The present invention relates generally to glucosylated steviol glycoside compositions and methods for making and using them as a taste improver and flavor modifier in various food and beverage products. The invention also relates to a combination of selective combination of glucosylated steviol glycoside components and steviol glycoside molecules from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant extract to make the optimum sweetness profile and flavor modification in food and beverage applications. The invention also relates to the combination of the steviol glycoside derived molecules and maltodextrin derived from starch to provide the mouthfeel and flavor modification characteristics of Glucosylated steviol Glycosides in reduced or no sugar added food and beverage products.
The extract of Stevia rebaudiana plant contains a mixture of different sweet diterpene glycosides, which have a single base—steviol and differ by the presence of carbohydrate residues at positions C13 and C19. These glycosides accumulate in Stevia leaves and compose approximately 10%-20% of the total dry weight. Depending on the variety of Stevia plant, the major steviol glycoside molecules present in the stevia extract are stevioside, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside C, Dulcoside A, Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside B and Rebaudioside F. Other minor components are Rebaudioside E, Steviolbioside and Rubusoside. Recent research found additional steviol glycoside molecules (Ohta et al, 2010; Prakash et al, 2013): Rebaudioside G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, and O.
All steviol glycoside molecules have high intensity of sweetness, ranging between 50 to 400 times sweeter than sugar. However, apart from the high level of sweetness, they have also intrinsic properties of bitter and licorice taste and undesirable aftertaste. Some undesirable taste characteristics of glycosides can be as a result of contamination of other substances present in stevia extract.
One of the main ways to improve the taste quality is the enzymatic glycosylation of mixture of semi-purified steviol glycosides. It is known that the undesired taste attributes can be substantially reduced or eliminated by the reaction of intermolecular transglycosylation of various enzymes, upon which the attachment of new carbohydrates at positions C13 and C19 of steviol glycosides takes place (
In this invention, a process is developed to make a mixture of glucosylated steviol glycosides with small amount of other steviol glycosides and maltodextrin. The process involved precise control of pH, temperature, enzyme source and activity, quality of stevia extract, glucose-donor (amount and source) and time to achieve blends of different ratios of glucosylated steviol glycosides, steviol glycoside molecules, and maltodextrin.
The present invention is directed to a taste and flavor profile improving composition. The composition includes glucosylated steviol glycosides, steviol glycosides and maltodextrin. In some embodiments, the glucosylated steviol glycosides may include a plurality of glucose units. For example, the glucosylated steviol glycosides may include three, four, five, or more than five glucose units (
The invention, in part, pertains to an ingredient containing glucosylated steviol glycoside (GSG) of different degree of glycosylation to steviol glycoside molecules derived from stevia extract of Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni plant. Also, this invention, in part, pertains to specific blends of GSG components with varying degree of glycosylation.
The invention, in part, pertains to an ingredient comprising steviol glycosides of Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni plant. The steviol glycosides are selected from the group consisting of stevioside, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside B, Rebaudioside C, Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside E, Rebaudioside F, dulcoside A, steviolbioside, rubusoside, as well as other steviol glycosides found in Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni plant and mixtures thereof. Rebaudioside is commonly expressed as Reb or reb also.
The invention, in part, pertains to specific blends of different steviol glycosides (SG) and glucosylated steviol glycosides (GSG) for producing an ingredient containing Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside B, stevioside, Rebaudioside C, and other steviol glycosides found in Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni plant and mixtures thereof.
The invention, in part, pertains to specific blends of different GSG, SG components and residual maltodextrins derived from starch, which is used as glucose-donor. The source of starch, such as, but not limited to, tapioca, maize, wheat, potato, barley, sweet potato and other commercial and non-commercial carbohydrate source.
The present invention is also directed to a process to make the different blends of GSG and SG from stevia extracts of different amount and mixture of steviol glycosides. The process conditions, type and ratio of stevia extract and starch used are crucial for making the composition, which will yield different amount and composition of GSG, SG and maltodextrin.
The invention, in part, pertains to a process of manufacturing the specific blend of GSG components, selected steviol glycosides (SG) and maltodextrin. The processing steps include:
The present invention is also directed to a food or beverage product having an intense taste and flavor profile, wherein the food or beverage product includes a taste and flavor modifying composition comprising glucosylated steviol glycosides, selected steviol glycosides and maltodextrins. A wide range of food and beverage products, such as, but not limited to, carbonated soft drinks, fruit juices, dairy foods, dairy beverages, baked goods, cereal products, and table top sweeteners, may be made in accordance with the present invention. The taste and flavor profile of a food or beverage product including a taste and flavor modifying composition, wherein the taste and flavor modifying composition includes the blend of glucosylated steviol glycosides, steviol glycosides and maltodextrin, may be more intense than a comparative taste and flavor profile of a comparative food or beverage product which does not include the taste and flavor modifying composition. Moreover, the mouthfeel of a food or beverage product including the taste and flavor modifying composition, wherein the taste and flavor modifying composition includes glucosylated steviol glycosides, selected steviol glycosides and maltodextrins, may be improved in relation to a mouthfeel of a comparative food or beverage product which does not include the taste and flavor modifying composition.
