The present disclosure relates to a golf club, and more specifically to a hybrid golf club.
Golf clubs take various forms, for example a wood, a hybrid, an iron, a wedge, or a putter. These clubs generally differ in head shape and design (e.g., the difference between a wood and an iron, etc.), club head material(s), shaft material(s), club length, and club loft.
With hybrid golf clubs, the club is designed as a replacement to lower lofted irons. The hybrid integrates launch and forgiveness characteristics of a fairway wood with a control and a distance of an iron. While these characteristics are helpful for a higher handicap golfer, who often needs forgiveness and assistance launching a shot into the air to maximize distance, these design characteristics can result in performance issues for lower handicap, better golfers. More specifically, the design attributes that assist a higher handicap golfer to improve forgiveness and shot trajectory can result in an undesirable aesthetic at address for a lower handicap golfer. Notably, the hybrid can have an appearance at address of a closed, or shut clubface. This address position is undesirable for a lower handicap golfer, who often prefers a neutral to slightly open address position.
The lower handicap golfer will often attempt to compensate for this undesired closed clubface position at address by rotating the club shaft to rotate the club head open. While this results in opening the hybrid club head at address (or a fade bias), it also raises the leading edge of the hybrid club head off the ground, as the sole of the hybrid contacts the ground at a position closer to the rear of the club (or further away from a face). This also undesirably adds loft to the hybrid. The combination of the raised leading edge and added loft with the open clubface provides a visual impression to a lower handicap golfer that a shot struck by the hybrid will not travel at the target, but instead will travel substantially offline. Generally, the lower handicap golfer perceives that the shot struck by the hybrid will travel to the player's side (i.e., the ball will travel left of target line for a right handed player or right of target for a left handed player of an intended target line (i.e., a pull or a hook).
Therefore, there is a need in the art for hybrids that appease low handicap players, such that they play to the low handicap players preferences and aesthetics, while providing improved launch and forgiveness.
The present invention relates to a golf club that incorporates an improved resting face angle and center of gravity position to reduce a hook-bias, as well as a set up visual aesthetic that is preferred by a lower handicap golfer. The golf club head comprises a hosel axis defined by the hosel and oriented relative to a plane perpendicular to a surface upon which the sole rests at address to define a hosel tilt, wherein the hosel tilt is greater than zero degrees. The club body defines a resting face angle that is open relative to an intended target line. Low handicap players require the above described features to have confidence in the shot they can execute. Some, low handicap players are unable to hit low lofted iron type clubs such as a 3 iron or 4 iron due to how they deliver the club head at impact and therefore need a hybrid type club to obtain the preferred launch and spin characteristics. The low handicap players that require a hybrid type club over a low lofted iron, however, do not need the left bias that a traditional hybrid type club provides. The traditional hybrid type clubs provide a left bias for a high handicap player, as it is understood that higher handicap players typically struggle to obtain a ball flight that goes left of target line. Accordingly, the present invention provides a low handicap player with a balance between the launch and spin characteristics that a hybrid type golf club provides along with a club head that does not have a left bias and therefore the low handicap player can execute the shot they deem desirable.
The terms “loft” or “loft angle” of a golf club, as described herein, refers to the angle formed between the club face and the shaft, as measured by any suitable loft and lie machine.
The term “face angle” of a golf club, as described herein, refers to the angle formed between the club face and the intended target line, and more specifically between the club face and an imaginary line that extends from the golf club head through a golf ball along a player's intended target line. The terms “face angle at address” or “resting face angle” of a golf club, as described herein, refers to the angle formed between the club face and the players intended target line at address (i.e., prior to the swing), and more specifically between the club face and an imaginary line that extends from the golf club head through the golf ball along a player's intended target line at address. It should be appreciated that the face angle is in a neutral position when the club face is square (or generally perpendicular) to the intended target line. The face angle is in an open position when the club head rotates about the shaft such that the toe end moves away from the ball. The face angle is in a closed position when the club head rotates about the shaft such that the toe end moves towards the golf ball.
The terms “first,” “second,” “third,” “fourth,” “fifth,” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments described herein are, for example, capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or otherwise described herein. Furthermore, the terms “include,” and “have,” and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, device, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to those elements, but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, system, article, device, or apparatus.
The terms “left,” “right,” “front,” “back,” “top,” “bottom,” “over,” “under,” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for descriptive purposes and not necessarily for describing permanent relative positions. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the apparatus, methods, and/or articles of manufacture described herein are, for example, capable of operation in other orientations than those illustrated or otherwise described herein.
