Glucosylated steviol glycoside as a flavor modifier

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11690391
  • Patent Number
    11,690,391
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 30, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 4, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A taste and flavor profile modifying composition is described. The composition includes a blend of glycosylated steviol glycosides and residual steviol glycosides which can modify the intensity of a taste and/or flavor in a food or beverage product.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to glucosylated steviol glycoside compositions and methods for making and using them as a taste improver and flavor modifier in various food and beverage products. The invention also relates to a combination of selective combination of glucosylated steviol glycoside components and steviol glycoside molecules from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant extract to make the optimum sweetness profile and flavor modification in food and beverage applications. The invention also relates to the combination of the steviol glycoside derived molecules and maltodextrin derived from starch to provide the mouthfeel and flavor modification characteristics of Glucosylated steviol Glycosides in reduced or no sugar added food and beverage products.


Description of the Related Art

The extract of Stevia rebaudiana plant contains a mixture of different sweet diterpene glycosides, which have a single base—steviol and differ by the presence of carbohydrate residues at positions C13 and C19. These glycosides accumulate in Stevia leaves and compose approximately 10%-20% of the total dry weight. Depending on the variety of Stevia plant, the major steviol glycoside molecules present in the stevia extract are stevioside, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside C, Dulcoside A, Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside B and Rebaudioside F. Other minor components are Rebaudioside E, Steviolbioside and Rubusoside. Recent research found additional steviol glycoside molecules (Ohta et al, 2010; Prakash et al, 2013): Rebaudioside G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, and O.


All steviol glycoside molecules have high intensity of sweetness, ranging between 50 to 400 times sweeter than sugar. However, apart from the high level of sweetness, they have also intrinsic properties of bitter and licorice taste and undesirable aftertaste. Some undesirable taste characteristics of glycosides can be as a result of contamination of other substances present in stevia extract.


One of the main ways to improve the taste quality is the enzymatic glycosylation of mixture of semi-purified steviol glycosides. It is known that the undesired taste attributes can be substantially reduced or eliminated by the reaction of intermolecular transglycosylation of various enzymes, upon which the attachment of new carbohydrates at positions C13 and C19 of steviol glycosides takes place (FIGS. 1A-B). With an increase in the number of glucose units in steviol glycoside molecules (for example, from stevioside to Rebaudioside A), the sweetness intensity increases and sweetness profile (taste) improves. However, the relative sweetness does not increase significantly beyond a certain level with a further increase of glucose units, as shown in FIG. 2. The published data show that the sweetness quality improves with the addition of glucose units, but does not explicitly or implicitly mention that the addition of glucose units contributes to a reduction of sweetness.


In this invention, a process is developed to make a mixture of glucosylated steviol glycosides with small amount of other steviol glycosides and maltodextrin. The process involved precise control of pH, temperature, enzyme source and activity, quality of stevia extract, glucose-donor (amount and source) and time to achieve blends of different ratios of glucosylated steviol glycosides, steviol glycoside molecules, and maltodextrin.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a taste and flavor profile improving composition. The composition includes glucosylated steviol glycosides, steviol glycosides and maltodextrin. In some embodiments, the glucosylated steviol glycosides may include a plurality of glucose units. For example, the glucosylated steviol glycosides may include three, four, five, or more than five glucose units (FIGS. 1A-B).


The invention, in part, pertains to an ingredient containing glucosylated steviol glycoside (GSG) of different degree of glycosylation to steviol glycoside molecules derived from stevia extract of Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni plant. Also, this invention, in part, pertains to specific blends of GSG components with varying degree of glycosylation.


The invention, in part, pertains to an ingredient comprising steviol glycosides of Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni plant. The steviol glycosides are selected from the group consisting of stevioside, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside B, Rebaudioside C, Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside E, Rebaudioside F, dulcoside A, steviolbioside, rubusoside, as well as other steviol glycosides found in Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni plant and mixtures thereof. Rebaudioside is commonly expressed as Reb or reb also.


The invention, in part, pertains to specific blends of different steviol glycosides (SG) and glucosylated steviol glycosides (GSG) for producing an ingredient containing Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside B, stevioside, Rebaudioside C, and other steviol glycosides found in Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni plant and mixtures thereof.


The invention, in part, pertains to specific blends of different GSG, SG components and residual maltodextrins derived from starch, which is used as glucose-donor. The source of starch, such as, but not limited to, tapioca, maize, wheat, potato, barley, sweet potato and other commercial and non-commercial carbohydrate source.


The present invention is also directed to a process to make the different blends of GSG and SG from stevia extracts of different amount and mixture of steviol glycosides. The process conditions, type and ratio of stevia extract and starch used are crucial for making the composition, which will yield different amount and composition of GSG, SG and maltodextrin.


The invention, in part, pertains to a process of manufacturing the specific blend of GSG components, selected steviol glycosides (SG) and maltodextrin. The processing steps include:

    • i) Tapioca starch is dissolved in RO water and liquefied by CGTase under controlled processing conditions
    • ii) The stevia extract with total steviol glycosides content between 75% and 99% is added to liquefied starch.
    • iii) The starch to stevia extract ratio was optimized between 35:65 and 65:35
    • iv) CGTase enzyme added to mixture and incubated at 60° C. for a desired length of reaction time to glycosylate steviol glycosides with glucose molecules derived from Tapioca starch.
    • v) After desired ratio of GSG and residual steviol glycoside contents achieved, the reaction mixture is heated to 100° C. for 15 min to inactivate the CGTase, which is then removed by treating with activated carbon.
    • vi) The resulting solution of GSG, residual steviol glycosides and maltodextrin is concentrated by means of conventional vacuum evaporator and dried.


The present invention is also directed to a food or beverage product having an intense taste and flavor profile, wherein the food or beverage product includes a taste and flavor modifying composition comprising glucosylated steviol glycosides, selected steviol glycosides and maltodextrins. A wide range of food and beverage products, such as, but not limited to, carbonated soft drinks, fruit juices, dairy foods, dairy beverages, baked goods, cereal products, and table top sweeteners, may be made in accordance with the present invention. The taste and flavor profile of a food or beverage product including a taste and flavor modifying composition, wherein the taste and flavor modifying composition includes the blend of glucosylated steviol glycosides, steviol glycosides and maltodextrin, may be more intense than a comparative taste and flavor profile of a comparative food or beverage product which does not include the taste and flavor modifying composition. Moreover, the mouthfeel of a food or beverage product including the taste and flavor modifying composition, wherein the taste and flavor modifying composition includes glucosylated steviol glycosides, selected steviol glycosides and maltodextrins, may be improved in relation to a mouthfeel of a comparative food or beverage product which does not include the taste and flavor modifying composition.


