Golf club head having a composite face insert

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7871340
  • Patent Number
    7,871,340
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 22, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 18, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
A golf club head having a composite face insert attached to a metallic body is provided. The club head preferably has a volume of at least 200 cc and provides superior durability and club performance. The face insert includes prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight (FAW) of less than 100 g/m2. The face insert preferably has a thickness less than 4 mm and a mass at least 10 grams less than an insert of equivalent volume formed of the metallic material of the body of the club head. A metallic cap with a peripheral rim is also provided to protect the ends of the composite material of the face insert. Related methods of manufacturing and alternative materials are disclosed. The resin content of the prepreg plies can be controlled through management of the timing and environment in which the resultant prepreg plies are cured and soaked.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates generally to golf club heads and, more particularly, to a wood-type golf club head having a composite face insert.


Composite materials have long been recognized for combining many beneficial attributes of various types and are commonly used in golf club heads. Composite materials typically are less dense than other materials used in golf clubs. Thus, the use of composite materials allows for more leeway in how weight is distributed about the club. It is often desirable to locate club weight away from the striking face. Thus, attempts have been made to incorporate composite materials in the club face.


Although such attempts have been generally effective for weight reduction purposes, a number of shortfalls remain, such as durability, impact resistance and overall club performance. For example, prior composite club faces have often suffered from delamination, or peeling apart, of composite layers, greatly reducing the usable life of the club. Delamination is particularly a problem at interface regions between the composite material and other materials of the club head. Such problems have arisen even at relatively low impact levels, hit counts and in benign playing conditions. Attempts to resolve such problems often fail to provide satisfactory club performance, measured by factors such as coefficient of restitution (COR), particularly for wood-type club heads having a volume of at least 300 cc. It should, therefore, be appreciated that there exists a need for a wood-type golf club head having composite material at the club face that is durable, can endure high level impacts and yet provide superior club performance. The present invention fulfills this need and others.


It should, therefore, be appreciated that there exists a need for a wood-type golf club head having composite material at the club face that is durable, can endure high level impacts and yet provide superior club performance. The present invention fulfills this need and others.


SUMMARY

The invention provides a golf club head having a lightweight face insert attached to a body that is at least partly formed of a metallic material, providing superior durability and club performance. To that end, the face insert comprises prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight (FAW) of less than 100 g/m2. The body preferably forms a volume of at least 200 cc. The face insert preferably has a thickness less than 4 mm and has a mass at least 10 grams less than an insert of equivalent volume formed of the metallic material of the body of the club head. The coefficient of restitution for the club head, measured in accordance to the United States Golf Association Rule 4-1a, is at least 0.79.


In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the face insert further includes a cap with a peripheral rim that is attached to a front surface of the composite region. Also preferably, the thickness of the composite region is about 4.5 mm or less and the metallic cap thickness is about 0.5 mm or less; more preferably the thickness of the composite region is about 3.5 mm or less and the metallic cap thickness is about 0.3 mm or less. The cap preferably comprises a titanium alloy. The face insert may alternatively comprise a layer of textured film co-cured with the plies of low FAW material, in which the layer of textured film forms a front surface of the face insert instead of the metallic cap. The layer of textured film preferably comprises nylon fabric. Without the metallic cap, the mass of the face insert is at least 15 grams less than an insert of equivalent volume formed of the metallic material of the body of the club head.


A preferred method of the present invention advantageously controls the resin content of the low fiber areal weight (FAW) composite material of the golf club face. The steps comprise:

    • stacking and cutting a plurality of prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight (FAW) of less than 100 g/m2 to form an uncured face insert having substantially a final desired shape, bulge and roll;
    • placing the uncured face insert into a tool with an initial temperature T1;
    • curing the uncured face insert for about 5 minutes at a first pressure P1 then initiating heating the tool to a set temperature T2 greater than or equal to the initial temperature T1 and curing another 15 minutes at a second pressure P2 greater than the first pressure P1, thus obtaining the cured face insert;
    • continue forming the cured face insert at the set temperature and second pressure P2 for about 30 minutes; and
    • soaking the cured face insert for 5 minutes at a third pressure P3 less than the second pressure P2, such that the desired resin content is achieved.


