The present invention relates to golf balls, and more particularly, to golf balls having improved surface patterns. More specifically, the present invention relates to golf balls having ridges or channels on the golf ball surface.
Golf balls generally include a spherical outer surface with a plurality of dimples formed thereon. Conventional dimples are circular depressions that reduce drag and increase lift. These dimples are formed where a dimple wall slopes away from the outer surface of the ball forming the depression.
Drag is the air resistance that opposes the golf ball's flight direction. As the ball travels through the air, the air that surrounds the ball has different velocities, thus different pressures. The air exerts maximum pressure at a stagnation point on the front of the ball. The air then flows around the surface of the ball with an increased velocity and reduced pressure. At some separation point, the air separates from the surface of the ball and generates a large turbulent flow area behind the ball. This flow area, which is called the wake, has low pressure. The difference between the high pressure in front of the ball and the low pressure behind the ball slows the ball down. This is the primary source of drag for golf balls.
The dimples on a traditional golf ball cause a thin boundary layer of air adjacent to the ball's outer surface to flow in a turbulent manner. Thus, the thin boundary layer is called a turbulent boundary layer. The turbulence energizes the boundary layer and helps move the separation point further backward, so that the boundary layer stays attached further along the ball's outer surface. As a result, there is a reduction in the area of the wake, an increase in the pressure behind the ball, and a substantial reduction in drag. It is the circumference of each dimple, where the dimple wall drops away from the outer surface of the ball, which allows dimples to create the turbulence in the boundary layer.
Lift is an upward force on the ball that is created by a difference in pressure between the top of the ball and the bottom of the ball. This difference in pressure is created by a warp in the airflow that results from the ball's backspin. Due to the backspin, the top of the ball moves with the airflow, which delays the air separation point to a location further backward. Conversely, the bottom of the ball moves against the airflow, which moves the separation point forward. This asymmetrical separation creates an arch in the flow pattern that requires the air that flows over the top of the ball to move faster than the air that flows along the bottom of the ball. As a result, the air above the ball is at a lower pressure than the air underneath the ball. This pressure difference results in the overall force, called lift, which is exerted upwardly on the ball. The circumference of each dimple is important in optimizing this flow phenomenon, as well.
By using dimples to decrease drag and increase lift, almost every golf ball manufacturer has increased their golf ball flight distances. In order to improve ball performance, it is desirable to have a large number of dimples, hence a large amount of dimple circumference. In arranging the dimples, an attempt is made to minimize the space between dimples, because such space does not improve aerodynamic performance of the ball. In practical terms, this usually translates into 300 to 500 circular dimples with a conventional sized dimple having a diameter that typically ranges from about 0.100 inches to about 0.180 inches.
When compared to one conventional size dimple, theoretically, an increased number of small dimples will create greater aerodynamic performance by increasing total dimple circumference. However, in reality small dimples are not always very effective in decreasing drag and increasing lift. This results at least in part from the susceptibility of small dimples to paint flooding. Paint flooding occurs when the paint coat on the golf ball fills the small dimples, and consequently decreases the dimple's aerodynamic effectiveness.
Golf ball manufacturers continue to search for more efficient methods of changing the surface of a golf ball in order to improve the aerodynamics or to impart unique aerodynamic properties to golf balls.
The present invention is directed to a golf ball with improved surface patterns. More specifically, the present invention relates to golf balls having a system of ridges or channels on the golf ball surface. Preferably, the edge angle of the ridges or channels is more than about 16°, preferably more than about 18°, and more preferably more than about 20°.
The present invention is further directed to a golf ball comprising a substantially spherical outer surface and a channel system comprising one or more channels formed thereon. The channels of the present invention may be straight or curved, may or may not circumscribe the golf ball. The channels may or may not intersect other channels. Preferably, the surface coverage of the channels is less than about 40%, preferably less than about 30%, or less than about 20% or less than about 10%.
In some embodiments, these channels may allow the golf ball to have orientation-specific aerodynamic properties, i.e., to fly differently depending on its orientation when hit off of a tee. In other embodiments, the channels allow the ball to have greater flight symmetry. In some embodiments, there may be both channels and dimples or other features on the surface of the golf ball.
Further features and advantages of the invention can be ascertained from the following detailed description that is provided in connection with the drawings described below:
In one embodiment as illustrated in
Preferably, channels 12 have an edge angle that is steeper than edge angles for conventional circular dimples. In one example, channels 12 have substantially the same depth as conventional circular dimples, but have a width that is significantly less than the diameter of conventional circular dimples, causing the edge angle to be steeper than the edge angle of conventional circular dimples, which typically ranges from 12°-16°. The edge angle of channels 12 is preferably greater than about 16°, more preferably greater than about 18°, and more preferably greater than about 20°. The edge angle can range from about 16° to about 90°, preferably from about 18° to about 40°, and more preferably from about 20° to about 30°.
