The present invention relates to a golf club, and, more particularly, to a golf club head having a top line recess with an insert. In particular, the golf club head of the present invention is directed to a design including a top line with a recess and an optional insert that extend along at least a portion of the top line around the toe. In addition, the present invention relates to a set of golf clubs with a recess and insert in the top line where the higher loft angle clubs have a heavier or higher specific gravity insert and the lower loft angle clubs have a lighter or lower specific gravity insert.
Golf club heads come in many different forms and makes, such as wood- or metal-type, iron-type (including wedge-type club heads), utility- or specialty-type, and putter-type. Each of these styles has a prescribed function and make-up. For example, iron-type and utility-type golf club heads generally include a front or striking face, a top line, and a sole. The front face interfaces with and strikes the golf ball. The angle between the face and a vertical plane is called the loft angle.
A plurality of grooves, sometimes referred to as “score lines,” may be provided on the face to assist in imparting spin to the ball. A portion of the face may have an area with a different type of surface treatment that extends fractionally beyond the score line extents. In addition, the top line is generally configured to have a particular look to the golfer and to provide structural rigidity for the striking face. Some club heads have the surface treatment wrap onto the top line. The sole of the golf club is particularly important to the golf shot because it contacts and interacts with the ground during the swing.
In conventional sets of iron-type golf clubs, the club heads are attached to a shaft, which has a grip attached to the other end. The set generally includes irons that are designated number 3 through number 9, and a pitching wedge. Higher loft angle clubs are generally called “short irons” because the higher loft angle results in a shorter overall shot distance. Lower loft angle clubs are generally referred to as “long irons” because these types of clubs usually result in a longer overall distance. Each iron has a shaft length that usually decreases through the set as the loft for each club head increases from the long irons to the short irons. One or more additional long irons, such as those designated number 1 or number 2, and wedges, such as a gap wedge, a sand wedge, and a lob wedge, may optionally be included with the set. Alternatively, the set may include irons that are designated number 4 through number 9, a pitching wedge, and a gap wedge.
The overall weight of each club head generally increases through the set as the shaft length decreases from the long irons to the short irons. To properly ensure that each club has a similar feel or balance during a golf swing, a measurement known as “swingweight” is often used as a criterion to define the club head weight and the shaft length. Because each of the clubs within the set is typically designed to have the same swingweight value for each different lofted club head or given shaft length, the weight of the club head is confined to a particular range.
The length of the shaft, along with the club head loft, moment of inertia, and center of gravity location, impart various performance characteristics to the ball's launch conditions upon impact and dictate the golf ball's launch angle, spin rate, flight trajectory, and the distance the ball will travel. For example, flight distance generally increases with a decrease in loft angle and an increase in club length. However, difficulty of use also increases with a decrease in loft angle and an increase in club length.
Iron-type golf clubs generally can be divided into three categories: blades and muscle backs, conventional cavity backs, and modern multi-material cavity backs. Blades are traditional clubs with a substantially uniform appearance from the sole to the top line, although there may be some tapering from sole to top line. Similarly, muscle backs are substantially uniform, but have extra material on the back thereof in the form of a rib that can be used to lower the club head center of gravity. A club head with a lower center of gravity than the ball center of gravity facilitates getting the golf ball airborne. Because blade and muscle back designs have a small sweet spot, which is a term that refers to the area of the face that results in a desirable golf shot upon striking a golf ball, these designs are relatively difficult to wield and are typically only used by skilled golfers. However, these designs allow the skilled golfer to work the ball and shape the golf shot as desired.
Cavity backs move some of the club mass to the perimeter of the club by providing a hollow or cavity in the back of the club, opposite the striking face. The perimeter weighting created by the cavity increases the club's moment of inertia (a measurement of the club's resistance to torque), thus producing a more forgiving club with a larger sweet spot. The decrease in club head mass resulting from the cavity also allows the size of the club face to be increased, further enlarging the sweet spot. As such, these clubs are easier to hit than blades and muscle backs, and are therefore more readily usable by less-skilled and beginner golfers.
Modern multi-material cavity backs are the latest attempt by golf club designers to make cavity backs more forgiving and easier to hit. Some of these designs replace certain areas of the club head, such as the striking face or sole, with a second material that can be either heavier or lighter than the first material. These designs can also contain deep undercuts, which stem from the rear cavity, or secondary cavities. By incorporating materials of varying densities or providing cavities and undercuts, mass can be freed up to increase the overall size of the club head, expand the sweet spot, enhance the moment of inertia, and/or optimize the club head center of gravity location. However, due to construction limitations or requirements, some of these designs inadvertently thicken the top portion of the club head. Still, these improvements make the multi-material cavity back design the easiest of all styles to hit, and are ideally suited for the less adroit or novice golfer.
