Glucose sensor product and related manufacturing and packaging methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9101305
  • Patent Number
    9,101,305
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 9, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 11, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A glucose sensor product is manufactured by a process that maintains the sterility of the glucose sensor while allowing gaseous manufacturing by-products to be vented from the inside of the glucose sensor package. The method begins by placing a glucose sensor assembly into a plastic package tray having a sealing surface surrounding an opening. The method continues by covering the opening with a microbial barrier material such that the microbial barrier material overlies the sealing surface, forming a seal between the sealing surface and the microbial barrier material, resulting in a sealed package tray containing the glucose sensor assembly, and sterilizing the glucose sensor assembly inside the sealed package tray. The microbial barrier material maintains sterility of the glucose sensor assembly while allowing volatile by-products outgassed from the glucose sensor assembly and the plastic package tray to pass therethrough.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the subject matter described herein relate generally to medical devices and related packaging techniques. More particularly, embodiments of the subject matter relate to a glucose sensor product and its associated manufacturing and packaging processes.


BACKGROUND

The prior art includes a wide variety of medical devices and components, related manufacturing techniques, and related packaging techniques. For example, sensors are generally known in the art for use in a variety of specialized applications. In this regard, thin film electrochemical sensors are used to test analyte levels in patients. More specifically, thin film sensors have been designed for use in obtaining an indication of blood glucose (BG) levels and monitoring BG levels in a diabetic patient, with the distal segment portion of the sensor positioned subcutaneously in direct contact with patient extracellular fluid. Such readings can be especially useful in adjusting a treatment regimen which typically includes regular administration of insulin to the patient.


A glucose sensor of the type described above may be packaged and sold as a product that includes certain features or components that allow the patient to position and subcutaneously implant the sensor. For example, thin film glucose sensors are often implanted subcutaneously/transcutaneously using an introducer tool, which may be packaged with the glucose sensor. The introducer contains a needle that is used to puncture the skin of a patient at the same time as the sensor is introduced. The needle is then withdrawn, leaving the sensor in the skin of the patient. The introducer, or insertion device, commonly including a needle, is used and then discarded after inserting the sensor at the sensor site.


In practice, glucose sensors are provided in sterile packages, bags, or containers that keep the sensors protected and sterile until they are ready for insertion. During manufacturing, a glucose sensor is inserted into the desired package, which usually forms an airtight seal around the glucose sensor to provide the desired amount of protection. Thereafter, the sealed package is subjected to a sterilization procedure. After sterilization, the sealed package is prepared for shipping, boxing, or the like.


BRIEF SUMMARY

An exemplary embodiment of a method of manufacturing a medical device package is presented here. The method involves the fabrication of a medical device assembly. In accordance with the method, the medical device assembly is placed into a package tray. The method continues by sealing the medical device assembly inside the package tray with a gas-permeable sealing material, and sterilizing the medical device assembly inside the sealed package tray. The sealing material maintains sterility of the medical device assembly while allowing volatile substances to vent from inside the sealed package tray to outside the sealed package tray.


Also provided is an exemplary embodiment of a glucose sensor product manufactured by a process that involves the steps of: placing a glucose sensor assembly into a plastic package tray having a sealing surface surrounding an opening; covering the opening with a microbial barrier material such that the microbial barrier material overlies the sealing surface; forming a seal between the sealing surface and the microbial barrier material, resulting in a sealed package tray containing the glucose sensor assembly; and sterilizing the glucose sensor assembly inside the sealed package tray. The microbial barrier material maintains sterility of the glucose sensor assembly while allowing volatile by-products outgassed from the glucose sensor assembly and the plastic package tray to pass therethrough.


An exemplary embodiment of a glucose sensor product is also provided. The glucose sensor product includes a plastic package tray and a glucose sensor assembly in the plastic package tray. The glucose sensor assembly includes an electrochemical sensor with glucose oxidase enzyme, a sensor base formed at least in part from plastic, a sensor mounting pedestal formed at least in part from plastic, and a sensor introducer formed at least in part from plastic. The glucose sensor product also includes a microbial barrier material coupled to the plastic package tray to seal the glucose sensor assembly in the plastic package tray. The microbial barrier material maintains sterility of the glucose sensor assembly while venting substances outgassed from the plastic package tray, the sensor base, the sensor mounting pedestal, and the sensor introducer.


This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete understanding of the subject matter may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in conjunction with the following figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to similar elements throughout the figures.



FIG. 1 is a rear perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of a glucose sensor package;



FIG. 2 is a front perspective view of the glucose sensor package shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the glucose sensor assembly contained in the glucose sensor package shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is an exploded perspective view of the glucose sensor assembly shown in FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 is a front perspective view of the package tray shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a sensor mounting pedestal suitable for use with the glucose sensor assembly shown in FIG. 3; and



FIG. 7 is a flow chart that illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a glucose sensor manufacturing process.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description is merely illustrative in nature and is not intended to limit the embodiments of the subject matter or the application and uses of such embodiments. As used herein, the word “exemplary” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as exemplary is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the following detailed description.


The subject matter described here relates to the manufacturing and packaging of a medical device or a medical component. The non-limiting exemplary embodiment described below relates to a continuous glucose sensor of the type used by diabetic patients. It should be appreciated that the manufacturing and packaging techniques presented here need not be limited to use with glucose sensors and, indeed, the concepts and technology described with reference to a glucose sensor could also be used with other medical devices, other sensor types, other medical components or supplies, and the like.


For the sake of brevity, conventional aspects and technology related to glucose sensors and glucose sensor fabrication may not be described in detail here. In this regard, known and/or conventional aspects of glucose sensors and their manufacturing may be of the type described in, but not limited to: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,892,085 and 7,468,033, and United States patent application number 2009/0299301 (which are incorporated by reference herein).


