Golf ball compositions

Abstract

The present invention relates to improved cover compositions for golf ball construction. The cover compositions comprise a blend of polar modified thermoplastic elastomers and ionomer resins.In addition, the present invention is directed to golf balls produced utilizing the improved cover compositions. The golf balls exhibit properties of enhanced playability while substantially maintaining distance and/or durability characteristics.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to improved golf ball cover compositions suitable for golf ball construction. More particularly, the present invention relates to novel golf ball cover compositions comprised of a blend of ionomeric resins and thermoplastic rubber elastomers modified with various polar groups.

In addition, the present invention is directed to golf balls produced utilizing the improved cover compositions. The golf balls exhibit properties of enhanced playability while maintaining satisfactory distance and/or durability characteristics.

Background of the Invention

Ionomeric resins are polymers containing interchain ionic bonding. As a result of their toughness, durability, and flight characteristics, various ionomeric resins sold either by E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company under the trademark "Surlyn.RTM." or by Exxon Corporation under the trademarks "Escor.RTM." or "Iotek.RTM.", have become the materials of choice for the construction of golf ball covers over the traditional "balata" (trans polyisoprene, natural or synthetic) rubbers. The softer balata covers, although exhibiting enhanced playability properties, lack the durability necessary for repetitive play.

Ionomeric resins are generally ionic copolymers of an olefin such as ethylene and a metal salt of an unsaturated carboxylic acid, such as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, or maleic acid. Metal ions, such as sodium or zinc, are used to neutralize some portion of the acidic groups in the copolymer resulting in a thermoplastic elastomer exhibiting enhanced properties, i.e. durability, etc. for golf ball cover construction over balata. However, the advantages gained in increased durability have been offset to some degree by the decreases produced in playability.

Currently, more than fifty commercial grades of ionomers available from DuPont and Exxon with a wide range of properties which vary according to the type and amount of metal cations, molecular weight, composition of the base resin (i.e. relative content of ethylene and methacrylic acid groups) and additive ingredients such as reinforcements or additives. However, a great deal of research continues in order to develop golf ball cover compositions exhibiting not only the enhanced impact resistance and carrying distance properties produced by the "hard" ionomeric resins, but also the playability (i.e. "spin") characteristics previously associated with the "soft" balata covers, properties which are still desired by the more skilled golfer. Consequently, an object of the present invention is to provide golf ball cover compositions which, when utilized in golf ball construction, produce golf balls exhibiting improved playability properties while maintaining satisfactory resilience and durability.

As is indicated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,674,751, the patent literature is replete with proposed cover formulations seeking to improve upon the balata and ionomer covers which have been commercially successful, i.e. see U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,819,768; 3,359,231; 4,398,000; 4,234,184; 4,295,652; 4,248,432; 3,989,568; 3,310,102; 4,337,947; 4,123,061, and 3,490,246. However, none of these patents disclose and/or suggest the particular compositions of the present invention and the improved characteristics produced by golf balls formulated with such compositions.

The present invention is directed to new golf ball cover compositions which exhibit properties of enhanced playability (i.e. softness and spin) without producing substantial sacrifices in such properties as carrying distance (i.e. coefficient of restitution) and/or durability. It has been found that these properties can be produced by using ionomeric resins in combination with thermoplastic elastomers modified with various polar groups, such as maleic anhydride. Along this line, the present inventor discovered that contrary to the previous research in this area, the addition of newly developed polar modified thermoplastic elastomers to ionomeric resin compositions greatly improves the playability properties (i.e. decreases the hardness and increases the spin) of the compositions without adversely affecting the desired properties (i.e. cut resistance and/or resilience) produced by ionomeric resins.

Summary of the Invention

The present invention is directed to improved golf ball cover compositions and the resulting golf balls produced utilizing the cover compositions. The novel golf ball cover compositions of the invention comprise a blend of (1) thermoplastic elastomers modified with one or more polar groups, and (2) ionomeric resins. When the cover compositions of the invention are utilized to manufacture golf balls, the golf balls produced exhibit properties of improved playability without sacrificing distance and/or durability.

Two of the principal properties involved in the performance of golf balls are resilience and hardness. Resilience is determined by the coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.), the constant "e" which is the ratio of the relative velocity of two elastic spheres after direct impact to that before impact. As a result, the coefficient of restitution (i.e. "e") can vary from zero to one, with one being equivalent to an elastic collision and zero being equivalent to an inelastic collision.

Resilience (C.O.R.), along with additional factors such as clubhead speed, angle of trajectory, and ball configuration (i.e. dimple pattern), generally determines the distance a ball will travel when hit. Since clubhead speed and the angle of trajectory are not factors easily controllable, particularly by golf ball manufacturers, the factors of concern among manufacturers are the coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.) and the surface configuration of the ball.

The coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.) in solid core balls is a function of the composition of the molded core and of the cover. In balls containing a wound core (i.e. balls comprising a liquid or solid center, elastic windings, and a cover), the coefficient of restitution is a function of not only the composition of the center and cover, but also the composition and tension of the elastomeric windings. Although both the core and the cover contribute to the coefficient of restitution, the present invention is directed solely to the coefficient of restitution which is affected by the cover composition.

In this regard, the coefficient of restitution of a golf ball is generally measured by propelling a ball at a given speed against a hard surface and measuring the ball's incoming and outgoing velocity electronically. As mentioned above, the coefficient of restitution is the ratio of the outgoing velocity to incoming velocity. The coefficient of restitution must be carefully controlled in all commercial golf balls in order for the ball to be within the specifications regulated by the United States Golf Association (U.S.G.A.). Along this line, the U.S.G.A. standards indicate that a "regulation" ball cannot have an initial velocity (i.e. the speed off the club) exceeding 255 feet per second. Since the coefficient of restitution of a ball is related to the ball's initial velocity, it is highly desirable to produce a ball having a sufficiently high coefficient of restitution to closely approach the U.S.G.A. limit on initial velocity, while having an ample degree of softness (i.e. hardness) to produce enhanced playability (i.e. spin, etc.).

The hardness of the ball is the second principal property involved in the performance of a golf ball. The hardness of the ball can affect the playability of the ball on striking and the sound or "click" produced. Hardness is determined as the deformation (i.e. compression) of the ball under various load conditions applied across the ball's diameter (i.e. the lower the compression value, the harder the material). As indicated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,674,751, "softer" covers permit the accomplished golfer to impart proper spin. This is because the softer covers deform on impact significantly more than balls having "harder" ionomeric resin covers. As a result, this allows the better player to impart fade, draw, or backspin to the ball thereby enhancing playability. Such properties can be determined by various "spin rate tests", such as the "nine-iron" spin rate test set forth below.

Accordingly, the present invention is directed to new cover compositions which produce, upon molding around solid or wound cores, golf balls exhibiting a sufficient amount of hardness (i.e. softness) to improve the playability of the balls without adversely affecting the ball's distance (i.e. resilience) and/or durability (i.e. impact resistance, etc.).

These and other objects and features of the invention will be apparent from the following description and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to improved cover compositions for golf ball construction. The cover compositions comprise blends of modified thermoplastic elastomers, wherein the thermoplastic elastomers are modified with one or more polar groups, and ionomer resins.

