This invention is related to the field of electronic database management.
Hints are used as a general mechanism to supply directives to the query optimizer when it compiles a SQL statement that influences the plan generated by the compilation process. For example, hints can direct the optimizer to use a particular access path for a table, a specific join method for a join, or a particular join order for the tables. Hints can also be used to provide accurate object or system statistics, to correct optimizer cardinality or cost estimates, or to specify certain optimizer modes (e.g., set an optimizer mode to ALL_ROWS, which causes the plan, when executed, to fetch all the resulting rows of the query). In fact, the entire execution plan can be specified via hints (e.g. in the form of an outline). Hence, hints are one of the main mechanisms used by a database administrator (DBA) to tune, either manually or automatically, the execution plans produced by the optimizer.
Hints can be broadly classified as single-table hints, multi-table hints, query block hints, or statement hints. Single-table hints, such as INDEX and USE_NL (use a nested loop) for example, provide information for processing one table or view, and multi-table hints contain information that can be applied to several tables. A query block hint, such as STAR_TRANSFORMATION and UNNEST for example, operates on a single query block. A statement hint, such as ALL_ROWS, for example, is applied to the entire SQL statement.
Existing hints have several drawbacks. For example, manual hints created by the DBA have to be specified in the query blocks which are being tuned. This requires actually embedding the hint in the query blocks of the SQL statement. However, most packaged applications do not allow the DBA to access the code for the SQL statement, so the DBA is unable to physically insert the hint into the SQL statement. Furthermore, manually inserting a hint into a SQL statement might improve query performance for a while, but can hinder the performance when the system or object characteristics (e.g., workload, object statistics) change, the database is revised, or the software application program is upgraded.
Another disadvantage to the conventional approach for hints is due to query block transformations. Manual hints can be provided for query blocks that are present in the original SQL statement. However, query blocks are often transformed during the compilation process. The DBA cannot know what a transformed query block will look like. Moreover, even if the DBA knew what the query block would be, since it is dynamically generated during the compilation process, there is no way to physically add the hint inside the transformed query block.
A method for determining a name for a query block of a database query language statement and associating one or more tuning hints with the query block using the name is disclosed.
Overview
The embodiments of the invention are described using the term “SQL”, however, the invention is not limited to just this exact database query language, and indeed may be used in conjunction with other database query languages and constructs.
Global hints provide a mechanism to deliver external tuning information to an optimizer that is compiling a SQL statement. Global hints can be created and used manually by a database administrator (DBA) to tune specific SQL statements, or can be automatically created by SQL tuning tools. The global hints can be associated with a specific part of the SQL statement, such as a table or a query block, without being physically located in the query block of the statement itself. For example, the global hints may be stored outside of the targeted object (e.g., the table, query block or SQL statement).
Because the hints are created and stored separately from the SQL statement, they can be dynamically associated with a SQL statement from an external storage location, such as a SQL tuning base (STB), and retrieved by the optimizer from the external storage location when compiling the SQL statement. The SQL tuning base stores SQL profiles, which are a source of external hints. As compared to the conventional notion of embedded hints, which are embedded in the query text, external hints are stored in dictionary tables in the STB and are associated with specific SQL statements.
A global hint associated with a SQL statement may target a query block that is not in the original SQL statement, but rather is created as a result of a query transformation when the SQL statement is compiled. Each query block in a SQL statement has an assigned unique name, so that the global hints can target any query block by specifying the name of the targeted block. Similarly, each table within a query block has a unique alias, which is used by the global hints to target the table. Therefore, the global hints are able to specify which query block, and which tables within the query block, are targeted to receive the tuning information, even if the query blocks are created when the statement is being compiled.