Alternatively, the tool temperature may be immediately raised to a set temperature T2 upon placement of the composite material therein, this temperature being held substantially constant over the soaking and curing phases. After an initial soaking time of about 5 minutes, the pressure is raised from a first pressure P1 to a second pressure P2 greater than the first pressure P1. After an additional time of about 15 minutes, the pressure is reduced to about the same value as the first pressure for about another 20 minutes.


For purposes of summarizing the invention and the advantages achieved over the prior art, certain advantages of the invention have been described above. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.


All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment disclosed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the following drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is an exploded view of a club head in accordance with the invention, depicting a composite face insert and a metallic body.



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the club head of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is an exploded view of the composite region of the face insert of FIG. 1 showing the plies comprising the composite region.



FIG. 4 is a close-up view of area A-A of the club head of FIG. 2, depicting a junction of the composite face insert and the body portion.



FIG. 5 is a graph depicting resin viscosity over time during the soaking and curing phases for a preferred method of forming the composite portion of the face insert of FIG. 1.



FIG. 6 is a graph depicting pressure over time during the soaking and curing phases of forming the composite portion of the face insert, corresponding to FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 is a graph depicting temperature over time during the soaking and curing phases of forming the composite portion of the insert, corresponding to FIG. 5.



FIG. 8 is a graph depicting pressure over time during the soaking and curing phases of an alternative method of forming the composite portion of the insert of FIG. 1.



FIG. 9 is a graph depicting temperature over time during the soaking and curing phases of forming the composite portion of the insert, corresponding to FIG. 8.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

With reference to the illustrative drawings, and particularly FIGS. 1 and 2, there is shown a golf club head 10 having a metallic body 12 and a face insert 14 comprising a composite region 16 and a metallic cap 18. The face insert 14 is durable and yet lightweight. As a result, weight can be allocated to other areas of the club head 10, enabling the club head's center of gravity to be desirably located farther from the striking face 40 and to further enhance the club head's moment of inertia. The body 12 includes an annular ledge 32 for supporting the face insert 14. In a preferred embodiment, the body 12 is formed by investment casting a titanium alloy. With the face insert 14 in place, the club head 10 preferably defines a volume of at least 200 cc and more preferably a volume of at least 300 cc. The club head 10 has superior durability and club performance, including a coefficient of restitution (COR) of at least 0.79.


With reference to FIG. 3, the composite region 16 of the face insert 14 is configured to have a relatively consistent distribution of reinforcement fibers across a cross section of its thickness to facilitate efficient distribution of impact forces and overall durability. The composite region 16 includes prepreg plies, each ply having a fiber reinforcement and a resin matrix selected to contribute to the club's durability and overall performance. Tests have demonstrated that composite regions formed of prepreg plies having a relatively low fiber areal weight (FAW) provide superior attributes in several areas, such as, impact resistance, durability and overall club performance. More particularly, FAW values below 100 g/m2, or preferably 70 g/m2 or more preferably 50 g/m2, are considered to be particularly effective. Several prepreg plies having a low FAW can be stacked and still have a relatively uniform distribution of fiber across the thickness of the stacked plies. In contrast, at comparable resin content (R/C) levels, stacked plies of prepreg materials having a higher FAW tend to have more significant resin rich regions, particularly at the interfaces of adjacent plies, than stacked plies of lower FAW materials. It is believed that resin rich regions tend to inhibit the efficacy of the fiber reinforcement, particularly since the force resulting from golf ball impact is generally transverse to the orientation of the fibers of the fiber reinforcement. Preferred methods of manufacturing, which aid in reducing resin rich regions, are discussed in detail further below.


Due to the efficiency of prepreg plies of low FAW, the face insert 14 can be relatively thin, preferably less than about 4.5 mm and more preferably less than about 3.5 mm. Thus, use of the face insert 14 results in weight savings of about 10 g to 15 g over a comparable volume of metal used in the body 12 (e.g., Ti-6Al-4V). As mentioned above, this weight can be allocated to other areas of the club, as desired. Moreover, the club head 10 has demonstrated both superior durability and performance. In a durability test, the club head 10 survived over 3000 impacts of a golf ball shot at a velocity of about 44 m/sec. In a performance test of the club's COR, measured in accordance with the United States Golf Association Rule 4-1a, the club head had a COR of about 0.828.


