Patent Application
20240299812
The present application claims priority to Japanese patent application JP 2023-036018, filed on Mar. 8, 2023, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present disclosure relates to a golf ball. Specifically, the present disclosure relates to a golf ball including a core, a mid layer, and a cover.
Skilled golf players may place importance on feel at impact when hitting a golf ball. Some golf players prefer soft feel at impact particularly upon an approach shot around the green.
A flexible cover of a golf ball may impair the resilience performance of the golf ball. With a low-resilience golf ball, a large flight distance may not be obtained upon a shot with an iron. To improve flight distance upon a shot with an iron, a golf ball having a low spin rate when being hit may be advantageous. In order to achieve both desired flight performance and desired controllability in a golf ball including a flexible cover, various attempts have been made to improve the structure and the material of a core.
Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2013-31640 describes a golf ball in which, when the distances (%) from the central point of a core to nine points and JIS-C hardnesses at the nine points, such nine points being obtained by dividing a region from the central point of the core to the surface of the core at intervals of 12.5% of the radius of the core, are plotted in a graph, R2 of a linear approximation curve obtained by a least-squares method is not less than 0.95, and the Shore-D hardness of a mid layer is larger than the Shore-D hardness of a cover. Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2012-130524 proposes a golf ball in which the difference between a JIS-C hardness H(5.0) at a point which is located at a distance of 5 mm from the central point of a core and a JIS-C hardness Ho at the central point is not less than 6.0, the difference between a JIS-C hardness H(12.5) at a point which is located at a distance of 12.5 mm from the central point and the hardness Ho is not greater than 4.0, the difference between a JIS-C hardness Hs at the surface of the core and the hardness H(12.5) is not less than 10.0, the difference between the hardness Hs and the hardness Ho is not less than 22.0, there is no zone in which the hardness decreases from the central point toward the surface of the core, and the Shore-D hardness of a mid layer is larger than the Shore-D hardness of a cover.
Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2013-248298 describes a golf ball in which, in a spherical core including at least one rubber layer, when JIS-C hardnesses measured at nine points obtained by equally dividing the thickness of the rubber layer at intervals of 12.5% in the radius direction of the core are plotted relative to a distance (%) from the innermost point of the rubber layer, R2 of a linear approximation curve obtained by a least-squares method is not less than 0.95, the hardness at the outermost point of the rubber layer is larger than the hardness at the innermost point of the rubber layer, and the slab hardness of a mid layer is larger than the slab hardness of a cover. Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2013-9895 proposes a golf ball which includes a core obtained by crosslinking a rubber composition containing a base rubber, a co-crosslinking agent, a crosslinking initiator, and a carboxylate and two or more covers and in which the JIS-C hardness of the innermost layer of the cover is larger than the JIS-C hardness at the surface of the core.
Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2015-77405 describes a golf ball in which relational expressions of (1) D−C≥7, (2) C−B≤7, (3) (D−C)−(C−B)≥7, and (4) E−A≥16 are satisfied when the radius of a core is denoted by R (mm), a JIS-C hardness at the central point of the core is denoted by A, a JIS-C hardness at a position away from the central point of the core by R/3 mm is denoted by B, a JIS-C hardness at a position away from the central point of the core by R/1.8 mm is denoted by C, a JIS-C hardness at a position away from the central point of the core by R/1.3 mm is denoted by D, and a JIS-C hardness at the surface of the core is denoted by E.
Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2017-77355 describes a golf ball in which, in a hardness distribution of a core, a JIS-C hardness Hc at the central point of the core, a JIS-C hardness H12 at a position away from the central point of the core by 12 mm, and a JIS-C hardness Ho at the surface of the core satisfy (1) 0≤H12−Hc≤15, (2) 15≤Ho−H12≤30, (3) (Ho−H12)−(H12−Hc)≥10, and (4) 20≤Ho−Hc≤40, and a spin index which is the product of (Ho−H12)−(H12−Hc) and the dynamic friction coefficient of the ball is not less than 3.0. Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2019-198465 discloses a golf ball in which, in a hardness distribution of a core, the difference (Cs−Cc) between a Shore-C hardness Cc at the central point of the core and a Shore-C hardness Cs at the surface of the core is not less than 28, and as for a Shore-C hardness at a midpoint M between the central point and the surface of the core, Shore-C hardnesses at points away from the midpoint M to the core surface side by 2.5 mm, 5.0 mm, and 7.5 mm, and Shore-C hardnesses at points away from the midpoint M to the core central point side by 2.5 mm, 5.0 mm, and 7.5 mm, areas A to F obtained from the hardness difference between the respective positions and the differences between the respective specific distances satisfy a specific mathematical formula.
Golf players' requirements for golf balls have increased more than ever. There is still room for improvement in feel at impact, flight performance, and controllability of golf balls.
A golf ball disclosed in the present specification can include a spherical core, a mid layer positioned outside the core, and a cover positioned outside the mid layer. The golf ball can satisfy the following relational expressions (1) to (4):
Ho≤H1≤H2≤Hs (1),
Ho≤Hs (2),
(Hs−Ho)*(3/2)≤(Hm−Hc) (3), and
(Hs−Hc)*(3/2)≤(Hm−Hs) (4),
wherein
The FIG. is a partially cutaway cross-sectional view showing a golf ball according to or more embodiments of the present disclosure.
Hereinafter, preferred embodiments will be described in detail with appropriate reference to the drawing. In the present specification, unless otherwise mentioned, hardness is read as Shore-C hardness.