As mentioned above, producing a low center of gravity in a club head increases its playability. One of the ways to lower the center of gravity is to lower the face profile of the head. However, this produces a club head with a bad aesthetic appearance. Another method of reducing the club's center of gravity is to reduce the height of the hosel. However, there are disadvantages to reducing the hosel height, such as: reduced moment of inertia (since hosel mass is far away from the center of gravity); shaft-bonding concerns; and the inability to customize the club head via bending for loft/lie. In addition, many golfers dislike the appearance of a club head that has a very small hosel.
As such, there remains a need in the art for a club head that has a modified top line such that the resulting club has a desirable center of gravity location and remains aesthetically appealing to the golfer.
The present invention relates to a golf club head having a body defining a front surface, a top line, a sole, a back, a heel, a toe, and a hosel. The top portion of the club head, preferably the top line, contains a recess therein located between the heel and the toe, and extending toward the sole. Additional recesses, such as a toe recess and a heel recess, may also be provided in the top portion of the club head. In addition, the recess may extend along the top line from the heel around the toe of the top line. The use of such recesses remove material from the club head, allowing the opportunity to do one or more of the following: increase the size of the overall club head, expand the size of the club head sweet spot, lower the club head center of gravity, and/or produce a greater moment of inertia measured about a vertical or horizontal axis passing through the club head center of gravity. The golf club head of the present invention preferably is an iron-type, a utility-type, or a putter-type golf club head.
Inserts formed of a secondary material may be placed within the recesses. In one embodiment, these inserts have a density that is less than the density of the material used to form the club head body, and the inserts preferably are light-weight inserts. This allows the mass removed by the recesses to be replaced in more desirous locations on the club head, such as in the perimeter and/or toward the sole. The inserts may contain one or more dampening materials, such as a viscoelastic material, which have the added benefit of dissipating vibrations that may be created during the golf shot. Nylon is one example of a suitable insert material according to the invention. The incorporation of such dampening materials provides improved feel and improved weight distribution, enhancing performance of the club, while still maintaining an aesthetically pleasing overall head shape. The incorporation of the dampening materials also improves wearing of the heads over time since the viscoelastic material covers the top-toe area of the club, which is primarily responsible for marks on the head due to club-to-club impacts as the clubs rest in a player's bag.
In another aspect of the invention, the inserts extend to areas under the top line, thus allowing for the removal of even more mass from the top portion of the club head while permitting traditional methods of club head adjustment. For example, the lie and loft are typically adjusted using a device that clamps down on the top line. However, by setting some of the insert below the metallic top line, the clamp will not damage or disfigure the top line. The lightweight insert allows for mass to be removed from the top line and redistributed to other areas of the club to optimize center of gravity and moment of inertia, as well as expand the sweet spot of the club head.
In another embodiment, the insert is formed of a material that has a greater density than the material used to form the body of the club head. In this aspect of the invention, the present invention contemplates a set of golf clubs where the higher loft clubs include a recess with a high specific gravity insert in order to increase the center of gravity. In this aspect of the invention, the lower loft angle clubs (long irons) may have a lower center of gravity than the higher loft angle clubs (short irons). In particular, the long irons are equipped with a low specific gravity top line insert and the short irons are equipped with a high specific gravity top line insert.
Instead of a recess, an extension may be provided at the top portion of the club head where relatively high density metallic material has been removed. The insert may then be attached to the extension.
The present invention is also directed to an iron-type golf club head, including:
a body defining a top line including a recess, wherein the body is formed of a first material with a first specific gravity;
an insert positioned within the top line recess, wherein the top line insert is formed of a second material with a second specific gravity,
wherein the second specific gravity is different than the first specific gravity, and wherein the club head satisfies the relationship:
Izz≧CGz*170
where Izz is the rotational moment of inertia about a vertical axis and has units of g/cm2 and CGz is the center of gravity and has units of mm.
In one embodiment, the golf club head further includes a sole including a heel recess and a toe recess and a weight insert positioned within the sole heel recess and the sole toe recess, wherein the weight insert formed of a third material with a third specific gravity. The third specific gravity may be at least about 7. In one embodiment, the third specific gravity may be at least about 9. In another embodiment, the second specific gravity may be greater than the first specific gravity by at least about 3.
In this aspect of the invention, the club head may satisfy the relationship Izz≧CGz*SG*17, wherein SG is the second specific gravity. In one embodiment, the second specific gravity is less than the first specific gravity by at least about 3.
In one embodiment, the club head satisfies the relationship Izz≧CGz*SG*130, wherein SG is the second specific gravity. In another embodiment, the Izz is at least about 2500 g·cm2. In yet another embodiment, the second specific gravity is less than about 1.5. In still another embodiment, the second specific gravity is greater than about 9. The recess may extend from the heel around the top line-toe transition.