A glucose sensor of the type described here may be realized as an electrochemical sensor that employs the glucose oxidase enzyme. Sensors that use glucose oxidase to effect a reaction of glucose and oxygen are known, and such glucose sensors will not be described in detail here. Sealed bagging represents one conventional approach for packaging glucose sensors that use the glucose oxidase enzyme. In accordance with this packaging technique, an assembled glucose sensor product is sealed inside of a plastic bag, and the sealed bag is thereafter subjected to a sterilization process. The sealed plastic bag serves as a barrier to microbes and other contaminants. The non-permeable nature of the plastic bag, however, keeps solvents, outgassed substances, and/or other by-products of the manufacturing and sterilization processes trapped inside the plastic bag. For example, plastics, adhesives, and packaging materials may release (outgas) chemicals, solvents, or gases during and after manufacturing, and after the glucose sensor product has been sealed inside the plastic bag. Some trapped substances and gases may have little to no effect on the glucose sensor (more specifically, the glucose oxidase enzyme), while other trapped substances and gases may be volatile in that they might degrade or otherwise interact with the glucose oxidase enzyme in an undesirable manner.


Experiments and empirical data indicate that glucose sensors in sealed plastic bags tend to drift after they have been deployed. In other words, the generated output voltage/current for a given glucose level trends in an escalating manner over time. In addition, sensor signals may also drift downward (loss of signal) over time due to depletion of available enzyme or physical blockage from bodily debris (lipids, bio-film, immune response) or otherwise, while drifting upward can be a result of other instabilities in chemistry processing such as delamination or erosion of the various layers. It is feasible that there are complex interactions not fully understood that can cause drift either upward or downward as a result of sensor packaging and the subsequent interaction of the chemical layers with solvents. To compensate for such drifting, such glucose sensors may need to be calibrated and checked frequently. The hypothesis is that certain substances and gases trapped inside the sealed plastic bags adversely affect the quality and accuracy of the glucose sensors by interacting with the glucose oxidase enzyme. This suggests that a glucose sensor sealed in a plastic bag for a relatively short period of time before use might be more stable than a glucose sensor sealed in a plastic bag for a relatively long period of time before use. The manufacturing and packaging techniques presented here reduce the drift in output observed for glucose sensors in sealed packages.



FIG. 1 is a rear perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of a glucose sensor package 100, and FIG. 2 is a front perspective view of the glucose sensor package 100. The glucose sensor package 100 represents one exemplary form factor that can be used for purposes of boxing, shipping, storing, and distributing glucose sensors that have been manufactured, assembled, and sterilized in accordance with the techniques and processes described here. This particular embodiment of the glucose sensor package 100 generally includes, without limitation: a package tray 102; a glucose sensor assembly 104 (shown in phantom); and a piece of material 106. FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the glucose sensor assembly 104, FIG. 4 is an exploded perspective view of the glucose sensor assembly 104, and FIG. 5 is a front perspective view of the package tray 102.


In certain embodiments the package tray 102 is composed at least in part from a plastic material. For the embodiment described here, the package tray 102 is formed as a one-piece molded plastic component. The package tray 102 is formed as a solid component that is free of holes, tears, punctures, etc. In practice, the package tray 102 may be formed from a thermoformed or injection molded plastic material such as, without limitation: polypropylene, polycarbonate (PC), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), a PC/ABS blend, nylon, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and preferably formed from a polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) material. The package tray 102 can be formed from a transparent or clear plastic material such that the glucose sensor assembly 104 is visible.


The glucose sensor assembly 104 resides in an interior cavity 108 of the package tray 102; the interior cavity 108 may be shaped and sized in a manner that generally conforms to the glucose sensor assembly 104. In this regard, the package tray 102 may include a retaining feature 111 (also shown in FIG. 1) that accommodates a component of the glucose sensor assembly 104. The purpose of this retaining feature 111 is described in more detail below. Referring to FIG. 5, the front of the package tray 102 includes an opening 110 that leads to the interior cavity 108. The front of the package tray 102 also includes a sealing surface 112, which surrounds the opening 110. For ease of illustration, the sealing surface 112 is shaded in FIG. 5. Referring also to FIG. 2, the material 106 covers the opening 110 and is coupled to the package tray 102 in a manner that forms a seal between the sealing surface 112 and the material 106. In other words, the material 106 serves as a cover that encloses the glucose sensor assembly 104 within the interior cavity 108.


Referring now to FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, the illustrated embodiment of the glucose sensor assembly 104 generally includes, without limitation: a glucose sensor 200; a sensor base 202 coupled to the glucose sensor 200; a sensor introducer 204 that cooperates with the sensor base 202; a mounting base 206 for the sensor base 202; a liner 207; a sensor mounting pedestal 208; and an adhesive disk 209. The glucose sensor assembly 104 may also include a needle guard 210, which is an optional element that can be used with certain embodiments. As depicted in FIG. 1 and FIG. 3, the components of the glucose sensor assembly 104 are coupled together as a single unit for placement in the package tray 102. Many features, aspects, and characteristics of the glucose sensor assembly 104 and its individual elements are conventional and, as such, will not be described in detail here.


The glucose sensor 200 may be realized as an electrochemical sensor that includes the glucose oxidase enzyme, as is well understood by those familiar with glucose sensor technology. The glucose oxidase enzyme enables the glucose sensor 200 to monitor blood glucose levels in a diabetic patient by effecting a reaction of glucose and oxygen. Again, although certain embodiments pertain to glucose sensors, the manufacturing and packaging technology described here can be adapted for use with any one of the wide variety of sensors known in the art.


The glucose sensor 200 may be provided as an integral part of the sensor base 202, as depicted in FIG. 4. The sensor base 202 gives structural support to the glucose sensor 200, and facilitates entry of the glucose sensor 200 into the body of the patient. The sensor base 202 may also feature electrical and physical interfaces and elements that accommodate an electronics module (not shown), such as a wireless transmitter that communicates with an infusion pump, a monitor device, or the like. In certain embodiments the sensor base 202 is composed at least in part from a plastic material. For the embodiment described here, the bulk of the sensor base 202 is formed as a molded plastic component. In practice, the sensor base 202 may be formed from ABS, nylon, an ABS/PC blend, PVC, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polypropylene, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), or the like, and preferably polycarbonate.


