The present disclosure relates generally to golf clubs and, more particularly, to a golf club head having an improved face plate support and performance enhancing center of gravity location.
Many factors must be considered when designing a golf club head. One factor is the distribution of mass about the club head, which is typically quantified by parameters such as moments of inertia (MOI) magnitude and center of gravity (CG) location. Rotational moments of inertia of a club head about the club head CG are measures of a club head's resistance to rotation about the CG and are related to the distribution of mass within the club head about the CG. Generally, it is desirable for a club head to have high moments of inertia about the CG, particularly to promote forgiveness for off-center hits. To achieve high moments of inertia about the CG, designers typically position mass to the periphery of the golf club head and backwards from the face plate. In addition, a club head's CG is spaced from the face plate at a prescribed location to achieve a desired launch angle upon impact with a golf ball. As a result, for wood-type club heads (i.e., fairway woods and drivers), large internal volumes are typically desirable.
In order to maximize the MOI about the CG and provide the face plate with a desirable high coefficient of restitution (COR), it typically is desirable to incorporate thin walls and a light face plate into the design of the club head. Thin walls afford designers additional leeway in distributing mass to more strategic locations within the club head. In addition, the use of a lighter composite face plate in place of a more traditional metal face plate creates additional mass savings that can be distributed advantageously elsewhere. Composite face plates however create design and manufacturing issues because they typically are much thicker than the metal club head, making it difficult to provide a smooth transition at the interface between the head's thin supporting wall and thicker composite face plate, especially in the crown area. In making this transition, the thin supporting wall typically undergoes a reverse angle due to the geometry at the interface, complicating the casting process when the club head body is manufactured.
Also, one significant drawback of the industry's conventional approach of trying to maximize MOI about the CG to promote forgiveness and greater ball speed during off-center ball strikes is that the ball tends to have undesirably high backspin as the ball leaves the club face (especially in the context of a driver). This means that the ball will balloon and lose distance.
It should therefore be appreciated that there exists a need for a golf club head having a composite face plate (or face insert) and other design features that facilitate better performance and durability, impart less backspin to the ball, provide a smooth transition between the main body and face plate, free up discretionary mass to be strategically distributed elsewhere, and improve the manufacturing process.
In one embodiment, the present disclosure describes a golf club head comprising a body having a crown, a sole and skirt disposed between the crown and sole. It further includes a composite face plate having a crown end, sole end and skirt ends therebetween, the crown, sole and skirt defining an opening to receive the face plate. The club has a CGz/CGy ratio less than −0.2 and a club volume of at least 425 cm3.
In other examples, the club head may have a club head volume of at least about 460 cm3, a club head volume of about 425 to 470 cm3, a maximum height of at least 50 mm, a height of about 50 mm to 60 mm, a loft angle less than about 15 degrees, a CGz/CGy ratio of about −0.2 to −0.41, a CGz/CGy ratio less than about −0.23, a CGz/CGy ratio less than −0.25, a CGz/CGy ratio less than −0.35 and/or a leading crown edge that is set back at least about 14 mm to 19 mm from a leading edge of the sole.
In another embodiment, the present disclosure describes a golf club head comprising a body having a crown, a sole and skirt disposed between the crown and sole. It further includes a composite face plate having a crown end, sole end and skirt ends therebetween, the crown, sole and skirt defining an opening to receive the face place. The channel may have a channel depth of about 8.8 mm to 4.1 mm, channel height of about 3.9 mm to 4.1 mm, and at least three separate substantially flat surfaces for engaging the face plate.
In another embodiment, a golf club head includes a body having a crown, a sole, a skirt disposed between the crown and sole, and a shaft-receiving hosel. The hosel has a bore defining a hosel axis. The club head also includes a composite face plate having an outer wall, the crown, sole and skirt defining an opening for mounting the face plate. The head also includes a weight plug mounted within a weight port located in the sole. The weight plug may have a length of about 40 mm to 60 mm, a width of about 14 mm to 18 mm, and a geometric center located about 14 to 20 mm from a leading edge of the sole.
In one aspect, the plug may have a mass of about 50 to 75 grams. The plug may have a rectangular shape and be made from a tungsten alloy. In other embodiments, the plug may have alternative geometric (e.g., round, triangular, square, trapezoidal, etc.) or irregular shapes. The club head may have any of the foregoing features, including a CGz/CGy ratio less than about −0.2 and a volume of at least 360 cm3, as well as a hosel that terminates at one end in a substantially flush relationship with the crown.
