This invention relates to golf club heads for golf clubs such as drivers, irons and putters.
Many proposals have been made to design golf clubs which provide improved control over, and feel for, the golf ball, for example by providing grooves on the impact face of the golf club head. Reference may be made, for example, to U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,383,654, 1,452,695, 1,494,494, 5,176,384, 5,358,249, 5,405,136, 5,542,675, 5,766,093, 5,807,190 and 6,007,435. The disclosure of each of those patents is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Not all of the proposals comply with the USGA Rules of Golf, Rule 4 and Appendix II, which require that, for clubs other than putters, “the whole of the impact area” of the club face “must be of the same material” and that impact area markings, such as grooves, should comply with certain requirements. The “impact area” of a club head is referred to herein as the “impact face”.
In a first preferred aspect, this invention provides golf club head comprising
In a second preferred aspect, this invention provides a method of making a golf club head, for example a golf club head according to the first preferred. aspect of the invention, the method comprising
The composition, dimensions and arrangement of the bars are preferably chosen so that the impact face has a desired response when a golf ball impacts it at different positions across the insert. In some embodiments, the sidewalls of the bars are pre-shaped so that adjacent sidewalls provide grooves of desired dimensions on the impact face. For example, half grooves are machined onto the appropriate sidewalls so that, when the bars are incorporated into the faceplate, the adjacent half grooves form grooves on the impact face. This allows individual bars to be economically mass produced before being incorporated into an inset in the face of a club head. In some embodiments, the bars are retained in the recess by a dovetail geometry on the ends of the bars. In a preferred embodiment, a top and/or bottom retainer element is pressed into place in the dovetail in order to lock the bars into position.
Preferred club heads of the invention can provide important advantages by comparison with conventional golf clubs in which the impact face is provided by a single piece of material (and, therefore, has a “trampoline” geometry with a centroidal sweet spot outside of which performance drops off quickly). Such advantages can include:
Preferred club heads of the invention, particularly club heads for irons and drivers, conform with the USGA Rules of Golf with respect to grooves on, and uniformity of material of, the impact face.
Preferred embodiments of the method of the invention provide an improved method of manufacturing a club head having grooves in its impact face.
Referring for example to
The side edges 6 of the bars' frontwalls 13 may be machined before assembly such that a groove 10,26 is formed between adjacent bars and/or between the bars and any retainers 7, 9, 27,29,34,35,44,47. A bar 37,48 side edge may be machined to provide a full length groove between adjacent bars. Alternatively, the bars 38,49 may be machined to provide a less than full length groove between adjacent bars. The bars may also be machined to form grooves in the frontwalls between the edges. The groves may be any shape (e.g., V shaped, square, or round); although, the V shaped grooves formed by two adjacent beveled edges are preferred. This allows for the economical production of precision machined grooves on a golf club face.
The bars may be retained in position in a club head by an interlocking arrangement, by bonding such as metallurgical or adhesive bonding or a combination thereof. For example, the bars may be retained in the club face by mating edges 5 forming a dovetail or other suitable geometry cast or machined into the recess 2 in the club head, e.g., spaced apart vertically or horizontally extending mating surfaces at opposed edges of the recess. In a preferred embodiment, the assembly of a “bars” iron is as illustrated in
As illustrated in
A further feature of the “bars” approach to providing an insert for a golf club having an impact face is that the bars can be of any desirable material. For example, in putters it is desirable to achieve a soft feel so a polymeric material with a low modulus of elasticity may be selected for the bars. In an iron type club a highly elastic material with a non-linear modulus like NiTi may be selected for its ability to absorb and recover from high energy impacts. In a wood type club, materials of the highest hardness may be used to maximize flight distance.
The mechanical properties of the impact face may be influenced by varying the length, width, and arrangement of the bars. The bars may be rectilinear (i.e. straight) as in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The invention can be implemented in variations of the foregoing embodiments. For example, the length and direction of the bars could be varied as well within a single club face and/or a configuration of variously treated short bars could be bonded to backing bars and/or provided with mating surfaces in adjacent endwalls. Further, bars of uniform but differently processed (e.g. heat treated) material may used to provide a more even impact response across an impact face and/or smaller bars might be used to heighten this effect, e.g., short bars may be machined to provide mating surfaces at the end walls. Alternatively, short bars may have flat end walls and rely solely on adhesion to a backing bar for retention in the club head. The directions of bars may change one or more times across the impact face. In arrangements of this type, the adjacent endwalls and sidewalls of orthogonal bars may be shaped to provide mating surfaces to retain bars not in contact with the edges of the recess. Bars of mixed shape and orientation may be combined in various arrangements to provide desired properties such as differing groove and surface deflection directions as a function of the impact position on the impact face. Multiple layers of individual bars may be inserted in a club head recess, e.g., an outer layer of bars may be retained in the recess over a backing plate comprising an inner layer of backing bars to provide a fine tuned surface response. The exposed layer may be of a thin, uniform, and elastic material such as NiTi. Backing layers may be of any hardness, cross-section, and arrangement. In a preferred embodiment, the surface bars mate with edges of the recess for purposes of retention.
