The present disclosure relates to a golf club head, more particularly to a golf club head having a hollow portion therein.
In order to increase distance of a struck ball, it has been requested that hollow golf club heads, especially golf club heads called fairway woods or hybrids which have a lot of chances striking a ball placed directly on the turf have a low sweet spot height.
The following Patent document 1 discloses a fairway wood type golf club head. The golf club head includes a metal body including a crown, a sole, a hosel, a cavity, a frontal opening, and a protrusion, and a metal face component including a striking face and a return portion.
As to golf club heads having a relatively small head thickness such as fairway woods and hybrids, the inventor made a lot of studies of improving repulsion performance without impairing durability. As a result, the inventor has found that it is important to provide a weight portion extending along a leading edge on an inner surface of a sole portion of a golf club head and a thin wall region between the weight portion and the leading edge, wherein the thin wall region has the maximum thickness associated with a length of the thin wall region in a head front-rear direction.
The present disclosure has been made in view of the above problem and has a major object to provide a golf club head, especially a golf club head being suitable for a fairway wood and hybrid, capable of improving repulsion performance of a lower position of a face portion without impairing durability.
According to one aspect of the disclosure, a golf club head having a hollow portion therein, the golf club head including a face portion for striking a ball, the face portion defining a leading edge, a sole portion extending rearwardly of the club head from the face portion, the sole portion having an inner surface thereof facing the hollow portion, and a club head thickness being equal to or less than 39.0 mm; wherein the sole portion is provided on the inner surface with a weight portion extending along the leading edge and a thin wall region between the leading edge and the weight portion, the thin wall region has a length L of from 14.0 to 23.0 mm in a head front-rear direction, and the thin wall region has a ratio t/L of a maximum thickness t (mm) thereof to the length L (mm) is in a range of from 0.040 to 0.080.
In another aspect of the disclosure, the maximum thickness t of the thin wall region may be in a range of from 0.6 to 1.8 (mm).
In another aspect of the disclosure, the maximum thickness t of the thin wall region may be in a range of from 0.6 to 1.4 mm.
In another aspect of the disclosure, the maximum thickness t of the thin wall region may be in a range of from 0.6 to 1.1 mm.
In another aspect of the disclosure, the weight portion may extend upwardly from the inner surface of the sole portion such that the weight portion protrudes toward the face portion without contacting with the face portion.
In another aspect of the disclosure, the weight portion may be formed by a thick wall portion of the sole portion.
In another aspect of the disclosure, the golf club head may have a weight of from 190 to 240 g.
In another aspect of the disclosure, the golf club head may have a head width which is a maximum length in the head front-rear direction of the club head is in a range of from 60 to 90 mm.
In another aspect of the disclosure, the golf club head may have a sweet spot height equal to or less than 22 mm.
An embodiment of the present disclosure will be explained below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Note that like reference numerals refer to the like elements or parts throughout, and that redundant description of already described elements is omitted.
[Standard State of Head]
In
The standard state of the head 1 is a state in which the head 1 is kept at its loft angle α (shown in
Note that the shaft center line CL is defined as an axial center line of a shaft insertion hole 6a formed on a hosel portion 6 of the head 1.
[Coordinate System of Head]
In the present specification, an x-y-z coordinate system is defined for the head 1 where an x-axis is an axis orthogonal to the vertical plane VP and parallel to the horizontal plane HP, a y-axis is an axis parallel to both vertical plane VP and horizontal plane HP, and a z-axis is an axis orthogonal to both x-axis and y-axis.
Further, directions parallel to the x-axis, the y-axis and the z-axis are respectively defined as a head front-rear direction, a toe-heel direction, and a head up-down direction with respect to the head 1.
[Basic Embodiment of Head]
The head 1 according to the present embodiment is provided therein with a hollow portion i. Further, the head 1 according to the present embodiment is configured as a golf club head which is suitable for striking a ball placed directly on the ground. Such a golf club may include fairway woods or hybrids.