In yet another aspect, the club head may have a plurality of thin wall zones formed in a portion of the crown and/or skirt which are separated by a web of thicker wall portions therebetween. In one aspect, the thin wall zones may have a thickness of about 0.4 mm and the web of thicker walls may have a thickness of about 0.6 mm.
In yet another example, a golf club head includes a body having a crown, a sole, a skirt therebetween and a hosel having a shaft receiving bore. It further includes a composite face plate that is supportively received within an opening defined by the crown, sole and skirt. The composite face plate can have an outer wall with a transition radius of curvature along one edge at an interface juncture with at least one of the sole, crown and skirt. At least one of the crown and skirt may have a plurality of thin wall zones defined by pockets in an inner surface of the crown and/or skirt. A weight port may be formed in the sole, and a weight plug mounted within the weight port, wherein the weight plug includes at least some redistributed mass saved by the transition radius of the face plate and thin wall zones. The club head may have any of the foregoing features including a CGz/CGy ratio less than about −0.2, a CGz/CGy ratio of about −0.2 to −0.41, volume of about 425 to 470 cm3, weight plug mass of about 50 to 75 grams, and/or CGz of at least −6 mm.
In another aspect, the face plate has an outer wall with a surface area of 4200 to 5000 mm2.
In still another aspect, a CGz value is defined as the distance the CG of the club head is located above or below a horizontal plane (i.e., a plane parallel to a ground plane) that passes through the center of the face of the club head, with positive CGz values representing a CG located above the horizontal plane, and negative CGz values representing a CG located below the horizontal plane. In several examples, the CGz of the club head is less than −6 mm, such as less than −8 mm, such as less than −10 mm.
In yet another aspect, a CGy value is defined as the distance the CG of the club head is located to the rear of a vertical plane (i.e., a plane perpendicular to a ground plane) that is tangent to the center of the face of the club head. In several examples, the CGy of the club head is no more than 29 mm, such as no more than 26 mm, such as no more than 24 mm.
These embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention(s) herein disclosed, but not intended to provide an exhaustive list of all of the novel embodiments, aspects and features disclosed therein. These and other embodiments disclosed herein will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having relevance to the attached figures, the invention(s) not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment disclosed.
The disclosed technology is illustrated by way of example and not limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale or intended to illustrate the correct size proportions between components.
Various embodiments and aspects of the disclosed technology will be described with reference to details discussed below, and the accompanying drawings will illustrate various embodiments. The following description and drawings are illustrative of the technology and are not to be construed as limiting the disclosure in any way. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough conceptual understanding of various embodiments of the disclosed technology. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to provide a concise discussion of various embodiments.
With reference to
The club head body 10, which is largely hollow, typically defines a volume of about 130 cubic centimeters (cc or cm3) to about the current USGA limit of 460 cc. In some embodiments described herein, the club head volume is from about 360 cc to about 460 cc, such as from about 425 cc to about 460 cc. In other embodiments, the club head volume may be greater than 460 cc. The body may have attached or incorporated therein weight ports, ribs, performance adjustment components and other features, such as a recess 22 for receiving a weight plug. The body 10 preferably has a thin-wall construction formed by casting or otherwise from suitable metal or non-metal materials, such as squeeze-cast magnesium alloys, steel, combination of magnesium and titanium alloys, and preferably cast titanium alloys known for their high strength and light weight properties. A multi-piece body made from one or more different materials may be used with, for example, the sole, skirt and part of the crown formed by known metal casting methods and the remaining crown portion formed from stamped metal or composite material. In some embodiments, including the one described herein, the head body 10 is a single integrated piece formed from a cast titanium alloy.
The club head body may be formed by investment casting a titanium alloy such as Ti-6Al-4V. Alternatively, a soluble wax may be used to create the club head body.
In one embodiment, the weight port 22 may be sized to receive a round shape-compatible weight (not shown) having a diameter of about 25 to 35 mm (preferably about 30 mm), and a height or depth of about 3 to 4.5 mm (preferably about 3.75 mm).
