1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a golf club head durability of which has been improved by providing a crown-side thick-walled rib and a sole-side thick-walled rib on an inner surface of the head.
2. Description of the Background Art
In recent years have been proposed various golf club heads having a hollow structure including a face portion including a central thick-walled part with a large thickness and a peripheral thin-walled part with a small thickness which surrounds the central thick-walled part (see Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2002-315854). Such a golf club head has an advantage that because of presence of the peripheral thin-walled part, reduction of resilience performance can be controlled even during a mishit in which a golf ball is hit at a position which is off a center of a face. However, such a face portion tends to have low durability at a boundary part between the central thick-walled part and the peripheral thin-walled part.
In order to prevent the drawback as described above, structure of the face portion in which a plurality of reinforcing ribs radially extends from the central thick-walled part is proposed (see Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2003-290398 or Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2009-247497). However, since any reinforcing ribs in these heads terminate within the face, there is further room for improvement in durability.
The present invention has been made in light of the actual circumstances described above, and a principal object of the present invention is to provide a golf club head which can improve durability basically by providing in an inner surface of the head a crown-side thick-walled rib which extends from a central thick-walled part provided in a central region of a face portion to a side of a back face in a crown portion beyond a face and a sole-side thick-walled rib which extends from the central thick-walled part to the side of the back face in a sole portion beyond the face.
According to the present invention, a golf club head having a hollow structure comprises
a face portion which has a face to hit a golf ball,
a crown portion which connects to an upper edge of the face and forms a top surface of the head,
a sole portion which connects to a lower edge of the face and forms a bottom surface of the head, and
a side portion between the crown portion and the sole portion, which extends from a toe-side edge of the face to a heel-side edge of the face through a back face of the head, wherein
the face portion is provided in a central region thereof with a central thick-walled part having a thickness of 3.1 to 4.2 mm, and
an inner surface of the head including a back surface of the face portion is provided with a crown-side thick-walled rib and a sole-side thick-walled rib,
the crown-side thick-walled rib including an upper face rib which is disposes in the face portion and extends from the central thick-walled part to a peripheral edge of the back surface of the face portion on a crown portion side, and
a crown rib which is disposed in the crown portion and extends backwardly of the head from the upper face rib, and
the sole-side thick-walled rib including
a lower face rib which is disposes in the face portion and extends from the central thick-walled part to a peripheral edge of the back surface of the face portion on a sole portion side and
a sole rib which is disposed in the sole portion and extends backwardly of the head from the lower face rib.
In a golf club head of the present invention, a central thick-walled part with a thickness of 3.1 to 4.2 mm is provided in a central region of a face portion. Such a golf club head improves durability of the central region of the face portion which is subjected to the greatest impact during hitting. In addition, an inner surface of the head including a back surface of the face portion has a crown-side thick-walled rib including an upper face rib which extends from the central thick-walled part to a peripheral edge of the back surface of the face portion on a side of a crown portion and a crown rib which connects to the upper face rib and extends to a side of a back face in the crown portion, and a sole-side thick-walled rib including a lower face rib which extends from the central thick-walled part to a peripheral edge of the back surface of the face portion on a side of a sole portion and a sole rib which connects to the lower face rib and extends to the side of the back face in the sole portion. A golf club head having such ribs not only effectively reinforces a boundary part between the face portion and the sole portion and a boundary part between the face portion and the crown portion where a strain is easy to concentrate, but also can reinforce the crown portion or sole portion simultaneously. Therefore, the golf club head of the present invention has improved durability.
a) and
a) and
One embodiment of the present invention will be described hereinafter based on the drawings.
It is assumed that a head 1 in each figure is placed in a reference state. Here, the reference state shall be a state in which, as shown in
The golf club head (which may be hereinafter simply referred to as a “head” or a “club head”) 1 of the embodiment is formed as a wood type which includes a face portion 3 having on a front side a face 2 which is a surface to hit a golf ball, a crown portion 4 connecting to an upper edge 2a of the face 2 and forming a top surface of the head, a sole portion 5 connecting to a lower edge 2b of the face 2 and forming a bottom surface of the head, a side portion 6 extending through a back face BF from a toe side edge 2c of the face 2 to a heel side edge 2d between the crown portion 4 and the sole portion 5, and a hosel portion 7 with a shaft insertion hole 7a to which a shaft (not shown) is mounted, and inside of which a hollow part (i) is provided. In addition, when no shaft is mounted to the club head 1, a centerline of the shaft insertion hole 7a is used as the shaft axis centerline CL.
