The present invention relates generally to a golf club head having a polymeric hosel.
A golf club may generally include a club head disposed on the end of an elongate shaft. During play, the club head may be swung into contact with a stationary ball located on the ground in an effort to project the ball in an intended direction and with a desired vertical trajectory.
Many design parameters must be considered when forming a golf club head. For example, the design must provide enough structural resilience to withstand repeated impact forces between the club and the ball, as well as between the club and the ground. The club head must conform to maximum size requirements set by different rule setting associations, and the face of the club must not have a coefficient of restitution above a predefined maximum (measured according to applicable standards). Assuming that certain predefined design constraints are satisfied, a club head design is typically quantified by the magnitude and location of the center of gravity, as well as the head's moment of inertia about the center of gravity and/or the shaft.
The club's moment of inertia relates to the club's resistance to rotation (particularly during an off-center hit), and is often perceived as the club's measure of “forgiveness.” In typical driver designs, high moments of inertia are desired to reduce the club's tendency to push or fade a ball. Achieving a high moment of inertia generally involves placing mass as close to the perimeter of the club as possible (to maximize the moment of inertia about the center of gravity), and as close to the toe as possible (to maximize the moment of inertia about the shaft).
While the moment of inertia affects the forgiveness of a club head, the location of the center of gravity behind the club face (and above the sole) generally affects the trajectory of a shot for a given face loft angle. A center of gravity that is positioned as far rearward (away from the face) and as low (close to the sole) as possible typically results in a ball flight that has a higher trajectory than a club head with a center of gravity placed more forward and/or higher.
While a high moment of inertia is obtained by increasing the perimeter weighting of the club head, an increase in the total mass/swing weight of the club head (i.e., the magnitude of the center of gravity) has a strong, negative effect on club head speed and hitting distance. Said another way, to maximize club head speed (and hitting distance), a lower total mass is desired; however a lower total mass generally reduces the club head's moment of inertia (and forgiveness).
In the tension between swing speed (mass) and forgiveness (moment of inertia), it may be desirable to place varying amounts of mass in specific locations throughout the club head to tailor a club's performance to a particular golfer or ability level. In this manner, the total club head mass may generally be categorized into two categories: structural mass and discretionary mass.
Structural mass generally refers to the mass of the materials that are required to provide the club head with the structural resilience needed to withstand repeated impacts. Structural mass is highly design-dependent, and provides a designer with a relatively low amount of control over specific mass distribution. On the other hand, discretionary mass is any additional mass that may be added to the club head design for the sole purpose of customizing the performance and/or forgiveness of the club. In an ideal club design, the amount of structural mass would be minimized (without sacrificing resiliency) to provide a designer with a greater ability to customize club performance, while maintaining a swing weight that is expected by the consumer.
A golf club head includes a face, a club head body, and a hosel. The hosel has a tubular hosel body extending along a longitudinal axis and defining a bore. The bore is configured to receive a golf club shaft or a shaft adapter. The tubular hosel body is molded from a polymeric material that includes a resin and a plurality of fibers, each fiber has a length of from about 0.01 mm to about 12 mm.
In one configuration, a method of manufacturing a polymeric hosel for a golf club head includes molding a tubular hosel body from a polymeric material. The tubular hosel body is molded about a longitudinal axis and defines a bore configured to receive a golf club shaft or a shaft adapter. Additionally, the polymeric material comprises a resin and a plurality of fibers that each have a length of from about 0.01 mm to about 12 mm. The resin is preferably of thermoplastic, and may be a carbon-filled polyamide.
The above features and advantages and other features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to identify like or identical components in the various views,
The face 12 of the club head 10 generally forms the leading surface of the club head 10 and has a slight convex/arcuate curvature that extends out from the club head 10. In one embodiment, the curvature (i.e., bulge and/or roll) of the face 12 has a radius of from about 7 inches to about 20 inches. Additionally, as is commonly understood, the face 12 may be disposed at an angle to a vertical plane when the club is held in a neutral hitting position. This angle may be generally referred to as the loft angle or slope of the club. Wood-type club heads (including hybrid woods), such as illustrated in
The body 14 of the club head 10 may generally be configured to support the face 12 and to aid in coupling the face 12 to the elongate shaft 16. The face 12 may be secured to the body 14, for example, through the use of adhesives, mechanical fasteners 30, or welding (i.e., if similar materials are used for the face 12 and body 14). Because an impact with a ball can generate considerably large stresses near the point of impact, in one configuration, the face 12 may be formed from one or more metallic materials that are suitable to withstand any expected impact loading. Examples of suitable materials may include, but are not limited to, various alloys of stainless steel or titanium.
Referring again to
To reduce structural mass beyond what is economically viable with metal alloys, the body 14 of the club head 10 may be formed from a polymeric material. The comparatively low density nature of polymeric materials also permits greater design flexibility, at less of a structural weight penalty, than similar designs made from metal. In one configuration, the desired design flexibility may be achieved by molding the polymeric material into shape using a molding technique, such as, injection molding, compression molding, blow molding, thermoforming or the like. To provide the maximum design flexibility, the preferred molding technique is injection molding.
