Golf club equipment design is an area in which balance must be struck between the traditional appearance and performance level of equipment, yet satisfy the steady demand of golfers for innovations which increase the enjoyment and excitement of the sport. Along these lines, where shot distance is often limited by rules promulgated by organizations sanctioning acceptable equipment use in tournament play, attention is often turned to other areas in which golf equipment may be made more suitable for golfers. One such area is increasing the overall forgiveness of golf clubs, thus increasing enjoyment of the game particularly for golfers with higher handicaps. Another area, particularly in the case of iron-type golf club heads or club heads lofted in the range of 20 to 50 degrees, is consistency in feel and distance gapping.
A need exists for an iron-type or hybrid-type golf club head, or mixed set thereof, that judiciously provides competitive performance values so that structural integrity is ensured and abundant discretionary weight is freed for providing consistency in feel and distance gapping.
An iron-type golf club head according to an example of the disclosure may include a heel, a toe, a top portion, a sole portion, a rear portion, and a striking wall. The striking wall includes a striking face, having a plurality of scorelines and a face center, and a rear surface. A minimum striking wall thickness T min is no greater than 2.5 min. A thickened central region of the striking wall has a maximum thickness, T max, greater than T min but no greater than 2.75. A first thickness T1 of the striking wall corresponds with a first location spaced toe-ward from the face center by a first distance D1 of between 20 mm and 30 mm. A second thickness T2 of the striking wall corresponds with a second location spaced heel-ward from the face center by the first distance D1 such that T1 is greater than T2 by no less than 0.05 mm.
In another example of the present disclosure, a set of golf club heads may include a first golf club head and a second golf club head. The first golf club head comprises a hollow-type golf club head and has a first loft between 18° and 28°. The second golf club head comprises a cavity-back golf club head and has a second loft between 34° and 50°. Each golf club head of the set comprises a center of gravity and a moment of inertia, Izz, about a virtual vertical axis passing through the center of gravity. The standard deviation of all the moments of inertia of the golf club heads is no greater than 100 g*cm2.
In another example of the present disclosure, a set of golf club heads may include at least one hollow-type golf club head and at least one cavity-back golf club head. At least two differently-lofted golf club heads of the set each comprise a striking face, a loft, L, a center of gravity spaced from the striking by a depth, Dcg, and a moment of inertia, Izz, about a virtual vertical axis passing through the center of gravity. The following inequality is satisfied: 2.2017*L2−63.276*L+3500≤Izz/Dcg≤2.2017*L2−63.276*L+4200, wherein: L is measured in degrees, Izz is measured in g*cm2, and Dcg is measured in cm.
These and other features and advantages of the invention in its various aspects and demonstrated by one or more of the various examples will become apparent after consideration of the ensuing description, the accompanying drawings, and the appended claims.
The following examples will be described using one or more definitions, provided below.
One goal of a set of irons is to enable a golfer to consistently achieve a desired shot distance in association with a selected loft with adequate dispersion. Accordingly, the set of irons should preferably enable the golfer to achieve shot distances at a relatively consistent increment to provide a versatility necessary for typical course play.
Properly incrementing shot distance and/or feel of golf club heads of a set of golf clubs that are similar in appearance and structure has been carried out with relatively acceptable results. However, in the particular case where golf clubs of a set greatly vary in appearance and/or structure within a set, achieving consistent feel, forgiveness, and distance gapping is a greater challenge.
