GLYCIDYL ESTERS OF ALPHA, ALPHA BRANCHED NEONONANOIC ACIDS, SYNTHESIS AND USES

Abstract
The invention relates to a manufacturing process for the preparation of α,α-branched alkane carboxylic acids providing glycidyl esters with an improved softness or hardness of the coatings derived thereof.
Description

The present invention relates to a manufacturing process for the preparation of α,α-branched alkane carboxylic acids providing glycidyl esters with an improved softness or hardness of the coatings derived thereof.


More in particular the invention relates to the preparation of aliphatic tertiary saturated carboxylic acids or α,α-branched alkane carboxylic acids, which contain 9 or 13 carbon atoms and which provide glycidyl esters with a branching level of the alkyl groups depending on the olefin feedstock used, and which is defined as below.


It is generally known from e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 2,831,877, U.S. Pat. No. 2,876,241, U.S. Pat. No. 3,053,869, U.S. Pat. No. 2,967,873 and U.S. Pat. No. 3,061,621 that mixtures of α,α-branched alkane carboxylic acids can be produced, starting from mono-olefins, carbon monoxide and water, in the presence of a strong acid.


From e.g. H van Hoorn and G C Vegter, Dynamic modulus measurements as a tool in the development of paint base materials FATIPEC, Euro Continental Congress 9, p. 51-60 (1968); Rheol. Acta 10, p. 208-212 (1971); H van Hoorn, the influence of side group structure on the glass transition temperature of isomeric vinyl ester polymers, the relation between the final coating film properties and the isomer distribution in starting branched carboxylic acids, was known.


In such mixtures of α,α-branched alkane carboxylic acids, significant proportions of blocking β-methyl-branched carboxylic acid isomers were found, the properties of which have been found to antagonize the attractive properties of other α,α-branched saturated carboxylic acid constituents of said mixtures, when applied in the form of vinyl esters in the coating industry, requiring more and more so-called softer acid derivatives.


More in particular the conventionally produced α,α-branched carboxylic acid mixtures had been found to cause a too high hardness of the final coating of films, which was disadvantageous and therefore undesired for certain applications, due to the presence of significant proportions of blocking β-alkyl-branched isomers.


One of the more recent remedies has been disclosed in EP 1033360A1. The problem of providing better softening derivatives of α,α-branched acids, manufactured from alkenes, carbon monoxide and water and an acid catalyst was solved therein by a process, which actually comprised:

    • (a) oligomerization of butene;
    • (b) separation of butene dimers and/or trimers from the oligomerisate;
    • (c) conversion of the butene dimers and/or trimers into carboxylic acids;
    • (d) conversion of the carboxylic acids into the corresponding vinyl esters showing attractive softening properties when mixed into other polymers or if used as comonomers in coatings.


An object of the above process are branched carboxylic acids, which are prepared from butene dimers obtainable by the OCTOL oligomerization process and containing not more than 35 wt % of multi-branched olefins, such as dimethylhexene, and preferably at most 25 wt %. Moreover said carboxylic acids, having a significantly increased content of 2,2-dimethyl heptanoic acid and 2-ethyl,2-methyl hexanoic acid, and a decreased content of 2,3-dimethyl-2-ethyl pentanoic acid, could provide the presently required attractive properties of the corresponding vinyl esters, such as a Tg of −3° C. at the lowest for the homopolymer of said C9 vinyl ester.


Another object of the disclosed process in EP 1 033 360 are branched C13 carboxylic acids, which are prepared from butene trimers obtainable by the OCTOL oligomerization process. Moreover said carboxylic acids, could provide the required attractive properties of the corresponding vinyl esters, such as a Tg of −13° C. at the lowest for the homopolymer of said C13 vinyl ester.


The entire prior art is interested to provide soft monomers to be used as vinyl ester in latex formulations for example and to act as plasticizer.


An object of the present invention is to provide α,α-branched alkane carboxylic acids glycidyl ester derivatives in order to obtain attractive properties of coatings derived therefrom.


As a result of extensive research and experimentation a process giving the branched carboxylic acids aimed at, it has surprisingly been found, that the branching level of the glycidyl ester has a strong influence on the coating properties.


Accordingly, the invention relates to a manufacturing process for the preparation of α,α-branched alkane carboxylic acids, by reacting a mono-olefin or a precursor thereof, with carbon monoxide in the presence of a catalyst and water characterized in that the starting olefin is ethylene or ethylene oligomers, or butene or butene derivatives or butene precursors (such as alcohol), the most preferred are butene or butene oligomers. The industrial sources for butene are Raffinate I or Raffinate II or Raffinate III.


