Patent Grant
8956249
The present invention relates to a golf ball having a unique relationship between various aerodynamic properties. In particular, the golf ball of the present invention has a specific relationship between ball spin rate, moment of inertia, lift, and drag.
The spin rate of golf balls is the end result of many variables, one of which is the distribution of the density or specific gravity within the ball. Spin rate is an important characteristic of golf balls for both skilled and recreational golfers. High spin rate allows the more skilled players, such as PGA professionals and low handicapped players, to maximize control of the golf ball. A high spin rate golf ball is advantageous for an approach shot to the green. The ability to produce and control back spin to stop the ball on the green and side spin to draw or fade the ball substantially improves the player's control over the ball. Hence, the more skilled players generally prefer a golf ball that exhibits high spin rate.
On the other hand, recreational players who cannot intentionally control the spin of the ball generally do not prefer a high spin rate golf ball. For these players, slicing and hooking are the more immediate obstacles. When a club head strikes a ball, an unintentional side spin is often imparted to the ball, which sends the ball off its intended course. The side spin reduces the player's control over the ball, as well as the distance the ball will travel. A golf ball that spins less tends not to drift off-line erratically if the shot is not hit squarely off the club face. The low spin ball will not cure the hook or the slice, but will reduce the adverse effects of the side spin. Hence, recreational players prefer a golf ball that exhibits low spin rate.
Aerodynamic forces acting on a golf ball are typically resolved into orthogonal components of lift and drag. Lift is defined as the aerodynamic force component acting perpendicular to the flight path. It results from a difference in pressure that is created by a distortion in the air flow that results from the back spin of the ball. A boundary layer forms at the stagnation point of the ball, B, then grows and separates at points S1 and S2, as shown in
Drag is defined as the aerodynamic force component acting parallel to the ball flight direction. As the ball travels through the air, the air surrounding the ball has different velocities and, accordingly, different pressures. The air exerts maximum pressure at the stagnation point, B, on the front of the ball, as shown in
An average professional can generally drive a golf ball at a speed of approximately 235 feet per second (ft/s) or 160 miles per hour (mph). Most amateur golfers, however, have a “lower swing-speed,” i.e., slower club head speed at impact compared to a professional golfer, and are able to drive the ball at a speed of about 130 mph and a distance of less than about 200 to about 240 yards. When compared to a ball hit by a high swing-speed player, a similar ball that is hit by a low swing-speed player travels along a more ballistic trajectory than the trajectory typically achieved by tour caliber players.
For example, when a player strikes a ball, a portion of the energy from the club head is transferred to the ball as ball speed, and another portion of the energy is transferred to the ball as ball spin. Players with low swing-speed will have less energy available to transfer to both ball speed and ball spin. When club speed becomes very low, the resulting ball speed can be low enough that the effect of ball spin does not significantly increase lift (FL), which, in turn, generates a low ball speed (V) and low lift (FL). Thus, the advantages of a golf ball designed to have beneficial flight properties, such as high spin and high lift, are minimized when hit by a low swing-speed player.
Low weight golf balls have been made in an attempt to increase the lift to weight ratio of the golf ball, thereby increasing the effects of the lift on ball trajectory, and also to produce a greater initial velocity upon impact than a heavier ball. It is generally known that low weight golf balls slow down faster than normal weight golf balls due to drag, an effect that is magnified at higher speeds. As a result, these low weight balls have not been effectively designed to decrease the effect of drag. Several attempts have been made in the past to minimize drag, but these attempts have been focused only in combination with a player having a higher swing-speed.
The dimples on a golf ball are used to adjust drag and lift properties of a golf ball and, therefore, the majority of golf ball manufacturers research dimple patterns, shape, volume, and cross-section in order to improve overall flight distance of a golf ball. The dimples create a thin turbulent boundary layer around the ball. The turbulence energizes the boundary layer and aids in maintaining attachment to and around the ball to reduce the area of the wake. The pressure behind the ball is increased and the drag is substantially reduced.
