GOLF CLUB HEAD

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20250222312
  • Publication Number
    20250222312
  • Date Filed
    January 03, 2025
    10 months ago
  • Date Published
    July 10, 2025
    3 months ago
Abstract
A golf club head includes a crown, a heel portion, a toe portion opposite the heel portion, a sole opposite the crown, and a striking face. The striking face includes a striking face periphery, a heel-wardmost extent, a toe-wardmost extent, a lowermost extent, an uppermost extent, and a face center. A maximum characteristic time of the striking face corresponds to a point P1 on the striking face. The point P1 is laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D6. The distance D6 is no less than 21.3 mm.
Description
BACKGROUND

The performance of golf clubs is evaluated on the basis of many factors, which vary dependent on the type of club. For example, iron-type golf clubs are intended to exhibit consistent shot dispersion, have desirable feel, and some degree of workability. Wood-type golf clubs, e.g. drivers and fairway woods, preferably also are evaluated of the basis of shot dispersion, feel, and workability. However, for wood-type golf clubs, golfers tend to place disproportionate weight on shot distance, including carry and roll distances.


Often, golf clubs may be designed to perform well under ideal conditions including for impacts at an ideal location on the striking face. However, overvaluing success under ideal conditions may not result in a golf club that performs well for a particular golfer overall. For example, golf clubs, particularly wood-type clubs, are often designed such that impacts at or near a face center lead to most effective overall results. However, such principle may not be universally true, particularly for some classes of golfer.


SUMMARY

An object, therefore, of the present disclosure is to provide a golf club head that is both adapted for ideal impact at a location offset from face center and designed such that the ideal impact location is perceived by a golfer to be the most desirable location of impact.


In one aspect of the present disclosure, a golf club head includes a crown, a heel portion, a toe portion opposite the heel portion, a sole opposite the crown, and a striking face. The striking face includes a striking face periphery, a heel-wardmost extent, a toe-wardmost extent, a lowermost extent, an uppermost extent, and a face center. A central zone is delimited by the striking face periphery, a first virtual vertical plane perpendicular to the striking face and spaced heel-ward from the face center by xx, and a second virtual vertical plane perpendicular to the striking face and spaced toe-ward of the face center by xx. A geometric center is a point on the striking face vertically halfway between the uppermost extent and the lowermost extent, and laterally halfway between the heel-wardmost extent and toe-wardmost extent. A maximum characteristic time (CT) corresponds with a point P1 on the striking face. P1 is located outside of the central zone.


In another aspect of the present disclosure, a golf club head includes a crown, a sole opposite the crown, a heel portion, a toe portion opposite the heel portion, and a striking face. The striking face includes a heel-wardmost extent, a toe-wardmost extent, a lowermost extent, an uppermost extent, and a face center. A geometric center is a point on the striking face vertically halfway between the uppermost extent and the lowermost extent, and laterally halfway between the heel-wardmost extent and toe-wardmost extent. The geometric center is laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D1 that is no less than 2 mm


In another aspect of the present disclosure, a golf club head includes a crown having alignment indicia thereon, a sole opposite the crown, a heel portion, a toe portion opposite the heel portion, and a striking face. The striking face includes a face center. The alignment indicia is laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D4 that is greater than 2 mm.


These and other features and advantages of the golf club heads, their implementations, and the methods of manufacture thereof according to the various aspects of the present disclosure will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description, drawings, and appended claims. The description and drawings described below are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any manner.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The drawings described below are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way. Exemplary implementations will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 shows a front elevation view of an exemplary golf club head in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 shows a heel-side view of the exemplary golf club head of FIG. 1 in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 shows a top plan view of the exemplary golf club head of FIG. 1 in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 shows a top plan view of the exemplary golf club head of FIG. 1 in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 shows a front elevation view of the exemplary golf club head of FIG. 1 in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 6 shows a front elevation view of the exemplary golf club head of FIG. 1 in accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 7 shows a detailed view of a striking face of the exemplary golf club head of FIG. 1, oriented with the striking face plane parallel to the plane of the paper, in accordance with one ore more aspects of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one aspect of the present disclosure, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, a golf club head xx is shown. The golf club head xx includes a crown xx (or top portion) and a sole xx opposite the crown portion xx. The club head xx further includes a heel portion xx, a toe portion xx opposite the heel portion xx, and a striking face xx. A hosel xx extends from the heel portion xx and preferably includes an internal hosel bore xx (see e.g. FIG. 4) configured to receive a conventional golf shaft (not shown). The internal bore xx of the hosel xx defines a central axis, i.e. a hosel axis xx.