The sensor introducer 204 is manipulated to introduce the glucose sensor 200 into the body of the patient. The sensor introducer 204 includes a spring loaded needle 212 and mating components 214 that engage corresponding features on the sensor base 202. FIG. 4 depicts the needle 212 in its extended position, where the needle 212 protrudes from the body of the sensor introducer 204. The sensor introducer 204 connects to the sensor base 202 before introducing the glucose sensor 200 into the body of the patient. The sensor introducer 204 and the sensor base 202 can be pre-connected as part of a sensor set, which could also include a sensor electronics module that connects to the sensor base 202 after insertion of the glucose sensor 200 in the body of the patient. Alternatively, the sensor introducer 204, the sensor base 202, and the glucose sensor 200 could be packaged and provided together, as depicted in FIG. 3. In certain embodiments the sensor introducer 204 is composed at least in part from a plastic material. For the embodiment described here, the bulk of the sensor introducer 204 is formed as a molded plastic component. In practice, the sensor introducer 204 may be formed from any of the materials mentioned above for the sensor base 202, and is preferably formed from polycarbonate.


The mounting base 206 affixes the sensor base 202 to the skin of the patient. The mounting base 206 may be made out of a flexible and breathable material with adhesive properties, such as cloth, a bandage-like material, and the like. For example, suitable materials could include polyurethane, polyethylene, polyester, polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or other polymers. The top side of the mounting base 206 is adapted to be attached to the sensor base 202 (and to the sensor electronics module, which is not shown). The bottom side of the mounting base 206 is adapted to be attached to the skin of the patient using an adhesive. An additional adhesive layer and the liner 207 may also be provided on the bottom of the mounting base 206 to temporarily secure the mounting base 206 to the sensor mounting pedestal 208 during packaging, shipping, and handling. In this regard, the adhesive disk 209 may be a double-sided adhesive element that maintains the liner 207 in position atop the sensor mounting pedestal 208. In turn, the mounting base 206 is maintained in position due to adhesion to the upper surface of the liner 207.


Referring also to FIG. 6, the sensor mounting pedestal 208 includes a needle sleeve 218 formed therein, which receives and protects the needle 212 and the glucose sensor 200 during packaging, shipping, and handling. The optional needle guard 210 resides within the needle sleeve 218, and it is composed of a soft and pliable material (such as silicone) for added protection of the needle 212. The sensor mounting pedestal 208 provides a sturdy protective platform for the glucose sensor assembly 104, as illustrated in FIG. 3. Thus, the glucose sensor assembly 104 can be placed into the package tray 102 as an integral unit. Referring again to FIG. 1 and FIG. 5, the sensor introducer 204 fits within the retaining feature 111 such that the needle 212 is protected during shipping and handling. The conformal nature of the package tray 102 ensures that the sensor introducer 204 and, therefore, the needle 212, remains in place relative to the sensor mounting pedestal 208 until the user removes the glucose sensor assembly 104 from the package.


As shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 6, this particular embodiment of the sensor mounting pedestal 208 includes a liner holder 211 that engages an edge, a hole, tabs, or any cooperating feature of the liner 207. In the illustrated implementation, the liner holder 211 is realized as two projecting “hooks” that extend from the front of the sensor mounting pedestal 208. As shown in FIG. 3, the liner holder 211 engages and holds the liner 207 when the glucose sensor assembly 104 is assembled. The liner holder 211 “catches” the liner 207 when the user separates the sensor mounting pedestal 208 from the rest of the assembly. More specifically, the liner holder 211 retains the liner 207 when the sensor mounting pedestal 208 and the adhesive element of the mounting base 206 are separated. This separation action may be accomplished via manual or automated insertion methodologies. The separation action results in the removal of the liner 207 from the bottom of the mounting base 206, which exposes some of the adhesive surface of the mounting base 206. The separation action also exposes the needle 212 such that it can be inserted into the skin. The liner holder 211 simplifies the insertion procedure and eliminates the need for the user to manually remove the liner 207 from the mounting base 206.


In certain embodiments the sensor mounting pedestal 208 is composed at least in part from a plastic material. For the embodiment described here, the bulk of the sensor mounting pedestal 208 is formed as a molded plastic component. In practice, the sensor mounting pedestal 208 may be formed from any of the materials mentioned above for the sensor base 202, and is preferably formed from polypropylene.


The material 106 forms a seal around the package tray 102, but it accommodates venting from inside the package tray 102 to outside the glucose sensor package 100. In this regard, the material 106 may be considered to be gas-permeable (at least in the inside-out direction) such that it allows volatile substances to vent from inside the sealed package tray 102 to outside the sealed package tray 102. In particular, the composition of the material 106 is such that it vents volatile substances that would otherwise degrade the glucose oxidase enzyme of the glucose sensor 200. Moreover, the material 106 has certain properties and characteristics that allow it to vent substances outgassed or otherwise produced from the materials used to fabricate the glucose sensor assembly 104. For example, certain chemicals, solvents, and/or gases may be produced from the plastic materials used to form the package tray 102, the sensor base 202, the sensor introducer 204, the mounting base 206, the adhesives, and the sensor mounting pedestal 208. Substances outgassed from these components and/or used during the fabrication of these components may include, without limitation: alcohol; ethanol; solvents; volatile (non)condensable materials; low-molecular-weight additives; reactive diluents; absorbed moisture; and the like. The material 106 allows these substances to exit the sealed package tray 102 such that they do not significantly degrade or otherwise adversely interact with the glucose oxidase enzyme of the glucose sensor 200.


The material 106 also serves as a microbial barrier that seals and protects the glucose sensor assembly 104 inside the package tray 102. As described in more detail below, the sealed package tray 102 is sterilized and the material 106 maintains the sterile condition of the glucose sensor assembly 104 while allowing the volatile manufacturing by-products to pass therethrough. Thus, the microbial barrier material 106 allows unwanted chemicals and substances to exit the glucose sensor package 100 while preventing contaminants from entering the sealed package tray 102 and otherwise maintaining the sterility of the glucose sensor assembly 104. The composition of the material 106 may include, for example, a high-density polyethylene, polyester, or polypropylene. In certain embodiments, the material 106 may be composed of TYVEK material, which is available from DuPont.


The glucose sensor assembly 104 can be removed from the package tray 102 by peeling away the material 106. Thereafter, the sensor mounting pedestal 208 is removed and the adhesive bottom surface of the mounting base 206 is exposed so that it can be adhered to the skin of the patient. The needle 212 of the sensor introducer 204 is used to penetrate the skin of the patient, such that the glucose sensor 200 enters the body of the patient. In this regard, the needle 212 is extended when the sensor base 202 is connected to the sensor introducer 204, and the glucose sensor 200 resides within the needle 212. The user inserts the needle 212 into the body of the patient, which introduces the glucose sensor 200 under the skin. After introducing the glucose sensor 200 in this manner, the user disconnects the sensor introducer 204 from the sensor base 202, leaving the sensor base 202 and the glucose sensor 200 in place.