A high degree of dimple coverage is beneficial to flight distance, but only if the dimples are of a reasonable size. Dimple coverage gained by filling spaces with tiny dimples is not very effective, since tiny dimples are not good turbulence generators. Most balls today still have many large spaces between dimples or have filled in these spaces with very small dimples that do not create enough turbulence at average golf ball velocities. Generally, as the lift of a dimple pattern increases, drag also increases. Conventional dimple designs tend to be aerodynamically optimized for higher swing speeds than low swing-speed players can achieve.
The construction of the golf ball may also play an important role in the optimization of the flight characteristics of a golf ball. Over the past decade, advances in core and cover chemistry and layer construction have led to golf balls with improved in-play characteristics, such as initial velocity, spin rate and feel. Golf balls are typically constructed of a single or multilayer core, solid or wound, that is tightly surrounded by a single or multilayer cover formed of polymeric materials, e.g., polyurethane, balata rubber, ionomers, or a combination thereof. Golf balls with a low modulus thermoset polyurethane cover, for example, have inherent high spin rates, high drag levels, and manufacturing difficulties.
While past research has been focused on either on the optimization of golf ball aerodynamic properties or golf ball construction to make slight improvements in flight characteristics, most advances have benefited high swing speed players. In addition, most long distance prior art golf balls possess low spin at high launch angles and low lift coefficients, while most short distance prior art golf balls possess high spin at low launch angles and high lift coefficients. Both types of golf balls typically have high drag coefficients.
There is minimal prior art disclosing preferred aerodynamic characteristics for golf balls. U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,023 discloses preferred lift and drag coefficients for a single speed with a functional dependence on spin ratio. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,213,898 and 6,290,615 disclose golf ball dimple patterns that reduce high-speed drag and increase low speed lift. It has now been discovered, contrary to the disclosures of these patents, that reduced high-speed drag and increased low speed lift does not necessarily result in improved flight performance. For example, excessive high-speed lift or excessive low-speed drag may result in undesirable flight performance characteristics. The prior art is largely silent, however, as to the combination of several aerodynamic features that influence other portions of golf ball flight, such as moment of inertia and flight consistency, as well as enhanced aerodynamic lift and drag coefficients for balls of varying size and weight.
A need thus exists for optimization of golf ball flight characteristics for all types of golfer swing speed, ability, or technique. In particular, a need exists in the art for a golf ball having a unique combination of lift and drag coefficients and spin rates.
The present invention is directed to a golf ball including a core and cover, wherein the golf ball comprises a moment of inertia of about 0.46 oz/in2 or greater, the lift coefficient is greater than about 0.20, the drag coefficient is less than about 0.22 at a Reynolds Number of about 145000. In one embodiment, the core has a compression of about 90 or less. In another embodiment, the core has a compression of about 70 or less.
The cover may have a hardness of about 60 Shore D or greater. In one embodiment, the cover has a hardness of about 65 Shore D or greater. In yet another embodiment, the cover includes an inner cover layer and an outer cover layer. In this aspect of the invention, the inner cover layer may have a first hardness and the outer cover layer has a second hardness less than the first hardness. For example, in one embodiment, the first hardness may be about 60 Shore D or greater and the second hardness may be less than about 60 Shore D. Conversely, the inner cover layer may have a first hardness and the outer cover layer has a second hardness greater than the first hardness. For instance, the first hardness may be less than about 60 Shore D or greater and the second hardness may be about 60 Shore D or greater.
The present invention is also directed to a golf ball including a core and cover, wherein the golf ball comprises a moment of inertia of about 0.40 oz/in2 or less, the lift coefficient is less than about 0.20, and the drag coefficient is less than about 0.22 at a Reynolds Number of about 145000. In one embodiment, the core has a compression of about 70 or greater. In another embodiment, the core has a compression of about 80 or greater. In yet another embodiment, the cover has a hardness of about 60 or less, preferably about 55 or less.
In this aspect of the invention, the cover may include an inner cover layer and an outer cover layer. In one embodiment, the inner cover layer has a first hardness and the outer cover layer has a second hardness greater than the first hardness. For example, the first hardness is less than about 60 Shore D or greater and the second hardness is about 60 Shore D or greater. In another embodiment, the inner cover layer has a first hardness and the outer cover layer has a second hardness less than the first hardness. For instance, the first hardness is about 60 Shore D or greater and the second hardness is less than about 60 Shore D.
These and other aspects of the present invention may be more fully understood with reference to, but not limited by, the following drawings.