The thermoplastic elastomers suitable for use in the present invention include modified copolymers of ethylene and propylene (i.e. ethylene-propylene rubbers (EPR)), styrenic copolymers (including styrenicblock copolymers and randomly distributed styrenic copolymers such as styrene-isobutylene copolymers), and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA). The ethylene-propylene rubbers modified with a polar group include those amine functionalized ethylene-propylene (EP-A) rubbers developed by Exxon Chemical Co. Styrenic block copolymers are manufactured in the U.S. by The Shell Chemical Co. and marketed under the tradenames of "Kraton D Rubber" (i.e. styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) and styrene-isoprene-styrene(SIS types)), and "Kraton G Rubber" (i.e. styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene(SEBS) and styrene-ethylene-propylene-styrene (SEPS)). The randomly distributed styrenic copolymers include the paramethylstyrene-isobutylene (isobutene) copolymers recently developed by the Exxon Chemical Co.

In this regard, it has been discovered that thermoplastic elastomers which have been modified with one or more polar groups, such as a newly developed maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic rubber sold by the ShellChemical Co. under the designation "Kraton FG 1901X", a maleic anhydride modified ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer sold by DuPont Canada Inc.under the trademark "Fusabond.RTM.", the styrene-isobutylene copolymers recently developed by the Exxon Chemical Co. under the designation "Bromo XP-50" and the amine modified ethylene-propylene rubbers available from Exxon under the mark "AE-P" are particularly well suited for use in golf ball cover construction. When the Kraton FG 1901X maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic rubber, the Fusabond.RTM. maleic anhydride modifiedEVA (such as Fusabond.RTM. D-197) and the styrene-isobutylene copolymers (such as Bromo XP-50) and the amine modified ethylene-propylene rubbers are blended with the specific ionomeric resins at the proportions set forth below and applied to a solid core to produce a molded golf ball, noticeable improvements in playability (i.e. spin properties, etc.) of theball are produced without producing substantial sacrifices in the ball's durability (i.e. impact resistance, etc.), and/or resilience (coefficient of restitution) characteristics. As indicated above, resilience which relates directly to the distance that a golf ball will travel when struck under controlled conditions.

This is a particularly interesting discovery in that when the present inventor had previously attempted to blend the softer unmodified thermoplastic elastomers with the harder ionomeric resins in order to improve the playability of the balls, the blends of the unmodified thermoplastic elastomers-ionomeric resins suffered from inadequate compatibility, and thus produced covers which exhibited very poor durability (i.e. inadequate impact resistance). It was only when the thermoplastic elastomers had been modified with a polar group, such as maleic anhydride, and blended with the relatively hard ionomeric resins, were improvements in both playability and durability exhibited. This is because it is believed that the polar or maleic anhydride group interacts (i.e. forms hydrogen bonds, etc.) with the acid groups of the ionomeric resins to produce a more compatible and homogenous mixture than the unmodified thermoplastic elastomers.

The maleic anhydride functionalized styrene block copolymers recently developed by the Shell Chemical Co. have been found to be particularly well suited for use in the present invention. Although these new copolymers have been used to generate super-tough blends with nylons, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and PBT, and are also useful for compatible blends of dissimilar polymers, it was unknown until the development of the present invention that the modified styrenic block copolymers could be blended with ionomer resins in order to produce compositions useful for golf ball cover construction. As a result, Kraton FG 1901X thermoplastic rubber, which is a maleic anhydride-functionalized triblock copolymer consisting of polystyrene end blocks and poly(ethylene/butylene) (i.e. styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene block copolymer (SEBS)) has been proven by the present inventor(s) to be an effective additive for ionomeric resin cover blends.

Shown in Table 1 below is a comparison of the mechanical properties of Kraton FG 1901X with "Kraton 1101", "Kraton G-2701", and "Kraton G-2706X",three unmodified styrene-diene thermoplastic block copolymers sold by the Shell Chemical Co.

TABLE 1______________________________________Typical Properties of Modified and UnmodifiedStyrene-Diene Block Copolymers Kraton Kraton Kraton Kraton(SEBS) FG 1901X 1101 (SBS) G-2701 (SEBS) G-2706X______________________________________Specific 0.91 0.94 0.90 0.90Gravity(g/cc)Polymeric 28 30 NA NAStyreneContent(% weight)Functional- 2 -- -- --ity (%weight asboundmaleicanhydride)Hardness, 75 71 67 28Shore ATensile 5,000 4,611 1,600 850Strength,psiElongation 500 880 260 950at Break,______________________________________

Furthermore, additional modified thermoplastic rubbers suitable for use in the present invention include other maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic rubbers currently under development by the Shell Chemical Co. under the "Kraton" designation. Examples of these additional modified thermoplastic rubbers include Kraton RP-6510 (containing about 0.5 weight % maleic anhydride (MA)), Kraton RP-52-14 (containing about 2.5 weight % maleic anhydride (MA)), Kraton RP-6505 (containing about 1.0% weight % maleic anhydride (MA)) and others listed below in Table 2. In this regard,Table 2 compares the variable differences of a large number of developmental maleic anhydride functionalized block copolymers to that of Kraton FG 1901X.

TABLE 2______________________________________Variable Differences in Developmental Maleic AnhydrideFunctionalized Block Copolymers Relativeto Kraton FG 1901XDevelopmental3BlockPolymer Block Mole Wt. Wt %Polymer % MA Styrene Rubber Styrene %______________________________________RP 52-14 2.5 NC NC NC NCRP 6505 1.0 NC NC NC NCRP 6510 0.5 NC NC NC NCRP 50-1 NC + + NC NCRP 50-3 + + + NC NCRP 50-6 - + + NC NCRP 6509 - - +VS - -RP 6511-1 -- ++ ++ ++ --RP 6511-2 - ++ ++ ++ --RP 6511-3 - ++ ++ ++ --______________________________________NC = No Change - = Decrease + = IncreaseVS = Very Slight

These additional modified thermoplastic rubbers, when used in the proportions and combinations set forth below to formulate golf ball cover compositions, produce golf balls exhibiting enhanced coefficient of restitution and durability without adversely affecting the playability of the balls.

Moreover, as briefly mentioned above, it has been discovered that when various maleic anhydride modified ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) thermoplastic elastomers, such as those sold by Dupont under the trademark "Fusabond.RTM.," are combined with the ionomer resins at the conditions set forth below, a golf ball cover composition exhibiting the improved results (i.e. enhance playability properties without a sacrifice in distance and/or durability) desired in the present invention are also produced. The properties, of the anhydride modified EVA compositions currently sold by DuPont, i.e. vinyl acetate (VA) percentage, melt index (MI) and weight percentage of maleic anhydride, are set forth below in Table 3.

TABLE 3______________________________________FUSABOND .RTM. C [CHEMICALLY MODIFIEDETHYLENE-VINYL ACETATE COPOLYMERS]Grade % VA MI Wt % MALEIC ANHYDRIDE______________________________________D-189 33 20 1%D-190 28 20 1%D-197 18 2.5 1%D-198 28 400 1%D-199 33 200 1%______________________________________

Furthermore, in addition to the above, it has been observed that the maleicanhydride modified thermoplastic elastomers suitable for use in the presentinvention may also be blended with unmodified thermoplastic elastomers and ionomeric resins to produce golf balls exhibiting an increase in the coefficient of restitution (i.e. rebound) while maintaining the balls's overall playability characteristics. Along this line, it is believed that the maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic elastomers act as a compatibilizer between the unmodified thermoplastic elastomers and the ionomeric resins. Since the unmodified thermoplastic elastomers are less costly than the modified thermoplastic elastomers, this observation offersmany commercial advantages.

Additional thermoplastic elastomers modified with a polar group that have been found to be effective in the present invention include the new styrene-isobutylene copolymers, particularly the new family of functionizable copolymers based on para-methylstyrene (PMS) and isobutylene (IB), recently developed by the Exxon Chemical Co. In this regard, the new brominated copolymers of paramethylstyrene and isobutylenesold by Exxon under the designation "Bromo XP-50" have proven to be effective, when blended with the ionomer resins, to produce cover compositions exhibiting enhanced playability (spin rates) and feel (softerin compression) properties while maintaining the durability characteristicsdesired.

The new functionalized paramethylstyrene-isobutylene copolymers are prepared by carbocationic copolymerization of isobutylene and paramethylstyrene at various ratios to produce a saturated copolymer backbone chain with randomly distributed pendant para-methyl substituted aromatic rings. Through a selective post-polymerization radical bromination process, a portion of the para-methyl groups are converted to bromomethyl groups to provide the desired amount of functionality. The functionalized polymers are in essence backbone-saturated terpolymers containing three types of randomly distributed units: isobutylene, para-methylstyrene and para-bromomethylstyrene. The benzyl bromide in the para-methyl group of these new saturated elastomers is the active functional group that permits crosslinking or vulcanization by a variety of mechanisms.

A number of the typical properties of the brominated copolymers of paramethylstyrene and isobutylene sold by Exxon are set forth below in Tables 4A-4D.

TABLE 4A__________________________________________________________________________Brominated Copolymers of Para-Methylstyreneand Isobutylene EMDX EMDX EMDX EMDX EMDX 89-1 89-4 90-2 90-3 90-10__________________________________________________________________________SpecificationMooney Viscosity.sup.1 35 .+-. 5 45 .+-. 5 35 .+-. 5 55 .+-. 5 45 .+-. 5ML (1 + 8) @ 125.degree. C.Antioxidant, wt % 0.10 .+-. 0.05 0.10 .+-. 0.05 0.10 .+-. 0.05 0.10 .+-. 0.05 0.10 .+-. 0.05Ash, wt % 0.5 max 0.5 max 0.5 max 0.5 max 0.5 maxWater, wt % 0.3 max 0.3 max 0.3 max 0.3 max 0.3 maxTypical InspectionComonomer (PMS), wt % 5 5 10 5 7.5Bromine, wt % 1.2 1.2 2 0.8 2Calcium, wt % 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07Cure Characteristics.sup.2,3ML, dN.m 14 18 14 20 18MH, dN.m 44 48 73 34 73ts2, min 7.5 7.5 6.5 7.5 6.5t'50, min 13 13 9 15 9t'90, min 20 20 16 21 16__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1 ASTM D1646, radial cavity dies .sup.2 Standard Recipe: Polymer100, IRB #6 Black 40, Stearic Acid 2, Zinc Oxide 0.5, Zinc Stearate 1.0 .sup.3 Cure Meter Testing based on ASTM D2804, (160.degree. C., 30 min, 3.degree. Arc, no preheat) TABLE 4B______________________________________Properties EMDX 89-4______________________________________Cure System, phrStearic Acid 0.5Zinc Oxide 2.0Sulfur 1.0NBTS 2.0Mooney Viscosity, ML (1 = +4) @ 100.degree. C. 54Scorch, 135.degree. C., min to 5 pt rise 30Rheometer - 160.degree. C., 3.degree. Arc, 30 min,1.67 Hz, 0 preheatML, dN.m 11.0MH, dN.m 26.4ts2, min 7.2t'90, min 14.4Monsanto Tel-Tac, 8 ox, 6 secSelf, kPa 162GPR, kPa 100Physical Properties Cured t'90 @ 160.degree. C.Hardness, Shore A 39300% Modulus, MPa 3.7Tensile Strength, MPa 9.8Elongation, % 600Fatigue-to-failure, cyc ave 8 samples 922Aged 7 days @ 180.degree. C.Hardness, Shore A 49300% Modulus, PMa 4.7Tensile Strength, MPa 5.9Elongation, % 410Fatigue-to-failure, cyc ave 8 samples 288______________________________________ TABLE 4C______________________________________ EMDX 90-10______________________________________Mooney Viscosity, ML (1 + 4) @ 100.degree. C. 43Scorch, 135.degree. C., min to 5 pt. rise 12.0Rheometer - 170.degree. C., 3.degree. Arc, 30 min,1.67 Hz, 0 preheatts2, min 2.6t'90, min 11.5Physical Properties Cured t'90 @ 170.degree. C.Tensile Strength, MPa 11.5300% Modulus, MPa 5.0Elongation, % 600Hardness, Shore A 52Tan Delta, t'90 + 5 min @ 170.degree. C., 60.degree. C./ 0.124100 Hz/.+-.5% strainDynamic Oxone, 100 pphm (20% ext), hrs to crack 300+Die B Tear, KN/m@ RT 38.8@ 100.degree. C. 29.6Adhesion to NR/BR/SBR Carcass @ 100.degree. C., 25.0(T)KN/mPico Abrasion, ASTM D-2228, 4.5 Kg Load/80 rev 107@ 1 HzFatigue Crack Growth Propagation (dc/dn)15% Strain, nm/cycle 14.730% Strain, nm/cycle 308______________________________________ TABLE 4D______________________________________Rheometer - 190.degree. C., 1.degree. Arc, 60 min, 1.67 Hz, 0 8reheatML, dN.m 15MH, dN.m 1.7ts2, min 1.7t'90, min 27.5Physical Properties Cured t'90 + 2 min @ 190.degree. C.Hardness, Shore A 63300% Modulus, MPa 4.6Tensile Strength, MPa 14.9Elongation, % 850300% Tension Set, % 9.4Aged 72 hrs in air @ 177.degree. C. 9.4Hardness, Shore A 84300% Modulus, MPa 5.6Tensile Strength, MPa 6.8Elongation, % 400300% Tension Set, % 34.4Aged 72 Hrs in steam @ 170.degree. C.Hardness, Shore A 64300% Modulus, MPa 6.6Tensile Strength, MPa 15.5Elongation, % 650300% Tension Set, % 9.4______________________________________

The ethylene-propylene rubbers (EPR) modified with a polar group suitable for use with the present invention include those amine group modified ethylene-propylene rubbers recently produced by the Exxon Chemical Co. According to Exxon, the amine modified ethylene-propylene rubbers have an ethylene content of about 40 to 60 weight percent, a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of approximately 100,000 to 200,000, a ratio of molecular weight to number average molecular weight (Mw) of about 2.1 and comprise of about 5 to 20 mmoles of amine per 100 grams of polymer. According to Exxon, the distribution of the reactive functional groups in the ethylene-propylene-amine polymer (i.e. EP-amine) is random along the chain.

More specifically, the amine group modified ethylene-propylene rubber from Exxon used in the examples has the following characteristics: ethylene content of 45 weight percent, 10 mmoles of amine per 100 grams of polymer,a Mw of 150,000, a Mooney Viscosity (at 125.degree. C.) of 20 and a melt flow index of 20 (at 230.degree. C.). Exxon indicates it is an amine modified version of VISTALON 457, an ethylene-propylene copolymer (EPM).

While Exxon indicates that the concentration of the functional groups can be varied by the specific polymerization and functionalization procedures utilized, generally the EP-amine materials have about 0.3 to 0.5 mol % offunctionality. For a polymer chain of the above average molecular weight this corresponds to approximately 6 to 10 functional groups per chain.

Moreover, it is believed that the inclusion of the polar amine groups in the amine modified ethylene-propylene rubbers produces a very strong interaction with the acid or ionomeric functionalities of the ionomer resins ultimately providing superior properties comparable to maleated ethylene-propylene or maleated Kraton, etc. and to hard/soft ionomer blends. See the Examples set forth in Table 15 below.