The present invention is further directed to a method of enhancing the taste and flavor intensity of a food or beverage product, including the step of adding a taste and flavor modifying composition to the food or beverage product, wherein the taste and flavor modifying composition includes the blend of glucosylated steviol glycosides, selected steviol glycosides and maltodextrins.


The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features of the invention which form the subject of the claims of the invention will be described hereinafter. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other methods or structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.


The compositions can be used as flavor modifier in various food and beverage products. Non-limiting examples of beverage products include carbonated and still beverages, flavored water, juice-based beverages, energy drinks and powder soft drinks. Non-limiting examples of food include dairy products (yogurt, yogurt drinks, flavored milk, frozen dairy desserts including ice cream), baked goods and baking mixes (bread, biscuits, cookies, muffins, rolls, and baking mixes), sauces and gravies, jams and jellies, gelatins, puddings and fillings, soy sauce and other soy based products, breakfast cereals, condiments and relishes, confections and frostings, processed fruits and vegetables, sugar substitutes and confectionery products including chewing gums.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the embodiments of the invention.



FIGS. 1A-B illustrates the glycosylation steps for making different glucosylated steviol glycoside molecules from stevioside. FIG. 1A shows the single glycosylation of stevioside. FIG. 1B shows multiple glycosylation.



FIG. 2 is a graph of the sweetness potency, or sucrose equivalent value (SEV), of steviol glycosides and Glucosylated steviol glycosides at a 5% sugar sweetness level.



FIG. 3 shows the impact of degree of glucosylation on the perception of sweetness and flavor profile of a typical beverage application.



FIG. 4 shows the impact of GSG components on the perception of sweetness and bitterness in beverage application.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It has been unexpectedly discovered that glycosylation of steviol glycosides beyond a certain number of glucose units effectively reduces sweetness. It has also been discovered that with the reduction of sweetness, the glucosylated steviol glycosides (hereinafter “GSG”) can contribute to the modification of flavor and sweetness profiles in a wide range of food and beverage applications.


It has also been discovered that the modification of flavor and sweetness profile is affected by the composition of the blend of GSG, steviol glycosides (SG) and maltodextrin. The size and amount of GSG molecules and the type and amount of residual steviol glycoside (SG) contribute different degree of flavor modification. Therefore, while sweetness decreases with glycosylation, flavor modification increases. The flavor modification may include an increase (enhance) in certain flavor note and/or reduction (suppress) of certain other flavor notes. The blend of GSG and SG provides a certain amount of sweetness, but the present invention shows that such blends modify the flavor and sweetness profile in a wide range of food and beverage applications.


The present invention pertains to a process where the blend of specific type and content of GSG and SG made from Tapioca starch and stevia extract, which contains total steviol glycoside content from 50 to 100%, with predominant steviol glycoside molecules of stevioside, Reb A, Reb B, Reb C and Reb D. The specific type of GSG means GSG molecules derived from steviol glycosides with different degree of glycosylation, resulting number of additional glucose units added to base steviol glycoside molecules. The type of residual steviol glycosides means the unreacted residual steviol glycosides, which may be stevioside, Reb A, Reb B, Reb C, Reb D and other steviol glycoside molecules present in the stevia extract.


The present invention also pertains to the specific composition of blends, where the type and amount of different GSG molecules and SG molecules contribute different degree of taste modification in the food and beverage applications.


Advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.


The compositions can be used as flavor and sweetness profile modifier in various food and beverage products. Non-limiting examples of food and beverage products include carbonated soft drinks, ready to drink beverages, energy drinks, isotonic drinks, low-calorie drinks, zero-calorie drinks, sports drinks, teas, fruit and vegetable juices, juice drinks, dairy drinks, yoghurt drinks, alcohol beverages, powdered beverages, bakery products, cookies, biscuits, baking mixes, cereals, confectioneries, candies, toffees, chewing gum, dairy products, flavored milk, yoghurts, flavored yoghurts, cultured milk, soy sauce and other soy base products, salad dressings, mayonnaise, vinegar, frozen-desserts, meat products, fish-meat products, bottled and canned foods, tabletop sweeteners, fruits and vegetables.


Additionally the compositions can be used in drug or pharmaceutical preparations and cosmetics, including but not limited to toothpaste, mouthwash, cough syrup, chewable tablets, lozenges, vitamin preparations, and the like.


The compositions can be used “as-is” or in combination with other sweeteners, sugar alcohols, flavors and food ingredients in food, beverage, pharmaceutical and cosmetics applications.


The following examples illustrate various embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the materials, proportions, conditions and procedures set forth in the examples, which are only illustrative.


Example 1

Preparation of the Blend of Steviol Glycosides and Glucosylated Steviol Glycosides


Several compositions containing blends of different GSG and SG components were prepared from stevia extract and starch. The samples as outlined below were produced by treating the raw materials, steviol glycosides extracted from the Stevia plant, and starch extracted from tapioca, with a natural enzyme. The enzyme transfers glucose units from starch to the steviol glycosides. The enzyme used to facilitate this transfer is produced by means of fermentation using non-GMO (non-genetically modified organism) bacteria. Specifically, FIG. 1A illustrates the single glycosylation (G1) of a stevioside molecule. This process can yield multiple glycosylation (G2, G3, etc.) of different steviol glycosides (mainly stevioside and Rebaudioside A) present in stevia extract as shown in FIG. 1B.


Manufacturing steps for blends of GSG and SG

    • a) Tapioca starch is dissolved in RO water and liquefied by CGTase under controlled processing conditions,
    • b) The stevia extract with total steviol glycosides content between 75% and 99% is added to liquefied starch.
    • c) The starch to stevia extract ratio was optimized between 35:65 and 65:35. The ratio was closer to 50/50 ratio for the majority of samples.


d) CGTase (cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase) enzyme added to mixture and incubated at 60° C. for a desired length of reaction time to glycosylate steviol glycosides with glucose molecules derived from Tapioca starch.

    • e) After the desired ratio of GSG and residual steviol glycoside contents achieved, the reaction mixture is heated to 100° C. for 15 min to inactivate the CGTase, which is then removed by treating with activated carbon.
    • f) The resulting solution of GSG, residual steviol glycosides and maltodextrin is concentrated by means of conventional vacuum evaporator and dried.