It can be an intention according to one or more embodiments of the present4 disclosure to provide a golf ball including a flexible cover and having excellent flight performance upon a shot with an iron. Additionally or alternatively, it can be an intention according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure to provide a golf ball also having excellent spin performance upon an approach shot.
In golf balls according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, the hardness distribution inside the core and the hardness distribution of the entire golf ball can be appropriate. The appropriate hardness distributions can compensate for resilience performance in implementing a flexible cover. The golf ball according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure can have excellent flight performance upon a shot with an iron. Additionally or alternatively, the golf ball according to one or more embodiments can have excellent spin performance upon an approach shot.
A golf ball 2 shown in
The golf ball 2 can have a diameter of not less than 40 mm and not greater than 45 mm, according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure. From the viewpoint of conformity to the rules established by the United States Golf Association (USGA), for instance, the diameter may be not less than 42.67 mm. From the viewpoint of suppression of air resistance, the diameter can be not greater than 44 mm or not greater than 42.80 mm.
The golf ball 2 can have a mass of not less than 40 g and not greater than 50 g, according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure. From the viewpoint of attainment of great inertia, the mass can be not less than 44 g and particularly preferably not less than 45.00 g. From the viewpoint of conformity to the rules established by the USGA, for instance, the mass can be not greater than 45.93 g.
From the viewpoint of the resilience performance of the golf ball 2, the core 4 can have a diameter of preferably not less than 34.8 mm, more preferably not less than 35.6 mm, and further preferably not less than 36.8 mm. From the viewpoint that the mid layer 6 and the cover 8 can have sufficient thicknesses, the diameter of the core 4 can be preferably not greater than 40.5 mm, more preferably not greater than 40.0 mm, and further preferably not greater than 39.5 mm. The core 4 can have a radius of preferably not less than 17.4 mm, more preferably not less than 17.8 mm, and further preferably not less than 18.4 mm. The radius of the core 4 can be preferably not greater than 20.25 mm, more preferably not greater than 20.0 mm, and further preferably not greater than 19.75 mm. The core 4 can have a mass of preferably not less than 10 g and not greater than 40 g.
In the golf ball 2, on a cut plane of the core 4 that has been cut into two halves, a hardness Ho at the central point of the core 4, a hardness H1 at a point to which the distance from the central point can be equal to 25% of the radius of the core 4, and a hardness H2 at a point to which the distance from the central point is equal to 75% of the radius of the core 4 can be measured. In addition, a hardness Hs can be measured at the surface of the core 4. A Shore C type hardness scale mounted to an automated hardness meter (trade name “digi test II” manufactured by Heinrich Bareiss Prüfgerätebau GmbH), as an example, may be used for measuring each hardness. The hardness Ho, the hardness H1, and the hardness H2 can be measured by pressing the hardness scale against the cut plane of the core 4. The hardness Hs can be measured by pressing the hardness scale against the surface of the core 4. All the measurements can be conducted in an environment of 23° C.
In the golf ball 2, slab hardnesses of the mid layer 6 and the cover 8 can be measured. As shown, each of the mid layer 6 and the cover 8 of the golf ball 2 can be composed or consist of a single layer. In a golf ball according to another embodiment, the mid layer 6 may be formed of a plurality of layers, and the cover 8 may be formed of a plurality of layers. In the golf ball that includes the mid layer 6 composed of the plurality of layers, a slab hardness of the layer adjacent to the core 4, among the plurality of layers forming the mid layer 6, can be measured. In the golf ball that includes the cover 8 composed of the plurality of layers, a slab hardness of the layer located at the outermost layer, among the plurality of layers forming the cover 8, can be measured.
The slab hardnesses of the mid layer 6 and the cover 8 can be measured according to the standards of “ASTM-D 2240-68.” For the measurement, a sheet that can be formed by hot press, that can be formed from the same material as that of the mid layer 6 or the cover 8, and that can have a thickness of about 2 mm can be used. Prior to the measurement, a sheet can be kept at a temperature of 23° C. for two weeks, for instance. At the measurement, three sheets, for instance, can be stacked. A Shore C hardness Hm of the mid layer 6 and a Shore C hardness Hc of the cover 8 can be obtained by an automated hardness meter (the aforementioned “digi test II”) to which a Shore C type hardness scale can be mounted.
The golf ball 2 according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure can achieve excellent flight performance upon a shot with an iron by the hardness Ho, the hardness H1, the hardness H2, the hardness Hs, the hardness Hm, and the hardness Hc satisfying the following relational expressions (1) to (4).
Ho≤H1≤H2≤Hs (1)
Ho≤Hs (2)
(Hs−Ho)*(3/2)≤(Hm−Hc) (3)
(Hs−Hc)*(3/2)≤(Hm−Hs) (4).
In the golf ball 2 that satisfies the above expressions (1) and (2), an appropriate hardness distribution can be formed inside the core 4. Preferably, the core 4 can have an outer hard/inner soft hardness distribution as a whole. When the golf ball 2 that includes this core 4 is hit with an iron, the spin rate can be reduced, and a large launch angle can be obtained. The flight distance of the golf ball 2 can be large. Furthermore, the core 4 can also contribute to soft feel at impact upon a shot with an iron.