The present invention is further directed to a method of enhancing the taste and flavor intensity of a food or beverage product, including the step of adding a taste and flavor modifying composition to the food or beverage product, wherein the taste and flavor modifying composition includes the blend of glucosylated steviol glycosides, selected steviol glycosides and maltodextrins.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features of the invention which form the subject of the claims of the invention will be described hereinafter. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other methods or structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
The compositions can be used as flavor modifier in various food and beverage products. Non-limiting examples of beverage products include carbonated and still beverages, flavored water, juice-based beverages, energy drinks and powder soft drinks. Non-limiting examples of food include dairy products (yogurt, yogurt drinks, flavored milk, frozen dairy desserts including ice cream), baked goods and baking mixes (bread, biscuits, cookies, muffins, rolls, and baking mixes), sauces and gravies, jams and jellies, gelatins, puddings and fillings, soy sauce and other soy based products, breakfast cereals, condiments and relishes, confections and frostings, processed fruits and vegetables, sugar substitutes and confectionery products including chewing gums.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the embodiments of the invention.
It has been unexpectedly discovered that glycosylation of steviol glycosides beyond a certain number of glucose units effectively reduces sweetness. It has also been discovered that with the reduction of sweetness, the glucosylated steviol glycosides (hereinafter “GSG”) can contribute to the modification of flavor and sweetness profiles in a wide range of food and beverage applications.
It has also been discovered that the modification of flavor and sweetness profile is affected by the composition of the blend of GSG, steviol glycosides (SG) and maltodextrin. The size and amount of GSG molecules and the type and amount of residual steviol glycoside (SG) contribute different degree of flavor modification. Therefore, while sweetness decreases with glycosylation, flavor modification increases. The flavor modification may include an increase (enhance) in certain flavor note and/or reduction (suppress) of certain other flavor notes. The blend of GSG and SG provides a certain amount of sweetness, but the present invention shows that such blends modify the flavor and sweetness profile in a wide range of food and beverage applications.
The present invention pertains to a process where the blend of specific type and content of GSG and SG made from Tapioca starch and stevia extract, which contains total steviol glycoside content from 50 to 100%, with predominant steviol glycoside molecules of stevioside, Reb A, Reb B, Reb C and Reb D. The specific type of GSG means GSG molecules derived from steviol glycosides with different degree of glycosylation, resulting number of additional glucose units added to base steviol glycoside molecules. The type of residual steviol glycosides means the unreacted residual steviol glycosides, which may be stevioside, Reb A, Reb B, Reb C, Reb D and other steviol glycoside molecules present in the stevia extract.
The present invention also pertains to the specific composition of blends, where the type and amount of different GSG molecules and SG molecules contribute different degree of taste modification in the food and beverage applications.
Advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The compositions can be used as flavor and sweetness profile modifier in various food and beverage products. Non-limiting examples of food and beverage products include carbonated soft drinks, ready to drink beverages, energy drinks, isotonic drinks, low-calorie drinks, zero-calorie drinks, sports drinks, teas, fruit and vegetable juices, juice drinks, dairy drinks, yoghurt drinks, alcohol beverages, powdered beverages, bakery products, cookies, biscuits, baking mixes, cereals, confectioneries, candies, toffees, chewing gum, dairy products, flavored milk, yoghurts, flavored yoghurts, cultured milk, soy sauce and other soy base products, salad dressings, mayonnaise, vinegar, frozen-desserts, meat products, fish-meat products, bottled and canned foods, tabletop sweeteners, fruits and vegetables.
Additionally the compositions can be used in drug or pharmaceutical preparations and cosmetics, including but not limited to toothpaste, mouthwash, cough syrup, chewable tablets, lozenges, vitamin preparations, and the like.
The compositions can be used “as-is” or in combination with other sweeteners, sugar alcohols, flavors and food ingredients in food, beverage, pharmaceutical and cosmetics applications.
The following examples illustrate various embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the materials, proportions, conditions and procedures set forth in the examples, which are only illustrative.
Preparation of the Blend of Steviol Glycosides and Glucosylated Steviol Glycosides
Several compositions containing blends of different GSG and SG components were prepared from stevia extract and starch. The samples as outlined below were produced by treating the raw materials, steviol glycosides extracted from the Stevia plant, and starch extracted from tapioca, with a natural enzyme. The enzyme transfers glucose units from starch to the steviol glycosides. The enzyme used to facilitate this transfer is produced by means of fermentation using non-GMO (non-genetically modified organism) bacteria. Specifically,
Manufacturing steps for blends of GSG and SG
d) CGTase (cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase) enzyme added to mixture and incubated at 60° C. for a desired length of reaction time to glycosylate steviol glycosides with glucose molecules derived from Tapioca starch.