The terms “couple,” “coupled,” “couples,” “coupling,” and the like should be broadly understood and refer to connecting two or more elements, mechanically or otherwise, either directly or indirectly. Coupling (whether mechanical or otherwise) may be for any length of time, e.g., permanent or semi-permanent or only for an instant.
The terms “loft” or “loft angle” of a golf club, as described herein, refers to an angle formed between a club face and a shaft, as measured by any suitable loft and lie machine.
The term “driving iron” and the like, as described herein, refers to an iron shaped golf club with a low loft, typically in the range of 15-21 degrees. A driving iron is typically a hollow body iron.
Other features and aspects will become apparent by consideration of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. Before any embodiments of the disclosure are explained in detail, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details or construction and the arrangement of components as set forth in the following description or as illustrated in the drawings. The disclosure is capable of supporting other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. It should be understood that the description of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the disclosure from covering all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
For ease of discussion and understanding, and for purposes of description only, the following detailed description illustrates a golf club head 100 as a hybrid (or a hybrid-type club head). It should be appreciated that the hybrid is provided for purposes of illustration, and one or more of the attributes disclosed herein are not limited to a hybrid. The attributes can be used on any desired golf club, including a driver, a wood, a hybrid, an iron, or other golf club where a resting face angle, hosel tilt, center of gravity (CG), or other attributes to provide an improved performance and aesthetic for a player is desired. For example, the club head 100 can include, but is not limited to, a driver, a fairway wood, a hybrid, a one-iron, a two-iron, a three-iron, a four-iron, a five-iron, a six-iron, a seven-iron, an eight-iron, a nine-iron, a pitching wedge, a gap wedge, a utility wedge, a sand wedge, a lob wedge, and/or a putter. In addition, the golf club head 100 can have a loft that can range from approximately 3 degrees to approximately 65 degrees (including, but not limited to, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 10.5, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 15.5, 16, 16.5, 17, 17.5, 18, 18.5, 19, 19.5, 20, 20.5, 21, 21.5, 22, 22.5, 23, 23.5, 24, 24.5, 25, 25.5, 26, 26.5, 27, 27.5, 28, 28.5, 29, 29.5, 30, 30.5, 31, 31.5, 32, 32.5 ,33, 33.5, 34, 34.5, 35, 35.5, 36, 36.5, 37, 37.5, 38, 38.5, 39, 39.5, 40, 40.5, 41, 41.5, 42, 42.5, 43, 43.5, 44, 44.5, 45, 45.5, 46, 46.5, 47, 47.5, 48, 48.5, 49, 49.5, 50, 51, 51.5, 52, 52.5, 53, 53.5, 54, 54.5, 55, 55.5, 56, 56.5, 57, 57.5, 58, 58.5, 59, 59.5, 60.5, 61. 61.5, 62, 62.5, 63, 63.5, 64, 64.5, and/or 65 degrees).
In one example of an embodiment, the loft angle of a hybrid-type club head 100 can be less than approximately 40 degrees, less than approximately 39 degrees, less than approximately 38 degrees, less than approximately 37 degrees, less than approximately 36 degrees, less than approximately 35 degrees, less than approximately 34 degrees, less than approximately 33 degrees, less than approximately 32 degrees, less than approximately 31 degrees, or less than approximately 30 degrees. Further, in other examples of embodiments, the loft angle of the hybrid-type club head 100 can be greater than approximately 14 degrees, greater than approximately 15 degrees, greater than approximately 16 degrees, greater than approximately 17 degrees, greater than approximately 18 degrees, greater than approximately 19 degrees, greater than approximately 20 degrees, greater than approximately 21 degrees, greater than approximately 22 degrees, greater than approximately 23 degrees, greater than approximately 24 degrees, or greater than approximately 25 degrees.
The volume of a hybrid-type club head 100 can be less than approximately 200 cubic centimeters (cc), less than approximately 175 cc, less than approximately 150 cc, less than approximately 125 cc, less than approximately 100 cc, or less than approximately 75 cc. In other examples of embodiments, the volume of the hybrid-type club head 100 can be approximately 110 cc to approximately 150 cc, and more specifically approximately 100 cc to approximately 140 cc, and more specifically approximately 90 cc to approximately 130 cc, and more specifically approximately 108 cc to approximately 110 cc. In yet other examples of embodiments, the volume of the hybrid-type club head 100 can be approximately 75 cc to approximately 150 cc, approximately 100 cc to approximately 125 cc, or approximately 75 cc to approximately 125 cc.