Recently, for various reasons, golfers have tended toward replacing long irons with hybrid-style or hollow-type irons or utility clubs. Whereas some golfers may struggle with conventionally structured long irons, hybrid style or utility type clubs may provide some advantages. For example, the metal wood structure allows for a striking face with bulge and/or roll, which in combination with the phenomenon of “gear effect” provides greater forgiveness on shots hit off-centered. Furthermore, along similar lines, the larger footprint of these type of clubs naturally imparts greater moment of inertia (MOI), particularly about a virtual vertical axis passing through a center of gravity of the club head. Increasing moment of inertia is generally correlated with increasing the club head's natural resistance to rotation on off-centered golf ball impacts. Finally, some believe that the broader structure of hybrid and utility type club heads improves turf interaction and provides greater stability and consistency in the orientation of the golf club head at impact with a golf ball
For at least the above reasons, substitution of long irons with hybrid-, hollow-, and/or utility-type golf clubs is gaining in popularity. As a corollary, it is beneficial to design and offer, as a single set, a correlated plurality of golf clubs that are “mixed,” i.e. contain one or more hybrid-, hollow-, and/or utility-type golf clubs and one or more traditionally-shaped golf club, e.g. of a solid cavity-back or blade-type structure.
Referring to
Preferably, at least one, more preferably at least two, and most preferably at least three of the club heads of the set constitute hollow-type, hybrid-type, or utility-club type club heads (collectively referred to as hollow-type irons herein). Additionally, such hollow-type club heads preferably constitute the lowest-lofted (i.e. longest) iron club heads of the set. Likewise, preferably, at least one, more preferably at least two, and most preferably at least three of the club heads of the set constitute cavity back (and also preferably solidly formed or non-hollow) club heads. In similar manner, the cavity-back club heads preferably constitute the higher-lofted club heads of the set. For example, the #3 through #5 constitute hollow-type irons, while the #5 through PW constitute cavity-back (and solid) irons.
As described above, various advantages arise from substituting low-lofted irons with hollow-type club heads. However, along with such advantages to such substitution, various detriments may naturally arise such as greater distinction in the feel, forgiveness and shot distance achievable between hollow type club heads and cavity-back club heads thereby presenting shortcomings in the playability of the set as a whole that may hinder a golfer's success and focus throughout the game.
One particular need identified as alleviating such shortcomings is to increase discretionary mass. As used herein, provided a specified mass budget for a club head, some proportion of the specified mass must be relegated to structural mass, i.e. the minimum necessary amount of mass necessary to establish the club head's structural integrity. The remaining mass, e.g. the difference between a prescribed mass budget and structural mass may be considered discretionary mass. Discretionary mass may be considered mass which may function primarily to affect the overall mass properties of the club head, e.g. location of a center of gravity, MOI, principle axes of inertia, etc., as will be described in further detail below.
One area of particular interest for mass relocation is mass associated with forming a striking wall of the club head. On one hand, mass removal from the striking wall may result in greater performance (e.g. average shot distance). On another hand, as the striking wall generally constitutes the front portion of the club head, mass removal and relocation therefrom would likely naturally cause the center of gravity to move further rearward. This may be advantageous in and of itself in that a rearward center of gravity may be considered preferable in terms of spin generation, dynamic loft and a higher sweet spot location. Furthermore, all else being equal, shifting the center of gravity further rearward generally results in a greater MOI, particularly about a virtual vertical axis passing through the center of gravity of the club head (i.e. Izz).
For these reasons, one or more club heads, and preferably the hollow-type irons, of the set include a striking wall having non-uniform face thickness, particularly configured in a manner that minimizes unnecessary mass, facilitates machining, and maintains or improves performance (e.g. shot distance).
A hollow-type club head 100 (in particular the #3 iron) is shown in
Unless otherwise specified, all aspects of the club heads shown and described herein are defined with the club head oriented in a reference position relative to a virtual ground plane 10 (see
Referring specifically to
The interior cavity 180 of one or more of the hollow-type club heads may include one or more ribs 182 secured to either an interior surface of the top portion, the sole portion and/or extending entirely from the top portion to the sole portion. Such ribs may be beneficial in improving the structural stability of the club head and tuning sound and vibratory emanations of the club head which may result from impact with a golf ball during the course of play.
Preferably, the striking face, in embodiments in which it comprises a discrete, separate, and optionally aft-attached component, comprises a high-strength steel, e.g. HT-1770 steel. However, other alternatives may also be suitable.