TABLE 1







Composition of Glucosyl Steviol Glycosides &


Steviol Glycosides in Flavor composition









Composition (dry basis)












GSG
SG Content,


Blends

Stevia Extract Used

Content
Predominant SG





GSG-S
TSG > 95%, RA > 50%
>95%
<5%, Reb A


GSG-M
TSG > 95%, RA > 50%
>75%
<8%, Reb A


GSG-L
TSG > 95%, RA > 50%
>75%
<10%, Reb A 


GSG-RA
TSG > 95%, RA > 95%
>75%
<8%, Reb A


GSG-SW
TSG > 75%, ST > 50%
>75%
   <8%, Stevioside









Example 2

Evaluation of Iso-Sweetness of Different Blends of GSG & SG


To determine the concentration of the blends (Table 1) at which barely any sweetness perception is detected, a series of samples of each blend (Concentration ranging between 40 mg/L and 140 mg/L) were prepared and tested against 1% sugar solution. The test parameters and results are outlined in Tables 2 & 3, respectively.









TABLE 2





Methodology used for determining the


iso-sweetness of blends at 1% sugar solution
















Nature of Participants:
Company employees


Number of Sessions
1


Number of Participants:
25


Test Design:
2 - AFC, Balanced, randomized



within pair. Blind


Sensory Test Method:
Intensity ratings


Environmental Condition
Standard booth lighting


Attributes and Scales:
Which sample is sweeter?


Statistical Analysis:
Paired comparison Test


Sample Size
~1.5 oz. in a clear capped plastic cup


Serving Temperature
Room temperature (~70° F.)


Serving/Panelists Instruction:
Samples served simultaneously.



Panelists instructed to read



ingredient statement,



evaluate each sample.
















TABLE 3







Sweetness equivalence at 1% sugar equivalent sweetness in water











Concentration



Blends
(mg/L)













GSG-S
63



GSG-M
80



GSG-L
120



GSG-RA
82



GSG-SW
80









Example 3

Evaluation and Comparison of Sweetness of the GSG+SG Composition with Selected Commercial Steviol Glycoside Samples


To evaluate the iso-sweetness of steviol glycosides (SG) and glucosylated steviol glycosides (GSG), a series of stevia derived samples were selected as shown in Table 4. To evaluate the sweetness potency of various concentrations of stevia products in aqueous solutions, aqueous solutions of sugar, stevioside, Rebaudioside A (Reb A), Rebaudioside D (Reb D), GSG-S (contains mainly smaller GSGs with 1 or 2 glucose units added to SG), GSG-M and GSG-L at various concentrations were prepared using bottled water. Samples were evaluated by the judges at room temperature (70-72° F.).













TABLE 4











Glucosylated Steviol





Residual
Glycosides with





Steviol
added glucose unit













Test
Molecular
Steviol
Glyco-
G1 &




Ingredients
Wt (avg)
equivalent
sides
G2
G3-G9
G10-G20





Stevioside
 805
0.396
>99%





Reb A
 967
0.329
>99%





Reb D
1129
0.282
>99%





GSG-S
1210
0.263
<10%
95%




GSG-M
1380
0.231
 <8%
42%
50%



GSG-L
1798
0.177
 <6%
19%
60%
16%









The judges were 11 panelists that have been previously qualified for their taste acuity and trained in the use of a sweetness intensity rating scale. The evaluations were done in duplicate using the same panelists so that a total of 22 values were generated for each average data point. Prior to the conduct of the study, judges were trained with sugar solutions and the use of the ballot.


Samples were given to the judges sequentially and coded with triple digit numbers. The order of sample presentation was randomized to avoid order of presentation bias. A rest period of five minutes was provided between samples. Water and unsalted crackers were provided in order to cleanse the palate.


Results were statistically analyzed to generate a standard error value for each solution as well as a confidence level at a 95% level. By comparing the sweetness of each test ingredient to the sweetness of several sucrose solutions, the sweetness potency (at 5% sucrose equivalent) and concentration of each stevia ingredient was estimated as shown in FIG. 2. The sweetness equivalence of stevia ingredient at 5% sucrose-level is commercially relevant. This figure shows the effect of glycosylation on the SEV of steviol glycosides. The sweetness increases from stevioside to Reb A and then starts decreasing as more glucose units are added to the base molecules (stevioside and Reb A).


Example 4

Effect of Glycosylation on Flavor Modification of No-Sugar-Added Beverage


A mango-passion fruit flavored water formula was developed to evaluate the effect of different stevia ingredients on the sweetness and flavor profile of the beverage. A total of 9-10 panel members participated in this sensory test, where they assigned relative values to sweetness, onset of sweetness, mango fruit flavor, passion fruit flavor, acidity, overall taste, etc.


Table 5 shows the no-sugar added beverage formula that used mainly Reb A, Reb D, GSG-S, or GSG-L. The amount of each ingredient (Reb A: 150 ppm; Reb D: 165 ppm; GSG-S: 190 ppm; and GSG-L: 300 ppm) was selected to have around 50 ppm of steviol in each formula.









TABLE 5







Mango-Passion Fruit Flavored Beverage (No Sugar Added)














Stevia








Ingredient
Reb A
Reb D
GSG-S
GSG-L
















Water
95.82
95.82
95.82
95.82



SG Content
0.015
0.0165
0.019
0.03



Citric Acid
0.078
0.078
0.078
0.078



Sodium Citrate
0.056
0.056
0.056
0.056



Mango flavor
0.031
0.031
0.031
0.031



Passion fruit
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.014



flavor










FIG. 3 shows the modification of flavor and sweetness profiles caused by glycosylation. The sweetness intensity decreased and sweet onset delayed with glycosylation. Mango flavor was enhanced and the passion fruit flavor was suppressed with glycosylation.


Example 5

Effect of the GSG Composition of the Blend on Taste Modification of Calorie Reduced Water Solution


To determine the contribution of different flavor blends on a sweetened, acidified water (with citric acid) formulation, samples were made with 9% sugar solution (pH 3.2) and GSG compositions as shown in Table 6 and compared against 10% sugar solution (pH 3.2).


Since sweetness intensity can impact the perception of the overall taste, flavor and sweetness profile, the main objective was to determine the contribution of different flavoring blends on different taste attributes by adding amount of each blend (Table 6) that contributes 1% sugar equivalent sweetness. The taste attributes of sweetness intensity, bitterness intensity and overall liking were used to rank flavors from most to least desirables.