The ionomeric resins utilized to produce the cover compositions may be madeaccording to known procedures such as those in U.S. Pat. No. 3,421,766 or British Patent No. 963,380, with neutralization effected according to procedures disclosed in Canadian Patent Nos. 674,595 and 713,631, wherein the ionomer is produced by copolymerizing the olefin and carboxylic acid to produce a copolymer having the acid units randomly distributed along the polymer chain. The ionic copolymer comprises one or more .alpha.-olefins and from about 9 to about 20 weight percent of .alpha., .beta.-ethylenically unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acid, the basic copolymer neutralized with metal ions to the extent desired.

At least 20% of the carboxylic acid groups of the copolymer are neutralizedby the metal ions, such as sodium, potassium, zinc, calcium, magnesium, andthe like, and exist in the ionic state.

Suitable olefins for use in preparing the ionomeric resins include, but arenot limited to, ethylene, propylene, butene-1, hexene-1, and the like. Unsaturated carboxylic acids include, but are not limited to acrylic, methacrylic, ethacrylic, .alpha.-chloroacrylic, crotonic, maleic, fumaric,itaconic acids, and the like. Preferably, the ionomeric resin is a copolymer of ethylene with acrylic and/or methacrylic acid. In addition, two or more types of ionomeric resins may be blended into the cover compositions in order to produce the desired properties of the resulting golf balls.

Although the scope of the patent embraces all known ionomeric resins suitable for use in the present invention, only a relatively limited number of these ionomeric resins are commercially available. In this regard, the ionomeric resins sold by E. I. DuPont de Nemours Company underthe trademark "Surlyn.RTM.", and the ionomer resins sold by Exxon Corporation under the trademarks "Escor.RTM." or "Iotek.RTM." are examplesof commercially available ionomeric resins which may be utilized in the present invention in the combinations described in detail below. The ionomeric resins sold formerly under the designation "Escor.RTM." and now under the new name "Iotek", are very similar to those sold under the "Surlyn.RTM." trademark in that the "Iotek" ionomeric resins are availableas sodium or zinc salts of poly(ethylene acrylic acid) and the "Surlyn" resins are available as zinc or sodium salts of poly(ethylene methacrylic acid). In addition, various blends of "Iotek" and "Surlyn" ionomeric resins, as well as other available ionomeric resins, may be utilized in the present invention.

Examples of commercially available ionomeric resins which may be utilized in the present invention include the sodium ionic copolymer sold under thetrademark "Surlyn 8940" and the zinc ionic copolymer sold under the trademark "Surlyn 9910". Surlyn 8940 is a copolymer of ethylene with methacrylic acid with about 15 weight percent acid which is about 29% neutralized with sodium ions. This resin has an average melt flow index ofabout 2.8. Surlyn 9910 is a copolymer of ethylene and methacrylic acid withabout 15 weight percent acid which is about 58% neutralized with zinc ions.The average melt flow index of Surlyn 9910 is about 0.7. The typical properties of Surlyn 9910 and 8940, as well as additional ionomeric resinswhich may be utilized in the present invention, are set forth below in Table 5.

TABLE 5______________________________________Typical Properties of Commercially AvailableSurlyn Resins Suitable for Use in the Present InventionASTM D 9910 8940 AD-8265 AD-8269______________________________________Cation Sodium Zinc Sodium SodiumTypeMelt flow D-1238 2.8 0.7 0.9 0.9index, gms/10 min.Specific D-792 0.95 0.97 0.94 0.94Gravity,g/cm.sup.3Hardness, D-2240 --/66 --/64 92/39 84/25ShoreA/DTensile D-638 (4.8) 33.1 (3.6) 24.8 (4.2) 28.8 (3.1) 21.2Strength,(kpsi), MPaElongation, D-638 470 290 660 770Flexural D-790 (51) 350 (48) 330 (7.1) 49.1 (2.8) 19.3Modulus,(kpsi) MPaTensile D-18225 760 (360) 1010 494 (235) 447 (213)Impact (480)(23.degree. C.)KJ/m.sub.2 (ft.-lbs./in.sup.2)Melting DTA -- -- 81 72Point, .degree.C.Freezing DTA -- -- 51 38Point, .degree.C.Vicat D-1525 63 62 51 48Tempera-ture, .degree.C.______________________________________

In addition, examples of ionomer resins suitable for use in the present invention sold under the "Iotek.RTM." trademark by the Exxon Corporation include "Iotek 4000" (formerly "Escor 4000"), "Iotek 4010", "Iotek 8000" (formerly Escor 900), "Iotek 8020", and "Iotek 8030". The typical properties of the relatively "hard" Iotek ionomers are set forth below in Table 6.

TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Typical Properties of Iotek Ionomers ASTM Method Units 4000 4010 8000 8020 8030__________________________________________________________________________Resin PropertiesCation type zinc zinc sodium sodium sodiumMelt index D-1238 g/10 min. 2.5 1.5 0.8 1.6 2.8Density D-1505 kg/m.sup.3 963 963 954 960 960Melting Point D-3417 .degree.C. 90 90 90 87.5 87.5Crystallization Point D-3417 .degree.C. 62 64 56 53 55Vicat Softening Point D-1525 .degree.C. 62 63 61 64 67Plaque Properties (3 mmthick, compressionmolded)Tensile at break D-638 MPa 24 26 36 31.5 28Yield point D-638 MPa none none 21 21 23Elongation at break D-638 % 395 420 350 410 3951% Secant modulus D-638 MPa 160 160 300 350 390Shore Hardness D D-2240 -- 55 55 61 58 59Film Properties(50 micron film 2.2:1Blow-up ratio)Tensile at Break MD D-882 MPa 41 39 42 52 47.4 TD D-882 MPa 37 38 38 38 40.5Yield point MD D-882 MPa 15 17 17 23 21.6 TD D-882 MPa 14 15 15 21 20.7Elongation at Break MD D-882 % 310 270 260 295 305 TD D-882 % 360 340 280 340 3451% Secant modulus MD D-882 MPa 210 215 390 380 380 TD D-882 MPa 200 225 380 350 345Dart Drop impact D-1709 g/micron 12.4 12.5 20.3__________________________________________________________________________

Furthermore, in addition to the ionomeric resin indicated above, it has also found that if a new acrylic acid based experimental soft ionomer recently developed by the Exxon Corporation for the Spalding Sports Worldwide, a division of Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc., Tampa, Fla., is utilized with the relatively hard ionomers described above, in the combinations more clearly defined below and demonstrated in the Examples, not only are improvements in processability and clarity seen, but also theoverall combinations, when utilized for golf ball construction, produced golf balls having higher coefficient of restitution values (i.e. longer distance) at equal or softer hardness than golf balls produced by known hard-soft ionomer blends, including the hard-soft ionomer blends utilized to produce Spalding's current Tour Edition.RTM. ball.

In this regard, the inventor has found that when the new ethylene-acrylic acid based soft ionomer resins recently developed by the Exxon Corporationunder the designation "Iotek 7520" (referred experimentally by differences in neutralization and melt indexes as LDX 195, LDX 196, LDX 218 and LDX 219) are combined with the relatively hard ionomers indicated above, the combination produces higher C.O.R.s at equal or softer hardness, higher melt flow (which corresponds to improved, more efficient molding, i.e. fewer rejects), as well as significant cost savings versus balls produced by known hard-soft ionomer blends due to lower overall raw materials costsand improved yields.