An advantage of preferred embodiments of the invention is the ability to provide a more uniform response to off-center hits. This can be accomplished with the “bars” approach by varying the thickness of the material of the bars over the impact face. Also, the mechanical properties may vary at different points in the impact face while presenting a uniform material surface. For example, bars heat-treated or otherwise processed in different ways either uniformly lengthwise or variably along a bar's length would allow the impact face to be fine tuned for its response characteristics. Multi-layer bars may incorporate several laminations of different materials specifically chosen for vibration dampening properties or elastic response or both. The various configurations of shape, orientation, and thickness of can be used to offset inherent imbalance and inertia effects in a club when hit off-center or to help compensate an inherently faulty swing. The back-face of the bars may comprise structural features such as a bump or island for the purpose of limiting the travel of a deflected bar upon impact with a ball.
Any of the previous examples might be used in conjunction. For example, alternating layers of vertical and horizontal bars might be used to fine tune the response of the impact face. Likewise, any other combination of the exemplary designs might be implemented varying the thickness, width, length, material, properties, and direction.
In addition to the forgoing description, the invention and preferred embodiments thereof may be further understood by consideration of the following examples.
Iron with enhanced off-center impact response.
Any of the long (i.e., irons numbered 1 to 5) type clubs may be enhanced for distance with consistency of control by providing an impact face with a larger area of uniform impact response. To this end, a club head body is provided with a recess in the form of a vertical dovetail slot in the face. A polished steel retainer, flat on top with the top front edge machined at a 45 degree angle to a depth of 0.02 inches, contoured on the bottom to match the bottom and sole of the club face, and machined into a dovetail wedge at each end, is press fit into the bottom of the dovetail slot. A series of 10 NiTi bars, about 0.13 inches wide, machined to a 10 degree angle at each end (with a 0.015 inch 45 degree chamfer at the wedge tip) are sized to fit snugly in the dovetail slot. The bars are about 0.1 inches deep at the ends of the frontwall. The side-edges of the front wall are machined at a 45 degree angle to a depth of 0.02 inches. The back side of each bar is machined in a parabolic contour lengthwise with the center of the 6th bar machined to approximately half its depth; upper bars are machined more deeply than lower bars in sequence stepwise such that a rear view of the bars stacked in order shows a smooth parabolic contour along the heel to toe direction of the bars and a step-wise linear progression from top to bottom of the stack. The bars are stacked tightly together in the slot forming a precision V shaped groove at each adjacent edge. A top retainer of polished steel, flat on the bottom with the bottom front edge machined at a 45 degree angle to a depth of 0.02 inches, contoured on the top to match the top of the club face, and machined into a wedge at each end to fit tightly in the dovetail slot, is press fit into the top of the dovetail slot. In an on-center impact, the shaped impact deflection focuses energy otherwise dispersed across the face to a center line of thrust. In the case of a slightly off-center impact the shaped deflection of the face re-focuses the flight of ball in the intended direction with minimal loss of distance. The top to bottom thickness progression smooths and expands the sweet spot vertically for high and low impacts. Balls struck at the bottom of the impact face are increasingly directed upward to the desired loft and balls struck near the top of the impact face have a softer feel and longer contact time with the impact face.
Irons with enhanced spin and directional control.
An iron type club is provided with an insert of pointing “V” shaped bars as illustrated in
The various illustrations demonstrate the potential to change properties across the club face while still conforming, if desired, with the one material constraint of the USGA rules. Numerous alternative arrangements, bar treatments, shapes, materials, and retaining arrangements may be imagined.