Query Block/Table Alias Names
Each query block has a unique name. This applies to query blocks that are present in the original SQL statement, as well as those that are dynamically generated during the compilation process. For example, when a query is issued, it contains one or more query blocks. The execution plan that is generated by the optimizer may contain some of the original query blocks, as well as new query blocks generated by query transformations. For example, a transformation, such as SELECT, FROM, or WHERE, can rewrite a query block. Some transformations are cost based, such as materialized view rewrite and outer join predicate pushdown. Others are not cost-based, such as simple view merging and predicate move-around. Each query block, including the original query blocks, the pre-transformation query blocks, and the post-transformation query blocks, is named. The name can either be user-specified, or generated by the database system. Each unique name, including the name of a transformed query block, is deterministic.
Providing unique and deterministic names for these otherwise anonymous query blocks allows an optimizer to apply information from an external hint to an associated named query block. For example, a transformation may be applied to a query block that pushes an outer join predicate into a view. Suppose that a user wants to provide a hint to the query block during a specific iteration of a cost-based optimization process, such as hinting a certain index only when the predicate is pushed into the view. Using a conventional approach, adding an index hint in the view or with the original query block name will cause the hint to be applied even when the predicate is not pushed into the view. The global hint can be associated with the transformed query block with the predicate that is pushed into the view by using the unique name of the block.
If an external hint is associated with a query block, the hint is provided with the name of the associated block, and can behave as if the hint were embedded in the named query block. Thus, a hint can be turned into a global hint by specifying a name of a query block. For example, the following query returns the first and last name of each employee with the highest salary in his or her department, returns his or her first job, and returns the total salary of the direct reports of that employee:
Suppose that the user wants to prevent the sub-query for selecting the employee with the highest salary in the department from being unnested, without changing the view. The name of the sub-query, which is SEL$4 in this example, is used to provide this hint, as shown below:
Table aliases also are uniquely named. Generally speaking, tables that are present in the query blocks of the original SQL statement already have unique aliases. However, consider the example of view merging. An outer query block may have the same table aliases as tables referenced in views that are contained in the outer query block. If the view is merged into the outer query block, there will be multiple tables with the same aliases, meaning that hints cannot target a table using this name. The solution is to create unique table aliases using the user-specified table alias and the query block where the table was first specified.
For example, consider the following query which returns each employee reporting directly to Adam Fripp. The query has a view with a table having the same alias as the containing query block. Unique object aliases are used to prevent two tables from having the same alias. In this example, the name of the outer query block is SEL$1, the name of the view query block is SEL$2, and the name of the outer query block after the view is merged into it is SEL$F5BB74E1.
Naming Method
Original
Query blocks that are present in the original SQL statement are pre-rewrite query blocks, and can be named using a numbering scheme, starting from the outermost query block. For example, a global counter can be used to supply a number that provides a new name each time a query block is parsed or generated. The number of the counter can be incremented after each use. Thus, query blocks in the original SQL statement can be named according to the order in which they are parsed. This provides several advantages. First, since the counter is global, each name that the counter generates is guaranteed to be unique (unless a user also defines query block names). Second, the global counter is simple to implement. Third, since the parse order for query blocks in a query is likely to be predictable and stable over multiple releases, users can obtain the names of query blocks in the original query without analyzing the execution plan.
Transformed
Post-query-transformation (or post-rewrite) query blocks have certain characteristics of these query blocks. For example, the parse order of the post-rewrite query blocks is related to the order of the query transformations. Also, the transformation order of a post-rewrite query block can change during the compilation, due to factors such as cost or revised statistics. A method of naming is used that can allow the hint associated with the query block to be applied to the query block, even if the transformation order changes. Thus, plan stability can be maintained.
Post-rewrite query blocks can be new query blocks generated via query transformations, or can be existing query blocks that have received a cost-based transformation. The post-rewrite query blocks can be named using a hash method. In one embodiment of the naming method, the new query block's name can be a function of the original query block's name, the type of the transformation applied to the query block, and other attributes that uniquely characterize the transformation. For example, if a set of views is merged into an outer query block to create a new query block, the new query block's name can be a function of the name of the old outer query block, the merge transformation, and the names of the view query blocks that were merged into the outer query block. An alternative approach of query block naming is to compute a hash value based on the text of the query block. For pre-rewrite query blocks, this can be performed as parse time, since the text is available. Post-rewrite query blocks where the text is unavailable can be unparsed, then hashed.