While the exact chemical composition of the resins to be sold by Exxon under the designation Iotek 7520 is considered by Exxon to be confidentialand proprietary information, Exxon's Experimental Product Data sheet lists the following physical properties of the ethylene acrylic acid zinc ionomer developed by Exxon:

TABLE 7______________________________________Physical Properties of Iotek 7520 ASTM Method Units Typical Value______________________________________PropertyMelt Index D-1238 g/10 min. 2Density D-1505 kg/m.sup.3 0.962Cation ZincMelting Point D-3417 .degree.C. 66Crystallization D-3417 .degree.C. 49PointVicat Softening D-1525 .degree.C. 42PointPlaque Properties (2 mm thick Compression Molded Plaques)Tensile at Break D-638 MPa 10Yield Point D-638 Mpa NoneElongation at Break D-638 % 7601% Secant Modulus D-638 MPa 22Shore D Hardness D-2240 32Flexural Modulus D-790 MPa 26Zwick Rebond ISO 4862 % 52De Mattia Flex D-430 Cycles >5000Resistance______________________________________

In addition, test data collected indicates that Iotek 7520 resins have Shore D hardnesses of about 32-36 (per ASTM D-2240), melt flow indexes of 3.+-.0.5 g/10 min (at 190.degree. C. per ASTM D-1288), a flexural moduluses of about 2500-3500 psi (per ASTM D-790). Furthermore, testing byan independent testing laboratory by pyrolysis mass spectrometry indicates that the Iotek 7520 resins are generally zinc salts of a terpolymer of ethylene, acrylic acid, and methyl acrylate.

In view of the above information concerning the specific properties of the critical components of the core composition, it has been discovered that agolf ball can be generally produced in accordance with the present invention from a central core and an outer cover wherein the outer cover is made from a composition comprising a blend of about 5 to about 50 partsby weight of a thermoplastic elastomer modified with maleic anhydride and/or other polar modifying groups, and about 95 to about 50 of an ionomeric resin based on 100 parts by weight polymer in the composition.

More preferably, it has been found that a golf ball exhibited the properties of enhanced playability and durability without sacrificing traveling distance (i.e. C.O.R.) can be produced from a core and a cover wherein the cover is made from a composition comprised of about 15 to about 40 parts by weight of a thermoplastic elastomer modified with maleicanhydride and/or other polar modifying groups and about 85 to 60 parts by weight of an ionomeric resin based on 100 parts by weight polymer in the composition.

Most preferably, the golf ball of the present invention can be produced from a core and a cover wherein the cover is formed from a composition comprising 20 to 35 parts by weight of a thermoplastic elastomer modified with maleic anhydride and/or other polar modifying groups and about 80 to about 65 parts of an ionomeric resin based on 100 parts by weight polymer in the composition.

Additional materials may also be added to the compositions of the present invention, dyes (for example, Ultramarine Blue sold by Whitaker, Clark, and Daniels of South Plainsfield, N.J.), titanium dioxide, UV absorbers, antioxidants, and stabilizers. Moreover, the cover compositions of the present invention may also contain softening agents, such as plasticizers,etc., and reinforcing materials such as glass fibers and inorganic fillers,as long as the desired properties produced by the golf ball covers of the invention are not impaired.

The cover compositions of the present invention may be produced according to conventional melt blending procedures. Generally, the thermoplastic elastomers modified with the polar groups, such as maleic anhydride, are blended with the ionomeric resins in a Banbury type mixer, two-roll mill, or extruder prior to molding. The blended composition is then formed into slabs and maintained in such a state until molding is desired. If necessary, further additives such as an inorganic filler, antioxidants, stabilizers, and/or zinc oxide may be added and uniformly mixed before initiation of the molding process.

Moreover, golf balls of the present invention can be produced by molding processes currently well known in the golf ball art. Specifically, the golf balls can be produced by injection molding or compression molding thenovel cover compositions about wound or solid molded cores to produce a golf ball having a diameter of about 1.680 inches and weighing about 1.620ounces. The standards for both the diameter and weight of the balls are established by the United States Golf Association (U.S.G.A.). Although both solid core and wound cores can be utilized in the present invention, as a result their lower cost and superior performance, solid molded cores are preferred over wound cores.

Conventional solid cores are typically compression molded from a slug or uncured or slightly cured elastomer composition comprising a high cis content polybutadiene and a metal salt of an .alpha., .beta., ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid such as zinc mono or diacrylate or methacrylate. To achieve higher coefficients of restitution in the core, the manufacturer may include a small amount of a metal oxide such aszinc oxide. In addition, larger amounts of metal oxide than are needed to achieve the desired coefficient may be included in order to increase the core weight so that the finished ball more closely approaches the U.S.G.A.upper weight limit of 1.620 ounces. Other materials may be used in the corecomposition including compatible rubbers or ionomers, and low molecular weight fatty acids such as stearic acid. Free radical initiator catalysts such as peroxides are admixed with the core composition so that on the application of heat and pressure, a complex curing or cross-linking reaction takes place.

The term "solid cores" as used herein refers not only to one piece cores but also to those cores having a separate solid layer beneath the cover and above the core as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,431,193, and other multilayer and/or non-wound cores.

Wound cores are generally produced by winding a very large elastic thread around a solid or liquid filled balloon center. The elastic thread is wound around the center to produce a finished core of about 1.4 to 1.6 inches in diameter, generally. Since the core material is not an integral part of the present invention, a detailed discussion concerning the specific types of core materials which may be utilized with the cover compositions of the invention are not specifically set forth herein. In this regard, the cover compositions of the invention may be used in conjunction with any standard golf ball core.

As indicated, the golf balls of the present invention may be produced by forming covers consisting of the compositions of the invention around cores by conventional molding processes. For example, in compression molding, the cover composition is formed via injection at about 380.degree. F. to about 450.degree. F. into smooth surfaced hemispherical shells which are then positioned around the core in a dimpled golf ball mold and subjected to compression molding at 200.degree.-300.degree. F. for 2-10 minutes, followed by cooling at 50.degree.-70.degree. F. for 2-10minutes, to fuse the shells together to form an unitary ball. In addition, the golf balls may be produced by injection molding, wherein the cover composition is injected directly around the core placed in the center of agolf ball mold for a period of time at a mold temperature of from 50.degree. F. to about 100.degree. F. After molding the golf balls produced may undergo various further processing steps such as buffing, painting, and marking.

The resulting golf balls produced from the novel ionomeric resin-polar modified thermoplastic elastomers exhibit enhanced playability properties over the art without sacrificing distance and/or durability. This is because it is believed that the polar groups of the modified thermoplasticinteract with the acid and ionic groups of the ionomeric resins to produce compatible mixtures which, upon processing, are sufficiently soft to enhance playability but hard enough to maintain the coefficient of restitution necessary for distance and durability.

The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples in which the parts of the specific ingredients are by weight. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the examples, and various changes and modifications may be made in the invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.

EXAMPLES

By blending the ingredients set forth in the Tables below, a series of cover formulations were produced. In the examples, cover formulations containing thermoplastic elastomers modified with a polar group, such as maleic anhydride, and a number of different types of ionomeric resins werecompared with unmodified thermoplastic elastomer-ionomer resins. In addition, the properties produced by the cover compositions formulated with the unmodified and modified thermoplastic elastomer-ionomeric resin blends were compared to the properties produced by the cover materials representative of the Tour Edition (see Formulation 1) and the Top Flite.RTM. (see Formulation 2) balls currently being sold by Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc., Tampa, Fla. Although the specific formulations utilized to produce the Tour Edition and Top Flite.RTM. balls are proprietary, these formulations were utilized under the same processing conditions as those set forth below in order to produce covered golf ballsfor comparison purposes.