Generally, it may be difficult to define and measure an edge angle of a depression such as a dimple or a channel on a golf ball due to the indistinct nature of the boundary dividing the depression from the ball's undisturbed land surface.
Referring to
One advantage of having relatively low surface coverage is that golf ball 10 behaves more like a true sphere and less like a faceted object when putting. This would result in a truer direction of departure from the putter face, and a truer roll along the ground. This would be advantageous to all golfers, but especially to highly skilled golfers who will enjoy the full benefit of their putting skills because of the reduced influence of randomness.
In one example, as shown in
Hence, the golfer may choose orientations 14 or 16/18 to tee the ball as playing conditions dictate. For example, when teeing into the wind a low trajectory using orientation 16 or 18 is preferred and teeing with the wind a high trajectory using orientation 14 is preferred. Similar orientations are shown in
In cases where USGA or R&A standards are in force, it may be required to use a ball that flies essentially the same regardless of orientation. Accordingly, the orientation-specific aerodynamic properties produced by channels could actually be used to reduce a ball's tendency to fly differently in different orientations. Often, golf balls without channels will display orientation-specific flight characteristics due to a lack of symmetry in the arrangement of dimples, or as a result of artifacts of the manufacturing process such as seam buffing, or for other reasons. In such cases the orientation-specific properties of a system of channels could be used to partially or fully cancel those effects and make a ball that is less affected by orientation.
On the other hand, the embodiments shown in
The channels of the present invention can be used to produce golf balls having unique or specific appearances, such as the appearances of balls used in other sports, such as baseball or tennis (
In some embodiments, it may be desirable to include dimples, bumps, or other surface textures on the golf ball surface in addition to the channels. The dimples may be circular, or may have non-circular perimeters such as oval, hour-glass shape, regular and irregular polygons. Accordingly, the dimples may be triangular, rectangular, pentagonal, hexagonal, or any other suitable polygonal shape or non-polygonal shapes, or may have polygonal and non-polygonal portions. Another advantage of the present invention is that channels 12 provide more efficient demarcation lines or groupings of non-traditional dimples. Exemplary non-traditional dimples include the surface textures disclosed in parent application Ser. No. 11/025,952, previously incorporated by reference in its entirety. In one example, the surface pattern shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 of patent '952 application is added to a portion of ball 10, illustrated in
The channels are combined with dimples to increase the percentage of golf ball surface covered in dimples and channels to a level comparable to or greater than traditional golf balls. In one example, the surface coverage of channels 12 is in between about 5% to about 40% and the dimple coverage can be from about 40% to about 90%, with a total dimple/channel coverage ranging from about 60% to 95%. More preferably, the total dimple/channel coverage ranges from about 70% to 90%, and most preferably from about 75% to 85%. Theoretically the total coverage could reach virtually 100%, but this is likely to cause durability issues without producing any performance benefit.
In other embodiments, the channels are replaced with raised ridges. These ridges serve the same purposes as the channels, but may perturb the boundary layer in different, beneficial ways that may make ridges more useful for some of the purposes.
While it is apparent that the illustrative embodiments of the invention disclosed herein fulfill the objectives of the present invention, it is appreciated that numerous modifications and other embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art. Additionally, feature(s) and/or element(s) from any embodiment may be used singly or in combination with other embodiment(s) and steps or elements from methods in accordance with the present invention can be executed or performed in any suitable order. Therefore, it will be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and embodiments, which would come within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/025,952, filed on Jan. 3, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,588,505 and published under U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0148591 A1 on Jul. 6, 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/061,779, filed on Apr. 3, 2008, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/141,093, filed on May 31, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,455,601 and published under U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0221916 A1 on Oct. 6, 2005, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/077,090 filed on Feb. 15, 2002 and patented as U.S. Pat. No. 6,905,426 B2 on Jun. 14, 2005. U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/061,779 and 11/141,093 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,905,426 are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
922773 | Kempshall | May 1909 | A |
2135210 | Farrar | Nov 1938 | A |
4284276 | Worst | Aug 1981 | A |
4616828 | Haythornthwaite | Oct 1986 | A |
4830378 | Aoyama | May 1989 | A |
5547197 | Pocklington | Aug 1996 | A |
5879245 | Hwang | Mar 1999 | A |
6475105 | Murphy | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6632150 | Ogg | Oct 2003 | B1 |
20020025864 | Barfield | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040005937 | Saiz | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040224042 | Tzivanis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060281583 | Sato et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026971 | Aoyama et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090017941 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10077090 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 11141093 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12061779 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 12233649 | US | |
Parent | 11025952 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 12061779 | US | |
Parent | 11141093 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 11025952 | US |