Glucagon antagonists

Abstract

Methods for detecting glucagon antagonists through the use of recombinant DNA techniques are provided. Briefly, subsequent to the expression of glucagon analogs within suitable host cells, the analogs are exposed to a glucagon receptor coupled to a response pathway in the presence of native glucagon. A reduction in the stimulation of the response pathway resulting from the binding of the glucagon analog to the glucagon receptor relative to the stimulation of the response pathway by native glucagon alone indicates the presence of a glucagon antagonist. Glucagon antagonists identified and isolated through the methods are also provided.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention is directed generally toward methods for detecting glucagon antagonists, and more specifically, to methods of producing and screening large numbers of potential glucagon antagonists through the use of recombinant DNA techniques.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Human diabetes, a disease in which a major indicator is an elevated blood glucose level, is generally believed to result from low insulin levels and elevated glucagon levels. However, hyperglycemia in non-insulin dependent diabetes, in both non-obese and obese patients, has been shown in the presence of both elevated glucagon and insulin levels.

Insulin is known to rapidly decrease blood glucose levels while glucagon, a polypeptide hormone twenty-nine amino acid residues in length, is believed to contribute to elevated blood glucose levels by binding to liver membrane receptors, and thereby triggering glycogenolysis, which results in the production of glucose. Elevated glucagon levels are also associated with a substantial increase in gluconeogenesis.

While stable control of insulin levels is difficult to achieve, treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes and some non-insulin dependent diabetes has been achieved through a combination of controlled diet and periodic doses of exogenous insulin. It is believed that the therapeutic use of glucagon antagonists will inhibit glycogenolysis and help to lower blood glucose levels in diabetics. These antagonists have the ability to bind to the glucagon receptor in the liver membrane, but are incapable of stimulating adenylate cyclase activity. The binding of glucagon to its cellular receptor is believed to trigger the stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity resulting in the production of cyclic AMP (cAMP), and results in an increase in glycogenolysis and its accompanying release of glucose. The glucagon-stimulated increase in inositol triphosphate, which acts as a signal for the release of calcium.sup.2+ sequestered in the endoplasmic recticulum, has been reported by Wakelam et al. (Nature 323:68-71, 1986), Unson et al. (Peptides 10:1171-1177, 1989) and Pittner and Fain (Biochem. J. 277:371-378, 1991).

Current methods for developing glucagon antagonists have relied on the development of specific glucagon analogs through the deletion or substitution of specific amino acids using solid-phase peptide synthesis, and high-level purification of these glucagon analogs through solid-phase synthesis methods in combination with other chromatographic methods. See, for example, Unson et al. (Peptides 10:1171-1178, 1989), Andreu and Merrifield (Eur. J. Biochem. 164:585-590, 1987), Gysin et al. (Biochemistry 25:8278-8284, 1986), Merrifield (U.S. Pat. No. 4,879,273) and Hruby (U.S. Pat. No. 4,430,326). These methods, however, do not lend themselves to the high through-put screening of large numbers of glucagon analogs.

There exists a need in the art for a method of detecting glucagon antagonists that does not rely upon the high-purity, solid-phase synthesis of glucagon analogs. The present method, through the use of recombinant DNA methods, permits the production of high numbers of glucagon analogs for screening through high through-put antagonist screening assays.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

Briefly stated, the present invention provides methods for detecting the presence of glucagon antagonists. In one aspect, the method comprises: (a) growing host cells containing a DNA construct capable of directing the expression of glucagon analogs, the construct comprising the following operably linked elements: a transcriptional promoter, a secretory signal sequence, a DNA sequence encoding a glucagon analog and a transcriptional terminator, under growth conditions suitable for the expression of the glucagon analog; (b) isolating the glucagon analog encoded by the DNA sequence from the host cells; (c) exposing the isolated glucagon analog in the presence of native glucagon to a glucagon receptor coupled to a response pathway under conditions and for a time sufficient to allow binding of the glucagon analog to the receptor and an associated response through the pathway; and (d) detecting a reduction in the stimulation of the response pathway resulting from the binding of the glucagon analog to the glucagon receptor, relative to the stimulation of the response pathway by native glucagon alone and therefrom determining the presence of a glucagon antagonist.

Within a related aspect, the method comprises: (a) growing a pool of host cells, each containing a DNA construct capable of directing the expression of a glucagon analog and comprising the following operably linked elements: a transcriptional promoter, a secretory signal sequence, a DNA sequence encoding a glucagon analog and a transcriptional terminator, under growth conditions suitable for the expression of the glucagon analogs; (b) isolating the glucagon analogs encoded by the DNA sequences from the host cells; (c) exposing the isolated glucagon analogs in the presence of native glucagon to a glucagon receptor coupled to a response pathway under conditions and for a time sufficient to allow binding of the glucagon analog to the receptor and an associated response through the pathway; and (d) detecting a reduction in the stimulation of the response pathway resulting from the binding of the glucagon analog to the glucagon receptor relative to the stimulation of the response pathway by native glucagon alone and therefrom determining the presence of a glucagon antagonist.

Within another aspect of the present invention, glucagon antagonists are produced from a host cell containing a DNA construct capable of directing the expression of a glucagon antagonist, the construct comprising the following operably linked elements: a transcriptional promoter, a secretory signal sequence, a DNA sequence encoding a glucagon antagonist, wherein the sequence encodes one or more amino acid residues that are different than the corresponding amino acid residues in native glucagon, and a transcriptional terminator.

The present invention also provides a variety of glucagon antagonists selected from the group consisting of substituted glucagons having an alanine residue at position 2. In addition, suitable glucagon antagonists also have an amino acid substitution at position 1, 3-5, 9-11, 21, or 29. Also preferred are glucagon antagonists selected from the group consisting of des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.2 !glucagons. Particularly preferred is the Des-His.sup.1 Ala.sup.2,11 -Glu.sup.21 !glucagon.

These and other aspects will become evident upon reference to the following detailed description and attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates the subcloning of the S. cerevisiae TPI1 promoter and alpha factor prepro sequences.

FIG. 2 discloses the representative expression vector pBS114. Abbreviations used include TPI-P, TPI1 promoter; .alpha., alpha factor signal sequence; TPI-t, TPI1 terminator; and ir1, inverted repeat 1 of the 2 micron plasmid.

FIG. 3 discloses a native glucagon coding sequence corresponding to sequence ID Nos. 1 and 2, which was used for the base sequence for the synthesis of the glucagon and des-His.sup.1 -glucagon oligonucleotide libraries. Numbers above the line refer to the nucleotide sequence.

FIG. 4 discloses cAMP response curves of rat liver membranes to three concentrations of glucagon in the presence of representative glucagon analogs relative to the controls des-His.sup.1 -glucagon and des-His.sup.1- Glu.sup.9 !glucagon.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Prior to setting forth the invention, it may be helpful to an understanding thereof to set forth definitions of certain terms to be used hereinafter.

Analog: A molecule, other than a native ligand, capable of being bound by the ligand-binding domain of a receptor. The molecule may be chemically synthesized, produced through recombinant DNA methodology or may occur in nature.

As used herein, glucagon analogs are glucagon-like polypeptides which contain one or more amino acid residues that are different than the corresponding amino acid residues in native glucagon and are capable of binding to a glucagon receptor. These differences may comprise deletions, additions and/or substitutions of amino acids relative to native glucagon. Glucagon analogs arising from amino acid substitutions of native glucagon amino acids form a family of substituted glucagons. Such substituted glucagons may also comprise deletions or additions of amino acids relative to native glucagon. Substituted glucagons may be glucagon antagonsists.

Response pathway: A response pathway is a biochemical pathway activated in response to external stimuli that is generally but not always directly coupled to a membrane-bound receptor. Response pathways generally induce cellular responses such as extracellular matrix secretion from responsive cell lines, hormone secretion, chemotaxis, differentiation, or the inhibition of cell division of responsive cells. One such response pathway is the adenylate cyclase response pathway, which is coupled to the membrane-bound glucagon receptor. The adenylate cyclase response pathway is induced upon binding of glucagon to its cellular receptor, thereby producing increased intracellular concentrations of cyclic AMP (cAMP).

Antagonist: A molecule capable of binding to a receptor, but that does not stimulate or exhibits reduced stimulation of a response pathway within a cell. Glucagon antagonists are generally identified by their ability to bind to the glucagon receptor and their inability to stimulate a cellular response pathway. In general, putative glucagon antagonists are combined with native glucagon and the production of cAMP is assayed in an adenylate cyclase assay. Glucagon antagonists are identified as those molecules that reduce the stimulation of cAMP production relative to native glucagon alone.

DNA Construct: A DNA molecule, or a clone of such a molecule, either single- or double-stranded that has been modified through human intervention to contain segments of DNA combined and juxtaposed in a manner that as a whole would not otherwise exist in nature.

DNA constructs contain the information necessary to direct the expression, and preferably the secretion of DNA sequences encoding polypeptides of interest. Such DNA constructs, known as expression vectors, will generally include promoters, enhancers and transcription terminators. DNA constructs containing the information necessary to direct the secretion of a polypeptide will also contain at least one secretory signal sequence.

Secretory Signal Sequence: A DNA sequence encoding a secretory peptide. A secretory peptide is an amino acid sequence that acts to direct the secretion of a mature polypeptide or protein from a cell. Secretory peptides are characterized by a core of hydrophobic amino acids and are typically (but not exclusively) found at the amino termini of newly synthesized proteins. Very often the secretory peptide is cleaved from the mature protein during secretion. Such secretory peptides contain processing sites that allow cleavage of the signal peptides from the mature protein as it passes through the secretory pathway. Processing sites may be encoded within the signal peptide or may be added to the signal peptide by, for example, in vitro mutagenesis. Certain secretory peptides may be used in concert to direct the secretion of polypeptides and proteins. One such secretory peptide that may be used in combination with other secretory peptides is the third domain of the yeast Barrier protein.

As noted above, an object of the present invention is to provide improved methods for detecting glucagon antagonists using recombinant methods and host cells. The present invention provides the ability to produce glucagon analogs from transformed or transfected host cells. The analogs are exposed, in the presence of native glucagon, to a glucagon receptor coupled to a response pathway. A reduction in the stimulation of the response pathway as compared to the stimulation obtained using native glucagon alone is indicative of the presence of a glucagon antagonist. Within the present invention, it is preferred that the reduction in the stimulation of the response pathway be equivalent to or greater than the reduction associated with des-His.sup.1 -glucagon, as discussed in more detail below. Glucagon analogs produced according to the present invention may be screened in high throughput antagonist screens. By using recombinant DNA methods, ethe present invention also provides a method for screening pools of glucagon analogs within such high through-put screens to identify glucagon antagonists. The present invention also provides methods for producing glucagon antagonists through the use of recombinant host cells.

