1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a golf club, and, more particularly, to a golf club head having a top line recess with a light-weight insert.
2. Description of the Related Art
Golf club heads come in many different forms and makes, such as wood- or metal-type, iron-type (including wedge-type club heads), utility- or specialty-type, and putter-type. Each of these styles has a prescribed function and make-up. The present invention relates to golf club heads that have a predominantly solid material area located near the top of the club head.
Iron-type and utility-type golf club heads generally include a front or striking face, a top line, and a sole. The front face interfaces with and strikes the golf ball. A plurality of grooves, sometimes referred to as “score lines,” is provided on the face to assist in imparting spin to the ball. The top line is generally configured to have a particular look to the golfer and to provide structural rigidity for the striking face. A portion of the face may have an area with a different type of surface treatment that extends fractionally beyond the score line extents. Some club heads have the surface treatment wrap onto the top line. The sole of the golf club is particularly important to the golf shot because it contacts and interacts with the ground during the swing.
In conventional sets of iron-type golf clubs, each club includes a shaft with a club head attached to one end and a grip attached to the other end. The club head includes a face for striking a golf ball. The angle between the face and a vertical plane is called the loft angle.
The set generally includes irons that are designated number 3 through number 9, and a pitching wedge. One or more additional long irons, such as those designated number 1 or number 2, and wedges, such as a gap wedge, a sand wedge, and a lob wedge, may optionally be included with the set. Alternatively, the set may include irons that are designated number 4 through number 9, a pitching wedge, and a gap wedge. Each iron has a shaft length that usually decreases through the set as the loft for each club head increases from the long irons to the short irons. The overall weight of each club head increases through the set as the shaft length decreases from the long irons to the short irons. To properly ensure that each club has a similar feel or balance during a golf swing, a measurement known as “swingweight” is often used as a criterion to define the club head weight and the shaft length. Because each of the clubs within the set is typically designed to have the same swingweight value for each different lofted club head or given shaft length, the weight of the club head is confined to a particular range.
The length of the shaft, along with the club head loft, moment of inertia, and center of gravity location, impart various performance characteristics to the ball's launch conditions upon impact and dictate the golf ball's launch angle, spin rate, flight trajectory, and the distance the ball will travel. Flight distance generally increases with a decrease in loft angle and an increase in club length. However, difficulty of use also increases with a decrease in loft angle and an increase in club length.
Iron-type golf clubs generally can be divided into three categories: blades and muscle backs, conventional cavity backs, and modern multi-material cavity backs. Blades are traditional clubs with a substantially uniform appearance from the sole to the top line, although there may be some tapering from sole to top line. Similarly, muscle backs are substantially uniform, but have extra material on the back thereof in the form of a rib that can be used to lower the club head center of gravity. A club head with a lower center of gravity than the ball center of gravity facilitates getting the golf ball airborne. Because blade and muscle back designs have a small sweet spot, which is a term that refers to the area of the face that results in a desirable golf shot upon striking a golf ball, these designs are relatively difficult to wield and are typically only used by skilled golfers. However, these designs allow the skilled golfer to work the ball and shape the golf shot as desired.
Cavity backs move some of the club mass to the perimeter of the club by providing a hollow or cavity in the back of the club, opposite the striking face. The perimeter weighting created by the cavity increases the club's moment of inertia, which is a measurement of the club's resistance to torque, for example the torque resulting from an off-center hit. This produces a more forgiving club with a larger sweet spot. Having a larger sweet spot increases the ease of use. The decrease in club head mass resulting from the cavity also allows the size of the club face to be increased, further enlarging the sweet spot. These clubs are easier to hit than blades and muscle backs, and are therefore more readily usable by less-skilled and beginner golfers.
Modern multi-material cavity backs are the latest attempt by golf club designers to make cavity backs more forgiving and easier to hit. Some of these designs replace certain areas of the club head, such as the striking face or sole, with a second material that can be either heavier or lighter than the first material. These designs can also contain deep undercuts, which stem from the rear cavity, or secondary cavities. By incorporating materials of varying densities or providing cavities and undercuts, mass can be freed up to increase the overall size of the club head, expand the sweet spot, enhance the moment of inertia, and/or optimize the club head center of gravity location. However, due to construction limitations or requirements, some of these designs inadvertently thicken the top portion of the club head. Still, these improvements make the multi-material cavity back design the easiest of all styles to hit, and are ideally suited for the less adroit or novice golfer.
As mentioned above, producing a low center of gravity in a club head increases its playability. One of the ways to lower the center of gravity is to lower the face profile of the head. However, this produces a club head with a bad aesthetic appearance. Another method of reducing the club's center of gravity is to reduce the height of the hosel. However, there are disadvantages to reducing the hosel height, such as: reduced moment of inertia (since hosel mass is far away from the center of gravity), shaft-bonding concerns, and the inability to customize the club head via bending for loft/lie. In addition, many golfers dislike the appearance of a club head that has a very small hosel.