In the golf ball 2 that satisfies the above expressions (3) and (4), the hardness distribution of the entire golf ball can be appropriate. Specifically, when a difference Hs-Ho between the hardness Hs and the hardness Ho is denoted by V1 and a difference Hm-Hc between the hardness Hm and the hardness Hc is denoted by V2, a value obtained by multiplying V1 by 3/2 can be equal to or smaller than V2. In other words, a difference V2−V1*3/2 between V2 and V1*3/2 may be not less than 0. In the golf ball 2, the hardness difference V2 (=Hm-Hc) between the mid layer 6 and the cover 8 can be sufficiently large with respect to the hardness difference V1 (=Hs−Ho) inside the core. With the golf ball 2, the spin rate can be reduced upon a shot with an iron, and a large flight distance can be obtained.
When a difference Hs-HC between the hardness Hs and the hardness Hc is denoted by V3 and a difference Hm-Hs between the hardness Hm and the hardness Hs is denoted by V4, a value obtained by multiplying V3 by 3/2 can be equal to or smaller than V4. In other words, a difference V4−V3*3/2 between V4 and V3*3/2 can be not less than 0. In the golf ball 2, the mid layer 6 can be hard and the cover 8 can be flexible with respect to the surface hardness Hs of the core 4. In the sphere consisting of or comprising the core 4 and the mid layer 6, an outer hard/inner soft hardness distribution can be formed as a whole. Owing to the hardness distribution formed by the core 4 and the mid layer 6, when the golf ball 2 is hit with an iron, a high ball speed and a low spin rate can be achieved, and an excessive decrease in the spin rate due to the flexible cover 8 can be avoided, for instance, so that spin performance upon an approach shot can be maintained.
In the golf ball 2, the hardness Ho, the hardness H1, the hardness H2, the hardness Hs, the hardness Hm, and the hardness Hc may not be particularly limited, and can be set as appropriate so as to satisfy the relational expressions (1) to (4). For example, the hardness Ho at the central point of the core 4 may be 56 or greater and 70 or less. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Ho is 56 or greater can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint, the hardness Ho can be more preferably 57 or greater and particularly preferably 58 or greater. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Ho is 70 or less may be regarded as having excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, the hardness Ho can be more preferably 69 or less and particularly preferably 68 or less.
The hardness H1 at the point to which the distance from the central point of the core 4 is equal to 25% of the radius of the core 4 may be 60 or greater and 74 or less. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness H1 is 60 or greater can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint, the hardness H1 may be more preferably 61 or greater and particularly preferably 62 or greater. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness H1 is 74 or less can be regarded as having excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, the hardness H1 can be more preferably 73 or less and particularly preferably 72 or less.
In the golf ball 2, according to one or more embodiments, a hardness at a point to which the distance from the central point of the core 4 is equal to 50% of the radius of the core 4 may be measured. This hardness may be 62 or greater, 63 or greater, or 64 or greater. This hardness may be 76 or less, 75 or less, or 74 or less.
The hardness H2 at the point to which the distance from the central point of the core 4 is equal to 75% of the radius of the core 4 may be 63 or greater and 77 or less. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness H2 is 63 or greater can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint, the hardness H2 can be more preferably 64 or greater and particularly preferably 65 or greater. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness H2 is 77 or less may be regarded as having excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, the hardness H2 can be more preferably 76 or less and particularly preferably 75 or less.
The hardness Hs at the surface of the core 4 may be 68 or greater and 82 or less. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Hs is 68 or greater can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint, the hardness Hs can be more preferably 69 or greater and particularly preferably 70 or greater. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Hs is 82 or less can be regarded as having excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, the hardness Hs can be more preferably 81 or less and particularly preferably 80 or less.
The Shore-C hardness Hm of the mid layer 6 may be 86 or greater and 100 or less. The mid layer 6 having a hardness Hm of 86 or greater can contribute to reducing a spin rate. From the viewpoint of suppressing spin, the hardness Hm can be more preferably 90 or greater and particularly preferably 94 or greater. When the golf ball 2 that includes the mid layer 6 having a hardness Hm of 100 or less is hit, the spin rate may not be excessively reduced. From the viewpoint of approach performance, the hardness Hm can be more preferably 99.5 or less and particularly preferably 99 or less.
The Shore-C hardness Hc of the cover 8 may be 53 or greater and 79 or less. The cover 8 having a hardness Hc of 53 or greater may not be regarded as impairing the flight performance of the golf ball 2. From this viewpoint, the hardness Hc can be more preferably 61 or greater and particularly preferably 67 or greater. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Hc is 79 or less can be regarded as having excellent spin performance upon an approach shot. From this viewpoint, the hardness Hc can be more preferably 76 or less and particularly preferably 75 or less.
As described above, in the core 4, the hardness Hs can be larger than the hardness Ho. When the difference Hs−Ho between the hardness Hs and the hardness Ho is denoted by V1, from the viewpoint of feel at impact, the difference V1 can be preferably not less than 5, more preferably not less than 8, and further preferably not less than 10 in Shore-C hardness. From the viewpoint of spin performance, the difference V1 can be preferably not greater than 25, more preferably not greater than 20, and further preferably not greater than 15.
From the viewpoint of suppressing spin, a golf ball 2 in which the hardness Hm is larger than the hardness Hc may be preferable. When the difference Hm-Hc between the hardness Hm and the hardness Hc is denoted by V2, the difference V2 can be preferably not less than 15, more preferably not less than 18, and further preferably not less than 20 in Shore-C hardness. From the viewpoint of spin performance upon an approach shot, the difference V2 can be preferably not greater than 40, more preferably not greater than 38, and further preferably not greater than 35.
The hardness Hc may be larger than the hardness Hs or may be smaller than the hardness Hs. From the viewpoint of feel at impact and spin performance, preferably, in the golf ball 2 according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, the hardness Hc and the hardness Hs can further satisfy the following relational expression (5).