Along this line, the Tour Edition ball is unique in that it is a two piece solid core, molded cover ball that meets the needs of golfers who demand superior control, historically obtained only with balata covered wound balls. It offers superior playability at the sacrifice of coefficient of restitution, which relates directly to distance.

The Top Flite.RTM. ball is considered to be a "hard" Surlyn ionomeric resinball. As a result of the ball's hardness, the Top Flite.RTM. ball is a difficult ball for golfers to control. Generally, the harder the golf ball, the more difficult it is for a golfer to impart spin to the ball, and hence, control the ball during flight. However, as a result of its outstanding durability and maximum distance, the ball is widely accepted by a large percentage of golfers.

The present invention is directed to a blend of (1) a thermoplastic elastomers modified with a polar group, such as maleic anhydride, and (2) an ionomeric resin, which, when utilized for golf ball cover compositions,produces golf balls possessing the superior playability properties exhibited by the current Tour Edition ball without sacrificing the coefficient of restitution (i.e. distance) associated with the Top Flite.RTM. ball. In addition, the cover compositions of the present invention exhibit enhanced durability over unmodified thermoplastic elastomer-ionomeric resin compositions which possess some of the desired properties of the cover compositions of the present invention.

The cover formulations set forth below in Tables 8 and 9 were injection molded at 400.degree. F. around identical solid type cores having a finished diameter of 1.545 inches to produce golf balls approximately 1.680 inches in diameter having nominal cover thickness of 0.0675 inches. The properties of Riehle compression, coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.),Shore Hardness, impact resistance, and spin rate for the cover formulation were determined. In Tables 8 and 9, Formulations 5 and 10 are identical, and Formulations 6 and 11 are similar (i.e. different unmodified thermoplastic rubbers are utilized) in composition. These Examples have been set forth for comparison purposes under two separate testing conditions. The data for each example represents the average data for one dozen balls produced according to the desired manner. The properties were measured according to the following parameters:

Riehle compression is a measurement of the deformation of a golf ball in inches under a fixed static load of 225 pounds.

Coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.) was measured by firing the resulting golf ball is an air cannon at a velocity of 125 feet per second against a steel plate which is positioned 12 feet from the muzzle of the cannon. Therebound velocity was then measured. The rebound velocity was divided by theforward velocity to give the coefficient of restitution.

Shore hardness was measured in accordance with ASTM Test D-2240.

Cut resistance was measured in accordance with the following procedure: A golf ball is fired at 135 feet per second against the leading edge of a pitching wedge, wherein the leading edge radius is 1/32 inch, the loft angle is 51 degrees, the sole radius is 2.5 inches, and the bounce angle is 7 degrees.

The cut resistance of the balls tested herein was evaluated on a scale of 1-5. 5 represents a cut that extends completely through the cover to the core; a 4 represents a cut that does not extend completely through the cover but that does break the surface; a 3 does not break the surface of the cover but does leave a permanent dent; a 2 leaves only a slight creasewhich is permanent but not as severe as 3; and a 1 represents virtually no visible indentation or damage of any sort.

The spin rate of the golf ball was measured by striking the resulting golf balls with a 9 iron in the manner as described above wherein the club-headspeed is about 80 feet per second and the ball is launched at an angle of 26 to 34 degrees with an initial velocity of about 110-115 feet per second.

The spin rate was measured by observing the rotation of the ball in flight using stop action Strobe photography.

Initial velocity is the velocity of a golf ball when struck at a hammer speed of 143.8 feet per second in accordance with a test as prescribed by the U.S.G.A.

TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8__________________________________________________________________________IngredientsKraton FG-1901X -- -- 15 -- 30 -- 22.5 --Kraton G-2701 -- -- -- 15 -- 30 -- 22.5Surlyn 9910 18.8 18.8 15.1 15.1 17.0 17.0Surlyn 8940 56.6 56.6 45.3 45.3 50.8 50.8White MB 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6PropertiesMelt Index2160 g, 190 C.Weight, gms 45.5 45.5 45.4 45.5 45.4 45.5 45.5 45.5Riehle Compression 51 49 43 47 49 48 47 49C.O.R. .802 .816 .811 .807 .805 .804 .809 .806Shore A Hardness 90-91 98 94 95 91 91 92 92Cut Resistance 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 3 3 2-3 3-4(1 = Best, 5 = Worst)Spin PropertiesLaunch Angle 27.6 28.4Ball Speed 8626 8472Spin Rate (RPM)__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________ 1 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15__________________________________________________________________________IngredientsKraton FG-1901X -- 30 -- -- 30 -- --Kraton G-2706X -- -- 30 -- -- 30 --Kraton RP-6510 -- -- -- -- -- 30 -- -- 30Surlyn 9910 -- 15.1 15.1 15.1 -- -- --Surlyn 8940 -- 45.3 45.3 45.3 -- -- --Iotek 4000 45.2 -- -- -- 30.2 30.2 30.2Iotek 8000 -- -- 45.2 -- -- -- 30.2 30.2 30.2Surlyn White MB -- 9.6 9.6 9.6 -- -- --Iotek White MB 9.6 -- -- -- 9.6 9.6 9.6Melt Index 1.6 2.8 4.8 0.66 2.9 1.0 1.3 6.1 2.52160 g, 190 C.Weight, gms 45.7 45.6 45.7 45.3 45.5 45.3 45.4 45.3 45.4Riehle Compression 54 51 48 52 55 54 54 54 53C.O.R. .792 .804 .809 .797 .795 .800 .802 .800 .803Shore C Hardness 87-88 95-96 96 87-88 86-87 87 89-90 88-89 88-89Cut Resistance 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 4-5 2-3 2-3 4-5 2-3(1 = Best, 5 = Worst)Spin PropertiesLaunch Angle 30.0 31.8 32.6 29.7 29.8 30.2 30.4 30.7 30.4Ball Speed 113.2 112.7 112.8 114.6 114.1 113.8 113.6 113.7 113.8Spin Rate (RPM) 10117 8817 8066 10260 10218 10010 9706 9594 9679__________________________________________________________________________

Discussion of the Examples

As indicated above, although blends of unmodified thermoplastic rubbers with ionomeric resins generally produce softer covers which exhibit enhanced playability, these covers have very poor durability. This is evident in Formulations 6, 8, 11, and 14. In Formulations 6 and 8, Kraton G-2701 is blended with hard Surlyn grades 9910 and 8940 to produce relatively soft covers (i.e. Riehle Compressions of 48 and 49 and C.O.R.s of 0.804 and 0.806) in comparison to the hard Top Flite.RTM. cover composition set forth in Formulation 2 (i.e. the Top Flite.RTM. covers exhibit an average compression of 45 and an average C.O.R. of 0.816). The same can be seen in Formulations 11 and 14 except Kraton G-2706X was utilized as the unmodified thermoplastic rubber. In addition, in Formulations 14, Iotek 4000 and Iotek 8000 were substituted for the Surlynionomeric resins.

In this regard, significantly higher compressions, lower hardness values, and lower C.O.R.s indicate that the balls would have a softer feel and arethus, more readily deformed by a golf club. As a result of the additional deformation, a golfer can put more spin on the ball and, hence, impart better control over the ball.

However, while softer covers were produced by the unmodified thermoplastic rubber-ionomeric resin blends, the durability of the covers also drastically decreased. This can be seen in the cut resistance values of 4-5. The results are very similar to those produced by balata covered balls. Thus, while the playability of the covers produced from the unmodified thermoplastic rubber-ionomeric resin blends increased to some degree, the durability of the covers produced was insufficient for repetitive play.