With continued reference to FIG. 3, each prepreg ply of the composite region 16 preferably has a quasi-isotropic fiber reinforcement, and the plies are stacked in a prescribed order and orientation. For convenience of reference, the orientation of the plies is measured from a horizontal axis of the club head's face plane to a line aligned with the fiber orientation of each ply. A first ply 20 of the composite region 16 is oriented at 0 degrees, followed by ten to twelve groups of plies (22, 24, 26) each having four plies oriented at 0, +45, 90 and −45 degrees, respectively. Thereafter, a ply 28 oriented at 90 degrees precedes the final or innermost ply 30 oriented at 0 degrees. In this embodiment, the first and final plies are formed of a prepreg material reinforced by glass fibers, such as 1080 glass fibers. The remaining plies are formed of prepreg material reinforced by carbon fiber.


A suitable carbon fiber reinforcement comprises a carbon fiber known as “34-700” fiber, available from Grafil, Inc., of Sacramento, Calif., which has a tensile modulus of 234 Gpa (34 Msi) and tensile strength of 4500 Mpa (650 Ksi). Another suitable fiber, also available from Grafil, Inc., is a carbon fiber known as “TR50S” fiber which has a tensile modulus of 240 Gpa (35 Msi) and tensile strength of 4900 Mpa (710 Ksi). Suitable epoxy resins known as Newport 301 and 350 are available from Newport Adhesives & Composites, Inc., of Irvine, Calif.


In a preferred embodiment, the composite region 16 includes prepreg sheets having a quasi-isotropic fiber reinforcement of 34-700 fiber having an areal weight of about 70 g/m2 and impregnated with an epoxy resin (e.g., Newport 301) resulting in a resin content (R/C) of about 40%. For convenience of reference, the primary composition of a prepreg sheet can be specified in abbreviated form by identifying its fiber areal weight, type of fiber, e.g., 70 FAW 34-700. The abbreviated form can further identify the resin system and resin content, e.g., 70 FAW 34-700/301, R/C 40%. In a durability test, several plies of this material were configured in a composite region 16 having a thickness of about 3.7 mm. The resulting composite region 16 survived over 3000 impacts of a golf ball shot at a velocity of about 44 m/sec. In another preferred embodiment, the composite region 16 comprises prepreg plies of 50 FAW TR50S/350. This material was tested in a composite region 16 having a thickness of about 3.7 mm and it too survived a similar durability test.


With reference to FIG. 4, the face insert 14 has sufficient structural strength that excessive reinforcement along the interface of the body 12 and the face insert 14 is not required, which further enhances beneficial weight allocation effects. In this embodiment, the body 12 is formed of a titanium alloy, Ti-6Al-4V; however, other suitable material can be used. The face insert 14 is supported by an annular ledge 32 and is secured preferably with an adhesive. The annular ledge 32 preferably has a thickness of about 1.5 mm and extends inwardly between about 3 mm to about 6 mm. The annular ledge 32 is sufficiently recessed to allow the face insert 14 to sit generally flush with a transition edge 34 of the body. Although, in this embodiment, the annular ledge 32 extends around the periphery of the front opening, it will be appreciated that other embodiments can utilize a plurality of spaced annular ledges, e.g., a plurality of tabs, to support the face insert 14.


With continued reference to FIG. 4, the metallic cap 18 of the face insert 14 includes a rim 36 about the periphery of the composite region 16. In a preferred embodiment, the metallic cap 18 may be attached to a front surface of the face insert 14, wherein the combined thickness of the prepreg plies of the face insert 14 and the metallic cap 18 are no greater than the depth D of the annular ledge 32 at the front opening of the body 12. The rim 36 covers a side edge 38 of the composite region 16 to further protect against peeling and delamination of the plies. Preferably, the rim 36 has a height substantially the same as the thickness of the face insert 14. In an alternative embodiment, the rim 36 may comprise a series of segments instead of a continuous cover over the side edge 38 of the composite region 16. The metallic cap 18 and rim 36 may be formed, for example, by stamping or other methods known to those skilled in the art. A preferred thickness of the metallic cap 18 is less than about 0.5 mm, and more preferably, it is less than about 0.3 mm. However, in embodiments having a face insert 14 without a metallic cap 18, weight savings of about 15 g can be realized.