Hc≤Hs (5).
When the difference Hs-HC between the hardness Hs and the hardness Hc is denoted by V3, from the viewpoint of spin performance, the difference V3 can be preferably not less than −1, more preferably not less than 0, and further preferably not less than 3 in Shore-C hardness. From the viewpoint of not impairing resilience performance, the difference V3 can be preferably not greater than 16, more preferably not greater than 13, and further preferably not greater than 10.
From the viewpoint that an outer hard/inner soft hardness distribution is formed in the sphere consisting of or comprising the core 4 and the mid layer 6, a golf ball 2 in which the hardness Hm is larger than the hardness Hs may be preferable. When the difference Hm-Hs between the hardness Hm and the hardness Hs is denoted by V4, from the viewpoint of suppressing spin, the difference V4 can be preferably not less than 10, more preferably not less than 12, and further preferably not less than 15 in Shore-C hardness. From the viewpoint of approach performance, the difference V4 can be preferably not greater than 30, more preferably not greater than 28, and further preferably not greater than 25.
As described above, in the golf ball 2 according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, when the difference Hs−Ho between the hardness Hs and the hardness Ho is denoted by V1 and the difference Hm-Hc between the hardness Hm and the hardness Hc is denoted by V2, the difference V2−V1*3/2 between V2 and V1*3/2 can be not less than 0. From the viewpoint of suppressing spin, the difference V2−V1*3/2 can be preferably not less than 2, more preferably not less than 4, and further preferably not less than 5. From the viewpoint of feel at impact, the difference V2−V1*3/2 can be preferably not greater than 22, more preferably not greater than 20, and further preferably not greater than 18.
As described above, in the golf ball 2, when the difference Hs-HC between the hardness Hs and the hardness Hc is denoted by V3 and the difference Hm-Hs between the hardness Hm and the hardness Hs is denoted by V4, the difference V4−V3*3/2 between V4 and V3*3/2 may be not less than 0. From the viewpoint of flight performance, the difference V4−V3*3/2 can be preferably not less than 5, more preferably not less than 6, and further preferably not less than 9. From the viewpoint of approach performance, the difference V4−V3*3/2 can be preferably not greater than 26, more preferably not greater than 23, and further preferably not greater than 20.
Preferably, according to one or more embodiments, in the golf ball 2, the hardness Ho and the hardness Hc can further satisfy the following relational expression (6).
Ho≤Hc (6).
The cover 8 included in the golf ball 2 that satisfies the above expression (6) can be regarded as being moderately flexible. The golf ball 2 can be regarded as having excellent spin performance (controllability) upon an approach shot while maintaining an initial ball speed upon a shot with an iron. When a difference Hc-Ho between the hardness Hc and the hardness Ho is denoted by V5, from the viewpoint of flight performance, the difference V5 can be preferably not less than −4, more preferably not less than 0, and further preferably not less than 3. From the viewpoint of spin performance, the difference V5 can be preferably not greater than 15, more preferably not greater than 14, and further preferably not greater than 13.
Preferably, in the golf ball 2, according to one or more embodiments, the hardness Hm and the hardness H2 can further satisfy the following relational expression (7).
(Hm−H2)≥23 (7).
The golf ball 2 that satisfies the above expression (7) can be regarded as having a higher ball speed when hit with an iron. When a difference Hm−H2 between the hardness Hm and the hardness H2 is denoted by V6, from the viewpoint of flight performance, the difference V6 can be preferably not less than 23, more preferably not less than 24, and further preferably not less than 25. From the viewpoint of feel at impact, the difference V6 can be preferably not greater than 30, more preferably not greater than 29, and further preferably not greater than 27.
Preferably, in the golf ball 2 according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, the hardness Hm and the hardness H1 can further satisfy the following relational expression (8).
(Hm−H1)≤36 (8).
The golf ball 2 that satisfies the above expression (8) can be regarded as having a higher ball speed when hit with an iron. When a difference Hm−H1 between the hardness Hm and the hardness H1 is denoted by V7, from the viewpoint of flight performance, the difference V7 can be preferably not less than 20, more preferably not less than 22, and further preferably not less than 25. From the viewpoint of feel at impact, the difference V7 can be preferably not greater than 36, more preferably not greater than 35, further preferably not greater than 33, and even further preferably not greater than 32.
From the viewpoint of suppressing spin, the mid layer 6 can have a thickness Tm of preferably not less than 0.5 mm, more preferably not less than 0.6 mm, and further preferably not less than 0.8 mm. From the viewpoint that the resilience performance of the core 4 can be exerted, the thickness Tm can be preferably not greater than 3.0 mm, more preferably not greater than 2.5 mm, and further preferably not greater than 2.0 mm. In the case where the mid layer 6 is formed of a plurality of layers, the sum of the thicknesses of the respective layers can be regarded as the thickness Tm. The thickness Tm can be measured at a position immediately below the land 12, as an example.
From the viewpoint of suppressing spin, the cover 8 can have a thickness Tc of preferably not greater than 2.0 mm, more preferably not greater than 1.8 mm, and further preferably not greater than 1.5 mm. From the viewpoint of approach performance and durability, the thickness Tc can be preferably not less than 0.1 mm, more preferably not less than 0.2 mm, and further preferably not less than 0.5 mm.