From a standpoint of improving directionality of a hit golf ball by increasing moment of inertia and the depth of the center of gravity, it is desired that the volume of the club head 1 is preferably 380 cm3 or more, more preferably 400 cm3 or more, and even more preferably 420 cm3 or more. On the other hand, since there are problems of degradation of swing balance, reduction of durability, violation of golf rules and the like as the volume of the club head 1 increases, it is desired that the volume of the club head 1 is preferably 470 cm3 or less and more preferably 4603 cm or less. The head volume herein shall be the volume of the entire head surrounded by outer surfaces of the head obtained by filling the shaft insertion hole 7a of a hosel portion 7.
From the standpoint of making it easier to swing in a timely manner by controlling an excessive increase in mass, while ensuring strength, it is desired that an overall weight of the club head 1 is preferably 180 g or more and more preferably 185 g or more. On the other hand, if the overall weight increases, a golfer may not follow through on his swing when swinging, thus deteriorating a flight distance or directionality of a hit ball. From such a standpoint, it is desired that the overall weight of the club head 1 is preferably 220 g or less and more preferably 215 g or less.
As shown in
In the embodiment, for example, the face member 1A is formed like an almost cup shape including a substantially entire region of the face portion 3, and an extended portion 9b extending backward of the head in small length from each edge 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d of the face 2. The extended portion 9 includes a crown-side extended portion 9a, a sole-side extended portion 9b, toe-side extended portion 9c, and a heel-side extended portion 9d.
The head main portion 1B is configured by integrally having a portion of the club head 1 from which the face member 1A is excluded, i.e., a crown rear 4b, a sole rear 5b, and a side rear 6b, which form a main part of a rear side of the crown portion 4, the sole portion 5, and the side portion 6, respectively, and including the hosel portion 7.
As a metallic material used in the face member 1A and the head main portion 1B, for example, a stainless alloy, maraging steel, titanium, a titanium alloy, a magnesium alloy or an aluminum alloy, in particular, which have great specific strength is desirable. Above all, as a titanium alloy, for example, Ti-6AI-4V, Ti-15V-3Cr-3AI-3Sn, Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3AI, or Ti-13V-11Cr-3AI and the like is preferred. In addition, although the face portion 1A and the head main portion 1B may be formed of different metallic materials, a combination of metallic materials which can be welded to each other is preferred.
In addition, as shown in
In the embodiment, the face portion 3 includes a central thick-walled part 10 with a thickness Tc (as shown in
When the thickness Tc of the central thick-walled part 10 is less than 3.1 mm, the central region of the face portion is susceptible to breakage or damage due to impact when a golf ball is hit, and durability deteriorates. In contrast, when the thickness Tc exceeds 4.2 mm, resilience performance deteriorates and the club mass increases, and thus easiness to swing deteriorates. From such a standpoint, it is desired that the thickness Tc is preferably 3.2 mm or more and more preferably 3.3 mm or more, and preferably 4.1 mm or less and more preferably 4.0 mm or less. In addition, in the embodiment, although the thickness Tc is formed of substantially constant thickness, it may be changed within the range, as appropriate. In addition, thickness of each portion of the face portion 3 shall be measured with the face groove or the punch mark filled.
In addition, as shown in
In addition, in order to improve durability of the face portion 3 in a balanced manner, the central thick-walled part 10 of the embodiment is formed like a long ellipse or an oval in a toe-heel direction almost along the contour shape of the peripheral edge 3e of the back surface of the face portion. In addition, from the standpoint that can strike a balance between high durability and excellent resilience of the entire face, in the central thick-walled part 10 of the embodiment, as shown in
In addition, in order to improve durability of the face portion 3, easiness to swing of a golf club, and resilience performance in a balanced manner, it is desired that area of the central thick-walled part 10 is preferably 13% or more and more preferably 15% or more, and preferably 30% or less and more preferably 25% or less of the entire area of the face back surface 3F. In addition, as a matter of convenience, area of the face back surface 3F or the area Ac of the face portion 3 (in addition to these areas, this also applies to any area of each portion to be described below) shall be obtained from a two dimensional shape which is projection of a corresponding region on a vertical plane VP as shown in
As shown in
Such a club head 1 effectively reinforces a boundary part 3a of the face portion 3 and the crown portion 4 and a boundary part 3b of the face portion 3 and the sole portion 5 where a strain is easy to concentrate. In addition, since ribs are also provided in the crown portion 4 or the sole portion 5, front-back rigidity or torsional rigidity of the members can be reinforced simultaneously. Therefore, the golf club head 1 of the present invention has considerably improved durability. In addition, by extending the thick-walled ribs 11, 12 to the crown portion and the sole portion, vibration in the face portion 3 during an off-center shot is blocked by the central thick-walled part 10 or thick-walled ribs 11, 12 having great thickness. Thus, during an off-center shot, a vibrating region of the face portion 3 is limited to a thin-walled part 13 on a toe side part or a thin-walled part 13 on a heel side part having small thickness. Therefore, in the club head 1 of the embodiment, reduction of resilience performance during an off-center shot can be minimized. In addition, in the specification, the “rib” is one which extends with certain width on the inner surface 1n of the head and whose thickness is formed greater than other parts. Therefore, strength of a part in which the “rib” is provided is made higher than the other parts.
