This invention relates to a gliding board, such as a snowboard, wakeboard, or other similar device for gliding on a surface.
Snowboards having areas with different bending characteristics along the length of the board are generally known, e.g., from U.S. Pat. No. 6,499,758; U.S. Patent Publication 2004/0084878 and U.S. Patent Publication 2007/0170694. These board designs tend to stiffen the board in areas under the rider's feet as compared to adjacent areas fore and aft of the binding mounting region. For example, as can be seen in FIGS. 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent Publication 2004/0084878 and FIGS. 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent Publication 2007/0170694, the thickness of the board is greater in the binding mounting regions (reference numbers 10 and 12 for U.S. Patent
Publication 2004/0084878, and reference numbers 16 and 18 U.S. Patent Publication 2007/0170694). Similarly, U.S. Patent 6,499,758 has increased structural strength in the board at areas under the rider's feet. See col. 5, lines 51-57 and FIGS. 1 and 16, for example.
In accordance with at least some embodiments of the invention, the inventors have unexpectedly found that arranging the board to more easily bend in portions within one or both binding mounting regions as compared to portions at or near ends of the binding mounting regions provides increased ability for the board to store and release energy when performing certain maneuvers, such as nose presses, ollies and similar moves. In one embodiment, the board may be arranged to bend more easily within a binding mounting region as compared to at least portion of the board between the binding mounting region and the nose or tail of the board and/or a portion between the binding mounting regions. For example, the board may include forward and rear binding mounting regions with the forward binding mounting region being located nearer a nose of the board than the rear binding mounting region. A portion of the board between the forward binding mounting region and the nose may be arranged to be stiffer, and thus more difficult to bend, than a portion of the board within the forward binding mounting region, as well as be stiffer than a portion between the forward and rear binding mounting regions. As a result, if the rider performs a nose press or similar move that tends to put a bending force on the board (such that the board bends about an axis transverse to a longitudinal axis of the board), the board will tend to bend more (e.g., along a longer arc and/or with a smaller radius of curvature) in portions under the rider's front foot and/or between the front foot and the tail as compared to portions of the board between the front foot and the nose. The board may be similarly configured near the rear binding mounting region, e.g., so a portion of the board between the rear binding mounting region and the tail may be arranged to be stiffer, and thus more difficult to bend, than a portion of the board within the rear binding mounting region. This type of arrangement is in contrast to boards that have thicker or otherwise increased structural strength under the rider's feet. Increased strength under the rider's feet tends to move areas of increased board flex away from the feet, reducing the rider's ability to store useful energy in the board for nose presses, ollies and similar moves.
In one embodiment, a board may be made to have a greater thickness in portions of the board between the forward binding mounting zone and the nose and/or between the rear binding mounting zone and the tail as compared to portions within the binding mounting zones. This is in contrast to typical board arrangements where a thickness of the board at the binding mounting regions is equal to or more than a thickness of the board between each binding mounting region and the nose or tail, respectively. In one embodiment, the thickness variations may be achieved by adjusting the thickness of a core of the board (e.g., the thickness of the core, which may be made of wood, foam or other, may be made less in the binding mounting regions than at other areas adjacent the binding mounting regions). This arrangement of the core thickness may be useful for boards that are made with a so-called sidewall construction, where the board side edges include a sidewall element positioned between top and bottom reinforcement layers and at least partially exposed along the board's edge. In another embodiment, the board may have a cap construction at the nose, tail and running length and the thickness of the board may be defined, at least in part, by the spacing between mold elements used to form the board during a molding process.
In another embodiment, a board may be arranged to increase the board's resistance to bending in particular areas, such as in regions between the binding mounting regions and the nose or tail. For example, the board may have internal members, such as reinforcement elements, that tend to stiffen the board in desired areas. In one embodiment, a core of the board may have an increased or decreased moment of inertia in particular locations such that the board has desired bending characteristics at the binding mounting regions in comparison to adjacent areas in the running length. In one embodiment, the core which is otherwise made of laminated wood strips, may include metal or other material in certain regions.
In another aspect of the invention, a board may have a concave portion in the top surface located at both the forward and rear binding mounting regions, i.e., two separate concave portions may be located at respective front and rear binding mounting regions. Convex portions may be located in the top surface between the binding mounting regions as well as forward of the forward mounting region and rearward of the rear mounting region. In another embodiment, concave portions may be located in the bottom surface of the board under the binding mounting regions so as to give desired bending characteristics to the board. As described in detail below, a variety of options are available to provide a board with bending characteristics in accordance with aspects of the invention.