The present invention is directed to golf balls having novel combinations of spin rates and lift and drag coefficients. In particular, the present invention is directed to a golf ball having a unique relationship between spin rate, lift and drag coefficients, and moment of inertia. The golf balls of the invention may be used with a variety of golfer swing speeds, abilities, and techniques.
Prior art golf balls at low spin rates and high launch angles typically have low lift coefficients and low drag coefficients coupled with a high moment of inertia. This combination of aerodynamic properties is beneficial for players desiring a long distance shot off the tee, but a player will have little control over the flight of the ball.
The first embodiment of the present invention is directed to a golf ball with low spin rates, high lift coefficients, and low drag coefficients, as illustrated in
In this aspect of the invention, a high lift and low drag is coupled with low to medium swing speed and low spin. For example, the lift coefficient (CL) is greater than about 0.20 and the drag coefficient (CD) is less than about 0.22 at a low to medium swing speed, e.g., Reynolds Numbers (NRe) of about 145000 and a low spin rate (ω) of about 3100 rpm.
Preferably, a golf ball according to this embodiment also possesses a high moment of inertia, which may aid in facilitating the design of a golf ball having less spin. For example, in one embodiment, a low spin rate golf ball preferably has a moment of inertia of about 0.46 oz/in2 or greater. In one embodiment, the moment of inertia is about 0.48 oz/in2 or greater. In yet another embodiment, the moment of inertia is about 0.49 oz/in2 or greater. Table 1 shows general aerodynamic characteristics for a low spin golf ball having high lift and low drag according to this embodiment of the invention.
Prior art golf balls having conventional dimple patterns at high spin rates and low launch angles typically have high lift coefficients and high drag coefficients coupled with a low moment of inertia. This combination of aerodynamic properties forces the golf ball to leave the club head vertically in a high head wind resulting in low distance, which may be useful for play in and around the green.
The second embodiment of the present invention is directed to lower the trajectory of a golf ball with a high spin rate in contrast to the above-referenced prior art golf balls. This may be accomplished by designing a golf ball with a high spin rate, a low lift coefficient, and a low drag coefficient, as illustrated in
Preferably, a golf ball according to this embodiment also possesses a low moment of inertia, which may aid in facilitating the design of a golf ball having these aerodynamic properties. For example, in one embodiment, a high spin rate golf ball preferably has a moment of inertia of about 0.4 oz/in2 or less. In another embodiment, the moment of inertia is about 0.38 oz/in2 or less. In yet another embodiment, the moment of inertia is about 0.36 oz/in2 or less. Table 2 shows general aerodynamic characteristics for a high spin golf ball having low lift and low drag according to this embodiment of the invention.
A golf ball according to either the first or second embodiment may be designed using a unique combination of aerodynamics and construction. A variety of combinations are contemplated by the present invention to achieve the specific relationship between spin rate, lift and drag coefficients, and moment of inertia, which will be discussed in more detail below. One of ordinary skill in the art, however, will appreciate that the examples given below are non-limiting and that there are additional combinations of aerodynamics and construction that will provide a golf ball as intended by the present invention without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
Aerodynamics
The aerodynamic force acting on a golf ball in flight is calculated by Equation 1 and illustrated in
F=FL+FD+FG (Eq. 1)
where F=force acting on the ball
FL=lift force
FD=drag force
FG=gravity
The lift force (FL) acts in a direction dictated by the cross product of the spin vector and the velocity vector. The drag force (FD) acts in a direction that is directly opposite the velocity vector. The lift and drag forces of Equation 1 are calculated in Equations 2 and 3, respectively:
FL=0.5CLρAV2 (Eq. 2)
FD=0.5CDρAV2 (Eq. 3)
where ρ=density of air (lb/ft3)
A=projected area of the ball (ft2)((π/4)*Dp2)
V=ball velocity (ft/s)
CL=dimensionless lift coefficient
CD=dimensionless drag coefficient
Lift and drag coefficients are used to quantify the force imparted to a ball in flight and are dependent on air density, air viscosity, ball speed, and spin rate. The coefficients may be obtained from Equations 2 and 3 as follow:
CL=2FL/ρAV2 (Eq. 4)
CD=2FD/ρAV2 (Eq. 5)
Lift and drag coefficients are used to quantify the force imparted to a ball in flight and are dependent on air density, air viscosity, ball speed, and spin rate; the influence of all these parameters may be captured by two dimensionless parameters Spin Ratio (SR) and Reynolds Number (NRe). Spin Ratio is the rotational surface speed of the ball divided by ball velocity. Reynolds Number quantifies the ratio of inertial to viscous forces acting on the golf ball moving through air. SR and NRe are calculated in Equations 4 and 5 below:
SR=ω(D/2)/V (Eq. 4)
NRe=DVρ/μ (Eq. 5)
where ω=ball rotation rate (radians/s) (2π(RPS))
RPS=ball rotation rate (revolution/s)
V=ball velocity (ft/s)
D=ball diameter (ft)
ρ=air density (slugs/ft3)
μ=absolute viscosity of air (lb/ft-s)
There are a number of suitable methods for determining the lift and drag coefficients for a given range of SR and NRe, which include the use of indoor test ranges with ballistic screen technology and is explained in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,729,976, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. U.S. Pat. No. 5,682,230, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, teach the use of a series of ballistic screens to acquire lift and drag coefficients. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,186,002 and 6,285,445, also incorporated in their entirety by reference herein, disclose methods for determining lift and drag coefficients for a given range of velocities and spin rates using an indoor test range, wherein the values for CL and CD are related to SR and NRe for each shot. One skilled in the art of golf ball aerodynamics testing could readily determine the lift and drag coefficients through the use of an indoor test range.
Moment of Inertia
The moment of inertia, as discussed above, also plays an important role in controlling the spin rate of a ball and, ultimately the aerodynamic properties as set forth by the present invention. One of ordinary skill in the art is aware of the methods in obtaining various levels of moment of inertia. A high moment of inertia, for example, may be accomplished by adding more weight to the perimeter of the golf ball, which, in turn, tends to slow the spin rate of a ball due to the higher resistance from the moment of inertia of the ball. Examples of methods of achieving a high moment of inertia are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,902,498 and 6,902,402, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein. In contrast, a low moment of inertia, may be found in a golf ball with more weight at the center of the golf ball, which allows for easier rotation of the ball and, thus, an accelerated spin rate as the ball leaves the club. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0059510, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, demonstrates methods of achieving low moments of inertia.
The radial distance, i.e., the centroid radius, from the center of the ball or from the outer cover, where the moment of inertia switches from being increased to being decreased as a result of the redistribution of weight or mass density, is an important factor in golf ball design. When more of the ball's mass or weight is reallocated to the volume of the ball between the center to the centroid radius, the moment of inertia is decreased, thereby producing a high spin ball. When more of the ball's mass or weight is reallocated to the volume between the centroid radius and the outer cover, the moment of inertia is increased, thereby producing a low spin ball. The centroid radius can be determined from Equation 6 and the steps outlined below:
Rcentroid=√0.6*r (Eq. 6)
Examples of various applications of Equations 6 and 7 and steps (a) through (h) are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,902,498, 6,908,402, and 6,494,795 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0059510.
Layer hardness and compression may also be adjusted to obtain the desired overall balance of properties. As such, a variety of different constructions may be used to achieve a golf ball according to the present invention. These constructions are discussed in greater detail below.
The specific gravity of the ball cores may be adjusted to obtain the desired moment of inertia. For example, low specific gravity centers, e.g., liquid and foam centers, typically result in high moments of inertia. In one embodiment, the ball may have more than one low specific gravity layers. For example, intermediate layers of the ball may have a specific gravity of less than about 0.9, and more preferably less than about 0.8.