In the embodiment, it is desired that the central thick-walled part 10, the crown-side thick-walled rib 11, and the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 satisfy the following expressions (4) and (5):
Tc≧Tru, Trd (4)
Wc≧Wru, Wrd (5)
The symbols are as follows:
Tc: Thickness of the central thick-walled part (mm)
Tru: Average thickness of the crown-side thick-walled rib (mm)
Trd: Average thickness of the sole-side thick-walled rib (mm)
Wc: Maximum width of the central thick-walled part in the toe-heel direction (mm)
Wru: width of the crown-side thick-walled rib in the toe-heel direction (mm)
Wrd: width of the sole-side thick-walled rib in the toe-heel direction (mm)
More specifically, average thickness and width (this shall be maximum width when it varies) of the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 and the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 are formed to be below thickness (this shall be minimum thickness when thickness varies and applies to the following as well) and maximum width of the central thick-walled part 10. When the thickness of Tru and Trd of respective thick-walled ribs 11 and 12 become greater than the thickness Tc of the central thick-walled part 10, rigidity of a peripheral part of the central thick-walled part 10 becomes too great, which easily results in significant reduction of a flight distance during a mishit.
On the other hand, when the thickness of Tru and Trd of respective thick-walled ribs 11 and 12 is too small, durability of a peripheral region of the face portion 3 may degrade. From such a standpoint, it is desired that each of a ratio Tru/Tc of the average thickness of the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 to the thickness of the central thick-walled part 10 and a ratio Trd/Tc of the average thickness of the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 to the thickness of the central thick-walled part 10, are preferably 90% or more and more preferably 93% or more or preferably 97% or less and more preferably 95% or less. Similarly, it is desired that a ratio Wru/Wc of the width Wru of the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 to the width we of the central thick-walled part 10 and a ratio Wrd/Wc of the width Wrd of the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 to the width we of the central thick-walled part 10 are preferably 0.125 or more and more preferably 0.15 or more, or preferably 0.4 or less and more preferably 0.35 or less.
Both of the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 and the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 of the embodiment extend by the width Wru, Wrd, which are substantially constant, in the toe-heel direction. The “substantially constant” mentioned above means that the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 and the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 are formed with constant width, for 80% or more and more preferably 90% or more of length along the width centerline thereof.
As shown in
As shown in
In addition, as shown by black circles in
In addition, as shown in
As shown in
In addition, it is desired that each width Wfu, Wfd of the upper face rib 11a and the lower face rib 12a is formed smaller than the maximum width we of the central thick-walled part 10. This can reliably improve strength of the central region of the face portion 3 and prevent a reduction in a coefficient of restitution of the club head. From such a standpoint, it is desired that the ratio Wfu/Wc and the ratio Wfd/Wc of each width are preferably 0.2 or more and more preferably 0.25 or more or preferably 0.5 or less and more preferably 0.45 or less.
