This disclosure relates generally to the field of golf clubs. More particularly, it relates to a golf club head with at least one sole rail.
Many factors can influence the effectiveness of a golf shot. One of the most important of these factors is the speed at which the club head strikes the golf ball. This club head speed at impact not only substantially dictates how far the golf shot will travel, but its predictability and repeatability are of utmost importance for a golfer to hit a shot at a desired distance. Another factor influencing the effectiveness of the golf shot is the trajectory at which the golf ball leaves the club face following impact. This trajectory has a substantial impact on the ball's distance of travel, ability to clear hazards, and movement once having returned to the ground surface.
One of the largest influences on the speed at which the club head strikes the golf ball is the effort exerted by the golfer, i.e., how hard the golfer swings. Large influences on the trajectory of the golf ball are the loft angle of the club head itself as well as the angle at which the club head attacks the ball during the swing. But interaction between the club head and the turf can also result in an unanticipated loss of club head speed prior to impact with the golf ball, and it can also result in de-lofting, i.e., flattening, of the club head prior to impact. This may lead to the aforementioned changes in and adverse declines in predictability of shot distance and golf ball trajectory following impact. This is especially true with respect to hybrid or utility-type golf club heads, which are often employed in adverse turf conditions such as the rough, which may offer more resistance to the club head and thereby substantially reduce speed retention, and which club types are generally relied on for longer golf shots than say irons and wedges.
A golf club head has thus been sought that improves club head speed retention throughout the swing and prevents loss of this speed due to turf interaction. This goal may be achieved by one or more aspects of the present disclosure, in which the sole contour of the club head, e.g., its width and leading edge shape, may be designed for this specific purpose by way of optimization through numerous iterations.
A golf club head according to one or more aspects of the present disclosure may thus, when oriented in a reference position, comprise: a striking face; a top portion; and a sole portion opposite the top portion. The sole portion may in turn comprise a leading edge, a trailing edge, at least one sole rail generally elongate in a front-to-rear direction, and a sole contact point located on the at least one sole rail. And in a virtual vertical plane extending in the front-to-rear direction and passing through the sole contact point, the sole portion may include a sole length Ls measured in the front-to-rear direction from the leading edge to the trailing edge, and the sole contact point may be spaced rearwardly from the leading edge by a distance D1 no greater than 0.8*Ls.
A golf club head in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure may, when oriented in a reference position, also comprise: a striking face; a top portion; and a sole portion opposite the top portion. The sole portion may in turn comprise a leading edge, a trailing edge, a first sole rail generally elongate in a front-to-rear direction, a second sole rail generally elongate in the front-to-rear direction, and a recess formed between the first sole rail and the second sole rail. The recess may have a step-down portion defined in the front-to-rear direction.
And a golf club head in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure may, when oriented in a reference position, yet further comprise: a striking face; a top portion; and a sole portion opposite the top portion. The sole portion may comprise a leading edge, a trailing edge, at least one sole rail generally elongate in a front-to-rear direction, and a sole contact point located on the at least one sole rail. And in a virtual vertical plane extending in the front-to-rear direction and passing through the sole contact point, the leading edge may include a height H1 of no less than 5 mm; the sole may further comprise a first radius of curvature R1 at a first location spaced rearward from the leading edge by no less than 3 mm and a second radius of curvature R2 at a second location rearward of the first location; and R2 may be no less than 10*R1.
These and other features and advantages of the golf club head according to the various aspects of the present disclosure will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description, drawings, and appended claims. The description and drawings described below are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any manner. It is also to be understood that, for the purposes of this application, any disclosed range encompasses a disclosure of each and every sub-range thereof. For example, the range of 1-5 encompasses a disclosure of at least 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 2-3, 2-4, 2-5, 3-4, 3-5, and 4-5. Further, the end points of any disclosed range encompass a disclosure of those exact end points as well as of values at approximately or at about those endpoints.
Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Shown in
The club head 100 may include a front portion 110, which has a striking wall including a striking face 112 for contacting a golf ball, and a rear portion 120. The striking face 112 may include a face center 114, which is the point on the striking face 112 that is equidistant from the striking face periphery in both the horizontal direction and in the vertical direction, as set out in the United States Golf Association's Procedure for Measuring the Flexibility of a Golf Club Head (Revision 2.0, Mar. 25, 2005), in which “face center” is described as identifiable using a designated template for such purpose. The club head 100 may further include a toe portion 130, a heel portion 140, a sole portion 150, and a top portion, or crown, 160. The heel portion 140 may include a hosel 142 configured to receive and secure a shaft (not shown) of the golf club. And the club head 100 may include a club head center of gravity at the location 170.
The top portion 160 of the club head 100 may include a raised peripheral portion 162, which may provide additional structural integrity to the club head. This portion 162 may also increase, especially relative to prior club heads, the club head 100's moment of inertia (“MOI”) about a vertical axis passing through the center of gravity 170, i.e., Izz. The top portion 160 may also include a step-down 164 that further lowers the center of gravity 170 and thus locates the sweet spot, which is a normal projection of the center of gravity 170 on the striking face 112, in a location more proximate the intended, e.g., average, impact point of the golf ball and the golf club head 100. A weight pad (not shown) may also be located on the interior of the sole portion 150 to yet further increase the MOI and reduce the height of the center of gravity for similar purposes. And being a utility-type club head, the loft angle, i.e., the angle formed between a virtual vertical hosel plane containing an axis of the hosel 142 and a striking face plane substantially parallel to the striking face 112, of the club head 100 may preferably be no greater than 26°. More preferably, this loft angle may be between 14° and 26°, and even more preferably between 18° and 24°. In embodiments where the striking face includes a bulge and/or roll, the virtual striking face plane may be considered to be a plane tangent to the face center of the striking face.
As perhaps best shown in
The edges 152 and 154 may define therebetween a sole length 156, which may otherwise be indicated by “Ls.” The sole length 156 may preferably be no less than 35 mm, more preferably no less than 45 mm, and even more preferably, it may be between 45 mm and 65 mm. The setback length 180 of the sole contact point 158 from the leading edge 152 in the front-to-rear direction, otherwise referred to as “D1,” may also be defined. For example, the setback length 180 may preferably be no greater than 0.8*Ls, more preferably no greater than 0.5*Ls, and even more preferably no greater than 0.25*Ls. In terms of absolute value, the setback length 180 may be between 5 mm and 15 mm and even more preferably between 8 mm and 12 mm. And as also shown in
Returning to
In the foregoing discussion, the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary aspects thereof. However, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these exemplary aspects without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing discussion and the accompanying drawings are to be regarded as merely illustrative of the present invention rather than as limiting its scope in any manner.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/502,631, filed Jul. 3, 2019. The entire content of that prior application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3985363 | Jepson et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4332388 | Crow | Jun 1982 | A |
5398935 | Katayama | Mar 1995 | A |
D361356 | Feche | Aug 1995 | S |
D362039 | Lin | Sep 1995 | S |
5497995 | Swisshelm | Mar 1996 | A |
5611741 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
D410057 | Ortiz | May 1999 | S |
5967902 | Greenquist et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6007433 | Helmstetter et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6027416 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6146287 | Rugge et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
D435075 | Ota | Dec 2000 | S |
RE37647 | Wolf | Apr 2002 | E |
D457583 | Olsavsky et al. | May 2002 | S |
6663503 | Kenmi | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7273419 | Evans et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7618330 | Krewalk | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7766765 | Oyama | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7824277 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8021247 | Brolly | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8328658 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8690706 | Stites et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8771097 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8986131 | Stites et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9061185 | Dolezel et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
10143900 | Harrington et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10512827 | Hobbs et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
D926901 | Parsons et al. | Aug 2021 | S |
11998810 | Day et al. | Jun 2024 | B1 |
20110077101 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120289361 | Beach et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130053163 | Motokawa | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130072319 | Dolezel et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140235368 | Burnett et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20170043222 | Stokke et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180311544 | Oyler et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20200001146 | Morales et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Jan. 31, 2024 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/328,157. |
Aug. 8, 2024 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/328,157. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230218954 A1 | Jul 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16502631 | Jul 2019 | US |
Child | 18122398 | US |