Parsing
Hint parsing and resolution can be performed with global hints. Hint parsing involves converting a user-specified hint into an internal representation to be processed by the optimizer. The internal representation contains global hint information to perform hint resolution based on the query block names. Hint resolution refers to the process of matching each global hint to its target object, as well as addressing conflicts between different global hints. In one embodiment, hint resolution is postponed until the query has been parsed.
A global hint parser converts hints stores global hint information such as the text of an atomic hint, the text of the source hint, the source query block that specifies the hint, and the destination query block to which the hint is applied. The global hint parser converts the global hints into atomic hints. A hint is atomic if it cannot be decomposed into a set of semantically equivalent hints with fewer arguments each than itself. Consider the following example with both atomic and non-atomic hints:
In one embodiment, each parse process that handles table or block hints also generates and stores atomic hints. The information for the atomic hints are stored in a data structure for the global hint. The source text of the global hint is set by the parser and stored in the data structure. The source and destination query blocks are also stored in this data structure. This example, has three atomic hints in this view. The values for each atomic hint and its source are:
The source query block of a hint is the query block in which the hint is specified. The destination query block of a hint is the query block to which the hint applies. The destination query block may be different from the source query block for global table or global query block hints. Source query blocks are populated when the query block is named. The destination query blocks may be populated during hint resolution.
Hint Resolution
After the query has been parsed, some atomic hints may be unresolved. The unresolved atomic hints have known source query blocks and conflicts with other hints or unknown destination query blocks. For example, a NO_MERGE hint or a table hint may have information about the target object (the destination query block for the merge hint or the destination table for the table hint), but may conflict with other hints. A global table hint may have an ambiguous destination that depends on whether the named object is a view name or a query block name. Also, hints that have dual roles as table or query block hints, such as a NO_MERGE(X) hint, may have unknown destination query blocks.
Hint resolution is the process of matching each unresolved hint to its target object. The unresolved atomic hints are maintained in a chain in the global hint data structure. The hint parsing processes append atomic hints to this chain. As each hint is resolved, it is removed from this chain. During hint resolution, missing destination query blocks are identified. In one approach, a lazy hint resolution is performed to match unresolved table or block hints. In another approach, global hints are matched with destination query blocks based on query block names. For example, if a query block name is specified, the optimizer locates the query block with the specified name. Once the targeted query block is found, if a dotted path qualifier (table alias) is specified, the optimizer resolves the table hint by following a trail of tables in a FROM clause. If a matching query block or table is not found, then the hint may not be used by the optimizer.
After unresolved hints are matched with destination query blocks, target and conflict resolution are performed. Target resolution involves finding a hinted table or query block of a hint, and combining it with other hints. Hint precedence rules govern the resolution of two or more conflicting hints referencing the same object. The rules may be based on a relationship between the source query blocks of the hints.
Conflict Resolution
A query block directly contained in another query block is called a child of the containing query block. The block containing the child is called a parent. The children of a parent's child query block are also called children of the parent. Thus, a child query block is a descendant of a parent query block and the parent query block is an ancestor of its children query blocks. Query blocks without a parent-child relationship between them are called sibling query blocks. A hint precedence procedure may consider each query block as its own sibling. For example, a sub-query query block is a child of its containing query block. Two sub-query query blocks contained in the same query block are siblings, as are query blocks representing each branch of a UNION ALL query.
In one embodiment, hint precedence rules resolve conflicts between a parent query block and a child query block in favor of the parent. Each conflicting hint between sibling query blocks may be discarded. Non-conflicting hints may not be affected by query block relationships. Conflicting sibling hints may be resolved before conflicting parent-child hints. This prevents sibling rivalry from causing a child hint to be discarded. An example of hint precedence is the following:
In this example, the conflicting sibling hints negate each other, leaving the child hint unchanged.