The present invention provides methods for producing large numbers of glucagon analogs using pools of DNA sequences encoding such analogs. Glucagon coding sequences may be produced synthetically using standard techniques or may be cloned from, for example, pancreatic cells, using standard cloning methods such as those described by Maniatis et al. (Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1982; which is incorporated herein by reference) or Sambrook et al. (Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989; which is incorporated herein by reference). Glucagon cDNAs have been isolated by, for example, Lund et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:345-349, 1982), Bell et al. (Nature 302:716-718, 1983), Lopez et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:5485-5489, 1983), Bell et al. (Nature 304:368-371, 1983) and Heinrich et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 259:14082-14087, 1984). Pools of DNA sequences encoding glucagon analogs may be generated by saturation mutagenesis of a DNA sequence encoding glucagon (using, for example, the methods described by Little (Gene 88:113-115, 1990), or Hermes et al. (Gene 88:143-151, 1989), or segment-directed mutagenesis (as described, for example, by Shortle et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:5375-5379, 1980). Alternatively, pools of glucagon analogs may be generated by forced nucleotide misincorporation as described by, for example, Liao and Wise (Gene 88:107-111, 1990). Briefly, Liao and Wise describe a method for introducing random point mutations into a cloned DNA fragment via the forced misincorporation of deoxynucleoside triphosphates by either a reverse transcriptase or a mutant T7 DNA polymerase. In combination with specific primers and limiting amounts of non-mutagenic nucleoside triphosphates, these two polymerases, which lack proofreading activity, result in the incorporation of incorrect nucleotides into the primed sequence and provide a wide spectrum of random mutations in a given sequence. Preferably, pools of DNA sequences encoding glucagon analogs are generated by synthesizing randomly mutagenized oligonucleotides using, for example, the method described by Hutchinson et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:710-714, 1986). Preferably, oligonucleotides encoding glucagon analogs are synthesized to form adapters upon hybridization such that the glucagon analog coding sequence is flanked by adhesive ends. It may be particularly preferred to add a sequence encoding a bridging region which allows the in-frame fusion of sequences encoding a secretory signal sequence and the glucagon coding sequence. It may also be particularly preferred to synthesize DNA sequences that encode des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analogs (lacking the codon corresponding to the first amino acid residue of mature glucagon). DNA sequences encoding glucagon analogs are preferably synthesized on an oligonucleotide synthesizer by cross contaminating the reagent bottles that normally contain pure phosphoramidites corresponding to the bases A, G, C, and T at low levels with each of the other bases. Cross contamination of the reagent bottles may be achieved by adding between 0.01% and 14% of each incorrect base, with a cross contamination of between 0.8% and 2% being preferred, and 1% being particularly preferred. The synthesis of the oligonucleotides from a single nonmutagenized residue is particularly preferred. A 1% cross contamination with each incorrect base will theoretically lead to approximately 2.5 base changes per molecule.

The oligonucleotides encoding glucagon analogs are annealed with mutagenized or non-mutagenized oligonucleotides encoding either native or des-His.sup.1 -glucagon. Pools of the annealed oligonucleotide adapters encoding glucagon analogs or des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analogs may be inserted into a suitable expression vector which is in turn introduced by transfection or transformation into a suitable eukaryotic host cell. Expression vectors for use in carrying out the present invention will comprise a promoter capable of directing the transcription of a cloned DNA and a transcriptional terminator.

To direct proteins of the present invention into the secretory pathway of the host cell, at least one secretory signal sequence is operably linked to the DNA sequence of interest. Preferred secretory signals include the glucagon secretory signal (pre-pro sequence), the alpha factor signal sequence (pre-pro sequence; Kurjan and Herskowitz, Cell 30:933-943, 1982; Kurjan et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,082; Brake, EP 116,201), the PHO5 signal sequence (Beck et al., WO 86/00637), the BAR1 secretory signal sequence (MacKay et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,613,572; MacKay, WO 87/002670), the SUC2 signal sequence (Carlson et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:439-447, 1983), the .alpha.-1-antitrypsin signal sequence (Kurachi et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:6826-6830, 1981), the .alpha.-2 plasmin inhibitor signal sequence (Tone et al., J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 102:1033-1042, 1987), the tissue plasminogen activator signal sequence (Pennica et al., Nature 301:214-221, 1983), the E. coli PhoA signal sequence (Yuan et al., J. Biol. Chem. 265:13528-13552, 1990) or any of the bacterial signal sequences reviewed, for example, by Oliver (Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 39:615-649, 1985). Alternatively, a secretory signal sequence may be synthesized according to the rules established, for example, by von Heinje (Eur. J. Biochem. 133:17-21, 1983; J. Mol. Biol. 184:99-105, 1985; Nuc. Acids Res. 14:4683-4690, 1986).

Secretory signal sequences may be used singly or may be combined. For example, a first secretory signal sequence may be used singly or in combination with a sequence encoding the third domain of Barrier (described in co-pending commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/270,933, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety). The third domain of Barrier may be positioned in proper reading frame 3' of the DNA sequence of interest or 5' to the DNA sequence and in proper reading frame with both the secretory signal sequence and the DNA sequence of interest.

Host cells for use in practicing the present invention include mammalian, avian, plant, insect, bacterial and fungal cells. Fungal cells, including species of yeast (e.g., Saccharomyces spp., Schizosaccharomyces spp.) or filamentous fungi (e.g., Aspergillus spp., Neurospora spp.) may be used as host cells within the present invention. Strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are particularly preferred.

Suitable yeast vectors for use in the present invention include YRp7 (Struhl et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:1035-1039, 1978), YEp13 (Broach et al., Gene 8:121-133, 1979), POT vectors (Kawasaki et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,931,373, which is incorporated by reference herein), pJDB249 and pJDB219 (Beggs, Nature 275:104-108, 1978) and derivatives thereof. Such vectors will generally include a selectable marker, which may be one of any number of genes that exhibit a dominant phenotype for which a phenotypic assay exists to enable transformants to be selected. Preferred selectable markers are those that complement host cell auxotrophy, provide antibiotic resistance or enable a cell to utilize specific carbon sources, and include LEU2 (Broach et al., ibid.), URA3 (Botstein et al., Gene 8:17, 1979), HIS3 (Struhl et al., ibid.) or POT1 (Kawasaki et al., ibid.). Another suitable selectable marker is the CAT gene, which confers chloramphenicol resistance on yeast cells.

Preferred promoters for use in yeast include promoters from yeast glycolytic genes (Hitzeman et al., J. Biol. Chem. 255:12073-12080, 1980; Alber and Kawasaki, J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 1:419-434, 1982; Kawasaki, U.S. Pat. No. 4,599,311) or alcohol dehydrogenase genes (Young et al., in Genetic Engineering of Microorganisms for Chemicals, Hollaender et al., (eds.), p. 355, Plenum, N.Y., 1982; Ammerer, Meth. Enzymol. 101:192-201, 1983). In this regard, particularly preferred promoters are the TPI1 promoter (Kawasaki, U.S. Pat. No. 4,599,311, 1986) and the ADH2-4.sup.c promoter (Russell et al., Nature 304:652-654, 1983; Irani and Kilgore, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 183,130, which is incorporated herein by reference). The expression units may also include a transcriptional terminator. A preferred transcriptional terminator is the TPI1 terminator (Alber and Kawasaki, ibid.).

In addition to yeast, proteins of the present invention can be expressed in filamentous fungi, for example, strains of the fungi Aspergillus (McKnight et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,935,349, which is incorporated herein by reference). Examples of useful promoters include those derived from Aspergillus nidulans glycolytic genes, such as the ADH3 promoter (McKnight et al., EMBO J. 4:2093-2099, 1985) and the tpiA promoter. An example of a suitable terminator is the ADH3 terminator (McKnight et al., ibid., 1985). The expression units utilizing such components are cloned into vectors that are capable of insertion into the chromosomal DNA of Aspergillus.

Techniques for transforming fungi are well known in the literature, and have been described, for instance, by Beggs (ibid.), Hinnen et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:1929-1933, 1978), Yelton et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:1740-1747, 1984), and Russell (Nature 301:167-169, 1983). The genotype of the host cell will generally contain a genetic defect that is complemented by the selectable marker present on the expression vector. Choice of a particular host and selectable marker is well within the level of ordinary skill in the art. To optimize production of the heterologous proteins, it is preferred that the host strain carries a mutation, such as the yeast pep4 mutation (Jones, Genetics 85:23-33, 1977), which results in reduced proteolytic activity.

In addition to fungal cells, cultured mammalian cells may be used as host cells within the present invention. Preferred cultured mammalian cells for use in the present invention include the COS-1 (ATCC CRL 1650), BHK, and 293 (ATCC CRL 1573; Graham et al., J. Gen. Virol. 36:59-72, 1977) cell lines. A preferred BHK cell line is the BHK 570 cell line (deposited with the American Type Culture Collection under accession number CRL 10314). In addition, a number of other mammalian cell lines may be used within the present invention, including Rat Hep I (ATCC CRL 1600), Rat Hep II (ATCC CRL 1548), TCMK (ATCC CCL 139), Human lung (ATCC CCL 75.1), Human hepatoma (ATCC HTB-52), Hep G2 (ATCC HB 8065), Mouse liver (ATCC CCL 29.1), NCTC 1469 (ATCC CCL 9.1) and DUKX cells (Urlaub and Chasin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 77:4216-4220, 1980).

Mammalian expression vectors for use in carrying out the present invention will include a promoter capable of directing the transcription of a cloned gene or cDNA. Preferred promoters include viral promoters and cellular promoters. Viral promoters include the immediate early cytomegalovirus promoter (Boshart et al., Cell 41:521-530, 1985) and the SV40 promoter (Subramani et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 1:854-864, 1981). Cellular promoters include the mouse metallothionein-1 promoter (Palmiter et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,579,821), a mouse V.sub.K promoter (Bergman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:7041-7045, 1983; Grant et al., Nuc. Acids Res. 15:5496, 1987) and a mouse V.sub.H promoter (Loh et al., Cell 33:85-93, 1983). A particularly preferred promoter is the major late promoter from Adenovirus 2 (Kaufman and Sharp, Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:1304-13199, 1982). Such expression vectors may also contain a set of RNA splice sites located downstream from the promoter and upstream from the DNA sequence encoding the peptide or protein of interest. Preferred RNA splice sites may be obtained from adenovirus and/or immunoglobulin genes. Also contained in the expression vectors is a polyadenylation signal located downstream of the coding sequence of interest. Suitable polyadenylation signals include the early or late polyadenylation signals from SV40 (Kaufman and Sharp, ibid.), the polyadenylation signal from the Adenovirus 5 E1B region and the human growth hormone gene terminator (DeNoto et al., Nuc. Acids Res. 9:3719-3730, 1981). The expression vectors may include a noncoding viral leader sequence, such as the Adenovirus 2 tripartite leader, located between the promoter and the RNA splice sites. Preferred vectors may also include enhancer sequences, such as the SV40 enhancer and the mouse .mu. enhancer (Gillies, Cell 33:717-728, 1983). Expression vectors may also include sequences encoding the adenovirus VA RNAs.

Cloned DNA sequences may be introduced into cultured mammalian cells by, for example, calcium phosphate-mediated transfection (Wigler et al., Cell 14:725, 1978; Corsaro and Pearson, Somatic Cell Genetics 7:603, 1981; Graham and Van der Eb, Virology 52:456, 1973.) Other techniques for introducing cloned DNA sequences into mammalian cells, such as electroporation (Neumann et al., EMBO J. 1:841-845, 1982), may also be used. In order to identify cells that have integrated the cloned DNA, a selectable marker is generally introduced into the cells along with the gene or cDNA of interest. Preferred selectable markers for use in cultured mammalian cells include genes that confer resistance to drugs, such as neomycin, hygromycin, and methotrexate. The selectable marker may be an amplifiable selectable marker. A preferred amplifiable selectable marker is the DHFR gene. Selectable markers are reviewed by Thilly (Mammalian Cell Technology, Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham, Mass., which is incorporated herein by reference). The choice of selectable markers is well within the level of ordinary skill in the art.

Selectable markers may be introduced into the cell on a separate plasmid at the same time as the gene of interest, or they may be introduced on the same plasmid. If on the same plasmid, the selectable marker and the gene of interest may be under the control of different promoters or the same promoter, the latter arrangement producing a dicistronic message. Constructs of this type are known in the art (for example, Levinson and Simonsen, U.S. Pat. No. 4,713,339). It may also be advantageous to add additional DNA, known as "carrier DNA" to the mixture which is introduced into the cells.

Transfected mammalian cells are allowed to grow for a period of time, typically 1-2 days, to begin expressing the DNA sequence(s) of interest. Drug selection is then applied to select for growth of cells that are expressing the selectable marker in a stable fashion. For cells that have been transfected with an amplifiable selectable marker the drug concentration may be increased in a stepwise manner to select for increased copy number of the cloned sequences, thereby increasing expression levels.

Preferred prokaryotic host cells for use in carrying out the present invention are strains of the bacteria Escherichia coli, although Bacillus and other genera are also useful. Techniques for transforming these hosts and expressing foreign DNA sequences cloned therein are well known in the art (see, e.g., Maniatis et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1982; which is incorporated herein by reference, or Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989; which is incorporated herein by reference). Vectors used for expressing cloned DNA sequences in bacterial hosts will generally contain a selectable marker, such as a gene for antibiotic resistance, and a promoter that functions in the host cell. Appropriate promoters include the trp (Nichols and Yanofsky, Meth. Enzymol. 101:155-164, 1983), lac (Casadaban et al., J. Bacteriol. 143:971-980, 1980), and phage .lambda. (Queen, J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 2:1-10, 1983) promoter systems. Plasmids useful for transforming bacteria include pBR322 (Bolivar et al., Gene 2:95-113, 1977), the pUC plasmids (Messing, Meth. Enzymol. 101:20-78, 1983; Vieira and Messing, Gene 19:259-268, 1982), pCQV2 (Queen, ibid.), and derivatives thereof. Plasmids may contain both viral and bacterial elements.