The present invention is also directed to a set of iron type golf clubs including at least one club including a first club head including: a body defining a top line including a recess, wherein the body is formed of a first material with a first specific gravity; an insert positioned within the recess, wherein the insert has a second specific gravity, and wherein the second specific gravity is less than the first specific gravity; and at least one club including a second club head including: a body defining a top line including a recess, wherein the body is formed of a third material with a third specific gravity; an insert positioned within the recess, wherein the insert has a fourth specific gravity, and wherein the fourth specific gravity is greater than the third specific gravity.
In one embodiment, at least one of the first club head and the second club head satisfy the relationship:
Izz≧CGz*170
where Izz is the rotational moment of inertia about a vertical axis and has units of g/cm2 and CGz is the center of gravity and has units of mm. In this aspect of the invention, the Izz of at least one of the first club head and second club head may be at least about 2500 g·cm2.
In one embodiment, both of the first and second club heads satisfy the relationship: Izz≧CGz*170, where Izz is the rotational moment of inertia about a vertical axis and has units of g/cm2 and CGz is the center of gravity and has units of mm. In this aspect of the invention, the Izz of both the first and the second club heads is at least about 2500 g·cm2. In one embodiment, the second club head satisfies the relationship Izz≧CGz*SG*17, wherein SG is the fourth specific gravity. In another embodiment, the first club head satisfies the relationship Izz≧CGz*SG*130, wherein SG is the second specific gravity. In addition, at least one of the recesses in the first club head and second club may extend from the heel around the top line-toe transition.
Further features and advantages of the invention can be ascertained from the following detailed description that is provided in connection with the drawing(s) described below:
The present invention is directed to a golf club head with a top line insert. The top line insert may be fashioned in a variety of ways according to the invention. For example, in one embodiment, a recess and optional insert is located in the top line of the club head and extends along the top line. In another embodiment, the recess and optional insert extends around the toe of the club head. The insert may be formed of a variety of materials. For example, the insert may be lighter than the body of the club head to adjust the center of gravity downward. Alternatively, the insert may be heavier than the body of the club head to adjust the center of gravity upward. Each of the various embodiments are discussed in greater detail below and demonstrated with representative drawings.
The recess and optional insert may be used in a variety of club heads. For example, the club head may be a long iron, a short iron, or a set including both long and short irons where the recess and optional insert is tailored to adjust the club head center of gravity and other club head properties such as moment of inertia. In addition, the present invention is contemplated for use with utility-type club heads and putter club heads.
As shown in
As known to those of ordinary skill in the art, MOI is a measure of the resistance of a body to angular acceleration about a given axis, and is equal to the sum of the products of each element of mass in the body and the square of the element's distance from the axis. Thus, as the distance from the axis increases, the MOI increases, making the club more forgiving for off-center hits since less energy is lost during impact from club head twisting. Thus, moving or rearranging mass to the club head perimeter enlarges the sweet spot and produces a more forgiving club. Moving as much mass as possible to the extreme outermost areas of the club head 1, such as the heel 15, the toe 16, or the sole 13, maximizes the opportunity to enlarge the sweet spot or produce a greater MOI.
In one embodiment, the recess 20 is located in the top line 12 of the club head 1 and extends along the top line 12 from about 10 percent to about 95 percent of the top line length. The top line length LTL is defined as the distance along the top line 12 from a point P1 to a point P2. Point P1 is defined as the intersection of the golf club head 1 and a plane that is offset 5.08 mm (L1) from and parallel to a plane defined by the X-axis and the Z-axis tangent to the toe 16 at the toe's furthest point from the origin O along the Y-axis. Point P2 is defined as the uppermost intersection of the club head 1 and a plane that is parallel to the plane formed by the shaft centerline CLSH and the X-axis offset a distance of 7.62 mm (L2) in a direction closer to the toe 16.
In another embodiment, the recess extends along the top line from about 10 percent to about 50 percent of the top line length. In yet another embodiment, the recess extends along the top line from about 15 percent to about 45 percent of the top line length. In still another embodiment, the recess extends along the top line from about 30 percent to about 50 percent of the top line length. The recess may also extend along the top line from about 60 percent to about 95 percent, preferably from about 70 percent to about 95 percent.
In yet another embodiment, the recess completely extends along the top line. For example, the recess extends along 100 percent of the top line length. In another embodiment, the recess extends along the complete length of the top line and wraps around to extend into the toe of the club head. For example, the recess may extend around the top line-toe transition to a point about halfway around the toe of the club head toward the sole.