FIG. 7 is a flow chart that illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a glucose sensor manufacturing process 300, which may be carried out to fabricate a glucose sensor product such as the glucose sensor package 100. It should be appreciated that the process 300 may include any number of additional or alternative tasks, the tasks shown in FIG. 7 need not be performed in the illustrated order, and the process 300 may be incorporated into a more comprehensive procedure or process having additional functionality not described in detail herein. Moreover, one or more of the tasks shown in FIG. 7 could be omitted from an embodiment of the process 300 as long as the intended overall functionality remains intact.


The manufacturing process 300 may begin by fabricating or otherwise obtaining the various glucose sensor components, the package tray, and the barrier/sealing material (task 302). The glucose sensor components can then be fabricated into the glucose sensor assembly (see FIG. 3) and prepared for packaging (task 304). After the glucose sensor assembly has been fabricated, it may be stored in an open air environment for a designated period of time to accommodate outgassing of substances from the glucose sensor assembly (task 305). For example, the glucose sensor assembly may be placed in a well ventilated area for the desired amount of time before proceeding with the manufacturing process 300.


After the outgassing period has lapsed, the glucose sensor assembly is placed and positioned inside the package tray (task 306), and the opening of the package tray is covered with the barrier/sealing material (task 308). As depicted in FIG. 2, the barrier/sealing material is positioned and aligned with the sealing surface of the package tray prior to sealing. In this regard, some of the barrier/sealing material overlies the sealing surface of the package tray. Next, the glucose sensor assembly is sealed inside the package tray with the barrier/sealing material (task 310). In practice, a seal is formed between the sealing surface of the package tray and the barrier/sealing material, resulting in a sealed package tray containing the glucose sensor assembly. This seal can be formed by applying heat and pressing the barrier/sealing material against the sealing surface of the package tray.


The sealed package tray can then be subjected to a sterilization procedure to sterilize the glucose sensor assembly inside the sealed package tray (task 312). The glucose sensor assembly may be sterilized by radiating the sealed package tray with sterilizing energy. In practice, electron beam sterilization or any suitable radiation sterilization technique may be employed during task 312 to sterilize the glucose sensor assembly. Notably, the barrier/sealing material maintains the sterility of the glucose sensor assembly while also allowing volatile substances (gases, chemicals, solvents, or the like) to vent and escape from inside the sealed package tray to the outside environment (task 314). As mentioned above, the barrier/sealing material may be a gas-permeable membrane that allows certain manufacturing by-products (which may be outgassed from the plastic and other materials that form the glucose sensor assembly) to pass through without compromising the sterile conditions inside the sealed package tray.


The sterilized glucose sensor package can then be labeled, stored, shipped, displayed, and otherwise handled for distribution and sale. The barrier/sealing material allows potentially volatile substances to vent rather than collect inside the sealed package tray. As described above, the venting of such volatiles is desirable to preserve the integrity and stability of the glucose sensor, and to extend the shelf life of the glucose sensor product.


While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or embodiments described herein are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the claimed subject matter in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing the described embodiment or embodiments. It should be understood that various changes can be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the scope defined by the claims, which includes known equivalents and foreseeable equivalents at the time of filing this patent application.

Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing a medical device package, the method comprising: fabricating a medical device assembly;placing the medical device assembly into a package tray;sealing the medical device assembly inside the package tray with a gas-permeable sealing material, resulting in a sealed package tray; andsterilizing the medical device assembly inside the sealed package tray, wherein the sealing material maintains sterility of the medical device assembly while allowing volatile substances to vent from inside the sealed package tray to outside the sealed package tray wherein the medical device assembly comprises an electrochemical sensor with glucose oxidase enzyme; and the sealing material vents volatile substances that would otherwise degrade the glucose oxidase enzyme.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein: the medical device assembly comprises a sensor mounting pedestal for the electrochemical sensor, the sensor mounting pedestal formed at least in part from a plastic material; andthe sealing material vents volatile substances outgassed from the plastic material.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein: the medical device assembly comprises a sensor introducer for the electrochemical sensor, the sensor introducer formed at least in part from a plastic material; andthe sealing material vents volatile substances outgassed from the plastic material.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the package tray is formed at least in part from a plastic material; and the sealing material vents volatile substances outgassed from the plastic material.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the sealing material is composed of high-density polyethylene that forms a microbial barrier for the medical device assembly.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein sterilizing the medical device assembly comprises radiating the sealed package tray with sterilizing energy.
US Referenced Citations (239)
Number Name Date Kind
3631847 Hobbs, II Jan 1972 A
3991881 Augurt Nov 1976 A
4091921 Lewis May 1978 A
4121714 Daly et al. Oct 1978 A
4206844 Thukamoto et al. Jun 1980 A
4212738 Henne Jul 1980 A
4270532 Franetzki et al. Jun 1981 A
4282872 Franetzki et al. Aug 1981 A
4373527 Fischell Feb 1983 A
4395259 Prestele et al. Jul 1983 A
4433072 Pusineri et al. Feb 1984 A
4443218 DeCant, Jr. et al. Apr 1984 A
4494950 Fischell Jan 1985 A
4542532 McQuilkin Sep 1985 A
4550731 Batina et al. Nov 1985 A
4559037 Franetzki et al. Dec 1985 A
4562751 Nason et al. Jan 1986 A
4671288 Gough Jun 1987 A
4678408 Nason et al. Jul 1987 A
4685903 Cable et al. Aug 1987 A
4731051 Fischell Mar 1988 A
4731726 Allen, III Mar 1988 A
4781798 Gough Nov 1988 A
4803625 Fu et al. Feb 1989 A
4809697 Causey, III et al. Mar 1989 A
4826810 Aoki May 1989 A
4871351 Feingold Oct 1989 A
4898578 Rubalcaba, Jr. Feb 1990 A
5003298 Havel Mar 1991 A
5011468 Lundquist et al. Apr 1991 A
5019974 Beckers May 1991 A
5050612 Matsumura Sep 1991 A
5078683 Sancoff et al. Jan 1992 A
5080653 Voss et al. Jan 1992 A
5097122 Colman et al. Mar 1992 A
5100380 Epstein et al. Mar 1992 A
5101814 Palti Apr 1992 A
5108819 Heller et al. Apr 1992 A
5153827 Coutre et al. Oct 1992 A
5165407 Wilson et al. Nov 1992 A
5247434 Peterson et al. Sep 1993 A
5262035 Gregg et al. Nov 1993 A
5262305 Heller et al. Nov 1993 A
5264104 Gregg et al. Nov 1993 A
5264105 Gregg et al. Nov 1993 A
5284140 Allen et al. Feb 1994 A
5299571 Mastrototaro Apr 1994 A
5307263 Brown Apr 1994 A
5317506 Coutre et al. May 1994 A
5320725 Gregg et al. Jun 1994 A
5322063 Allen et al. Jun 1994 A
5338157 Blomquist Aug 1994 A
5339821 Fujimoto Aug 1994 A
5341291 Roizen et al. Aug 1994 A
5344017 Wittrock Sep 1994 A
5350411 Ryan et al. Sep 1994 A
5356786 Heller et al. Oct 1994 A
5357427 Langen et al. Oct 1994 A
5368562 Blomquist et al. Nov 1994 A
5370622 Livingston et al. Dec 1994 A
5371687 Holmes, II et al. Dec 1994 A
5376070 Purvis et al. Dec 1994 A
5390671 Lord et al. Feb 1995 A
5391250 Cheney, II et al. Feb 1995 A
5403700 Heller et al. Apr 1995 A
5411647 Johnson et al. May 1995 A
5482473 Lord et al. Jan 1996 A
5485408 Blomquist Jan 1996 A
5497772 Schulman et al. Mar 1996 A
5505709 Funderburk et al. Apr 1996 A
5543326 Heller et al. Aug 1996 A
5569186 Lord et al. Oct 1996 A
5569187 Kaiser Oct 1996 A
5573506 Vasko Nov 1996 A
5582593 Hultman Dec 1996 A
5586553 Halili et al. Dec 1996 A
5593390 Castellano et al. Jan 1997 A
5593852 Heller et al. Jan 1997 A
5594638 Iliff Jan 1997 A
5609060 Dent Mar 1997 A
5626144 Tacklind et al. May 1997 A
5630710 Tune et al. May 1997 A
5643212 Coutre et al. Jul 1997 A
5660163 Schulman et al. Aug 1997 A
5660176 Iliff Aug 1997 A
5665065 Colman et al. Sep 1997 A
5665222 Heller et al. Sep 1997 A
5685844 Marttila Nov 1997 A
5687734 Dempsey et al. Nov 1997 A
5704366 Tacklind et al. Jan 1998 A
5750926 Schulman et al. May 1998 A
5754111 Garcia May 1998 A
5764159 Neftel Jun 1998 A
5772635 Dastur et al. Jun 1998 A
5779665 Mastrototaro et al. Jul 1998 A
5788669 Peterson Aug 1998 A
5791344 Schulman et al. Aug 1998 A
5800420 Gross et al. Sep 1998 A
5807336 Russo et al. Sep 1998 A
5814015 Gargano et al. Sep 1998 A
5822715 Worthington et al. Oct 1998 A
5832448 Brown Nov 1998 A
5840020 Heinonen et al. Nov 1998 A
5861018 Feierbach Jan 1999 A
5868669 Iliff Feb 1999 A
5871465 Vasko Feb 1999 A
5879163 Brown et al. Mar 1999 A
5885245 Lynch et al. Mar 1999 A
5897493 Brown Apr 1999 A
5899855 Brown May 1999 A
5904708 Goedeke May 1999 A
5913310 Brown Jun 1999 A
5917346 Gord Jun 1999 A
5918603 Brown Jul 1999 A
5925021 Castellano et al. Jul 1999 A
5933136 Brown Aug 1999 A
5935099 Peterson et al. Aug 1999 A
5940801 Brown Aug 1999 A
5956501 Brown Sep 1999 A
5960403 Brown Sep 1999 A
5965380 Heller et al. Oct 1999 A
5972199 Heller et al. Oct 1999 A
5978236 Faberman et al. Nov 1999 A
5997476 Brown Dec 1999 A
5999848 Gord et al. Dec 1999 A
5999849 Gord et al. Dec 1999 A
6009339 Bentsen et al. Dec 1999 A
6032119 Brown et al. Feb 2000 A
6043437 Schulman et al. Mar 2000 A
6081736 Colvin et al. Jun 2000 A
6083710 Heller et al. Jul 2000 A
6088608 Schulman et al. Jul 2000 A
6101478 Brown Aug 2000 A
6103033 Say et al. Aug 2000 A
6119028 Schulman et al. Sep 2000 A
6120676 Heller et al. Sep 2000 A
6121009 Heller et al. Sep 2000 A
6134461 Say et al. Oct 2000 A
6143164 Heller et al. Nov 2000 A
6162611 Heller et al. Dec 2000 A
6175752 Say et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183412 Benkowski et al. Feb 2001 B1
6233471 Berner et al. May 2001 B1
6246992 Brown Jun 2001 B1
6259937 Schulman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6329161 Heller et al. Dec 2001 B1
6408330 DeLaHuerga Jun 2002 B1
6424847 Mastrototaro et al. Jul 2002 B1
6472122 Schulman et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484045 Holker et al. Nov 2002 B1