The striking face xx is preferably planar or quasi-planar. For example, the striking face xx, in some cases (e.g. in the case of iron-type club heads) may generally exhibit a planar contour. However, in other cases, particularly for wood-type club heads, preferably the contour of striking face xx is generally planar, but includes curvature of relatively high radius (i.e. no less than 7 in.). For example, preferably, the striking face xx includes a roll of about 8 in and a bulge of about 8.5 in. In some aspects, both roll and bulge remain constant from location to location about the striking face xx. However, in other aspects, preferably, bulge and/or roll vary across the striking face xx in a vertical direction and/or a horizontal direction.


The striking face xx is delimited by a striking face periphery xx. The striking face periphery xx is defined by the loci of points circumscribing the quasi-planar region defining the striking face xx as described above. In some cases, the striking face periphery is readily ascertainable, e.g. as an abrupt change in contour forming an angled peripheral edge. However, in other cases, the transition from striking face xx to main body is less discernible. In such cases, the striking face periphery xx is understood to be the loci of points circumscribing the quasi-planar striking face where transition occurs from high radius of curvature to low radius of curvature, i.e. 4 in or less. The striking face xx may transition to a return portion xx that includes the crown xx, the sole xx, and the rear portion xx. The region of transition from the striking face xx to the return portion xx, herein, is referred to as the shoulder portion xx.


The golf club head xx is shown in a reference position. “Reference position,” as used herein, denotes a position of the club head xx where the hosel axis xx is oriented at a lie angle of 60° with respect to a virtual ground plane, e.g. virtual ground plane xx, and lies in an imaginary vertical hosel plane xx, which contains an imaginary horizontal line generally parallel to the striking face, e.g. striking face xx. Unless otherwise denoted, attributes described herein are presumed to apply to the club head xx as oriented in a reference position.


The striking face xx of the club head xx includes a face center xx. For all purposes herein, “face center” (e.g. face center xx) refers to a point on a striking face of a club head that is simultaneously: (a) laterally equidistance the heel-side and toe-side of the periphery of the striking face xx; and (b) vertically equidistance the top-side and sole-side of the periphery of the striking face xx of the club head xx.


From a practical standpoint, face center (e.g. face center xx as shown in FIG. 1) may be determined in accordance with the United States Golf Association's Procedure for Measuring the Flexibility of a Golf Clubhead (Revision 2.0, Mar. 25, 2005) available from the USGA. Specifically, a standard template is used that has a coordinate system with a heel-toe axis orthogonal to a top-bottom axis. An aperture is disposed at the origin of the coordinate system, with the axes being graduated into evenly spaced increments. The template may be made of a flexible material, e.g., a transparent polymer. The location of the face center xx is determined by initially applying the template to the striking face xx so that the aperture is approximately in the middle of the striking face xx and the heel-toe axis is generally horizontal. The template is then translated in the heel-toe direction along the striking face xx until the heel and toe measurements along the axis at opposite points on the striking face perimeter of the striking face xx proximate respective ones of the heel and toe portions xx and xx have the same absolute value. Once the template is centered with respect to the striking face xx in the heel-toe direction, the template is translated into the top-bottom direction along the striking face xx until the measurements along the axis at opposite points on the striking face perimeter of the striking face xx proximate respective ones of the top and bottom portions xx and xx have the same absolute value. The above sequence is repeated until the absolute value of the heel measurement along the axis is equal to that of the toe measurement and the absolute value of the bottom measurement along axis is equal to that of the top measurement. A point is then marked on the striking face xx through the aperture to designate the face center xx.