Raf I or any other mixture of alkane-alkene with a isobutene content of at least 50% weight on total alkene, are fractions used to produce a highly branched acid derivatives after dimerisation or trimerisation, carboxylation and subsequently glycidation, the mixture of neo-acid (C9 or C13 acids) derivatives obtained by such a process and providing a mixture where the sum of the concentration of the blocked and of the highly branched isomers is at least 55%, preferably above 65%, most preferably above 75%.


If the olefin feed is based on Raf. II or Raf III or any mixture rich in n-butene isomers on the total olefins, the subsequently mixture of neo-acid (C9 or C13 acids) derivatives will provide a mixture where the concentration of blocked and highly branched isomers is maximum 55% preferably below 40% and most preferably below 30%.


We have discovered that well chosen blend of isomers of the glycidyl ester of, for example, neononanoic acids give different and unexpected performance in combination with some particular polymers such as polyester polyols. The isomers are described in Table 1 and illustrate in FIG. 1.


From the prior art it is known that polyester resins based on the commercially available Cardura E10 often result in coatings with a low hardness and a poor drying speed. This low drying speed results in work time lost when the coating is applied e.g. on cars and other vehicles. One alternative to this drawback was suggested in the literature by using the pivalic glycidyl ester (EP 0 996 657), however this low molecular derivative is volatile.


There is also a need for glycidyl esters giving a lower viscosity to the derived polyesters or ether resins and epoxy systems but that are free of any safety risks.


We have found that the performance of the glycidyl ester derived from the branched acid is depending on the branching level of the alkyl groups R1, R2 and R3, for example the neononanoic acid has 3, 4 or 5 methyl groups. Highly branched isomers are defined as isomers of neo-acids having at least 5 methyl groups.


Mixture of neononanoic acid providing a high hardness is a mixture where the sum of the concentration of the blocked and of the highly branched isomers is at least 50%, preferably above 60%, and most preferably above 75%.


Mixture of neononanoic acids providing soft polymers is a mixture where the concentration of blocked and highly branched isomers is maximum 55%, preferably below 40%, and most preferably below 30%.


The desired isomer distribution can be obtained by the selection of the correct starting olefin or precursors thereof, and also to a lesser extend by adjusting the Kock reaction conditions. The dimerisation or trimerisation of the olefin and/or the precussor thereof can be done for example according the method of EP1033360 and the subsequently carbonylation will provide the desired branched acid, which can be, for example glycidated according to PCT/EP2010/003334 or the U.S. Pat. No. 6,433,217.


The glycidyl esters so obtained can be used as reactive diluent for epoxy based formulations such as examplified in the technical brochure of Momentive (Product Bulletin: Cardura E10P The Unique Reactive Diluent MSC-521). Other uses of the glycidyl ester are the combinations with polyester polyols, or acrylic polyols, or polyether polyols. The combination with polyester polyols such as the one used in the car industry coating leads to a fast drying coating system with attractive coating properties.


The invention is further illustrated by the following examples, however without restricting its scope to these embodiments.


Methods Used

The isomer distribution of neo-acid can be determined by gas chromatography, using a flame ionization detector (FID). 0.5 ml sample is diluted in analytical grade dichloromethane and n-octanol may be used as internal standard. The conditions presented below result in the approximate retention times given in table 1. In that case n-Octanol has a retention time of approximately 8.21 minutes.


The GC method has the following settings:


Column: CP Wax 58 CB (FFAP), 50 m×0.25 mm, df=0.2 μm


Oven program: 150° C. (1.5 min)−3.5° C./min−250° C. (5 min)=35 min


Carrier gas: Helium

Flow: 2.0 mL/min constant


Split flow: 150 mL/min


Split ratio: 1:75


Injector temp: 250° C.


Detector temp: 325° C.


Injection volume: 1 μL


CP Wax 58 CB is a Gas chromatography column available from Agilent Technologies.


The isomers of neononanoic acid as illustrative example have the structure (R1R2R3)—C—COOH where the three R groups are linear or branched alkyl groups having together a total of 7 carbon atoms.


The structures and the retention time, using the above method, of all theoretical possible neononanoic isomers are drawn in FIG. 1 and listed in Table 1.


The isomers content is calculated from the relative peak area of the chromatogram obtained assuming that the response factors of all isomers are the same.









