This application claims priority on Patent Application No. 2007-65948 filed in JAPAN on Mar. 15, 2007. The entire contents of this Japanese Patent Application are hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to golf balls. More particularly, the present invention relates to improvement of dimples of golf balls.
2. Description of the Related Art
Golf balls hit by a golf club make a flight with accompanying back spin. The back spin results in lift force that acts on the golf ball. The lift force leads to satisfactory height of a trajectory and flight duration of the golf ball, whereby a great flight distance can be achieved.
Due to excessive backspin, a great drag acts on the golf ball. The drag can reduce the flight distance. In light of suppression of the drag, the spin rate is preferably lower. However, low spin rate may result in insufficient lift force.
Golf balls in recent years achieve both a low spin rate and a great launch angle. A great height of the trajectory and flight duration can be attained by a great launch angle. A great launch angle compensates for insufficiency of the lift force. However, this complementation is not enough.
Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2002-186684 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,780,128) discloses a golf ball having dimples with large size. A great lift force can be attained by the dimples with large size even though the spin rate is low. However, the drag is not sufficiently suppressed according to this golf ball.
Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication Nos. Hei 9-70449 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,735,757), 2000-279553 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,368,238) and 2004-321529 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,986,720) disclose golf balls having dimples with a contrived cross-sectional shape. However, these golf balls still exhibit insufficient lift force when the spin rate is low.
Top concern to golf players for golf balls is their flight distance. There exists room for improvement of flight performances of the golf balls. An object of the present invention it to provide a golf ball that is excellent in the flight performance.
The golf ball according to the present invention has a land and numerous dimples on the surface thereof. The proportion of total area of all the dimples to the surface area of the phantom sphere is equal to or greater than 75%. The mean diameter of these dimples is equal to or greater than 4.0 mm. The proportion of the number of the dimples having a diameter of equal to or greater than 4.3 mm to total number of the dimples is equal to or greater than 30%. These dimples include dimples having a particular shape. The dimples having the particular shape are characterized as in the following (1) to (3):
(1) having a first curved face that has ring-shape, and that is continuous with the land at the edge of the dimple and is projecting upwards;
(2) having a second curved face that has a bowl-shape, and that is continuous with the first curved face, and is projecting downwards and having a curvature radius of equal to or greater than 10 mm; and
(3) with the depth of the boundary of the first curved face and the second curved face accounting for 1% or greater and 10% or less of the depth of the dimple.
In this golf ball, the first curved face is present in the vicinity of the edge. The shape in the vicinity of the edge is different from those of conventional golf balls. The first curved face is responsible for suppression of the drag. Furthermore, an adequate lift force is achieved due to the first curved face. This golf ball is excellent in the flight performance.
Preferably, the proportion of the number of the dimples having the particular shape to total number of the dimples is equal to or greater than 50%. Preferably, standard deviation of the dimple diameter is equal to or less than 0.2 mm.
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail according to preferred embodiments with appropriate references to the accompanying drawing.
Golf ball 2 shown in
This golf ball 2 has a diameter of 40 mm or greater and 45 mm or less. From the standpoint of conformity to a rule defined by United States Golf Association (USGA), the diameter is more preferably equal to or greater than 42.67 mm. In light of suppression of the air resistance, the diameter is more preferably equal to or less than 44 mm, and particularly preferably equal to or less than 42.80 mm. The weight of this golf ball 2 is 40 g or greater and 50 g or less. In light of attainment of great inertia, the weight is more preferably equal to or greater than 44 g, and particularly preferably equal to or greater than 45.00 g. From the standpoint of conformity to a rule defined by USGA, the weight is more preferably equal to or less than 45.93 g.
The core 4 is formed by crosslinking a rubber composition. Illustrative examples of the base rubber for use in the rubber composition include polybutadienes, polyisoprenes, styrene-butadiene copolymers, ethylene-propylene-diene copolymers and natural rubbers. Two or more kinds of the rubbers may be used in combination. In light of the resilience performance, polybutadienes are preferred, and high cis-polybutadienes are particularly preferred.