Formulations 5 and 7 in Table 8 and Formulations 10, 12, 13, and 15 in Table 9 involve cover formulations produced according to the present invention. Specifically, these formulations involve covers produced from various polar modified (i.e. maleic anhydride modified) thermoplastic rubber-ionomer resin blends. Formulation 12 is similar to Formulation 10 except Kraton RP-6510 is used as the modified thermoplastic rubber elastomer as opposed to FG-1901-X. Formulations 13 and 15 are similar to Formulations 10 and 12 respectively, except that the Surlyn ionomeric resins were substituted with Iotek ionomeric resins. The pigment concentrates were also changed to enhance compatibility.

The examples of the present invention (i.e. Formulations 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, and 15) exhibit properties of enhanced playability demonstrated by the unmodified thermoplastic rubber-ionomeric resins without sacrificing distance and/or durability. This can be seen in that the Riehle compressions, Shore C hardness, and C.O.R.s of the covers of the formulations of the present invention are similar to the covers of the unmodified thermoplastic rubber-ionomeric resin formulations. For example,the values of the average Riehle compressions and C.O.R.s for Formulations 5 and 7 are 48 and 0.807, respectively, and for Formulations 6 and 8 the values are 48.5 and 0.805 respectfully. These values are very close to theintermediate values produced by the combination of the desired properties of the Tour Edition.RTM. ball (Formulation 1) and the Top Flite.RTM. ball (Formulation 2).

Furthermore, as demonstrated by the cut resistance results, the durability of the cover compositions of the present invention (i.e. 2-3 in Formulations 5 and 7) is greatly improved over the unmodified thermoplastic rubber-ionomeric resin blends of Formulations 6 and 8 (i.e. 4-5). The same results can be seen in the comparison of Formulations 10, 12, 13 and 15 which are directed to the polar modified thermoplastic rubber-ionomer resin blends of the present invention versus Formulations 11 and 14 concerning the unmodified thermoplastic rubber-ionomer resin formulations.

In addition, in order to demonstrate that other maleic anhydride functionalized thermoplastic rubber elastomers sold under the "Kraton" trademark are also effective in the present invention, the above Formulations were repeated with additional maleic anhydride modified Kraton rubbers. In this regard, Kraton RP-6510 contains about 0.5 weight percent maleic anhydride, Kraton RP-5214 contains about 2.5 weight percentmaleic anhydride, and RP-6505 1.0 weight percent maleic anhydride. The results listed in Table 10 below demonstrate that the additional maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic rubber elastomers when blended with ionomeric resins such as those sold under the Surlyn.RTM. designation offer higher coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.) than the current Tour Edition.RTM. ball. See Formulations 17-20.

In addition, the data set forth in Table 10, indicates that blends of maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic rubbers and unmodified thermoplastic rubbers produce increases in the coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.) over the current Tour Edition ball. As mentioned above, it is believed that the maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic elastomers act as a compatibilizer between the unmodified thermoplastic elastomers and the ionomer resins.

TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________ % MA 1 2 16 17 18 19 20 21__________________________________________________________________________Kraton FG-1901X 2.0 15.0 -- -- -- -- 15.0Kraton 2706X -- 15.0 -- -- -- -- --Kraton 1651 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15.0Kraton RP-6510 .5 -- 30.0 -- -- -- --Kraton RP-52-14 2.5 -- -- 30.0 -- -- --Kraton RP-6505 1.0 -- -- -- 30.0 -- --Kraton RP 6501 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30.0 --Surlyn 9910 -- 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1Surlyn 8940 -- 45.3 45.3 45.3 45.3 45.3 45.3White Masterbatch -- 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6Weight 45.6 45.4 45.6 45.3 45.4 45.4 45.3 45.7Compression 57 52 55 54 54 56 55 54C.O.R. .807 .820 .810 .813 .811 .810 .811 .808Shore C Hardness 83 87 82 84 85 83 85 84Cut Resistance 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3(1 = No mark5 = Clean cut)__________________________________________________________________________

As a result, the golf ball cover compositions of the present invention produces golf balls exhibiting properties of enhanced playability without sacrificing distance and/or durability.

Moreover, the process set forth in the above examples was also repeated forthe maleic anhydride (MA) modified EVA/ionomeric resin formulations set forth in Tables 11 and 12 below in order to demonstrate the effectivenessof these combinations for golf ball cover construction. Specifically in Table 11, the properties (C.O.R. and compression) of various blends of relatively hard ionomeric resins (i.e. Iotek 4000 and 8000) with maleic anhydride modified EVA (i.e. Fusabond D-189 (33% V.A., 20 M.I., and 1% maleic anhydride) or Fusabond D-197 (18% V.A., 2.5 M.I., and 1% maleic anhydride)) and/or unmodified EVA (i.e. Elvax.RTM. 460, (18% V.A., 2.5 M.I.) trademarked and sold by DuPont) were compared.

TABLE 11__________________________________________________________________________ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29__________________________________________________________________________Iotek 4000 50 42.5 42.5 35 35 35 42.5 35Iotek 8000 50 42.5 42.5 35 35 35 42.5 35Fusabond D-189 -- 15 -- 30 -- -- -- --Fusabond D-197 -- -- 15 -- 30 10 -- --ELVAX 460 -- -- -- -- -- 20 15 30C.O.R. .814 .796 .809 .796 .802 .801 .803 .800Compression 53 56 55 58 61 59 57 57__________________________________________________________________________

The results indicate that the ionomeric resins/maleic anhydride (MA) modified EVA blends (i.e. Formulations 24 and 26) provide higher C.O.R. values than the ionomeric resins/unmodified EVA blends (i.e. Formulations 28 and 29). In this comparison, since ionomeric resin blend and the weightpercent of vinyl acetate (i.e. 18%) and the melt index (i.e. 2.5) of the EVA compositions (i.e. Fusabond D-197 and Elvax 460) were exactly the same, the only differences was the inclusion of maleic anhydride modification to the EVA component of the composition. The data demonstrates that the incorporation of maleic anhydride (MA) modified EVA with the ionomeric resins produces a cover composition exhibiting enhancedC.O.R. values with little or no change in hardness over the unmodified EVA/ionomeric resin blends.

In Table 12 below, blends containing the incorporation of a maleic anhydride modified EVA (i.e. Fusabond D-197 in Formulations 33 and 34) with various ionomeric resins (specifically, relatively hard ionomeric resins Iotek 4000 and 8000) were compared with blends comprising of i) unmodified EVA/ionomeric resins (i.e. Formulation 38), ii) maleic anhydride modified and unmodified EVA/ionomeric resins (i.e. Formulation 37), iii) maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic rubber elastomer/ionomeric resins (i.e. Formulations 35 and 36), iv) relatively hard ionomeric resins (i.e. Formulations 30), and v) relatively hard and soft ionomeric resins.