The present invention relates to a golf club head having a body defining a front surface, a top line, a sole, a back, a heel, a toe, and a hosel. The top portion of the club head, preferably the top line, contains a recess therein located between the heel and the toe, and extending toward the sole. Additional recesses, such as a toe recess and a heel recess, may also be provided in the top portion of the club head. These recesses remove material from the club head, allowing the opportunity to do one or more of the following: increase the size of the overall club head, expand the size of the club head sweet spot, lower the club head center of gravity, and/or produce a greater moment of inertia measured about a vertical or horizontal axis passing through the club head center of gravity. The golf club head of the present invention preferably is an iron-type, a utility-type, or a putter-type golf club head.
Inserts formed of a secondary material may be placed within the recesses. These inserts have a density that is less than the density of the club head body, and the inserts preferably are light-weight inserts. This allows the mass removed by the recesses to be replaced in more desirous locations on the club head, such as in the perimeter and/or toward the sole. The inserts may contain one or more dampening materials, such as a viscoelastic material, which have the added benefit of dissipating vibrations that may be created during the golf shot. Nylon is another preferred insert material. The incorporation of these secondary materials provides improved feel and improved weight distribution, enhancing performance of the club, while still maintaining an aesthetically pleasing overall head shape. The incorporation of these secondary materials also improves wearing of the heads over time since the viscoelastic material covers the top-toe area of the club, which is primarily responsible for marks on the head due to club-to-club impacts as the clubs rest in a player's bag.
Instead of a recess, an extension may be provided at the top portion of the club head where relatively high density metallic material has been removed. The insert is attached to the extension.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters reference like elements, and wherein:
Other than in the operating examples, or unless otherwise expressly specified, all of the numerical ranges, amounts, values, and percentages, such as those for amounts of materials, moments of inertias, center of gravity locations, and others in the following portion of the specification, may be read as if prefaced by the word “about” even though the term “about” may not expressly appear with the value, amount, or range. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following description and claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in any specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Furthermore, when numerical ranges of varying scope are set forth herein, it is contemplated that any combination of these values inclusive of the recited values may be used.
The top portion of the club head 1 contains a recess 20 therein, located between the heel 15 and the toe 16 and extending toward the sole 13. Preferably, the recess 20 is located in the top line 12 of the club head 1 and extends along the top line 12 from approximately 10% to approximately 95% of the top line length. The top line length LTL is defined as the distance along the top line 12 from a point P1 to a point P2. Point P1 is defined as the intersection of the golf club head 1 and a plane that is offset 0.2 inch (L1) from and parallel to a plane defined by the X-axis and the Z-axis tangent to the toe 16 at the toe's furthest point from the origin O along the Y-axis. Point P2 is defined as the uppermost intersection of the club head 1 and a plane that is parallel to the plane formed by the shaft centerline CLSH and the X-axis offset a distance of 0.3 inch (L2) in a direction closer to the toe 16. The recess 20 removes material from the club head 1, which can be redistributed to other areas of the club head 1 to do one or more of the following: increase the overall size of the club head 1, expand the size of the club head sweet spot, reposition the club head center of gravity, and/or produce a greater moment of inertia (MOI) measured about either an axis parallel to the Y-axis or Z-axis passing through the club head center of gravity. Inertia is a property of matter by which a body remains at rest or in uniform motion unless acted upon by some external force. MOI is a measure of the resistance of a body to angular acceleration about a given axis, and is equal to the sum of the products of each element of mass in the body and the square of the element's distance from the axis. Thus, as the distance from the axis increases, the MOI increases, making the club more forgiving for off-center hits since less energy is lost during impact from club head twisting. Moving or rearranging mass to the club head perimeter enlarges the sweet spot and produces a more forgiving club. Moving as much mass as possible to the extreme outermost areas of the club head 1, such as the heel 15, the toe 16, or the sole 13, maximizes the opportunity to enlarge the sweet spot or produce a greater MOI. The recess 20 preferably has a volume of approximately 0.001 in3 to approximately 0.2 in3. In relative terms, the recess 20 preferably has a volume that is from approximately 0.5% to approximately 10% of the volume of the body 10. The recess 20 preferably has a depth D from approximately 0.01 inch to approximately 0.25 inch, which may be a constant depth or a varying depth.
An insert 30 may be positioned within the recess 20. The insert 30, which may be either a preformed insert or cast in place within the recess 20, may be configured to matingly correspond to the recess 20. That is, the insert 30 may be formed and configured to match the contours of the recess 20 and to substantially fill the recess 20. Alternatively, the insert 30 fills only a portion of the recess 20. The insert 30 has a density that is less than the density of the club head body 10. Since the mass of the insert 30 is less than the mass removed by the recess 20, the extra mass may be replaced in more desirous locations on the club head 1. These locations may include, for example, the club head perimeter and/or the sole 13. Alternatively, no additional mass is added to the club head 1; only the recess 20 and the insert 30 are used to enhance the playing characteristics of the golf club. The insert 30 preferably has a density from approximately 0.5 g/cm3 to approximately 5 g/cm3, and is preferably less than the body density by at least 3 g/cm3. The net effect of creating the recess 20 and adding the insert 30 lowers the club head center of gravity (CG1 in
The insert 30 may contain one or more dampening materials, which diminish vibrations in the club head, including vibrations generated during an off-center hit. Preferred dampening materials include those materials known as thermoplastic or thermoset polymers, such as rubber, urethane, polyurethane, butadiene, polybutadiene, silicone, and combinations thereof. Energy is transferred from the club to the ball during impact. Some energy, however, is lost due to vibration of the head caused by the impact. These vibrations produce undesirable sensations in both feel and sound to the user. Because the viscoelastic dampening material of the insert 30 is in direct contact with the metal club head (the vibrating body), it serves to dampen these vibrations, improving sound and feel. Typical hardness values for the insert 30 may include from 80 Shore A to 50 Shore D. Typical densities for the insert 30 may include from 1.2-2 g/cm3.
It is possible that there are variations in size of the metallic portions of the club heads 1, 2 caused during forming and polishing. These variations typically are larger than the variations in size due to molding viscoelastic materials of the inserts 30. To aid in hiding any discrepancy between the two portions of the club head, a groove 32 may be formed in the insert 30 the edges that are visible to the user once the two pieces have been put together. This groove 32 may be created simultaneously with the rest of the insert 30, or as a secondary step. The preferred width and depth of the groove 32 are 1 mm or less.
In the illustrated example of
A body's center of gravity is determined by its weight distribution. Mass added or removed directly on the center of gravity will have no effect on the center of gravity's location. In contrast, mass added or removed far away from the center of gravity will have the greatest effect on moving the center of gravity. Removing mass from the highest areas of a club head will have the greatest effect on lowering the center of gravity. Adding the mass removed from the high areas to the bottom of the club head will further lower the center of gravity. The top line area and top-of-hosel area are the two highest vertical areas in relation to the ground plane on an iron-type head (when the head is at the address position). By removing the top line portion of the face from the casting and replacing it with a lightweight viscoelastic piece, anywhere from 20-50 grams are removed from the top of the head, depending upon the design of the viscoelastic piece. That weight is redistributed to the bottom portion of the club, lowering the center of gravity even further versus that same club head constructed entirely of a metallic material, such as steel.
MOI is also a property that is affected by mass distribution. Bodies that have mass distributed far from the center of gravity have higher MOI's about their center of gravity than bodies that have mass concentrated near their center of gravity. Removing the mass from the top of the face lowers the MOI about the center of gravity with respect to certain axes. The axis of rotation that relates to an iron's forgiveness is rotation in the heel-toe direction about the center of gravity—an axis parallel to the Z-axis. A higher MOI about this axis indicates greater resistance to twisting on off-center hits and, thus, more forgiveness. By adding the mass removed from the top line 12 back into the low-heel and low-toe areas of the club head, the reduction in MOI in the heel-toe direction due to removal of metallic material from the top line 12 is minimized.
Table 1 shows a comparison of center of gravity locations and MOI's for a 6-iron having a urethane insert 30 as shown in
CGx, CGy, and CGz are the x-, y-, and z-components of the center of gravity location, respectively. Ixx, Iyy, and Izz are the MOI's about the x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively. k is the spring constant.
Use of the insert 30 pictured in
The club head 4 of
A third insert 48 may also be included with the club head 4. This third insert 48 preferably is coupled to the back 14 of the club head 4, opposite the front surface 11. The insert 48 preferably is formed of a viscoelastic material, and thus it damps unwanted vibrations via free-layer damping. The insert 48 may be coupled to the club head 4 in any known manner, such as via an adhesive. The insert 48, as well as the other inserts described herein, may also inherently possess adhesive properties such that it may coupled directly to the club head without the need of a separate adhesive material.
In addition to removing mass from the central portion of the top line 12, additional material, and therefore mass, may be removed from heel and toe portions of the top line 12.
The inserts 30, 35, 37 are retained within the respective top line recesses in known manner, such as through use of an adhesive or epoxy. Alternatively, the inserts 30, 35, 37 may be molded in place, known as “co-molding.” To ensure a smooth top line surface along the entire length of the top line, the top line, with the inserts 30, 35, 37 in place, may be polished. This may be performed, for example, through wet sanding or grinding, which facilitates simultaneous removal of both metallic and polymer/nylon materials. Preferably, the toe and heel recesses are spaced from the central recess by portions of the club head body. This helps ensure that structural integrity of the club head is retained.
These toe and heel top line recesses work in conjunction with the central top line recess to remove unneeded club head mass from the upper portion of the club head, which may be repositioned as added mass or weight members in other, more beneficial locations of the club head while keeping the overall club head mass and weight constant. For example, mass may be added to heel and toe portions of the sole, such as by including additional material forming the club head body 10 or by incorporating weight inserts. This beneficially further lowers the club head center of gravity, making the resulting golf club easier to use. Furthermore, repositioning of the “saved” mass and weight to toe and heel portions of the club head further increase the club head MOI, making the club head more stable and forgiving, also increasing the playability of the resulting golf club.
In addition to the first rear insert 52, the club head 6 further includes a second rear insert 54. This insert 54 is positioned atop the first insert 52, and includes a notch at its lower end to contact and overlap the first insert 52. As shown in
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar references in the context of describing the invention are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein.
As used herein, directional references such as rear, front, lower, etc. are made with respect to the club head when grounded at the address position. See, for example,
While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by-way of example only, and not of limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus the present invention should not be limited by the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents. Furthermore, while certain advantages of the invention have been described herein, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/266,172 filed on Nov. 4, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,524,250, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/843,622 filed on May 12, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,481,718, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1319233 | Mattern | Oct 1919 | A |
1534600 | Mattern | Apr 1925 | A |
2429351 | Fetterolf | Oct 1947 | A |
3084940 | Cissel | Apr 1963 | A |
3881733 | Csernits | May 1975 | A |
3970236 | Rogers | Jul 1976 | A |
4027885 | Rogers | Jun 1977 | A |
4340230 | Churchward | Jul 1982 | A |
4398965 | Campau | Aug 1983 | A |
4523759 | Igarashi | Jun 1985 | A |
4607846 | Perkins | Aug 1986 | A |
4687205 | Tominaga et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4811950 | Kobayashi | Mar 1989 | A |
4874171 | Ezaki et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4928972 | Nakanishi et al. | May 1990 | A |
4957294 | Long | Sep 1990 | A |
D321920 | Parente et al. | Nov 1991 | S |
5110131 | Long | May 1992 | A |
5221087 | Fenton et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
D339183 | Stites, III | Sep 1993 | S |
D343216 | Chorne | Jan 1994 | S |
5303922 | Lo | Apr 1994 | A |
5316298 | Hutin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5377979 | Long | Jan 1995 | A |
5377985 | Ohnishi | Jan 1995 | A |
5413336 | Iwanaga | May 1995 | A |
5492327 | Biafore, Jr. | Feb 1996 | A |
5544885 | Besnard et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5564705 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5586947 | Hutin | Dec 1996 | A |
5616088 | Aizawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5643112 | Basnard et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669826 | Chang et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5772527 | Liu | Jun 1998 | A |
6042486 | Gallagher | Mar 2000 | A |
6080069 | Long | Jun 2000 | A |
RE36950 | Allen | Nov 2000 | E |
6302807 | Rohrer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306048 | McCabe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332848 | Long et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6443857 | Chuang | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478690 | Helmstetter et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6592469 | Gilbert | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6688989 | Best | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702693 | Bamber | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6769998 | Clausen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773361 | Lee | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6814674 | Clausen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6902495 | Pergande | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921344 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7048648 | Breier et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7303486 | Imamoto | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7481718 | Soracco | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7524250 | Soracco et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7621822 | Roach | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20020042307 | Deshmukh | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020094883 | Chuang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107087 | Fagot | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165041 | Takeda | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030032499 | Wahl et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045372 | Vrska | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030092502 | Pergande et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125129 | Saksun | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040023730 | Nagai et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040116200 | Helmstetter et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050096151 | Hou et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050277484 | Reed et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277485 | Hou et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025234 | Nicolette et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052184 | Soracco | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070129166 | Shimazaki et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080015051 | Roach et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090221382 | Soracco | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100056297 | Roach | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
04-082576 | Mar 1992 | JP |
07-031697 | Feb 1995 | JP |
07-213656 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08-057088 | Mar 1996 | JP |
3032837 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09-173513 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-225075 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2000-153008 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2003-093550 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2006-300589 | Nov 2006 | JP |
3145482 | Sep 2008 | JP |
WO 2005-082062 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080051220 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11266172 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11896237 | US | |
Parent | 10843622 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 11266172 | US |