For crosslinking of the core 4, a co-crosslinking agent is suitably used. Examples of the co-crosslinking agent that is preferable in light of the resilience performance include zinc acrylate, magnesium acrylate, zinc methacrylate and magnesium methacrylate. Into the rubber composition, an organic peroxide may be preferably blended together with the co-crosslinking agent. Examples of suitable organic peroxide include dicumyl peroxide, 1,1-bis(t-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexane and di-t-butyl peroxide.
Various kinds of additives such as a sulfur compound, a filler, an anti-aging agent, a coloring agent, a plasticizer, a dispersant and the like may be blended in an adequate amount into the rubber composition of the core 4 as needed. Into the rubber composition may be also blended crosslinked rubber powder or synthetic resin powder.
The core 4 has a diameter of equal to or greater than 30.0 mm, and particularly equal to or greater than 38.0 mm. The core 4 has a diameter of equal to or less than 42.0 mm, and particularly equal to or less than 41.5 mm. The core 4 may be composed of two or more layers. A mid layer may be provided between the core 4 and the cover 6.
Polymer which may be suitably used in the cover 6 is an ionomer resin. Examples of preferred ionomer resin include binary copolymers formed with α-olefin and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 or more and 8 or less carbon atoms. Examples of other preferred ionomer resin include ternary copolymers formed with α-olefin, an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 or more and 8 or less carbon atoms, and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylate ester having 2 or more and 22 or less carbon atoms. In such binary copolymer and ternary copolymer, preferable α-olefin is ethylene and propylene, and preferable α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid is acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. In these binary copolymer and ternary copolymer, a part of the carboxyl group is neutralized with a metal ion. Illustrative examples of the metal ion for use in neutralization include sodium ion, potassium ion, lithium ion, zinc ion, calcium ion, magnesium ion, aluminum ion and neodymium ion.
Other polymer may be used in place of or together with the ionomer resin. Illustrative examples of the other polymer include thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers, thermoplastic styrene elastomers, thermoplastic polyamide elastomers, thermoplastic polyester elastomers and thermoplastic polyolefin elastomers.
Into the cover 6 may be blended a coloring agent such as titanium dioxide, a filler such as barium sulfate, a dispersant, an antioxidant, an ultraviolet absorbent, a light stabilizer, a fluorescent agent, a fluorescent brightening agent and the like in an appropriate amount as needed. The cover 6 may be also blended with powder of a highly dense metal such as tungsten, molybdenum or the like for the purpose of adjusting the specific gravity.
The cover 6 has a thickness of equal to or greater than 0.3 mm, and particularly equal to or greater than 0.4 mm. The cover 6 has a thickness of equal to or less than 2.5 mm, and particularly equal to or less than 2.2 mm. The cover 6 has a specific gravity of equal to or greater than 0.90, and particularly equal to or greater than 0.95. The cover 6 has a specific gravity of equal to or less than 1.10, and particularly equal to or less than 1.05. The cover 6 may be composed of two or more layers.
In
In
The first curved face 14 has ring-shape. The first curved face 14 is projecting upwards. Preferably, the first curved face 14 has a cross-sectional shape being a circular arc. In
The second curved face 16 has a bowl-shape. The second curved face 16 is positioned at the center of the dimple 8. The second curved face 16 is projecting downwards. Preferably, the second curved face 16 has a cross-sectional shape being a circular arc. In
Although detailed grounds are unknown, the dimple 8 having the first curved face 14 and the second curved face 16 suppresses the drag, and serves in achieving an adequate lift force. This golf ball 2 is excellent in the flight performance.