TABLE 12__________________________________________________________________________ 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38__________________________________________________________________________Iotek 4000 45.2 37.7 30.2 37.7 30.2 40.2 35.2 30.2 30.2Iotek 8000 45.2 37.7 30.2 37.7 30.2 40.2 35.2 30.2 30.2Iotek 7520 -- 15 30 -- -- -- -- -- --Fusabond D-197 -- -- -- 15 30 -- -- 15 --Iotek White 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6Kraton FG 1901X -- -- -- -- -- 10 20 -- --ELVAX 460 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 20Weight 45.4 45.4 45.5 45.4 45.0 45.5 45.3 45.3 45.4Compression 50 53 54 53 55 52 54 54 54C.O.R. .801 .794 .790 .794 .788 .796 .793 .789 .788Shore D. Hardness 67 64 60 64 62 65 63 59 60Guillotine VG VG G VG G VG G G CC__________________________________________________________________________(VG = very goodG = goodF = fairCC = Cut to Core)

The data demonstrates that the inclusion of maleic anhydride modification is necessary in order to produce an EVA/ionomeric resin blend having the durability required for golf ball cover construction. In addition, the data indicates that the improved properties produced by the inclusion of the maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic rubber elastomers (i.e. KratonFG-1901X) to the ionomer resins are also produced by the inclusion of the maleic anhydride modified EVA to the resins. Further, the data also shows that the inclusion of the maleic anhydride modified EVA (i.e. Fusabond D-197) with the relatively hard ionomeric resins (i.e. Iotek 4000 and Iotek 8000) produces similar C.O.R. and hardness values as the inclusion of the much more costly soft ionomeric resin Iotek 7520.

As a result, the relatively low cost maleic anhydride modified EVA (i.e. Fusabond D-197 is approximately $1.30/lb.) can be used as a replacement for the relatively expensive soft ionomer (Iotek 7520 is approximately $2.00/lb.). Further cost savings can be achieved by using a blend of the maleic anhydride modified EVA and the unmodified EVA (Elvax 460 is approximately $0.70/lb) without much of a sacrifice in properties. However, as indicated above, as a result of the durability difficulty, theunmodified EVA can not be utilized alone with the ionomeric resins. Thus, although it has been known that use of ionomeric resin blends with unmodified EVA gives generally poor results, the improvements associated with the replacement of the unmodified EVA with maleic anhydride modified EVA are surprising and beneficial from both a performance and cost standpoint.

In addition, the process set forth in the above Examples was further repeated for the styrene-isobutylene copolymers/ionomeric resin formulations set forth in Tables 13 and 14 below in order to show the effectiveness of these combinations for golf ball cover production. In this regard, in Table 13, the characteristics (i.e. C.O.R., compression, hardness and spin rates) of "Bromo XP-50") (Exxon Chemical Co., specific grade designated "EMDX 90-2"), when blended with the hard ionomer resins Iotek 8000 and Iotek 7030 (i.e. Formulation 40), was compared with a blendfailing to contain a polar modified thermoplastic elastomer (i.e. Formulation 39), and blends containing Iotek 7520 (Formulation 41) and Kraton FG-1901X (Formulation 42), two materials previously established as being useful in such polar modified thermoplastic elastomer/ionomer resin blends. In Table 14, the amount of the brominated copolymer of paramethylstyrene and isobutylene was adjusted for the purposes of demonstrating the range of effectiveness of the styrene-isobutylene copolymers/ionomer blends.

TABLE 13______________________________________Ingredients 39 40 41 42______________________________________Iotek 8000 50 33 33 33Iotek 7030 50 33 33 33EMDX 90-2 -- 34 -- --Kraton -- -- 34 --FG-1901XIotek -- -- -- 34Weight 45.3 45.3 45.4 45.3Compression 53 56 61 58C.O.R. .811 .794 .781 .796Shore C 98 86 83 88HardnessSpin (RPM 6,415 8,942 9,989 8,854#9 Iron)Cut 4-5 4 3-4 4Resistance(1 = Clear Cut)(5 = Nomarking)______________________________________ TABLE 14__________________________________________________________________________Ingredients 43 44 45 46 47__________________________________________________________________________Iotek 8000 50 40 35 30 25Iotek 7030 50 40 35 30 25EMDX 90-2 -- 20 30 40 50Weight 45.3 45.4 45.3 45.4 45.3Compression 53 55 56 57 61C.O.R. .815 .799 .797 .790 .781Shore C Hardness 98 93 89 84 79Spin (RPM #9 Iron) 7,408 9,273 9,681 9,988 10,169Cut Resistance 4-5 4 4 3-4 3-4(1 = Clear Cut)(5 = No marking)__________________________________________________________________________

The results indicate that the styrene-isobutylene copolymers/ionomer resin blends produce enhanced playability characteristics (i.e. lower hardness, higher spin, etc.) over a wide range without adversely affecting the desired properties (i.e. durability etc.) produced by the ionomeric resins. Further, the data shows that the inclusion of the sytrene-isobutylene copolymers with the relatively hard ionomeric resins (i.e. Iotek 4000/7030 and Iotek 8000) produces similar C.O.R. and hardnessvalues as the maleic anhydride modified thermoplastic rubber elastomers andthe costly soft ionomer resin Iotek 7520.

Moreover, with respect to the enhanced properties produced due to the incorporation of ethylene-propylene rubbers (EPR) modified with various polar groups into the ionomer resin cover compositions, the process set forth in the Examples was again repeated. Specifically, cover compositionscomprised of blends of hard ionomer resins with an amine group modified ethylene-propylene rubber (i.e. AEP 2090) from Exxon were produced and evaluated in comparison with a number of different hard/soft ionomer blends. Table 15 shows the polar modified ethylene-propylene rubbers (i.e.the amine group modified ethylene-propylene rubbers) perform well as a replacement for the soft ionomer resins (i.e. Iotek 7520) in the cover compositions, producing higher C.O.R. values and at least equal cut resistance at significantly lower hardness. That is, using blends of the polar modified ethylene-propylene rubbers with the hard ionomer resins as the cover material of a golf ball, it is possible to produce a softer, faster ball than with soft/hard ionomer blends (see Examples 49-51 versus Examples 52-54).

TABLE 15__________________________________________________________________________Formulations 48 49 50 51 52 53 54__________________________________________________________________________IngredientsIotek 8000 50 40 30 20 40 30 20Iotek 7030 50 40 30 20 40 30 20AEP 2090 -- 20 40 60 -- -- --Iotek 7520 -- -- -- -- 20 40 60PropertiesWeight (g) 45.2 45.1 44.9 44.9 45.3 45.3 45.4Compression 49 53 57 60 53 57 60C.O.R. .810 .802 .793 .790 .802 .792 .776Shore C 98 91 84 65 94 87 75HardnessSpin 6,520 8,305 9,420 11,486 7,286 8,910 10,140(RPM #9 Iron)Cut Resistance 4-5 4 3-4 3 4 3-4 3(1 = clear cut)(5 = no marking)__________________________________________________________________________

The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to othersupon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such alterationsand modifications insofar as they come within the scope of the claims and the equivalents thereof.

Claims

1. A golf ball comprising a core and a cover wherein the cover is formed from a composition comprising from about 5 to about 50 parts by weight of an amine modified ethylene-propylene rubber and from about 95 to about 5 parts by weight of an ionic copolymer of an olefin and a metal salt of an unsaturated carboxylic acid based on 100 parts by weight of the composition.

2. A golf ball comprising a core and a cover wherein the cover is formed from a composition comprising from about 15 to about 40 parts by weight of an amine modified ethylene-propylene rubber and from about 85 to about 65 parts by weight of an ionic copolymer of an olefin and a metal salt of an unsaturated carboxylic acid based on 100 parts by weight of the composition.

3. A golf ball comprising a core and a cover wherein the cover is formed from a composition comprising from about 20 to about 35 parts by weight of an amine modified ethylene-propylene rubber and from about 80 to about 65 parts by weight of an ionic copolymer of an olefin and a metal salt of an unsaturated carboxylic acid based on 100 parts by weight of the composition.