The recess 20 preferably has a volume of about 0.001 in3 to about 0.2 in3. In one embodiment, the volume of the recess is about 0.005 in3 to about 0.15 in3. In another embodiment, the volume of the recess is about 0.01 in3 to about 0.10 in3. In yet another embodiment, the volume of the recess is about 0.05 in3 to about 0.09 in3.
In relative terms, the recess 20 has a volume that is from about 0.5 percent to about 10 percent of the volume of the body 10. In one embodiment, the recess has a volume of about 1 percent to about 8 percent of the volume of the body. In another embodiment, the recess has a volume of about 2 percent to about 7 percent of the volume of the body. In still another embodiment, the recess has a volume of about 3 percent to about 5 percent of the volume of the body.
The recess 20 preferably has a depth D from about 0.254 mm to about 6.35 mm. For example, the recess may have a depth D of about 1.27 mm to about 5.08 mm. In one embodiment, the depth D of the recess is about 2.032 mm to about 3.81 mm. In still another embodiment, the recess has a depth D of about 2.54 mm to about 5.08 mm.
The recess may have a varying depth. For example, in one embodiment, a first portion of the recess has a depth D1 of about 10 percent to about 90 percent of the depth D2 of a second portion of the recess. In one embodiment, a first portion of the recess has a depth D1 about 20 percent to about 80 percent of the depth D2 of a second portion of the recess. For example, when the recess extends around the toe toward the sole, the first portion may be the portion that extends from the toe toward the sole and the second portion may be the portion that extends along the top line of the club. In an alternate embodiment, the recess has a constant depth.
As generally shown in
In one embodiment, the insert 30 has a density that is less than the density of the club head body 10. As used herein, “density” is also intended to relate to “specific gravity”. For example, because specific gravity is merely the ratio of the density of a given solid or liquid substance to the density of water at a specific temperature and pressure, these terms are used interchangeably when discussing the relative density or specific gravity of the insert as compared to other portions of the club (such as the body) or other inserts in the club. Since the mass of the insert 30 is less than the mass removed by the recess 20, the extra mass may be replaced in more desirous locations on the club head 1. These locations may include, for example, the club head perimeter and/or the sole 13. Alternatively, no additional mass is added to the club head 1; rather, only the recess 20 and the insert 30 are used to enhance the playing characteristics of the golf club.
A body's center of gravity is determined by its weight distribution. Mass added or removed directly on the center of gravity will have no effect on the center of gravity's location. In contrast, mass added or removed far away from the center of gravity will have the greatest effect on moving the center of gravity. Removing mass from the highest areas of a club head will have the greatest effect on lowering the center of gravity. Adding the mass removed from the high areas to the bottom of the club head will further lower the center of gravity. The top line area and top-of-hosel area are the two highest vertical areas in relation to the ground plane on an iron-type head (when the head is at the address position). By removing the top line portion of the face from the casting and replacing it with, for example, a lightweight viscoelastic piece, anywhere from 20-50 grams are removed from the top of the head, depending upon the design of the viscoelastic piece. That weight is redistributed to the bottom portion of the club, lowering the center of gravity even further versus that same club head constructed entirely of a metallic material, such as steel.
MOI is also a property that is affected by mass distribution. Bodies that have mass distributed far from the center of gravity have higher MOI's about their center of gravity than bodies that have mass concentrated near their center of gravity. Removing the mass from the top of the face lowers the MOI about the center of gravity with respect to certain axes. The axis of rotation that relates to an iron's forgiveness is rotation in the heel-toe direction about the center of gravity—an axis parallel to the Z-axis. A higher MOI about this axis indicates greater resistance to twisting on off-center hits and, thus, more forgiveness. By adding the mass removed from the top line 12 back into the low-heel and low-toe areas of the club head, the reduction in MOI in the heel-toe direction due to removal of metallic material from the top line 12 is minimized.
In this aspect of the invention, the insert 30 may have a density from approximately 0.5 g/cm3 to approximately 5 g/cm3, and is preferably less than the body density by at least about 3 g/cm3. For example, a low density insert may have a density between about 1.2 g/cm3 to about 2 g/cm3. Preferably, the specific gravity of the insert in this embodiment is less than 1.5 g/cm3. Ideally, the specific gravity of the insert in this embodiment is less than 1.3 g/cm3.
In one embodiment, the density of the insert is less than the body density by at least about 4 g/cm3. In another embodiment, the density of the insert is less than the body density by at least about 5 g/cm3. The net effect of creating the recess 20 and adding the lower density insert 30 lowers the club head center of gravity (CG1 in
Suitable materials for a low density insert include, but are not limited to, nylon, glass fiber reinforced nylon, polyurethane, polyurea, bulk molding compound, thermoplastics, thermosets, resins, and combinations thereof.