The global hints provide several new hints that can be used to tune a SQL statement. For example, a query block name hint can allow a user to provide a name for a hint. This name can be used in an outer query block to provide hints to tables appearing in the named query block. Also, negative hints, such as NO_QUERY_TRANSFORMATION, can be used to exclude parts of the execution plan search space from consideration by the optimizer. A USE_NL hint instructs the optimizer to use a nested loops join when the specified table occurs on the right side of the join.
Several enhancements may be made to existing hints based on global hints. For example, each single-table, multi-table, and query block hint can use the name of a query block to specify a location of the hint. The hint can then behave as if it were specified in the query block. A leading hint, which specifies the first table in the execution plan chosen by the optimizer, can specify a set of tables as the prefix of the execution plan.
The example below illustrates how several of the global hint formats can be used in a view and a query:
The sub-query is named QBLOCK using the QB_NAME hint. This sub-query is prevented from being unnested by the global NO_UNNEST hint. Two indexes on the table e2 in this sub-query are hinted: one with department_id as its column (i.e. the index emp_department_ix) and the index emp_emp_id_pk. In the view V, the tables e1 and j are fixed as the leading tables in the join order. Also, a nested loops join is used for j, only if the concatenated index jhist_emp_id_st_date_pk (index columns: (employee_id, start_date)) can be used with at least one join predicate on its columns.
Advantages
The algorithms used for naming query blocks and table aliases are guaranteed to generate unique and deterministic names. This gives global hints the ability to be stored persistently, associated with given SQL statements, and assure a DBA that the global hints using these names will still be applied to the correct targets through database or application upgrades.
Global hints need not be physically placed within the query block they target or even in the targeted SQL statement. Global hints can be stored persistently with appropriate mapping to a SQL statement. They can be created manually or by automatic SQL tuning. A global hint can target multiple SQL statements. For example, a global hint that specifies object statistics or predicate selectivities can be applicable to more than one SQL statement.
According to one embodiment of the invention, computer system 400 performs specific operations by processor 404 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in system memory 406. Such instructions may be read into system memory 406 from another computer readable medium, such as static storage device 408 or disk drive 410. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the invention.
The term “computer readable medium” as used herein refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to processor 404 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as disk drive 410. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as system memory 406. Transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber optics, including wires that comprise bus 402. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio wave and infrared data communications.
Common forms of computer readable media includes, for example, floppy disk, flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, RAM, PROM, EPROM, FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
In an embodiment of the invention, execution of the sequences of instructions to practice the invention is performed by a single computer system 400. According to other embodiments of the invention, two or more computer systems 400 coupled by communication link 420 (e.g., LAN, PTSN, or wireless network) may perform the sequence of instructions to practice the invention in coordination with one another. Computer system 400 may transmit and receive messages, data, and instructions, including program, i.e., application code, through communication link 420 and communication interface 412. Received program code may be executed by processor 404 as it is received, and/or stored in disk drive 410, or other non-volatile storage for later execution.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/500,490, filed Sep. 6, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to co-pending applications “SQL TUNING SETS,” application Ser. No. 10/936,449; “AUTO-TUNING SQL STATEMENTS,” application Ser. No. 10/935,908; “SQL PROFILE,” application Ser. No. 10/936,205; “SQL TUNING BASE,” application Ser. No. 10/936,468; “AUTOMATIC LEARNING OPTIMIZER,” application Ser. No. 10/935,906; “AUTOMATIC PREVENTION OF RUN-AWAY QUERY EXECUTION,” application Ser. No. 10/936,779; “METHOD FOR INDEX TUNING OF A SQL STATEMENT, AND INDEX MERGING FOR A MULTI-STATEMENT SQL WORKLOAD, USING A COST-BASED RELATIONAL QUERY OPTIMIZER,” application Ser. No. 10/936,469; “SQL STRUCTURE ANALYZER,” application Ser. No. 10/936,426; “HIGH-LOAD SQL DRIVEN STATISTICS COLLECTION,” application Ser. No. 10/936,427; “AUTOMATIC SQL TUNING ADVISOR,” application Ser. No. 10/936,778, all of which are filed Sep. 7, 2004 and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5140685 | Sipple et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5260697 | Barrett et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5398183 | Elliott | Mar 1995 | A |
5408653 | Josten et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5481712 | Silver et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5504917 | Austin | Apr 1996 | A |
5544355 | Chaudhuri et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5577240 | Demers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5634134 | Kumai et al. | May 1997 | A |
5724569 | Andres | Mar 1998 | A |
5737601 | Jain et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761660 | Josten et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765159 | Srinivasan | Jun 1998 | A |
5781912 | Demers et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794227 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5794229 | French et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806076 | Ngai et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5860069 | Wright | Jan 1999 | A |
5870760 | Demers et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870761 | Demers et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5940826 | Heideman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963933 | Cheng et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963934 | Cochrane et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991765 | Vethe | Nov 1999 | A |
6052694 | Bromberg | Apr 2000 | A |
6122640 | Pereira | Sep 2000 | A |