The sensory evaluation was conducted by 20 members consumer panel recruited in Chicago area. Each person was trained on 15 point sweetness and bitterness intensity scale. For each sample, sweetness and bitterness intensity was evaluated on a 15 point scale. Sweet and bitter aftertaste was assessed on a 5 point scale. Overall liking was evaluated on a 9 point hedonic scale. Each participant tasted 5 samples during one session. Unsalted cracker and water were used to cleanse palate in addition to 2 minute wait between samples.


In forced ranking, the consumer panels found that GSG-S contributed the highest perception of sweetness, which decreased with larger molecules of GSG (GSG M & GSG-L) as shown in FIG. 4. The perception of bitterness was least for GSG-S, highest for GSG-M. The GSG-L and combination of GSG had lower bitterness than GSG-M. GSG-S was directionally better in delivering sweetness intensity without contributing significant bitterness. The statistical analysis of results indicates that the perception of lower bitterness had the highest impact on the overall liking of a sample. The sweet and bitter aftertaste had lower impact than bitter perception on the overall liking of a sample. FIG. 4 shows the relative perception of sweet and bitter taste.









TABLE 6







Formulations used for evaluating the impact of


different GSG blends on taste











Formulation: 9% acidified sugar solution +



Blends tested
flavoring ingredient














GSG-S
+63
ppm



GSG-M
+80
ppm



GSG-L
+120
ppm



GSG-RA
+82
ppm










Combination
+21 ppm GSG-S + 27 ppm GSG-



GSG-SRL
RA + 40 ppm GSG-L
















TABLE 7







Ranking of samples according to sweet and


bitter taste (highest 1, least 4)









Ranking by percentage (%) of panel members












Flavor Blends
1
2
3
4
Ranking High (1 + 2)















Sweet Ranking







GSG-S
50
25
20
5
75


GSG-M
25
25
25
25
50


GSG-L
10
30
15
45
40


GSG-SRL
15
20
40
25
35


Bitter Ranking







GSG-S
15
20
15
50
35


GSG-M
35
35
10
20
70


GSG-L
20
25
35
20
45


GSG-SRL
30
20
40
10
50









Example 6

Effect of the GSG and SG Composition of the Blend on Flavor Modification of Calorie Reduced Water Solution


To determine the contribution of flavor blends derived from different stevia extract and the distribution of residual SG, two GSG samples, GSG-M and GSG-RW were selected. Both these samples have similar GSG content, but they were made from different stevia extracts. GSG-M is made from a stevia extract with high Reb A content and it contains the predominantly Reb A as the residual SG in the blend. GSG-S is made from a stevia extract with high stevioside content and thus it contains the predominantly stevioside as the residual SG in the blend. To investigate the impact of the difference in residual SG content, two sets of acidified sweetened water (with citric acid) formulation, as outlined below, were prepared and tested by 25 consumer panel members.


Each participant was presented Set 1 first, followed by Set 2. The order of samples in each set was randomized and evaluated for sweetness, bitterness intensity and aftertaste and overall liking. Also, each panel member was asked for forced preference for liking in each set.


The Set-1 test samples sweetened with GSG-M and GSG-SW were judged directionally sweeter than 10% sugar solution (p=0.27 and p=0.15 respectively). The bitterness and aftertaste was similar to the control. No significant differences were seen in overall liking. In forced preference testing, the panel members preferred GSG-SW (48% ranked 1st) over control (28% ranked 1st) and GSG-M (24% ranked 1st).


The set-2 samples sweetened with Reb A and the GSG-M or GSG-SW scored directionally higher on sweetness intensity. The bitterness for GSG-SW was directionally lower than control (p=0.6). No significant differences were seen in aftertaste and overall liking.









TABLE 8







Samples tested with two GSG samples to determine the effect of


residual steviol glycosides blended with GSG








Set of Sample
Formulation used for sensory testing





Set 1
Acidified (citric acid) water solution of 10% sugar



(Control)



Acidified water solution with 9% sugar and GSG-M of



120 ppm



Acidified water solution with 9% sugar and GSG-SW



of 90 ppm


Set 2
Acidified water solution of Reb A @ 500 ppm



(Control)



Acidified water Solution of Reb A @ 500 ppm and



GSG-M of 120 ppm



Acidified water Solution of Reb A @ 500 ppm and



GSG-SW of 90 ppm









It is to be understood that the foregoing descriptions and specific embodiments shown herein are merely illustrative of the best mode of the invention and the principles thereof, and that modifications and additions may be easily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is understood to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A taste and flavor modifying composition comprising at least 80% total steviol glycosides on a weight basis, the total steviol glycosides comprising a sum of glycosylated and non-glycosylated steviol glycosides, wherein: a. the glycosylated steviol glycosides comprise short-chain glycosylated steviol glycosides having one to four α-1,4-glucosyl residues;b. the non-glycosylated steviol glycosides comprise residual steviol glycoside molecules having β-configured glucosyl residues; andc. maltodextrin.
  • 2. The taste and flavor modifying composition of claim 1, wherein the amount of glycosylated steviol glycosides range between 50% to 95% on a weight basis.
  • 3. The taste and flavor modifying composition of claim 1, wherein the residual steviol glycosides further comprise one or more selected from the group consisting of stevioside, rebaudioside A, and rebaudioside C.
  • 4. The taste and flavor modifying composition of claim 1, wherein the residual steviol glycosides content is less than 15% on a weight basis.
  • 5. The taste and flavor modifying composition of claim 1, wherein the maltodextrin content ranges between about 1% to 20% on a weight basis.
  • 6. A food or beverage product comprising the taste and flavor modifying composition of claim 1.
  • 7. The food or beverage product of claim 6, wherein the beverage comprises a carbonated soft drink.
  • 8. The food or beverage product of claim 6, wherein the taste and flavor profile are more intense than a comparative taste and flavor profile of a comparative food or beverage product which does not include the taste and flavor modifying composition.
  • 9. The food or beverage product of claim 6, wherein a mouthfeel of said food or beverage product is improved in relation to a mouthfeel of a comparative food or beverage product which does not include the taste and flavor modifying composition.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/553,975, filed on Aug. 28, 2019, which is a continuation of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/437,208, filed on Feb. 20, 2017, which is a divisional of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/742,457, filed on Jun. 17, 2015, which is a divisional of, and claims the benefit of priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/031,290, filed on Sep. 19, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein, which is a continuation-in-part application of, and claims the benefit of priority to, the following applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/005,852, filed on Sep. 18, 2013, which is a US National Stage Application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT Application number PCT/US2012/030210, filed on Mar. 22, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/005,850, filed on Sep. 18, 2013, which is a US National Stage Application under 37 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT Application number PCT/US2011/033912, filed on Apr. 26, 2011; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/567,707, filed on Aug. 6, 2012, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,647,844 on Feb. 11, 2014, and which is a divisional application of and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/029,263, filed on Feb. 17, 2011, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,257,948 on Sep. 4, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/589,754, filed on Aug. 20, 2012, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,735,101 on May 27, 2014, and which is a continuation application of and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/074,179, filed on Mar. 29, 2011, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,318,459 on Nov. 27, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/841,261, filed on Mar. 15, 2013; and U.S. Provisional Patent application No. 61/725,233, filed on Nov. 12, 2012.