Table 1 shows a comparison of center of gravity locations and MOI's for a 6-iron having a urethane insert 30 to a similar club head formed completely of steel. Note that the measurements presented in Table 1 do not include any weights that may be added to the club head.
CGx, CGy, and CGz are the x-, y-, and z-components of the center of gravity location, respectively. Ixx, Iyy, and Izz are the MOI's about the x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively.
In the alternative, the insert 30 may have a higher density than the body. For example, the insert 30 may have a density greater than about 5 g/cm3, preferably greater than about 7 g/cm3, and more preferably greater than about 9 g/cm3, and is preferably more than the body density by at least about 1 g/cm3. For example, the insert may have a density of about 12 g/cm3 to about 15 17 g/cm3, preferably about 13 g/cm3 to about 16 g/cm3, and more preferably about 14 g/cm3 to about 15 g/cm3. In one embodiment, the density of the insert is greater than the body density by at least about 2 g/cm3, preferably about 3 g/cm3 or more, more preferably about 4 g/cm3 or more, and even more preferably about 5 g/cm3 or more.
Without being bound to any particular theory, adding mass to the top line raises the center of gravity and the moment of inertia of the club head. In particular, the net effect of creating the recess 20 and adding the higher density insert 30 raises the club head center of gravity (CG3 in
In this aspect of the invention, the recess 20 and the insert 30 may increase the club head MOI measured about an axis parallel to the Z-axis and passing through the center of gravity by at least 20 gm·cm2. That is, the club head 1 has an increase in MOI measured about a vertical axis passing through the center of gravity of at least 20 gm·cm2 compared to a substantially similar golf club head without the recess 20 and the insert 30. Thus, the recess 20 and insert 30 produce a more forgiving and playable golf club.
Suitable materials for the high density insert include, but are not limited to, powdered tungsten, a tungsten loaded polymer, and other powdered metal polymer combinations.
Table 2 shows a comparison of center of gravity locations and MOI's for a 6-iron having a tungsten-loaded polymer insert 30 to a similar club head formed completely of steel. Note that the measurements presented in Table 2 do not include any weights that may be added to the club head.
CGx, CGy, and CGz are the x-, y-, and z-components of the center of gravity location, respectively. Izz is the moment of inertia about the center of gravity parallel to the z-axis. Preferably, the tungsten-loaded top line insert raises the vertical center of gravity by at least about 0.0254 mm when compared to a similar club with a steel top line. In one embodiment, the tungsten-loaded polymer top line insert raises the CGz by about 0.508 mm or more, preferably about 0.533 mm or more, and even more preferably greater than about 0.635 mm. The moment of inertia Izz of the club head with a high density insert in the top line is at least about 1 percent greater than the moment of inertia Izz of a similar club head with a steel top line. In one embodiment, the Izz of a club head having a heavier insert than the body is increased by about 1.5 percent or more when compared to the Izz of a similar club head with a steel top line.
Furthermore, a club head with a heavier top line insert (such as a tungsten-loaded polymer insert) preferably has a CGz of at least about 0.508 mm more than a similar club head with a lighter top line insert (such as a urethane insert). For example, the CGz of a heavier insert club head may be at least about 0.635 mm more, preferably about 0.762 mm or more, and more preferably about 0.889 mm or more, than the CGz of a lighter insert club head.
Likewise, a club head with a heavier top line insert (such as a tungsten-loaded polymer insert) preferably has a Izz that is at least about 2 percent more than the Izz of a similar club head with a lighter top line insert (such as a urethane insert). For example, the Izz of a heavier insert club head may be at least about 2.5 percent greater than the Izz of a lighter insert club head.
The hardness of the insert will vary depending on the particular material used to form the insert. In one embodiment, the insert has a hardness ranging from about 80 Shore A to about 50 Shore D. In another embodiment, the hardness of the insert ranges from about 20 Shore D to about 50 Shore D. In an alternate embodiment, the hardness of the insert is less than about 20 Shore D.
The insert 30 may contain one or more dampening materials, which diminish vibrations in the club head, including vibrations generated during an off-center hit. Preferred dampening materials include those materials known as thermoplastic or thermoset polymers, such as rubber, urethane, polyurethane, butadiene, polybutadiene, silicone, and combinations thereof. Energy is transferred from the club to the ball during impact. Some energy, however, is lost due to vibration of the head caused by the impact. These vibrations produce undesirable sensations in both feel and sound to the user. Because the viscoelastic dampening material of the insert 30 is in direct contact with the metal club head (the vibrating body), it serves to dampen these vibrations, improving sound and feel.