6195653 | Bleizeffer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212514 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6275818 | Subramanian et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6321218 | Guay et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330552 | Farrar et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349310 | Klein et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353818 | Carino, Jr. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356889 | Lohman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366901 | Ellis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366903 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374257 | Guay et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397207 | Bleizeffer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397227 | Klein et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6434545 | MacLeod et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434568 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442748 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460027 | Cochrane et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460043 | Tabbara et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493701 | Ponnekanti | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496850 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513029 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529901 | Chaudhuri et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560606 | Young | May 2003 | B1 |
6571233 | Beavin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6594653 | Colby et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598038 | Guay et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615223 | Shih et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6701345 | Carley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714943 | Ganesh et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721724 | Galindo-Legaria et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728719 | Ganesh et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728720 | Lenzie | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744449 | MacLeod et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763353 | Li et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6804672 | Klein et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816874 | Cotner et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6839713 | Shi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850925 | Chaudhuri et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865567 | Oommen et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6910109 | Holman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912547 | Chaudhuri et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915290 | Bestgen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931389 | Bleizeffer et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934701 | Hall, Jr. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947927 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961931 | Fischer | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6999958 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007013 | Davis et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7031958 | Santosuosso | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047231 | Grasshoff et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058622 | Tedesco | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7080062 | Leung et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7139749 | Bossman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146363 | Waas et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155426 | Al-Azzawe | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155459 | Chaudhuri et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7272589 | Guay et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7302422 | Bossman et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7353219 | Markl et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020073086 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120617 | Yoshiyama et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020198867 | Lohman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018618 | Bestgen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065648 | Driesch et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088541 | Zilio et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093408 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110153 | Shee | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115183 | Abdo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126143 | Roussopoulos et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130985 | Driesen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135478 | Marshall et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154216 | Arnold et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177137 | MacLeod et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182276 | Bossman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187831 | Bestgen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200204 | Limoges et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200537 | Barsness et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229621 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229639 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002957 | Chaudhuri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003004 | Chaudhuri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019587 | Fuh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034643 | Bonner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040181521 | Simmen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210563 | Zait et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215626 | Colossi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050033734 | Chess et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050097078 | Lohman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097091 | Ramacher et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102305 | Chaudhuri et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119999 | Zait et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120000 | Ziauddin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120001 | Yagoub et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125393 | Yagoub et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125398 | Das et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125427 | Dageville et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125452 | Ziauddin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138015 | Dageville et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177557 | Ziauddin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187917 | Lawande et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050251523 | Rajamani et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004828 | Rajamani et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060167883 | Boukobza | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070038618 | Kosciusko et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050125398 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60500490 | Sep 2003 | US |