Typically, such a head has a loft angle α equal to or more than 15 degrees, a head volume of from about 100 cc to about 200 cc, a head weight of from about 190 g to about 240 g, and a head width W of from 60 to 90 mm.
Note that the head width W, as shown in
Further, as a golf club head which is suitable for striking a ball placed directly on the ground, the head 1 according to the present embodiment has a club head thickness H equal to or less than 39.0 mm.
The head thickness H is a height from the horizontal plane HP to the maximum height position of the head. This structure can provide a low center of gravity G, providing a low height of the sweet spot SS which is the intersection of the club face 2a and a normal line N drawn to the club face 2a from the center of gravity G of the head. This feature helps to improve repulsion performance of a lower position of the club face 2a.
Note that if the club head thickness H exceeds 39.0 mm, the location of sweet spot SS tends to be higher, and thus repulsion performance is prone to be deteriorated when striking a ball at a lower position of the club face 2a.
Fairway wood type golf club heads include club heads for at least spoon (#3), buffy (#4), clique (#5), other wood type golf clubs (#7 and #9) and the like.
Hybrids, for example, are well known in this technical field as a type of golf clubs with a design borrowing from both irons and woods.
The head 1 includes the face portion 2, a crown portion 3, a sole portion 4, and a side portion 5 which are arranged so as to define the hollow portion i.
For example, the hollow portion i may be a space as it is, or a part of the hollow portion i may be provided with gel composition for adjusting weight.
The face portion 2 forms a front wall of the head 1 to strike a ball, and has the club face 2a which is a surface directly in contact with a ball. The club face 2a is provided with a plurality of grooves called face lines (not illustrated) extending in the toe-heel direction.
The crown portion 3 extends rearwardly from an upper side of the face portion 2 and forms an upper surface of the head. The above-mentioned hosel portion 6 is provided in a heel side of the crown portion 3. The hosel portion 6 is formed in a cylindrical shape having the shaft insertion hole 6a into which a club shaft (not shown) is attached as shown, for example, in
The sole portion 4 extends rearwardly from a lower side of the face portion 2 and forms a bottom face of the head.
The side portion 5 connects the crown portion 3 and the sole portion 4. The toe side and the heel side of the side portion 5 are respectively connected to the toe side and the heel side of the face portion 2.
In the present embodiment, the face portion 2, the crown portion 3, the sole portion 4 and the side portion 5 are made of, for example, a metal material. As the metal material, for example, stainless steel, maraging steel, titanium alloy, magnesium alloy, aluminum alloy and the like can be preferably used. In another embodiment, a part of the head 1 (e.g. the crown portion 3) may be made of a non-metallic material such as fiber reinforced plastic and the like.
The first weight portion 10 is provided on the face portion 2 side in the head front-rear direction. As apparent from a cross-sectional view shown in
In the present embodiment, the first weight portion 10 extends directly from the inner surface 7 of the sole portion 4. Thus, large weight is located on a lower side of the head and the face portion 2 side, enabling to provide a low sweet spot SS. Such a head 1, when striking a ball placed directly on the ground, can provide a sweet spot SS close to a striking position of the club face 2a, exerting high repulsion performance as well as low spin of a hit ball so that the distance increases.
In the present embodiment, the sole portion 4 includes a thin wall region 4a between the leading edge Le which is the forwardmost lower edge of the club face 2a extending in the toe-heel direction and the first weight portion 10, wherein the thin wall region 4a has a maximum thickness defined as “t” (mm). Further, the thin wall region 4a has a length L of from 14.0 to 23.0 mm in the head front-rear direction, and the thin wall region 4a has a ratio t-L of the maximum thickness t (mm) thereof to the length L (mm) is in a range of from 0.040 to 0.080.