While weight savings and design flexibility are important, the polymeric material must still be strong enough to withstand the stress that is experienced when the club head 10 impacts a ball. This may be accomplished through a combination of structural and material design choices. With regard to material selection, it is preferable to use a moldable polymeric material that has a tensile strength of greater than about 200 MPa (according to ASTM D638), or more preferably greater than about 250 MPa.
In one embodiment, the body 14 may be formed from a polymeric material that comprises a resin and a plurality of discontinuous fibers (i.e., “chopped fibers”). The discontinuous/chopped fibers may include, for example, chopped carbon fibers or chopped glass fibers and are embedded within the resin prior to molding the body 14. In one configuration, the polymeric material may be a “long fiber thermoplastic” where the discontinuous fibers are embedded in a thermoplastic resin and each have a designed fiber length of from about 3 mm to about 12 mm. In another configuration, the polymeric material may be a “short fiber thermoplastic” where the discontinuous fibers are similarly embedded in a thermoplastic resin, though may each have a designed length of from about 0.01 mm to about 3 mm. In either case, the fiber length may be affected by the molding process, and due to breakage, some may be shorter than the described range. Additionally, in some configurations, discontinuous chopped fibers may be characterized by an aspect ratio (e.g., length/diameter of the fiber) of greater than about 10, or more preferably greater than about 50, and less than about 1500. Regardless of the specific type of discontinuous chopped fibers used, the material may have a fiber length of from about 0.01 mm to about 12 mm and a resin content of from about 40% to about 90% by weight, or more preferably from about 55% to about 70% by weight.
One suitable material may include a thermoplastic polyamide (e.g., PA6 or PA66) filled with chopped carbon fiber (i.e., a carbon-filled polyamide). Other resins may include certain polyimides, polyamide-imides, polyetheretherketones (PEEK), polycarbonates, engineering polyurethanes, and/or other similar materials.
In one configuration, the body 14 may be entirely molded through a single process. If complex geometries are desired, molding techniques such as lost core molding or injection molding with collapsible slides may be used to form any internal recesses or cavities. In another configuration, instead of a unitary design, the body 14 may be formed as two or more portions that are subsequently joined together. Such a multi-piece design may reduce the complexity of the molding process, but may add additional manufacturing steps to fuse the components together.
Referring to
As shown, the tubular hosel body 40 generally extends between a first end 46 and a second end 48. The first end 46 defines a first opening 50 through which the golf club shaft 16 or shaft adapter 28 may be inserted into the bore 44. The first opening 50 may have a similar diameter as the bore, or may define a slightly larger and/or chamfered ingress surface. In one configuration, the second end 48 may define a second opening 52 that has a smaller diameter than the first opening 50. The second opening 52 may, for example, be dimensioned to allow a threaded portion 54 of a screw 56 to extend into the bore 44, but may prevent a head 58 of the screw 56 from entering. The screw 56 may be operative to secure an end of the shaft 16 or shaft adapter 28 to the second end 48 of the tubular hosel body 40 such that the shaft 16 or shaft adapter 28 is restrained from being withdrawn from the bore 44.
In one configuration, an internal surface 58 of the hosel body 40 may include a plurality of splines 60. The plurality of splines 60 may be directly adjacent to the first end 46, and may be operative to inhibit relative rotation between the shaft 16 or shaft adapter 28 and the hosel body 40 when the shaft 16 or shaft adapter 28 is inserted into the bore 44. Each respective spline 60 may have a height or depth of, for example, from about 0.25 mm to about 0.5 mm.
To further reduce the structural weight of the golf club head 10, the hosel 26, and specifically the tubular hosel body 40, may be molded from a polymeric material that includes both a resin and a plurality of discontinuous/chopped fibers. The chopped fibers may include chopped carbon fibers or chopped glass fibers and are embedded within the resin prior to molding the body 14. In one configuration, the polymeric material used to form the hosel body 40 may be a “long fiber thermoplastic” or a “short fiber thermoplastic” that desirably has a fiber length of from about 0.01 mm to about 12 mm and a resin content of from about 40% to about 90% by weight, or more preferably from about 55% to about 70% by weight.
One suitable material for the hosel body 40 may include a thermoplastic polyamide (e.g., PA6 or PA66) filled with chopped carbon fiber (i.e., a carbon-filled polyamide). Other resins may include certain polyimides, polyamide-imides, polyetheretherketones (PEEK), polycarbonates, engineering polyurethanes, and/or other similar materials.
Because the hosel 26 is generally a high-stress portion of the club head 10, it is important to ensure that the design of the polymeric hosel is strong enough to repeatedly withstand expected impact forces. To provide an optimized design that achieves the required strength at the lowest possible weight, it is preferable to align as many of the embedded reinforcing fibers in a parallel orientation with the longitudinal axis 42 as possible. While it is not likely possible to achieve 100% of the fibers in perfect alignment, it is preferable to achieve a fiber orientation throughout the hosel body 40 where at least 50% of the fibers have an average longitudinal orientation within about 30 degrees of parallel to the longitudinal axis 42 of the bore 44. In other, even more preferred embodiments, at least 60% of the fibers are oriented within about 20 degrees of parallel, or at least 70% of the fibers are oriented within about 10 degrees of parallel to the longitudinal axis 42.
To align the most number of fibers 70 in a parallel orientation with the longitudinal axis 42 of the bore 44, it may be desirable to mold the hosel body 40 with a mold flow that is also parallel with the longitudinal axis 42. In one embodiment, this may be achieved by gating a corresponding mold proximate to the second end 48 of the hosel body 40 and venting the mold proximate to the first end 46. For example, as shown in
In this design, the splines 60 may be integrally molded with the tubular hosel body 40. Additionally, the hosel 26 may be either integrally molded with the body 14, or could be separately molded and attached via a joining method such as welding or adhering.
In one configuration, a method of manufacturing a polymeric hosel 26 for a golf club head 10 includes molding a tubular hosel body 40 from a polymeric material. The tubular hosel body 40 is molded about a longitudinal axis 42 and defines a bore 44 configured to receive a golf club shaft 16 or a shaft adapter 28. Additionally, the polymeric material comprises a resin 72 and a plurality of fibers 70 that each have a length 76 of from about 0.01 mm to about 12 mm. The resin is preferably of thermoplastic, and may be a carbon-filled polyamide.
Molding the tubular hosel body 40 may include injecting the polymeric material into a mold such that it flows from a first end 46 of the tubular hosel body 40 to a second end of the tubular hosel body 48. To promote a more uniform flow, the mold may be vented at the second end 48 of the tubular hosel body 40. In one configuration, at least 50% of the plurality of fibers to be oriented within about 30 degrees of parallel to the longitudinal axis of the bore.
When formed in this manner, the hosel 26 may avoid any need for metallic inserts to be secured within the bore 44 or for ancillary metallic hosel supports. Testing of a molded polymeric hosel 26 with a splined, polymeric shaft adapter 28 passed multiple durability tests, performed cumulatively on the same hosel 26, without any signs of compromised hosel integrity or significant wear. The cumulative testing included 3000 impacts (of progressively increasing speed) between the face 12 and a golf ball, followed by robot swing testing, and numerous insertion/removal cycles of the shaft adapter 28.
“A,” “an,” “the,” “at least one,” and “one or more” are used interchangeably to indicate that at least one of the item is present; a plurality of such items may be present unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. All numerical values of parameters (e.g., of quantities or conditions) in this specification, including the appended claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about” whether or not “about” actually appears before the numerical value. “About” indicates that the stated numerical value allows some slight imprecision (with some approach to exactness in the value; about or reasonably close to the value; nearly). If the imprecision provided by “about” is not otherwise understood in the art with this ordinary meaning, then “about” as used herein indicates at least variations that may arise from ordinary methods of measuring and using such parameters. In addition, disclosure of ranges includes disclosure of all values and further divided ranges within the entire range. Each value within a range and the endpoints of a range are hereby all disclosed as separate embodiment. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated items, but do not preclude the presence of other items. As used in this specification, the term “or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the listed items. When the terms first, second, third, etc. are used to differentiate various items from each other, these designations are merely for convenience and do not limit the items.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/432,776, filed on Jun. 5, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,758,787 issued on Sep. 1, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/812,375, filed Nov. 14, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,350,462 issued on Jul. 16, 2019, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/724,373, filed May 28, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,849,347 issued Dec. 26, 2017, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3571900 | Hardesty | Mar 1971 | A |
3598693 | Hardesty | Aug 1971 | A |
4121832 | Ebbing | Oct 1978 | A |
4664383 | Aizawa | May 1987 | A |
5454563 | Nagamoto | Oct 1995 | A |
5601498 | Antonious | Feb 1997 | A |
5692970 | Nelson | Dec 1997 | A |
5843568 | Masui | Dec 1998 | A |
6146286 | Masuda | Nov 2000 | A |
7549933 | Kumamoto | Jun 2009 | B2 |
9050506 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9283448 | Sander | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9296175 | Tamaguchi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9403071 | Sander | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9468816 | Barelmann | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20030161989 | Funakoshi | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20070270237 | Tavares et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090011851 | Tanio | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20140357398 | Yamamoto | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160184662 | Barelmann | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160332040 | Lafortune | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 11, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/025854, filed Apr. 4, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200398118 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14724373 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15812375 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16432776 | Jun 2019 | US |
Child | 17009637 | US | |
Parent | 15812375 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 16432776 | US |