From the viewpoint of obtaining soft feel at impact, the core 4 can have an amount of compressive deformation Dc of preferably not less than 3.40 mm, more preferably not less than 3.60 mm, and further preferably not less than 3.80 mm. From the viewpoint of durability, the amount of compressive deformation Dc of the core 4 can be preferably not greater than 5.40 mm, more preferably not greater than 5.20 mm, and further preferably not greater than 5.00 mm.
From the viewpoint of approach performance and feel at impact, the golf ball 2 can have an amount of compressive deformation Db of preferably not less than 3.0 mm, more preferably not less than 3.05 mm, and further preferably not less than 3.10 mm. From the viewpoint of resilience performance, the amount of compressive deformation Db of the golf ball 2 can be preferably not greater than 3.40 mm, more preferably not greater than 3.35 mm, and further preferably not greater than 3.30 mm.
For measurement of an amount of compressive deformation, a YAMADA type compression tester “SCH” may be used. In the tester, a sphere such as the core 4 and the golf ball 2 can be placed on a rigid plate made of metal, for instance. Next, a cylinder made of metal can be controlled to gradually descend toward the sphere. The sphere squeezed between the bottom face of the cylinder and the hard plate can become deformed. A movement distance of the cylinder, starting from the state in which an initial load (e.g., of 98 N) is applied to the sphere up to the state in which a final load (e.g., of 1274 N) is applied thereto, can be measured as an amount of compressive deformation. A movement speed of the cylinder until the initial load is applied can be 0.83 mm/s, as an example. A movement speed of the cylinder after the initial load is applied until the final load is applied can be 1.67 mm/s, for instance.
Hereinafter, preferable constituent materials for the core 4, the mid layer 6, and the cover 8 in this embodiment will be sequentially described, but other constituent materials may be used as long as one or more of the objects intended by the applicant can be achieved.
The core 4 can be formed by crosslinking a rubber composition. Examples of preferable base rubbers for the rubber composition can include polybutadienes, polyisoprenes, styrene-butadiene copolymers, ethylene-propylene-diene copolymers, and natural rubbers. From the viewpoint of resilience performance of the core 4, polybutadienes may be preferable. When a polybutadiene and another rubber are used in combination, it may be preferred that the polybutadiene is a principal component. Specifically, the proportion of the polybutadiene to the entire base rubber can be preferably not less than 50% by mass and particularly preferably not less than 80% by mass. A polybutadiene in which the proportion of cis-1,4 bonds is not less than 80% can be particularly preferable. Another rubber used in combination of a polybutadiene can be preferably a polyisoprene.
The rubber composition of the core 4 can preferably contain a co-crosslinking agent. Preferable co-crosslinking agents from the viewpoint of durability and resilience performance of the golf ball 2 can be monovalent or bivalent metal salts of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 2 to 8 carbon atoms. Examples of preferable co-crosslinking agents can include zinc acrylate, magnesium acrylate, zinc methacrylate, and magnesium methacrylate. Zinc acrylate and zinc methacrylate can be preferable, and zinc acrylate can be more preferable.
The rubber composition may contain a metal oxide and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 2 to 8 carbon atoms. They both can react with each other in the rubber composition to obtain a salt. The salt can serve as a co-crosslinking agent. Examples of preferable α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids can include acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. Examples of preferable metal oxides can include zinc oxide and magnesium oxide.
The amount of the co-crosslinking agent per 100 parts by mass of the base rubber can be preferably not less than 10 parts by mass and not greater than 45 parts by mass. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not less than 10 parts by mass may be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint, this amount can be more preferably not less than 15 parts by mass and particularly preferably not less than 20 parts by mass. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not greater than 45 parts by mass can be regarded as having excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, this amount can be more preferably not greater than 40 parts by mass and particularly preferably not greater than 35 parts by mass.
Preferably, the rubber composition of the core 4 can contain an organic peroxide. The organic peroxide can serve as a crosslinking initiator. The organic peroxide can contribute to the durability and the resilience performance of the golf ball 2. Examples of suitable organic peroxides can include dicumyl peroxide, 1,1-bis(t-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexane, and di-t-butyl peroxide. An organic peroxide with particularly high versatility can be dicumyl peroxide.
The amount of the organic peroxide per 100 parts by mass of the base rubber can be preferably not less than 0.1 parts by mass and not greater than 3.0 parts by mass. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not less than 0.1 parts by mass can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint, this amount can be more preferably not less than 0.3 parts by mass and particularly preferably not less than 0.5 parts by mass. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not greater than 3.0 parts by mass can be regarded as having excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, this amount can be more preferably not greater than 2.5 parts by mass and particularly preferably not greater than 2.0 parts by mass.
Preferably, the rubber composition of the core 4 can contain an organic sulfur compound. The organic sulfur compound can contribute to flight distance upon a shot with an iron. Organic sulfur compounds can include naphthalenethiol compounds, benzenethiol compounds, and disulfide compounds.
Examples of naphthalenethiol compounds can include 1-naphthalenethiol, 2-naphthalenethiol, 4-chloro-1-naphthalenethiol, 4-bromo-1-naphthalenethiol, 1-chloro-2-naphthalenethiol, 1-bromo-2-naphthalenethiol, 1-fluoro-2-naphthalenethiol, 1-cyano-2-naphthalenethiol, 1-acetyl-2-naphthalenethiol, and metal salts thereof. Preferable metal salts can be zinc salts.