The thin wall region 4a of the sole portion 4 tends to deform flexibly upon striking a ball, thus helping to improve repulsion performance of a lower position of the club face 2a further. When the head 1 has a so-called cup-face construction in which a cup shaped club face member and a head main body are welded, a weld bead may exist between the leading edge Le and the first weight portion 10. Such a weld bead has a large thickness unavoidably at least partially. In the present disclosure, the maximum thickness t (mm) is defined as a maximum thickness of a portion except such a weld bead.
The first weight portion 10 includes a front edge 15 defining a front end thereof. The front edge 15 of the first weight portion 10 is a front side connecting edge between the first weight portion 10 and the inner surface 7 of the sole portion 4. A portion of the sole portion 4 that is located between the leading edge Le and the first weight portion 10 is formed by the thin wall region 4a.
It is necessary for the thin wall region 4a to have the length L of from 14.0 to 23.0 mm in the head front-rear direction. For example, since a thickness of the face portion 2 tends to have a small thickness of from about 2 to 3 mm, in the present embodiment, the length L of the thin wall region 4a in the head front-rear direction is defined as a distance from the leading edge Le to the front edge 15 of the first weight portion 10 in the head front-rear direction for convenience sake. Since the head 1 according to the present embodiment has the length L of the thin wall region 4a equal to or more than 14.0 mm which is long enough, the sole portion 4 with the thin wall region 4a can be deform sufficiently when striking a ball on a lower position of the club face 2a. Further, since the length L of the thin wall region 4a is set equal to or less than 23.0 mm, it is possible that the first weight portion 10 is arranged close to the face portion 2. Thus, the head 1 can have low and shallow center of gravity G of the head, enabling to provide low sweet spot SS. Hence, the head 1, when striking a ball placed directly on the ground, can provide a sweet spot SS close to a striking position of the club face 2a, exerting high repulsion performance as well as low spin of a hit ball so that the distance increases.
Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the thin wall region 4a has a ratio t/L of the maximum thickness t (mm) thereof to the length L (mm) in a range of from 0.040 to 0.080.
The present disclosure pays attention to the ratio t/L of the maximum thickness t (mm) of the thin wall region 4a to the length L (mm) of the head front-rear direction while maintaining the length L of the thin wall region 4a in the head front-rear direction of from 14.0 to 23.0 mm. That is, in order to improve repulsion performance of the head 1, it is better that the maximum thickness t (mm) of the thin wall region 4a is as small as possible. However, if it makes the maximum thickness t smaller without considering the length L in the head front-rear direction, durability cannot be ensured. Thus, it is believed that an optimum value of the maximum thickness t of the thin wall region 4a to improve repulsion performance without deteriorating durability varies in accordance with the length L of the thin wall region 4a in the head front-rear direction.
In the present disclosure, based on the above basis, the ratio t/L is set in a range of from 0.040 to 0.080. Hence, in the head 1 with the length L of the thin wall region 4a in the head front-rear direction of from 14.0 to 23.0 mm, high repulsion performance can be exerted without deteriorating durability. Note that the maximum thickness t of the thin wall region 4a is not particularly limited as long as it satisfies the above range. Preferably, the maximum thickness t is in a range of from 0.6 to 1.8 mm, more preferably 0.6 to 1.4 mm, further preferably 0.6 to 1.1 mm.
As long as a value of the ratio t/L satisfies the above range, the ratio t/L may be constant in the toe-heel direction of the thin wall region 4a. Alternatively, a value of the ratio t/L may vary in the toe-heel direction of the thin wall region 4a. For example, a value of the ratio t/L of a middle region of the thin wall region 4a in the toe-heel direction is relatively large with respect to a predetermined value, and a value of the ratio t/L of toe and heel regions in the toe-heel direction of the thin wall region 4a is relatively small with respect to the predetermined value. Generally, repulsion performance of a club head tends to be small as far from the face center FC in the toe-heel direction. The head according to the above embodiment can help to prevent reduction of repulsion performance of the head since the ratio t/L becomes smaller as far from the face center FC in the toe-heel direction.