Stevia Extract Used
Evaluation of Iso-Sweetness of Different Blends of GSG & SG
To determine the concentration of the blends (Table 1) at which barely any sweetness perception is detected, a series of samples of each blend (Concentration ranging between 40 mg/L and 140 mg/L) were prepared and tested against 1% sugar solution. The test parameters and results are outlined in Tables 2 & 3, respectively.
Evaluation and Comparison of Sweetness of the GSG+SG Composition with Selected Commercial Steviol Glycoside Samples
To evaluate the iso-sweetness of steviol glycosides (SG) and glucosylated steviol glycosides (GSG), a series of stevia derived samples were selected as shown in Table 4. To evaluate the sweetness potency of various concentrations of stevia products in aqueous solutions, aqueous solutions of sugar, stevioside, Rebaudioside A (Reb A), Rebaudioside D (Reb D), GSG-S (contains mainly smaller GSGs with 1 or 2 glucose units added to SG), GSG-M and GSG-L at various concentrations were prepared using bottled water. Samples were evaluated by the judges at room temperature (70-72° F.).
The judges were 11 panelists that have been previously qualified for their taste acuity and trained in the use of a sweetness intensity rating scale. The evaluations were done in duplicate using the same panelists so that a total of 22 values were generated for each average data point. Prior to the conduct of the study, judges were trained with sugar solutions and the use of the ballot.
Samples were given to the judges sequentially and coded with triple digit numbers. The order of sample presentation was randomized to avoid order of presentation bias. A rest period of five minutes was provided between samples. Water and unsalted crackers were provided in order to cleanse the palate.
Results were statistically analyzed to generate a standard error value for each solution as well as a confidence level at a 95% level. By comparing the sweetness of each test ingredient to the sweetness of several sucrose solutions, the sweetness potency (at 5% sucrose equivalent) and concentration of each stevia ingredient was estimated as shown in
Effect of Glycosylation on Flavor Modification of No-Sugar-Added Beverage
A mango-passion fruit flavored water formula was developed to evaluate the effect of different stevia ingredients on the sweetness and flavor profile of the beverage. A total of 9-10 panel members participated in this sensory test, where they assigned relative values to sweetness, onset of sweetness, mango fruit flavor, passion fruit flavor, acidity, overall taste, etc.
Table 5 shows the no-sugar added beverage formula that used mainly Reb A, Reb D, GSG-S, or GSG-L. The amount of each ingredient (Reb A: 150 ppm; Reb D: 165 ppm; GSG-S: 190 ppm; and GSG-L: 300 ppm) was selected to have around 50 ppm of steviol in each formula.
Stevia
Effect of the GSG Composition of the Blend on Taste Modification of Calorie Reduced Water Solution
To determine the contribution of different flavor blends on a sweetened, acidified water (with citric acid) formulation, samples were made with 9% sugar solution (pH 3.2) and GSG compositions as shown in Table 6 and compared against 10% sugar solution (pH 3.2).
Since sweetness intensity can impact the perception of the overall taste, flavor and sweetness profile, the main objective was to determine the contribution of different flavoring blends on different taste attributes by adding amount of each blend (Table 6) that contributes 1% sugar equivalent sweetness. The taste attributes of sweetness intensity, bitterness intensity and overall liking were used to rank flavors from most to least desirables.
The sensory evaluation was conducted by 20 members consumer panel recruited in Chicago area. Each person was trained on 15 point sweetness and bitterness intensity scale. For each sample, sweetness and bitterness intensity was evaluated on a 15 point scale. Sweet and bitter aftertaste was assessed on a 5 point scale. Overall liking was evaluated on a 9 point hedonic scale. Each participant tasted 5 samples during one session. Unsalted cracker and water were used to cleanse palate in addition to 2 minute wait between samples.
In forced ranking, the consumer panels found that GSG-S contributed the highest perception of sweetness, which decreased with larger molecules of GSG (GSG M & GSG-L) as shown in
Effect of the GSG and SG Composition of the Blend on Flavor Modification of Calorie Reduced Water Solution
To determine the contribution of flavor blends derived from different stevia extract and the distribution of residual SG, two GSG samples, GSG-M and GSG-RW were selected. Both these samples have similar GSG content, but they were made from different stevia extracts. GSG-M is made from a stevia extract with high Reb A content and it contains the predominantly Reb A as the residual SG in the blend. GSG-S is made from a stevia extract with high stevioside content and thus it contains the predominantly stevioside as the residual SG in the blend. To investigate the impact of the difference in residual SG content, two sets of acidified sweetened water (with citric acid) formulation, as outlined below, were prepared and tested by 25 consumer panel members.
Each participant was presented Set 1 first, followed by Set 2. The order of samples in each set was randomized and evaluated for sweetness, bitterness intensity and aftertaste and overall liking. Also, each panel member was asked for forced preference for liking in each set.