6484046 Say et al. Nov 2002 B1
6503381 Gotoh et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514718 Heller et al. Feb 2003 B2
6544173 West et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553263 Meadows et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554798 Mann et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558320 Causey, III et al. May 2003 B1
6558351 Steil et al. May 2003 B1
6560741 Gerety et al. May 2003 B1
6565509 Say et al. May 2003 B1
6579690 Bonnecaze et al. Jun 2003 B1
6591125 Buse et al. Jul 2003 B1
6592745 Feldman et al. Jul 2003 B1
6605200 Mao et al. Aug 2003 B1
6605201 Mao et al. Aug 2003 B1
6607658 Heller et al. Aug 2003 B1
6616819 Liamos et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618934 Feldman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6623501 Heller et al. Sep 2003 B2
6641533 Causey, III et al. Nov 2003 B2
6654625 Say et al. Nov 2003 B1
6659980 Moberg et al. Dec 2003 B2
6671554 Gibson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676816 Mao et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689265 Heller et al. Feb 2004 B2
6728576 Thompson et al. Apr 2004 B2
6733471 Ericson et al. May 2004 B1
6746582 Heller et al. Jun 2004 B2
6747556 Medema et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749740 Liamos et al. Jun 2004 B2
6752787 Causey, III et al. Jun 2004 B1
6809653 Mann et al. Oct 2004 B1
6881551 Heller et al. Apr 2005 B2
6892085 McIvor et al. May 2005 B2
6893545 Gotoh et al. May 2005 B2
6895263 Shin et al. May 2005 B2
6916159 Rush et al. Jul 2005 B2
6932584 Gray et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932894 Mao et al. Aug 2005 B2
6942518 Liamos et al. Sep 2005 B2
7153263 Carter et al. Dec 2006 B2
7153289 Vasko Dec 2006 B2
7396330 Banet et al. Jul 2008 B2
7468033 Van Antwerp et al. Dec 2008 B2
20010044731 Coffman et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020013518 West et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020055857 Mault et al. May 2002 A1
20020082665 Haller et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020137997 Mastrototaro et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020161288 Shin et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030060765 Campbell et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030078560 Miller et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088166 Say et al. May 2003 A1
20030144581 Conn et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152823 Heller Aug 2003 A1
20030176183 Drucker et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030188427 Say et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199744 Buse et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208113 Mault et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220552 Reghabi et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040061232 Shah et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040061234 Shah et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064133 Miller et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064156 Shah et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073095 Causey, III et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040074785 Holker et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093167 Braig et al. May 2004 A1
20040097796 Berman et al. May 2004 A1
20040102683 Khanuja et al. May 2004 A1
20040111017 Say et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122353 Shahmirian et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040167465 Mihai et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040263354 Mann et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038331 Silaski et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038680 McMahon et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050154271 Rasdal et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050192557 Brauker et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060229694 Schulman et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238333 Welch et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060293571 Bao et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070088521 Shmueli et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070135866 Baker et al. Jun 2007 A1
20080154503 Wittenber et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090081951 Erdmann et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082635 Baldus et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090299301 Gottlieb et al. Dec 2009 A1
20120000804 Barnes et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120006717 Zambaux Jan 2012 A1
20120305426 Valaie et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (27)
Number Date Country
4329229 Mar 1995 DE
0319268 Nov 1988 EP
0806738 Nov 1997 EP
0880936 Dec 1998 EP
1338295 Aug 2003 EP
1631036 Mar 2006 EP
2218831 Nov 1989 GB
WO 9620745 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9636389 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9637246 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9721456 Jun 1997 WO
WO 9820439 May 1998 WO
WO 9824358 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9842407 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9849659 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9859487 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9908183 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9910801 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9918532 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9922236 May 1999 WO
WO 0010628 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0019887 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0048112 Aug 2000 WO
WO 02058537 Aug 2002 WO
WO 03001329 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03094090 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2005065538 Jul 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (93)
Entry
Dupont, DuPont Medical Packaging Technical Reference Guide, 2009.
PCT Search Report (PCT/US02/03299), Oct. 31, 2002, Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.
(Animas Corporation, 1999). Animas . . . bringing new life to insulin therapy.
Bode B W, et al. (1996). Reduction in Severe Hypoglycemia with Long-Term Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in Type I Diabetes. Diabetes Care, vol. 19, No. 4, 324-327.
Boland E (1998). Teens Pumping it Up! Insulin Pump Therapy Guide for Adolescents. 2nd Edition.
Brackenridge B P (1992). Carbohydrate Gram Counting a Key to Accurate Mealtime Boluses in Intensive Diabetes Therapy. Practical Diabetology, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 22-28.
Brackenridge, B P et al. (1995). Counting Carbohydrates How to Zero in on Good Control. MiniMed Technologies Inc.