In one illustrative embodiment, a gliding board includes an upturned nose at a forward end of the board, a tail at a rear end of the board, a running length connected to and located between the nose and tail, a top surface of the board extending from the nose to the tail over a top portion of the running length, a bottom surface of the board extending from the nose to the tail over a lower portion of the running length, at least a portion of the bottom surface being constructed and arranged to contact a gliding surface during riding, side edges on opposite sides of the running length and extending between the nose and the tail, and forward and rear binding mounting features each arranged to engage with and secure a foot binding to the board top surface. The forward and rear binding mounting features may each define a respective forward and rear binding mounting region in the running length in which a respective foot binding is securable to the board with the forward binding mounting feature being located nearer the nose than the rear binding mounting feature. The board may have a greater stiffness with respect to bending of the board about an axis that is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the board in at least one portion between the forward binding mounting region and the nose, or at least one portion between the rear binding mounting region and the tail, than at least one portion of the board within a nearest binding mounting region. In addition, the board may have a greater stiffness with respect to bending of the board about the axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the board in at least one portion between the forward and rear binding mounting regions than at least one portion of the board within both of the binding mounting regions.
Illustrative embodiments that incorporate one or more features according to the invention are described with reference to the following drawings:
Side edges 7 on opposite sides of the running length 4 extend between the nose 2 and the tail 3, and may have any suitable sidecut. For example, the sidecut may be arranged to have a single, relatively large radius of curvature, or may include two or more sections that have different radii of curvature and/or are that are straight. If straight sections are included in the sidecut, the straight sections may be parallel to a longitudinal axis and/or arranged at transverse angles to the longitudinal axis. Although in this example the sidecut is shown to cause the board to be generally narrower near the center of the running length 4 (or waist) than at the transitions to the nose 2 and tail 3, other arrangements are possible, such as having the width of the board at the waist being larger than the width at one or more transitions to the nose or tail. Alternately, the sidecut may be arranged generally as shown in
The board 1 may also include forward and rear binding mounting features 8 that are each arranged to engage with and secure a foot binding (not shown) to the board top surface 5, as is known in the snowboard art. The binding mounting features 8 may be arranged in any suitable way, such as in the form of a channel shown at the forward binding mounting region 9 in
The forward and rear binding mounting features 8 each define a respective forward and rear binding mounting region 9, 10 in the running length 4 in which a respective foot binding is securable to the board. In this embodiment, each of the binding mounting features 8 provide a range of possible mounting positions for the binding, e.g., spanning over approximately 250-300 millimeters along the longitudinal axis of the board. That is, by using the binding mounting features 8, a binding may be mounted at one of a plurality of different, longitudinal positions on the board. (A longitudinal axis of the board extends generally from the nose 2 to the tail 3 near an approximate center of the board 1 as viewed from the top in
In this illustrative embodiment, the board 1 has a greater stiffness (with respect to bending of the board about an axis that is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the board) in at least one portion between the forward binding mounting region 9 and the nose 2, or at least one portion between the rear binding mounting region 10 and the tail 3, than at least one portion of the board within a nearest binding mounting region. For example, in this embodiment, the board 1 has a larger thickness in a portion of the running length adjacent the forward end of the binding mounting region 9 than in at least one portion of the running length within the binding mounting region 9. As a result, the board 1 in this embodiment has a higher stiffness, and a larger resistance to bending, in an area forward of the forward binding mounting region 9 than an area within the binding mounting region 9. Also, the board 1 has a higher stiffness in an area just rearward of the forward binding mounting region 9. With this arrangement, if a rider loads a forward end of the board, as in the case of an ollie or nose press, the board is more likely to bend (or will bend more and/or in a smaller radius of curvature) in an area under the rider's front foot than in an area adjacent forward and rearward ends of the binding mounting region 9. It is this feature that the inventors have unexpectedly found provides significant advantages when performing various tricks and maneuvers on a board.
Although not necessary, the embodiment of
Another aspect of the invention shown in the illustrative embodiment of
Another aspect of the invention illustrated in
Another aspect of the invention illustrated in
In another aspect of the invention, a top surface of the board may include four concave portions. That is, two of the concave portions may be located at respective binding mounting regions 9, 10, one of the concave portions may be located between the nose 2 and the forward binding mounting region 9, and one of the concave portions may be located between the tail 3 and the rear binding mounting region 10. In another embodiment, another concave portion may be located between the binding mounting regions 9 and 10 as shown in
In the above embodiment, the thickness and stiffness variations of the board 1 are mainly achieved by varying the thickness of the core of the board 1, which in this case is made with a sidewall construction. In one embodiment, the thickness of the board's core at the thinnest area of each binding mounting region 9, 10 is approximately 60 mm, while the thickness of the board's core at the thickest area near either end of the binding mounting region 9, 10 is approximately 80 mm. The thickness of the core at the thin area between the binding mounting regions 9, 10 is approximately 61 mm. The core is made in a typical fashion, e.g., using strips of laminated wood, such as alder, balsa, and/or others. This core is then laminated with top and bottom reinforcement layers, top and bottom sheets, polymer sidewall elements, metal edges, and other components commonly used in the manufacture of snowboards. Regarding the type of binding mounting features used, a channel-type binding mount has been found to enable the use of a thinner core, e.g., down to about 50 mm, than may be possible with the use of threaded inserts (which may require a core thickness of about 60 mm).