US Referenced Citations (145)
Number Name Date Kind
2500173 Gisvold Mar 1950 A
2615015 Wilson Oct 1952 A
3723410 Persinos Mar 1973 A
4082858 Morita et al. Apr 1978 A
4112218 Inoue et al. Sep 1978 A
4171430 Ikushigetetsuo et al. Oct 1979 A
4219571 Miyake Aug 1980 A
4361697 Dobberstein et al. Nov 1982 A
4454290 Dubois Jun 1984 A
4590160 Nishihashi et al. May 1986 A
4599403 Kumar Jul 1986 A
4612942 Dobberstein et al. Sep 1986 A
4657638 Le Grand et al. Apr 1987 A
4892938 Giovanetto Jan 1990 A
4915969 Beyts Apr 1990 A
4917916 Hirao et al. Apr 1990 A
5112610 Kienle May 1992 A
5576042 Fuisz Nov 1996 A
5779805 Morano Jul 1998 A
5830523 Takaichi et al. Nov 1998 A
5962678 Payzant et al. Oct 1999 A
5972120 Kutowy et al. Oct 1999 A
6031157 Morita et al. Feb 2000 A
6080561 Morita et al. Jun 2000 A
6204377 Nishimoto et al. Mar 2001 B1
6228996 Zhou et al. May 2001 B1
6318157 Corso et al. Nov 2001 B1
6706304 Ishida et al. Mar 2004 B1
7807206 Magomet et al. Oct 2010 B2
7838044 Abelyan et al. Nov 2010 B2
7862845 Magomet et al. Jan 2011 B2
8030481 Prakash et al. Oct 2011 B2
8257948 Markosyan Sep 2012 B1
8318459 Markosyan Nov 2012 B2
8647844 Markosyan Feb 2014 B2
8669077 Markosyan Mar 2014 B2
8735101 Markosyan May 2014 B2
8911971 Markosyan Dec 2014 B2
8993269 Markosyan Mar 2015 B2
9055761 Markosyan Jun 2015 B2
9107436 Purkayastha et al. Aug 2015 B2
9585420 Purkayastha et al. Mar 2017 B2
20020132320 Wang et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020187232 Lee et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020197371 Lee et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030161876 Hansson et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030232118 Lerchenfeld et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236399 Zheng et al. Dec 2003 A1
20060083838 Jackson et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060134292 Abelyan et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142555 Jonnala et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070082102 Magomet et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070082103 Magomet et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070082106 Lee et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070116800 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116819 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116820 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116821 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116822 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116823 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116824 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116825 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116826 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116827 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116828 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116829 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116830 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116831 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116832 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116833 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116834 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116835 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116836 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116837 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116838 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116839 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116840 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070116841 Prakash et al. May 2007 A1
20070128311 Prakash et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070134390 Prakash et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070134391 Prakash et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070224321 Prakash et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070292582 Prakash et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080064063 Brandle et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080102497 Wong et al. May 2008 A1
20080107775 Prakash et al. May 2008 A1
20080107776 Prakash et al. May 2008 A1
20080107787 Prakash et al. May 2008 A1
20080108710 Prakash et al. May 2008 A1
20080111269 Politi et al. May 2008 A1
20080226770 Lee et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080226797 Lee et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080292764 Prakash et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080292765 Prakash et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080292775 Prakash et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080300402 Yang et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090017185 Catani Jan 2009 A1
20090053378 Prakash et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090074935 Lee Mar 2009 A1
20090079935 Harris et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090104330 Zasypkin Apr 2009 A1
20090142817 Norman et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090162499 McArdle et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090226590 Fouache et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090324793 Zheng et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100055752 Kumar Mar 2010 A1
20100056472 Duan et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100099857 Evans et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100057024 Cavallini May 2010 A1
20100112175 Abelyan et al. May 2010 A1
20100120710 Watanabe et al. May 2010 A1
20100137569 Prakash et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100018986 Abelyan et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100166679 Abelyan et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100189861 Abelyan et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100227034 Purkayastha et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100255171 Purkayastha et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100278993 Prakash et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100316782 Shi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110030457 Valery et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110033525 Liu Feb 2011 A1
20110092684 Abelyan et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110104353 Lee May 2011 A1
20110111115 Shi et al. May 2011 A1
20110124587 Jackson et al. May 2011 A1
20110163011 Prakash Jun 2011 A1