In the embodiment, for thickness of each portion of the crown-side thick-walled rib 11, the sole-side thick-walled rib 12, the crown rib 11b, and the sole rib 12b, that satisfying the following expressions (1) to (3) is desirable:
Tru, Trd>Tcrt (1)
Tru, Trd>Tsrt (2)
Tsrt>Tcrt (3)
The symbols are as follows:
Tcrt: Average thickness of the crown rib (mm)
Tsrt: Average thickness of the sole rib (mm)
More specifically, as shown in
From the standpoint of ensuring the function effect mentioned above, it is desired that a ratio Tru/Tcrt of the average thickness of the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 and the average thickness of the crown rib 11b, and a ratio Trd/Tcrt of the average thickness of the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 and the average thickness of the crown rib 11b are preferably 1.2 or more and more preferably 1.23 or more, or preferably 1.5 or less and more preferably 1.45 or less. Similarly, it is desired that a ratio Tru/Tsrt of the average thickness of the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 and the average thickness of the sole rib 12b and a ratio Trd/Tsrt of the average thickness of the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 and the average thickness of the sole rib 12b are preferably 1.1 or more and more preferably 1.15 or more, or preferably 1.45 or less and more preferably 1.4 or less.
In addition, since the sole portion 5 comes into contact with the ground in many chances during a swing, it is required to have greater rigidity than the crown portion 4. Therefore, the sole portion 5 is reinforced and durability improves, by making thickness of the sole rib 12b greater than the thickness of the crown rib 11b, as in the expression (3). In addition, as the mass of the sole portion 5 is greater than the mass of the crown portion 4, the center of gravity of the head 1 can be lowered.
In addition, as the mass of the crown portion is too much when the ratio Tcrt/Tsrt of the average thicknesses of the crown rib 11b and the sole rib 12b increases, the head's center of gravity may be higher. In contrast, when the ratio Tcrt/Tsrt is small, the reinforcing effect on the crown portion 4 may degrade and durability may not be ensured. From such a standpoint, it is desired that the ratio Tcrt/Tsrt is preferably 0.7 or more and more preferably 0.73 or more, and preferably 0.95 or less and more preferably 0.9 or less.
To have the function effect mentioned above work, it is desirable to provide actual thickness of each rib in addition to provision of the average thickness, although the actual thickness is not particularly limited. More specifically, it is desired that the actual thickness of the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 is preferably 2.7 mm or more, and preferably 3.1 mm or less. In addition, the actual thickness of the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 is preferably 2.8 mm or more and preferably 3.1 mm or less. Similarly, it is desired that the actual thickness of the crown rib 11b is preferably 1.8 mm or more and preferably less than 2.7 mm. Similarly, it is desired that the actual thickness of the sole rib 12b is preferably 2.0 mm or more and preferably less than 2.8 mm.
In addition, as shown in
In addition, as the crown rib 11b and the sole rib 12b of the embodiment are formed to sandwich the center of gravity G of the head 1 in the toe-heel direction, the weight of the crown rib 11b and the weight of the sole rib balance each other, a position of the center of gravity of the head 1 does not change easily. Therefore, in the head 1 of the embodiment, a distance of the center of gravity GK does not change much and any change of the club characteristics is kept low. In addition, the “distance of the center of gravity GK” is the shortest distance from the axis centerline CL of the shaft insertion hole 7a to the head's center of gravity G.
In addition, in the planar view, the crown rib 11b and the sole rib 12b of the embodiment extend parallel to each other and for substantially the same length in the head front-back direction. In addition, as described above, the sole rib 12b has a thickness greater that of than the crown rib 11b. Thus, such a club head 1 can lower the center of gravity of the head 1, while improving durability of the sole portion 5 which comes into contact with the ground in many chances when a golf ball is hit. In addition, the “substantially the same length” includes a case in which lengths of the crown rib 11b and of the sole rib 12b are exactly the same or a case in which length from the vertical plane VP to an end of the crown rib 11b and length from the vertical plane VP to the sole rib 12b are the same.
In addition, as shown in
In addition, it is desired that width Wcr of the crown rib 11b and width Wsr of the sole rib 12b in the toe-heel direction (maximum width if they change) is preferably 7 mm or more and more preferably 10 mm or more, and preferably 25 mm or less and more preferably 20 mm or less. In addition, from the standpoint of controlling concentrated load on the peripheral edge 3ea of the back surface of the face portion on which impact acts greatly when a golf ball is hit, it is desired that the upper face rib 11a and the crown rib 11b are connected with the same width in the toe-heel direction. Similarly, it is desired that the lower face rib 12a and the sole rib 12b are connected with the same width in the toe-heel direction.
In addition, it is desired that the average thickness Tcrt of the crown rib 11b, the average thickness Tsrt of the sole rib 12b, the thickness Tct of the boundary part 3a between the face portion 3 and the crown portion 4, and the thickness Tst of the boundary part 3b of the face portion 3 and the sole portion 4 satisfy the following expressions:
Tcrt, Tsrt>Tct
Tcrt, Tsrt>Tst
The club head 1 provided with the crown-side thick-walled rib 11 and the sole-side thick-walled rib 12 extending from the face portion 3 to the crown portion 4 and the sole portion 5, respectively, increase rigidity of the boundaries 3a and 3b which have relatively low rigidity. Therefore, the head 1 of the embodiment can make the thickness Tct of the boundary part 3a and the thickness Tst of the boundary part 3b smaller than a conventional head 1, thereby improving resilience performance.
More specifically, the thickness Tct of the boundary part 3a is desirably 1.3 mm or less. Similarly, the thickness Tst of the boundary part 3b is desirably 1.5 mm or less. In addition, as durability may deteriorate when both thicknesses Tct and Tst are small, the thickness Tct is desirably 0.8 mm or more and thickness Tst is desirably 1.0 mm or more.
In the embodiment, the crown-side thick-walled rib 11, the sole-side thick-walled rib 12, and the thin-walled part 13 are set as those satisfying the following expressions (6) to (8):
Tc>Tp (6)
Tru, Trd>Tp (7)
Tp>Tcrt, Tsrt (8)
The symbols are as follows:
Tp: Average thickness of the thin-walled part (mm)
In other words, the average thickness Tp of the thin-walled part 13 provided in the face portion 3 is greater than the crown rib 11b provided in the crown portion 4 and the sole rib 12b provided in the sole portion 5. In such a head 1, durability and easiness to swing a club improve because weight is reduced while rigidity of the face portion 3 is ensured.
In addition, the thin-walled part 13 of the embodiment includes a toe-side thin-walled part 14 provided on the toe side of the central thick-walled part 10 and a heel-side thin-walled part 15 provided on the heel side of the central thick-walled part 10. The toe-side thin-walled part 14 includes a toe-side intermediate thin-walled part 14a, a toe-crown-side thin-walled part 14b provided between the toe-side intermediate thin-walled part 14a and the upper face rib 11a, and a toe-sole-side thin-walled part 14c provided between the toe-side intermediate thin-walled part 14a and the lower face rib 12a.
In addition, a heel-side thin-walled part 15 includes a heel-side intermediate thin-walled part 15a provided on the heel side of the central thick-walled part 10, a heel-crown-side thin-walled part 15b provided between the heel-side intermediate thin-walled part 15a and the crown-side thick-walled rib 11, and a heel-sole-side thin-walled part 15c provided between the heel-side intermediate thin-walled part 15a and the sole-side thick-walled rib 12.
when the average thickness Tp of the thin-walled part 13 becomes small, durability of the face portion 2 deteriorates. In contrast, when it increases, deflection of the face portion 3 becomes small, and loss in a flight distance may increase. From such a standpoint, it is desired that the average thickness Tp of the thin-walled part 13 is preferably 1.9 mm or more and more preferably 2.0 mm or more, and preferably 2.6 mm or less and more preferably 2.5 mm or less. In addition, to have the function effect described above work, it is desired that actual thickness Tp1 of the thin-walled part 13 is preferably 2.0 mm or more and preferably 2.4 mm or less, although the actual thickness is not particularly limited.
In addition, the toe-side intermediate thin-walled part 14a of the embodiment is formed to be thinner than the toe-crown-side thin-walled part 14b and the toe-sole-side thin-walled part 14c. Similarly, the heel-side intermediate thin-walled part 15a is formed to be thinner than the heel-crown-side thin-walled part 15b and the heel-sole-side thin-walled part 15c. This reduces weight of the face portion 3. In addition, this causes the thin-walled part 13 of the face portion 3 to sufficiently bend even during a mishit in which a golf ball is hit by the toe side or the heel side of the face portion 2, thus ensuring resilience performance. In addition, the thin-walled part 13 of the present invention is not limited to such an aspect, and may all be of the same thickness.
When thickness Tt of the toe-side intermediate thin-walled part 14a and thickness Th of the heel-side intermediate thin-walled part 15a are too small, durability of the face portion 3 may deteriorate. On the other hand, when respective thicknesses Tt and Th are too great, deflection of the face portion 3 during a mishit is damaged, and thus loss in a flight distance may increase. From such a standpoint, it is desired that the thicknesses Tt and Th of respective intermediate thin-walled parts 14a and 15a are preferably 1.7 mm or more and more preferably 1.9 mm or more, and preferably 2.3 mm or less and more preferably 2.2 mm or less.