Preferably, the club head xx is a wood-type club head. More preferably, the club head xx is a driver-type club head, e.g. configured to impact a golf ball off a tee. Accordingly, the golf club head xx preferably has a volume no less than 390 cc, more preferably between about 410 cc and 470 cc, even more preferably between about 440 cc and 465 cc. Additionally, or alternatively, the club head xx has a head mass no less than 170 g, more preferably no less than 185 g, and even more preferably within the range of 185 g to 210 g. Lighter club heads (e.g. those with masses under 185 g) may exhibit particular advantages for certain classes of golfers. However, for purposes herein, greater head mass may be preferably. For example, greater club head mass provides for a greater proportion of discretionary mass, which is of particular significance in adapting the club head xx for ideal impact in an off-centered location, as will be discussed in more detail below.


Additionally, or alternatively, the club head xx preferably includes a center of gravity xx. The club head xx further exhibits a moment of inertia, Izz, about a vertical axis passing through the center of gravity xx. Preferably, Izz is no less than 3500 g·cm2, more preferably no less than 4000 g·cm2, even more preferably no less than 4400 g·cm2, and yet even more preferably between about 4600 g·cm2 and 5900 g·cm2.


Referring specifically to FIGS. 4 and 5, the golf club head xx includes a face center xx located on the striking face xx, determined using the method described above. However, preferably, the striking face xx is shaped in a manner as to encourage a golfer to impact a ball at a location other than the measured face center xx. To this end, the striking face xx is preferably asymmetric about a virtual vertical plane xx passing through the face center xx. More specifically, the striking face xx is preferably elongate in a high-toe to low-heel direction. This general shape may generate the perception that the striking face xx extends further in functional space that it does.


Referring to FIG. 5, the striking face xx further defines various extents. An uppermost extent xx is the uppermost location of the striking face xx. A lowermost extent xx is the lowermost location of the striking face xx. A heel-ward-most extent xx is the heel-ward-most location of the striking face xx. A toe-ward-most extent xx is the toe-ward-most location of the striking face xx.


Where a golfer perceives an ideal impact location, absent any particular alignment aid, may vary from golfer to golfer. However, it is generally believed that the extremities of the striking face xx are more influential in suggesting the location of an ideal impact location than, say, the face center xx. In fact, the measured location of the face center xx, in many cases, may be non-intuitive and non-representative of the overall shape of the striking face xx as perceived by a golfer.


Referring to FIG. 5, one method of characterizing the location of the directional extremities of the striking face xx is by considering the geometric center xx of the striking face xx. “Geometric center” may assume various meanings in the art. However, for all purposes herein, “geometric center” refers to a point on the striking face of a club head that is: (a) laterally equidistant the heelward-most extent and the toe-ward-most extent of the striking face; and (b) vertically equidistance the uppermost extent and the lowermost extent of the striking face. These extents are fixed locations about the periphery of the striking face. In contrast, the face center, e.g. face center xx, may or may not be aligned with such extremities.


In some aspects, the geometric center xx may be coincident with the face center xx. However, preferably, the geometric center xx is offset, at least in a lateral (i.e. heel to toe) direction, from the face center xx. In particular, the geometric center xx of the striking face xx is preferably laterally offset from the face center xx by a distance D1 that is no less than 2 mm, more preferably no less than 4 mm, and even more preferably no less than 5 mm. In some such aspects, the geometric center xx is preferably offset from the face center xx toward the toe portion xx. However, in alternative aspects, the geometric center xx is laterally offset from the face center xx in a direction toward the heel portion xx. Additionally or alternatively, preferably, the geometric center xx is offset vertically from the face center xx. The vertical offset of the geometric center xx is preferably in a direction toward the crown (or an upward direction). Preferably the degree of vertical offset is no less than 2 mm, more preferably no less than 3 mm, and even more preferably no less than 4 mm.