The low specific gravity layer may be made from a number of suitable materials, as long as the layer is durable and does not impart undesirable characteristics to the ball. Suitable materials include, but are not limited to thermosetting syntactic foam with hollow sphere fillers or microspheres in a polymeric matrix of epoxy, urethane, polyester, or any suitable thermosetting binder, where the cured composition has a specific gravity of less than about 0.9. Suitable materials also include polyurethane foam or an integrally skinned polyurethane than forms a solid skin of polyurethane over a foamed substrate of the same composition. Other suitable materials include a nucleated reaction injection moldable (RIM) polyurethane or polyurea, where a gas, e.g., nitrogen, is essentially whipped into at least one component of the polyurethane, usually the prepolymer, prior to component injection into a closed mold where full reaction takes place resulting in a cured polymer having a reduced specific gravity. Moreover, a cast or RIM polyurethane or polyurea may have its specific gravity further reduced by the addition of fillers or hollow spheres. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,824,746 and 6,025,442 also describe a number of foamed or otherwise specific gravity reduced thermoplastic polymer compositions, e.g., metallocene-catalyzed polymers for use with the present invention, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,919,100, 6,152,834, and 6,149,535 disclose additional specific gravity reduced materials suitable for incorporation into the present invention golf ball. The disclosures of these patents are incorporated by reference herein. The low specific gravity layer(s) may also be manufactured by casting, spraying, dipping, injection molding, or compression molding.
Dimple Design
Dimple design may aid in the design of a golf ball according to the present invention. One way of designing a golf ball with specific aerodynamic properties, such as those outlined in Tables 1 and 2, is through different dimple patterns and geometry. As used herein, the term “dimple”, may include any texturizing on the surface of a golf ball, e.g., depressions and extrusions. Some non-limiting examples of depressions and extrusions include, but are not limited to, spherical depressions, meshes, raised ridges, and brambles. The depressions and extrusions may take a variety of planform shapes, such as circular, polygonal, oval, or irregular. Dimples that have multi-level configurations, i.e., dimple within a dimple, are also contemplated by the invention to obtain desirable aerodynamic characteristics.
Dimple patterns that provide a high percentage of surface coverage are preferred, and are well known in the art, preferably a dimple pattern that provides greater than about 70 percent surface coverage, and even more preferably greater than about 80 percent surface coverage. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,562,552, 5,575,477, 5,957,787, 5,249,804, and 4,925,193 disclose geometric patterns for positioning dimples on a golf ball. In one embodiment of the present invention, the dimple pattern is at least partially defined by phyllotaxis-based patterns, such as those described U.S. Pat. No. 6,338,684, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. A tubular lattice pattern, such as the one disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,290,615, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein, may also be used with golf balls of the present invention.
Several additional non-limiting examples of dimple patterns with varying sizes of dimples are also provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/404,164 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,213,898, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein. In one embodiment, the dimple pattern may include about five different sized dimples, as shown in
Parting Line
A parting line, or annular region, about the equator of a golf ball has been found to separate the flow profile of the air into two distinct halves while the golf ball is in flight and reduce the aerodynamic force associated with pressure recovery, thus improving flight distance and roll. The parting line must coincide with the axis of ball rotation. It is possible to manufacture a golf ball without parting line, however, most balls have one for ease of manufacturing, e.g., buffing of the golf balls after molding, and many players prefer to have a parting line for putting.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the golf balls include a dimple pattern containing at least one parting line, or annular region. In another embodiment, there is no parting line that does not intersect any dimples, as illustrated in the golf ball shown in
In yet another embodiment, the parting line(s) may include regions of no dimples or regions of shallow dimples, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,566,943, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. For example, most icosahedron patterns generally have modified triangles around the mid-section to create a parting line that does not intersect any dimples. Referring specifically to
In another embodiment, there are more than two parting lines that do not intersect any dimples. For example, the octahedral golf ball shown in
In yet another embodiment, the golf balls according to the present invention may have the dimples arranged so that there are less than four parting lines that do not intersect any dimples.
Dimple Count
In one embodiment, the golf balls according to the present invention have about 300 to about 500 total dimples. In another embodiment, the dimple patterns are icosahedron patterns with about 350 to about 450 total dimples. For example, the golf ball of
Dimple Diameter
In one embodiment, at least about 80 percent of the dimples have a diameter of about 0.11 inches or greater so that the majority of the dimples are sufficiently large to assist in creating a turbulent boundary layer. In another embodiment, at least about 90 percent of the dimples have a diameter of about 0.11 inches or greater. In yet another embodiment, at least about 95 percent of the dimples have a diameter of about 0.11 inches or greater. For example, all of the dimples have a diameter of about 0.11 inches or greater in the ball illustrated by
In another embodiment, shown in
Dimple Profile
The profile of the dimple may also aid in the design of a golf ball as outlined by the first embodiment of the invention. For example, golf balls having shallow depth dimples, such as those in U.S. Pat. No. 5,566,943, may be used with golf balls of the present invention to obtain high lift and low drag coefficients. Conversely, a relatively deep dimple depth may aid in obtaining a golf ball with low lift and low drag coefficients.