Preferably, the thickness of the composite region 16 is about 4.5 mm or less and the thickness of the metallic cap 18 is about 0.5 mm or less. More preferably the thickness of the composite region 16 is about 3.5 mm or less and the thickness of the metallic cap 18 is about 0.3 mm or less. The metallic cap preferably comprises a titanium alloy.


Composite Material Process


The metallic cap 18 defines a striking face 40 having a plurality of grooves 42. The metallic cap 18 further aids in resisting wear from repeated impacts with golf balls even when covered with sand. Preferably, a bond gap 44 of about 0.05 mm to 0.2 mm, and more preferably about 0.1 mm, is provided for adhesive attachment of the metallic cap 18 to the composite region 16. In an alternative embodiment, the bond gap 44 may be no greater than 0.2 mm. The metallic cap 18 is preferably formed of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy; however, other titanium alloys or other materials having suitable characteristics can be employed. For example, a non-metallic cap, such as a cap comprising injection-molded plastic, having a density less than 5 g/cc and a hardness value of 80 Shore D may be employed.


As mentioned above, it is beneficial to have a composite region 16 that is relatively free of resin rich regions. To that end, fiber reinforcement sheets are impregnated with a controlled amount of resin to achieve a prescribed resin content. This is realized, in part, through management of the timing and environment in which the fiber sheets are cured and soaked.


The plies can be cut at least twice before achieving the desired dimensions. A preferred approach includes cutting plies to a first size, debulking the plies in two compression steps of about two minutes each. Thereafter, the plies are die cut to the desired shape, and compressed a third time; this time using a panel conformed to the desired bulge and roll. The plies are then stacked to a final thickness and compressed a fourth time with the conformed panel for about three minutes. The weight and thickness are measured preferably prior to the curing step.


The plies can be cut at least twice before achieving the desired dimensions. A preferred approach includes cutting plies to a first size and debulking the plies in two compression steps of about two minutes each. Thereafter, the plies are die cut to the desired shape, and compressed a third time using a panel conformed to the desired bulge and roll. The plies are then stacked to a final thickness and compressed a fourth time with the conformed panel for about three minutes. The weight and thickness of the plies are measured preferably prior to the curing step.



FIGS. 5-7 depict an effective soaking and curing profile for impregnating plies 70 FAW 34/700 fiber sheet with Newport 301 resin. Soaking and curing occurs in a tool having upper and lower plates. The tool is pre-layered with a mold release to facilitate removal of the composite material and is pre-heated to an initial temperature (T1) of about 200° F. The initial soak period is for about 5 minutes, from t0 to t1. During the soak phase, the temperature and pressure remain relatively constant. The pressure (P1) is at about 15 psi.


An alternative soaking and curing profile is depicted in FIGS. 8 and 9. In this process, the temperature of the tool is initially about 200° F. (T1) and upon placement of the composite material into the tool, the temperature is increased to about 270° F. (T2). The temperature is then kept constant. The initial pressure (P1) is about 20 psi. The initial soak period is for about 5 minutes, from t0 (0 sec.) to t′1. The pressure is then ramped up to about 200 psi (P2). The post cure phase lasts about 15 minutes (t′1 to t′2) and a final soaking/curing cycle is performed at a pressure (P1) of 20 psi for 20 minutes (t′2 to t′3).


Composite Face Roughness Treatment


In order to increase the surface roughness of the composite golf club face and to enhance bonding of adhesives used therewith, a layer of textured film can be placed on the material before curing. An example of the textured film is ordinary nylon fabric. Curing conditions do not degrade the fabric and an imprint of the fabric texture is transferred to the composite surface. Tests have shown that adhesion of urethane and epoxy, such as 3M® DP460, to the treated composite surface was greatly improved and superior to adhesion to a metallic surface, such as cast titanium alloy.


In order to increase the surface roughness of the composite region 16 and to enhance bonding of adhesives used therewith, a layer of textured film can be placed on the composite material before curing. An example of the textured film is ordinary nylon fabric. Curing conditions do not degrade the fabric and an imprint of the fabric texture is transferred to the composite surface. Tests have shown that adhesion of urethane and epoxy, such as 3M® DP460, to a composite surface treated in such a fashion was greatly improved and superior to adhesion to a metallic surface, such as cast titanium alloy.