Such offset between the geometric center xx and the face center xx may be achieved by selectively shaping the striking face periphery xx. For example, with particular reference to FIG. 7, the striking face xx, in plane view, is preferable asymmetric. Additionally, preferably, the toe-wardmost extent xx is laterally spaced further from the face center than the heel-wardmost extent xx. Additionally, or alternatively, the toe-wardmost extent xx is located higher than the face center xx and preferably the heel-wardmost extent xx is located sole-ward of the face center xx. Additionally, or alternatively, the uppermost extent xx of the striking face xx is located toe-ward of the face center xx and, preferably, the sole-wardmost extent xx of the striking face xx is located heelward of the face center xx. A coordinate system is superimposed on the striking face xx as shown in FIG. 7. A first virtual plane extends in a heel to toe direction perpendicular to the striking face xx and a second plane extends in a vertical direction perpendicular to the striking face xx, both the first and second planes passing through the face center xx. These planes divide the striking face xx into a first (I) upper-heel quadrant, a second (II) upper-toe quadrant, a third (III) lower-toe quadrant, and a fourth (IV) lower-heel quadrant. The area of the striking face xx that lies in quadrant II is preferably greater than the striking face area lying in any of quadrants I, III, and IV. The area of the striking face xx that lies in quadrant IV also preferably is greater than the area of the striking face xx that lies in either of quadrants I and III.


Referring to FIG. 3, the crown xx of the club head xx preferably includes an alignment feature (or indicia) xx thereon. The alignment feature xx is preferably a decal or transfer image. However, in some aspects, the alignment feature xx is any of, or a combination of, a reveal with paint fill, an etched or media blasted portion, a projection, a recess, or any other surface treatment or application that results in contrasting appearance with adjacent portions of the exterior surface of the crown xx.


Preferably, the alignment indicia xx is of a size sufficient to assist the golfer in aligning the club head xx with a golf ball to be impacted, e.g. between about 1 mm and 5 mm in width. Additionally, the alignment feature xx is preferably of a geometric shape, e.g. a line, dot, rectangle, triangle, circle, ellipse, diamond, caret, chevron, or arrow. The alignment feature xx may include plural, e.g. two, features that are spaced apart, but assist in enabling a golfer to visualize a preferred axis of alignment. For example, two dots aligned in a front to rear direction may better assist the golfer in orienting the club head xx than a single dot, as the plural dots provide a better indication of rotational offset.


Preferably, the alignment feature xx, by virtue of its shape, defines a central axis, which in turn preferably aligns in a heel to toe direction with an intended ideal impact location. In such aspects, preferably, a central axis xx of the alignment feature xx is laterally spaced from the geometric center xx by a distance D5 no greater than 4 mm, and more preferably no greater than 2 mm. Even more preferably, the alignment feature xx is substantially aligned with the geometric center xx. Accordingly, the alignment feature xx is laterally spaced from the face center xx by a distance D4 that is preferably greater than 2 mm, more preferably no less than 4 mm, and even more preferably no less than 5 mm. Additionally or alternatively, the alignment feature xx is laterally spaced toe-ward of the face center xx for its preferred association with the geometric center xx.


Several advantages result from adapting the club head xx such that a perceived ideal impact location is laterally offset from the face center xx. First, notwithstanding other attributes such as mass properties and bulge/roll, locations on the club head xx toward the toe portion xx may exhibit greater velocity at impact due to such locations exhibiting greater rotational velocity as they are outward from common axes of rotation during a typical golf swing. Greater velocity at impact may result in greater transfer of momentum from the golf club xx to the golf ball, resulting in overall greater carry distances. Secondly, some classes of golfer, particularly those with relatively high handicaps, are believed generally to impact golf balls at toe-ward locations. By adapting the golf club head xx such that a perceived ideal impact location corresponds to such toe-ward impact locations, the golfer's confidence may increase, resulting in greater shot consistency. Third, a toe-wardly located ideal impact point provides greater design freedom in improving mass properties, as will be described below.