20110183056 Morita et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110189360 Yoo et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110195169 Markosyan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110224168 Szente Sep 2011 A1
20120157553 Dewis et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164678 Stephanopoulos et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120214751 Markosyan Aug 2012 A1
20120214752 Markosyan Aug 2012 A1
20120301589 Markosyan Nov 2012 A1
20130030060 Markosyan Jan 2013 A1
20130064955 Miguel et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130347140 Wang Dec 2013 A1
20140017378 Purkayastha et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140271996 Prakash et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140357588 Markosyan et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150031868 Lehmann et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150157045 Markosyan Jun 2015 A1
20170190728 Markosyan Jul 2017 A1
20180079767 Markosyan et al. Mar 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (118)
Number Date Country
1049666 Mar 1991 CN
1100727 Mar 1995 CN
1112565 Nov 1995 CN
1192447 Sep 1998 CN
1238341 May 2002 CN
1349997 May 2002 CN
101200480 Jun 2008 CN
101591365 Dec 2009 CN
101628924 Jan 2010 CN
0957178 Apr 1999 EP
2433505 Mar 2012 EP
2510800 Oct 2012 EP
2027423 Feb 1980 GB
52005800 Jan 1977 JP
52083731 Jul 1977 JP
52100500 Aug 1977 JP
52136200 Nov 1977 JP
54030199 Mar 1979 JP
54132599 Oct 1979 JP
55039731 Mar 1980 JP
55081567 Jun 1980 JP
55092400 Jul 1980 JP
55120770 Sep 1980 JP
55138372 Oct 1980 JP
55159770 Dec 1980 JP
55162953 Dec 1980 JP
56099768 Aug 1981 JP
56109568 Aug 1981 JP
56121453 Sep 1981 JP
56121454 Sep 1981 JP
56121455 Sep 1981 JP
56160962 Dec 1981 JP
57002656 Jan 1982 JP
57005663 Jan 1982 JP
57046998 Mar 1982 JP
57075992 May 1982 JP
57086264 May 1982 JP
58020170 Feb 1983 JP
58028246 Feb 1983 JP
58028247 Feb 1983 JP
S5878562 May 1983 JP
58212759 Dec 1983 JP
58212760 Dec 1983 JP
59045848 Mar 1984 JP
S5948059 Mar 1984 JP
59183670 Oct 1984 JP
66037950 Feb 1985 JP
60188035 Sep 1985 JP
62166861 Jul 1987 JP
63173531 Jul 1988 JP
1131191 May 1989 JP
H0383558 Apr 1991 JP
3262458 Nov 1991 JP
6007108 Jan 1994 JP
H4-322220 May 1994 JP
H4-322220 May 1994 JP
6192283 Jul 1994 JP
7143860 Jun 1995 JP
7177862 Jul 1995 JP
8000214 Jan 1996 JP
9107913 Apr 1997 JP
2000236842 Sep 2000 JP
2000270804 Oct 2000 JP
2002045145 Feb 2002 JP
2002262822 Sep 2002 JP
2010516764 May 2010 JP
20070067199 Jun 2007 KR
20080071605 Aug 2008 KR
10088869 Mar 2009 KR
20090021386 Mar 2009 KR
2111969 May 1998 RU
2123267 Dec 1998 RU
2156083 Sep 2000 RU
2167544 May 2001 RU
2198548 Feb 2003 RU
2002087359 Nov 2002 WO
2005089483 Sep 2005 WO
2006072878 Jul 2006 WO
2006072879 Jul 2006 WO
2007061795 May 2007 WO
2008091547 Jul 2008 WO
2008112966 Sep 2008 WO
2009071277 Jun 2009 WO
2009108680 Sep 2009 WO
2009140394 Nov 2009 WO
2010038911 Apr 2010 WO
2010118218 Oct 2010 WO
2010146463 Dec 2010 WO
2011046423 Apr 2011 WO
2011059954 May 2011 WO
2011183056 Jul 2011 WO
2011097359 Aug 2011 WO
2011112892 Sep 2011 WO
2011153378 Dec 2011 WO
2012006728 Jan 2012 WO
2012082493 Jun 2012 WO
2012082677 Jun 2012 WO
2012088593 Jul 2012 WO
WO-2012088593 Jul 2012 WO
2012102769 Aug 2012 WO
2012112180 Aug 2012 WO
2012125991 Sep 2012 WO
2012129451 Sep 2012 WO
2012166163 Dec 2012 WO
2012166164 Dec 2012 WO
2012177727 Dec 2012 WO
2013022989 Feb 2013 WO
2014122328 Feb 2013 WO
2013096420 Jun 2013 WO
2013110673 Aug 2013 WO
2013176738 Nov 2013 WO
2014122227 Aug 2014 WO
2014146089 Sep 2014 WO
2014146135 Sep 2014 WO
2014193888 Dec 2014 WO
2016023103 Feb 2016 WO
2016187559 Nov 2016 WO
2017160846 Sep 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (102)
Entry
Jaitak, et al., “An Efficient Microwave-assisted Extraction Process of Stevioside and Rebaudioside-A from Stevia Rebaudiana (Bertoni)”, Phytochem. Anal, vol. 20 2009, 240-245.
Kennelly, “Sweet and non-sweet constituents of Stevia rebaudiana”, Stevia: The genus Stevia, Taylor & Francis, 2002, 68-85.
Kinghorn, “Overview”, Stevia: The genus Stevia, Taylor & Francis, 2002, 1-17.
Kitahata, S. et al., “Production of Rubusoside Derivatives by Transgalactosylation of Various b-Galactosidases” Agric. Biol. Chem., vol. 53, No. 11 1989, 2923-2928.
Kobayashi, et al., “Dulcoside A and B, New diterpene glycosides from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 16 1977, 1405-1408.
Kochikyan , et al. ,“Combined Enzymatic Modification of Stevioside and Rebaudioside A”, Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, vol. 42, No. 1, 2006, 31-37.
Kohda, et al., “New sweet diterpene glucosides from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 15 1976, 981-983.
Kovylyaeva, et al., “Glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana”, Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 43, No. 1 2007, 81-85.
Li, Sha et al.; “Transglycosylation of stevioside to improve the edulcorant quality by lower substitution using cornstarch hydrolysate and CGTase”, Food Chemistry, vol. 138, No. 2, Nov. 12, 2012, pp. 2064-2069, XP028977479, ISSN: 0308-8146, DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2012.10.124.
Liu, et al., “Study of stevioside preparation by membrane separation process”, Desalination, vol. 83 1991, 375-382.
Lobov, S. V. et al., “Enzymic Production of Sweet Stevioside Derivatives: Transglucosylation of Glucosidases”, Agric. Biol. Chem., vol. 55, No. 12 1991, 2959-2965.
Markovic et al., “Chemical composition of leaf extracts of Stevia rebaudiana Bergoni grown experimentally in Vogvodina”, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 73 (3) 283-297 (2008).
Montovaneli, et al., “The effect of temperature and flow rate on the clarification of the aqueous Stevia-extract in fixed-bed column with zeolites”, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 21, No. 3 2004, 449-458.
Moraes, et al., “Clarification of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni extract adsorption in modified zeolites”, Acta Scientiarum, vol. 23, No. 6 2001, 1375-1380.
News Bites, GLG announces high purity REB M GRAS notification with FDA. Consumer Durables & Apparel Melbourne. Apr. 15, 2014. pp. 1-2. especially, p. 1, para 5; p. 2, para 1.
Ohio “14.0 Spray Drying and Spray Dryers”, pp. 1-10, http://elasslst.ohio-state-edu/DairyTech/14Spraydrying.htm Nov. 2, 2009 as obtained by internetarchive.org.
Ohta et al., “Characterization of Novel Steviol Glycosides from Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana Morita,” J. Appl. Glycosi., vol. 57, 199-209, 2010.