In
The curvature radius R1 is preferably equal to or greater than 0.2 mm. The first curved face 14 having a curvature radius R1 of equal to or greater than 0.5 mm is responsible for suppression of the drag. In this respect, the curvature radius R1 is more preferably equal to or greater than 0.5 mm. The curvature radius R1 is preferably equal to or less than 2.0 mm. The first curved face 14 having a curvature radius R1 of equal to or less than 2.0 mm suppresses an excessive lift force. In this respect, the curvature radius R1 is more preferably equal to or less than 1.0 mm.
The second curved face 16 has a curvature radius R2 of equal to or greater than 10 mm. This second curved face 16 serves in achieving an adequate lift force. In this respect, the curvature radius R2 is more preferably equal to or greater than 12 mm. In light of suppression of the drag, and suppression of excessive lift force, the curvature radius R2 is preferably equal to or less than 25 mm, and more preferably equal to or less than 18 mm.
In
W=(Di−D2)/2
The width W is preferably 0.05 mm or greater and 0.15 mm or less. The first curved face 14 having a width W of equal to or greater than 0.05 mm suppresses the drag, and serves in achieving an adequate lift force. The first curved face 14 having a width W of equal to or less than 0.15 mm suppresses an excessive lift force. The adequate lift force suppresses hopping of the golf ball 2.
In the present invention, the dimple 8 characterized as in the following (1) to (3) is referred to as “dimple having a particular shape”:
(1) having a first curved face 14 that has ring-shape, and that is continuous with the land 10 at the edge Ed of the dimple 8 and is projecting upwards;
(2) having a second curved face 16 that has a bowl-shape, and that is continuous with the first curved face 14, and is projecting downwards and having a curvature radius R2 of equal to or greater than 10 mm; and
(3) with the depth d1 of the boundary of the first curved face 14 and the second curved face 16 accounting for 1% or greater and 10% or less of the depth de of the dimple 8.
Inspection of
In light of the flight performance, the proportion P2 of the number of the dimples 8 having the particular shape to total number of the dimples 8 is preferably equal to or greater than 50%, and more preferably equal to or greater than 80%. Ideally, this proportion P2 is 100%.
Area s of the dimple 8 is an area of a region surrounded by the contour line when the center of the golf ball 2 is viewed at infinity. In instances of a circular dimple 8, the area s is calculated by the following formula:
s=(Di/2)2·π.
In the golf ball 2 shown in
According to the present invention, the proportion of sum total of area s of all the dimples 8 to the surface area of the phantom sphere 12 is referred to as an occupation ratio. From the standpoint that an adequate lift force may be attained, the occupation ratio is preferably equal to or greater than 75%, and more preferably equal to or greater than 79%. From the standpoint that interference among the dimples 8 can be suppressed, the occupation ratio is preferably equal to or less than 90%. According to the golf ball 2 shown in
The mean diameter Da of the dimple 8 is preferably equal to or greater than 4.0 mm. The golf ball 2 having a mean diameter Da of equal to or greater than 4.0 mm achieves a sufficient lift force. In this respect, the mean diameter Da is more preferably equal to or greater than 4.2 mm. In light of suppression of the drag, and suppression of excessive lift force, the mean diameter Da is preferably equal to or less than 4.9 mm. The mean diameter Da of the golf ball 2 shown in
The proportion P3 of the number of the dimples 8 having a diameter of equal to or greater than 4.3 mm to total number of the dimples 8 is preferably equal to or greater than 30%. According to the golf ball 2 having the proportion P3 of equal to or greater than 30%, a sufficient lift force is achieved. In this respect, the proportion P3 is more preferably equal to or greater than 60%. Ideally, the proportion P3 is 100%. The proportion P3 in the golf ball 2 shown in
It is preferred that the standard deviation Σ of the diameter of the dimple 8 be equal to or less than 0.2 mm. According to the golf ball 2 having a standard deviation Σ of equal to or less than 0.2 mm, an adequate lift force is achieved. In this respect, the standard deviation Σ is more preferably equal to or less than 0.1 mm. Ideally, all the dimples 8 have an identical diameter. Therefore, ideal standard deviation Σ is zero assuming that there exists no error in manufacture. Since the mean diameter Da in the golf ball 2 shown in
Σ=(((4.40−4.06)2·100+(4.00−4.06)2·112+(3.85−4.06)2·60+(3.80−4.06)2·60)/332)1/2
The standard deviation Σ of in this golf ball 22 is 0.24.
