The present disclosure relates generally to a golf club head with a molded cavity structure.
A golf club may generally include a club head disposed on the end of an elongate shaft. During play, the club head may be swung into contact with a stationary ball located on the ground in an effort to project the ball in an intended direction and with a desired vertical trajectory.
Many design parameters must be considered when forming a golf club head. For example, the design must provide enough structural resilience to withstand repeated impact forces between the club and the ball, as well as between the club and the ground. The club head must conform to size requirements set by different rule setting associations, and the face of the club must not have a coefficient of restitution above a predefined maximum (measured according to applicable standards). Assuming that certain predefined design constraints are satisfied, a club head design for a particular loft can be quantified by the magnitude and location of the center of gravity, as well as the head's moment of inertia about the center of gravity and/or the shaft.
The club's moment of inertia relates to the club's resistance to rotation (particularly during an off-center hit), and is often perceived as the club's measure of “forgiveness.” In typical club designs, high moments of inertia are desired to reduce the club's tendency to push or fade a ball. Achieving a high moment of inertia generally involves moving mass as close to the perimeter of the club as possible (to maximize the moment of inertia about the center of gravity), and as close to the toe as possible (to maximize the moment of inertia about the shaft). In iron-type golf club heads, this desire for increased moments of inertia have given rise to designs such as the cavity-back club head and the hollow club head.
While the moment of inertia affects the forgiveness of a club head, the location of the center of gravity behind the club face (and above the sole) generally affects the trajectory of a shot for a given face loft angle. A center of gravity that is positioned as far rearward (away from the face) and as low (close to the sole) as possible typically results in a ball flight that has a higher trajectory than a club head with a center of gravity placed more forward and/or higher.
While a high moment of inertia is obtained by increasing the perimeter weighting of the club head or by moving mass toward the toe, an increase in the total mass/swing weight of the club head (i.e., the magnitude of the center of gravity) has a strong, negative effect on club head speed and hitting distance. Said another way, to maximize club head speed (and hitting distance), a lower total mass is desired; however a lower total mass generally reduces the club head's moment of inertia (and forgiveness).
In the tension between swing speed (mass) and forgiveness (moment of inertia), it may be desirable to place varying amounts of mass in specific locations throughout the club head to tailor a club's performance to a particular golfer or ability level. In this manner, the total club head mass may generally be categorized into two categories: structural mass and discretionary mass.
Structural mass generally refers to the mass of the materials that are required to provide the club head with the structural resilience needed to withstand repeated impacts. Structural mass is highly design-dependent, and provides a designer with a relatively low amount of control over specific mass distribution. On the other hand, discretionary mass is any additional mass that may be added to the club head design for the sole purpose of customizing the performance and/or forgiveness of the club. In an ideal club design, the amount of structural mass would be minimized (without sacrificing resiliency) to provide a designer with a greater ability to customize club performance, while maintaining a traditional or desired swing weight.
A golf club head includes a strike face, a crown, and a sole, and is formed from a forward section and a body section that are coupled together. The forward section includes the strike face, and the body section includes an upper shell defining a portion of the crown, a lower shell defining a portion of the sole, and an internal wall extending between the upper shell and the lower shell. The internal wall is molded from a polymeric material and is integrally formed with one of the upper shell and the lower shell. At least one of the upper shell and the lower shell defines an opening that is in communication with a cavity provided between the upper shell and the lower shell and at least partially defined by the internal wall.
In one configuration, the internal wall is one or more internal walls, the opening is one or more openings, and the cavity is one or more cavities. The number of cavities is greater than or equal to the number of openings, and each of the one or more cavities is in communication with a respective one of the one or more openings.
The above features and advantages and other features and advantages of the present technology are readily apparent from the following detailed description when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to identify like or identical components in the various views,
When the club head 10 is held in a neutral hitting position (i.e., where the shaft 16 is maintained entirely in a vertical plane and at a prescribed lie angle relative to a horizontal ground plane) the club head 10 may generally include a crown 18 and a sole 20, where the sole 20 is disposed between the ground plane and the crown 18. For the purpose of this description, the crown 18 may meet the sole 20 where the outer surface of the club head 10 has a vertical tangent (i.e., relative to the horizontal ground plane). The club head 10 may further include a hosel 22 that generally extends from the crown 18 and is configured to receive a shaft adapter or otherwise couple the club head 10 with the elongate shaft 16.
The forward section 12 of the club head 10 includes a strike face 26 that is intended to impact a golf ball during a normal swing, a frame 28 that surrounds the strike face 26, and may further include the hosel 22. Because an impact with a ball can generate considerably large stresses near the point of impact and at the hosel 22, the forward section 12 may be formed from one or more metallic materials that are suitable to withstand any expected impact loading. Examples of suitable materials may include, but are not limited to, various alloys of stainless steel or titanium.