Given the teachings provided herein, promoters, terminators and methods for introducing expression vectors encoding glucagon analogs of the present invention into plant, avian and insect cells would be evident to those of skill in the art. The use of baculoviruses, for example, as vectors for expressing heterologous DNA sequences in insect cells has been reviewed by Atkinson et al. (Pestic. Sci. 28:215-224,1990). The use of Agrobacterium rhizogenes as vectors for expressing genes in plant cells has been reviewed by Sinkar et al. (J. Biosci. (Bangalore) 11:47-58, 1987).

Host cells containing DNA constructs of the present invention are then grown to produce the glucagon analogs of the present invention. The cells are grown according to standard methods in a growth medium containing nutrients required for growth of mammalian or fungal host cells. A variety of suitable media are known in the art and generally include a carbon source, a nitrogen source, essential amino acids, vitamins, minerals and growth factors. The growth medium will generally select for cells containing the DNA construct by, for example, drug selection or deficiency in an essential nutrient which is complemented by the selectable marker on the DNA construct or co-transfected with the DNA construct.

Suitable growth conditions for yeast cells, for example, include culturing in a chemically defined medium, comprising a nitrogen source, which may be a non-amino acid nitrogen source or a yeast extract, inorganic salts, vitamins and essential amino acid supplements at a temperature between 4.degree. C. and 37.degree. C. with 30.degree. C. being particularly preferred. The pH of the medium is preferably maintained at a pH greater than 2 and less than 8, more preferably pH 5-6. Methods for maintaining a stable pH include buffering and constant pH control, preferably through the addition of sodium hydroxide. Preferred buffering agents include succinic acid and Bis-Tris (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). Yeast cells having a defect in a gene required for asparagine-linked glycosylation are preferably grown in a medium containing an osmotic stabilizer. A preferred osmotic stabilizer is sorbitol supplemented into the medium at a concentration between 0.1M and 1.5M, preferably at 0.5M or 1.0M. Cultured mammalian cells are generally cultured in commercially available serum-containing or serum-free media. Selection of a medium appropriate for the particular cell line used and suitable growth conditions is within the level of ordinary skill in the art.

Individual transformants expressing the glucagon analogs may then be cloned or pooled as discussed herein. In the case of Saccharomyces cerevisiae transformants, individual transformants may be picked using sterile toothpicks onto selective media. In the case of cultured mammalian cell transfectants, individual transfectants may be isolated by cylinder cloning into multi-well culture plates. These assays will generally include the steps of (a) growing host cells containing a DNA construct capable of directing the expression of a glucagon analog, the construct comprising the following operably linked elements: a transcriptional promoter, a secretory signal sequence, a DNA sequence encoding a glucagon analog and a transcriptional terminator, under growth conditions suitable for the expression of the glucagon analog; (b) isolating the glucagon analog encoded by the DNA sequence from the host cells; (c) exposing the isolated glucagon analogs in the presence of native glucagon to a glucagon receptor coupled to a response pathway under conditions and for a time sufficient to allow binding of the glucagon analog to the receptor and an associated response through the pathway; (d) detecting a reduction in the stimulation of the response pathway resulting from the binding of the glucagon analog to the glucagon receptor relative to the stimulation of the response pathway by native glucagon, and therefrom determining the presence of a glucagon antagonist. Conditions and times sufficient for the binding of the glucagon analog to the receptor will vary with the source of the receptor; however, conditions suitable for the binding will generally be between 4.degree. C. and 55.degree. C. in a buffer solution between 0 and 2M NaCl, preferably between 0 and 0.9M NaCl, with 0.1M NaCl being particularly preferred, within a pH range of between 5 and 9, preferably between 6.8 and 8. Sufficient time for the binding and response will generally be between 5 and 15 minutes after exposure, with 12 minutes being particularly preferred.

As noted above, antagonists are capable of binding to a cellular receptor of the native molecule, but either are incapable of stimulating a response pathway or exhibit reduced stimulation of a response pathway. Suitable cellular response pathways include the adenylate cyclase response pathway and the inositol phosphate response pathway. Adenylate cyclase activity assays are described, for example, by Lin et al. (Biochemistry 14:1559-1563, 1975; which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Biological responses via the insotitol triphosphate pathway may assessed by measuring inositol phosphate metabolism as generally described in Subers and Nathanson (J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 20:131-140, 1988; which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) or Pittner and Fain (ibid.; which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) or by measuring the intracellular calcium concentration as generally described by Grynkiewicz et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 260:3440-3450, 1985; which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). In one embodiment, glucagon antagonists have generally been identified through their ability to bind to a cellular glucagon receptor and their inability to stimulate the adenylate cyclase response pathway. Glucagon receptors have been reported in a number of tissues, for example, liver, kidney, cardiac muscle and adipose tissue from a number of species including dog, pig, human and rat. Adenylate cyclase activity assays may be carried out using, for example, the method described by Lin et al. (Biochemistry 14:1559-1563, 1975). These methods measure the level of stimulation of cAMP production relative to native glucagon and generally involve exposing a membrane preparation from tissue containing glucagon receptors to a mixture of glucagon and the glucagon analog in the presence of ATP. Membrane preparations from rat liver are generally used for adenylate cyclase activity assays although other tissues containing glucagon receptors may be used. Membranes may be prepared using the method described by Neville (Biochim. Biophys Acta 154:540-552, 1968) as modified by Pohl (Methods in Receptor Research, Ed. Blecher, M., New York, pp 160-164, 1976). Briefly, young female Sprague-Dawley rats were used for the preparation of the liver membranes; however, other laboratory strains are acceptable. Sixty to one hundred grams of rat liver are batch processed by first mincing the tissue into approximately 3-6 mm pieces. The minced tissue is suspended in ice cold 1 mM sodium bicarbonate at a concentration of approximately 300 g/l. The suspension is batch processed in a tissue homogenizer with eight strokes of the loose pestle. The homogenate is mixed with additional ice cold 1 mM sodium bicarbonate to yield a final concentration of about 40-80 g/l. The diluted homogenate is stirred for at least three minutes following which it is filtered through a double layer of cheese cloth. The filtrate is refiltered through four layers of cheese cloth and transferred to centrifuge bottles and centrifuged at 1500.times. g for 30 minutes at 4.degree. C.

After centrifugation, the supernatant is carefully decanted and discarded, and the pellets are gently resuspended in the remaining supernatant with three strokes of the loose pestle in a clean tissue homogenizer. The volume of the resuspended supernatant is to total 165 ml in a final concentration of 44% sucrose. After thorough mixing, the sucrose concentration is measured with a refractometer and adjusted to between 43.9% to 44.1% sucrose (corresponding to a refractive index between 1.4076 and 1.4080) with either 69% sucrose or water. The adjusted suspension is distributed into six 1".times.3.5" cellulose nitrate tubes and the tubes are filled and balanced by overlaying with a fresh sucrose solution which had been adjusted to a concentration between 42.2% to 42.4% sucrose (corresponding to a refractive index between 1.4042 and 1.4046). The samples are centrifuged in a swinging bucket ultracentrifuge rotor appropriate to the tubes being used (e.g., Beckman SW28 or SW25.2; Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, Calif.) at 25,000 rpm for 150minutes at 4.degree. C.

The purified membranes are recovered as a layerfloating at the top meniscus of the tubes by eitherscooping with a spoon-shaped spatula or removal by suctioninto a syringe through an 18-gauge needle. The membranesare resuspended in 10 ml of 1 mM bicarbonate by suctionand expulsion from a 10-25 ml syringe through an 18-gaugeor 20-gauge needle. Following resuspension, the membranesare washed by adding 60-80 ml of 1 mM bicarbonate andcentrifugation at 15,000 rpm in a high speed centrifuge.The supernatants are discarded, and the pellets areresuspended in 1 mM bicarbonate and pooled to yieldapproximately 5-10 ml of concentrated hepatocytemembranes. The membrane preparation is aliquoted andstored frozen at -80.degree. C. for up to six months.

The protein concentration of the membranepreparation is determined by diluting 10-20 .mu.l of themembrane preparation 100-fold in 1M NaCl, 0.17Msodium phosphate (pH 7.0) buffer. The absorbance of thissolution relative to the buffer is measured in 1-cm quartzcuvettes at 224 nm and 236.5 nm wave length in a UVspectrophotometer. Protein concentration is calculatedaccording to the formula:

A.sub.224 nm -A.sub.236.5 =(mg/ml protein) (6.45) (100)

An adenylate cyclase activity assay is carriedout by first preparing Solution A, Solution B, 100.times. glucagon stock, and Stop Mix. Solution A contains between50 mM and 200 mM Tris HCl at between pH 7.4 to 7.8, between 20 mM to 100 mM MgCl.sub.2, and between 0.2% to 0.4%bovine serum albumin (BSA). It may be preferable to addbetween 2 and 8 mg/ml of creatine phosphokinase (SigmaChemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). Most preferably, Solution Acontains 100 mM Tris HCl pH 7.6, 20 mM MgCl.sub.2,0.4% BSA, 4 mg/ml creatine phosphokinase. Solution B contains between0.4 and 20 mM ATP, between 1.6 .mu.M and 25 mM GTP, between 0 and 4 mM isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine (IBMX) and between2 and 8 mM EDTA. It may be preferable to add between 60 and240 mM creatine phosphate (Sigma Chemical Co.). Mostpreferably, Solution B contains 4 mM ATP, 20 .mu.M GTP,4 mMIBMX, 4 mM EDTA, and 120 nM creatine phosphate.100.times. glucagon solution contains 1 .mu.M glucagon. Stop mixcontains 100 mM acetic acid, 50 mM EDTA. Alternatively,the reactions may be stopped by heating the reaction in aboiling water bath for 5 minutes. Glucagon receptor-containingmembrane preparations may be prepared using themethod of Pohl et al. (ibid.), which has been describedabove.

The adenylate cyclase reaction, which convertsATP to cAMP, may be carried out by adding the isolatedglucagon analogs to the wells of a microtiter plate atmicromolar concentrations. Equal volumes of Solution Aand Solution B are mixed and 50 .mu.l of the mixture is addedto each negative control well. Glucagon is added to theremaining Solution A + Solution B mixture to a finalconcentration of 1.times.10.sup.-8 M from the 100.times. glucagon stocksolution, and 50 .mu.l of this solution is added to each wellcontaining a glucagon analog. The membrane preparation isdiluted with water to between 0.2 and 10 mg/ml, preferably2 mg/ml protein, and 45 .mu.l of the diluted membranes areadded to each well to start the reaction. The reactionmixtures are incubated at room temperature for 12 minutes,and the reactions are stopped by the addition of 100 .mu.l ofStop solution to each well. The reactions are clarifiedby centrifugation and stored at 4.degree. C.

In general, cAMP production is measured by theconversion of 32P-ATP to cAMP. Cyclic AMP production maybe measured using the method of Salomon et al. (Anal.Biochem. 58:541-548, 1976) or Krishna et al.(J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 163:379, 1968), or may bemeasured using a commercially available kit from, forexample, Amersham Corporation. However, it is preferredthat cAMP production be measured using a ScintillationProximity Assay manufactured by Amersham (ArlingtonHeights, Ill.). Using the manufacturers directions, theAmersham Scintillation Proximity Assay Kit is used tomeasure the production of cAMP by competition ofiodinated-cAMP with anti-cAMP antibodies. Preferably, 10 .mu.l from each well of the adenylate cyclase reaction isadded to individual beta plate wells and each sample isdiluted with 65 .mu.l of NaAcetate. Standards are preparedat 1.6 pMole and 6.4 pMole from the non-acetylationstandards supplied with the Amersham kit and 75 .mu.l of eachstandard is added to triplicate sample wells. Onehundred-fifty microliters of buffer (Amersham) is added totriplicate wells for nonspecific binding controls.Seventy-five microliters of .sup.125 I-cAMP is added to eachwell. Seventy-five microliters of diluted rabbit anti-succinylcAMP is added to each well, except thenonspecific binding control wells. Seventy-fivemicroliters of diluted anti-rabbit SPA reagent is added toeach well, and the plates sealed and incubated overnightat room temperature with shaking. After the overnightincubation, the reactions are counted in a beta-platecounter (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden).