TABLE 1







Structure of all possible neononanoic isomers



















Retention






Methyl
Block-
time



R1
R2
R3
groups
ing
[Minutes]

















V901
Methyl
Methyl
n-pentyl
3
No
8.90


V902
Methyl
Methyl
2-pentyl
4
Yes
9.18


V903
Methyl
Methyl
2-methyl
4
No
8.6





butyl


V904
Methyl
Methyl
3-methyl
4
No
8.08





butyl


V905
Methyl
Methyl
1,1-dimethyl
5
Yes
10.21





propyl


V906
Methyl
Methyl
1,2-dimethy
5
Yes
9.57





propyl


V907
Methyl
Methyl
2,2-dimethyl
5
No
8.26





propyl


V908
Methyl
Methyl
3-pentyl
4
Yes
9.45


V909
Methyl
Ethyl
n-butyl
3
No
9.28


V910
Methyl
Ethyl
s-butyl
4
Yes
9.74


K1


V910
Methyl
Ethyl
s-butyl
4
Yes
9.84


K2


V911
Methyl
Ethyl
i-butyl
4
No
8.71


V912
Methyl
Ethyl
t-butyl
5
Yes
9.64


V913
Methyl
n-propyl
n-propyl
3
No
8.96


V914
Methyl
n-propyl
i-propyl
4
Yes
9.30


V915
Methyl
i-propyl
i-propyl
5
Yes
9.74


V916
Ethyl
Ethyl
n-propyl
3
No
9.44


V917
Ethyl
Ethyl
i-propyl
4
Yes
10.00



















FIG. 1: Structure of all possible neononanoic isomers




















embedded image


V901 = E





embedded image


V902 = F





embedded image


V903 = G





embedded image


V904 = H





embedded image


V905 = C





embedded image


V906 = D





embedded image


V907 = A





embedded image


V908 = I





embedded image


V909 = J





embedded image


V910** = K1





embedded image


V910** = K2





embedded image


V911 = L





embedded image


V912 = B2





embedded image


V913 = M





embedded image


V914 = P





embedded image


V915 = B1





embedded image


V916 = Q





embedded image


V917 = R










Blocking Isomers

Whereas the carbon atom in alpha position of the carboxylic acid is always a tertiary carbon atom, the carbon atom(s) in β position can either be primary, secondary or tertiary. Neononanoic acids (V9) with a secondary or a tertiary carbon atoms in the position are defined as blocking isomers (FIGS. 2 and 3).




embedded image


Methods for the Characterization of the Resins

The molecular weights of the resins are measured with gel permeation chromatography (Perkin Elmer/Water) in THF solution using polystyrene standards. Viscosity of the resins are measured with Brookfield viscometer (LVDV-I) at indicated temperature. Solids content are calculated with a function (Ww−Wd)/Ww×100%. Here Ww is the weight of a wet sample, Wd is the weight of the sample after dried in an oven at a temperature 110° C. for 1 hour.


Methods for the Characterization of the Clear Coats
Pot-Life

Pot-life is determined by observing the elapsed time for doubling of the initial viscosity at room temperature, usually 24.0±0.5° C. The initial viscosity of the clear coat is defined at 44-46 mPa·s for Part 1 and 93-108 mPa·s for Part 3 measured with Brookfield viscometer.


Application of Clearcoat

Q-panels are used as substrates. Then the panels are cleaned by a fast evaporating solvent methyl ethyl ketone or acetone. For Part 1 the clearcoat is spray-applied on Q-panels covered with basecoat; for Parts 2 & 3 the clearcoat is barcoated directly on Q-panels.


Dust Free Time

The dust free time (DFT) of clear coat is evaluated by vertically dropping a cotton wool ball on a flat substrate from a defined distance. When the cotton ball contacts with the substrate, the substrate is immediately turned over. The dust free time is defined as the time interval at which the cotton wool ball no longer adhered to the substrate.


Hardness Development

Hardness development is followed using pendulum hardness tester with Koenig method.


Chemicals Used:
Curing Agents

HDI: 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate trimer, Desmodur N3390 BA from Bayer Material Science or


Tolonate HDT LV2 from Perstorp


Leveling agent: ‘BYK 10 wt %’ which is BYK-331 diluted at 10% in butyl acetate


Catalyst: ‘DBTDL 1 wt %’ which is Dibutyl Tin Dilaurate diluted at 1 wt % in butyl acetate


Thinner: A: is a mixture of Xylene 50 wt %, Toluene 30 wt %, ShellsolA 10 wt %, 2-Ethoxyethylacetate 10 wt %.