The foregoing has described the principles, preferred embodiments and mode of operation of the present invention. However, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular embodiments discussed. Thus the above-described embodiments should be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive, and it should be appreciated that variations may be made in those embodiments by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 11/261,915, filed Oct. 31, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,364,513. Application Ser. No. 11/261,915 is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/616,984, filed on Jul. 11, 2003, now abandoned. The entire disclosure of that patent and each of those applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
456258 | Hutton | Jul 1891 | A |
732136 | Taylor | Jun 1903 | A |
890836 | Beale | Jun 1908 | A |
974888 | Jacobus | Nov 1910 | A |
1094599 | Samson | Apr 1914 | A |
1289553 | Sanders | Dec 1918 | A |
1337958 | Reach | Apr 1920 | A |
D57980 | Kraeuter | May 1921 | S |
1383654 | Mattern | Jul 1921 | A |
1452695 | Mattern | Apr 1923 | A |
D63284 | Challis | Nov 1923 | S |
1485685 | Alexander | Mar 1924 | A |
1494494 | Lippincott | May 1924 | A |
1524731 | Brown | Feb 1925 | A |
1526951 | Barry | Feb 1925 | A |
1532545 | Patterson | Apr 1925 | A |
1535670 | Kidd | Apr 1925 | A |
1562956 | Guerne | Nov 1925 | A |
1595589 | Tyler | Aug 1926 | A |
1618900 | Wolkerstorfer | Feb 1927 | A |
1646461 | Sorelle | Oct 1927 | A |
1654257 | Hillerich | Dec 1927 | A |
1659272 | Link | Feb 1928 | A |
D79684 | Munro-Spencer | Oct 1929 | S |
1968626 | Young | Jul 1934 | A |
D138380 | Myers | Jul 1944 | S |
2429351 | Fetterrolf | Oct 1947 | A |
2586084 | Roe | Feb 1952 | A |
3211455 | Hyden | Oct 1965 | A |
3455558 | Onions | Jul 1969 | A |
3847399 | Raymont | Nov 1974 | A |
3869126 | Thompson | Mar 1975 | A |
4027885 | Rogers | Jun 1977 | A |
4156526 | Huggens | May 1979 | A |
4252262 | Igarashi | Feb 1981 | A |
4413825 | Sasse | Nov 1983 | A |
4422638 | Tucker | Dec 1983 | A |
4508349 | Gebauer | Apr 1985 | A |
4529203 | Ribaudo | Jul 1985 | A |
4630826 | Nishigaki | Dec 1986 | A |
4679792 | Straza | Jul 1987 | A |
4681322 | Straza | Jul 1987 | A |
4740345 | Nagasaki | Apr 1988 | A |
4768787 | Shira | Sep 1988 | A |
4884808 | Retzer | Dec 1989 | A |
4919177 | Homma | Apr 1990 | A |
4964641 | Miesch | Oct 1990 | A |
4999000 | Finney | Mar 1991 | A |
5024437 | Anderson | Jun 1991 | A |
5083778 | Douglass | Jan 1992 | A |
5176384 | Sata | Jan 1993 | A |
D340492 | Flood | Oct 1993 | S |
5301941 | Allen | Apr 1994 | A |
5316304 | Yost | May 1994 | A |
5358249 | Mendralla | Oct 1994 | A |
5403007 | Chen | Apr 1995 | A |
5405136 | Hardman | Apr 1995 | A |
5407196 | Busnardo | Apr 1995 | A |
5408554 | Cryan | Apr 1995 | A |
5445386 | Marshall | Aug 1995 | A |
5447311 | Viollaz | Sep 1995 | A |
5458332 | Fisher | Oct 1995 | A |
5482282 | Willis | Jan 1996 | A |
5489094 | Pritchett | Feb 1996 | A |
D368126 | Magerman | Mar 1996 | S |
5505450 | Stuff | Apr 1996 | A |
5524331 | Pond | Jun 1996 | A |
5531439 | Azzarella | Jul 1996 | A |
5542675 | Micciche | Aug 1996 | A |
5573469 | Dekura | Nov 1996 | A |
5575472 | Magerman | Nov 1996 | A |
5620381 | Spalding | Apr 1997 | A |
5620382 | Cho | Apr 1997 | A |
5674132 | Fisher | Oct 1997 | A |
5688186 | Michaels | Nov 1997 | A |
5688190 | Rowland | Nov 1997 | A |
5690562 | Sturm | Nov 1997 | A |
5704850 | Shieh | Jan 1998 | A |
5709616 | Rife | Jan 1998 | A |
5716290 | Baker | Feb 1998 | A |
5738925 | Chaput | Apr 1998 | A |
5766093 | Rohrer | Jun 1998 | A |
5772529 | Ruth | Jun 1998 | A |
5785610 | Birmingham | Jul 1998 | A |
5807190 | Krumme | Sep 1998 | A |
5879243 | Hackman | Mar 1999 | A |
D411275 | Bottema | Jun 1999 | S |
5921871 | Fisher | Jul 1999 | A |
5924939 | Grace | Jul 1999 | A |
D415809 | Bottema | Oct 1999 | S |
6007435 | Chern | Dec 1999 | A |
6089993 | Woodward | Jul 2000 | A |
6193615 | Hirota | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6267691 | Dammen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6554721 | Woodward | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6849004 | Lindsay | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7364513 | Krumme | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20030027659 | Brown | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050009623 | Dickinson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050054461 | Pakamseree | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075193 | Otoguro | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050130764 | Frame | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050255930 | Johnson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060154746 | Hagood | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060191403 | Hawkins | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0710493 | May 1996 | EP |
218-5891 | Aug 1987 | GB |
3-23877 | Jan 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080214320 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11261915 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 12079744 | US | |
Parent | 10616984 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11261915 | US |