Within this embodiment, glucagon antagonists maybe identified as those which inhibit the stimulation ofthe rat liver membrane adenylate cyclase by glucagon. Thepercent response may be determined using the formula:

%R.sub.X =(CPM-CPM.sub.NSB)/(CPM.sub.0.0 -CPM.sub.NSB) where %R.sub.X =Percent response for a givensample or standard CPM=Sample counts CPM.sub.NSB =Mean NSB control counts CPM.sub.0.0 =Mean 0.0M standard counts The relative concentration of cAMP for a given sample maybe determined using the formula: cAMp!.sub.X =1.6 e.sup.ln4(%Rx-%R1.6)/(%R6.4-%R1.6) where cAMP!.sub.X =the relative concentration of agiven sample %Rx=Percent response for a givensample %R1.6=Percent response for the 1.6.times.10.sup.-9 M standard %R6.4=Percent response for a the 6.4.times.10.sup.-9 M standard Thus, assay wells containing significantly less cAMP thanthe average may be identified as containing glucagonantagonists.

The glucagon antagonists of the presentinvention may be purified by ion-exchange and partitionchromatography as described by, for example, Coy et al.(Peptides Structure and Function, Pierce Chemical Company,Rockford, Ill., pp. 369-372, 1983), by reverse-phasechromatography as described, for example, by Andreu andMerrifield (Eur. J. Biochem. 164:585-590, 1987), or byHPLC as described by, for example, Kofod et al., Int. J.peptide Protein Res. 32:436-440, 1988). Additionalpurification may be achieved by conventional chemicalpurification means, such as liquid chromatography,gradient centrifugation, and gel electrophoresis, amongothers. Methods of protein purification are known in theart (see generally, Scopes, R., Protein Purification, Springer-Verlag, NY (1982), which is incorporated hereinby reference) and may be applied to the purification ofthe recombinant glucagon analogs described herein.Alternatively, glucagon analogs may be synthesized by thesolid-phase method of Barany and Merrifield (in ThePeptides Vol. 2A, Gross and Meienhofer, eds, AcademicPress, NY, pp. 1-284, 1979) or by use of an automatedpeptide synthesizer.

Information obtained from glucagon antagonistsproduced through the mutagenesis or nucleotidemisincorporation methods disclosed herein may be used todesign additional glucagon antagonists. For example, datapresented hereinbelow indicate that amino acid residues 1-5, 9-11, 21 and 29 are important for glucagon activity.Changes at these positions may be combined to give avariety of glucagon antagonists, including des-His.sup.1 -glucagons,that can be produced through geneticengineering techniques or by conventional chemicalsynthesis. Particularly preferred glucagon antagonsistsare substituted glucagons including Ala.sup.2 !glucagons anddes-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.2 !glucagons. Particularly preferredchanges include the substitution of an alanine residue at position11, a glutamate residue at position 21, and a serineresidue at position 29.

Substantially pure recombinant or syntheticglucagon antagonists of at least about 50% are preferred,at least about 70-80% more preferred, and 95-99% ormore homogeneity most preferred, particularly forpharmaceutical uses. Once purified, partially or tohomogeneity, as desired, the recombinant glucagon analogsmay then be used therapeutically. In general, theantagonists of the present invention are administeredparenterally or by infusion. The antagonists of thepresent invention may be present as free bases or as acidsalts. Suitable salts will be pharmaceutically acceptableand include metal salts, alkali and alkaline earth metalsalts such as potassium or sodium salts. Otherpharmaceutically acceptable salts include citric,succinic, lactic, hydrochloric and hydrobromic acids.Parenteral compositions may be formulated in aqueousisotonic solutions of between pH 5.6 and 7.4. Suitableisotonic solutions include sodium chloride, dextrose,boric acid sodium tartrate, and propylene glycolsolutions. Therapeutic doses of antagonists of thepresent invention may be administered simultaneously withinsulin either in the same composition or in separatecompositions.

The following examples are provided for purposesof illustration, not by way of limitation.

EXAMPLES

Example 1--Construction of the Yeast Expression VectorpBS114

Plasmid pEAS102, comprising portions of theyeast vectors YIp5 and pJDB207, was constructed asfollows. Plasmid pJDB207 (Beggs, Proceedings of AlfredBenzon Symposium 16:383-389, "Molecular Genetics inYeast," Copenhagen, Denmark, 1981), a derivative ofpJDB219 (Beggs, ibid., 1978), was digested with Bam HI andPst I to isolate the 4.4 kb fragment comprising the leu2-dgene, 2 micron plasmid and pBR322 sequences. PlasmidYIp5 (Struhl et al., ibid.) was subjected to partial digestionwith Pst I and complete digestion with Bam HI to isolatethe 4.3 kb fragment comprising the URA3 gene and pBR322sequence. These two fragments were ligated and theresultant plasmid was designated pEAS102.

The Hind III site in plasmid pEAS102 wasdestroyed by first digesting pEAS102 with Hind III tocompletion. The linearized plasmid was then incubatedwith DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) in the presence ofnucleotide triphosphates, recircularized by treatment withT4 DNA ligase and transformed into E. coli strain HB101.DNA prepared from the resulting transformants was screenedfor those plasmids which could no longer be linearized bydigestion with Hind III.

To construct a yeast expression vector, thepromoter and terminator regions from the Saccharomycescerevisiae TPI1 gene along with the alpha factor (MF.alpha.1)prepro sequence were inserted into the pEAS102 derivativedescribed above.

The TPI1 promoter and alpha factor preprosequence were obtained plasmid pTGFem (FIG. 1), whichwas derived from plasmid pB12, which contained the TPI1 promoter, the MF.alpha.1 prepro sequence, PDGF-BB sequence, theTPI1 terminator and pIC19R vector sequences. Theconstruction of pB12 is described by Murray et al. (U.S.Pat. No. 4,766,073, which is incorporated herein byreference). The MF.alpha.1 prepro sequence and PDGF-BB sequencewere subcloned as an Eco RI-Xba I fragment into M13. TheSst I site present in the MF.alpha.1 prepro sequence was changedto a Hind III site by in vitro mutagenesis using themethod described by Kunkel et al. (U.S. Pat. No.4,873,192) and oligonucleotide ZC1159 (Table 1, Sequence ID No. 3). A clone having a Hind III site in place ofthe Sst I site was identified. A fragment containing the MF.alpha.1 prepro sequence was isolated as an Eco RI-Hind

TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________Oligonucleotide Sequences (5' to 3')__________________________________________________________________________ZC1159 (Sequence ID Number 3)TTG TCC AAG CTT ACA CCT TCZC1197 (Sequence ID Number 4)AGC TTG GAC AAG AGA GTT GTT TCT CAC TTC AAC GAC TGT CCAGAC CCT CAC ACC CAA TTC TGT TTC CAC GGT ACC TGT ACA TZC1198 (Sequence ID Number 5)TCT TGG TTC AAG AAG ACA AGC CAG CAT GCG TTT GTC ACT CTGGTT ACG TTG GTG CTA GAT GTG AAC ACG CTG TGT TGG CTT AAA TZC1199 (Sequence ID Number 6)CCA ACA ATG TAC AGG TAC CGT GGA AAC AGA ATT GGG TGT GAGAGT CTG GAC AGT CGT TGA AGT GAG AAA CAA CTC TCT TGT CCAZC1200 (Sequence ID Number 7)CTA GAT TTA AGC CAA CAA GTC AGC GTG TTC ACA TCT AGC ACCAAC GTA ACC AGA GTG ACA AAC GCA TGC TGG CTT GTC TTC TTG AAZC3020 (Sequence ID Number 8)AGC TTA GAT AAG AGA CAC TCT CAA GGT ACC TTT ACC TCT GACTAC TCT AAG TAT CTA GAC TCG AGG CGT GCT CAA GAC TTT GTTCAA TGG TTG ATG AAT ACC TGA ATT CAZC3021 (Sequence ID Number 9)GAT CTG AAT TCA GGT ATT CAT CAA CCA TTG AAC AAA GTC TTGAGC ACG CCT CGA GTC TAG ATA CTT AGA GTA GTC AGA GGT AAAGGT ACC TTG AGA GTG TCT CTT ATC TAZC3378 (Sequence ID Number 10)AGC TTA GAT AAG AGA TCT CAA GGT ACC TTT ACC TCT GAC TACTCT AAG TAT CTA GAC TCG AGG CGT GCT CAA GAC TTT GTT CAATGG TTG ATG AAT ACC TGA ATT CAZC3443 (Sequence ID Number 11)GAT CTG AAT TCA GGT ATT CAT CAA CCA TTG AAC AAA GTC TTGAGC ACG CCT CGA GTC TAG ATA CTT AGA GTA TTC AGA GGT AAAGGT ACC TTG AGA TCT CTT ATC TA__________________________________________________________________________

A transforming growth factor .alpha. (TGF.alpha.) sequencewas synthesized using a set of four oligonucleotidesdesigned and synthesized to form, when annealed, anadapter flanked on the 5' end with a Hind III adhesive endand on the 3' end with an Xba I adhesive end.Oligonucleotides ZC1197, ZC1198, ZC1199, and ZC1200 (Table1, Sequence ID Nos. 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively) werekinased, annealed and ligated into Xba I-Hind IIIlinearized M13mp18. Single-stranded DNAs from theresultant clones were sequenced to confirm that the insertencoded TGF.alpha.. The TGF.alpha. insert was isolated as a Hind III-XbaI fragment.

As shown in FIG. 1, the Eco RI-Hind IIIfragment containing the MF.alpha.1 prepro sequence and the HindIII-Xba I fragment containing the TGF.alpha. sequence wereligated with Eco RI-Xba I linearized pUC13. The resultantplasmid, designated .alpha.fTGF.alpha./pUC13, was digested with Eco RIand Xba I to isolate the MF.alpha.1-TGF.alpha. insert which was clonedinto B170CB/pBR. Plasmid B170CB/pBR, which is describedby Murray (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/557,219, which is incorporated herein by reference), contains theTPI1 promoter, MF.alpha.1 prepro sequence, PDGF-BB codingsequence, the TPI1 terminator and pBR322 vector sequences.Plasmid pB170CB/pBR was digested with Eco RI-Xba I toisolate the fragment containing the TPI1 promoter, pBR322 vector sequence and the TPI1 terminator. The Eco RI-Xba IpB170CB/pBR fragment and the Eco RI-Xba I MF.alpha.1-TGF.alpha. fragment were ligated. The resulting plasmid, designatedTGF.alpha.CB, was digested with Cla I and Bam HI to isolate theexpression unit, which was subcloned into the yeastexpression vector pMPOT2 (a yeast 2 micron-based plasmidcontaining yeast and bacterial replication origins,ampicillin resistance gene and POT1 selectable marker;deposited with American Type Culture Collection as an E.coli HB101 transformant under accession number 67788; disclosed by Murray et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,766,073, incorporated herein by reference) to construct pTGF.alpha.m(FIG. 1). Plasmid pTGF.alpha.m was digested with Bgl II andHind III to isolate the 1236 base pair fragment containingthe TPI1 promoter and MF.alpha.1 prepro sequence.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae TPI1 terminatorfragment was obtained from plasmid pFG1 (Alber andKawasaki, ibid.). It encompassed the region from thepenultimate amino acid codon of the TPI1 gene to the EcoRI site approximately 700 base pairs downstream. A Bam HIsite was substituted for the unique Eco RI site of pFG1 byfirst digesting the plasmid with Eco RI, then blunting theadhesive ends with DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment),adding synthetic Bam HI linkers (CGGATCCA), and religatingto produce plasmid p136. The TPI1 terminator wasthen excised from p136 as an Xba I-Bam HI fragment. Thisfragment was ligated into YEp13 (Broach et al., ibid.),which had been linearized with Xba I and Bam HI. Theresulting plasmid was designated p213. The Hind III sitewas then removed from the TPI1 terminator region of p213 by digesting the plasmid with Hind III, blunting theresultant termini with DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment),and recircularizing the linear molecule using T4 DNAligase. The resulting plasmid was designated p270.