Examples of benzenethiol compounds can include benzenethiol, 4-chlorobenzenethiol, 3-chlorobenzenethiol, 4-bromobenzenethiol, 3-bromobenzenethiol, 4-fluorobenzenethiol, 4-iodobenzenethiol, 2,5-dichlorobenzenethiol, 3,5-dichlorobenzenethiol, 2,6-dichlorobenzenethiol, 2,5-dibromobenzenethiol, 3,5-dibromobenzenethiol, 2-chloro-5-bromobenzenethiol, 2,4,6-trichlorobenzenethiol, 2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorobenzenethiol, 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzenethiol, 4-cyanobenzenethiol, 2-cyanobenzenethiol, 4-nitrobenzenethiol, 2-nitrobenzenethiol, and metal salts thereof. Preferable metal salts can be zinc salts.
Examples of disulfide compounds can include diphenyl disulfide, bis(4-chlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(3-chlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(4-bromophenyl)disulfide, bis(3-bromophenyl)disulfide, bis(4-fluorophenyl)disulfide, bis(4-iodophenyl)disulfide, bis(4-cyanophenyl)disulfide, bis(2,5-dichlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(3,5-dichlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(2,5-dibromophenyl)disulfide, bis(3,5-dibromophenyl)disulfide, bis(2-chloro-5-bromophenyl)disulfide, bis(2-cyano-5-bromophenyl)disulfide, bis(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(2-cyano-4-chloro-6-bromophenyl)disulfide, bis(2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorophenyl)disulfide, and bis(2,3,4,5,6-pentabromophenyl)disulfide.
The amount of the organic sulfur compound per 100 parts by mass of the base rubber can be preferably not less than 0.1 parts by mass and not greater than 1.5 parts by mass. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not less than 0.1 parts by mass can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint, this amount can be more preferably not less than 0.2 parts by mass and particularly preferably not less than 0.3 parts by mass. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not greater than 1.5 parts by mass can be regarded as having excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, this amount can be more preferably not greater than 1.3 parts by mass and particularly preferably not greater than 1.1 parts by mass. Two or more organic sulfur compounds may be used in combination.
Preferably, the rubber composition of the core 4 can contain a carboxylic acid or a carboxylate. The carboxylic acid and the carboxylate can contribute to making the hardness distribution of the core 4 appropriate. The appropriate hardness distribution can reduce a spin rate upon a shot with an iron. An example of preferable carboxylic acids can be benzoic acid. Examples of preferable carboxylates can include zinc octoate and zinc stearate. The amount of the carboxylic acid and the carboxylate per 100 parts by mass of the base rubber can be preferably not less than 0.5 parts by mass, more preferably not less than 0.8 parts by mass, and particularly preferably not less than 1.0 part by mass. This amount can be preferably not greater than 20 parts by mass, more preferably not greater than 15 parts by mass, and particularly preferably not greater than 10 parts by mass.
The rubber composition of the core 4 may contain a filler for the purpose of specific gravity adjustment and the like. Examples of suitable fillers can include zinc oxide, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, and magnesium carbonate. The amount of the filler can be determined as appropriate so that the intended specific gravity of the core 4 can be achieved.
The rubber composition of the core 4 may contain various additives, such as sulfur, an anti-aging agent, a coloring agent, a plasticizer, a dispersant, and the like, in an adequate amount or amounts. The rubber composition may contain crosslinked rubber powder or synthetic resin powder.
Compression molding can be suitable for the core 4. In the compression molding, the rubber composition can be placed into a mold having a cavity. The rubber composition can be pressurized and heated in the cavity. Due to the pressurization, the rubber composition can be caused to flow in the cavity. Due to the heating, the rubber can undergo a crosslinking reaction. In the compression molding, the rubber composition can be pressurized at a relatively low pressure, and the rubber composition can be heated at a relatively high temperature, whereby the core 4 in which the hardness Ho, the hardness H1, the hardness H2, and the hardness Hs satisfying the above-described expressions (1) and (2) can be formed. The compression molding may be accomplished in a plurality of stages. Different molding conditions may be employed in the plurality of stages.
The mid layer 6 can be positioned outside the core 4. The material of the mid layer 6 can be a resin composition. Preferably, the mid layer 6 can be formed from a thermoplastic resin composition. Examples of the base polymer of the resin composition can include ionomer resins, thermoplastic polyester elastomers, thermoplastic polyamide elastomers, thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers, thermoplastic polyolefin elastomers, and thermoplastic polystyrene elastomers. Ionomer resins may be particularly preferable. Ionomer resins can be regarded as highly elastic. The golf ball 2 that includes the mid layer 6 including an ionomer resin can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. The golf ball 2 can be regarded as having excellent flight performance upon a shot with an iron.
An ionomer resin and another resin may be used in combination according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure. In this case, from the viewpoint of resilience performance, the ionomer resin can be contained as the principal component of the base polymer. The proportion of the ionomer resin to the entire base polymer can be preferably not less than 50% by mass.
Examples of preferable ionomer resins can include binary copolymers formed with an α-olefin and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 to 8 carbon atoms. A preferable binary copolymer can include 80% by mass or greater and 90% by mass or less of an α-olefin, and 10% by mass or greater and 20% by mass or less of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid. The binary copolymer can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. Examples of other preferable ionomer resins can include ternary copolymers formed with: an α-olefin; an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 to 8 carbon atoms; and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylate ester having 2 to 22 carbon atoms. A preferable ternary copolymer can include 70% by mass or greater and 85% by mass or less of an α-olefin, 5% by mass or greater and 30% by mass or less of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid, and 1% by mass or greater and 25% by mass or less of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylate ester. The ternary copolymer can be regarded as having excellent resilience performance. For the binary copolymer and the ternary copolymer, preferable α-olefins can be ethylene and propylene, while preferable α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids can be acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. A particularly preferable ionomer resin can be a copolymer formed with ethylene and acrylic acid. Another particularly preferable ionomer resin can be a copolymer formed with ethylene and methacrylic acid.