Referring now to the figures,
The golf club head 100 also includes a hosel 148 positioned at the heel 112. The hosel 148 defines a hosel axis 150 that extends through a center of the hosel 148. The hosel 148 is configured to receive a golf club shaft (not shown) that carries a grip (not shown). With specific reference to
This hosel tilt, or negative hosel tilt relative to the plane 152, is preferred by lower handicap players, as it allows the player to position their hands behind the ball (or towards a trail or rear foot of the player) at the address position. This is a preferred hand position for lower handicap players with woods, hybrids, and long irons, as these players generally position the ball forward of middle in their stance, but their hands remain at (or near) the middle of their stance. Thus, the hands are generally positioned behind the ball at the address position. It should be appreciated that hybrid golf clubs currently on the market generally have a hosel axis 150 that is parallel to the plane 152, or a positive hosel tilt. With a positive hosel tilt, the hosel axis 150 is angled towards the plane 152 such that the hosel axis 150 intersects the plane 152 at an imaginary position above the ground surface. When the club is at the address position the sole 120 (or a portion of the sole 120) contacts the ground. It should be appreciated that at the address position, the club body 104 is in contact with the ground. How the sole 120 (or a portion of the sole 120) contacts the ground contributes to a resting face angle (RFA) of the club head 100.
The club head 100 RFA provides a visually pleasing aesthetic preferred by a lower handicap golfer. The term “resting face angle” of the golf club head 100 refers to an angle formed between the club face 124 and a plane that is perpendicular to the players intended target line 180. With reference to
It should be appreciated that if the resting face angle is in a neutral position, the club face 124 (and the associated orientation plane 182) is square to the intended target line 180. Stated another way the orientation plane of the club face 124 (and the associated orientation plane 182) is perpendicular to the intended target line 180. It should be appreciated that if the resting face angle is in an open position, the club body 104 rotates relative to the shaft (or around the hosel axis 150) such that the toe 108 moves away from the ball (or moves away from the intended target line 180). It should be appreciated that if the resting face angle is in a closed position, the club body 104 rotates relative to the shaft (or around the hosel axis 150) such that the toe 108 moves towards the ball (or moves towards the intended target line 180).
As illustrated in
If the resting face angle is measured from the intended target line 180 to the club face 124 (or to the orientation plane 182 parallel to the club face 124), the resting face angle is at least 90.5 degrees, and more specifically approximately 90.5 degrees to approximately 92.0 degrees, with 90 degrees being square to the intended target line 180. The resting face angle can be 90.5 degrees, 91.0 degrees, 91.5 degrees, or 92.0 degrees. The resting face angle can be between 90.5 degrees and 91.5 degrees, or 91.5 degrees and 92.0 degrees. The resting face angle can be greater than 90.5 degrees, greater than 91.0 degrees, greater than 91.5 degrees.
The RFA of the golf club head 100 can be dictated by a relationship between the location on the sole 120 at which the club naturally rests on the ground surface at address, commonly referred to as the keel point, and the center of gravity 154 of the club. In some embodiments of the golf club head, only one keel point exists. In such embodiments, the keel point will generally align with the CG of the golf club head, allowing an imaginary axis perpendicular to the ground to pass through both the keel point and the center of gravity 154 of the club.
In other examples of embodiments, such as the golf club head 100, two keel points exist. In such embodiments, a first keel point 184 is located on a first side of the sole 120 relative to the center of gravity 154, and a second keel point 186 is located on a second side of the sole 120 relative to the center of gravity 154. The first and second sides can be separated by the x-axis 155, which extends from the toe 108 to the heel 112 and through the center of gravity 154. Stated another way, the first side is a portion of the sole 120 position on a first side of the x-axis 155, and the second side is a portion of the sole 120 positions on a second, opposite side of the x-axis 155.
With reference to
To maintain a slightly open resting face angle, while incorporating the stability provided by a two-keel point sole, the first keel point 184 can have a slightly greater keel point height than the second keel point 186. Keel point height is referred to as a distance by which the keel point projects outward, away from the sole 120, towards the ground. The keel point height can be measured from a center of gravity (CG) of the club head. The greater the keel point height of the keel point, the more protruded the keel point is from the remainder of the sole 120. In embodiments having a two-keel point sole, increasing the keel point height of the first keel point 184, while maintaining the height of the second keel point 186 results in a more open resting face angle. Similarly, decreasing the height of the second keel point 186, while maintaining height of the first keel point 184 results in a more open resting face angle. Conversely, increasing the keel point height of the second keel point 186, while maintaining the height of the first keel point 184, or decreasing the height of the first keel point 184 while maintaining the height of the second keel point 186 results in a more closed resting face angle.
In the illustrated embodiment of the golf club head 100, the first keel point 184 generally has a keel point height that is greater than the second keel point 186 to facilitate the slightly open resting face angle that provides a visually pleasing aesthetic preferred by a lower handicap golfer.