A face insert 14 having increased surface roughness may comprise a layer of textured film co-cured with the plies of low FAW material, in which the layer of textured film forms a front surface of the face insert 14 instead of the metallic cap 18. The layer of textured film preferably comprises nylon fabric. Without the metallic cap 18, the mass of the face insert 14 is at least 15 grams less than a face insert of equivalent volume formed of the metallic material of the body 12 of the club head 10.


Typically, adhesion of the 3M® DP460 adhesive to a cast metallic surface is greater than to an untreated composite surface. Consequently, when the face structure fails on impact, the adhesive peels off the composite surface but remains bonded to the metallic surface. After treating a composite surface as described above, the situation is reversed [−] and the 3M® DP460 peels off the metallic surface but remains bonded to the composite surface.


The enhanced adhesion properties of this treatment contribute to an improved fatigue life for a composite golf club face. In a test, a club head having an untreated face insert 14 and a COR of about 0.847 endured about 250 test shots before significant degradation or failure occurred. In contrast, a similar club head having a treated face insert 14 and a COR of about 0.842 endured over 2000 shots before significant degradation or failure occurred.


Alternatively, the means for applying the composite texture improvement may be incorporated into the mold surface. By doing so, the textured area can be more precisely controlled. For simple face plate joining to the opening of a cast body, the texture can be formed in surfaces where shear and peel are the dominant modes of failure.


It should be appreciated from the foregoing that the present invention provides a club head 10 having a composite face insert 14 attached to a metallic body 12, forming a volume of at least 200 cc and providing superior durability and club performance. To that end, the face insert 14 comprises prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight (FAW) of less than 100 g/m2. The face insert 14 preferably has a thickness less than 5 mm and has a mass at least 10 grams less than a face insert of equivalent volume formed of the metallic material of the body 12 of the club head 10. The coefficient of restitution for the club head 10 is preferably at least 0.79.


Alternatively, the face insert 14 may comprise any non-metallic material having a density less than a metallic material of the body 12 along with a metallic cap 18 covering a front surface of the face insert 14 and having a rim 36. For example, the face insert 14 of the present invention may comprise a composite material, such as a fiber-reinforced plastic or a chopped-fiber compound (e.g., bulk molded compound or sheet molded compound), or an injection-molded polymer either alone or in combination with prepreg plies having low FAW. The thickness of the face insert 14 may be substantially constant or it may comprise a variation of at least two thicknesses, one being measured at a geometric center and another measured near a periphery of the face insert 14. In one embodiment, for example, an injection-molded polymer disk may be embedded in a central region of a plurality of low FAW prepreg plies. The total thickness of the face insert 14 may range between about 1, mm and about 8 mm, and preferably between about 2 mm and about 7 mm, more preferably between about 2.5 mm and about 4 mm, and most preferably between about 3 mm and about 4 mm.


In addition, the body 12 of a club head 10 in the present invention may be formed of a metallic material, a non-metallic material or a combination of materials, such as a steel skirt and sole with a composite crown, for example. Also, one or more weights may be located in or on the body 12, as desired, to achieve final performance characteristics for the club head 10.