Further, it is preferable that the above-mentioned thin wall region 4a is formed in a certain region of the head 1 in the toe-heel direction. In some preferred embodiments, as shown in a plan view of
As illustrated in
A height and a location in the head front-rear direction of the center of gravity G of the head can be optimized by adjusting volume and/or the cross-sectional shape of the first weight portion 10. For example, a gravity height from the horizontal plane HP to the center of gravity G of the head is preferably in a range of from 11 to 16 mm. In addition, a gravity depth which is a distance in the head front-rear direction from the leading edge Le of the head 1 to the center of gravity G of the head is preferably in a range of from 29 to 32 mm. Furthermore, a height of the sweet spot SS of the head 1 from the horizontal plane HP, for example, is equal to or less than 22 mm, more preferably from 17 to 22 mm. These features can provide a low sweet spot SS close to a striking point when the club head 1 strikes a ball placed directly on the ground, increasing a distance of a hit ball.
As illustrated in
As apparent from
In some preferred embodiment, in a plan view of the sole portion 4, the concave edge 12 is a circular arc shape having the center located rearwardly of the concave edge 12. This embodiment can optimize the above weight allocation effect, increasing moment of inertia around the z-axis further. Note that the “circular arc shape” includes not only a single radius circular arc shape but also a multiple circular arc shape including a plurality of circular arc shape connected with one another (the same hereinafter).
In some preferred embodiments, in a plan view of the sole portion 4, the center of gravity G of the head may be located within a concave area which is surrounded by the concave edge 12 and a straight-line S connecting both ends in the toe-heel direction of the concave edge 12. Thus, moment of inertia around the z-axis of the head can further be increased while approaching the center of gravity G of the head to the face portion 2.
In some preferred embodiments, moment of inertia of the head 1 around the z-axis is preferably in a range of from 2200 to 2800 g·cm2. Thus, directionality of a hit ball can be improved further.
In the present embodiment, the rear edge 11 of the first weight portion 10, for example, includes a toe-side edge 13 and a heel side edge 14 between which the concave edge 12 is located, and the toe-side edge 13 and the heel side edge 14 extend in substantially parallel with the toe-heel direction. Note that the “substantially” parallel shall mean that the toe-side edge 13 and the heel side edge 14 extend within 10 degrees with respect to the toe-heel direction. These toe-side edge 13 and heel-side edge 14 can allocate more weight to toe and heel sides in the head 1, helping to increase moment of inertia around the x-axis.
[Manufacturing Method of First Weight Portion]
The first weight portion 10, for example, may be formed integrally with the sole portion 4 previously by casting, cutting and the like. In the present embodiment, the first weight portion 10 is formed by a thick wall portion of the sole portion 4. Thus, the first weight portion 10 is made of the same metallic material as that of the sole portion 4.
[Other Embodiments of First Weight Portion]
Next, another embodiment of the sole portion 4 will be explained based on
[Second Weight Portion]
As illustrated in
In the present embodiment, the second weight portion 20 is configured as a localized thick wall portion of the sole portion 4 which is thicker than the maximum thickness t of the thin wall region 4a. Although a thickness of the second weight portion 20 is not particularly limited, the thickness is preferably equal to or more than 1.4 mm, more preferably equal to or more than 1.8 mm. Thus, the second weight portion 20 can allocate weight convergently in the sole portion 4, improving the above effect. Alternatively, the second weight portion 20 may be configured as a weight made of a different metallic material from that of the sole portion 4.
In some preferred embodiments, as illustrated in
In a plan view of the sole portion 4 as illustrated in
In this embodiment, in a plan view of the sole portion 4, the second weight portion 20 includes a rear edge 24 which is a connecting edge between the second weight portion 20 and the inner surface 7 of the sole portion 4 on a side of a rearward contour of the head 1. In this embodiment, the rear edge 24 is also curved in a circular arc shape having the center in a side of the center of gravity G of the head. More specifically, the rear edge 24 of the second weight portion 20, in a plan view of the head, extends along the rearward contour of the head 1. Thus, the second weight portion 20 can allocate more weight to a periphery of the rearward contour of the head.