In the binary copolymer and the ternary copolymer, some of the carboxyl groups can be neutralized with metal ions. Examples of metal ions for use in neutralization can include sodium ions, potassium ions, lithium ions, zinc ions, calcium ions, magnesium ions, aluminum ions, and neodymium ions. The neutralization may be carried out with two or more types of metal ions. Particularly suitable metal ions from the viewpoint of resilience performance and durability of the golf ball 2 can be sodium ions, zinc ions, lithium ions, and magnesium ions.
Specific examples of ionomer resins include trade names “HIMILAN 1555,” “HIMILAN 1557,” “HIMILAN 1605,” “HIMILAN 1706,” “HIMILAN 1707,” “HIMILAN 1855,” “HIMILAN 1856,” “HIMILAN 8150,” “HIMILAN AM7311,” “HIMILAN AM7315,” “HIMILAN AM7317,” “HIMILAN AM7329,” and “HIMILAN AM7337,” manufactured by DOW-MITSUI POLYCHEMICALS CO., LTD.; trade names “SURLYN 6120,” “SURLYN 6910,” “SURLYN 7930,” “SURLYN 7940,” “SURLYN 8140,” “SURLYN 8150,” “SURLYN 8940,” “SURLYN 8945,” “SURLYN 9120,” “SURLYN 9150,” “SURLYN 9910,” “SURLYN 9945,” “SURLYN AD8546,” “HPF1000,” and “HPF2000,” manufactured by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company; and trade names “IOTEK 7010,” “IOTEK 7030,” “IOTEK 7510,” “IOTEK 7520,” “IOTEK 8000,” and “IOTEK 8030,” manufactured by ExxonMobil Chemical Corporation. Two or more ionomer resins may be used in combination.
The resin composition of the mid layer 6 may contain a filler such as zinc oxide, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, and the like. The resin composition may contain powder of a metal with a high specific gravity, such as tungsten, molybdenum, and the like, as the filler. The amount of the filler can be determined as appropriate such that the intended specific gravity of the mid layer 6 can be accomplished. This resin composition may further contain a coloring agent, a dispersant, an antioxidant, an ultraviolet absorber, a light stabilizer, a fluorescent material, a fluorescent brightener, etc., in an adequate amount. In the case where the hue of the golf ball 2 is white, a coloring agent can be titanium dioxide.
For forming the mid layer 6, methods such as injection molding, compression molding, and the like can be employed.
The cover 8 can be positioned outside the mid layer 6. The material of the cover 8 can be a resin composition. Preferably, the cover 8 can be formed from a thermoplastic resin composition. Examples of the base polymer of the resin composition can include ionomer resins, thermoplastic polyester elastomers, thermoplastic polyamide elastomers, thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers, thermoplastic polyolefin elastomers, and thermoplastic polystyrene elastomers. Ionomer resins can be particularly preferable. Ionomer resins can be regarded as highly elastic. The resilience performance of the golf ball 2 that includes the cover 8 containing an ionomer resin may not be impaired. The golf ball 2 can achieve both desired approach performance and desired flight performance. According to one or more embodiments, the ionomer resins described above for the mid layer 6 can be used for the cover 8.
An ionomer resin and another resin may be used in combination. In this case, from the viewpoint of resilience performance, the ionomer resin can be contained as the principal component of the base polymer. The proportion of the ionomer resin to the entire base polymer can be preferably not less than 50% by mass, more preferably not less than 70% by mass, and particularly preferably not less than 80% by mass.
A preferable resin that can be used in combination with an ionomer resin can be an ethylene-(meth)acrylic acid copolymer. This copolymer can be obtained by a copolymerization reaction of a monomer composition that contains ethylene and (meth)acrylic acid. In this copolymer, some of the carboxyl groups can be neutralized with metal ions. This copolymer can include 3% by mass or greater and 25% by mass or less of a (meth)acrylic acid component. An ethylene-(meth)acrylic acid copolymer having a polar functional group may be particularly preferable. A specific example of ethylene-(meth)acrylic acid copolymers can be trade name “NUCREL” manufactured by DOW-MITSUI POLYCHEMICALS CO., LTD.
The resin composition of the cover 8 may contain a coloring agent, a filler, a dispersant, an antioxidant, an ultraviolet absorber, a light stabilizer, a fluorescent material, a fluorescent brightener, etc., in an adequate amount. In the case where the hue of the golf ball 2 is white, a coloring agent can be titanium dioxide.
For forming the cover 8, methods such as injection molding, compression molding, and the like can be employed. During molding of the cover 8, the dimples 10 can be formed by pimples formed on the cavity face of a mold.
Hereinafter, one or more advantageous effects of golf balls according to Examples will be shown, but the scope disclosed in the present specification should not be construed in a limited manner based on the description of these Examples.
A rubber composition A was obtained by kneading 100 parts by mass of a high-cis polybutadiene (trade name “BR-730”, manufactured by JSR Corporation), 25.5 parts by mass of zinc acrylate, 5 parts by mass of zinc oxide, 19 parts by mass of barium sulfate, 0.8 parts by mass of dicumyl peroxide, 0.5 parts by mass of pentachlorothiophenol zinc salt, and 2 parts by mass of polyterpene phenol. The rubber composition A was placed into a mold including upper and lower mold halves each having a hemispherical cavity. The rubber composition A was pressurized and heated under the following conditions to obtain a core having a diameter of 38.7 mm.