    • B: is butyl acetate


      Monopentaerythritol: available from Sigma-Aldrich


      Methylhexahydrophtalic anhydride: available from Sigma-Aldrich


      acrylic acid: available from Sigma-Aldrich


      hydroxyethyl methacrylate: available from Sigma-Aldrich


      styrene: available from Sigma-Aldrich


      methyl methacrylate: available from Sigma-Aldrich


      butyl acrylate: available from Sigma-Aldrich


      tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate: available from Akzo Nobel


      Di-tert-butyl peroxide: Luperox Di from Arkema


      Cardura™ E10: available from Hexion Specialty Chemicals


      GE9S: glycidyl ester of C9 neo-acids obtained by dimerisation of n-butene, or Raf. II or Raf. III (leading to a mixture where the concentration of blocked and highly branched isomers is maximum 55% preferably below 40%) in presence of CO, a catalyst, water and subsequently reacted with epichlorohydrin


      GE9H: glycidyl ester of C9 neo-acids obtained by dimerisation of iso-butene, or Raf. I (leading to a mixture where the concentration of the blocked and of the highly branched isomers is at least 55%, preferably above 65%) in presence of CO, a catalyst, water and subsequently reacted with epichlorohydrin


      GE5: glycidyl ester of pivalic acid obtained by reaction of the acid with epichlorhydrin.







EXAMPLES
Example 1
Monopentaerythritol/Methylhexahydrophtalic Anhydride/GE9S (1/3/3 Molar Ratio)=CE-GE9S

80.4 g amount of butylacetate, 68.3 g of monopentaerythritol, 258.2 g of methylhexahydrophthalic anhydride are loaded in a glass reactor and heated to reflux until complete dissolution. Afterwards, the temperature is decreased down to 120° C. and 333.0 g of GE9S are added over about one hour. The cooking is pursued at 120° C. for the time needed to decrease epoxy group content and acid value down to an acid value below 15 mg KOH/g. Then, further 82.4 g of butylacetate are added. Test results are indicated in table 2.


Example 2a
Monopentaerythritol/Methylhexahydrophtalic Anhydride/GE9H (1/3/3 Molar Ratio)=CE-GE9H a

80.4 g amount of butylacetate, 68.3 g of monopentaerythritol, 258.2 g of methylhexahydrophthalic anhydride are loaded in a glass reactor and heated to reflux until complete dissolution. Afterwards, the temperature is decreased down to 120° C. and 337.1 g of GE9H are added over about one hour. The cooking is pursued at 120° C. for the time needed to decrease epoxy group content and acid value down to an acid value below 15 mg KOH/g. Then, further 83.4 g of butylacetate are added.


Example 2b
Monopentaerythritol/Methylhexahydrophtalic Anhydride/GE9H (1/3/3 Molar Ratio)=CE-GE9Hb

CE-GE9Hb is a duplication of Example 2a performed in very close experimental conditions.


Comparative Example 1a According to EP 0996657
Monopentaerythritol/Methylhexahydrophtalic Anhydride/GE5 (1/3/3 Molar Ratio) CE-GE5a

71.3 g amount of butylacetate, 60.5 g of monopentaerythritol, 228.90 g of methylhexahydrophthalic anhydride are loaded in a glass reactor and heated to reflux until complete dissolution. Afterwards, the temperature is decreased down to 120° C. and 214.3 g of GE5 are added over about one hour. The cooking is pursued at 120° C. for the time needed to decrease epoxy group content and acid value down to an acid value below 15 mg KOH/g. Then, further 52.1 g of butylacetate are added.


Comparative Example 1b According to EP 0996657
Monopentaerythritol/Methylhexahydrophtalic Anhydride/GE5 (1/3/3 Molar Ratio) CE-GE5b

CE-GE5b is a duplication of comparative example 1a performed in very close experimental conditions except for the higher amount of butylacetate added at the end of the reaction.









TABLE 2







Polyesters characterization














Mw

Mw/Mn



Polyester resin
SC (%)
(Da)
Mn (Da)
(PDI)
Viscosity (cP)















CE-GE9S
78.6
974
919
1.06
2450 (25.9° C.)


CE-GE9Ha
80.0
921
877
1.05
6220 (25.9° C.)


CE-GE9Hb
80.0
1014
975
1.04
11740 (21.6° C.) 


CE-GE5a
79.3
914
886
1.03
5080 (26.0° C.)


CE-GE5b
68.3
1177
1122
1.05
102.3 (22.0° C.) 





SC: solids content






Example 3
Acrylic Resin Synthesis
Cardura™ E10 Based Acrylic Polyol Resin: Acryl-CE(10)

105.0 g amount of CE10 (Cardura™ E10-glycidyl ester of Versatic acid) and 131.6 g of Shellsol A are loaded in a glass reactor and heated up to 157.5° C. Then, a mixture of monomers (37.4 g acrylic acid, 107.9 g hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 180.0 g styrene, 100.2 g butyl acrylate, 69.6 g methyl methacrylate) and initiator (12.0 g Di-tert-butyl peroxide) is fed into the reactor at a constant rate in 5 hours. Then post cooking started: a mixture of 6.0 g Di-tert-butyl peroxide and 18.0 g n-butyl acetate is fed into the reactor at a constant rate in 0.5 hour, then temperature maintained at about 157.5° C. for a further 0.5 hour. Finally, 183.2 g of n-butyl acetate is added under stirring to achieve a polyol resin with the target solids content. Test results are indicated in table 3.









