide for Glaucoma: Aqueous Humor Dynamics, Copyright 1982, pp. 6-43.
Stefansson, J., “An Operation for Glaucoma”, American J. Ophthalmology, 8:681-693 (1925).
“Transcend Medical CyPass® System—Instructions for Use,” (Release date Apr. 29, 2013).
Tham, et al., “Incisional surgery for angle closure glaucoma”, Seminars in Ophthalmology, 17:92-99, No. 2, Jun. 2002.
Topouzis, Fotis, et al., Follow-up of the Original Cohort With the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant, 128 Am. J. Ophthalmol. 198 (Aug. 1999).
Tripathi, et al., Functional Anatomy of the Anterior Chamber Angle, Biomedical Foundation of Ophthalmology, vol. 1, Chapter 10,pp. 1-74; edited by Thomas Dune and Edward Jaeger, Revised Edition, 1983,—Harper & Row, Publishers.
Tun, et al., Assessment of Trabecular Meshwork Width Using Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography, 251:6 Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1587 (2013).
Wagner, Justin A., Edwards, Aurélie, and Schuman, Joel S., Characterization of Uveoscleral Outflow in Enucleated Porcine Eyes Perfused Under Constant Pressure, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Sep. 2004; 45(9): 3203-3206 (9 pages).
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language (Unabridged), definitions of “deploy” and “deployment”, p. 605 (2002) (4 pages).
Wilcox, Michael J. et al. “Hypothesis for Improving Accessory Filtration by Using Geometry”, J. Glaucoma, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 244-247 (1994).
Wilcox, Michael J. et al. “Performance of a New, Low-volume, High-Surface Area Aqueous Shunt in Normal Rabbit Eyes”, J. Glaucoma, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 74-82 (Feb. 2000).
Wilson, Ellen D., “Implants offer choices for glaucoma surgeons”, EW Glaucoma, Oct. 11, 1999, website “http://www.eyeorld.org/sep99/999p60.asp”.
Wilcox et al., Latest Research: Tear Biomarkers, Jun. 29, 2011, 5 pages.
Yan, et al., “Schlemm's Canal and Trabecular Meshwork in Eyes with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Comparative Study Using High-Frequency”, PLOS One, 15 pages, Jan. 4, 2016.
European Exam Report, EPO App. No. 08 102 896.1, dated Nov. 4, 2010.
Communication from European Patent Office for European App. No. 08102896.1 (dated Jul. 2, 2012).
Appeal in European Application No. 08102896.1 dated Aug. 27, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/053570 dated Mar. 9, 2017.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2016/053570 dated Jan. 23, 2018.
Chen et al., “Implantable Unpowered Parylene MEMS Intraocular Pressure Sensor”, Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, 2006 International Conference on Publication Date: May 9-12, 2006, 5pp., downloaded from http://ieeezxplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4281361.
Grant, W.M., MD, “Further Studies on Facility of Flow Through the Trabecular Meshwork”, AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, Oct. 1958, vol. 60, pp. 523-533.
https://entokey.com/gonioscopy-2/ Uploaded Oct. 2016.
Hulzen et al., “Effect of Fixation on Juxtacanalicular Tissue and Schlemm's canal”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 37, No. 1 (Jan. 1996).
Jain et al., “Development of polyvinyl alcohol-gelatin membranes for antibiotic delivery in the eye”, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 2011, Informa Healthcare USA, Inc., 12 pages.
Johnson, et al. “Mechanisms and Routes of Aqueous Humor Drainage” in D.M. Albert, & F.A. Jakobiec (Eds.), Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology, pp. 2577-2595, WB Saunders, Philadelphia (2000).
Katuri et al., “Intraocular Pressure Monitoring Sensors”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 8, No. 1, Jan. 2008, 8 pp.
McLaren et al., “Continuous Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Rabbits by Telemetry,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 966-975, May 1996.
Online encyclopedia article “Hyaluronan,” section on “Medical Applications” accessed Monday, Sep. 27, 2010. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyaluronic_acid.
Sampaolesi, et al., “Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Trabecular Meshwork in Normal-Glaucomatous Eyes”, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, pp. 302-314 (1977).
Spiegel, Detlev, “Benefits and Risks of Ophthalmological Treatment” Bucherei des Augenarztes I The Ophthalmologist's Library, vol. 139, Oct. 15, 1998.
Spiegel, “7 chirurgische Glaukomtherapie”, pp. 79-88 (English translation enclosed).
Spiegel et al., “Schlemm's Canal Implant: A New Method to Lower Intraocular Pressure in Patients With POAG”, Opthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 30(6):492-494 (1999).
Ianchulev et al., “Minimally Invasive Ab-Interno Suprachoroidal Device (CyPass) for IOP Control in Open-Angle Glaucoma,” presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Oct. 16-19, 2010, Chicago, IL.
Walter et al., “Development of a Completely Encapsulated Intraocular Pressure Sensor”, Ophthalmic Res 2000; 32:278-284. Nov. 1999.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200179171 A1 Jun 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61794832 Mar 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14207240 Mar 2014 US
Child 16717957 US