Without being bound to any particular theory, a club with a high center of gravity is likely to impart more spin to the golf ball due to vertical gear effects. This is because an impact made below the center of gravity will increase the spin rate of the ball to help maximize trajectory and distance. An impact made high on the face above the center of gravity will create a higher launch angle, and the vertical gear effect will actually cause the ball to spin less. This can produce greater distance as the ball is subject to less lift or drag that a higher spin creates. Thus, in a typical club set, the higher the loft angle of the club, the lower the center of gravity (as compared to a lower loft angle club). The ability to generate more ball spin for the short irons is an important factor in the golfer's ability to control both the distance of the golf shot, and the distance the ball will roll after the ball hits the green.
However, because the material selection of insert, length, depth, and/or volume of the recess and insert of the present invention allow for adjustments to the center of gravity and moment of inertia, the present invention also contemplates a set of clubs where at least one club is equipped with a low density insert in the club head and at least one club is equipped with a higher density insert in the club head. For example, at least one long iron in the set preferably has a low density insert in the club head as described herein. The term “long irons” refers to 3 and 4 irons (and possibly 1 and 2 irons if application). The club heads on long irons have the least amount of angle, providing primarily distance. In contrast, at least one short iron in the set preferably has a high density insert in the club head. The term “short irons refers to any of the more lofted, shorter-shafted irons (usually considered to include the 8 iron through all wedges).
Due to vertical gear effects, this construction allows for more spin to be imparted to the ball from the short irons, and less spin imparted to the ball for the long irons. The ability to generate more spin in the short irons is an important factor in the golfer's ability to control both the distance of the golf shot and the distance the ball will roll after the ball hits the green.
Like the insert that fits within the recess, the insert 50 that fits over the protrusion 19 may be formed of a low density material in order to lower the center of gravity and/or MOI of the club head. In the alternative, the insert 50 may formed of a high density material in order to raise the center of gravity and/or MOI of the club head. The differences between the density of the insert and the body of the club head discussed above with respect to insert 30 also apply in this aspect of the invention.
It is possible that there are variations in size of the metallic portions of the club heads 1, 2 caused during forming and polishing. These variations typically are larger than the variations in size due to molding viscoelastic materials of the inserts 30. To aid in hiding any discrepancy between the two portions of the club head, a groove 32 may be formed in the insert 30 so the edges are visible to the user once the two pieces have been put together. This groove 32 may be created simultaneously with the rest of the insert 30, or as a secondary step. The preferred width and depth of the groove 32 are about 1 mm or less. In one embodiment, the width and depth are about 0.8 mm or less, preferably about 0.75 mm or less, and more preferably about 0.7 mm or less.
In the illustrated example of
Use of an insert also has the added benefit of increasing the durability of the club head. For example, over the course of play, clubs carried together in a bag are knocked together. These impacts create marks on the club heads. The top-toe portion of the club is an area that is likely to impact with other clubs. By making that area out of a softer material, the likelihood of creating marks on the head due to club-to-club impacts is reduced.
As before, the insert in this aspect of the invention may be a different material than a light weight viscoelastic material. For example, the insert may be formed of a higher density material in an effort to adjust the center of gravity upward and increase the Izz.
In this aspect of the invention, the insert material preferably has the following properties at 50% relative humidity and 73° F.: tensile strength of 15 kpsi to 20 kpsi, 17.5 kpsi being preferred; flexural modulus of 650 kpsi to 750 kpsi, 600 kpsi being preferred; notched impact strength of 3 ft·lb/in to 4 ft·lb/in, 3.5 ft·lb/in being preferred; and specific gravity of 1.25 to 2, 1.4 being preferred. These properties and measurement methods are discussed in ASTM D 638, ASTM D 790, ASTM D 256, and ASTM D 792, respectively, which are incorporated herein by reference. One preferred material for the insert 30 of this embodiment is a 33% glass reinforced nylon 66. Zytel® 74G33L NC 010 from DuPont is a preferred nylon. This product meets the preferred physical properties and allows the club designer to provide a top line 12 with a surface finish similar to that of an all steel club head, which may be beneficial to some golfers. More or less glass reinforcement may be used. In particular, while 25 percent to 50 percent is a preferred range for glass (including fiberglass) reinforcement in the nylon material of the insert 30, other amounts may be used. In addition, other reinforcing materials other than glass may also be used.
The club head 4 of
A third insert 48 may also be included with the club head 4. This third insert 48 preferably is coupled to the back 14 of the club head 4, opposite the front surface 11. The insert 48 preferably is formed of a viscoelastic material, and thus it damps unwanted vibrations via free-layer damping. The insert 48 may be coupled to the club head 4 in any known manner, such as via an adhesive. The insert 48, as well as the other inserts described herein, may also inherently possess adhesive properties such that it may coupled directly to the club head without the need of a separate adhesive material.