The Set-1 test samples sweetened with GSG-M and GSG-SW were judged directionally sweeter than 10% sugar solution (p=0.27 and p=0.15 respectively). The bitterness and aftertaste was similar to the control. No significant differences were seen in overall liking. In forced preference testing, the panel members preferred GSG-SW (48% ranked 1st) over control (28% ranked 1st) and GSG-M (24% ranked 1st).
The set-2 samples sweetened with Reb A and the GSG-M or GSG-SW scored directionally higher on sweetness intensity. The bitterness for GSG-SW was directionally lower than control (p=0.6). No significant differences were seen in aftertaste and overall liking.
It is to be understood that the foregoing descriptions and specific embodiments shown herein are merely illustrative of the best mode of the invention and the principles thereof, and that modifications and additions may be easily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is understood to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/553,975, filed on Aug. 28, 2019, which is a continuation of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/437,208, filed on Feb. 20, 2017, which is a divisional of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/742,457, filed on Jun. 17, 2015, which is a divisional of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/031,290, filed on Sep. 19, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein, which is a continuation-in-part application of, and claims the benefit of priority to, the following applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/005,852, filed on Sep. 18, 2013, which is a US National Stage Application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT Application number PCT/US2012/030210, filed on Mar. 22, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/005,850, filed on Sep. 18, 2013, which is a US National Stage Application under 37 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT Application number PCT/US2011/033912, filed on Apr. 26, 2011; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/567,707, filed on Aug. 6, 2012, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,647,844 on Feb. 11, 2014, and which is a divisional application of and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/029,263, filed on Feb. 17, 2011, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,257,948 on Sep. 4, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/589,754, filed on Aug. 20, 2012, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,735,101 on May 27, 2014, and which is a continuation application of and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/074,179, filed on Mar. 29, 2011, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,318,459 on Nov. 27, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/841,261, filed on Mar. 15, 2013; and U.S. Provisional Patent application No. 61/725,233, filed on Nov. 12, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2500173 | Gisvold | Mar 1950 | A |
2615015 | Wilson | Oct 1952 | A |
3723410 | Persinos | Mar 1973 | A |
4082858 | Morita et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4112218 | Inoue et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4171430 | Ikushigetetsuo et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4219571 | Miyake | Aug 1980 | A |
4361697 | Dobberstein et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4454290 | Dubois | Jun 1984 | A |
4590160 | Nishihashi et al. | May 1986 | A |
4599403 | Kumar | Jul 1986 | A |
4612942 | Dobberstein et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4657638 | Le Grand et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4892938 | Giovanetto | Jan 1990 | A |
4915969 | Beyts | Apr 1990 | A |
4917916 | Hirao et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5112610 | Kienle | May 1992 | A |
5576042 | Fuisz | Nov 1996 | A |
5779805 | Morano | Jul 1998 | A |
5830523 | Takaichi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5962678 | Payzant et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972120 | Kutowy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6031157 | Morita et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6080561 | Morita et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6204377 | Nishimoto et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228996 | Zhou et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6318157 | Corso et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6706304 | Ishida et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7807206 | Magomet et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7838044 | Abelyan et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7862845 | Magomet et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8030481 | Prakash et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8257948 | Markosyan | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8318459 | Markosyan | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8647844 | Markosyan | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8669077 | Markosyan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8735101 | Markosyan | May 2014 | B2 |
8911971 | Markosyan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8993269 | Markosyan | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9055761 | Markosyan | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9107436 | Purkayastha et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9585420 | Purkayastha et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
20020132320 | Wang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020187232 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197371 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030161876 | Hansson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030232118 | Lerchenfeld et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236399 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20060083838 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060134292 | Abelyan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142555 | Jonnala et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070082102 | Magomet et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082103 | Magomet et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082106 | Lee et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070116800 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116819 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116820 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116821 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116822 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116823 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116824 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116825 