The board arrangement of
Although in the above embodiments the stiffness variations of the board are achieved by varying the core thickness or otherwise varying the thickness of the board 1, stiffness features of the board may be provided using other techniques. For example, as shown in
Although the embodiments above show the board 1 having no camber, or a flat camber, at the bottom surface 6, other camber arrangements may be used. For example, the board 1 may have a standard camber such that, with the board unweighted, the center portion of the bottom surface 6 is uplifted from an underlying flat surface with only portions of the board 1 near the transitions to the nose and tail being in contact with the underlying surface. In another embodiment, the board 1 may have a reverse camber, or rockered, arrangement such that the bottom surface 6 of the board 1 generally bows downwardly, or is convex, along the running length 4. In another embodiment, the board may have a dual camber arrangement, e.g., such that areas generally at the forward and rear binding mounting regions 9, 10 may have individual cambered sections. Other camber arrangements are possible.
For example,
Although several of the embodiments described above provide for varying board thickness by varying the shape at a top side of the board, other techniques are possible, such as varying the shape of the board at the bottom in addition, or instead of, the top surface.
The
In another aspect of the invention, a board may be provided with various bending characteristics such as those described above by way of interaction of the board with one or more bindings attached to the board at the binding mounting regions. For example, a binding may include wings, rods or other components on a lateral side of the binding that can help reinforce and stiffen the board in areas forward or rearward of a respective binding mounting region. In another embodiment, a stiffening element 11 may be attached to the board along with, or separate from a binding. The stiffening element 11 may be secured to the board 1 using the mounting features 8 or other attachment arrangements, such as screws, adhesive, or other.
In the embodiments above, the stiffness and/or thickness of the board portions may extend in lateral directions across the width of the board 1 in any suitable way, such as a way that is approximately symmetrical with respect to the longitudinal axis 20 of the board. For example,
Of course, other arrangements for the thickness and/or stiffness other than those in
The relative stiffness of portions of the board may be defined in different ways. For example, a portion of the board may be said to be more stiff than another if that portion of the board has a higher moment of inertia than the other board portion. Alternately, a portion of the board may be said to be more stiff than another if that portion exhibits a higher resistance to bending under actual test conditions than another portion. In another embodiment, a board may be uniformly loaded along its length and a first portion of the board that tend to bend in a curve with a larger radius of curvature or along a longer arc length than another second portion may be said to be more stiff than the second portion. In another testing environment, different portions of the board may be tested in isolation and a resistance to a bending force measured. For example, an amount of deflection of one portion of a board in response to a particular load or loading arrangement may be compared to a deflection of another portion of the board in response to the same load or loading arrangement. The portion having a smaller deflection may be said to be more stiff than the other portion.
Using any one of these analyses, a percentage difference in stiffness between two portions of a board may be defined. For example, if a deflection analysis is used as described above, the difference in deflection amounts may be divided by the deflection amount for the less stiff portion to determine a percentage difference in stiffness. A similar calculation may be made using differences in moment of inertia, radii of curvature or other values to define a percentage difference in stiffness between two board portions. In one aspect of the invention, a percentage difference in stiffness between at least one portion of the board between the forward binding mounting region and the nose, or at least one portion between the rear binding mounting region and the tail, and at least one portion of the board within a nearest binding mounting region may be 10%, 20%, 30% or more.
Having thus described several aspects of the invention, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 61/246,081, filed Sep. 25, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3675938 | Sigl | Jul 1972 | A |
3854739 | Toda et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4007946 | Sarver | Feb 1977 | A |
4085947 | Sarver | Apr 1978 | A |
4568296 | Newell | Feb 1986 | A |
5342077 | Abondance | Aug 1994 | A |
5769445 | Morrow | Jun 1998 | A |
5895067 | Stephanova et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6217041 | Hauser et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6499758 | Fournier | Dec 2002 | B1 |
20040084878 | Adamczewski | May 2004 | A1 |
20070170694 | Adamczewski et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090230658 | Fournier | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4207768 | Sep 1993 | DE |
0230813 | Aug 1987 | EP |
2704155 | Oct 1994 | FR |
WO 9925433 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0040310 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 2006044233 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2010072819 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/049744 dated Feb. 17, 2011. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees from the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2012/066617, Mailed Nov. 27, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110156373 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61246081 | Sep 2009 | US |