Any shift in perceived ideal impact location, e.g. by cosmetic design and/or structural shaping/contouring, is preferably coupled with modification of the club head's latent attributes to ensure greatest overall performance. In some aspects, shifting perceived ideal impact location toe-ward may provide for greater moment of inertia, particularly Izz. This may be the result of a large proportion of structural mass being tied up by the hosel portion xx. A shift in ideal impact location would preferably be coupled with a commensurate shift in center of gravity xx location. Accordingly, particularly because of the mass of the hosel portion xx, overall head mass may be pushed further from the center of gravity xx than otherwise possible.


In addition, the mass of the hosel xx may disproportionately affect stiffness on the striking face xx. For example, striking face locations proximate the heel portion xx naturally may be associated with lower characteristic time (CT) values than locations proximate the toe portion xx. Thus, shifting the perceived ideal impact location toe-ward may result in greater ability to reduce energy loss on impact, thereby increasing CT at the location of preferred impact. In turn, taking advantage of regions naturally susceptible to higher CT may increase discretionary weight as less mass intervention is necessary to artificially increase CT.


The United States Golf Association (USGA) specifically sets forth rules limiting the ability of a golf club to transfer power to a golf ball, thereby limiting any advantage a golfer may seek over a competitor by equipment alone. This is generally accomplished by imposition of a characteristic time (CT) limit of the face of the club head. Characteristic time, for all purposes herein, refers to characteristic time as laid out, defined, and indicated as measured in the United States Golf Association's PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING THE FLEXIBILITY OF A GOLF CLUBHEAD, Rev. 1.0.0 (May 1, 2008).


Another property useful in quantifying the springiness of a face of a club head is coefficient of restitution (COR). COR had long been the standard property for evaluating springiness by the USGA and is still a useful property. Accordingly, it is to be appreciated that any discussion herein regarding COR or CT—including measuring or using COR or CT at any particular location on the striking face xx of the club head xx—is to be understood as an implicit disclosure of the respective value of CT or COR. Although COR and CT may not necessarily be analogous measurements, for all practical purposes herein, any disclosed COR value (or change in COR) or CT value (or change in CT value) should be considered an implicit disclosure of a corresponding CT or COR value (or change thereof), respectively, in accordance with the following empirically-derived formula:







CT


value



(

μ

s

)


=


(

COR
-
0.718

)

/
0.000436





The center of gravity xx, when projected onto the striking face xx in a direction perpendicular to the striking face xx, corresponds to a sweet spot xx located on striking face xx. Preferably, for the reasons described above, the sweet spot xx is laterally spaced from the geometric center xx by a distance D2 no greater than 4 mm and more preferably no greater than 2 mm. Even more preferably, the sweet spot xx is substantially laterally aligned with the geometric center xx of the striking face xx. Alternatively, or in addition, the sweet spot xx is preferably laterally spaced from the face center xx by a distance D3 no less than 2 mm, more preferably no less than 4 mm, and even more preferably no less than 5 mm.


Relocating the center of gravity xx of the club head xx may be carried out by the strategic positioning of discretionary mass. As described above, preferably, the club head xx has a relatively high club head mass, e.g. greater than 185 g. Accordingly, a relatively large proportion of head mass may be designated as discretionary mass, providing greater ability to shift the center of gravity to a more desirable location than its natural position based on the allocation of structural mass alone. Also, such discretionary mass may be applied particularly to increase moment of inertia values.


Specifically, to shift the center of gravity further toe-ward of the face center xx, a unitary mass pad may be cast into the sole portion xx and/or the crown portion xx, resulting in a thickened region of the respective sole portion xx and/or crown portion xx. Alternatively, an aft-attached mass insert may be secured to the club head xx subsequent casting, forging, bending or other formation of the club head main body. For example, in some embodiments, a mass insert is welded or brazed to an internal surface of the sole portion or alternatively an internal surface of the crown portion. Alternatively, attachment of the mass insert includes mechanical fasteners, interference fit, or other mechanical interlocking mechanism.


Preferably the mass insert density is no less than the main body density, more preferably greater than the main body density. Alternatively, or additionally, the mass insert density is preferably no less than 7 g/cm3, more preferably no less than 8 g/cm3, and even more preferably no less than 10 g/cm3. Additionally, or alternative, the overall density of the main body is no greater than 7 g/cm3, more preferably no greater than 5 g/cm3, and even more preferably no greater than 4.5 g/cm3.


Referring to FIG. 5, additionally, or alternatively, in some such aspects, mass is removed from portions at or proximate the hosel xx of the club head xx. For example, the hosel xx may have a reduced length. For all purposes herein, hosel length L1 refers to a distance measured from the upper end of the hosel xx to the virtual ground plane xx, along the virtual hosel axis xx. Preferably, the hosel length L1 is no greater than 71 mm, more preferably no greater than 68 mm, and even more preferably no greater than 67 mm. Removing mass from locations heel-ward of the geometric center xx, other club head attributes notwithstanding, will likely result in a toe-ward shift of the center of gravity xx and thus a toe-ward shift of the sweet spot xx. Additionally, or alternatively, the hosel xx or locations proximate the hosel xx may be comprised of a discrete component to be secured, e.g. by welding or co-molding, to the main body or separate body component containing the striking face xx, sole portion xx and/or crown xx. Preferably, in such cases, the hosel component has a density less than an overall density of the remainder of the main body, alternatively the density of the striking face xx, and/or alternatively a density of the sole xx.


Referring to FIG. 6, as described above, in some aspects, particularly in the case of wood-type club heads, the striking face xx exhibits a higher coefficient of restitution (COR) and/or a higher CT value at locations offset from the face center xx than measured at the face center xx. The striking face xx preferably includes a point P1 of maximum CT that is no less than 239 μs, more preferably no less than 250 μs, and even more preferably no less than 257 μs. In some such aspects, the CT value at P1 is greater than 257 μs, more preferably greater than or equal to 258 μs.


Referring again to FIG. 6, a first virtual vertical plane V1 is perpendicular to the striking face xx and spaced toe-ward from the face center xx by 21.3 mm. A second virtual vertical plane V2 is perpendicular to the striking face xx and spaced heel-ward from the face center xx by 21.3 mm. A central zone xx of the striking face xx is defined by the area of the striking face xx delimited by the striking face periphery xx, the first vertical plane V1 and the second vertical plane V2. P1 is preferably located outside of the central zone xx. Additionally or alternatively, preferably, P1 is laterally spaced from the face center xx by a distance D6 no less than 5 mm, more preferably no less than 15 mm and even more preferably no less than 21.3 mm. Accordingly, the club head xx is more likely to be considered to comply with various equipment rules promulgated by various regulatory bodies governing the professional or tournament play of golf.


The desired CT values described above may be achieved by limiting and/or appropriately varying the thickness of the striking face xx. E.g. reducing thickness in a particular location of the striking face xx may tend to increase a CT value exhibited by such location. Additionally, or alternatively, structural stiffeners such as ribs, annuli or struts secured to portions of the striking face xx and either the sole xx or crown xxx may be used to further control CT on a location by location basis. Additionally or alternatively, choice of material of the striking face xx may result in a more effective strength to mass profile and as a result may impart greater flexibility to the striking face xx while adhering to acceptable strength or structural integrity thresholds.