TABLE 3







Acryl-CE(10) characterization














SC (%)-


Mw/Mn



Acryl-
measured
Mw (Da)
Mn (Da)
(PDI)







CE(10)
65.2
5094
2629
1.94










Three types of formulations have been prepared:

    • Blend Acryl-CE(10) blend with CE-GEx polyester with Desmodur as hardener (Part 1)
    • CE-GEx polyester alone with Tolonate HDT LV2 as hardener (0.03 wt % DBTDL)(Part 2)
    • CE-GEx polyester alone with Tolonate HDT LV2 as hardener (0.09 wt % DBTDL) (Part 3)


      Part 1: CE-GEx Polyesters Blend with Acryl-CE(10) Formulation









TABLE 4







Clear coats, formulations


(Part 1 - CE-GEx polyesters blend with Acryl-CE(10))

















BYK 10
DBTDL




Binder 1
Binder 2
HDI
wt %
1 wt %
Thinner A


CE-GEx
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)





GE9Hb
71.6
16.9
31.2
0.63
1.39
86.33


GE5b
79.1
12.4
31.2
0.63
1.39
89.30





Binder 1: Acryl-CE(10)


Binder 2: CE-GEx polyesters






Part 2—CE-GEx Polyesters Alone, No Acryl-CE(10) Formulation (0.03 Wt % DBTDL)









TABLE 5







Clear coats, formulations


(Part 2 - CE-GEx polyesters alone)
















DBTDL




Binder 2
HDI
BYK 10 wt %
1 wt %
Thinner B


CE-GEx
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)





GE9S
80.0
36.56
0.72
3.15
89.75


GE9H a
80.4
37.27
0.73
3.20
87.83


GE5 a
79.9
43.18
0.76
3.36
94.82









Part 3—CE-GEx Polyesters Alone, No Acryl-CE(10) Formulation (0.09 Wt % DBTDL)









TABLE 6







Clear coats, formulations


(Part 3 - CE-GEx polyesters alone)
















DBTDL




Binder 2
HDI
BYK 10 wt %
1 wt %
Thinner B


CE-GEx
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)





GE9H a
60.0
28.10
0.54
7.18
15.40


GE5 a
59.8
32.54
0.57
7.57
17.79









Characterization of the Clear Coats

The clearcoat formulations are barcoat applied on degreased Q-panel for Parts 2 & 3; sprayed for the Part 1 on Q-panel with a basecoat. The panels are dried at room temperature, optionally with a preliminary stoving at 60° C. for 30 min.


Part 1—CE-GEx Polyesters Blend with Acryl-CE(10)/Room Temperature Curing









TABLE 7







Clear coats, performances


(Part 1 - CE-GEx polyesters blend with Acryl-CE(10)
















Drying
DFT (min)



CE-GEx
Sc (%)
Potlife (h)
conditions
Cotton Balls







GE9Hb
47.1
4.5
RT
15



GE5b
46.2
4.0
RT
19







SC: solids content,



RT: room temperature







Part 2—CE-GEx Polyesters Alone, No Acryl-CE(10)/Room Temperature Curing and Room Temperature Drying after Stoving









TABLE 8







Clear coats, performances


(Part 2 - CE-GEx polyesters alone, no Acryl-CE(10)











Drying
DFT (min)
Koenig Hardness (s)













CE-GEx
SC (%)
conditions
Cotton Balls
6 h
24 h
7 d
















GE9S
48.4
RT
223
3
17
159


GE9H a
49.2
RT
 91
3
36
212


GE5 a
49.5
RT
114
1
29
216


GE9S
48.4
Stoving 30
Dust free
4
44
174




min/60° C.
out of oven


GE9H a
49.2
Stoving 30
Dust free
10
55
211




min/60° C.
out of oven


GE5 a
49.5
Stoving 30
Dust free
6
49
216




min/60° C.
out of oven










Part 3—CE-GEx Polyesters Alone, No Acryl-CE(10)/Room Temperature Curing and Room Temperature Drying after Stoving (0.09 Wt % DBTDL)









TABLE 9







Clear coats, performances


(Part 3- CE-GEx polyesters alone, no Acryl-CE(10))










DFT















Pot-

(min)



CE-
SC
life
Drying
Cotton
Koenig Hardness (s)














GEx
(%)
(min)
conditions
Balls
6 h
24 h
7 d

















GE9H a
69.8
42.4
RT
47
3
66
193


GE5 a
68.5
61.3
RT
73
3
55
191


GE9H a
69.8
42.4
Stoving 30
Dust free
29
102
210





min/60° C.
out of oven


GE5 a
68.5
61.3
Stoving 30
Dust free
12
69
205





min/60° C.
out of oven









Observations
Part 1

The potlife is about the same, the dust free time is shorter for GE9Hb vs. GE5b.