The first keel point 184 comprises a first keel point height measured along the Y-Axis from the CG between 0.455 in and 0.465 in. In some examples, the first keel point height can be 0.455 in, 0.456 in, 0.457 in, 0.458 in, 0.459 in, 0.460 in, 0.461 in, 0.462 in, 0.463 in, 0.464 in, or 0.465 in. The first keel point height can be greater than 0.455 in, greater than 0.456 in, greater than 0.457 in, greater than 0.458 in, greater than 0.459 in, greater than 0.460 in, greater than 0.461 in, greater than 0.462 in, greater than 0.463 in, or greater than 0.464 in. The first keel point height can be less than 0.465, less than 0.464 in, less than 0.463 in, less than 0.462 in, less than 0.461 in, less than 0.460 in, less than 0.459 in, less than 0.458 in, less than 0.457 in, or less than 0.456 in.
The second keel point 186 comprises a second keel point height measured along the Y-Axis from the CG between 0.445-0.455. In some examples, the second keel point height can be 0.445 in, 0.446 in, 0.447 in, 0.448 in, 0.449 in, 0.450 in, 0.451 in, 0.452 in, 0.453 in, 0.454 in, or 0.455 in. The second keel point height can be greater than 0.445 in, greater than 0.446 in, greater than 0.447 in, greater than 0.448 in, greater than 0.449 in, greater than 0.450 in, greater than 0.451 in, greater than 0.452 in, greater than 0.453 in, greater than 0.454 in. The second keel point height can be less than 0.455 in, 0.454 in, less than 0.453 in, less than 0.452 in, less than 0.451 in, less than 0.450 in, less than 0.449 in, less than 0.448 in, less than 0.447 in, or less than 0.446 in. The first keel point height and the second keel point height can have a difference in height of 0.001 in-0.01 in. The difference in height can be 0.001 in, 0.005 in, 0.01 in.
With reference to
The club body 304 comprises similar features to the club body 104 discussed herein. The club body 304 comprises a toe 308, a heel 312, a back end 332, a hosel 348, a center of gravity 354, an x-axis 355, a weight recess 378, and other features similar to club body 104 not shown in
The first keel point 384 comprises a first keel point height measured along the Y-Axis from the CG between 0.450 in and 0.465 in. In some examples, the first keel point height can be 0.450 in, 0.451 in, 0.452 in, 0.453 in, 0.454 in, 0.455 in, 0.456 in, 0.457 in, 0.458 in, 0.459 in, 0.460 in, 0.461 in, 0.462 in, 0.463 in, 0.464 in, or 0.465 in. The first keel point height can be greater than 0.450 in, greater than 0.451 in, greater than 0.452 in, greater than 0.453 in, greater than 0.454 in, greater than 0.455 in, greater than 0.456 in, greater than 0.457 in, greater than 0.458 in, greater than 0.459 in, greater than 0.460 in, greater than 0.461 in, greater than 0.462 in, greater than 0.463 in, or greater than 0.464 in. The first keel point height can be less than 0.465 in, less than 0.464 in, less than 0.463 in, less than 0.462 in, less than 0.461 in, less than 0.460 in, less than 0.459 in, less than 0.458 in, less than 0.457 in, less than 0.456 in, less than 0.455 in, less than 0.454 in, less than 0.453 in, less than 0.452 in, less than 0.451 in.
The second keel point 386 comprises a second keel point height measured along the Y-Axis from the CG between 0.325-0.40. In some examples, the second keel point height can be 0.325 in, 0.330 in, 0.335 in, 0.340 in, 0.345 in, 0.350 in, 0.355 in, 0.360 in, 0.365 in, 0.370 in, 0.375 in, 0.380 in, 0.385 in, 0.390 in, 0.395 in, or 0.400 in. The second keel point height can be greater than 0.325 in, 0.335 in, 0.345 in, 0.355 in, 0.365 in, 0.375 in, 0.385 in, or 0.395 in. The second keel point height can be less than 0.400 in, 0.390 in, 0.380 in, 0.370 in, 0.360 in, 0.350 in, 0.340 in, or 0.330 in. The first keel point height and the second keel point height can have a difference in height of 0.05 in-0.140 in. The difference in height can be 0.05 in, 0.06 in, 0.07 in, 0.08 in, 0.09 in, 0.10 in, 0.11 in, 0.12 in, 0.13 in, or 0.14 in.