Ohtani et al. “Chapter 7. Methods to improve the taste of the sweet principles of Stevia rebaudiana.” The Genus Stevia, edited by A. Douglas Kinghom, CRC Press 2001, Taylor and Francis, London and New York, pp. 138-159.
Philips, K.C. “Stevia: steps in developing a new sweetener”, In T.H. Grenby, Editor, Developments in Sweeteners-3, Elsevier 1987, 1-43.
Pol, et al., “Characterisation of Stevia Rebaudiana by comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, 1150 (2007) 85-92.
Pol, et al., “Comparison of two different solvents employed for pressurised fluid extraction of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana: methanol versus water”, Anal Bioanal Chem vol. 388 2007, 1847-1857.
Prakash et al. “Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Rebaudioside M Isomer from a Bioconversion Reaction of Rebaudioside A and NMR Comparison Studies of Rebaudioside M Isolated from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and Stevia rebaudiana Morita,” Biomolecules, vol. 4, 2014, 374-389, p. 385 para 5.
Prakash et al., “Development of Next Generation Stevia Sweetener: Rebaudioside M” Foods 2014, 3, 162-175, ISSN 2304-8158.
Prakash et al., “Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener,” Jul. 1, 2008, Food and Chemical Toxology, vol. 46, Is. 7, Sup. 1, p. S75-S82.
Rajbhandari et al., “The Flavonoids of Stevia Rebaudiana”, Department of Pharmacognosy, Mar.-Apr. 1983, pp. 194-195.
Ramirez, I.; “Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats”, Physiology & Behaviour, 1994, 55(2), pp. 355-360 (Abstract only).
Rebaudioside A and Stevia Extract, Internet Citation, 2007 fittp://emperorsherbotogist.comirebaudioside_a:php. p. 1-3.
Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 21st Edition. The University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, 2006. Part 5, p. 700.
Richman et al., “Fuctional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides of Stevia rebaudiana,” The Plant Journal, vol. 41 (2005) 56-67.
Sakamoto et al., “Application of 13C NMR Spectroscopy to Chemistry of Natural Glycosides: Rebaudioside-C, a New Sweet Diterpene Glycoside of Stevia Rebaudiana”, Chem. Pharm. Bull., vol. 25, 1977, 844-846.
Shi, et al. “Synthesis of bifuntional polymeric adsorbent and its application in purification of Stevia glycosides”, Reactive & functional Polymers, vol. 50 2002, 107-116.
Shibata et al. “Glucosylation of Steviol and Steviol-Glucosides in Extracts from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni,” Plant Physiol. vol. 95, (1991) 152-156.
Starratt, et al. “Rebaudioside F, a diterpene glycoside from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 59 2002, 367-370.
R. Kasai, N. Kaneda, O. Tanaka, K. Yamasaki, I. Sakamoto, K. Morimoto, S. Okada, S. Kitahata, H. Furukawa, “Sweet Diterpene Glycoside of Stevia Leaves” Nippon Kagokukaishi (1981), (5), 726-735.
Sweet Green Fields, LLC “Notice to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that the use of Rebiana (Rebaudiosid A) derived from Stevia rebaudiana, as a Food Ingredient is Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS),” Jan. 15, 2009, http:/www.accessdata.fda.goviscripts/fcn/gras_notices/gm000282.pdf (obtained from the Web on May 8, 2012) entire document esp. p. 22, Table 1.
Tanaka, 0., “Improvement of taste of natural sweeteners,” Pure & Appl. Chem., vol. 69, No. 4 1997, 675-683.
Teo, et al. “Validation of green-solvent extraction combined with Chromatographic chemical fingerprint to evaluate quality of Stevia reaudiana Bertoni”, J. Sep. Sci, vol. 32 2009, 613-622.
Toyo sugar, “GRAS Exemption Claim for a-Glucosylated Steviol Glycosides” Office of Food Additive Safety. Feb. 23, 2011.
UN “Steviol Glycosides” JECFA 2008 pp. 1-4, UN “Steviol Glycosides” JECFA 2008 pp. 1-4 http://www.fao,org/agiaa,n/lecfa-additives/specs/monograph5/additive-442-m5.pdf.
United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization/Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (2010) Steviol Glycosides, Compendium of Food Additive Specifications, FAO JECFA Monographs 10, 17-21.
Van der Maarel et al., “Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the a-amylase family,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 94 (220) 137-155.
Vasquez et al., Stimulation of the Gerbil's Gustatory Receptors by Some Potently Sweet Terpenoids, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 41, 1305-1310, 1993.
Wallin, “Steviol glycosides,” 2004, XP002740430 ftp://11p.fao.orgfes/esnijeca/cta/CTA63 Steviol.pdf, pp. 1,4, 5. Retrieved 2015.
Yamamoto, K. et al., “Effective Production of Glycosyl-steviosides by a-1, 6 Transglucosylation of Dextrin Dextranase”, Biosci, Biotech, Biochem. vol. 58, No. 9 1994, 1657-1661.
Ye, et al. “Modification of stevioside using transglucosylation activity of Bacilllus amyloliquefaciens a-amylase to reduce its bitter aftertaste,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 51, Issue 1, May 2013, pp. 524-530.
Voda, et al. “Supercritical fluid extraction from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using CO2 and CO2+ water: extraction kinetics and identification of extracted components”, Journal of Food Entineerint, vol. 57 2003, 125-134.
Yoshikawa, et al. “Transglycosylation of Mogroside V, a Triterpene Glycoside in Siraitia grosvenori, by Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase and Improvement of the Qualities of Sweetness,” The Japanese Society of Applied Glycoscience, vol. 52, No. 3, 2005, 8.247-252.
Zell, et al. “Investigation of Polymorphism in Aspartame and Neotame Using Solid State NMR Spectroscopy”, Tetrahedron, vol. 56, 2000, 6603-6616.
Zhang et al. “Membrane-based separation scheme for processing sweetener from Stevia leaves”, Food Research International, vol. 33 2000, 617-620.
Database WPI, 0, Derwent World Patents Index, vol. 2001, No. 05, Database accession No. 2001-034294, XP002729277 & JP2000236842 A 20000905 (Nippon Seishi KK) [X] 1-10.
“Acetone”. Available online from Sigma-Aldrich as of Jan. 4, 2016. pp. 1-2.
“Methanol”. Available online from Sigma-Aldrich as of Jan. 4, 2016. pp. 1-2.
“Recrystallization Technique: Proper purification of crystalline solids”. Available online as of Dec. 4, 2009 from www.erowid.org. pp. 1-3.
“Toxicity, Alcohols”. Available online as of Jan. 29, 2010 from emedicine.medscape.com. pp. 1-4.
A-Glucosyltransferase Treated Stevia, Japan's Specifications and Standards for Food Additives, VIII edition, 2009, p. 257.