In addition, dimple patterns wherein all dimples have fixed radii and depth, but vary as to shape, may be useful with the present invention. For example, dimple shape variations may be defined as edge radius and edge angle or by catenary shape factor and edge radius. Dimples defined by the revolution of a catenary curve about an axis, such as the dimple profile disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,796,912 and 6,729,976, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated in by reference herein.
Constructions
The selection of materials is also an important factor in achieving a golf ball of the invention. The present invention generally relates to two piece golf balls having a core and a cover, or multilayer golf balls having a solid, liquid, gel, foam, or wound center. In multilayer balls, at least one intermediate layer is disposed concentrically adjacent to the center and a cover. Wound cores have generally been linked to higher spin rates than multilayer solid center balls.
The ratio of cover hardness to core hardness is a primary variable used to control the spin of a ball. In general, the harder the core, the greater the spin and the softer the cover, the greater the spin. For example, a golf ball formed with a soft core and a hard outer cover layer with a high Coefficient of Restitution in addition to the aerodynamics discussed above may aid in achieving a golf ball having a high lift coefficient, a low drag coefficient, low spin, and optionally with a high moment of inertia. In addition, a golf ball formed with a soft core and a soft cover with a high Coefficient of Restitution, e.g., greater than about 0.80, may be useful in obtaining a golf ball according to the second embodiment of the invention, i.e., a low lift coefficient, a low drag coefficient, high spin, and optionally with a low moment of inertia.
Centers
The centers of the golf balls of the present invention preferably have a Shore D hardness of about 65 or less. In another embodiment, the centers preferably have a hardness of about 55 or less. The cores of the invention preferably have reduced compression to help slow the spin rate. In a low spin embodiment, the compression is about 90 points or less. As used herein, the term “points” or “compression points” refer to the standard compression scale based on the ATTI Engineering Compression Tester. In one embodiment, the core compression is about 70 points or less. In contrast, the core compression is preferably about 70 points or more when the desired golf ball has high spin. In this aspect of the invention, the core compression is about 80 points or more.
Conventional materials useful in centers, cores, or core layers of the golf balls of the invention include, but are not limited to, compositions having a base rubber, a cis-to-trans catalyst, a crosslinking agent, a free radical source, and a filler. The base rubber typically includes natural or synthetic rubbers. A preferred base rubber is 1,4-polybutadiene having a cis-structure of at least 40 percent. Natural rubber, polyisoprene rubber and/or styrene-butadiene rubber may be optionally added to the 1,4-polybutadiene. Golf balls of the invention may also have conventional wound cores, where the core comprises a fluid, solid or hollow center wrapped in elastomeric windings.
The free-radical source is typically a peroxide, and preferably an organic peroxide. Suitable free-radical sources include di-t-amyl peroxide, di(2-t-butyl-peroxyisopropyl)benzene peroxide, 1,1-bis(t-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane, dicumyl peroxide, di-t-butyl peroxide, 2,5-di-(t-butylperoxy)-2,5-dimethyl hexane, n-butyl-4,4-bis(t-butylperoxy)valerate, lauryl peroxide, benzoyl peroxide, t-butyl hydroperoxide, and the like, and any mixture thereof.
Suitable crosslinking agents include one or more metallic salts of unsaturated α,β-fatty acids or monocarboxylic acids, such as zinc, calcium, or magnesium acrylate salts, and the like, and mixtures thereof. Preferred acrylates include zinc acrylate, zinc diacrylate, zinc methacrylate, and zinc dimethacrylate, and mixtures thereof. The crosslinking agent must be present in an amount sufficient to crosslink a portion of the chains of polymers in the resilient polymer component. For example, the desired compression may be obtained by altering the type and amount of crosslinking agent. Crosslinkers may be included in other layers of the ball to increase the hardness of reaction products used.