Additionally, or alternatively, the curvature of the striking face xx is modified such that impacts at the geometric center xx result in preferable ball flight shape. For example, preferably the bulge and rolls are configured such that the geometric center xx is associated with a neutral or zero face angle (assuming a club head that is intended to exhibit neutral ball flight). Alternatively, for club heads intended to exhibit draw or fade bias, the face angle measured at the geometric center preferably exhibit a positive or negative face angle intended to correspond to the intended draw or fade bias designated by the club head product. Regarding roll, preferably, as measured at the geometric center xx, the striking face xx exhibits a loft substantially equal to the designated or intended loft of the club head xx.


In the foregoing discussion, the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary aspects thereof. However, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these exemplary aspects without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing discussion and the accompanying drawings are to be regarded as merely illustrative of the present invention rather than as limiting its scope in any manner.

Claims
  • 1. A golf club head that, when oriented in a reference position, comprises: a crown;a heel portion;a toe portion opposite the heel portion;a sole opposite the crown;a striking face comprising: a striking face periphery;a heel-wardmost extent;a toe-wardmost extent;a lowermost extent;an uppermost extent;a face center; anda maximum characteristic time corresponding to a point P1 on the striking face, P1 being laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D6 no less than 21.3 mm.
  • 2. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the maximum characteristic time is no less than 250 μs.
  • 3. The golf club head of claim 2, wherein the maximum characteristic time is greater than 257 μs.
  • 4. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein P1 is located toe-ward of the face center.
  • 5. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the geometric center is laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D1 no less than 2 mm.
  • 7. The golf club head of claim 1, further comprising a sweet spot that is laterally spaced from the geometric center by a distance D2 that is no greater than 2 mm.
  • 8. The golf club head of claim 7, wherein the sweet spot is laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D3 that is greater than D2.
  • 9. The golf club head of claim 8, wherein D2/D3 is no greater than 0.5.
  • 10. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the crown comprises alignment indicia that is laterally spaced from the geometric center by a distance no greater than 2 mm.
  • 11. A golf club head that, when oriented in a reference position, comprises: a crown;a sole opposite the crown;a heel portion;a toe portion opposite the heel portion; anda striking face comprising: a heel-wardmost extent;a toe-wardmost extent;a lowermost extent;an uppermost extent;a face center; anda geometric center being a point on the striking face vertically halfway between the uppermost extent and the lowermost extent, and laterally halfway between the heel-wardmost extent and toe-wardmost extent, the geometric center laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D1 no less than 2 mm.
  • 12. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein D1 is no less than 4 mm.
  • 13. The golf club head of claim 11, further comprising a sweet spot that is laterally spaced from the geometric center by a distance D2 that is no greater than 2 mm.
  • 14. The golf club head of claim 13, wherein the sweet spot is laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D3 that is greater than D2.
  • 15. The golf club head of claim 14, wherein D2/D3 is no greater than 0.5.
  • 16. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein the crown comprises alignment indicia that is laterally spaced from the geometric center by a distance D5 no greater than 2 mm.
  • 17. A golf club head that, when oriented in a reference position, comprises: a crown having alignment indicia thereon;a sole opposite the crown;a heel portion;a toe portion opposite the heel portion; anda striking face including a face center located such that the alignment indicia is laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D4 greater than 2 mm.
  • 18. The golf club head of claim 17, wherein D4 is no less than 4 mm.
  • 19. The golf club head of claim 17, wherein the alignment indicia is spaced toe-ward of the face center.
  • 20. The golf club head of claim 17, further comprising: a maximum characteristic time at a point P1 on the striking face, P1 being laterally spaced from the face center by a distance greater than 21.3 mm.
  • 21. The golf club head of claim 20, wherein the maximum characteristic time is greater than 256 μs.
  • 22. The golf club head of claim 20, wherein P1 is located toe-ward of the face center.
  • 23. The golf club head of claim 17, further comprising a sweet spot that is laterally spaced from the face center by a distance D3 greater than 2 mm.
Parent Case Info

This application claims priority to Provisional Application No. 63/617,859, filed on Jan. 5, 2024, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63617859 Jan 2024 US