The strike face 26 generally forms the leading surface of the club head 10 and has a slight convex/arcuate curvature that extends out from the club head 10. In one embodiment, the curvature (i.e., bulge and/or roll) of the strike face 26 has a radius of from about 7 inches to about 20 inches. Additionally, as is commonly understood, the strike face 26 may be disposed at an angle to a vertical plane when the club is held in a neutral hitting position. This angle is generally referred to as the loft angle or slope of the club. Wood-type club heads (including hybrid woods), such as illustrated in
In one configuration, the frame 28 includes a swept-back sidewall 30 that extends away from the strike face 26 and may resemble a cup-face-style design. The sidewall 30 may form a portion of both the sole 20 and the crown 18, and may further include one or more surface profile features, such as an indented compression channel 32. The frame 28 may be rigidly attached to the strike face 26 either through integral manufacturing techniques, or through separate processes such as welding, brazing, or adhering.
The body section 14 may be coupled with the forward section 12, and may include an upper shell 40 that defines a portion of the crown 18 (as shown in
To reduce the structural weight of the club head 10 while increasing the design flexibility, the upper shell 40 of the body section 14 may be formed from a molded polymeric material and adhered, or otherwise affixed to both the lower shell 42 and the forward section 12. Techniques and joint designs for adhering the upper shell 40 of the body section 14 to the lower shell 42 and/or forward section 12 are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/724,328, filed May 28, 2015 and entitled “GOLF CLUB HEAD WITH MOLDED POLYMERIC BODY” which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In one configuration, to achieve the desired level of design flexibility, the polymeric material may be molded into shape using a molding technique, such as, injection molding, compression molding, blow molding, thermoforming or the like. To provide the maximum design flexibility, the preferred molding technique is injection molding.
While weight savings and design flexibility are important, the polymeric material must still be strong enough to withstand the stress that is experienced when the club head 10 impacts a ball. This may be accomplished through a combination of structural and material design choices. With regard to material selection, it is preferable to use a moldable polymeric material that has a tensile strength of greater than about 200 MPa (according to ASTM D638), or more preferably greater than about 250 MPa. Additionally, for ease of molding, if the polymeric material is filled, then the material should desirably have a resin content of greater than about 40%, or even greater than about 55% by weight.
In one embodiment, the upper shell 40 of the body section 14 may be formed from a polymeric material that may be a filled thermoplastic. The filled thermoplastic may include, for example, a resin and a plurality of discontinuous fibers (i.e., “chopped fibers”). The discontinuous/chopped fibers may include, for example, chopped carbon fibers or chopped glass fibers and are embedded within the resin prior to molding the body section 14. In one configuration, the polymeric material may be a “long fiber thermoplastic” where the discontinuous fibers are embedded in a thermoplastic resin and each have a designed fiber length of from about 5 mm to about 15 mm. In another configuration, the polymeric material may be a “short fiber thermoplastic” where the discontinuous fibers are similarly embedded in a thermoplastic resin, though may each have a designed length of from about 0.01 mm to about 3 mm. Additionally, in some configurations, discontinuous chopped fibers may be characterized by an aspect ratio (e.g., length/diameter of the fiber) of greater than about 10, or more preferably greater than about 50, and less than about 1500. In one configuration, the filled polymeric material may generally have a fiber length of from about 0.01 mm to about 12 mm and a resin content of from about 40% to about 90% by weight, or more preferably from about 55% to about 70% by weight.
One suitable material may include a thermoplastic polyamide (e.g., PA6 or PA66) filled with chopped carbon fiber (i.e., a carbon-filled polyamide). Other resins may include certain polyimides, polyamide-imides, polyetheretherketones (PEEK), polycarbonates, engineering polyurethanes, and/or other similar materials.
While it is preferable for the upper shell 40 to be formed from the polymeric material, the lower shell 42 may be formed from either the polymeric material (i.e., in a similar manner as the upper shell 40), or may be alternatively formed from a metallic material. For example, in one configuration, the lower shell 42 may be formed from the same or similar metallic material as the frame 28, and may either be welded to the frame 28 or integrally formed with the frame 28.
A lower shell 42 that is formed from a polymeric material may provide advantages such as structural weight reduction and increased design flexibility. While these are beneficial qualities, a metal lower shell may also present certain advantages. For example, a metallic lower shell may provide increased durability to the sole 20, which routinely impacts the ground. Also, a metallic lower shell may provide increased sole weighting that may move the center of gravity lower (particularly when paired with a polymeric upper shell). A lower club head center of gravity tends to produce a ball impact with more spin and a higher launch angle, which are seen as desirable qualities to certain golfers and/or in connection with clubs having certain loft angles.
The upper shell 40 and the lower shell 42 may combine to form various, unique club head geometries that may not be feasible with an all-metal design (i.e., feasible under the current consumer-driven weight constraints). More specifically, the present design may provide a wood-style club head that includes one or more internal cavity structures 44 (“cavities 44”) that are open/exposed through the crown 18 or sole 20. As the number or complexity of these cavities 44 increase, it becomes increasingly unlikely that an all-metal design could fall within the desired head weight targets. The unique geometries that are obtainable using these described methods may serve functional and/or aesthetic purposes in an ultimate goal of creating a more marketable consumer product.