Fillers may be used to modify the distribution of ball weight to or from the perimeter or center of the ball. Fillers typically include processing aids or compounds to affect rheological and mixing properties, the specific gravity (i.e., density-modifying fillers), the modulus, the tear strength, reinforcement, and the like. The fillers are generally inorganic, and suitable fillers include numerous metals or metal oxides, such as zinc oxide and tin oxide, as well as barium sulfate, zinc sulfate, calcium carbonate, barium carbonate, clay, tungsten, tungsten carbide, an array of silicas, ground particles of cured rubber, and mixtures thereof. Fillers may also include various foaming agents or blowing agents that may be readily selected by one of ordinary skill in the art. Foamed polymer blends may be formed by blending blowing agent(s) with polymer material, as is well known by those of ordinary skill in the art. Polymeric, ceramic, metal, or glass microspheres, or combinations thereof, may be used to adjust the density or other properties of a given layer, and such microspheres may be solid or hollow, and filled or unfilled. Fillers are typically also added to one or more portions of the golf ball to modify the density thereof to conform to uniform golf ball standards.
In balls with liquid centers, a mixture of corn syrup, salt, and water may be used. Corn syrup and salt are added to increase the specific gravity and viscosity. In another embodiment, water may used as the liquid. In yet another embodiment, a barium sulfate paste may be employed.
In one embodiment, the center of the golf ball is formed from a polybutadiene composition including tungsten filler with a surrounding layer of a foamed, resilient thermoplastic elastomer, such as a partially or fully neutralized ionomer.
Hard Covers
In the first embodiment of the present invention, to achieve a golf ball with a high lift coefficient, low drag coefficient, and low spin, the cover hardness is preferably about 60 Shore D or greater. In one embodiment, the cover hardness is about 65 Shore D or greater. More preferably, the hardness of the cover is about 61 Shore D to about 67 Shore D.
In one embodiment, the cover has a flexural modulus of between about 60,000 psi and about 70,000 psi. A high flexural modulus may aid in lowering the spin rate, as well as providing increased initial velocity, which may be a benefit to a low swing-speed player.
A wide variety of cover materials may be used to design a golf ball having a low spin rate, high lift coefficient, and low drag coefficient according to the first embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment, the cover is formed from ionomer resins. Blends of ionomers, including acid-containing olefin copolymer ionomers, may also be used to form the cover for the first embodiment of the invention. These ionomers are copolymers of an olefin such as ethylene and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid such as acrylic or methacrylic acid present in about 5 to about 35 weight percent of the polymer, preferably about 10 to about 35 weight percent of the polymer, and more preferably about 15 to about 20 weight percent of the polymer, wherein the acid moiety is neutralized from about 1 percent to about 100 percent, preferably at least about 40 percent, and more preferably at least about 60 percent, to form an ionomer by a cation such as lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, barium, lead, tin, zinc or aluminum, or a combination of such cations, of which lithium, sodium and zinc are preferred. Specific acid-containing ethylene copolymers include ethylene/acrylic acid, ethylene/methacrylic acid, ethylene/acrylic acid/n-butyl acrylate, ethylene/methacrylic acid/n-butyl acrylate, ethylene/methacrylic acid/iso-butyl acrylate, ethylene/acrylic acid/iso-butyl acrylate, ethylene/methacrylic acid/n-butyl methacrylate, ethylene/acrylic acid/methyl methacrylate, ethylene/acrylic acid/methyl acrylate, ethylene/methacrylic acid/methyl acrylate, ethylene/methacrylic acid/methyl methacrylate, and ethylene/acrylic acid/n-butyl methacrylate. In one embodiment, the acid-containing ethylene copolymers include ethylene/methacrylic acid, ethylene/acrylic acid, ethylene/methacrylic acid/n-butyl acrylate, ethylene/acrylic acid/n-butyl acrylate, ethylene/methacrylic acid/methyl acrylate and ethylene/acrylic acid/methyl acrylate copolymers. In a preferred embodiment, the acid-containing ethylene copolymers are ethylene/methacrylic acid, ethylene/acrylic acid, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/n-butyl acrylate, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/ethyl acrylate, and ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/ethyl acrylate ad. ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid/methyl acrylate copolymers.