It will be appreciated that the thin wall zones or pockets 25 may have a wall thickness of about 0.4 mm, as compared to a wall thickness of about 0.6 mm for the wall-reinforcing, web-like wall portions therebetween. The zones 25 may have a variety of individual shapes and be arranged in group patterns other than the elliptical shape and pattern shown in
As used herein, “normal address position” means the club head position wherein a vector normal to the center of the club face lies in a first vertical plane (a vertical plane perpendicular to the ground plane), a centerline axis of the club shaft (or hosel) lies in a second vertical plane, and the first vertical plane and second vertical plane perpendicularly intersect.
In one example, the edge 30a (
As can be seen in
The composite face plate 26 may be attached to the metallic club head body 10 using adhesives or other conventional techniques. In order to prevent peel and delamination failure at the face body junction, the composite face plate should be slightly recessed from or substantially flush with the plane of the forward surface of the metal body at the junction.
Referring to
In
The face plate 26 forms part of the head's club face which also includes a portion of the head body near the hosel.
The disclosed technology is well-suited for use with a composite face plate 26. The face plate may be formed from plies (layers) of composite material (prepeg) and can be defined according to the combination of fiber, resin system, fiber area weight (FAW) and resin content (R/C) use. One example of a preferred prepeg is 70 g FAW 34/700 material which comprises 34/700 fiber, Newport 301 resin, 70 g/m2 FAW and 40% R/C. Various embodiments of suitable composite face plates, and methods of manufacture, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,267,620, titled GOLF CLUB HEAD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reissue Pat. No. RE42,544, titled GOLF CLUB HEAD, also is herein incorporated by reference.
The composite face plate 26 can be manufactured by stacking and cutting the plies in predetermined orientations. This may be done in smaller groups of plies that are eventually stacked to form a final thickness of the face plate. More particularly, the plies of prepeg can be arranged in specific groups in which each ply has a predetermined orientation with reference to a horizontal axis. For example, a first or outermost ply may comprise 1080 glass fabric oriented at 0 degrees, followed by 48 plies of 34/700 prepeg oriented sets of 12 plies or at 0, +45, 90 and −45 degrees. Another ply of 34/700 at 90 degrees proceeds the final or innermost ply of 1080 glass fabric oriented at 0 degrees.
The face plate preferably achieves the final desired shape or dimensions by die cutting. The final desired bulge and roll of the face plate may be achieved during the last two or more “debulking” or compaction steps to reduce air trapped between plies. Preferably a third debulking step includes forming a panel having the final desired bulge and roll and more preferably an additional fourth debulking step is provided to form the panel to a final face thickness.
While the embodiments described herein are ideally suited for heads having a composite face plate, the face plate may be made from a metal alloy (e.g., an alloy of titanium, steel, aluminum and/or magnesium), ceramic material, or a combination of composite, metal alloy, and/or ceramic materials.
Referring to
In one embodiment, the support frame 24c for supporting the crown edge of the face plate preferably has a pocket height Ph of about 3.5 mm to 4.5 mm, a pocket depth Pd of about 3.5 mm to 4.5 mm and a pocket set back PS of about 2.0 mm to 3.0 mm, as illustrated in
With reference to
Referring to
A center face CF is defined as the intersection of the midpoints of face height and face width of the striking surface. Both face height and face width are determined using the striking face curve which is bounded on its periphery by all points where the face transitions from a substantially uniform bulge and roll radii. The face height is the distance from the periphery proximate to the sole portion of the striking face to the periphery proximate the crown portion measured in a vertical plane normal to the x-axis that runs through the origin. The face width is the distance from the periphery proximate the heel portion of the striking face to the periphery proximate the toe portion measured in a horizontal plane normal to the z-axis that runs through the origin. For purposes of this description, the center face is also referred to as the “geometric center” of the golf club striking surface. See also U.S.G.A. “Procedure for Measuring the Flexibility of a Golf Clubhead,” Revision 2.0 for the methodology to measure the geometric center of the striking face.
In the example shown in
The support frames 124a, 124b, 124c support a face plate 126 as previously described. In the
In one embodiment, the plug 140 is made from a tungsten alloy, has a generally rectangular shape and has a mass of about 50 to 75 g. Alternative shapes, profiles and mass may be used as well (see
The weight plug 140 (as well as the round weight plug compatible with weight port 22) may be affixed to the club head by glue or other adhesives, brazing, welding, screw fasteners, co-casting or integrally casting, or other commonly known joining techniques.