Claims
  • 1. A golf club head, comprising: a body having a top portion, a sole portion, the body defining a transition edge and a front opening;a face insert comprising prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight less than 100 g/m2, the face insert attached at and closing the front opening of the body;a metallic cap attached to the prepreg plies wherein the prepreg plies are configured to reinforce a majority of a metallic cap striking surface, the metallic cap abutting the transition edge to form a substantially flush golf club head front surface;wherein the thickness of the prepreg plies is about 4.5 mm or less, and the thickness of the metallic cap is about 0.5 mm or less, and wherein the golf club head has a coefficient of restitution of at least 0.79, and wherein the metallic cap is formed of a material with a density less than 5 g/cc, the cap covering a front surface of the prepreg plies and comprising a peripheral rim.
  • 2. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the thickness of the prepreg plies is non-constant.
  • 3. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the thickness of the face insert is less than 3.5 mm.
  • 4. The golf club head of claim 1, the face insert having a front surface and a side edge, the cap extending across at least a portion of the front surface.
  • 5. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the body is comprised of at least one material selected from the group consisting of a titanium alloy, a steel alloy, and a composite material.
  • 6. A golf club head, comprising: a body having a top portion, a sole portion, the body defining a transition edge and a front opening; anda face insert having at least a portion comprising prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight, the face insert closing the front opening of the body;a metallic cap attached to the prepreg plies wherein the prepreg plies are configured to reinforce a majority of a metallic cap striking surface, the metallic cap abutting the transition edge to form a substantially flush golf club head front surface;wherein the face insert's total thickness is within a range of about 1 mm to about 8 mm, the golf club head having a coefficient of restitution of at least 0.79, and wherein the metallic cap is adhesively attached to the prepreg plies;wherein the total thickness of the prepreg plies is non-constant across the face insert; andwherein the prepreg plies have a fiber areal weight of less than 100 g/m2.
  • 7. A golf club head as defined in claim 6, wherein: the prepreg plies include carbon fiber reinforcement having a fiber areal weight of about 70 g/m2; andthe face insert's total thickness is within a range of about 2.5 mm to about 4.5 mm.
  • 8. A golf club head as defined in claim 6, wherein the body is at least partly formed of a metallic material and the mass of the face insert is at least 10 grams less than an equivalent volume of the metallic material of the body.
  • 9. A golf club head, comprising: a body having a top portion, a sole portion, the body defining a transition edge and a front opening;a face insert comprising prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight less than 100 g/m2, the face insert attached at and closing the front opening of the body;a metallic cap attached to the prepreg plies wherein the prepreg plies are configured to reinforce a majority of a metallic cap striking surface, the metallic cap abutting the transition edge to form a substantially flush golf club head front surface;wherein the thickness of the prepreg plies is about 4.5 mm or less, and the thickness of the metallic cap is about 0.5 mm or less, and wherein the golf club head has a coefficient of restitution of at least 0.79, the face insert having a front surface and a side edge, the cap covering at least a portion of the side edge.
  • 10. A golf club head, comprising: a body having a top portion and a sole portion, the body defining a transition edge and a cavity having a front opening;a face insert comprising prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight, the face insert attached at and closing the front opening of the body;a metallic cap attached to the prepreg plies wherein the prepreg plies are configured to reinforce a majority of a metallic cap striking surface, the metallic cap abutting the transition edge to form a substantially flush golf club head front surface;wherein the thickness of the prepreg plies is about 4.5 mm or less, and the thickness of the metallic cap is about 0.5 mm or less, and wherein the golf club head has a coefficient of restitution of at least 0.79, wherein the body comprises an annular ledge extending around a periphery of the front opening, and wherein the face insert is coupled to the annular ledge;the prepreg plies having a front surface, a rear surface and a peripheral side surface;the cap covering the front surface of the prepreg plies and having an annular rim extending around the peripheral side surface of the prepreg plies, the rim having a rear surface that is flush with the rear surface of the prepreg plies; andthe annular ledge having a front surface and a rear surface, wherein the rear surface of the annular ledge forms a front boundary of the cavity, and wherein the rear surface of the rim and a peripheral portion of the rear surface of the prepreg plies is adhesively attached to the front surface of the annular ledge.