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116826 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116827 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116828 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116829 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116830 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116831 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116832 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116833 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116834 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116835 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116836 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116837 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116838 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116839 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116840 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116841 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128311 | Prakash et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134390 | Prakash et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134391 | Prakash et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070224321 | Prakash et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070292582 | Prakash et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080064063 | Brandle et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080102497 | Wong et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080107775 | Prakash et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080107776 | Prakash et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080107787 | Prakash et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108710 | Prakash et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111269 | Politi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080226770 | Lee et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080226797 | Lee et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080292764 | Prakash et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292765 | Prakash et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292775 | Prakash et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300402 | Yang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090017185 | Catani | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090053378 | Prakash et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090074935 | Lee | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079935 | Harris et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104330 | Zasypkin | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090142817 | Norman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162499 | McArdle et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090226590 | Fouache et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090324793 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100055752 | Kumar | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100056472 | Duan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100099857 | Evans et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100057024 | Cavallini | May 2010 | A1 |
20100112175 | Abelyan et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120710 | Watanabe et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137569 | Prakash et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100018986 | Abelyan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100166679 | Abelyan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189861 | Abelyan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100227034 | Purkayastha et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100255171 | Purkayastha et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278993 | Prakash et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100316782 | Shi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110030457 | Valery et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033525 | Liu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110092684 | Abelyan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110104353 | Lee | May 2011 | A1 |
20110111115 | Shi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124587 | Jackson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110163011 | Prakash | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110183056 | Morita et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110189360 | Yoo et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110195169 | Markosyan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224168 | Szente | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120157553 | Dewis et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164678 | Stephanopoulos et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120214751 | Markosyan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120214752 | Markosyan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120301589 | Markosyan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130030060 | Markosyan | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130064955 | Miguel et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130347140 | Wang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140017378 | Purkayastha et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140271996 | Prakash et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140357588 | Markosyan et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150031868 | Lehmann et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150157045 | Markosyan | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20170190728 | Markosyan | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180079767 | Markosyan et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1049666 | Mar 1991 | CN |
1100727 | Mar 1995 | CN |
1112565 | Nov 1995 | CN |
1192447 | Sep 1998 | CN |
1238341 | May 2002 | CN |
1349997 | May 2002 | CN |
101200480 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101591365 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101628924 | Jan 2010 | CN |
0957178 | Apr 1999 | EP |
2433505 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2510800 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2027423 | Feb 1980 | GB |
52005800 | Jan 1977 | JP |
52083731 | Jul 1977 | JP |
52100500 | Aug 1977 | JP |
52136200 | Nov 1977 | JP |
54030199 | Mar 1979 | JP |
54132599 | Oct 1979 | JP |
55039731 | Mar 1980 | JP |
55081567 | Jun 1980 | JP |
55092400 | Jul 1980 | JP |
55120770 | Sep 1980 | JP |
55138372 | Oct 1980 | JP |
55159770 | Dec 1980 | JP |
55162953 | Dec 1980 | JP |
56099768 | Aug 1981 | JP |
56109568 | Aug 1981 | JP |
56121453 | Sep 1981 | JP |
56121454 | Sep 1981 | JP |
56121455 | Sep 1981 | JP |
56160962 | Dec 1981 | JP |
57002656 | Jan 1982 | JP |
57005663 | Jan 1982 | JP |
57046998 | Mar 1982 | JP |
57075992 | May 1982 | JP |
57086264 | May 1982 | JP |
58020170 | Feb 1983 | JP |
58028246 | Feb 1983 | JP |
58028247 | Feb 1983 | JP |
S5878562 | May 1983 | JP |
58212759 | Dec 1983 | JP |
58212760 | Dec 1983 | JP |
59045848 | Mar 1984 | JP |
S5948059 | Mar 1984 | JP |
59183670 | Oct 1984 | JP |
66037950 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60188035 | Sep 1985 | JP |
62166861 | Jul 1987 | JP |
63173531 | Jul 1988 | JP |
1131191 | May 1989 | JP |
H0383558 | Apr 1991 | JP |
3262458 | Nov 1991 | JP |
6007108 | Jan 1994 | JP |
H4-322220 | May 1994 | JP |
H4-322220 | May 1994 | JP |
6192283 | Jul 1994 | JP |
7143860 | Jun 1995 | JP |
7177862 | Jul 1995 | JP |
8000214 | Jan 1996 | JP |
9107913 | Apr 1997 | JP |
2000236842 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000270804 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2002045145 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002262822 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2010516764 | May 2010 | JP |
20070067199 | Jun 2007 | KR |
20080071605 | Aug 2008 | KR |
10088869 | Mar 2009 | KR |
20090021386 | Mar 2009 | KR |
2111969 | May 1998 | RU |
2123267 | Dec 1998 | RU |
2156083 | Sep 2000 | RU |
2167544 | May 2001 | RU |
2198548 | Feb 2003 | RU |
2002087359 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2005089483 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006072878 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006072879 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007061795 | May 2007 | WO |
2008091547 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008112966 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009071277 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009108680 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009140394 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010038911 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010118218 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010146463 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011046423 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011059954 | May 2011 | WO |
2011183056 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011097359 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011112892 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011153378 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012006728 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012082493 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012082677 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012088593 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO-2012088593 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012102769 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012112180 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012125991 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012129451 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012166163 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2012166164 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2012177727 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013022989 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2014122328 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013096420 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013110673 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013176738 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014122227 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014146089 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014146135 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014193888 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2016023103 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016187559 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017160846 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jaitak, et al., “An Efficient Microwave-assisted Extraction Process of Stevioside and Rebaudioside-A from Stevia Rebaudiana (Bertoni)”, Phytochem. Anal, vol. 20 2009, 240-245. |
Kennelly, “Sweet and non-sweet constituents of Stevia rebaudiana”, Stevia: The genus Stevia, Taylor & Francis, 2002, 68-85. |
Kinghorn, “Overview”, Stevia: The genus Stevia, Taylor & Francis, 2002, 1-17. |
Kitahata, S. et al., “Production of Rubusoside Derivatives by Transgalactosylation of Various b-Galactosidases” Agric. Biol. Chem., vol. 53, No. 11 1989, 2923-2928. |
Kobayashi, et al., “Dulcoside A and B, New diterpene glycosides from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 16 1977, 1405-1408. |
Kochikyan , et al. ,“Combined Enzymatic Modification of Stevioside and Rebaudioside A”, Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, vol. 42, No. 1, 2006, 31-37. |
Kohda, et al., “New sweet diterpene glucosides from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 15 1976, 981-983. |
Kovylyaeva, et al., “Glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana”, Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 43, No. 1 2007, 81-85. |
Li, Sha et al.; “Transglycosylation of stevioside to improve the edulcorant quality by lower substitution using cornstarch hydrolysate and CGTase”, Food Chemistry, vol. 138, No. 2, Nov. 12, 2012, pp. 2064-2069, XP028977479, ISSN: 0308-8146, DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2012.10.124. |
Liu, et al., “Study of stevioside preparation by membrane separation process”, Desalination, vol. 83 1991, 375-382. |
Lobov, S. V. et al., “Enzymic Production of Sweet Stevioside Derivatives: Transglucosylation of Glucosidases”, Agric. Biol. Chem., vol. 55, No. 12 1991, 2959-2965. |
Markovic et al., “Chemical composition of leaf extracts of Stevia rebaudiana Bergoni grown experimentally in Vogvodina”, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 73 (3) 283-297 (2008). |
Montovaneli, et al., “The effect of temperature and flow rate on the clarification of the aqueous Stevia-extract in fixed-bed column with zeolites”, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 21, No. 3 2004, 449-458. |
Moraes, et al., “Clarification of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni extract adsorption in modified zeolites”, Acta Scientiarum, vol. 23, No. 6 2001, 1375-1380. |
News Bites, GLG announces high purity REB M GRAS notification with FDA. Consumer Durables & Apparel Melbourne. Apr. 15, 2014. pp. 1-2. especially, p. 1, para 5; p. 2, para 1. |
Ohio “14.0 Spray Drying and Spray Dryers”, pp. 1-10, http://elasslst.ohio-state-edu/DairyTech/14Spraydrying.htm Nov. 2, 2009 as obtained by internetarchive.org. |