In addition, it is desired that a ratio Tc/Tt of the thickness Tc of the central thick-walled part 10 and the thickness Tt of the toe-side intermediate thin-walled part 14a and a ratio Tc/Th of the thickness Tc of the central thick-walled part 10 and the thickness Th of the heel-side intermediate thin-walled part 15a are preferably 1.4 to 2.0. Although a difference in thickness increases and resilience performance becomes high if the ratios become greater, stress may concentrate between the thin-walled part 14a or 15a and the central thick-walled part 10. In contrast, if the ratios become smaller, the resilience performance may degrade.
In addition, as shown in
Each of thickness transition parts 20 to 24 helps in improving durability of the face portion 3 by preventing generation of a great rigidity step resulting from a difference in thickness of each part, and preventing stress concentration.
In
In addition, in
Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the present invention should not be limited to the specific embodiments mentioned above. For example, a club head 1 may be configured by a plate-like face member without an extension, and a head main portion provided with an opening on a front face, to which the face member can be attached (not shown).
Based on the specification of Table 1 and configurations of
Listed below are common specifications:
Head mass: uniformed to 190.5 g (Driver (1#))
Maximum width of a central thick-walled part in a toe-heel direction: 35 mm
Average thickness of a crown-side thick-walled rib: 2.85 mm, actual thickness, 2.75 to 2.95 mm
Average thickness of a sole-side thick-walled rib: 2.9 m mm, actual thickness, 2.8 to 3.0 mm
Width of the crown-side thick-walled rib in the toe-heel direction: 7 to 15 mm
Width of the sole-side thick-walled rib in the toe-heel direction: 7 to 15 mm
Width of an upper side face rib in the toe-heel direction: 10 to 25 mm
Width of a lower side face rib in the toe-heel direction: 10 to 25 mm
Average thickness of the upper face rib: 2.0 mm, actual thickness 1.8 to 2.4 mm
Average thickness of the lower face rib: 2.4 mm, actual thickness of 2.0 to 2.6 mm
Average thickness of a thin-walled part: 2.15 mm
A method for testing is as follows:
<Resilience Performance>
A resilience coefficient was determined, in accordance with Procedure for Measuring the velocity Ratio of a Club Head for Conformance to Rule 4-1e, Revision 2 (Feb. 8, 1999). However, measurement positions are five locations: in addition to a sweet spot, a toe-side position and a heel-side position, respectively spaced 20 mm on a toe side and a heel side from the sweet spot, and a crown-side position and a sole-side position, respectively spaced 10 mm upward and downward from the sweet spot. Values indicated are indices with resilience coefficients of the sweet spot as 100 in each example, and are averages of 4 locations, excluding the sweet spot. The greater a numeric value is, the better the resilience performance is.
<Durability Performance>
45-inch wood-type golf clubs were manufactured experimentally by mounting each test head to a carbon shaft (sv-3003J, flex x) made by SRI Sports Limited. The club was attached to a swing robot made by Miyamae Co., Ltd., and hit golf balls with the sweet spot of the face at a head speed of 54 m/s. Till the head was broken, the number of hits (the upper limit was set to 10,000 hits) was counted. In addition, it was checked whether or not there was damage by stopping hitting every 10 balls, and observing the head with the naked eyes. The greater the number of hits is, the better the durability performance is.
Table 1 shows test result.
As a result of the test, it could be checked that the club of the embodiment had a small reduction rate of resilience performance and was good. In other words, it could be checked that loss in a flight distance could be kept low even if hit ball positions fluctuate. Also, it could be checked that the durability performance was good.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010-260340 | Nov 2010 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4214754 | Zebelean | Jul 1980 | A |
5419559 | Melanson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5482279 | Antonious | Jan 1996 | A |
5547427 | Rigal et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5908356 | Nagamoto | Jun 1999 | A |
6527650 | Reyes et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6595871 | Sano | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6645087 | Yabu | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6852038 | Yabu | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7303488 | Kakiuchi et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7431668 | Tateno et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435191 | Tateno et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442132 | Nishio | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445564 | Kusumoto | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7614964 | Matsunaga | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618331 | Hirano | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7641568 | Hoffman et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7762909 | Sugimoto | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8353784 | Boyd et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20030144079 | Yoneyama | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20080214322 | Chou et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220894 | Matsunaga et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090253533 | Hirano | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-315854 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2006-175135 | Jul 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120129627 A1 | May 2012 | US |