The manner in which these ionomers resins are made is well known in the art, such as through the process described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,262,272, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. A non-limiting example of a suitable blend for a hard cover is a composition including ionomer resins that are copolymers of about 80 percent to about 95 percent of an olefin, e.g., ethylene, and about 13 percent to about 16 percent by weight of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid, wherein about 10 percent to about 90 percent of the carboxylic acid groups are neutralized with a metal ion. In one embodiment, a first ionomer is neutralized with lithium and a second ionomer is neutralized with sodium. In another embodiment, the blend comprises between about 10 percent and about 65 percent of the lithium ionomer and between about 90 percent and about 45 percent of the sodium ionomer. In another embodiment, the blend is a 50/50 blend. Examples of commercially available ionomers include SURLYN® 8140, which is a sodium ionomer, SURLYN® 9910, which is a zinc ionomer, and SURLYN® 7940, which is a standard lithium ionomer.
Soft Covers
In the second embodiment of the invention, a golf ball having a low lift coefficient, a low drag coefficient, and high spin, preferably has a soft cover. The cover in this embodiment is about 60 Shore D or less, preferably about 55 Shore D or less, and more preferably about 45 Shore to about 55 Shore D. Suitable materials for a soft cover layer include, but are not limited to, balata, very low modulus ionomers, and blends thereof. In one embodiment, the materials for a soft cover layer include those with a flexural modulus of about 65,000 psi or less. Other non-limiting examples of materials for use with a soft cover layer include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,298,571, 5,120,791, 5,068,151, 5,000,549, 3,819,768, 4,264,075, 4,526,375, 4,911, 451, 5,197,740, and 3,264,272.
Additional components that can be added to the golf ball compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to, UV stabilizers; light stabilizers; antioxidants; dyes; optical brighteners; white, colored and/or fluorescent pigments; violet agents; softening agents; waxes; surfactants; processing aids; plasticizers, including internal and external plasticizers; impact modifiers; toughening agents; reinforcing materials and metallic powders, such as titanium, tungsten and copper powders. All of these materials, which are well known in the art, are added for their usual purpose in typical amounts, as is well known to the person of ordinary skill in the art.
While the above invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, it should be kept in mind that the scope of the present invention is not limited to just these embodiments. One skilled in the art would recognize numerous variations of the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, features of one embodiment can be combined with features of another embodiment. One skilled in the art may find other variations of the preferred embodiments which, nevertheless, fall within the spirit of the present invention, whose scope is defined by the claims set forth below.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/333,358, filed Jan. 18, 2006, now pending, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3262272 | Barakauskas et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
| 3264272 | Rees | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3819768 | Molitor | Jun 1974 | A |
| 4264075 | Miller et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4526375 | Nakade | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4911451 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4925193 | Melvin et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 5000549 | Yamazaki | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5068151 | Nakamura | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5120791 | Sullivan | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5197740 | Pocklington et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5249804 | Sanchez | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5298571 | Statz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5562552 | Thurman | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5566943 | Boehm | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5575477 | Hwang | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5682230 | Anfinsen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5824746 | Harris et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5836832 | Boehm et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5846141 | Morgan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5919100 | Boehm et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935023 | Maehara et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5957787 | Hwang | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6025442 | Harris et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6117025 | Sullivan | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6149535 | Bissonnette et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6152834 | Sullivan | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6186002 | Lieberman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6213892 | Felker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6213898 | Ogg | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6285445 | Winfield et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6290615 | Ogg | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6299552 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6338684 | Winfield et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6358161 | Aoyama | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6394913 | Nesbitt et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6482110 | Ogg | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6494795 | Sullivan | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6533682 | Sullivan | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6729976 | Bissonnette et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6796912 | Dalton et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6902402 | McClintic | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6902498 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6908402 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 20050059510 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2001-514058 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2002-224242 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2002-331047 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2003-000763 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2003-521283 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2003-296655 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2005-296655 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2007 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Final Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2008 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Advisory Action dated Nov. 10, 2008 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Advisory Action dated Dec. 4, 2008 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2009 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2009 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Advisory Action dated Mar. 22, 2010 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2010 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2010 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2011 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Advisory Action dated Mar. 6, 2012 of corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/333,358. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130303309 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11333358 | Jan 2006 | US |
| Child | 13939574 | US |