Ohta et al., “Characterization of Novel Steviol Glycosides from Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana Morita,” J. Appl. Glycosi., vol. 57, 199-209, 2010. |
Ohtani et al. “Chapter 7. Methods to improve the taste of the sweet principles of Stevia rebaudiana.” The Genus Stevia, edited by A. Douglas Kinghom, CRC Press 2001, Taylor and Francis, London and New York, pp. 138-159. |
Philips, K.C. “Stevia: steps in developing a new sweetener”, In T.H. Grenby, Editor, Developments in Sweeteners-3, Elsevier 1987, 1-43. |
Pol, et al., “Characterisation of Stevia Rebaudiana by comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, 1150 (2007) 85-92. |
Pol, et al., “Comparison of two different solvents employed for pressurised fluid extraction of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana: methanol versus water”, Anal Bioanal Chem vol. 388 2007, 1847-1857. |
Prakash et al. “Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Rebaudioside M Isomer from a Bioconversion Reaction of Rebaudioside A and NMR Comparison Studies of Rebaudioside M Isolated from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and Stevia rebaudiana Morita,” Biomolecules, vol. 4, 2014, 374-389, p. 385 para 5. |
Prakash et al., “Development of Next Generation Stevia Sweetener: Rebaudioside M” Foods 2014, 3, 162-175, ISSN 2304-8158. |
Prakash et al., “Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener,” Jul. 1, 2008, Food and Chemical Toxology, vol. 46, Is. 7, Sup. 1, p. S75-S82. |
Rajbhandari et al., “The Flavonoids of Stevia Rebaudiana”, Department of Pharmacognosy, Mar.-Apr. 1983, pp. 194-195. |
Ramirez, I.; “Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats”, Physiology & Behaviour, 1994, 55(2), pp. 355-360 (Abstract only). |
Rebaudioside A and Stevia Extract, Internet Citation, 2007 fittp://emperorsherbotogist.comirebaudioside_a:php. p. 1-3. |
Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 21st Edition. The University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, 2006. Part 5, p. 700. |
Richman et al., “Fuctional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides of Stevia rebaudiana,” The Plant Journal, vol. 41 (2005) 56-67. |
Sakamoto et al., “Application of 13C NMR Spectroscopy to Chemistry of Natural Glycosides: Rebaudioside-C, a New Sweet Diterpene Glycoside of Stevia Rebaudiana”, Chem. Pharm. Bull., vol. 25, 1977, 844-846. |
Shi, et al. “Synthesis of bifuntional polymeric adsorbent and its application in purification of Stevia glycosides”, Reactive & functional Polymers, vol. 50 2002, 107-116. |
Shibata et al. “Glucosylation of Steviol and Steviol-Glucosides in Extracts from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni,” Plant Physiol. vol. 95, (1991) 152-156. |
Starratt, et al. “Rebaudioside F, a diterpene glycoside from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 59 2002, 367-370. |
R. Kasai, N. Kaneda, O. Tanaka, K. Yamasaki, I. Sakamoto, K. Morimoto, S. Okada, S. Kitahata, H. Furukawa, “Sweet Diterpene Glycoside of Stevia Leaves” Nippon Kagokukaishi (1981), (5), 726-735. |
Sweet Green Fields, LLC “Notice to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that the use of Rebiana (Rebaudiosid A) derived from Stevia rebaudiana, as a Food Ingredient is Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS),” Jan. 15, 2009, http:/www.accessdata.fda.goviscripts/fcn/gras_notices/gm000282.pdf (obtained from the Web on May 8, 2012) entire document esp. p. 22, Table 1. |
Tanaka, 0., “Improvement of taste of natural sweeteners,” Pure & Appl. Chem., vol. 69, No. 4 1997, 675-683. |
Teo, et al. “Validation of green-solvent extraction combined with Chromatographic chemical fingerprint to evaluate quality of Stevia reaudiana Bertoni”, J. Sep. Sci, vol. 32 2009, 613-622. |
Toyo sugar, “GRAS Exemption Claim for a-Glucosylated Steviol Glycosides” Office of Food Additive Safety. Feb. 23, 2011. |
UN “Steviol Glycosides” JECFA 2008 pp. 1-4, UN “Steviol Glycosides” JECFA 2008 pp. 1-4 http://www.fao,org/agiaa,n/lecfa-additives/specs/monograph5/additive-442-m5.pdf. |
United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization/Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (2010) Steviol Glycosides, Compendium of Food Additive Specifications, FAO JECFA Monographs 10, 17-21. |
Van der Maarel et al., “Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the a-amylase family,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 94 (220) 137-155. |
Vasquez et al., Stimulation of the Gerbil's Gustatory Receptors by Some Potently Sweet Terpenoids, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 41, 1305-1310, 1993. |
Wallin, “Steviol glycosides,” 2004, XP002740430 ftp://11p.fao.orgfes/esnijeca/cta/CTA63 Steviol.pdf, pp. 1,4, 5. Retrieved 2015. |
Yamamoto, K. et al., “Effective Production of Glycosyl-steviosides by a-1, 6 Transglucosylation of Dextrin Dextranase”, Biosci, Biotech, Biochem. vol. 58, No. 9 1994, 1657-1661. |
Ye, et al. “Modification of stevioside using transglucosylation activity of Bacilllus amyloliquefaciens a-amylase to reduce its bitter aftertaste,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 51, Issue 1, May 2013, pp. 524-530. |
Voda, et al. “Supercritical fluid extraction from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using CO2 and CO2+ water: extraction kinetics and identification of extracted components”, Journal of Food Entineerint, vol. 57 2003, 125-134. |
Yoshikawa, et al. “Transglycosylation of Mogroside V, a Triterpene Glycoside in Siraitia grosvenori, by Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase and Improvement of the Qualities of Sweetness,” The Japanese Society of Applied Glycoscience, vol. 52, No. 3, 2005, 8.247-252. |
Zell, et al. “Investigation of Polymorphism in Aspartame and Neotame Using Solid State NMR Spectroscopy”, Tetrahedron, vol. 56, 2000, 6603-6616. |
Zhang et al. “Membrane-based separation scheme for processing sweetener from Stevia leaves”, Food Research International, vol. 33 2000, 617-620. |
Database WPI, 0, Derwent World Patents Index, vol. 2001, No. 05, Database accession No. 2001-034294, XP002729277 & JP2000236842 A 20000905 (Nippon Seishi KK) [X] 1-10. |
“Acetone”. Available online from Sigma-Aldrich as of Jan. 4, 2016. pp. 1-2. |
“Methanol”. Available online from Sigma-Aldrich as of Jan. 4, 2016. pp. 1-2. |
“Recrystallization Technique: Proper purification of crystalline solids”. Available online as of Dec. 4, 2009 from www.erowid.org. pp. 1-3. |
“Toxicity, Alcohols”. Available online as of Jan. 29, 2010 from emedicine.medscape.com. pp. 1-4. |
A-Glucosyltransferase Treated Stevia, Japan's Specifications and Standards for Food Additives, VIII edition, 2009, p. 257. |
Ahmed, et al., “Use of p-Bromophenacyl Bromide to Enhance Ultraviolet Detection of Water-Soluble Organic Acids (Steviolbioside and Rebaudioside B) in High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis”, Journal of Chromatography, vol. 192, 1980, 387-393. |