  • 11. A golf club head, comprising: a body having a top portion, a sole portion, the body defining a front opening;a face insert comprising prepreg plies having a resin content of about 40% and a fiber areal weight less than 100 g/m2, the face insert attached at and closing the front opening of the body;wherein the thickness of the prepreg plies is about 4.5 mm or less and the prepreg plies are configured to reinforce a majority of a cap striking surface, and wherein the golf club head has a coefficient of restitution of at least 0.79, wherein the body comprises an annular ledge extending around a periphery of the front opening, and wherein the face insert is coupled to the annular ledge.
  • 12. A golf club head of claim 11, wherein the body is at least partly formed of a metallic material and the mass of the face insert is at least 10 grams less than an equivalent volume of the metallic material of the body.
  • 13. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the thickness of the prepreg plies is non-constant.
  • 14. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the body is comprised of at least one material selected from the group consisting of a titanium alloy, a steel alloy, and a composite material.
  • 15. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the prepreg plies comprise a plurality of stacked groups of plies, wherein each group of plies is arranged at a different orientation with respect to an adjacent group of plies.
  • 16. The golf club head of claim 15, wherein the orientation of each of the groups of plies comprises one of 0 degrees, +45 degrees, 90 degrees and −45 degrees with respect to the horizontal axis of the club head front opening.
  • 17. A golf club head, comprising: a body having a top portion, a sole portion, the body defining a front opening;a face insert comprising a plurality of stacked groups of 10 or more prepreg plies having a fiber areal weight less than 100 g/m2 and the prepreg plies are configured to reinforce a majority of a cap striking surface, wherein each group of plies is arranged at a different orientation with respect to an adjacent group of plies, the face insert attached at and closing the front opening of the body;wherein the thickness of the prepreg plies is about 4.5 mm or less, and wherein the golf club head has a coefficient of restitution of at least 0.79, wherein the body comprises an annular ledge extending around a periphery of the front opening, and wherein the face insert is coupled to the annular ledge.
  • 18. The golf club head of claim 17, wherein the orientation of each of the groups of plies comprises one of 0 degrees, +45 degrees, 90 degrees and −45 degrees with respect to the horizontal axis of the club head front opening.
  • 19. A golf club head, comprising: a body having a top portion, a sole portion, the body defining a front opening;a face insert comprising prepreg plies having a resin content of about 40%, the face insert attached at and closing the front opening of the body;wherein the thickness of the prepreg plies is about 4.5 mm or less and the prepreg plies are configured to reinforce a majority of a cap striking surface, and wherein the golf club head has a coefficient of restitution of at least 0.79, wherein the cap is comprised of an injection-molded plastic.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/895,195, filed Aug. 21, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,628,712 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/442,348, filed May 21, 2003 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,267,620), which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (117)
Number Name Date Kind
1133129 Govan Mar 1915 A
3567228 Lynn Mar 1971 A
3695618 Woolley et al. Oct 1972 A
3836153 Dance, Jr. Sep 1974 A
3937474 Jepson et al. Feb 1976 A
4398965 Campau Aug 1983 A
4523759 Igarashi Jun 1985 A
4539253 Hirschbuehler et al. Sep 1985 A
4545580 Tomita et al. Oct 1985 A
4618149 Maxel Oct 1986 A
4740345 Nagasaki et al. Apr 1988 A
4792139 Nagasaki et al. Dec 1988 A