Farkas-Hirsch Ret al. (1994). Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: A Review of the Past and Its Implementation for the Future. Diabetes Spectrum From Research to Practice, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 80-84, 136-138.
Hirsch I B et al. (1990). Intensive Insulin Therapy for Treatment of Type I Diabetes. Diabetes Care, vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 1265-1283.
Kulkarni K et al. (1999). Carbohydrate Counting a Primer for Insulin Pump Users to Zero in on Good Control. MiniMed Inc.
Marcus A O et al. (1996). Insulin Pump Therapy Acceptable Alternative to Injection Therapy. Postgraduate Medicine, vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 125-142.
Reed J et al. (1996). Voice of the Diabetic, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 1-38.
Skyler J S (1989). Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion [CSII] With External Devices: Current Status. Update in Drug Delivery Systems, Chapter 13, pp. 163-183. Futura Publishing Company.
Skyler J S et al. (1995). The Insulin Pump Therapy Book Insights from the Experts. MiniMe•Technologies.
Strowig S M (1993). Initiation and Management of Insulin Pump Therapy. The Diabetes Educator, vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 50-60.
Walsh J, et al. (1989). Pumping Insulin: The Art of Using an Insulin Pump. Published by MiniMed•Technologies.
(Intensive Diabetes Management, 1995). Insulin Infusion Pump Therapy. pp. 66-78.
Disetronic My Choice™ D-TRON™ Insulin Pump Reference Manual. (no date).
Disetronic H-TRON® plus Quick Start Manual. (no date).
Disetronic My Choice H-TRONplus Insulin Pump Reference Manual. (no date).
Disetronic H-TRON® plus Reference Manual. (no date).
(MiniMed, 1996). The MiniMed 506. 7 pages. Retrieved on Sep. 16, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://web.archive.org/web/19961111054527/www.minimed.com/files/506—pic.htm.
(MiniMed, 1997). MiniMed 507 Specifications. 2 pages. Retrieved on Sep. 16, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://web.archive.org/web/19970124234841/www.minimed.com/files/mmn075.htm.
(MiniMed, 1996). FAQ: The Practical Things . . . pp. 1-4. Retrieved on Sep. 16, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://web.archive.org/web/19961111054546/www.minimed.com/files/faq—pract.htm.
(MiniMed, 1997). Wanted: a Few Good Belt Clips! 1 page. Retrieved on Sep. 16, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://web.archive.org/web/19970124234559/www.minimed.com/files/mmn002.htm.
(MiniMed Technologies, 1994). MiniMed 506 Insulin Pump User's Guide.
(MiniMed Technologies, 1994). MiniMed™ Dosage Calculator Initial Meal Bolus Guidelines / MiniMed™ Dosage Calculator Initial Basal Rate Guidelines Percentage Method. 4 pages.
(MiniMed, 1996). MiniMed™ 507 Insulin Pump User's Guide.
(MiniMed, 1997). MiniMed™ 507 Insulin Pump User's Guide.
(MiniMed, 1998). MiniMed 507C Insulin Pump User's Guide.
(MiniMed International, 1998). MiniMed 507C Insulin Pump for those who appreciate the difference.
(MiniMed Inc., 1999). MiniMed 508 Flipchart Guide to Insulin Pump Therapy.
(MiniMed Inc., 1999). Insulin Pump Comparison / Pump Therapy Will Change Your Life.
(MiniMed, 2000). MiniMed® 508 User's Guide.
(MiniMed Inc., 2000). MiniMed® Now [I] Can Meal Bolus Calculator / MiniMed® Now [I] Can Correction Bolus Calculator.
(MiniMed Inc., 2000). Now [I] Can MiniMed Pump Therapy.
(MiniMed Inc., 2000). Now [I] Can MiniMed Diabetes Management.
(Medtronic MiniMed, 2002). The 508 Insulin Pump a Tradition of Excellence.
(Medtronic MiniMed, 2002). Medtronic MiniMed Meal Bolus Calculator and Correction Bolus Calculator. International Version.
Abel, P., et al., “Experience with an implantable glucose sensor as a prerequiste of an artificial beta cell,” Biomed. Biochim. Acta 43 (1984) 5, pp. 577-584.
Bindra, Dilbir S., et al., “Design and in Vitro Studies of a Needle-Type Glucose Sensor for a Subcutaneous Monitoring,” American Chemistry Society, 1991, 63, pp. 1692-1696.
Boguslavsky, Leonid, et al., “Applications of redox polymers in biosensors,” Sold State Ionics 60, 1993, pp. 189-197.
Geise, Robert J., et al., “Electropolymerized 1,3-diaminobenzene for the construction of a 1,1′-dimethylferrocene mediated glucose biosensor,” Analytica Chimica Acta, 281, 1993, pp. 467-473.
Gernet, S., et al., “A Planar Glucose Enzyme Electrode,” Sensors and Actuators, 17, 1989, pp. 537-540.
Gernet, S., et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of a Planar Electromechanical Cell and its Application as a Glucose Sensor,” Sensors and Actuators, 18, 1989, pp. 59-70.
Gorton, L., et al., “Amperometric Biosensors Based on an Apparent Direct Electron Transfer Between Electrodes and Immobilized Peroxiases,” Analyst, Aug. 1991, vol. 117, pp. 1235-1241.
Gorton, L., et al., “Amperometric Glucose Sensors Based on Immobilized Glucose-Oxidizing Enymes and Chemically Modified Electrodes,” Analytica Chimica Acta, 249, 1991, pp. 43-54.
Gough, D. A., et al., “Two-Dimensional Enzyme Electrode Sensor for Glucose,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 57, No. 5, 1985, pp. 2351-2357.
Gregg, Brian A., et al., “Cross-Linked Redox Gels Containing Glucose Oxidase for Amperometric Biosensor Applications,” Analytical Chemistry, 62, pp. 258-263.
Gregg, Brian A., et al., “Redox Polymer Films Containing Enzymes. 1. A Redox-Conducting Epoxy Cement: Synthesis, Characterization, and Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Hydroquinone,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 95, No. 15, 1991, pp. 5970-5975.
Hashiguchi, Yasuhiro, MD, et al., “Development of a Miniaturized Glucose Monitoring System by Combining a Needle-Type Glucose Sensor With Microdialysis Sampling Method,” Diabetes Care, vol. 17, No. 5, May 1994, pp. 387-389.
Heller, Adam, “Electrical Wiring of Redox Enzymes,” Acc. Chem. Res., vol. 23, No. 5, May 1990, pp. 128-134.
Jobst, Gerhard, et al., “Thin-Film Microbiosensors for Glucose-Lactate Monitoring,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 68, No. 18, Sep. 15, 1996, pp. 3173-3179.
Johnson, K.W., et al., “In vivo evaluation of an electroenzymatic glucose sensor implanted in subcutaneous tissue,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 7, 1992, pp. 709-714.
Jönsson, G., et al., “An Electromechanical Sensor for Hydrogen Peroxide Based on Peroxidase Adsorbed on a Spectrographic Graphite Electrode,” Electroanalysis, 1989, pp. 465-468.
Kanapieniene, J. J., et al., “Miniature Glucose Biosensor with Extended Linearity,” Sensors and Actuators, B. 10, 1992, pp. 37-40.
Kawamori, Ryuzo, et al., “Perfect Normalization of Excessive Glucagon Responses to Intraveneous Arginine in Human Diabetes Mellitus With the Artificial Beta-Cell,” Diabetes vol. 29, Sep. 1980, pp. 762-765.