[Third Weight Portion]
As illustrated in
In this embodiment, the third weight portion 30 is configured as a localized thick wall portion of the sole portion 4 which is thicker than the maximum thickness t of the thin wall region 4a. Although a thickness of the third weight portion 30 is not particularly limited, the thickness is preferably equal to or more than 1.0 mm, more preferably equal to or more than 1.3 mm. Thus, weight of the third weight portion 30 can be allocated convergently to toe side in the sole portion 4, improving the above-mentioned effect. Alternatively, the third weight portion 30 may be configured as a weight made of a different metallic material from that of the sole portion 4.
The third weight portion 30, for example, is provided away from the first weight portion 10 and the second weight portion 20. In other words, a portion that has a thickness thinner than those of the first, second and third weight portions 10, 20 and 30 is provided between the third weight portion 30 and the first weight portion 10, as well as between the third weight portion 30 and the second weight portion 20. Thus, the head 1 can prevent excessive increase of stiffness of the sole portion 4, preventing deterioration of repulsion performance.
In a plan view of the sole portion 4, the third weight portion 30 includes an inner edge 32 which is a connecting edge between the third weight portion 30 and the inner surface 7 of the sole portion 4 on a side of the center of gravity G of the head. In some preferred embodiments, the inner edge 32 of third weight portion 30 is curved in a circular arc shape having the center in a side of the center of gravity G of the head. In the embodiment, weight of the third weight portion 30 can be allocated to a location of the sole portion farther from the center of gravity G of the head, optimizing the above-mentioned weight allocation effect, improving moment of inertia around the z-axis further.
In this embodiment, in a plan view of the sole portion 4, the third weight portion 30 further includes an outer edge 34 which is a connecting edge between the third weight portion 30 and the inner surface 7 of the sole portion 4 on a side of a toe-side contour of the head 1. The outer edge 34 of the third weight portion 30 is also curved in a circular arc shape having the center in a side of the center of gravity G of the head. More specifically, the outer edge 34 of the third weight portion 30 extends along the toe-side contour of the head 1. Thus, the third weight portion 30 can allocate more weight to a periphery of toe-side in the sole portion 4 effectively.
[Fourth Weight Portion]
As illustrated in
In the present embodiment, the fourth weight portion 40 is configured as a localized thick wall portion of the sole portion 4 which is thicker than the maximum thickness t of the thin wall region 4a. Although a thickness of the fourth weight portion 40 is not particularly limited, the thickness is preferably equal to or more than 1.2 mm, more preferably equal to or more than 1.5 mm. Thus, the fourth weight portion 40 can allocate weight convergently in the sole portion 4, improving the above effect. Alternatively, the fourth weight portion 40 may be configured as a weight made of a different metallic material from that of the sole portion 4.
The fourth weight portion 40, for example, is provided away from the first weight portion 10 and the second weight portion 20. In other words, a portion that has a thickness thinner than those of the first, second and fourth weight portions 10, 20 and 40 is provided between the fourth weight portion 40 and the first weight portion 10, as well as between the fourth weight portion 40 and the second weight portion 20. Thus, the head 1 can prevent excessive increase of stiffness of the sole portion 4, preventing deterioration of repulsion performance.
In a plan view of the sole portion 4, the fourth weight portion 40 includes an inner edge 42 which is a connecting edge between the fourth weight portion 40 and the inner surface 7 of the sole portion 4 on a side of the center of gravity G of the head. In some preferred embodiments, the inner edge 42 of fourth weight portion 40 is curved in a circular arc shape having the center in a side of the center of gravity G of the head. In the embodiment, weight of the fourth weight portion 40 can be allocated to a location of the sole portion farther from the center of gravity G of the head, optimizing the above-mentioned weight allocation effect, improving moment of inertia around the z-axis further.