The filler material, in such embodiments (and not shown), may comprise a lightweight metal, e.g. aluminum, and/or a polymeric material such as an elastomer, open or closed cell foam, ionomer, polyurethane, PBAX, or resin. The main body preferably comprises a stainless steel but may alternatively comprise titanium.
The striking face preferably includes a plurality of scorelines 162 for purposes of alignment and removal of debris and/or increasing backspin and/or consistency of a golf shot. The scorelines define a heelward extent 163, a toe-ward extent 164, an upper extent 165, and a lower extent 166. The striking face further defines a face center 168 being the point along the face laterally equidistant between the heel-ward extent and the toe-ward extent and vertically equidistant between the upper extent and the lower extent.
As described above, and with reference to
Notably, the degree of tapering of thickness outward of the face center 168 is asymmetric in both the heel-to-toe (lateral) direction as well as the vertical direction (in this case, vertical being considered with the striking face rotated to be parallel with the plane of the paper). Referring to
Preferably, at a location within 20 mm from the face center, more preferably within 15 mm from the face center, the striking wall exhibits a maximum thickness (e.g. 2.5 mm). Additionally, at a location spaced laterally toe-ward from the face center by a distance D1 of 20 mm to 30 mm, more preferably 22 mm to 28 mm, and most preferably about 25 mm, the striking wall exhibits a first thickness T1 of 2.4 mm, whereas at a same lateral distance D1 heel-ward of the face center, the striking wall exhibits a thickness T2 less than T1, preferably by at least 0.05 mm. T2 is preferably equal to about 2.3 mm.
As shown in
In addition to the above attributes, or alternatively, the striking wall exhibits a minimum thickness T min no greater than 2.5 mm, more preferably no greater than 2.3 mm, and most preferably equal to or about 2.2 mm. Additionally, the striking wall preferably exhibits a central thickened portion that contains of itself a maximum thickness T max that is greater that T min by at least 0.20 mm, more preferably by at least 0.25 mm. T max may additionally correspond to the maximum thickness of the striking wall as a whole. Preferably, T max in any such case is no greater than 2.75 mm.
As described above, the variously described variable thickness striking wall embodiments beneficially remove mass from the striking face in a manner that may preserve the structural integrity and performance characteristics of the face. Such removal increases the overall discretionary mass of the golf club heads, which is particularly significant for hollow-type low-lofted irons, so that such mass may be employed to adapt the feel of these clubs to better match that of the higher-lofted cavity-back club heads e.g. in terms of vibratory characteristics, moment of inertia, and distance gapping, collectively considered “blending.” Furthermore, the hollow-type club heads of the set may be better adapted to make use of discretionary mass in that greater space is available within the interior cavity for re-location of mass via integrally thickened regions and/or weight inserts poured therein and/or welded/brazed or other adhered thereon. On the other hand, the cavity-back type club heads, by virtue of their structure may particularly benefit from an insert or plaque positioned on the rear surface of each striking wall. Such plaque may beneficially absorb vibration upon impact or as clubs may interact when stored in a golf bag. For such reasons, a variable face thickness pattern as described above with particular regard to the hollow-type club heads may additionally be considered particularly non-preferable with regard to the cavity-back type club heads in that they may result in difficulties in adhesion between such plaque or insert and the rear surface of the striking face.
In terms of such blending, as a threshold matter, moment of inertia of the club head (i.e. the club head's resistance to rotation on off-centered shots) is preferably maintained relatively consistent from club head to club head throughout the set. Izz of at least two, more preferably at least three, and most preferably for each club head of the set, is preferably at least 2525 g*cm2, more preferably between about 2525 g*cm2 and 2800 g*cm2.
Additionally, or alternatively, such Izz preferably does not significantly vary between club heads throughout the set. In other words, the standard deviation of Izz values for all club heads in the set is preferably no greater than 100 g*cm2, more preferably no greater than 80 g*cm2, and even more preferably no greater than 75 g*cm2. A plot of variation in Izz in the club heads according to the present disclosure and in comparative club heads is shown on the chart presented in
Moment of inertia, considered in isolation, may be a useful attribute in blending a set of irons sufficiently to satisfy golfers' perceptions. However, through empirical study, the present inventors believe that an even more effective measure of blended-ness lies in considering the combination of moment of inertia and location of the center of gravity 175 (see
Accordingly, in combination of, or alternatively to, the above MOI attributes, the golf club heads of the set preferably satisfy various relationships governing CG location thereof.
In particular, at least two, preferably at least three, and more preferably each, of the club heads of the set of golf club heads have their centers of gravity 175 positioned in such manner to satisfy the following equation (where loft is in degrees and Dcg is in mm):
Dcg≥−0.0648*L+7.6.
An exemplary graph showing Dcg values correlated with loft for each club head of the set of club heads of the embodiment of
Further, in addition to any of the above embodiments, a ratio of Izz to Dcg is preferably particularly considered in achieving a set of mixed club heads having both hollow-type club heads and solid, cavity-back type club heads. For example, preferably at least two, more preferably at least three, and most preferably all, club heads of the set of iron-type club heads is configured to satisfy the following relationship (where Izz is in g*cm2, Dcg is in cm, and loft is in degrees):
Izz/Dcg≤2.2017*L2−63.276*L+4200.
More preferably, at least two, more preferably at least three, and most preferably all, clubs heads of the set of iron-type club heads is configured to satisfy the following relationship (where Izz is in g*cm2, Dcg is in cm, and loft is in degrees):
2.2017*L2−63.276*L+3500≤Izz/Dcg≤2.2017*L2−63.276*L+4200.
Even more preferably, at least two, more preferably at least three, and most preferably all, club heads of the set of iron-type club heads are configured to satisfy the following relationship (where Izz is in g*cm2, Dcg is in cm, and loft is in degrees):
2.2017*L2−63.276*L+3600≤Izz/Dcg≤2.2017*L2−63.276*L+4000.
An exemplary graph showing Izz/Dcg values correlated with loft for each club head of the set of club heads of the embodiment of
Table #2 below is an exemplary table providing such attributes for one embodiment of the present disclosure:
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, a set of irons (e.g. designations of #3 through PW) includes a full set of hollow-type club heads, one exemplary club head of such set shown in
The golf club head 200 shown in
Referring particularly to
While various features have been described in conjunction with the examples outlined above, various alternatives, modifications, variations, and/or improvements of those features and/or examples may be possible. Accordingly, the examples, as set forth above, are intended to be only illustrative. Various changes may be made without departing from the broad spirit and scope of the underlying principles.
This is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 16/703,956 filed Dec. 5, 2019, which in turn claims benefit of provisional Application No. 62/873,630 filed Jul. 12, 2019. The entire disclosures of the prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1257471 | Fitzjohn et al. | Feb 1918 | A |
4840380 | Kajita et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5674133 | Chang | Oct 1997 | A |
5971868 | Kosmatka | Oct 1999 | A |
6290607 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6602147 | Shiraishi | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6780123 | Tasebe | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6830519 | Reed et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7137903 | Best et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7553241 | Park et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7614964 | Matsunaga | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7651414 | Rae et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7938736 | Park et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8187118 | Matsunaga et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8206242 | Jertson et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8272974 | Mickelson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8435132 | Oldknow | May 2013 | B2 |
8535177 | Wahl | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8727909 | Guerrette et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9168436 | Slaughter | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9387374 | Golden et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9750993 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9814950 | Lytle | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9981168 | Ines et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10065087 | Sander et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10155145 | Girard et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10173106 | Slaughter et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20030181259 | Shimazaki | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050085312 | Nagai | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060116219 | Hirano | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20100137072 | Kumamoto | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20130252754 | Bazzel et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20180345091 | Sander et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20220001249 | Lambeth | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001-198243 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2003-320061 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2012213607 | Nov 2012 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Oct. 5, 2020 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/703,956. |
Oct. 26, 2020 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/703,956. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210170241 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62873630 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16703956 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17179888 | US |