The present invention relates generally to a golf club head having a polymeric face.
A golf club may generally include a club head disposed on the end of an elongate shaft. During play, the club head may be swung into contact with a stationary ball located on the ground in an effort to project the ball in an intended direction and with a desired vertical trajectory. This impact may generate momentary impact forces on the club face that can peak in the range of about 6520 N to about 18000 N (about 1520 lbf to about 4000 lbf).
Many design parameters must be considered when forming a golf club head. For example, the design must provide enough structural resilience to withstand repeated impact forces between the club and the ball, as well as between the club and the ground. The club head must conform to maximum size requirements set by different rule setting associations, and the face of the club must not have a coefficient of restitution above a predefined maximum (measured according to applicable standards). Assuming that certain predefined design constraints are satisfied, a club head design for a particular loft is typically quantified by the magnitude and location of the center of gravity, as well as the head's moment of inertia about the center of gravity and/or the shaft.
The club's moment of inertia relates to the club's resistance to rotation (particularly during an off-center hit), and is often perceived as the club's measure of “forgiveness.” In typical club designs, high moments of inertia are desired to reduce the club's tendency to push or fade a ball. Achieving a high moment of inertia generally involves moving mass as close to the perimeter of the club as possible (to maximize the moment of inertia about the center of gravity), and as close to the toe as possible (to maximize the moment of inertia about the shaft).
While the moment of inertia affects the forgiveness of a club head, the location of the center of gravity behind the club face (and above the sole) generally affects the trajectory of a shot for a given face loft angle. A center of gravity that is positioned as far rearward (away from the face) and as low (close to the sole) as possible typically results in a ball flight that has a higher trajectory than a club head with a center of gravity placed more forward and/or higher.
While a high moment of inertia is obtained by increasing the perimeter weighting of the club head, an increase in the total mass/swing weight of the club head (i.e., the magnitude of the center of gravity) has a strong, negative effect on club head speed and hitting distance. Said another way, to maximize club head speed (and hitting distance), a lower total mass is desired; however a lower total mass generally reduces the club head's moment of inertia (and forgiveness).
In the tension between swing speed (mass) and forgiveness (moment of inertia), it may be desirable to place varying amounts of mass in specific locations throughout the club head to tailor a club's performance to a particular golfer or ability level. In this manner, the total club head mass may generally be categorized into two categories: structural mass and discretionary mass.
Structural mass generally refers to the mass of the materials that are required to provide the club head with the structural resilience needed to withstand repeated impacts. Structural mass is highly design-dependent, and provides a designer with a relatively low amount of control over specific mass distribution. On the other hand, discretionary mass is any additional mass that may be added to the club head design for the sole purpose of customizing the performance and/or forgiveness of the club. In an ideal club design, the amount of structural mass would be minimized (without sacrificing resiliency) to provide a designer with a greater ability to customize club performance, while maintaining a traditional or desired swing weight.
In the interest of minimizing the total structural mass, most metal woods, for example, generally employ a thin metal face and hollow structural shell formed from a high strength, lightweight metal alloy. Such a design, while effective in reducing structural mass, may involve complex, multi-stage manufacturing processes, and may be limited in further advancements due to the cost prohibitive nature of more advanced alloys.
A golf club head includes a body and a face plate insert. The body includes an annular face support having a recessed shelf configured to receive the face plate insert, and partially defining a central cavity. The face plate insert includes a hitting surface and a rear surface that is opposite the hitting surface. The face plate insert is disposed within the annular face such that the rear surface of the face plate insert abuts the recessed shelf The face plate insert includes a polymeric material that is disposed across the cavity and that has a tensile strength of at least about 220 MPa. In one configuration, the polymeric material is a polyamide that may be glass-fiber filled, carbon-fiber filled, or graphite-fiber filled.
In one configuration, the face plate insert may be a laminate that is formed from a metallic hitting plate disposed in contact with the polymeric material. In such a configuration, the metallic hitting plate may then form the hitting surface of the face plate insert. The metallic hitting plate may be mechanically bonded and/or co-molded to the polymeric material via one or more protrusions that extend from the metallic hitting plate into the polymeric material. Such protrusions may be trapped within the polymeric material layer, for example, during an overmolding process to apply the polymeric material to a rear side of the metallic hitting plate. The metallic hitting plate may then include a plurality of grooves that are recessed into the hitting surface and concave relative to the metallic hitting plate.
In one configuration, the laminate may further include a metallic rear plate that is disposed in contact with the polymeric material, and which forms the rear surface of the face plate insert. As such, the metallic hitting plate may be disposed on an opposite side of the polymeric material from the metallic rear plate (i.e., the various layers forma metal-polymer-metal laminate).
In one configuration, the golf club head may be an iron-type club head, wherein the central cavity is an open cavity. By “open cavity” it is intended to mean that the body and face plate insert cooperate to only partially surround the open cavity. In another configuration, the golf club head may be a wood-type club head (e.g., metal wood, driver, fairway wood, or hybrid iron), wherein the central cavity is a closed cavity. By “closed cavity” it is intended to mean that the body and face plate insert cooperate to entirely surround the closed cavity.
The above features and advantages and other features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to identify like or identical components in the various views,
The face plate 12 of the club head 10 may generally define a hitting surface 18 that is intended to contact a golf ball during a normal swing. The hitting surface 18 includes a plurality of grooves 20 that are recessed into the face plate 12 in a generally concave manner. The hitting surface 18 may either be substantially planar, or may have a slight convex or arcuate curvature that extends out from the club head 10. As is commonly understood, the hitting surface 18 may be disposed at an angle to a vertical plane when the club is held in a neutral hitting position. This angle may be generally referred to as the loft angle or slope of the club. Wood-type club heads (including hybrid woods) may most commonly have a loft angle of from about 8.5 degrees to about 24 degrees, while iron-type clubs may most commonly have loft angles from about 18 degrees to about 60 degrees, though other loft angles are possible and have been commercially sold.
The body 14 of the club head 10 may generally be configured to support the face plate 12 and to provide a connection means between the face plate 12 and the elongate shaft 16. With continued reference to
stepped inner surface 48 (i.e., a “recessed shelf 48”) configured to receive and support the face plate 12. In this manner, the club may be considered a “cavity back” club, where club head mass is pushed toward the outer perimeter, leaving a void or “cavity” 46 in a central region of the club.
The body 14 may typically be a metal or metal alloy that is formed into a proper shape using either a casting or forging process. Examples of suitable metal alloys include steel (e.g., AISI type 1020 or AISI type 8620 steel), stainless steel (e.g., AISI type 304 or AISI type 630 stainless steel) or titanium (e.g., Ti-6Al-4V Titanium alloy), however other metal alloys, metal amorphous alloys, and/or non-metallic materials known in the art may similarly be used.
As generally illustrated,
In the embodiment 52 provided in
Finally,
As further illustrated in
The use of a polymer layer in the face plate 12 may reduce the mass of the face plate by up to about 30 g. If desired, this mass may then be redistributed throughout the club body 14 as discretionary weight (i.e., it may be specifically positioned at the discretion of the club designer). For example, this mass may be distributed around the perimeter of the body 14 (i.e., pushed from the face plate outward toward the annular face support 44) to increase the moment of inertia of the club head 10; alternatively, the mass may be concentrated at specific locations to alter/move the center of gravity of the club head 10 (e.g., to move the center of gravity more proximate to the sole 22 (i.e., lower), toe portion 28, and/or rearward from the face plate 12). For example, as shown in each of
While
Similar to the iron embodiments 50, 52, 54 provided in
As generally illustrated in
As generally shown in
While the best modes for carrying out the invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims. It is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative only and not as limiting.
“A,” “an,” “the,” “at least one,” and “one or more” are used interchangeably to indicate that at least one of the item is present; a plurality of such items may be present unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. All numerical values of parameters (e.g., of quantities or conditions) in this specification, including the appended claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about” whether or not “about” actually appears before the numerical value. “About” indicates that the stated numerical value allows some slight imprecision (with some approach to exactness in the value; about or reasonably close to the value; nearly). If the imprecision provided by “about” is not otherwise understood in the art with this ordinary meaning, then “about” as used herein indicates at least variations that may arise from ordinary methods of measuring and using such parameters. In addition, disclosure of ranges includes disclosure of all values and further divided ranges within the entire range. Each value within a range and the endpoints of a range are hereby all disclosed as separate embodiment. In this description of the invention, for convenience, “polymer” and “resin” are used interchangeably to encompass resins, oligomers, and polymers. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated items, but do not preclude the presence of other items. As used in this specification, the term “or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the listed items. In other words, “or” means “and/or.” When the terms first, second, third, etc. are used to differentiate various items from each other, these designations are merely for convenience and do not limit the items.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/108,476, filed Aug. 22, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/995,786, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,080,936, filed Jan. 14, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/971,222, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,283,448, filed on Aug. 20, 2013, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4884812 | Nagasaki | Dec 1989 | A |
5288070 | Chen | Feb 1994 | A |
5316298 | Hutin | May 1994 | A |
5447311 | Viollaz et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5586947 | Hutin | Dec 1996 | A |
5669827 | Nagamoto | Sep 1997 | A |
5720673 | Anderson | Feb 1998 | A |
5766094 | Mahffey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5827131 | Mahaffey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
RE35955 | Clive | Nov 1998 | E |
5967903 | Cheng | Oct 1999 | A |
6364789 | Kosmatka | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368231 | Chen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428427 | Kosmatka | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6743117 | Gilbert | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6986715 | Mahaffey | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7022031 | Nishio | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7115041 | Guard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7182698 | Tseng | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7232380 | Nakahara | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7267620 | Chao et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7479071 | Adams | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7731604 | Wahl | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7819757 | Soracco et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7874938 | Chao | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7892106 | Matsunaga | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8342982 | Clausen et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366566 | Rollinson | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8388464 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8444504 | Chao et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8491415 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8777776 | Wahl et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8882609 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9283448 | Sander | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9937388 | Cardani et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10080936 | Sander | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10343036 | Sander | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20070049403 | Chen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072698 | Juang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070099723 | Tateno | May 2007 | A1 |
20080108452 | Chiang | May 2008 | A1 |
20090163291 | Chao | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100056296 | Kumamoto | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100151960 | Wahl | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120010020 | Golden | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120135819 | Uetz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120184394 | Boyd | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130150178 | Rollinson | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140162809 | Soracco | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2288743 | Jan 1995 | GB |
2003339926 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2005287667 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007117635 | May 2007 | JP |
2009136514 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009148558 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2010136736 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2013009735 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013509909 | Mar 2013 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190299067 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16108476 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16446550 | US | |
Parent | 14995786 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 16108476 | US | |
Parent | 13971222 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14995786 | US |