Part 2

The 24 h hardness order GE9H, GE5 and GE9S and the dust free time at room temperature is the best for GE9H.


Part 3

The hardness development is the best for GE9H at room temperature and heat cure, the dust free time at room temperature is quicker for GE9H than for GE5; and with a volatile organic content of 300 g/1.


Example 4
Polyether Resin

The following constituents were charged to a reaction vessel equipped with a stirrer, a thermometer and a condenser: 134 grams of di-Trimethylol propane (DTMP), 900 grams of glycidyl neononanoate, GE9 H, 135.5 grams of n-butylacetate (BAC) and 2.5 grams of Tin 2 Octoate. The mixture was heated to its reflux temperature of about 180° C. for about 4 hours till the glycidyl neononaoate was converted to an epoxy group content of less than 0.12 mg/g. After cooling down the polyether had a solids content of about 88%.


Example 5
Preparation for Vacuum Infusion of Composite Structures

A resin for vacuum infusion of large structures such as yacht and wind turbines was prepared by mixing 27.7 part by weight of curing agent blend and 100 part of epoxy resins blend described here:

    • Epoxy resins blend: 850 part by weight Epikote 828 and 150 part of glycidyl neononanoate, GE9 H.
    • Curing Agent blend: 650 part by weight of Jeffamine D230 and 350 part by weight of Isophorone diamine (IPDA).


Jeffamine D230 is a polyoxyalkyleneamines available from Huntsman Corporation. Epikote 828 is an epoxy resin available from Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc.


Example 6
Example of Trowellable Floor and Patching Compound

The ingredients presented in the table below were mixed for the preparation of a trowellable flooring compound





















Weight






(parts)
Volume (parts)
Supplier







BASE



COMPONENT



EPIKOTE
63.2
126.3
Momentive



828LVEL
11.1
22.3



GE9 H



Byk A530
4.8
13.4
Byk Chemie







Mix the additives into the EPIKOTE resin before filler addition












Total
79.1
162.0



FILLERS



Sand 1-2 mm
582.3
496.4
SCR Sibelco



Sand 0.2-0.6 mm
298.4
254.4
SCR Sibelco



Total
880.7
750.8







Disperse into the base component using a concrete mixer












CURING AGENT






COMPONENT



EPIKURE F205
40.2
87.2
Momentive



Total
40.2
87.2







Mix the curing agent well with the EPIKOTE resin base and


Fillers before application












Total formulation
1000.0
1000.0










Example 7
Formulation for a Water Based Self-Leveling Flooring

The ingredients presented in the table below were mixed for the preparation of a waterbased self leveling flooring system.


















Weight





(parts)
Supplier
Comment





CURING AGENT


COMPONENT (A)


EPIKURE 8545-W-52
164.00
Momentive


(HEW = 320 g/eq)


EPIKURE 3253
4.00
Momentive
Accelerator


BYK 045
5.00
BYK CHEMIE
defoamer


Antiterra 250
4.00
BYK CHEMIE
Dispersing


Byketol WS
5.00
BYK CHEMIE
Wetting agent


Bentone EW
20.00
Elementis
Anti-settling


(3% in water)







Mix the additive into the EPIKURE curing agents before filler addition










Titanium dioxide 2056
50.00
KronosTitan








Disperse the pigment for 10 minutes at 2000 rpm.










EWO-Heavy Spar
195.00
Sachtleben Chemie
Barium





sulphate


Quartz powder W8
98.00
Westdeutsche




Quarzwerke







Disperse fillers at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes










Water
55.00




Sand 0.1-0.4 mm
400.00
Euroquarz


Total component A
1000.00


RESIN COMPONENT


(B)


EPIKOTE 828LVEL
81.00
Momentive


GE9 H
19.00


Mix (B) into (A)



Total formulation A + B
1081.00



















Formulation characteristics



















Fillers + Pigment/Binder ratio
3.9
by weight



PVC
37.7
% v/v



Density
1.9
g/ml



Water content
12.5
% m/m










Example 8
The Adducts of Glycidyl Neononanoate, GE9 H or S and Acrylic Acid or Methacrylic Acid

The adducts of Glycidyl neononanoate GE9H with acrylic acid (ACE-adduct) and with methacrylic acid (MACE-adduct) are acrylic monomers that can be used to formulate hydroxyl functional (meth)acrylic polymers.