Ahmed, et al., “Use of p-Bromophenacyl Bromide to Enhance Ultraviolet Detection of Water-Soluble Organic Acids (Steviolbioside and Rebaudioside B) in High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis”, Journal of Chromatography, vol. 192, 1980, 387-393.
Bae S. et al.; “Manufacturing enzymatically modified Stevia for use in food and drink e.g. alcoholic beverage and for use as sweetening agent, flavor enhancer and reagent, involves adding cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase and Stevia extract in solvent”, WPI/THOMSON, vol. 2009, No. 60, Mar. 16, 2009, XP002729278.
Chang, S. S. et al., “Stability Studies of Stevioside and Rebaudioside A in Carbonated Beverages”, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 31, 1983, 409-412.
Chatsudthipong, et al. Stevioside and related compounds: Therapeutic benefits beyond sweetness, pp. 41-45 Pharmacology & Therapeutics 121 (2009).
Chaturvedula et al., “Structures of the novel diterpene glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana”, Carbohydrate Research 346 (2011) pp. 1057-1060.
Chaturvedula et al., “Two Minor Diterpene Glycosides from the Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana”, Natural Product Communications, 2011, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 175-178.
Chen, et al., “Enrichment and separation of rebaudioside A from stevia glycosides by a novel adsorbent with pyridyl group”, Science in China, vol. 42, No. 3 1999, 277-282.
Chen, et al., “Selectivity of polymer adsorbent in adsorptive separations of stevia diterpene glycisides”, Science in China, vol. 41, No. 4 1998, 436-441.
Chen, et al., “Studies on the adsorptive selectivity of the polar resin with carbonyl group on rebaudioside A”, Acta Polymeric Scnica, No. 4 1999, 398-403.
Crammer, et al., “Sweet glycosides from the Stevia plant”, Chemistry in Britain, Oct. 1986, 915-916, 918.
Darise et al., “Enzymic Transglucosylation of Rubusoside and the Structure-Sweetness Relationship of Steviol Bisglycosides,” Agric. Biol. Chern. Vol 48(10), 1984, 2483-2488.
Koyama, E. et al., “In vitro metabolism of the glycosidic sweeteners, stevia mixture and enzymatically modified stevia in human intestinal microflora” Food and Chemical Toxicology (2003), 41, 359-374.
Dubois et al., “Diterpenoid Sweeteners. Synthesis and Sensory Evaluation of Stevioside Analogues with improved Organoleptic Properties,” J. Med. Chem. vol. 28, (1985) 93-98.
FAO/WHO “Combined Compendium of Food Additive Specifications” FAO JECFA Monographs 1, vol. 4, 2006, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Fuh, “Purification of steviosides by membrane and ion exchange process”, Journal of Food Science, vol. 55, No. 5 1990, 1454-1457.
Fukunaga et al., “Enzymic Transglucosylation Products of Stevioside: Separation and Sweetness-evaluation,” Agric. Biol, Chem. vol. 53(6) (1989) 1603-1607.
Fullas et al., “Separation of natural product sweetening agents using overpressured layer chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography vol. 464 (1989) 213-219.
Gorden et al. (“Supersaturation” Access Science McGraw Hill 2008, p. 1, http://www.accessscience.com/content/supersaturation/670000).
Goyal et al., “Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) a bio-sweetener: a review”, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Feb. 2010; 61(1): pp. 1-10.
Hale, et al., “Amylase of Bacillus Macerans”, Cereal Chemistry, vol. 28, No. I, Jan. 1951, 49-58.
Harman et al. “Sensory Testing for Flavorings with Modifying Properties”, ift.org, No. 2013, vol. 67, No. 11, 15 pages.
Hartel, Richard “Crystallization in Foods” Handbook of Industrial Crystallization Elsevier 2002, pp. 287 and 293-296.
Huang, X Y, et al. “Preparative isolation and purification of steviol glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using high-speed counter-current chromatogoraphy” Separation and Purification Technology Elsevier Science, Netherlands, vol. 71, No. 2, 2010, p. 220-224.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2010/055960.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/028028.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033734.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033737.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033912.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/035173.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/036063.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/047498.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/047499.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/064343.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/024585.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/024722.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/030210.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/043294.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/051163.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052659.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052665.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/030439.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2014/041548.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2014056451.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2015/047234.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2018/053258.
Mizutani, K., et al., “Study on Improvement of Sweetness of Steviol Bisglycosides Selective Enzymic Transglucosylation of the 13-0-Glycosyl Moiety” Agric. Biol. Chem., (1989), 52(2), 395-398.
Kinghorn, A Douglas (ed), Stevia, Taylor & Francis (London & New York) 213pp. (2002).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200221744 A1 Jul 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61725233 Nov 2012 US
Divisions (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 14742457 Jun 2015 US
Child 15437208 US
Parent 14031290 Sep 2013 US
Child 14742457 US
Parent 13029263 Feb 2011 US
Child 13567707 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 16553975 Aug 2019 US
Child 16835103 US
Parent 15437208 Feb 2017 US
Child 16553975 US
Parent 13074179 Mar 2011 US
Child 13589754 US
Continuation in Parts (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 14005852 US
Child 14031290 US
Parent 14005850 Sep 2013 US
Child 14031290 Sep 2013 US
Parent PCT/US2011/033912 Apr 2011 US
Child 14005852 Sep 2013 US
Parent 13567707 Aug 2012 US
Child 14031290 Sep 2013 US
Parent 13589754 Aug 2012 US
Child 14031290 Sep 2013 US
Parent 13841261 Mar 2013 US
Child 14031290 Sep 2013 US