In addition to removing mass from the central portion of the top line 12, additional material, and therefore mass, may be removed from heel and toe portions of the top line 12.
As shown in the exemplary club head 5 illustrated in
These toe and heel top line recesses work in conjunction with the central top line recess to remove unneeded club head mass from the upper portion of the club head, which may be repositioned as added mass or weight members in other, more beneficial locations of the club head while keeping the overall club head mass and weight constant. For example, mass may be added to heel and toe portions of the sole, such as by including additional material forming the club head body 10 or by incorporating weight inserts. This beneficially further lowers the club head center of gravity, making the resulting golf club easier to use. Furthermore, repositioning of the “saved” mass and weight to toe and heel portions of the club head further increase the club head MOI, making the club head more stable and forgiving, also increasing the playability of the resulting golf club.
In addition to the first rear insert 52, the club head 6 further includes a second rear insert 54. This insert 54 is positioned atop the first insert 52, and includes a notch at its lower end to contact and overlap the first insert 52. As shown in
In another embodiment of the invention as seen in
Any of the inserts discussed herein including, but not limited to, inserts 30, 35, 37, 50, 60, 65, 67, and 80 may be retained within the respective recesses in known manner, such as through use of an adhesive or epoxy. Alternatively, the inserts of the invention may be molded in place, known as “co-molding.” To ensure a smooth top line surface along the entire length of the top line, the top line, with the inserts in place, may be polished. This may be performed, for example, through wet sanding or grinding, which facilitates simultaneous removal of both metallic and polymer/nylon materials. Preferably, the toe and heel recesses are spaced from the central recess by portions of the club head body. This helps ensure that structural integrity of the club head is retained. The insert(s) may also be held in place by utilizing the protrusion configurations generally shown in
As previously described, the golf club head of the present invention has a moment of inertia Izz about an axis that passes through the center of gravity and is parallel to the z-axis (as shown in
In addition, the moment of inertia Izz for a club head of the present invention may be related to the vertical center of gravity (CGz) by the following equation:
Izz≧CGz*170 (1)
where Izz is in g·cm2 and CGz is measured in millimeters (mm) in the z-direction.
In one embodiment, the club head satisfies the following relationship between the specific gravity of a low density, light weight top line insert, the moment of inertia Izz, and the center of gravity CGz:
Izz≧CGz*SG*130 (2)
where specific gravity of the insert is SG, Izz is greater than 2500 and is in g·cm2, and CGz is measured in millimeters (mm) in the z-direction.
In another embodiment, the club head satisfies the following relationship between the specific gravity of a high density, heavy weight top line insert, the moment of inertia Izz, and the center of gravity CGz:
Izz≧CG2*SG*17 (3)
where specific gravity of the insert is SG, Izz is greater than 2500 and is in g·cm2, and CGz is measured in millimeters (mm) in the z-direction.
A set of club heads including at least one club head with a low density (light weight) and at least one club head with a high density (heavy weight) insert) will preferably have clubs in the set that meet the relationship of all three equations.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar references in the context of describing the invention are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein.
As used herein, directional references such as rear, front, lower, etc. are made with respect to the club head when grounded at the address position. See, for example,
Other than in the operating examples, or unless otherwise expressly specified, all of the numerical ranges, amounts, values, and percentages, such as those for amounts of materials, moments of inertias, center of gravity locations, and others in the following portion of the specification, may be read as if prefaced by the word “about” even though the term “about” may not expressly appear with the value, amount, or range. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following description and claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in any specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Furthermore, when numerical ranges of varying scope are set forth herein, it is contemplated that any combination of these values inclusive of the recited values may be used.