Referring to
In the embodiment shown in
This CG location relatively close to the face, and relatively close to an optimum center face ball impact location on the face, results in the club head delivering higher energy transfer to the ball and imparting higher ball speed off the club face. This translates to the ball travelling a greater distance. Additionally, with the CG located lower (closer to the sole), as
The term “volume” (typically measured in cm3) as used herein is equal to the volumetric displacement of the club head, assuming any apertures are sealed by a planar surface, using the method prescribed by the United States Golf Association and the R&R Rules Limited.
Expanding the foregoing explanation, current club designers apply conventional wisdom to pursue a higher moment of inertia in order to achieve more forgiveness on off center hits. Higher moment of inertia gives greater resistance to rotation on off center hits which results in less ball speed loss. For drivers, the ball also starts off line with sidespin due to heel-toe off center hits. The face bulge radius (radius from heel-to-toe) is typically designed to counteract the deviation angle and sidespin due to off center hits, and helps the ball curve back to the center. Thus, with a properly designed bulge radius, the benefit of higher moment of inertia is more to reduce ball speed loss than to increase directional accuracy on off center hits. The off center ball speed loss is not as severe for most modern clubs because they utilize variable thickness face designs which are thicker near the center region and thinner towards the edge.
However, one disadvantage of higher moment of inertia clubs is that the CG typically moves back and higher since the mass needs to be moved to the periphery in order to maximize this property. The disadvantage of moving the mass back and higher is that the spin increases significantly which can reduce overall distance. When looking at the pros and cons of higher moments of inertia with a higher/back center of gravity versus a slightly lower moment of inertia with a lower, more forward center of gravity, it surprisingly turns out that there is a distance advantage to seeking a lower CG than known clubs, in combination with the CG being more forward, even if the moment of inertia is reduced slightly. This can be defined by the ratio of CGz/CGy. When CGz is a more negative number this means the center of gravity is more below center face. When CGy is a smaller positive number, this means the CG is less far back (front-to-back) from the center face. When the ratio of CGz/CGy becomes more negative, then this indicates that the trajectory will be hotter and deliver more distance.
It has been found that launch conditions for maximum driver distance typically occur at about a 14-16 degree launch angle and about 1800-2200 rpm spin. For most golfers, with prior driver CG's this is very difficult to attain. When driver loft is increased enough to achieve a 14-16 degree launch angle, the spin is usually much higher than 1800-2200 rpm, which means the ball will balloon and lose distance. Applicants have found that it is desirable to have a CG that is much lower and more forward than prior club heads in order for more golfers to achieve these more optimal launch conditions.
As shown in the table below, a preferred embodiment has a CGz/CGy ratio of −0.21, and an alternative embodiment has a CGz/CGy ratio of −0.41.
In still further embodiments, improved performance and a desirable balance of reduced MOI with a relatively low and forward CG location is achieved by providing CGz/CGy ratios of −0.25, −0.30, −0.35, −0.40, −0.45, and −0.50, and the corresponding higher or lower moments of inertia that correspond with these ratios. Such drivers would preferably have a loft angle of less than 15 degrees, a volume between 425 cc to 470 cc, and a head height of at least 50 mm (as measured from a ground plane to the highest point on the crown when the head is in the address position). If the loft is greater than 15 degrees, the ball may launch too high, and if the volume is less than 425 cc or the head height is too shallow, the driver may be too difficult for many golfers to hit consistently.
In one embodiment, a driver having a CGz/CGy ratio of at least −0.20 has a head height of at least 50 mm and/or a volume of at least 425 cc, preferably about 425 to 460 cc. In another embodiment, a driver has a CGz/CGy ratio of at least about −0.25, or at least about −0.30).
Unless otherwise indicated, the exemplary parameters mentioned herein are for a driver-type club. It will be appreciated that application of the principles herein to smaller metal-woods will necessitate some adjustment of at least some of the disclosed parameters. For example, a 3-wood necessarily will have a smaller volume and total mass than a driver, 5-wood will have a smaller volume and total mass than a 3-wood and so on.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention(s) may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention(s) and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the disclosure. Rather, the scope of the disclosure is at least as broad as the following claims. We therefore claim all that comes within the scope of these claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/789,441, filed Mar. 7, 2013, which incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1133129 | Govan | Mar 1915 | A |
3567228 | Lynn | Mar 1971 | A |
3695618 | Woolley et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
4804188 | McKee et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4884812 | Nagasaki et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5106094 | Desbiolles et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5261664 | Anderson | Nov 1993 | A |
5344140 | Anderson | Sep 1994 | A |
5346216 | Aizawa | Sep 1994 | A |
5425535 | Gee | Jun 1995 | A |
5433440 | Lin | Jul 1995 | A |
5480153 | Igarashi | Jan 1996 | A |
5494281 | Chen | Feb 1996 | A |
5505453 | Mack | Apr 1996 | A |
5518242 | Mahaffey et al. | May 1996 | A |
5720673 | Anderson | Feb 1998 | A |
5735754 | Antonious | Apr 1998 | A |
5774970 | Huang | Jul 1998 | A |
5776011 | Su et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
RE35955 | Lu | Nov 1998 | E |
5830084 | Kosmatka | Nov 1998 | A |
5851160 | Rugge | Dec 1998 | A |
5863261 | Eggiman | Jan 1999 | A |
5906550 | Kingston | May 1999 | A |
5916038 | Uchiyama et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5935019 | Yamamoto | Aug 1999 | A |
5935020 | Stites | Aug 1999 | A |
5993329 | Shieh | Nov 1999 | A |
5993331 | Shieh | Nov 1999 | A |
6050904 | Kuo | Apr 2000 | A |
6146287 | Rugge et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162133 | Peterson | Dec 2000 | A |
6193614 | Sasamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6248025 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254494 | Hasebe | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6364789 | Kosmatka | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390932 | Kosmatka et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6440011 | Hocknell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6582323 | Soracco et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6607451 | Kosmatka et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6648774 | Lee | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6669576 | Rice | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669577 | Hocknell | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6773360 | Willett | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6945877 | Kobayashi | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7004852 | Billings | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7140974 | Chao et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7267620 | Chao et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7357730 | Shieh | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7448964 | Schweigert et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7559854 | Harvell et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7585233 | Horacek et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7628712 | Chao et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682264 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7731603 | Beach | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771291 | Willett | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7850546 | Chao et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7871340 | Chao | Jan 2011 | B2 |
RE42544 | Chao et al. | Jul 2011 | E |
8096897 | Beach et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8162775 | Tavares | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8202175 | Ban | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221261 | Curtis et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235841 | Stites et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8235844 | Albertsen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8241142 | Evans | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8430763 | Beach et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444504 | Chao et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8540590 | Tsukada et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8579728 | Morales | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8636610 | Golden | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8870679 | Oldknow | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8876629 | Deshmukh | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8900069 | Beach | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9707457 | Mata | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9750991 | Chao et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010055995 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020065146 | Kusumoto | May 2002 | A1 |
20030036442 | Chao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030139227 | Sugimoto | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050026718 | Chen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059508 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070155539 | Schweigert et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090239680 | Horacek et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110275451 | Chao et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110294599 | Albertsen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120142447 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120196701 | Stites | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120289361 | Beach | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289363 | Myrhum et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130324308 | Boyd et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140080624 | Galvan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140106903 | Nakamura | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140256464 | Chao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 338 903 | Jan 2000 | GB |
H05-068564 | Sep 1993 | JP |
10-155943 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2000-116823 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-167089 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002-186691 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-186692 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-315854 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-518993 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-126309 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-312942 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006-136455 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-320493 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2005-287952 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009-166 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2012-501745 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2010-142448 | Jun 2012 | JP |
2012-50807 | Jul 2012 | JP |
Entry |
---|
“Callaway Lady Fusion FT-iQ Driver (460 cc)—Ladies Drivers—Ladies,” downloaded from http://golfio.com/index.php/ladies-equipment/drivers/callaway-lady-fusion-ft-iq-driver-460cc-88876.html, 2 pp. (document not dated, downloaded on Jun. 6, 2013). |
Office Action (with English translation) for related Japanese Application No. 2017-081876, dated Feb. 9, 2018, 10 pages. |
Final Office action (with English translation) for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-081876 dated Dec. 17, 2018, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170326419 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13789441 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15666295 | US |