Bae S. et al.; “Manufacturing enzymatically modified Stevia for use in food and drink e.g. alcoholic beverage and for use as sweetening agent, flavor enhancer and reagent, involves adding cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase and Stevia extract in solvent”, WPI/THOMSON, vol. 2009, No. 60, Mar. 16, 2009, XP002729278. |
Chang, S. S. et al., “Stability Studies of Stevioside and Rebaudioside A in Carbonated Beverages”, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 31, 1983, 409-412. |
Chatsudthipong, et al. Stevioside and related compounds: Therapeutic benefits beyond sweetness, pp. 41-45 Pharmacology & Therapeutics 121 (2009). |
Chaturvedula et al., “Structures of the novel diterpene glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana”, Carbohydrate Research 346 (2011) pp. 1057-1060. |
Chaturvedula et al., “Two Minor Diterpene Glycosides from the Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana”, Natural Product Communications, 2011, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 175-178. |
Chen, et al., “Enrichment and separation of rebaudioside A from stevia glycosides by a novel adsorbent with pyridyl group”, Science in China, vol. 42, No. 3 1999, 277-282. |
Chen, et al., “Selectivity of polymer adsorbent in adsorptive separations of stevia diterpene glycisides”, Science in China, vol. 41, No. 4 1998, 436-441. |
Chen, et al., “Studies on the adsorptive selectivity of the polar resin with carbonyl group on rebaudioside A”, Acta Polymeric Scnica, No. 4 1999, 398-403. |
Crammer, et al., “Sweet glycosides from the Stevia plant”, Chemistry in Britain, Oct. 1986, 915-916, 918. |
Darise et al., “Enzymic Transglucosylation of Rubusoside and the Structure-Sweetness Relationship of Steviol Bisglycosides,” Agric. Biol. Chern. Vol 48(10), 1984, 2483-2488. |
Koyama, E. et al., “In vitro metabolism of the glycosidic sweeteners, stevia mixture and enzymatically modified stevia in human intestinal microflora” Food and Chemical Toxicology (2003), 41, 359-374. |
Dubois et al., “Diterpenoid Sweeteners. Synthesis and Sensory Evaluation of Stevioside Analogues with improved Organoleptic Properties,” J. Med. Chem. vol. 28, (1985) 93-98. |
FAO/WHO “Combined Compendium of Food Additive Specifications” FAO JECFA Monographs 1, vol. 4, 2006, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. |
Fuh, “Purification of steviosides by membrane and ion exchange process”, Journal of Food Science, vol. 55, No. 5 1990, 1454-1457. |
Fukunaga et al., “Enzymic Transglucosylation Products of Stevioside: Separation and Sweetness-evaluation,” Agric. Biol, Chem. vol. 53(6) (1989) 1603-1607. |
Fullas et al., “Separation of natural product sweetening agents using overpressured layer chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography vol. 464 (1989) 213-219. |
Gorden et al. (“Supersaturation” Access Science McGraw Hill 2008, p. 1, http://www.accessscience.com/content/supersaturation/670000). |
Goyal et al., “Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) a bio-sweetener: a review”, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Feb. 2010; 61(1): pp. 1-10. |
Hale, et al., “Amylase of Bacillus Macerans”, Cereal Chemistry, vol. 28, No. I, Jan. 1951, 49-58. |
Harman et al. “Sensory Testing for Flavorings with Modifying Properties”, ift.org, No. 2013, vol. 67, No. 11, 15 pages. |
Hartel, Richard “Crystallization in Foods” Handbook of Industrial Crystallization Elsevier 2002, pp. 287 and 293-296. |
Huang, X Y, et al. “Preparative isolation and purification of steviol glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using high-speed counter-current chromatogoraphy” Separation and Purification Technology Elsevier Science, Netherlands, vol. 71, No. 2, 2010, p. 220-224. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2010/055960. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/028028. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033734. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033737. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033912. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/035173. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/036063. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/047498. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/047499. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/064343. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/024585. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/024722. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/030210. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/043294. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/051163. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052659. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052665. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/030439. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2014/041548. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2014056451. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2015/047234. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2018/053258. |
Mizutani, K., et al., “Study on Improvement of Sweetness of Steviol Bisglycosides Selective Enzymic Transglucosylation of the 13-0-Glycosyl Moiety” Agric. Biol. Chem., (1989), 52(2), 395-398. |
Kinghorn, A Douglas (ed), Stevia, Taylor & Francis (London & New York) 213pp. (2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200221744 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61725233 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14742457 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15437208 | US | |
Parent | 14031290 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14742457 | US | |
Parent | 13029263 | Feb 2011 | US |
Child | 13567707 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16553975 | Aug 2019 | US |
Child | 16835103 | US | |
Parent | 15437208 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 16553975 | US | |
Parent | 13074179 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13589754 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14005852 | US | |
Child | 14031290 | US | |
Parent | 14005850 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14031290 | Sep 2013 | US |
Parent | PCT/US2011/033912 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 14005852 | Sep 2013 | US |
Parent | 13567707 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14031290 | Sep 2013 | US |
Parent | 13589754 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14031290 | Sep 2013 | US |
Parent | 13841261 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14031290 | Sep 2013 | US |