While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not of limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus the present invention should not be limited by the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents. Furthermore, while certain advantages of the invention have been described herein, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/362,666, filed Jan. 30, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/896,237, filed Aug. 30, 2007, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,938,737, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/266,172, filed Nov. 4, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,524,250, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/843,622, filed May 12, 2004, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,481,718, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1319233 | Mattern | Oct 1919 | A |
1534600 | Mattern | Apr 1925 | A |
2429351 | Fetterolf | Oct 1947 | A |
3084940 | Cissel | Apr 1963 | A |
3881733 | Csernits | May 1975 | A |
3970236 | Rogers | Jul 1976 | A |
4027885 | Rogers | Jun 1977 | A |
4340230 | Churchward | Jul 1982 | A |
4398965 | Campau | Aug 1983 | A |
4523759 | Igarashi | Jun 1985 | A |
4607846 | Perkins | Aug 1986 | A |
4687205 | Tominaga et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4811950 | Kobayashi | Mar 1989 | A |
4874171 | Ezaki et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4928972 | Nakanishi et al. | May 1990 | A |
4957294 | Long | Sep 1990 | A |
D321920 | Parente et al. | Nov 1991 | S |
5110131 | Long | May 1992 | A |
5221087 | Fenton et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
D339183 | Stites, III | Sep 1993 | S |
D343216 | Chorne | Jan 1994 | S |
5303922 | Lo | Apr 1994 | A |
5316298 | Hutin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5377979 | Long | Jan 1995 | A |
5377985 | Ohnishi | Jan 1995 | A |
5413336 | Iwanaga | May 1995 | A |
5439223 | Kobayashi | Aug 1995 | A |
5492327 | Biafore, Jr. | Feb 1996 | A |
5544885 | Besnard et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5564705 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5586947 | Hutin | Dec 1996 | A |
5616088 | Aizawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5643112 | Besnard et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669826 | Chang et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5772527 | Liu | Jun 1998 | A |
5938540 | Lu | Aug 1999 | A |
6042486 | Gallagher | Mar 2000 | A |
6080069 | Long | Jun 2000 | A |
6093112 | Peters et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
RE36950 | Allen | Nov 2000 | E |
6302807 | Rohrer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306048 | McCabe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332848 | Long et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6443857 | Chuang | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478690 | Helmstetter et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6592469 | Gilbert | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6688989 | Best | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702693 | Bamber | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6769998 | Clausen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773361 | Lee | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6814674 | Clausen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830519 | Reed et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6902495 | Pergande et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921344 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929563 | Nishitani | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7014571 | Deshmukh | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7048648 | Breier et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7153219 | Reed et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7244188 | Best | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7303486 | Imamoto | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7481718 | Soracco | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7524250 | Soracco et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7588503 | Roach et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7621822 | Roach | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7686704 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7938737 | Soracco et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8088022 | Soracco et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020042307 | Deshmukh | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020094883 | Chuang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107087 | Fagot | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165041 | Takeda | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030032499 | Wahl et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045372 | Vrska | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030092502 | Pergande et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125129 | Saksun | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040023730 | Nagai et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040116200 | Helmstetter et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040204263 | Fagot et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050096151 | Hou et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143190 | Takeda | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050277484 | Reed et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277485 | Hou et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025234 | Nicolette et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052184 | Soracco et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070129166 | Shimazaki et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080015051 | Roach et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051220 | Soracco et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090221382 | Soracco et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100056297 | Roach et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05-168732 | Jul 1993 | JP |
07-031697 | Feb 1995 | JP |
07-213656 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08-024379 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08-057088 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08-206258 | Aug 1996 | JP |
08-257181 | Oct 1996 | JP |
3032837 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09-173513 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-225075 | Sep 1997 | JP |
11-226158 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-153008 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001-161870 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2003-093550 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2006-300589 | Nov 2006 | JP |
04-082576 | Apr 2008 | JP |
3145482 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2005082062 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Advisory Action dated May 17, 2007 of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2008 of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2007 of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2010 of related Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-300589. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2008 of related Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-300589. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2010 (mailed Jan. 11, 2011) of related Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-300589 (Trial No. 2009-20956). |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2005 of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2007 of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2008 of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,172. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2006 of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2010 of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,172. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2005 of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2007 of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,172. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2009 of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/896,237. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 30, 2008 of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,172. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 2, 2008 of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/553,977. |
U. S. Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/553,977. |
U. S. Office Action (Advisory Action) Dated May 17, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action (Final) Dated Feb. 4, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action (Final) Dated Feb. 9, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action (Notice of Allowance Dated Dec. 30, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,172. |
U. S. Office Action (Notice of Allowance) Dated Oct. 2, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Apr. 14, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Apr. 18, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Aug. 22, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Dec. 12, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Jul. 18, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Jul. 9, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Jun. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,172. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Jun. 15, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/553,977. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Nov. 22, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/843,622. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Nov. 28, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,172. |
U. S. Office Action Dated Sep. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Advisory Action, dated Jun. 26, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Amendment (after Final) to Advisory Action, dated Jul. 14, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Appeal Brief Dated Dec. 2, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Appellants Reply Brief, dated May 13, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Docketing Notice, dated Aug. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Examiners Answer to Appeal Brief, dted Mar. 15, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Pre-Brief Conference Decision, dated Nov. 9, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Reply Brief Noted, dated Jul. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U. S. Office Action, BPAI, Supplemental Appeal Brief, dated Dec. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,180. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 19, 2011 of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/896,237. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2010 of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/896,237. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2010 of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/896,237. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120100925 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12362666 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 13336630 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11896237 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 12362666 | US | |
Parent | 11266172 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11896237 | US | |
Parent | 10843622 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 11266172 | US |