According to the present invention, the term “dimple volume” means a volume of a part surrounded by a plane that includes the contour of the dimple 8, and the surface of the dimple 8. In light of possible suppression of hopping of the golf ball 2, total volume of the dimples 8 is preferably equal to or greater than 280 mm3, and more preferably equal to or greater than 300 mm3. In light of possible suppression of dropping of the golf ball 2, the total volume is preferably equal to or less than 350 mm3, and more preferably equal to or less than 330 mm3.
From the standpoint that a sufficient occupancy ratio can be achieved, total number of the dimples 8 is preferably equal to or greater than 200, more preferably equal to or greater than 252, and particularly preferably equal to or greater than 272. From the standpoint that respective dimples 8 can have a sufficient diameter, the total number is preferably equal to or less than 362, more preferably equal to or less than 350, and particularly preferably equal to or less than 332.
A rubber composition was obtained by kneading 100 parts by weight of polybutadiene (trade name “BR-18”, available from JSR Corporation), 30 parts by weight of zinc diacrylate, 6 parts of zinc oxide, 10 parts by weight of barium sulfate, 0.5 parts by weight of diphenyl disulfide and 0.5 part by weight of dicumyl peroxide. This rubber composition was placed into a mold having upper and lower mold half each having a hemispherical cavity, and heated at 170° C. for 18 minutes to obtain a core having a diameter of 40.0 mm. On the other hand, 50 parts by weight of an ionomer resin (available from Du Pont-MITSUI POLYCHEMICALS Co., Ltd.; trade name “Himilan 1605”), 50 parts by weight of other ionomer resin (available from Du Pont-MITSUI POLYCHEMICALS Co., Ltd.; trade name “Himilan 1706”) and 3 parts by weight of titanium dioxide were kneaded to obtain a resin composition. The aforementioned core was placed into a mold having numerous protrusions on the inside face, followed by injection of the aforementioned resin composition around the spherical body by injection molding to form a cover having a thickness of 1.35 mm. Numerous dimples having a shape inverted from the shape of the protrusion were formed on the cover. A clear paint including a two-part liquid curable polyurethane as a base was applied on this cover to give a golf ball of Example 1 having a diameter of 42.7 mm and a weight of about 45.4 g. The compression of this golf ball measured with a tester from Atti Engineering Co. Ltd., was about 85. This golf ball has a dimple pattern shown in
Golf balls of Examples 2 to 4 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 were obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that specifications of the dimples were as shown in Table 1 below. The golf ball according to Comparative Example 2 has dimples having a cross section that has a single radius shape.
Travel Distance Test
A driver with a titanium head (trade name “XXIO”, available from SRI Sports Limited, shaft flex: S, loft angle: 10°) was attached to a swing machine, available from Golf Lab Co., Ltd. The golf ball kept at 23° C. was hit under the condition to provide a head speed of 45 m/sec. Accordingly, the distance from the launching point to the point where the ball stopped was measured. Mean values of 20 times measurement are presented in Table 2 below.
As shown in Table 2, the golf balls of Examples are excellent in the flight performances. Therefore, advantages of the present invention are clearly suggested by these results of evaluation.
The present invention can be applied to not only two-piece golf balls, but also one-piece golf balls, multi-piece golf balls and wound golf balls. The foregoing description is just for illustrative examples, and various modifications can be made in the scope without departing from the principles of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007-065948 | Mar 2007 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5735757 | Moriyama et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6368238 | Kasashima et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6780128 | Moriyama et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6986720 | Sajima et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20040102259 | Ohama et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050101412 | Sajima et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113188 | Sajima | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005-137692 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-314481 | Nov 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080227570 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |