A good grip is desirable when wielding any hand-held object. A firm and comfortable grip is important when using many hand-held tools equipped with a handle or shaft, such as hammers and axes. Moreover, many sports require a player to grip a handle or shaft on a piece of sporting equipment, e.g. tennis, cycling, hockey, golf, etc. Golfers for example strive for consistency, and a comfortable, firm grip with proper finger placement is one of the keys to a consistent golf game. Nevertheless, the typical club grip used by many golfers does not promote a comfortable, firm grip or proper finger placement.
The typical golf club grip is a single-layer molded rubber grip that has a pre-determined thickness and durometer. The durometer or hardness of the club grip is important because a player's grip on the club will not feel secure if the grip is too hard or too soft. The right club grip “feel” varies widely among golfers. Most club grips, however, are only available in a few select levels of feel, such as soft, medium, or hard.
One way to improve club grip feel is to construct grips from multiple layers of material having different ammeters. For example, Royal Precision's Multi-Density Grip employs a low durometer color compound layer over a hard black inner core layer. Royal Precision advertises that the soft outer layer provides a custom grip “feel,” while the harder inner layer maintains stability by reducing torque and twisting at impact.
A similar design is used in existing cycle grips. One example of such grips are the ZyGo cycle grips made by A'ME. ZyGo grips have an inner-skeleton molded out of a hard rubber compound surrounded by a softer, tackier outer layer. A'ME advertises that the hard inner layer prevents torque between the handle bar and the rider's hands, while the softer outer layer provides increased grip feel.
Grips with multiple layers, similar to standard single-layer grips, are typically available only available in a few select layer durometers. Thus, existing multiple-layer grips are similarly limited in their level of club grip feel. In addition, multiple layer grips do not address the problem of proper finger placement. Without a physical guide on the club grip, it is often difficult for beginning and intermediate players to locate the proper hand placement on the club grip. Thus, many players vary the placement of their hands and fingers on the club from shot to shot. This is a major contributor to a golfer's lack of consistency on the golf course.
Most club grips lack any physical contours that could assist the golfer with proper and consistent finger placement when gripping the club. This is because the typical club grip is manufactured to comply with the rules of the United States Golf Association (“USGA”), which call for a club grip that is circular in cross section with no bulges or concavity. Nevertheless, there have been several attempts to improve the consistency in golf grip hand and finger placement through the addition of physical bulges or concavity in a golf grip.
For instance, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,427,376 (“'376”), 5,480,146 (“'146”), and 6,540,621 (“'621”) describe grips that are pre-shaped or pre-molded for a typical golfer's fingers. Indentations formed or molded onto the outer surface of the club grip guide the player's fingers and hands to the same location each time they grab the club. Yet, to accommodate the indentations and the bulges that indicate finger and hand placement, these grips are generally quite large and bulky. Another problem associated with the formed or molded indentations in these grips is that the bulges and concavities are obvious to other players, which can be a source of embarrassment for the player. Of course, these club grips also violate the USGA rules.
Furthermore, because the grips disclosed by '376, '146, and '621 references are molded or formed to accommodate the hands and fingers of a typical golfer, the grips are not tailored to the physical and style characteristics of the individual player. Thus, these grips are unable to accommodate the differences in golfers' hand sizes, finger lengths, grip styles (e.g., the overlapping grip, the 10-finger grip, the interlocking grip, etc.), or a combination thereof.
There have been attempts to offer a custom-mold club grip that improves the consistency of club grip finger placement to accommodate the unique physical characteristics of a player's hands. One such attempt by a company called Fit Grip requires that a player grip a pre-heated material forming the club grip for a period of approximately 30 seconds, during which time indents are formed in the soft grip material at precisely the points where the hands and fingers contact the grip. After the grip has cooled, the impression remains permanently molded in the club. The club grip is capable of being molded additional times if necessary.
Although the molding of the club grip produces contours custom-fitted to each golfer's hands, the resulting grip is still relatively large, obvious, and fails to conform to the USGA rules. An additional drawback is that the molded club grip must be fitted by a trained professional. Many avid golfers enjoy the work required to re-grip their clubs. By performing the re-grip themselves, golfers get a more intimate feel for their golf equipment and a greater sense of confidence when the equipment is used on the course.
It is an object of the present grips to provide an adjustable level of overall grip durometer, or “feel,” in a single grip. It is another object of the present grips to instill confidence in the player by increasing the surface area of the grip in contact with the player's hands. It is yet another object of the present grips to provide a physical guide to assist in consistent and proper finger placement on a grip that is outwardly circular in cross section with no obvious bulges or concavity. It is an additional object of the present grips to provide a grip that may be custom-fitted by the player. Individual embodiments of the present grips may address some or all of these objectives,
These and other desirable characteristics of the present grips will become apparent in view of the present specification, including the claims and drawings. Although certain golf club grip examples are described in detail, the scope of this specification is not meant to limit its claims to only those examples shown. As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures and methods for carrying out the several purposes of the present grips. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present grips.
The present grips are directed to an improved gripping apparatus and method of use, including an improved golf club grip.
A preferred embodiment is, for example, a golf club grip that comprises an outer layer disposed around an inner layer. The inner layer has a higher durometer than the outer layer, which improves grip feel. The inner layer is also molded or moldable to substantially conform to the player's grip, thereby facilitating consistent finger placement. The outer layer maintains a substantially circular cross section when not gripped. Alternatively, the inner layer may be omitted and the shaft itself can be molded to substantially conform to a player's grip. In addition, a compression layer may be employed in addition to the outer layer to compress the outer layer to ensure that the outer layer maintains a circular cross section over the molded inner layer.
The preferred embodiment also may comprise a cavity disposed between an outer layer and an inner layer disposed around a shaft, or the shaft itself. The cavity may be expandable, and it may comprise a single space, or multiple sub-chambers. The sub-chambers may or may not be open to one another. The cavity may receive various substances, such as hardening agents, foam, or viscous liquids, to promote long or short-term conformity of the grip to a player's hands. Air or other gases may also be added or removed from the cavity to alter overall grip durometer, or feel. A valve may be provided for access to the cavity.
The preferred embodiment also may comprise an apparatus comprising a first material having a first durometer, and a second material having a second durometer. The first durometer is higher than the second durometer. The second material is disposed around the first material and positioned to substantially correspond to the player's finger placement, while the first material is positioned to correspond to areas of the grip that are not in contact with the player's fingers. When gripped, this arrangement guides the player's hands and fingers to the low durometer areas of the grip, which when gripped provide, in effect, concave impressions in the grip. When the grip is released, these low durometer areas return to their normal shape, giving the grip a substantially circular cross-section.
Alternatively, the durometer of the first material may be lower than the durometer of the second material. When gripped, this arrangement guides the player's hands and fingers to the areas of the grip where the low durometer inner material is the thickest.
The preferred embodiment may be manufactured as a wrap and wound around the club shaft. This wrappable grip may contain cavities, which may in turn contain other substances or materials to enhance the players grip on the club.
The durometer of inner layer 18 is higher than the durometer of outer layer 16. For example, inner layer 18 may formed from rubber, while outer layer 16 is formed from closed cell foam. Outer layer 16 may also be formed from viscoelastic foam, in which case the indentations from the player's grip would remain visible in outer layer 16 for a short amount of time before outer layer 16 returned to a substantially circular cross section. This permits players to quickly find their proper grip by sight between separate swings performed in rapid succession.
Inner layer 18 is shown molded to substantially conform to a player's grip, being thicker in non-contact areas sections of golf club grip 10 and thinner in contact areas. Thus, the player would be guided into a consistent gripping position at the thinnest portions of inner layer 18, or conversely at the thickest portions of outer layer 16. Meanwhile, when golf club grip 10 is not in use, outer layer 16 maintains a substantially circular cross section of golf club grip 10 while conforming to the contours of inner layer 18 as seen in
Inner layer 18 can be pre-configured for an approximate fit, as discussed above, or inner layer 18 can be molded to custom-fit to the player's grip. In either case, outer layer 16 maintains a substantially circular cross section of golf club grip 10.
In this configuration, the golfer can shape and re-shape the grip to his hands any number of times and the grip will retain the impressions of the golfer's hands until he/she desires to reshape the grip. For example, some advanced players will use different grips for certain specialty shots (draw, fade, punch, and chip). If a specialty shot requiring a specific grip is desired, the golfer can simply rework the inner layer to the necessary shape.
Various durometers of the clay may be employed such that it may take considerable effort to reshape. In such instances, the grip would have a greater tendency to retain its shape over prolonged periods of time, e.g. weeks, months or even years.
For a short term custom-fit, inner layer 28 of golf club grip 20 could be comprised of a closed cell foam, viscoelastic foam, or other material that regains its shape after deformation a short period of time later. This short-term custom-fit is particularly useful in golf because players may move their grip up or down the club depending on the distance to the pin or the desired ball trajectory, e.g. punch and chip shots. In this embodiment, inner layer 28 would have a lower durometer than outer layer 26. Thus, outer layer 26 and inner layer 28 maintain a substantially circular cross section until gripped, whereupon the impressions of the player's hands and fingers would be retained for a short time by inner layer 28. These impressions make inner layer 28 thicker when the grip is released and outer layer 26 returns to a substantially circular cross section. Inner layer 28 would gradually return to a circular cross section, but in the meantime the impressions of the player's grip serve to guide the player's grip into the original gripping position at the thicker portions of inner layer 28. This embodiment would be useful for making multiple shots in quick succession, as encountered on the driving range for example. For a pre-configured fit, a portion of club shaft may be used as the inner section in place of inner layer.
To achieve a desired grip feel, the firmness of golf club grip 40 over sub-chambers 43 in between landings 47 can be adjusted by adding a substance to sub-chambers 43. This substance could be added by the player or the manufacturer. For example, a viscous liquid, such as a gel, could be introduced into sub-chambers 43 to increase the feel of golf club grip 40. The gel would conform to the hand impressions of the golfer and thus provide the desired increased surface area for the golfer's hands. This has the desired effect of providing increased “feel” for the golfer when taking a swing at the ball, yet the grip may then revert back to its circular cross section shortly following release of the grip. The sequence of events is depicted in
Depending on the viscosity of the gel 45 and the internal structure of golf grip 40, the time it takes for gel-containing sub chambers 43 to revert back to substantially their original configuration may be fractions of a second to several minutes. If gel-containing sub-chambers 43 are in fluid communication, there will be a relocation or shifting of the gel 45 away from the gripped areas. Alternatively, isolated sub-chambers 43 containing with gel 45 will limit the gel from relocating to other areas of golf grip 40.
Alternatively, an adjustable firmness grip can be achieved by pressurizing or depressurizing sub-chambers to provide a custom feel in accordance with
In
Thus, when the player desiring a firmer grip feel grips the pressurized golf grip shown in
In this manner, the overall grip can have a lower or higher overall durometer, depending entirely on the desires of the individual golfer. Higher inner pressure in the inner chamber results in a harder grip, lower pressure results in a softer grip. Therefore, depending on the circumstances surrounding a particular shot, the golfer can adjust the grip to his preferences. A simple valve (not shown), preferably on the heel 51 of the golf grip so as not to interfere with the circular cross section, may be employed as the pump needle insertion point for the adjustment of the inner air pressure within the grip. The valve itself need be no more complex than the self-sealing valves found on typical inflatable basketballs, soccer balls and the like.
Yet another preferred embodiment is shown in
In
This custom molding using a hardening agent 65 results in the desired maximum surface area of the grip in contact with the golfer for the most amount of “feel.” Hardening times will depend on the hardening agent used. A compressive layer (not shown), such as a tacky tape, can employed to compress outer layer 66 and ensure a circular cross section over hardened, molded sub-chambers 63. Sub-chambers 63 may be initially filled with an open-celled foam, or other porous material that will accept the hardening agent.
If the golfer desires the hardest or highest durometer inner core, hardening agent 65 may be a type of epoxy resin. Various epoxies may be appropriate. For example, epoxies blended with lightweight “microspheres” provides the typical hardness of epoxy, yet are much less dense and therefore lighter in weight than epoxies without microspheres. Microspheres are essentially hollow air-filled particles that take up space within the hardening matrix without adding any additional weight. The microsphere replaces its volume with air as opposed to the parent substrate. Alternatively, various polyurethanes with predetermined durometers can be used. Typical durometers for these materials range from 40 Shore A hardness to 72 Shore D. Polyurethanes may also be filled with microspheres to reduce the density or weight of the filler within the grip.
Another preferred embodiment of golf club grip 70 is depicted in
In this embodiment, the player's grip would be guided into position over sub-chambers 73 in between landings 75. In other words, the player's grip would gravitate to areas of lower overall golf grip durometer. Much like the embodiment shown in
Several other embodiments relate to the structure of
Yet another variation of golf grip 80 as disclosed by
Yet another preferred embodiment relates to the structure of a golf grip in relation to the method for installing the grip. For example,
As shown in
Wrappable grip 91 may also be configured such that sub chambers 93 contain a viscous gel 101, as shown in
As appropriate, a kit may be provided to the player that provides all the necessary materials to regrip his clubs with the desired grips. For instance, the kit may include an air pressure-adjustable grip, the standard double-sided tape and solvent typically used to regrip golf clubs, and a small air pump and pressure gauge that would fit within the golfer's bag (not shown).
Alternatively, the kit may include filling materials, if required. For instance, if the grip is to be filled with a hardening material such as the polyurethanes, the kit 110 may include grips 112, standard double-sided tape 118 and solvent 119, and a pre-filled syringe 114 with the desired materials in the proper volume. If the filler material is a two part system, such as with epoxies and urethanes, the resin 116 and the catalyst hardener 117 may be provided in individual syringes or a single syringe that mixes the two parts upon injection into the grip as shown in
While the present golf club grip has been described in connection with one or more preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the present golf club grip is not limited to those embodiments. On the contrary, the present golf club grip includes all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
It should also be understood that the translation of the present technique to other hand held equipment equipped with a handle or shaft should be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. By way of example, and not limitation, the present apparatus and methods may translate to certain tools and sporting equipment. Therefore, although the embodiments are described in the context of a golf club grip, the various applications of the present apparatus and methods are not so limited.
It is also to be realized that the optimum dimensional relationships for the parts of the present golf club grip, including variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use, are deemed readily apparent and obvious to one skilled in the art, and all equivalent relationships to those illustrated in the drawings and described in the specification are intended to be encompassed by the present golf club grip.
Therefore, the foregoing is merely illustrative of the principles of the invention. Since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the golf club grip to the exact construction and operation shown and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/937,763 tiled on Jul. 9, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/253,205 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,506,418) filed on Oct. 5, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/372,207 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,066,585) filed on Feb. 17, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/888,466 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,510,483) filed on Jul. 9, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1436579 | Dayton | Nov 1922 | A |
1450155 | Watson | Mar 1923 | A |
2000295 | Oldham | May 1935 | A |
2091512 | Marsh | Aug 1937 | A |
2103889 | Brisick | Dec 1937 | A |
2205769 | Sweetland | Jun 1940 | A |
2704668 | Park, Sr. | Mar 1955 | A |
2962288 | Lowden | Nov 1960 | A |
2971933 | Huntington | Feb 1961 | A |
3028283 | Lundgren | Apr 1962 | A |
3140873 | Goodwin | Jul 1964 | A |
3227455 | Huisman | Jan 1966 | A |
3311375 | Onions | Mar 1967 | A |
3344684 | Steere, Jr. et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3638295 | Sparks | Feb 1972 | A |
3837647 | Jacques | Sep 1974 | A |
4000903 | Swanson | Jan 1977 | A |
4067573 | Key, Jr. | Jan 1978 | A |
4089070 | Cherry | May 1978 | A |
4261567 | Uffindell | Apr 1981 | A |
4617697 | David | Oct 1986 | A |
4720279 | Fritschen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4785495 | Dellis | Nov 1988 | A |
4819939 | Kobayashi | Apr 1989 | A |
5000599 | McCall et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
D320058 | Reyes | Sep 1991 | S |
5067573 | Uchida | Nov 1991 | A |
5155878 | Dellis | Oct 1992 | A |
5171011 | Squadroni | Dec 1992 | A |
5253367 | Lappley | Oct 1993 | A |
5261665 | Downey | Nov 1993 | A |
5322290 | Minami | Jun 1994 | A |
RE34767 | Soong | Oct 1994 | E |
5355552 | Huang | Oct 1994 | A |
5427376 | Cummings | Jun 1995 | A |
5480146 | Comer | Jan 1996 | A |
5584096 | Aurora | Dec 1996 | A |
5588921 | Parsick | Dec 1996 | A |
5634859 | Nesbitt | Jun 1997 | A |
5653643 | Falone | Aug 1997 | A |
5695418 | Huang | Dec 1997 | A |
5795254 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5876134 | Tseng et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5911617 | Chou | Jun 1999 | A |
5944617 | Falone et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5979015 | Tamaribuchi | Nov 1999 | A |
5984795 | Stafford | Nov 1999 | A |
5988909 | Luke, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6022278 | Vela | Feb 2000 | A |
6148483 | DeGraff | Nov 2000 | A |
6220129 | Shimansky | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223627 | Jan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6267697 | Sulenta | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295900 | Julicher et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6394909 | Laibangyang | May 2002 | B1 |
6428865 | Huang | Aug 2002 | B1 |
D462404 | Huang | Sep 2002 | S |
D462405 | Schmitt, Jr. | Sep 2002 | S |
6447190 | Kwitek | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6482105 | Lin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6511386 | Cacicedo | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6540621 | Robinson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558270 | Kwitek | May 2003 | B2 |
6656054 | Ulrich | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6656057 | Manual | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6832413 | Applewhite et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6843732 | Huang | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6959469 | Blauer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7004655 | Ferrara | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006075 | Olson | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7115043 | Leadbetter et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D546659 | Smith | Jul 2007 | S |
7334298 | Willat et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335325 | Pierson | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7470199 | Huang | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D622341 | Pepin | Aug 2010 | S |
7789777 | Tucker, Sr. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8192296 | Pinkart | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8727904 | Vay | May 2014 | B1 |
D737915 | Su | Sep 2015 | S |
9999815 | Davis | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10112087 | Huang | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20010055994 | Kwitek | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020052248 | Chen | May 2002 | A1 |
20020107088 | Lamkin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132678 | Matzie | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142858 | Chen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170144 | Agate, Sr. et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005533 | Woodnorth et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024074 | Hartman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030029002 | Willat | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045369 | Murray | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074766 | Tillim | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084756 | Schroder et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123917 | Willat et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030216192 | Chu | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220153 | Hung | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040043827 | Lamkin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043828 | Goldfader | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050205 | Putnam | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040121850 | Rohrer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040185958 | Huang | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205937 | Blauer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205938 | Blauer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217555 | Willat et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040219990 | Huang | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224786 | Reardon | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040259661 | Chen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050022283 | LoMedico | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050148401 | Huang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170905 | Chen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187031 | Kwitek | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050221909 | Nam | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060021196 | Blauer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058110 | Beak | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060137144 | Tillim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060276262 | Lin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070287551 | Wang | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
389365 | Mar 1933 | GB |
2120557 | Dec 1983 | GB |
2002028264 | Jan 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180345104 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13937763 | Jul 2013 | US |
Child | 16059345 | US | |
Parent | 13253205 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 13937763 | US | |
Parent | 12372207 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 13253205 | US | |
Parent | 10888466 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 12372207 | US |