The lower shell 42, shown in
If multiple openings 48 are provided, then it is important that an internal wall 46 contact the lower shell 42 between the respective openings. This is needed to ensure that the club head 10 conforms to applicable regulations and each cavity 44 is only in communication with one of the openings 48.
Through contact with both the crown 18 and sole 20, one or more of the internal walls 46 may be operative to stiffen the club head 10. More specifically, a secured internal wall 46 may serve as a strut or flange that reinforces the crown 18 and/or sole 20 and increases one or more modal frequencies of the structure. This stiffening may be useful in the sole 20, particularly in the vicinity of openings 48 (i.e., where the opening 48 compromises the structural integrity of the shell) and/or between adjacent openings 48. In a more general manner, any internal wall 46 may be operative to stiffen/reinforce the component that it extends from, which may also allow for thinner materials to be used for that respective component. As such, the present design provides a means for these structural, stiffening features to be utilized in a design context to provide a more unique and aggressive appearance.
One manner of securing the polymeric, internal wall 46 to the lower shell 42 of the body 14 is schematically shown in
In the embodiment shown in
For the purpose of this description, the one or more internal walls 46 that separate adjacent openings 48 may generally be referred to as primary internal walls 54. As noted above, each primary internal wall 54 fully extends between the upper shell 40 and the lower shell 42 and is preferably secured in place to provide a structural reinforcement. Another main purpose of each primary wall 54 is to ensure that no cavity 44 is in communication with more than one opening.
In addition to any primary internal walls 54, there may also be one or more secondary internal walls 56. Each of the secondary internal walls 56 may serve a more aesthetic purpose, and need not be secured to both the crown 18 and sole 20. As shown in
A forward wall 58 may be provided within the club head 10 to separate the one or more cavities 44 from the forward section 12 near the strike face 26. The forward wall 58 may at least partially define a closed cavity 60 between itself and the forward section 12. In one configuration, the forward wall 58 may contact and/or be affixed between the upper shell 40 and the lower shell 42 to prevent liquids from entering, and potentially becoming trapped within the closed cavity 60.
In a more general sense, the embodiment of
In another, more specific embodiment, the upper shell 40 may include a plurality of internal walls 46, where the plurality of internal walls 46 and the crown 18 at least partially define three or more cavities 44, and each of the three or more cavities 44 is in communication with a respective one of the plurality of openings 48. Further, the number of cavities 44 is greater than or equal to the number of openings, such as by utilizing one or more secondary internal walls 56. Additionally, in a further variation of this embodiment, there may be at least two more of the cavities 44 than the openings 48, such as shown in
The designs described above (as wells as combinations thereof) may provide certain performance, acoustic, and/or aesthetic benefits, which may be desirable to some or all of the golf market. These designs are largely made possible (i.e., within accepted head weight and swing weight standards/ranges) by molding a majority of the body 14 from a polymeric material. From a manufacturing perspective, it is preferable for each internal wall 54, 56 to be integrally molded with one of the upper and/or lower shells 40, 42 of the body 14. Necessarily then, it is preferable for at least one of the upper and lower shells 40, 42 to be formed from the polymeric material as well.
“A,” “an,” “the,” “at least one,” and “one or more” are used interchangeably to indicate that at least one of the item is present; a plurality of such items may be present unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. All numerical values of parameters (e.g., of quantities or conditions) in this specification, including the appended claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about” whether or not “about” actually appears before the numerical value. “About” indicates that the stated numerical value allows some slight imprecision (with some approach to exactness in the value; about or reasonably close to the value; nearly). If the imprecision provided by “about” is not otherwise understood in the art with this ordinary meaning, then “about” as used herein indicates at least variations that may arise from ordinary methods of measuring and using such parameters. In addition, disclosure of ranges includes disclosure of all values and further divided ranges within the entire range. Each value within a range and the endpoints of a range are hereby all disclosed as separate embodiment. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated items, but do not preclude the presence of other items. As used in this specification, the term “or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the listed items. When the terms first, second, third, etc. are used to differentiate various items from each other, these designations are merely for convenience and do not limit the items.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/942,152, filed on Nov. 16, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/828,027, filed on Aug. 17, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,427,631, granted on Aug. 30, 2016, which claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/167,701, filed May 28, 2015, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5570886 | Rigal | Nov 1996 | A |
6074308 | Domas | Jun 2000 | A |
6332847 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6375583 | Solheim | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6616547 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6974393 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7597634 | Werner et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7914393 | Hirsch et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8187116 | Boyd | May 2012 | B2 |
8956244 | Westrum et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9101811 | Goudarzi | Aug 2015 | B1 |
20030104878 | Yabu | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20070004532 | Lee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014070343 | May 2014 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180071593 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62167701 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14942152 | Nov 2015 | US |
Child | 15815438 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14828027 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 14942152 | US |