Kimura, J., et al., “An Immobilized Enzyme Membrane Fabrication Method,” Biosensors 4, 1988, pp. 41-52.
Koudelka, M., et al., “In-vivo Behaviour of Hypodermically Implanted Microfabricated Glucose Sensors,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics 6, 1991, pp. 31-36.
Koudelka, M., et al., “Planar Amperometric Enzyme-Based Glucose Microelectrode,” Sensors & Actuators, 18, 1989, pp. 157-165.
Mastrototaro, John J., et al., “An electroenzymatic glucose sensor fabricated on a flexible substrate,” Sensors & Actuators, B. 5, 1991, pp. 139-144.
Mastrototaro, John J., et al., “An Electroenzymatic Sensor Capable of 72 Hour Continuous Monitoring of Subcutaneous Glucose,” 14th Annual International Diabetes Federation Congress, Washington D.C., Jun. 23-28, 1991.
McKean, Brian D., et al., “A Telemetry-Instrumentation System for Chronically Implanted Glucose and Oxygen Sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vo. 35, No. 7, Jul. 1988, pp. 526-532.
Monroe, D., “Novel Implantable Glucose Sensors,” ACL, Dec. 1989, pp. 8-16.
Morff, Robert J., et al., “Microfabrication of Reproducible, Economical, Electroenzymatic Glucose Sensors,” Annuaal International Conference of teh IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vo. 12, No. 2, 1990, pp. 483-484.
Moussy, Francis, et al., “Performance of Subcutaneously Implanted Needle-Type Glucose Sensors Employing a Novel Trilayer Coating,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 65, No. 15, Aug. 1, 1993, pp. 2072-2077.
Nakamoto, S., et al., “A Lift-Off Method for Patterning Enzyme-Immobilized Membranes in Multi-Biosensors,” Sensors and Actuators 13, 1988, pp. 165-172.
Nishida, Kenro, et al., “Clinical applications of teh wearable artifical endocrine pancreas with the newly designed needle-type glucose sensor,” Elsevier Sciences B.V., 1994, pp. 353-358.
Nishida, Kenro, et al., “Development of a ferrocene-mediated needle-type glucose sensor covereed with newly designd biocompatible membrane, 2-methacryloyloxyethylphosphorylcholine-co-n-butyl nethacrylate,” Medical Progress Through Technology, vol. 21, 1995, pp. 91-103.
Poitout, V., et al., “A glucose monitoring system for on line estimation oin man of blood glucose concentration using a miniaturized glucose sensor implanted in the subcutaneous tissue adn a wearable control unit,” Diabetologia, vol. 36, 1991, pp. 658-663.
Reach, G., “A Method for Evaluating in vivo the Functional Characteristics of Glucose Sensors,” Biosensors 2, 1986, pp. 211-220.
Shaw, G. W., et al., “In vitro testing of a simply constructed, highly stable glucose sensor suitable for implantation in diabetic patients,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics 6, 1991, pp. 401-406.
Shichiri, M., “A Needle-Type Glucose Sensor—A Valuable Tool Not Only for a Self-Blood Glucose Monitoring but for a Wearable Artifical Pancreas,” Life Support Systems Proceedings, XI Annual Meeting ESAO, Alpbach-Innsbruck, Austria, Sep. 1984, pp. 7-9.
Shichiri, Motoaki, et al., “An artificial endocrine pancreas—problems awaiting solution for long-term clinical applications of a glucose sensor,” Frontiers Med. Biol. Engng., 1991, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 283-292.
Shichiri, Motoaki, et al., “Closed-Loop Glycemic Control with a Wearable Artificial Endocrine Pancreas—Variations in Daily Insulin Requirements to Glycemic Response,” Diabetes, vol. 33, Dec. 1984, pp. 1200-1202.
Shichiri, Motoaki, et al., “Glycaemic Control in a Pacreatectomized Dogs with a Wearable Artificial Endocrine Pancreas,” Diabetologia, vol. 24, 1983, pp. 179-184.
Shichiri, M., et al., “In Vivo Characteristics of Needle-Type Glucose Sensor—Measurements of Subcutaneous Glucose Concentrations in Human Volunteers,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, Supplement Series vol. No. 20, 1988, pp. 17-20.
Shichiri, M., et al., “Membrane design for extending the long-life of an implantable glucose sensor,” Diab. Nutr. Metab., vol. 2, No. 4, 1989, pp. 309-313.
Shichiri, Motoaki, et al., “Normalization of the Paradoxic Secretion of Glucagon in Diabetes Who Were Controlled by the Artificial Beta Cell,” Diabetes, vol. 28, Apr. 1979, pp. 272-275.
Shichiri, Motoaki, et al., “Telemetry Glucose Monitoring Device with Needle-Type Glucose Sensor: A useful Tool for Blood Glucose Monitoring in Diabetic Individuals,” Diabetes Care, vol. 9, No. 3, May-Jun. 1986, pp. 298-301.
Shichiri, Motoaki, et al., “Wearable Artificial Endocrine Pancreas with Needle-Type Glucose Sensor,” The Lancet, Nov. 20, 1982, pp. 1129-1131.
Shichiri, Motoaki, et al., “The Wearable Artificial Endocrine Pancreas with a Needle-Type Glucose Sensor: Perfect Glycemic Control in Ambulatory Diabetes,” Acta Paediatr Jpn 1984, vol. 26, pp. 359-370.
Shinkai, Seiji, “Molecular Recognitiion of Mono- and Di-saccharides by Phenylboronic Acids in Solvent Extraction and as a Monolayer,” J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1991, pp. 1039-1041.
Shults, Mark C., “A Telemetry-Instrumentation System for Monitoring Multiple Subcutaneously Implanted Glucose Sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, No. 10, Oct. 1994, pp. 937-942.
Sternberg, Robert, et al., “Study and Development of Multilayer Needle-type Enzyme-based Glucose Microsensors,” Biosensors, vol. 4, 1988, pp. 27-40.
Tamiya, E., et al., “Micro Glucose Sensors using Electron Mediators Immobilized on a Polypyrrole-Modified Electrode,” Sensors and Actuators, vol. 18, 1989, pp. 297-307.
Tsukagoshi, Kazuhiko, et al., “Specific Complexation with Mono- and Disaccharides that can be Detected by Circular Dichroism,” J. Org. Chem., vol. 56, 1991, pp. 4089-4091.
Urban, G., et al., “Miniaturized multi-enzyme biosensors integrated with pH sensors on flexible polymer carriers for in vivo applciations,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 7, 1992, pp. 733-739.
Ubran, G., et al., “Miniaturized thin-film biosensors using covalently immobilized glucose oxidase,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 6, 1991, pp. 555-562.
Velho, G., et al., “In vivo calibration of a subcutaneous glucose sensor for determination of subcutaneous glucose kinetics,” Diab. Nutr. Metab., vol. 3, 1988, pp. 227-233.
Wang, Joseph, et al., “Needle-Type Dual Microsensor for the Simultaneous Monitoring of Glucose and Insulin,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 73, 2001, pp. 844-847.
Yamasaki, Yoshimitsu, et al., “Direct Measurement of Whole Blood Glucose by a Needle-Type Sensor,” Clinics Chimica Acta, vol. 93, 1989, pp. 93-98.
Yokoyama, K., “Integrated Biosensor for Glucose and Galactose,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 218, 1989, pp. 137-142.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120227358 A1 Sep 2012 US