With reference specifically to
With reference to
For additional guidance in describing the present invention herein, the x-axis 155 and the z-axis 157 are arranged to coincide with numbers on an analog clock in
The center of gravity can be measured along the x-axis 155 and is represented by CGx. The center of gravity can also be measured along the y-axis 156 and is represented by CGy. The center of gravity can be measured along the z-axis 157 and is represented by CGz. Moving the center of gravity towards the toe 108 or the heel 112 can be achieved by increasing or decreasing the distance along the x-axis 155. Lowering the center of gravity can be achieved by decreasing the distance along the y-axis 156. Moving the center of gravity rearward can be achieved by increasing the distance along the z-axis 157. In a preferred embodiment, the center of gravity location can be measured from the geometric center 153. In other examples of embodiments, the center of gravity location can be measured from the leading edge 136 of the golf club head 100 (or from a furthest forward position of the golf club head 100).
In the illustrated embodiment, the hybrid golf club head 100 comprises a center of gravity located along the x-axis 155 at an approximate center of the strike surface 128. In other examples the center of gravity can be positioned at least 0.001 inch towards the toe 108 of the strike surface 128, and more specifically approximately 0.001 inch to approximately 0.25 inch towards the toe 108 of the strike surface 128 (as measured from the geometric center 153). The CG can be 0.001 inch to 0.01 inch towards the toe, 0.01-0.05 0.05 inch towards the toe, 0.05-0.1 inch towards the toe, 0.1-0.15 inch towards the toe, This center of gravity position is intended to not promote a hook bias.
The hybrid golf club head 100 also has a center of gravity located along the x-axis 155 (of CGx) of approximately 0.001 inch to approximately 0.500 inch, as measured from the geometric center 153. The hybrid golf club head 100 also has a center of gravity located along the y-axis 156 (of CGy) of approximately 0.200 inch to approximately 0.500 inch, as measured from the geometric center 153. The hybrid golf club head 100 also has a center of gravity located along the z-axis 157 (of CGz) of approximately 0.100 inch to approximately 0.300 inch, as measured from the geometric center 153. In the illustrated embodiment the CGx is 0.008 inch, the CGy is 0.294 inch and the CGz is inch when measured from the geometric center 153.
The hybrid golf club head 100 also has a center of gravity located along the y-axis 156 (of CGy) of approximately 0.300 inch to approximately 0.500 inch, as measured from the leading edge 136 (or the most forward point on the golf club head 100). The hybrid golf club head 100 has a center of gravity located along the z-axis 157 (of CGz) of approximately 0.700 inch to approximately 1.100 inch, as measured from the leading edge 136 (or the most forward point on the golf club head 100).
In addition to the above-described features, the golf club head 100 can further comprise other attributes such as a hosel adapter, various removable weight configurations, a face cup insert, and a second component that can comprise the crown of the club head or a portion of the club head.
With specific reference to
In the illustrated embodiment of the hybrid golf club head 100, the loft plane 158 is positioned approximately 0.100 inches to approximately 0.650 inches from the center of gravity 154. In some embodiments, the loft plane 158 is positioned 0.100 in to 0.150 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.150 in to 0.200 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.200 in to 0.250 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.250 in to 0.300 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.300 in to 0.350 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.350 in to 0.400 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.400 in to 0.450 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.450 in to 0.500 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.500 in to 0.550 in from the center of gravity 154, 0.550 in to 0.600 in from the center of gravity 154, or 0.600 in to 0.650 in from the center of gravity 154.
With continued reference to
With reference to
The hosel adapter 164 defines an adapter axis 172 (or a sleeve axis 172) that extends along a centerline of the hosel adapter 164. In response to a circumferential position of the hosel adapter 164 relative to the hosel adapter attachment recess 160, the adapter axis 172 can be either aligned with the hosel axis 150 or angled relative to the hosel axis 150. Stated another way, hosel adapter 164 can disengage from the hosel adapter attachment recess 160, the hosel adapter 164 can rotate relative to the hosel adapter attachment recess 160 around the hosel axis 150, and then the hosel adapter 164 can reengage with the hosel adapter attachment recess 160, fastening to the club body 104 by the fastener 168. In response to the rotational position of the hosel adapter 164 relative to the hosel adapter attachment recess 160, the hosel adapter 164 and associated golf club shaft can be angled between 0.4 degrees to 2.5 degrees relative to the hosel axis 150. In some embodiments, the adapter axis 172 can be angled between 0.4 to 1.5 degrees or 1.5 to 2.5 degrees relative to the hosel axis 150. For example, the adapter axis 172 can be angled 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.22, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, or 2.5 degrees relative to hosel axis 150. This facilitates adjustability of the hosel tilt for a user. An example of an embodiment of the hosel adapter attachment recess 160 and associated hosel adapter 164 is further disclosed in U.S. Published Application No. 2020/0360771, the contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
With reference to
In the illustrated embodiment, the golf club head 100 can have a moment of inertia Ixx about the x-axis 155 (also referred to as a crown-to-sole moment of inertia), and a moment of inertia Iyy about the y-axis 156 (also referred to as a heel-to-toe moment of inertia). In some examples of embodiments, the crown-to-sole moment of inertia Ixx and the heel-to-toe moment of inertia Iyy are increased or maximized based on the amount of discretionary mass available to the club head designer. The golf club head 100 can have a crown-to-sole moment of inertia Ixx of approximately 675 g·in2 to approximately 700 g·in2, and more specifically approximately 677 g·in2 to approximately 697 g·in2. The golf club head 100 can have a heel-to-toe moment of inertia Iyy of approximately 2150 g·in2 approximately 2225 g·in2, and more specifically approximately 2174 g·in2 to approximately 2200 g·in2.
The removable weight 176 can define a through hole that is configured to receive a threaded fastener 181. The weight recess 178 can define a corresponding threaded bore (not shown) configured to receive the threaded fastener 181 to removably fasten the removable weight 176 to the weight recess 178, and in turn to the golf club head 100. The weight recess 178 can be recessed from an outer surface of the sole 120 (as shown in
The removable weight 176 can be formed of a material such as steel, tungsten, aluminum, titanium, vanadium, chromium, cobalt, nickel, other metals, metal alloys, composite polymer materials or any combination thereof. In many embodiments, the removable weight 176 can be tungsten.
The removable weight 176 can define a mass. The mass of the removable weight 176 can range from approximately 1.0 gram to approximately 35 grams. In some examples of embodiments, the mass of the removable weight 176 can range from 1.0 gram to 20 grams, or from 20 grams to 35 grams. In some examples of embodiments, the mass of the removable weight 176 can range from 1.0 gram to 15 grams, from 5 grams to 20 grams, from 10 grams to 25 grams, from 15 grams to 30 grams, or from 20 grams to 35 grams. For example, the mass of the removable weight 176 can be 1.0 gram, 1.5 grams, 2.0 grams, 3.0 grams, 4.0 grams, 5.0 grams, 6.0 grams, 7.0 grams, 8.0 grams, 9.0 grams, 10 grams, 11 grams, 12 grams, 13 grams, 14 grams, 15 grams, 16 grams, 17 grams, 18 grams, 19 grams, 20 grams, 21 grams, 22 grams, 23, grams, 24, grams, 25 grams, 26 grams, 27 grams, 28 grams, 29, grams, 30 grams, 31 grams, 32 grams, 33 grams, 34 grams, or 35 grams. In one example, the mass of the removable weight 176 can be 10 grams. In another example, the mass of the removable weight 176 can be 13 grams. In other examples of embodiments, the mass of the removable weight 176 can be any suitable or desired number of grams.
With reference now to
As illustrated in
With reference to
The face cup crown edge 228 defines a peripheral edge of the face cup crown return 221. The face cup sole edge 232 defines a peripheral edge of the face cup sole return 224. The face cup crown edge 228 is configured to be positioned adjacent an upper edge of the lip 210 of the club head body 104 (shown in
With reference back to
The golf club heads 100, 200, and golf club head body 304 disclosed herein provide certain advantages. For example, the hybrid golf club heads 100, 200, and golf club head body 304 have a slightly open resting face angle to provide a visual aesthetic at setup that is preferred by a lower handicap golfer. The hybrid golf club heads 100, 200, and golf club head body 304 also incorporate a smaller volume of approximately 90 cc to approximately 130 cc, and more specifically approximately 108 cc to approximately 110 cc. The smaller size provides a more compact club shape that is preferred by a lower handicap golfer. In addition, the hosel 148 incorporates a negative hosel tilt, which is preferred by lower handicap players, as it allows the player to position their hands behind the ball (or towards a trail or rear foot of the player) at the address position. These and other advantages are realized by the disclosure herein.
In a performance test, a first exemplary golf club head was compared to a first control golf club head, and a second control golf club head. The first exemplary golf club comprised a hybrid type golf club which further comprised an open RFA of 1.5 degree (i.e., pointing right of the intended target line for a right-handed player and left of the intended target line for a left-handed player). The first control golf club head comprised a hybrid type golf club which further comprised a square RFA of 0 degrees (i.e., the golf club face did not create an angle between the intended target line). The second control golf club head comprised a hybrid type golf club which further comprised a closed RFA of 1.5 degree (i.e., pointing left of the intended target line for a right-handed player and right of the intended target line for a left-handed player.
Twenty-three players were asked to hit 10 shots with each club. Once the players had completed the shots, they were asked to rate each club, the first exemplary golf club head, the first control golf club head, and the second control golf club head, on a scale of 1-5 based on how satisfied they were with the hybrid looking square at address. In other words, how satisfied they were with the golf club comprising an RFA that does not create an angle with the intended target line.
The first exemplary golf club head received an average score of 4.29 out of 5 across the twenty-three players. The first control golf club head received an average score of 3.96 out of 5 across the twenty-three players. The second control golf club head received an average score of 2.88 out of 5 across the twenty-three players. Therefore, a closed RFA, as was presented in the second control golf club head, is extremely dissatisfying to players. The square RFA, as presented in the first control golf club head, is satisfactory to players, however, it is not the preferred RFA. The open RFA, as presented in the first exemplary golf club head, was perceived as the club head that set up the squarest RFA at address and therefore is the preferred RFA for a hybrid type golf club.
In a second performance test, a second exemplary golf club was compared to a third control golf club head. The performance test measured the ball speeds, launch angles, spin rates, and carry distance of the second exemplary golf club head and the third control golf club head over 17 different players. Each of the 17 players hit 10 shots with each of the second exemplary golf club and the third control golf club head. Performance characteristics values were averaged using data collected.
The second exemplary golf club head was similar in many ways to golf club head 100 described above and comprised a driving-iron-type construction. The second exemplary golf club head comprised a 1.5-degree open RFA and a 1.5-degree hosel tilt. The second exemplary golf club head comprised a 108 cc volume and a loft angle of 19.5 degrees. The third control club head comprised a hollow body iron construction. The third control club head comprised a 0-degree RFA and 0-degree hosel tilt. The third control club head comprised a 51 cc volume and a loft angle of 19.5 degrees.
Average data values resulting from the performance test are summarized in Table 1. The performance test showed the second exemplary golf club head having a ball speed of 145.9 mph, a launch angle of 11.6 degrees, a spin rate of 4182.7 RPM, and 231.3 yards of carry. The performance test showed the third control club head having a ball speed of 142.8 mph, a launch angle of 11.6 degrees, a spin rate of 4010.5 RPM, and 225.8 yards of carry. The second exemplary golf club head outperformed the third control club head for ball speed, providing 3.1 mph more ball speed and for carry distance, providing 5.5 yards more carry distance. The second exemplary golf club head provided the same launch angle of 11.6 degrees. In conclusion, the second exemplary club head provides a player with similar performance characteristics and improved performance characteristics when compared with the third control club head. Further, the second exemplary club head provided a preferred address aesthetic as noted in Example 1 above.
In a third performance test, a third exemplary golf club was compared to a fourth control golf club head. The performance test measured the ball speeds, launch angles, spin rates, and carry distance of the third exemplary golf club head and the control golf club head over 20 different players. Each of the 20 players hit 10 shots with the third exemplary golf club and the fourth control golf club head. Once all shot data was collected all performance characteristics were averaged.
The third exemplary golf club head was similar in many ways to golf club head 100 described above. The third exemplary golf club head comprised a 1.5-degree open RFA and a 1.5-degree hosel tilt. The third exemplary golf club head comprised a 108 cc volume and a loft angle of 17.5 degrees. The fourth control club head comprised a 1.5-degree closed RFA and a 0-degree hosel tilt. The fourth control club head comprised a 128 cc volume and a 17.5 degree loft angle.
The third exemplary golf club head comprised a 1.5-degree open RFA and a 1.5-degree hosel tilt. The third exemplary golf club head comprised a 108 cc volume. The third exemplary golf club head comprised a 17.5 degrees loft. The third exemplary golf club head was substantially similar to golf club head 100 described above.
Average data values resulting from the performance test are summarized in Table 2. The performance test showed the third exemplary golf club head having a ball speed of 142.9 mph, a launch angle of 9.1 degrees, a spin rate of 3774.6 RPM, and 216.9 yards of carry. The performance test showed the fourth control club having a ball speed of 142.7 mph, a launch angle of 9.4 degrees, a spin rate of 3851.5 RPM, and 217.6 yards of carry. The third exemplary golf club head outperformed the control club head for ball speed, providing 3.1 mph more ball speed, and for carry distance, providing 5.5 yards more carry distance. The third exemplary golf club head provided the same launch angle 11.6 degrees. The third exemplary club head provides a player with improved performance characteristics when compared with the fourth control club head. Further, the third exemplary club head provided a preferred address aesthetic as noted in Example 1 above.
Replacement of one or more claimed elements constitutes reconstruction and not repair. Additionally, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described with regard to specific embodiments. The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element or elements that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced, however, are not to be construed as critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all of the claims, unless such benefits, advantages, solutions, or elements are expressly stated in such claims.
As the rules to golf may change from time to time (e.g., new regulations may be adopted or old rules may be eliminated or modified by golf standard organizations and/or governing bodies such as the United States Golf Association (USGA), the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St. Andrews (R&A), etc.), golf equipment related to the apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein may be conforming or non-conforming to the rules of golf at any particular time. Accordingly, golf equipment related to the apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein may be advertised, offered for sale, and/or sold as conforming or non-conforming golf equipment. The apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein are not limited in this regard.
While the above examples may be described in connection with a hybrid-type golf club, the apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein may be applicable to other types of golf club such as a driver wood-type golf club, a fairway wood-type golf club, a hybrid-type golf club, an iron-type golf club, a wedge-type golf club, or a putter-type golf club. Alternatively, the apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein may be applicable to other types of sports equipment such as a hockey stick, a tennis racket, a fishing pole, a ski pole, etc.
Moreover, embodiments and limitations disclosed herein are not dedicated to the public under the doctrine of dedication if the embodiments and/or limitations: (1) are not expressly claimed in the claims; and (2) are or are potentially equivalents of express elements and/or limitations in the claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
Various features and advantages of the disclosure are set forth in the following clauses and claims.
Clause 1: A golf club head comprising: a club body having a crown opposite a sole, a toe end opposite a heel end, a club face opposite a back end, and a hosel; and a hosel axis defined by the hosel, the hosel axis is oriented relative to a plane perpendicular to a surface upon which the sole rests at address to define a hosel tilt, the hosel tilt being greater than zero degrees, wherein the club body defines a resting face angle that is open relative to an intended target line.
Clause 2: The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the club body has a volume of 90 cubic centimeters to 130 cubic centimeters.
Clause 3: The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the club body has a volume of 108 cubic centimeters to 110 cubic centimeters.
Clause 4: The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the hosel tilt is 0.5 degrees to 2.0 degrees.
Clause 5: The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the hosel tilt is at least 1.5 degrees.
Clause 6: The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the resting face angle is at least 0.5 degrees open.
Clause 7: The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the resting face angle is 0.5 degrees to 1.0 degrees open.
Clause 8: The golf club head of clause 1, further comprising a center of gravity, the center of gravity is positioned between the toe end and a geometric center of the club face.
Clause 9: The golf club head of clause 8, wherein the center of gravity is positioned at least 0.001 inches towards the toe end from the geometric center of the club face.
Clause 10: The golf club head of clause 8, wherein the center of gravity is positioned between 0.001 inches and 0.25 towards the toe end from the geometric center of the club face.
Clause 11: The golf club head of clause 1, further comprising a first keel point defined by a first portion of the sole; a second keel point defined by a second portion of the sole; and a center of gravity, the center of gravity is positioned between the first keel point and the second keel point.
Clause 12: The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the first keel point is positioned between the center of gravity and the club face.
Clause 12: The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the first keel point is positioned between the center of gravity and the club face.
Clause 13: The golf club head of clause 11, wherein the second keel point is positioned between the center of gravity and the back end.
Clause 14: The golf club head of clause 13, wherein the first keel point comprises a first keel point height between 0.455 inches to 0.465 inches; and the second keel point comprises a second keel point height between 0.445 inches to 0.455 inches.
Clause 15: The golf club head of clause 13, wherein the first keel point comprises a first keel point height between 0.455 inches to 0.465 inches; and the second keel point comprises a second keel point height between 0.325 inches to 0.400 inches.
Clause 16: The golf club head of clause 13, wherein the first keel point comprises a first keel point height; the second keel point comprises a second keel point height; and the difference between the first keel point height and the second keel point height is between 0.001 inches to 0.01 inches.
Clause 17: The golf club head of clause 13, wherein the first keel point comprises a first keel point height; the second keel point comprises a second keel point height; and the difference between the first keel point height and the second keel point height is between 0.005 inches to 0.140 inches.
Clause 18: The golf club head of clause 11, further comprising a weight port defined by a portion of the sole and configured to removably receive a weight, a portion of the weight port defines the second keel point.
Clause 19: The golf club head of clause 1, further comprising a weight assembly, the weight assembly including a weight port defined by a portion of the sole and a weight removably received by the weight port.
Clause 20: The golf club head of clause 19, wherein the first keel point comprises a first keel point height; the second keel point comprises a second keel point height; and the difference between the first keel point height and the second keel point height is between 0.005 inches to 0.140 inches.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 63/366,651, filed Jun. 20, 2022.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63366651 | Jun 2022 | US |