Alternatively, p270 may be constructed bydigesting plasmid pM220 (deposited with American TypeCulture Collection as an E. coli RR1 transformant,accession number 39853) with Xba I and Bam HI, purifyingthe TPI1 terminator fragment (approximately 700 bp) andinserting this fragment into Xba I-Bam HI digested YEp13.

The TPI1 terminator was removed from plasmidp270 as an Xba I-Bam HI fragment. This fragment wascloned into pUC19 along with another fragment containingthe TPI1 promoter joined to the CAT (chloramphenicolacetyl transferase) gene to obtain a TPI1 terminatorfragment with an Eco RV end. The resultant plasmid wasdesignated pCAT. The TPI1 terminator was then removedfrom pCAT as an Eco RV-Bam HI fragment and cloned intopIC19H (Marsh et al., ibid.), which had been linearizedwith the same enzymes, to obtain plasmid pTTI. PlasmidpTTI was then digested with Hind III and Sal I to isolatethe 718 bp TPI1 terminator fragment.

The 1236 base pair Bgl II-Hind III TPI1 promoter-MF.alpha.1 fragment and the 718 base pair HindIII-Sal I TPI1 terminator fragment were ligated with thepEAS102 derivative that have been linearized by digestion with BamHI and Sal I. The ligation mixture was transformed intoE. coli strain HB101, and plasmid DNA prepared fromselected transformants was screened by restrictionanalysis to identify a clone bearing a plasmid of thecorrect structure. A positive clone was designated pBS114 (FIG. 2).

Example 2--Construction Of Control Expression VectorsContaining DNA Sequences Encoding Wild-TypeGlucagon and Des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !-glucagon

A. Construction of pBS117

A control expression plasmid was constructedwhich encoded a wild-type glucagon coding sequence. Theglucagon coding sequence was designed to utilize codonsfound in highly expressed yeast genes, which would yieldthe greatest variety of amino acid replacements fromsingle base changes, while excluding codons that were onebase change away from the chain termination codons UAA,UAG and UGA. In addition, three restriction sites weredesigned into the sequence to allow confirmation ofmutagenesis and to ease subsequent manipulations. Thiscoding sequence (FIG. 3; Sequence ID No. 1) was used asthe basis for the construction of both the glucagon analogoligonucleotide library and the des-His.sup.1 -glucagonoligonucleotide library.

The glucagon coding sequence was prepared fromtwo synthetic oligonucleotides that were designed toprovide, when annealed, a DNA sequence including aglucagon coding sequence as described above flanked bysequences that allow directional insertion into theexpression vector such that the 5' end of the glucagoncoding sequence is joined in frame to the alpha factorprepro sequence via a DNA segment encoding a KEX2 cleavagesite. Oligonucleotides ZC3020 and ZC3021 (Table 1, Sequence ID Nos. 8 and 9) were designed to form, whenannealed, an adapter encoding the amino acid sequence forwild type glucagon as described above, flanked on the 5' end with a Hind III adhesive end followed by a 15 basebridging sequence between the Hind III site and a KEX2 cleavage site sequence, and on the 3' end with a stopcodon at the end of the glucagon sequence followed by anEco RI site and a Bgl II adhesive end. OligonucleotidesZC3020 and ZC3021 were annealed and ligated with pSB114,which had been linearized by digestion with Hind III andBgl II. The resulting plasmid was designated pBS117. Plasmid pBS117 was transformed into Saccharomycescerevisiae strain ZY100 (ade2-101 leu2-3 leu2-112 ura3-52 suc2-D9 gal2 pep4::TPI1p-CAT) to createstrain ZB210. Plasmid pBS114 was transformed into strain ZY100 to createstrain ZB213 as a negative control. Transformants wereinitially selected on -URADS plates (Table 2). Individualtransformant colonies were clonally purified by streakingon -LEUD plates (Table 2).

Table 2

Media Recipes

-LeuThrTrp Amino Acid Mixture 4 g adenine 3 g L-arginine 5 g L-aspartic acid 2 g L-histidine free base 6 g L-isoleucine 4 g L-lysine-mono hydrochloride 2 g L-methionine 6 g L-phenylalanine 5 g L-serine 5 g L-tyrosine 4 g uracil 6 g L-valine Mix all the ingredients and grind with a mortar and pestleuntil the mixture is finely ground. -UraThrTrp Amino Acid Mixture 4 g adenine 3 g L-arginine 5 g L-aspartic acid 2 g L-histidine free base 6 g L-isoleucine 6 L-leucine 4 g L-lysine-mono hydrochloride 2 g L-methionine 6 g L-phenylalanine 5 g L-serine 5 g L-tyrosine 6 g L-valine

Mix all the ingredients and grind with a mortar and pestleuntil the mixture is finely ground.

-LEUD 20 g glucose 6.7 g Yeast Nitrogen Base without amino acids (DIFCOLaboratories Detroit, Mich.) 0.6 g -LeuThrTrp Amino Acid Mixture 18 g Agar

Mix all the ingredients in distilled water. Add distilledwater to a final volume of 1 liter. Autoclave 15 minutes.After autoclaving add 150 mg L-threonine and 40 mgL-tryptophan. Pour plates and allow to solidify.

-LeuTrpThr Liquid Medium 20 g glucose 6.7 g Yeast Nitrogen Base without amino acids (DIFCOLaboratories Detroit, Mich.) 0.6 g -LeuThrTrp Amino Acid Mixture

Mix all the ingredients in distilled water. Add distilledwater to a final volume of 1 liter. Autoclave 15 minutes.After autoclaving add 150 mg L-threonine and 40 mgL-tryptophan.

-URADS 20 g glucose 6.7 g Yeast Nitrogen Base without amino acids (DIFCOLaboratories Detroit, Mich.) 0.6g -UraThrTrp Amino Acid Mixture 182.2 g sorbitol 18 g Agar

Mix all the ingredients in distilled water. Adddistilled water to a final volume of 1 liter. Autoclave15 minutes. After autoclaving add 150 mg L-threonine and40 mg L-tryptophan. Pour plates and allow to solidify.

Strains ZB210 and ZB213 were grown in -LeuTrpThrliquid medium for 40 hours at 30.degree. C. The cultureswere centrifuged for five minutes to clarify the spent media.The spent media were assayed as described in Example 5. When grown to moderate cell densities (2-6 g/l dry wt)culture medium from ZB210 was found to contain theequivalent of from 5-20 mg/ml glucagon as measured byradioimmuno assay.

B. Construction of Plasmid pBS120

A control expression plasmid which encoded ades-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !glucagon coding sequence (describedby Merrifield et al (ibid.)) was constructed from syntheticoligonucleotides. Oligonucleotides ZC3378 and ZC3443 (Table 1, Sequence ID Nos. 10 and 11) were designedto form a DNA sequence including a yeast codon-optimized des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !glucagon coding sequence flanked on the 5' endwith a Hind III adhesive end followed by a 15 basebridging sequence between the Hind III site and a KEX2 cleavage site sequence, and on the 3' end with a stopcodon at the end of the glucagon sequence followed by anEco RI site and a Bgl II adhesive end. ZC3378 is a 107 base oligomer containing the coding sequence forunsubstituted des-His.sup.1 -glucagon and appropriate bridgesequences. ZC3443 is complementary to ZC3378 except forHind III and Bgl II overhangs and a single base change inthe codon for the aspartic acid residue normally found inposition 9 of glucagon. Incorporation of this base changeshould result in a coding sequence for des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !glucagon. Oligonucleotides ZC3378 and ZC3443 wereannealed and ligated with Hind III-Bgl II linearizedpBS114. Transformation of E. coli HB101 with aligationmix of ZC3378, ZC3443, and pBS114 yielded a mixtureof plasmid clones, some encoding des-His.sup.1 -glucagon and someencoding des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !glucagon. One of the latterwas identified by DNA sequencing and designated pBS120. Plasmid pBS120 was transformed into Saccharomycescerevisiae strain ZY100 to create strain ZB216.

Example 3--Construction of a Glucagon AnalogOligonucleotide Library

A glucagon analog oligonucleotide library wasconstructed using an adaptation of the method described byHutchinson et al. (ibid.). Briefly, oligonucleotides weresynthesized using phosphoramidite solutions that had beenpurposely cross contaminated such that the solutions thatnormally contained the pure four phosphoramidite solutionscorresponding to the bases A, G, C, and T were eachcontaminated with small amounts of phosphoramiditescorresponding to all the bases. The cross contaminationwas performed by resuspending 1.0 g of each of the fourphosphoramidites to a concentration of 0.13M by addingthe following amounts of dry acetonitrile to sealedbottles: A, 11.8 ml; G, 12.1 ml; C 12.2 ml; and T,13.7 ml. Three 0.17 ml aliquots were removed from each bottlein turn and were added to each of the other threereagents. Disallowing for the slight amount of backcontamination caused by the sequential nature of thisprocess (the bottles were swirled only after all transferswere made to minimize this phenomenon), the solutions werecalculated to be 0.13M in total phosphoramiditeconcentration and had the compositions shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3______________________________________Compositions of the A*, G*, C* and T* Phosphoramidite Solutions______________________________________A* 95.7% A and 1.43% each G, C, and TG* 95.8% G and 1.4% each A, C, and TC* 95.8% C and 1.4% each A, G, and TT* 96.3% T and 1.23% each A, G, and C.______________________________________

The glucagon analog oligonucleotide library wasdesigned to form, when annealed, a set of DNA segmentsencoding a series of glucagon analogs flanked by sequencesthat allow the insert to be directionally inserted intothe expression vector such that the 5' end of the analogcoding sequence is joined in frame to the alpha factorprepro sequence via a sequence encoding a KEX2 site. Thesense strand of the glucagon analog library wassynthesized as a set of two oligonucleotide pools. Thefirst oligonucleotide pool contained 56 nucleotideoligomers that were synthesized to include, at the 5' end,a 15 nucleotide unmutagenized sequence encoding a Hind IIIadhesive end and a bridging sequence between the Hind IIIsite and the KEX2 cleavage site of the alpha factor preprosequence, followed by 41 nucleotides synthesized with amixture of correct and incorrect phosphoramidites in theratios described above relative to the native glucagonsequence from nucleotide 1 to nucleotide 41 of FIG. 2(Sequence ID No. 1).

The second oligonucleotide pool contained 54 nucleotide oligomers that were synthesized to include oneunmutagenized base at the 3' end followed by 45 nucleotides synthesized with a mixture of correct andincorrect phosphoramidites using the ratios describedabove relative to the native glucagon sequence fromnucleotide 43 to 87 of FIG. 3 (Sequence ID No. 1),followed by an eight nucleotide unmutagenized sequence atthe 5' end encoding a stop codon followed by a sequenceencoding Eco RI and Bgl II restriction sites. Given thenumbers of A, G, C, and T residues and the contaminationlevels calculated above, the aggregate base substitutionrate was calculated to be 4.1% with an average of 3.52 base substitutions per coding sequence.

Following deprotection and purification of theoligonucleotides by conventional methods, the secondoligonucleotide pool was treated with ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase to add a phosphate group to the 5' ends of the oligomers. Equimolar amounts of botholigonucleotide pools were then mixed, annealed to theantisense oligonucleotide ZC3021 (Table 1; Sequence IDNumber 9), and the resulting adapters were isolated.Plasmid pBS114 was linearized by digestion with Hind IIIand Bgl II and was gel purified. The isolatedoligonucleotide adapters were ligated to the linearizedpBS114, and the ligation mixture was transformed intoelectroporation-competent E. coli strain DH10B.TM. cells(GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) using a BioRadelectroporation unit (BioRad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.).Transformants were selected on LB plates containingampicillin.

Plasmid DNA prepared from fifty transformantswas analyzed by restriction enzyme digestion to determinethe proportion of clones with inserts and to estimatemutation frequency. All fifty plasmids contained inserts.The mutation frequency was estimated by digesting witheither Asp 718 or a mixture of Pst I and Xho I. Becausethe unmutagenized sequence included both an Asp 718 and anXho I site, a subset of the mutations found in the poolcould be detected as a shift in the digestion pattern ofthe plasmid DNA. Seven of the fifty clones lacked the XhoI site present in the wild-type sequence and three lackedthe Asp 718 site. Given the contamination level of eachbase, the distribution of bases in Asp 718 and Xho I sitesand the fact that base substitutions in the pool should becorrected by excision repair when cloned into E. coli (each base substitution was paired with the wild typebase), 6 clones lacking Asp 718 sites and six lackingXho I sites were expected in the fifty clones tested. Theobserved numbers are not significantly different fromthese predictions, but may indicate a slightly loweroverall frequency of mutagenesis than expected.

The mutation frequency was also measured bydetermining the DNA sequence of the glucagon coding regionof twelve clones selected at random. Thus a total of 1032 (86.times.12) mutagenized bases were examined for mutation.Twenty-eight base changes were found, for an overall rateof 2.7%. This is somewhat higher than expected (2.1%)given the base substitution rate and 50:50 chance ofexcision repair, but is probably not statisticallysignificant. The distribution of the mutations among thetwelve sequences was such that two of the sequences werewild type, three had a single base change, four had threemutations, two had four mutations and one had five. Usingthe Poisson distribution and the observed average of 2.3 mutations per coding sequence one would expect codingsequences with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mutations to occurwith the frequencies of 9.7%, 22.5%, 26.7%, 24.2%, 13.3%and 6.3% respectively. The observed numbers arereasonably consistent with these predictions except thatclones with 0 or >2 mutations may be overrepresented.This may reflect the fact that the excision repair processuses one strand as template for a segment of DNA ratherthan correcting individual mismatched bases.

The remainder of the DH10B.TM. transformants(approx. 10,000 total colonies) were pooled by washingthem off the transformation plates. A portion of theresulting cell suspension was used to inoculate 250 ml ofLB+ampicillin which was incubated at 37.degree. C. overnightin an airbath shaker. Plasmid DNA was prepared from theovernight culture, and the DNA was used to transform S.cerevisiae ZY100 as described above. Colonies wereselected in -URADS (Table 2). Individual URA+ colonieswere streaked onto -LEUD plates (Table 2). One isolatedcolony was selected from each streak and patched onto asecond -LEUD plate in sets of 96 per plate for storage. Atotal of 22 plates of approximately 96 colonies eachwere collected.

Two hundred to three hundred microliters of-LeuTrpThr liquid medium (Table 2) was sterilelytransferred to each well of 96-well microtiter plates.Each well was inoculated with yeast from one of thepatches from the -LEUD plates, and the microtiter plateswere incubated at 30.degree. C. for 40-48 hours to allowfor growthof the yeast. After incubation, the plates werecentrifuged for 5 minutes to clarify the yeast broths.The clarified broths were assayed as described in Example5.

Approximately 5% of the strains that resulted inthe lowest cAMP production were chosen for retest. Thisretest consisted of assaying the effects of culture brothson adenylate cyclase activity in duplicate with andwithout exogenous glucagon as described in Example 5. Broths from strains making active glucagon, such as ZB210, resulted in the stimulation of adenylate cyclase activityeven in the absence of exogenous glucagon, but broths fromstrains making antagonists or inactive glucagon analogsshould provide no stimulation above background. Uponretesting, only one strain, designated P60, consistentlyresulted in less cAMP production than the ZB213 control.FIG. 4 shows the cAMP response of rat liver membranes tothree concentrations of glucagon in the presence ofculture broth from P60 and from the control strains makingdes-His.sup.1 -glucagon and des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !glucagon. FIG. 3shows that P60 is, within experimental error, as good anantagonist as des-His.sup.1 -glucagon. Recovery of the plasmidfrom this yeast strain and subsequent DNA sequenceanalysis showed that the analog expressed by this strainis Ser.sup.4 !-glucagon. The plasmid DNA prepared from theyeast transformant was also used to transform S.cerevisiae strain ZY100 to establish a transformantcontaining a plasmid encoding an analog of known sequence.The ZY100 transformant containing a plasmid encoding Ser.sup.4 !glucagon (P60) was given the isolation numberZB312.

A second round of screening was performed on thelibrary of yeast strains producing glucagon analogs. Tenadditional plates, each containing 96 colonies, werecollected and screened as described above. Values fromdifferent experiments were normalized according to theresponses observed with control strains (ZB210 and ZB213).All 960 clones were ranked according to antagonistactivity, and those with cAMP values lower than ZB213 werechosen for rescreening. Rescreening was performed bygrowing fresh cultures and assaying the culture broths induplicate adenylate cyclase assays in the presence of 5 nMglucagon. The results of the duplicate assays wereaveraged and again compared to the value obtained withZB213. This time, only 14 strains had improved activityrelative to the control. These 14 strains were thenassayed in an experiment similar to that described abovefor P60 wherein culture broths from the strains wereassayed in the presence of 0, 4, and 8 nM glucagon. Fourof the 14 strains yielded values that were not significantlydifferent from those obtained with ZB213 and were removedfrom further consideration. Plasmids were recovered fromthe ten remaining strains and were subjected to DNA sequenceanalysis. Plasmid DNA prepared for sequence analysis wasthen transformed into strain ZY100. These transformantswere given identification numbers to signify that theycontained plasmid DNA encoding glucagon antagonists ofknown sequence. The sequence analysis showed that twostrains contained identical mutant glucagons, leaving anadditional nine independent clones: ZB315, ZB316, ZB317, ZB318, ZB319, ZB320, ZB321, ZB322 andZB323 correspondingto BB25, BB64, BB65, FF21, FF30, FF93, HH33, CC29 andHH63, respectively (Table

TABLE 4______________________________________Glucagon AntagonistsScreen Isolation GlucagonNumber Number Antagonist______________________________________D28 ZB300 des-His.sup.1 - Glu9-Phe.sup.13 !glucagonE5 ZB301 des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.4 !glucagonF59 ZB302 des-His.sup.1 - Thr.sup.2 !glucagonG56 ZB303 des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.4 !glucagonG60 ZB304 des-His.sup.1 - Asn.sup.9 -Phe.sup.13 !glucagonG68 ZB305 des-His.sup.1 - Pro.sup.3 -Ser.sup.29 !glucagonH21 ZB306 des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.9 !glucagonH33* ZB307 des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.21 !glucagonI1 ZB308 des-His.sup.1 - Ile.sup.7 !glucagonJ15 ZB309 des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.11 !glucagonJ36 ZB310 des-His.sup.1 - Asn.sup.9 !glucagonJ95 ZB311 des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.2 !glucagonP60 ZB312 Ser.sup.4 glucagonD16 ZB313 des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.21 -Ser.sup.29 !glucagonF73** ZB314 des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.29 !glucagonBB25 ZB315 Cys.sup.2 !glucagonBB64 ZB316 His.sup.3 -Ser.sup.4 !glucagonBB65 ZB317 Asp.sup.1 -Ala.sup.2 -Ile.sup.7 !glucagonFF21 ZB318 Pro.sup.2 !glucagonFF30 ZB319 Asp.sup.4 -Ser.sup.5 !glucagonFF93 ZB320 Asn.sup.10 -Tyr.sup.21 !glucagonHH33 ZB321 des-Arg.sup.18,19 - Leu.sup.1 -Leu.sup.6 -Asn.sup.13 - Thr.sup.16 !glucagonCC29 ZB322 des-.sup.26-29 - Leu.sup.16 -Gly.sup.21 -Ser.sup.22 - Arg.sup.25 !glucagonHH63*** ZB323 Gly.sup.23 !glucagonK41 ZB324 des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 -His.sup.24 !glucagonK93 ZB325 des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.5 !glucagon084 ZB326 des-His.sup.1 - Asn.sup.9 -Leu.sup.27 !glucagonM28 ZB327 des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.4 -Ala.sup.29 !glucagonM14 ZB328 des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 -Ala.sup.11 !glucagon______________________________________ *The glucagon antagonist produced by ZB307 is identical to the antagonist produced by B6. **The glucagon antagonist produced by ZB314 is identical to the antagonis produced by D45. ***The glucagon antagonist produced by ZB323 includes the Cterminal extension GluPhe-Arg-Ser-Arg-Tyr-Leu-Glu-Thr-Lys-Ile-Asn-Ile-Ile-Ile SEQ ID NO. 12!-

Example 4--Construction of a Des-His.sup.1 -glucagonAnalog Oligonucleotide Library

A des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analog oligonucleotidelibrary was constructed similarly to the glucagon analogoligonucleotide library described in Example 3 except thatboth strands were mutagenized. A set of four syntheticoligonucleotide pools were designed to provide a series ofDNA sequences encoding des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analogs flankedby sequences that allow directional insertion into theexpression vector such that the 5' end of the analogcoding sequence is joined in frame to the alpha factorprepro sequence via a KEX2 cleavage site sequence.

The antisense strand of the des-His.sup.1 -glucagonanalog library was prepared as a set of two pools ofoligonucleotides. The first oligonucleotide poolcontained 61 nucleotide oligomers that were synthesizedto include, from the 3' end, an eleven nucleotideunmutagenized sequence complementary to a sequencebridging the Hind III site of the alpha factor preprosequence and a KEX2 cleavage site sequence, followed by 50 nucleotides synthesized with a mixture of correct andincorrect phosphoramidites in a 97:1:1:1 ratio relative tothe antisense strand of the native glucagon sequence, fromnucleotide 4 to nucleotide 53 of FIG. 2 (Sequence IDNos. 1 and 2).

The second oligonucleotide pool contained 46 nucleotide oligomers that were synthesized to include oneunmutagenized base at the 3' end followed by 33 nucleotides synthesized with a mixture of correct andincorrect phosphoramidites in a 97:1:1:1 ratio relative tothe antisense strand of the native glucagon sequence fromnucleotide 55 to nucleotide 87 of FIG. 3 (Sequence IDNo. 1), followed by a 12 nucleotide unmutagenized sequenceat the 5' end, which contained a sequence complementary toa stop codon followed by a sequence containing Eco RI andBgl II restriction sites.

The sense strand of the des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analoglibrary was also prepared as a set of two pools ofoligonucleotide sequences. The first oligonucleotide poolcontained 54 nucleotide oligomers which were synthesizedto include a 20 nucleotide unmutagenized sequenceincluding a 5' Hind III adhesive end followed by thesequence between the Hind III site and the KEX2 cleavagesite sequence of the alpha factor prepro sequence,followed by 38 nucleotides synthesized with a mixture ofcorrect and incorrect phosphoramidites in a 97:1:1:1 ratiorelative to the native glucagon sequence from nucleotide 4 to nucleotide 41 of FIG. 3 (Sequence ID No. 1).

The second oligonucleotide pool contained 46 nucleotide oligomers which were synthesized to include oneunmutagenized base at the 3' end followed by 45 nucleotides synthesized with a mixture of correct andincorrect phosphoramidites in a 97:1:1:1 ratio relative tothe native glucagon sequence from nucleotide 43 to 87 ofFIG. 3 (Sequence ID No. 1), followed by an 8 nucleotideunmutagenized sequence at the 5' end, which included astop codon followed by Eco RI and Bgl II restrictionsites.

The four oligonucleotide pools were annealed,ligated and transformed as described in Example 3. Theresulting des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analog oligonucleotide librarywas transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain ZY100 and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae library was prepared asdescribed above.

One isolate from the des-His.sup.1 -glucagon pool wassequenced and confirmed to encode des-His.sup.1 -glucagon. Thisplasmid was transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain ZY100 to create the strain ZB117. Strain ZB117wasused as the control strain for producing unmodified des-His.sup.1 -glucagon.

Approximately 900 individual yeast clonestransformed with pooled plasmid DNA from the des-His.sup.1 -glucagonoligonucleotide library were screened asdescribed in Example 3. Broth from approximately 35% ofthese yeast clones resulted in reduced cAMP production ascompared to the ZB213 (no glucagon) control. However,since des-His.sup.1 -glucagon is itself a weak antagonist, morestringent screening criteria were used. Clones whichproduced des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analogs that reduced theproduction of cAMP more than one standard deviation belowthe average amount (approximately 20% of the total) wereselected for rescreening. The rescreened broths wereassayed in duplicate, and the results were averaged.Approximately one quarter of these rescreened clones,which consistently produced des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analogs thatproduced less adenyl cyclase activity stimulation than thedes-His.sup.1 -glucagon producing control strain ZB217, wereselected for further analysis. Plasmid DNA was preparedfrom yeast strains selected for further analysis asdescribed above. The plasmid DNA was subjected to DNAsequence analysis and was used to transform S. cerevisiae strain ZY100. The transformants containing plasmidsencoding glucagon antagonists of known sequence were givenisolation numbers (Table 4).

A second round of screening was performed on themutant des-His.sup.1 -glucagon analog library as describedabove. Five additional clones, given isolation numbersZB324 through ZB328 (Table 4), were identified asproducing glucagon analogs producing less adenyl cyclasestimulation than the des-His.sup.1 -glucagon producing controlstrain ZB217.

Further experiments included the type ofresponse curve described in Example 5 wherein yeast brothis used to inhibit the response of hepatocyte membraneadenylate cyclase to three concentrations of glucagon. Atleast ten yeast clones producing glucagon analogs that aremore effective antagonists than des-His.sup.1 -glucagon wereidentified in these experiments. When the amount of yeastbroth used was normalized to its immunoreactivity in aglucagon radioimmuno assay, several clones appeared tomake antagonists that are even more effective than thedes-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !-glucagon analog made by ZB216.Theseantagonists are identified in Table 5. FIG. 4 shows thecAMP response of rat liver membranes to threeconcentrations of glucagon in the presence of culturebroth from B6 and J15 and from the control strains makingdes-His.sup.1 -glucagon and des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !glucagon.FIG. 4shows that B6 and J15 are better antagonists relative toboth des-His.sup.1 -glucagon and des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 !glucagon.

TABLE 5

des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.21 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.11 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Pro.sup.3 -Ser.sup.29 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Ile.sup.7 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.9 -Phe.sup.13 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.29 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Asn.sup.9 -Phe.sup.13 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.9 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.21 -Ser.sup.29 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Asn.sup.9 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.4 ! glucagon des-His.sup.1 - Thr.sup.2 ! glucagon

Example 5--Glucagon Antagonist Screening Assay

A. Preparation of Rat Liver Membranes

Young female Sprague-Dawley rats were used forthe preparation of liver membranes using the methodessentially described by Neville (ibid.) and modified byPohl et al. (ibid). Ten to 15 rats yielding 60-100 grams of liver were processed per batch. After the rats wereeuthanized by cervical dislocation, their livers weresurgically removed and transferred, as quickly aspossible, to an iced beaker. Scissors were used to mincethe tissue into pieces approximately 3-6 mm in size. Anyconnective tissue that was present was removed.

The minced tissue was suspended in ice cold 1 mMsodium bicarbonate at a concentration of approximately300 g/l. This suspension was processed in batches in atissue homogenizer with eight strokes of the loose pestle.The homogenate was mixed with additional ice cold 1 mMsodium bicarbonate to yield a final concentration of about40-80 g/l. After stirring the diluted homogenate for atleast three minutes, it was filtered through a doublelayer of cheese cloth. The filtrate was refilteredthrough four layers of cheese cloth, transferred tocentrifuge bottles and centrifuged at 1500.times. g for 30 minutes at 4.degree. C.

After centrifugation, as much of the supernatantas possible was carefully decanted and discarded, and thepellets were gently resuspended in the remainingsupernatant with three strokes of the loose pestle in aclean tissue homogenizer. The volume of the resuspendedsupernatant was adjusted to 72 ml with water, and 93 ml of69% (w/w) sucrose was added to yield 165 ml of membranesuspension in 44% sucrose. After thorough mixing, thesucrose concentration was measured with a refractometerand adjusted to between 43.9% and 44.1% sucrose(corresponding to a refractive index between 1.4076 and1.4080) with either 69% sucrose or water. The adjustedsuspension was distributed into six 1".times.3.5" cellulose nitrate tubes, and the tubes were filled and balanced byoverlaying with a fresh sucrose solution which had beenadjusted to a concentration between 42.2% and 42.4%sucrose (corresponding to a refractive index between1.4042 and 1.4046). The samples were centrifuged in aBeckman SW28 swinging bucket ultracentrifuge rotor at25,000 rpm for 150 minutes at 4.degree. C.

The purified membranes were recovered as a layerfloating at the top meniscus of the tubes. The membraneswere scooped out with a spoon-shaped spatula or wereremoved by suction into a syringe through an 18-gaugeneedle. The membranes were resuspended in 10 ml of 1 mMbicarbonate by suction and expulsion from a 10-25 mlsyringe through an 18-gauge or 20-gauge needle. Followingresuspension, the membranes were washed by adding 60-80 mlof 1 mM bicarbonate and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm in ahigh speed centrifuge. The supernatants were discarded,and the pellets were resuspended in 1 mM bicarbonate andpooled to yield approximately 5-10 ml of concentratedhepatocyte membranes. The membrane preparation wasaliquoted and was stored frozen at -80.degree. C. for up tosix months.

The protein concentration of the membranepreparation was determined by diluting 10-20 .mu.l of themembrane preparation 100-fold in 1M NaCl, 0.17Msodium phosphate (pH 7.0) buffer. The absorbance of thissolution relative to the buffer was measured in 1 cmquartz cuvettes at 224 nm and 236.5 nm wave length in aUV spectrophotometer. Protein concentration was calculatedaccording to the formula:

A.sub.224 nm -A.sub.236.5 nm =(mg/ml protein) (6.45) (100) B. Adenylate cyclase reaction:

The adenylate cyclase assay was carried out byfirst adding 5 .mu.l of sample (e.g. yeast broth) containingpotential inhibitors at micromolar concentrations to eachwell of a 96-well microtiter plate. An A+B solution wasprepared by mixing 2.5 ml of Solution A (Table 6) with2.5 ml of Solution B (Table 6). Fifty microliters of the A+Bsolution was added to each "no glucagon" control well.Glucagon was added from the "G" solution to the remainingA+B solution to a concentration of 1.times.10.sup.-8 M (thisresults in a final assay concentration of 5.times.10.sup.-9).Fifty microliters of the A+B+glucagon solution was addedto each well, excluding the "no glucagon" controls. Themembrane preparation was diluted to approximately 2 mg/mlprotein with water. The reaction was started by theaddition of 45 .mu.l of diluted membrane to each well, inorder. The assays were incubated for 12 minutes at roomtemperature, and were stopped by the addition of 100 .mu.l ofStop Mix to each well in the same order that the dilutedmembrane was added. The assay mixtures were clarified bycentrifugation, and the assays were stored at 4.degree. C.

Table 6

Reagent Recipes

Solution A 100 mM Tris HCl pH 7.6 20 mM MgCl.sub.2 0.4% BSA 4 mg/ml Creatine Phosphokinase (Sigma Chemical Company) Solution B 4 mM ATP 20 mM GTP 4 mM isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine (IBX; Sigma ChemicalCo.) 4 mM EDTA 120 mM Creatine Phosphate "G" 1 mM glucagon Stop Mix 100 mM Acetic acid 50 mM EDTA C. Cyclic AMP Assay

Cyclic AMP concentrations were determined usingan Amersham Scintillation Proximity Assay Kit (Amersham,Arlington Heights, Ill.). Briefly, 10 .mu.l from eachadenylate cyclase reaction was added to individual betaplate wells. Each sample was diluted with 65 .mu.l of 50 mM Na Acetate. Cyclic AMP standards were prepared at 0.0,1.6 and 6.4.times.10.sup.-9 M or may be prepared from the"non-standards" supplied with Amersham kit.Triplicate standards of 75 .mu.l of each standard were addedto individual beta plate wells. Nonspecific binding (NSB)controls were prepared by adding 150 .mu.l of 50 mM NaAcetate to triplicate beta plate wells. Seventy-fivemicroliters of .sup.125 I-cAMP (approx. 0.45 mCi/ml) was addedto each well, followed by the addition of 75 .mu.l of dilutedrabbit anti-succinyl cAMP antiserum (diluted permanufacturer's instruction in 50 mM Na Acetate) to eachwell, excluding the NSB controls. Seventy-fivemicroliters of diluted anti-rabbit SPA reagent was thenadded to each well, and the plates were sealed andincubated, with shaking, overnight at room temperature.The plates were counted for one minute per sample in abeta-plate counter. Mean counts were computed for the NSBcontrols and the standards. The percent response for thestandards and samples was determined using the formula:

%R.sub.X =(CPM-CPM.sub.NSB)/(CPM.sub.0.0 -CPM.sub.NSB) where %R.sub.X =Percent response for a givensample or standard CPM=Sample counts CPM.sub.NSB =Mean NSB control counts CPM.sub.0.0 =Mean 0.0M standard counts The relative concentration of cAMP for a given sample wasdetermined using the formula: cAMP!.sub.x =1.6 e.sup.ln4(%Rx-%R1.6)/(%R6.4-%R1.6) where cAMP!.sub.x =the relative concentration of agiven sample %Rx=Percent response for a givensample %R1.6=Percent response for the 1.6.times.10.sup.-9 M standard %R6.4=Percent response for a the 6.4.times.10.sup.-9 M standard

Potential antagonists were identified as thosewhich inhibited the stimulation of the rat liver membraneadenylate cyclase by glucagon. Thus, assay wells thatcontained significantly less cAMP than wells containingbroth from a control strain that does not produce glucagon(ZB213) should correspond to yeast strains that produceglucagon analogs with antagonist activity. Because of arelatively high degree of variability in the valuesobtained for control and mutant strains, an average cAMPvalue was computed for all samples on a given plate, andthose yeast strains which corresponded to valuessignificantly less than this average were selected forfurther study.

Example 6--Synthetic Peptide Glucagon Antagonists

The peptides Ser.sup.4 !glucagon, des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.4 !glucagon, des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.21 !glucagon,des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.29 !glucagon, des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.11 !glucagon and Asp.sup.1 -Ala.sup.2 -Ile.sup.7 !glucagonwere synthesized on an Applied Biosystems(Foster City, Calif.) Model 431A peptide synthesizer usingstandard cycles as directed by the manufacturer and Fmocchemistry essentially as described by Carpino and Han (J.Amer. Chem Soc. 92:5748-5749, 1970; J. Org. Chem. 37:3404-3409, 1972). An unloaded HMP (p-alkyloxybenzylalcohol) resin was used. The first amino acid was coupledto the resin as a symmetric anhydride. Subsequent aminoacids were coupled as HOBt active esters. After eachcoupling, a capping cycle with acetic anhydride was run tominimize the occurrence of deletion peptides. When thesynthesis was complete, the final Fmoc protecting groupwas removed and the resin dried. During synthesis, aresin sample was taken after each coupling. Samples wereassayed as directed by the manufacturer. The first samplewas used to test the efficiency of the resin loading. Theefficiency of coupling was assayed using a ninhydrinassay. Peptides were cleaved from the resin using 95%trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), precipitated in diethyl etherand redissolved in 10% acetic acid. Peptides werepurified by reverse-phase HPLC using a Vydac C-4 column(The Separations Group, Hesperia, Calif.) with aH.sub.2 O/acetonitrile (both containing 0.1% TFA) gradient.For each peptide, the main peak was collected, a sample wastaken for amino acid analysis, and the peptide waslyophilized.

The peptides were dissolved in water at 1 mMconcentration based upon a molar extinction coefficient of8290 at a wavelength of 278 nm. Serial dilution in waterthen provided a range of concentrations that could betested for effects on adenylate cyclase activity asdescribed in Example 5. Peptides were tested alone and inthe presence of 20 nm glucagon. Only Ser.sup.4 !glucagonshowed stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity in theabsence of added glucagon, and this stimulation was slightand occurred only at the highest concentration assayed (10 .mu.M final in the reaction mixture). All the syntheticanalogs (including Ser.sup.4 !glucagon) were able toeffectively inhibit the response to glucagon in a dose-dependentmanner. Data from these experiments were usedto estimate an inhibition coefficient (I/A.sub.50) for each ofthese analogs as shown in Table 7. I/A.sub.50 is defined asthe ratio of inhibitor to agonist concentration whereinthe response is reduced to one-half of that observed withthe agonist

TABLE 7______________________________________Analog (I/A.sub.50)______________________________________ Ser.sup.4 ! glucagon 35des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.4 !glucagon 25des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.11 !glucagon 18des-His.sup.1 - Glu.sup.21 !glucagon 22des-His.sup.1 - Ser.sup.29 !glucagon 30 Asp.sup.1 -Ala.sup.2 -Ile.sup.7 !glucagon 25______________________________________

Example 7--Synthesis of glucagon antagonists

A. Peptide synthesis

The synthetic peptide des-His.sup.1 -(Ala.sup.2,11 -Glu.sup.21)glucagon amide was synthesized using tBoc-protectedamino acids and the method of Barany and Merrifield(ibid.). Synthesis was carried out on an AppliedBiosystems (Foster City, Calif.) 430A peptide synthesizerusing DMF/dichloromethane as solvents for the couplingreactions following the standard protocol for the machine.Protection groups were used as shown in Table 8. Thepeptide was cleaved from the resin using the low/high HFprocedure disclosed by Tam et al. (J. Am. Chem. Soc.

TABLE 8______________________________________Amino Acid Protection Group______________________________________Arg TosAsp OBzlGlu OBzlLys Cl-ZMet OSer BzlThr BzlTrp CHOTyr Br-Z______________________________________

The crude peptide was purified by preparativeHPLC by dissolving 35 mg of crude peptide in 15 ml of0.01MHCl, loading the solution on a SUPERPAC PEP-S RP-C2/C18 column (Pharmacia LKB, Alleroed, Denmark) and eluted witha gradient of acetonitrile in 0.01M HCl starting at 20%acetonitrile and increasing to 50% acetonitrile over 40 minutes at a flow rate of 15 ml/minute. UV detection wasat 280 nm.

The purified peptide was treated with 0.1Mpiperidine for 15 minutes at 20.degree. C. to removeresidual CHOprotection from the tryptophan residue. The reactionmixture was then loaded on a Waters SEP-PAK C-18 cartridge(Struers, Roedovre, Denmark). The peptides were elutedwith 10 ml 2% acetic acid and 10 ml 40%acetonitrile in 2%acetic acid. The acetonitrile-containing fractions werelyophilized. After lyophilization, the identity of thepeptide was verified by plasma desorption massspectrometry. Final yield was 12.1 mg.

B. Glucagon binding assay

The ability of the synthetic peptides to inhibitglucagon binding was determined by measuring the bindingof radiolabeled glucagon in the presence of syntheticpeptide relative to the binding of radiolabeled glucagonin the absence of the synthetic peptides. The syntheticpeptides were dissolved in 10% acetic acid and lyophilizedbefore use. Glucagon was dissolved in 10% acetic acid andlyophilized in 25-.mu.g portions for use as standards. .sup.125 I-glucagonwith a specific activity of 11.1 kBq/ng wasobtained from Novo Biolabs (Novo Alle, Bagsvaerd, Denmark)and stored at -18.degree. C. Plasma membranes were prepared aspreviously described, except protein detemination wascarried out using a Bio-Rad Protein Assay (BioRad,Richmond, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's directionsusing bovine serum albumin as a standard. Milli-Q gradewater was used throughout.

The lyophilized glucagon and synthetic peptideswere dissolved in 100 .mu.l of 0.05M HCl, left for 3 minutes. The glucagon was diluted with buffer (2.5% humanserum albumin Grade 5, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.! in 0.1M HEPES, 0.15M NaCl, pH 7.4) to 0.2-200ng/ml.The synthetic peptides were diluted with the same bufferto 1.5-800 ng/ml. For each 96-well assay plate,duplicate samples of glucagon and triplicate samples ofeach of the peptides were assayed. Each cell of a 96-well0.45 .mu.m filter hydrophilic microtiter plate (MultiscreenFiltration System, Millipore) contained 100 .mu.l of sample,25 .mu.l (ca. 30,000 cpm) .sup.125 I-glucagon diluted indilutionbuffer described above and 25 .mu.l of freshly thawed plasmamembrane containing 10-20 .mu.g of plasma membrane protein.The plates were shaken for ten seconds at roomtemperature, followed by a 30 minute incubation at 30.degree. C. Unbound peptides were then separated by vacuum filtrationusing a Millipore Multiscreen vacuum manifold (Millipore).The plates were washed once with 150 .mu.l of the dilutionbuffer described above and the plates were left to dry forseveral hours whereafter filters were separated from theplates using a Millipore puncher (Multiscreen Punch kit,Millipore). The filters were counted in a gamma counter.The binding of des-His.sup.1 -(Ala.sup.2,11 -Glu.sup.21)glucagonamide wasshown to be 84%.+-.9.3.

C. Adenylate Cyclase Assay

Liver plasma membranes for use in adenylatecyclase assays were prepared essentially as described byNeville et al. (ibid.). Twenty rats were euthanized bydecapitation, and the livers were removed and cooled to4.degree. C. After cooling, the livers were maintained at 4.degree. C.during the membrane preparation. Three volumes of media(1 mM NaHCO.sub.3, 0.5 mM CaCl.sub.2) were added to thelivers andthe liver tissue was roughly minced with scissors. Thematerial was divided into two parts and each part washomogenized for thirty seconds in a Waring-type blender atfull speed. After homogenization, the homogenates weretransferred to a sieve with a 1.5 mm pore size. Thehomogenates were strained with a ladle. The strainingprocedure was repeated for each homogenate through a finerscreen. The strained homogenates were combined and mediawas added to a final volume of one liter. The homogenatewas homgenized with a Dounce homogenizer using eightvigourous strokes of the loose pestle. The homogenateswere filtered through four layers of cheese cloth. Thestrained homogenates were centrifuged at approximately 150.times. g in a swinging bucket rotor for 20 minutes at 4.degree. C.The supernatant was discarded and the precipitate wasresuspended in 500 ml of media and homogenized in a Douncehomogenizer with three strokes of a loose pestle. Thecentrifugation was repeated and the resulting precipitatewas resuspended in 250 ml media. The homogenate wascentrifuged as described and the precipitate was suspendedin 50 to 100 ml of media. The homogenate was homogenizedin a Dounce homogenizer the three strokes of the loosepestle. Sucrose from a 69% sucrose solution was added tothe suspention to a final sucrose concentration of 44.0.+-.0.1%. The solution was centrifuged in anultracentrifuge at approximately 100,000 g for 150 minutes. The membranes were removed from the top of thetube with a spoon. The membranes were stored at -80.degree. C.

Adenylate cyclase assays were carried out usingsynthetic peptides. Antagonsists were those peptides thatreduced the level of cAMP response. Twenty-fivemicroliters of each peptide solution, prepared asdescribed above for the binding assay, was added toindividual wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. Fiftymicroliters of incubation mixture (0.1% human serumalbumin Grade 5, Sigma!, 15 mM MgCl.sub.2, 1 mM ATP, 0.9 mMIBMX (3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine, Sigma), 15 mMcreatinephosphate and 5 mg/ml creatine phosphokinase in 50 mMTris-HCl, pH 7.4) was added to each well. The reactionwas initiated by the addition of 25 .mu.l of freshly thawedplasma membrane prepared as described above containing0.5-2.0 .mu.g of plasma membrane protein. The plates wereincubated at 30.degree. C. for 15 minutes. Following theincubation, the reaction was stopped by heating the platesto 80.degree.-90.degree. C. for three minutes. All samples werediluted five-fold with RIA buffer from the Amersham ScintillationProximity Assay kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.).Cyclic AMP was measured using an Amersham ScintillationProximity Assay kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.).The results from these assays showed that the inhibitioncoefficient of the peptide was 8.0.+-.2.1 as compared todes-His.sup.1 glucagon which exhibited an inhibition coefficientof 27.

From the foregoing it will be appreciated that,although specific embodiments of the invention have beendescribed herein for purposes of illustration, variousmodifications may be made without deviating from thespirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, theinvention is not limited except as by the appended

__________________________________________________________________________SEQUENCE LISTING(1) GENERAL INFORMATION:(iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 12(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:1:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 87 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: double(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: cDNA(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: CDS(B) LOCATION: 1..87(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:1:CACTCTCAAGGTACCTTTACCTCTGACTACTCTAAGTATCTAGACTCG48HisSerGlnGlyThrPheThrSerAspTyrSerLysTyrLeuAspSer151015AGGCGTGCTCAAGACTTTGTTCAATGGTTGATGAATACC87ArgArgAlaGlnAspPheValGlnTrpLeuMetAsnThr2025(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 29 amino acids(B) TYPE: amino acid(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2:HisSerGlnGlyThrPheThrSerAspTyrSerLysTyrLeuAspSer151015ArgArgAlaGlnAspPheValGlnTrpLeuMetAsnThr2025(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 20 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3:TTGTCCAAGCTTACACCTTC20(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 82 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:4:AGCTTGGACAAGAGAGTTGTTTCTCACTTCAACGACTGTCCAGACCCTCACACCCAATTC60TGTTTCCACGGTACCTGTACAT82(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 85 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5:TCTTGGTTCAAGAAGACAAGCCAGCATGCGTTTGTCACTCTGGTTACGTTGGTGCTAGAT60GTGAACACGCTGTGTTGGCTTAAAT85(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 85 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:6:TCTTGGTTCAAGAAGACAAGCCAGCATGCGTTTGTCACTCTGGTTACGTTGGTGCTAGAT60GTGAACACGCTGTGTTGGCTTAAAT85(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 86 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7:CTAGATTTAAGCCAACAAGTCAGCGTGTTCACATCTAGCACCAACGTAACCAGAGTGACA60AACGCATGCTGGCTTGTCTTCTTGAA86(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:8:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 110 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:8:AGCTTAGATAAGAGACACTCTCAAGGTACCTTTACCTCTGACTACTCTAAGTATCTAGAC60TCGAGGCGTGCTCAAGACTTTGTTCAATGGTTGATGAATACCTGAATTCA110(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:9:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 110 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:9:GATCTGAATTCAGGTATTCATCAACCATTGAACAAAGTCTTGAGCACGCCTCGAGTCTAG60ATACTTAGAGTAGTCAGAGGTAAAGGTACCTTGAGAGTGTCTCTTATCTA110(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:10:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 107 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:10:AGCTTAGATAAGAGATCTCAAGGTACCTTTACCTCTGACTACTCTAAGTATCTAGACTCG60AGGCGTGCTCAAGACTTTGTTCAATGGTTGATGAATACCTGAATTCA107(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:11:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 107 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:11:GATCTGAATTCAGGTATTCATCAACCATTGAACAAAGTCTTGAGCACGCCTCGAGTCTAG60ATACTTAGAGTATTCAGAGGTAAAGGTACCTTGAGATCTCTTATCTA107(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:12:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 15 amino acids(B) TYPE: amino acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:12:GluPheArgSerArgTyrLeuGluThrLysIleAsnIleIleIle151015

Claims

1. A glucagon antagonist which is a substituted glucagon having an alanine at position 2 and which additionally has an amino acid substitution at position 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 21 or 29.

2. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 1 having an alanine residue at position 11.

3. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 2 having a glutamate residue at position 21.

4. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 1 having a glutamate residue at position 21.

5. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 1 having a serine residue at position 29.

6. A glucagon antagonist which comprise a des-His.sup.1 - Ala.sup.2 !glucagon.

7. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 6 having an amino acid substitution at position 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 21 or 29.

8. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 6 having an alanine residue at position 11.

9. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 8 having a glutamate residue at position 21.

10. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 6 having a glutamate residue at position 21.

11. A glucagon antagonist according to claim 6 having a serine residue at position 21.

12. Des-His.sup.1 Ala.sup.2,11 -Glu.sup.21 !glucagon.