Compositions of the Adducts Intakes in Parts by Weight
















Acrylic acid
Meth acrylic acid



adduct
adduct




















Initial reactor charge





GE9H
250
250



Acrylic acid
80



Methacrylic acid

96.5



Radical Inhibitor



4-Methoxy phenol
0.463
0.463



Catalyst



DABCO T9 (0.07 wt % on
0.175
0.175



Glycidyl ester)












    • DABCO T9 and 4-Methoxy phenol (185 ppm calculated on glycidyl ester weight), are charged to the reactor.

    • The reaction is performed under air flow (in order to recycle the radical inhibitor).

    • The reactor charge is heated slowly under constant stirring to about 80° C., where an exothermic reaction starts, increasing the temperature to about 100° C.

    • The temperature of 100° C. is maintained, until an Epoxy Group Content below 30 meq/kg is reached. The reaction mixture is cooled to room temperature.





Example 9
Acrylic Resins for High Solids Automotive Refinish Clearcoats

A glass reactor equipped with stirrer was flushed with nitrogen, and the initial reactor charge heated to 160° C. The monomer mixture including the initiator was then gradually added to the reactor via a pump over 4 hours at this temperature. Additional initiator was then fed into the reactor during another period of 1 hour at 160° C. Finally the polymer is cooled down to 135° C. and diluted to a solids content of about 68% with xylene.
















Weight %
in Reactor 1 L (g)




















Initial Reactor Charge





GE 9H or GE9S
28.2
169.1



Xylene
2.7
16.2



Feeding materials



Acrylic acid
10
59.8



Hydroxy ethyl methacrylate
16.0
96.0



Styrene
30.0
180.0



Methyl methacrylate
15.8
95.0



Di t-Amyl peroxide
4.0
24.0



Xylene
8.3
49.8



Post cooking



Di t-Amyl peroxide
1.0
6.0



Xylene
3.0
18.0



Solvent adding at 130° C.



Xylene
50.8
305.0



Final solids content
61.8%



Hydroxyl content
4.12%










Example 10
Clear Coats for Automotive Refinish

Solvents were blended to yield a thinner mixture of the following composition:
















Thinner
Weight % in solvent blend, theory









Toluene
30.1%



ShellSolA
34.9%



2-ethoxyethyl acetate
10.0%



n-Butyl acetate
25.0%



Total
 100%










A clearcoat was then formulated with the following ingredients (parts by weight).
















Resin of






example
Desmodur
BYK 10 wt % in
DBTDL 1 wt % in



ex 9
N3390
ButAc
ButAc
Thinner







80.1
27.01
0.53
1.17
40.45
























Clearcoat properties
GE9H
GE9S









Volatile organic content
480 g/l
 481 g/l



Initial viscosity
 54 cP
  54 cP



Dust free time
 12 minutes
14.5 minutes



Koenig Hardness after 6 hours
 8.3 s
 7.1 s










Example 11
Acrylic Resins for First Finish Automotive Topcoats
GE9H Based (28%) Acrylic Polymers for Medium Solids First-Finish Clear Coats

A reactor for acrylic polyols is flushed with nitrogen and the initial reactor charge heated to 140° C. At this temperature the monomer mixture including the initiator is added over 4 hours to the reactor via a pump. Additional initiator is fed into the reactor during one hour, and then the mixture is kept at 140° C. to complete the conversion in a post reaction. Finally the polymer is cooled down and diluted with butyl acetate to a solids content of about 60%.


Paint Formulation

Clear lacquers are formulated from the acrylic polymers by addition of Cymel 1158 (curing agent from CYTEC), and solvent to dilute to spray viscosity. The acidity of the polymer is sufficient to catalyse the curing process, therefore no additional acid catalyst is added. The lacquer is stirred well to obtain a homogeneous composition.