A resin composition M1 for a mid layer was obtained by kneading 50 parts by mass of an ionomer resin (aforementioned “HIMILAN AM7329”), 25 parts by mass of another ionomer resin (aforementioned “HIMILAN 1605”), 25 parts by mass of still another ionomer resin (aforementioned “SURLYN 8150”), 6 parts by mass of barium sulfate, 4 parts by mass of titanium dioxide, and 0.2 parts by mass of a light stabilizer (trade name “JF-90”, manufactured by Johoku Chemical Co., Ltd.) with a twin-screw kneading extruder. The core was placed into a mold including upper and lower mold halves each having a hemispherical cavity. The core was covered with the resin composition M1 by injection molding to form a mid layer. The thickness of the mid layer was 1.00 mm.
A resin composition C1 was obtained by kneading 80 parts by mass of an ionomer resin (aforementioned “HIMILAN 1855”), 20 parts by mass of an ethylene-(meth)acrylic acid copolymer (trade name “NUCREL N1050H”, manufactured by DOW-MITSUI POLYCHEMICALS CO., LTD.), 4 parts by mass of titanium dioxide, and 0.2 parts by mass of a light stabilizer (aforementioned “JF-90”) with a twin-screw kneading extruder. The sphere consisting of the core and the mid layer was placed into a mold including upper and lower mold halves each having a hemispherical cavity. The sphere was covered with the resin composition C1 by injection molding to form a cover. The thickness of the cover was 1.00 mm.
A clear paint including a two-component curing type polyurethane as a base material was applied to this cover to obtain a golf ball of Example 1 having a diameter of about 42.7 mm and a mass of about 45.6 g.
Golf balls of Examples 2 to 10 and Comparative Examples 1 to 4 were obtained in the same manner as Example 1, except that the specifications of the core, the mid layer, and the cover and the vulcanization conditions for the core were set as shown in Tables 4 to 6 below. The composition of the core and the vulcanization conditions are shown in detail in Table 1 below. The composition of the mid layer is shown in detail in Table 2 below. The composition of the cover is shown in detail in Table 3 below.
[Flight Distance with Iron (I #7)]
A 7-iron (trade name “XXIO 12”, manufactured by Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., shaft hardness: S) was attached to a swing machine manufactured by Golf Laboratories, Inc. A golf ball was hit under a condition of a head speed of 37 m/sec. The flight distance (m) from the launch point to the stop point, the ball speed (m/sec) immediately after the hit, and the spin rate (rpm) were measured. The average value of data obtained by 12 measurements for each golf ball was used as a measurement value for the golf ball. The ball speed, the spin rate, and the flight distance thus obtained are shown in Tables 4 to 6 below.
[Approach Performance: Hit with Sand Wedge (SW)]
A wedge (trade name “558 RTX2.0 Tour Satin Wedge”, manufactured by Cleveland Golf Company, Inc., shaft hardness: S, loft angle: 52 degrees) was attached to a swing machine manufactured by Golf Laboratories, Inc. A golf ball was hit under a condition of a head speed of 16 m/sec, and the spin rate (rpm) was measured. The average value of data obtained by 12 measurements for each golf ball is shown in Tables 4 to 6 below.
The details of the compounds listed in Table 1 are as follows.
Polybutadiene: high-cis polybutadiene rubber, manufactured by JSR Corporation, trade name “BR730” (cis-1,4-bond content=96% by mass, 1,2-vinyl bond content=1.3% by mass, Mooney viscosity (ML1+4(100° C.))=55, molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn)=3)
The details of the compounds listed in Table 2 are as follows.
The details of the compounds listed in Table 3 are as follows.
As shown in Tables 4 to 6, the golf ball of each Example particularly can be regarded as having excellent flight performance upon a shot with an iron. Additionally or alternatively, the golf ball of each Example can be regarded as having excellent controllability upon an approach shot. From the evaluation results, one or more advantages of the golf ball according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure are clear.
Present Disclosure (1) is a golf ball including a spherical core, a mid layer positioned outside the core, and a cover positioned outside the mid layer, the golf ball satisfying the following relational expressions (1) to (4):
Ho≤H1≤H2≤Hs (1),
Ho≤Hs (2),
(Hs−Ho)*(3/2)≤(Hm−Hc) (3), and
(Hs−Hc)*(3/2)≤(Hm−Hs) (4),
wherein
Present Disclosure (2) is the golf ball according to Present Disclosure (1), further satisfying the following relational expression (5):
Hc≤Hs (5).
Present Disclosure (3) is the golf ball according to Present Disclosure (1) or (2), further satisfying the following relational expression (6):
Ho≤Hc (6).
Present Disclosure (4) is the golf ball according to any one of Present Disclosures (1) to (3), further satisfying the following relational expression (7):
(Hm−H2)≥23 (7).
Present Disclosure (5) is the golf ball according to any one of Present Disclosures (1) to (4), further satisfying the following relational expression (8):
(Hm−H1)≤36 (8).
Present Disclosure (6) is the golf ball according to any one of Present Disclosures (1) to (5), wherein
Present Disclosure (7) is the golf ball according to any one of Present Disclosures (1) to (6), wherein
The golf ball according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure can be used for, for example, playing golf on golf courses and practicing at driving ranges.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-036018 | Mar 2023 | JP | national |