4793616 Fernandez Dec 1988 A
4798383 Nagasaki et al. Jan 1989 A
4804188 McKee et al. Feb 1989 A
4809978 Yamaguchi et al. Mar 1989 A
4848747 Fujimura et al. Jul 1989 A
4884812 Nagasaki et al. Dec 1989 A
4928972 Nakanishi et al. May 1990 A
4964640 Nakanishi et al. Oct 1990 A
4995609 Parente et al. Feb 1991 A
5007643 Okumoto et al. Apr 1991 A
5016882 Fujimura et al. May 1991 A
5078397 Aizawa Jan 1992 A
5106094 Desbiolles et al. Apr 1992 A
5135227 Okumoto et al. Aug 1992 A
5176384 Sata et al. Jan 1993 A
5261664 Anderson Nov 1993 A
5271621 Lo Dec 1993 A
5277423 Artus Jan 1994 A
5310185 Viollaz et al. May 1994 A
5312106 Cook May 1994 A
5344140 Anderson Sep 1994 A
5346216 Aizawa Sep 1994 A
5348302 Sasamoto et al. Sep 1994 A
5377986 Viollaz et al. Jan 1995 A
5417419 Anderson et al. May 1995 A
5425538 Vincent et al. Jun 1995 A
5433440 Lin Jul 1995 A
5465969 Cadorniga Nov 1995 A
5472201 Aizawa et al. Dec 1995 A
5480153 Igarashi Jan 1996 A
5494281 Chen Feb 1996 A
5499819 Nagamoto Mar 1996 A
5505453 Mack Apr 1996 A
5518242 Mahaffey et al. May 1996 A
5529543 Beaumont, Sr. Jun 1996 A
5672120 Ramirez et al. Sep 1997 A
5697855 Aizawa Dec 1997 A
5720673 Anderson Feb 1998 A
5743813 Chen et al. Apr 1998 A
5774970 Huang Jul 1998 A
5827131 Mahaffey et al. Oct 1998 A
5830084 Kosmatka Nov 1998 A
5906550 Kingston May 1999 A
5967903 Cheng Oct 1999 A
5985197 Nelson et al. Nov 1999 A
5993329 Shieh Nov 1999 A
6050904 Kuo Apr 2000 A
6071200 Song Jun 2000 A
6162133 Peterson Dec 2000 A
6165081 Chou Dec 2000 A
6193614 Sasamoto et al. Feb 2001 B1
6248024 Nelson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248025 Murphy et al. Jun 2001 B1
6299547 Kosmatka Oct 2001 B1
6338683 Kosmatka Jan 2002 B1
6354962 Galloway et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364789 Kosmatka Apr 2002 B1
6368234 Galloway Apr 2002 B1
6390932 Kosmatka et al. May 2002 B1
6406378 Murphy et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406381 Murphy et al. Jun 2002 B2
6435980 Reyes et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440008 Murphy et al. Aug 2002 B2
6440011 Hocknell et al. Aug 2002 B1
6582323 Soracco et al. Jun 2003 B2
6607451 Kosmatka et al. Aug 2003 B2
6648774 Lee Nov 2003 B1
6669576 Rice Dec 2003 B1
6669577 Hocknell et al. Dec 2003 B1
6743117 Gilbert Jun 2004 B2
6835144 Best Dec 2004 B2
6918840 Stites et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921343 Solheim Jul 2005 B2
6921344 Gilbert et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923732 Stites et al. Aug 2005 B2
6991559 Yabu Jan 2006 B2
7004852 Billings Feb 2006 B2
7140974 Chao et al. Nov 2006 B2
7147571 Best et al. Dec 2006 B2
7189165 Yamamoto Mar 2007 B2
7207899 Imamoto Apr 2007 B2
7232377 Gilbert et al. Jun 2007 B2
7267620 Chao et al. Sep 2007 B2
7300361 Stites et al. Nov 2007 B2
7303486 Imamoto Dec 2007 B2
7316623 Imamoto Jan 2008 B2
7357730 Shieh Apr 2008 B2
7476162 Stites et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481719 Imamoto Jan 2009 B2
7628712 Chao et al. Dec 2009 B2
20010055995 Cackett et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020065146 Kusumoto May 2002 A1
20020169034 Hocknell et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030036442 Chao et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030139227 Sugimoto Jul 2003 A1
20050026718 Chen Feb 2005 A1
20050075191 Bennett Apr 2005 A1
20070049417 Shear Mar 2007 A1
20070129162 Pan et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070129166 Shimazaki et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070293349 Chao et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080004134 Roach et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080032813 Hagood et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080032815 Yamamoto Feb 2008 A1
20080058117 Roach Mar 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (30)
Number Date Country
1 201 648 Aug 1970 GB
2 338 903 Jan 2000 GB
60-15145 Jan 1985 JP
01-171583 Jul 1989 JP
4109973 Apr 1992 JP
05-007261 Feb 1993 JP
U-H05-068564 Sep 1993 JP
6-23071 Feb 1994 JP
6079023 Mar 1994 JP
6503490 Apr 1994 JP
06-165842 Jun 1994 JP
6-205858 Jul 1994 JP
07-001958 Jan 1995 JP
9117537 May 1997 JP
09-176347 Jul 1997 JP
09-299519 Nov 1997 JP
10-155943 Jun 1998 JP
11-137734 May 1999 JP
11-347155 Dec 1999 JP
2001-293112 Oct 2001 JP
2001316971 Nov 2001 JP
2002315854 Oct 2002 JP
2002-331051 Nov 2002 JP
2003-024483 Jan 2003 JP
2003-144590 May 2003 JP
2003138041 May 2003 JP
T-2003-518993 Jun 2003 JP
2005-218510 Aug 2005 JP
2006-167033 Jun 2006 JP
WO2006017605 Feb 2006 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100048323 A1 Feb 2010 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11895195 Aug 2007 US
Child 12589486 US
Parent 10442348 May 2003 US
Child 11895195 US