Clear Lacquer Formulations and Properties of the Polymers















Intakes (part by weight)

















Ingredients



Acrylic polymer
60.0


Cymel 1158
8.8


Butyl acetate (to application viscosity)
24.1


Properties


Solids content [% m/m]
45.3


Initial reactor charge


GE 9H
164.40


Xylene
147.84


Monomer mixture


Acrylic acid
53.11


Butyl methacrylate
76.88


Butyl acrylate
48.82


Hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate
27.20


Styrene
177.41


Methyl methacrylate
47.31


Initiator


Di-tert.-amyl peroxide (DTAP)
8.87


Post addition


Di-tert.-amyl peroxide
5.91


Solvent (to dilute to 60% solids)


Butyl acetate
246.00


Total
1000.0


Density [g/ml]
0.97


VOC [g/l]
531









Application and Cure

The coatings are applied with a barcoater on Q-panels to achieve a dry film thickness of about 40 μm. The systems are flashed-off at room temperature for 15 minutes, then baked at 140° C. for 30 minutes. Tests on the cured systems are carried out after 1 day at 23° C.

Claims
  • 1. A process for synthesis of glycidyl ester from butene oligomers, comprising: (a) oligomerizing butenes or precursors of butene in presence of a catalyst, wherein the butenes or precursors of butane comprise a weight fraction of isobutene of at least 50 weight % on total alkene fraction of the mixture feed, or wherein the butenes or precursors of butane comprise a weight fraction of n-butene isomers of at least 50 weight % on total alkene fraction of the mixture feed,(b) converting butene oligomers to carboxylic acids which are longer by one carbon atom, and(c) converting the carboxylic acids to the corresponding glycidyl esters.
  • 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the butenes or precursors of butane comprise a weight fraction of isobutene of at least 50% and a mixture of neo-acid derivative obtained by the process comprises a mixture where the sum of the concentration of blocked and of highly branched isomers is at least 50%.
  • 3. The process of claim 1 wherein the butenes or precursors of butane comprise has a weight fraction of n-butene of at least 50% and a mixture of neo-acid derivatives comprise a mixture where the sum of the concentration of blocked and highly branched isomers is a maximum of 55%.
  • 4. A binder composition comprising the glycidyl esters obtained according to claim 1 reacted in resins selected from a group consisting of an hydroxyl functional polyester, or an hydroxyl functional polyether, or an hydroxyl functional acrylic resins or a mixture thereof.
  • 5. The use of the glycidyl esters of claim 1 in a blend with epoxy resins as reactive diluent.
  • 6. The use of the glycidyl esters of claim 1 in an reaction product with acrylic acid or methacrylic acid.
  • 7. The binder of claim 4 wherein the hydroxyl polyester comprises a calculated hydroxyl value above 100 mgKOH/g and an average molecular weight (MW) less than 5 000 DA.
  • 8. The binder of claim 4 wherein the hydroxyl polyester comprises a calculated hydroxyl value above 120 mgKOH/g and an average molecular weight (MW) less than 4 500 DA.
  • 9. The binder of claim 4 wherein the hydroxyl functional acrylic resins comprise a calculated hydroxyl value between 50 and 180 mgKOH/g and an average molecular weight (MW) between 2 500 and 50 000 DA.
  • 10. The binder of claim 7 wherein the mixture of neo-acid glycidyl derivative obtained by the process of claim 1 comprises an isomer composition wherein the sum of the concentration of blocked and of highly branched isomers is at least 50.
  • 11. The binder of claim 7 wherein the mixture of neo-acid glycidyl derivative obtained by the process of claim 1 comprises an isomer composition wherein the sum of the concentration of blocked and highly branched isomers is a maximum of 55.
  • 12. The binder of claim 8 wherein the mixture of neo-acid glycidyl derivative obtained by the process of claim 1 comprises an isomer composition wherein the sum of the concentration of the blocked and of the highly branched isomers is at least 50.
  • 13. The binder of claim 8 wherein the mixture of neo-acid glycidyl derivative obtained by the process of claim 1 comprises an isomer composition wherein the sum of the concentration of blocked and highly branched isomers is a maximum of 55.
  • 14. The binder of claim 9 wherein the mixture of neo-acid glycidyl derivative obtained by the process of claim 1 comprises an isomer composition wherein the sum of the concentration of the blocked and of the highly branched isomers is at least 50.
  • 15. The binder of claim 9 wherein the mixture of neo-acid glycidyl derivative obtained by the process of claim 1 comprises an isomer composition wherein the sum of the concentration of blocked and highly branched isomers is a maximum of 55.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
10013766.0 Oct 2010 EP regional
10015919.3 Dec 2010 EP regional
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of PCT Application PCT/EP2011/005105 with International Filing Date of Oct. 12, 2011, published as WO 2012/052126 A1, which further claims priority to European Patent Application No. 10015919.3 filed Dec. 22, 2010 and European Patent Application No. 10013766.0 filed Oct. 19, 2010, the entire contents of all are hereby incorporated by reference.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP2011/005105 10/12/2011 WO 00 4/4/2014