In a plan view of the sole portion 4, the fourth weight portion 40 further includes an outer edge 44 which is a connecting edge between the fourth weight portion 40 and the inner surface 7 of the sole portion 4 on a side of a heel-side contour of the head. The outer edge 44 of the fourth weight portion 40 is also curved in a circular arc shape having the center on the side of the center of gravity G of the head. More specifically, the outer edge 44 of the fourth weight portion 40 extends along the heel-side contour of the head 1. Thus, the fourth weight portion 40 can allocate more weight to a periphery of heel side of the sole portion 4 effectively.
[Combination of Weight Portions]
In the embodiment shown in
While the particularly preferred embodiments in accordance with the disclosure have been described in detail above, the present disclosure is not limited to the above embodiments but can be modified and carried out in various aspects within the scope of the disclosure.
Hollow fairway wood type golf club heads (#3) shown in
As to repulsion performance of the heads, in order to evaluate repulsion performance of the head when striking a ball placed directly on the ground, a ratio of COR (coefficient of restitution) on a lower position of the club face to COR on the center of the club face was used. Here, the lower position of the club face is a position that is located on a vertical line passing through the face center and that is located 16 mm above from the horizontal surface on which the club head under the standard state is placed. Note that this position is below the face center as well as the sweet spot. Repulsion performance becomes smaller as it goes away from the face center. Thus, a value of the ratio being closer to 1 indicates better repulsion performance at the lower position of the club face. Note that COR of the respective striking positions were measured according to the procedure specified by “Procedure for Measuring the Velocity Ratio of a Club Head for Conformance to Rule 4-1e, Revision 2 (Feb. 8, 1999)” of the United States Golf Association.
As to durability of the heads, the respective club head were attached to the same golf shafts to construct golf clubs, and then, a striking test was conducted using a swing robot such that each golf club strikes balls repeatedly at head-speed of 47 m/s. Then, while checking status of club heads every one hundred striking, the number of striking of each golf club until damage occurs on the club face and/or a periphery of the club face was measured. The test results are shown in Table 1.
From the test results, it is confirmed that the club heads of examples provide low sweet spot and high repulsion performance.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2018-245359 | Dec 2018 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6254494 | Hasebe | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296576 | Capelli | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6945877 | Kobayashi | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7004852 | Billings | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7258626 | Gibbs | Aug 2007 | B2 |
8257195 | Erickson | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8328661 | Erickson | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8636610 | Golden | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8900070 | Dawson | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8926448 | Ivanova | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9211451 | Westrum | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9687701 | Seluga | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9782642 | DeMille | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9802084 | Shimahara | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9802086 | Kato | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9839817 | Johnson | Dec 2017 | B1 |
10343031 | Day | Jul 2019 | B1 |
11065511 | Aramaki | Jul 2021 | B2 |
20030034142 | Bliss | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060172818 | Yamamoto | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070129167 | Matsunaga | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080176674 | Horacek | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100048324 | Wada | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100120556 | Yamamoto | May 2010 | A1 |
20110021289 | Yokota | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110151989 | Golden | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177881 | Hayase | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110312440 | Wada | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120142450 | Wada | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120142452 | Burnett | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120252601 | Thomas | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120302368 | Nishio | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302369 | Ban | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120322580 | Wada | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130130831 | Morales | May 2013 | A1 |
20130130832 | Morales | May 2013 | A1 |
20130210542 | Harbert | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130316848 | Burnett | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140106903 | Nakamura | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150065265 | Motokawa | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150094163 | Motokawa | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150265885 | Hettinger | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150273290 | Motokawa | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160114228 | Jertson | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160250525 | Motokawa | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170050091 | Shimahara | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180161645 | Yoshida | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180185714 | Jertson | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190022472 | Del Rosario | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190255393 | Mizutani | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190290972 | Del Rosario | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200094116 | Kato | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
5982555 | Aug 2016 | JP |
2013158146 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200206586 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |