Golf club head

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6364789
  • Patent Number
    6,364,789
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 30, 1999
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A golf club having a club head with a striking plate and an annular deflection enhancement member isolating the striking plate from the body of the golf club head. The annular deflection enhancement member is composed of a material having a Young's Modulus lower than that of the material of the striking plate. Thus, the striking plate may be composed of steel while the annular deflection enhancement member is composed of titanium.
Description




CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS




Not Applicable




STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT




Not Applicable




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to a golf club head. More specifically, the present invention relates to a golf club head having a body with an annular deflection enhancement member for attachment of a striking plate thereto.




2. Description of the Related Art




When a golf club head strikes a golf ball, large impacts are produced that load the club head face and the golf ball. Most of the energy is transferred from the head to the golf ball, however, some energy is lost as a result of the collision. The golf ball is typically composed of polymer cover materials (such as ionomers) surrounding a rubber-like core. These softer polymer materials having damping (loss) properties that are strain and strain rate dependent which are on the order of 10-100 times larger than the damping properties of a metallic club face. Thus, during impact most of the energy is lost as a result of the high stresses and deformations of the golf ball (0.001 to 0.20 inches), as opposed to the small deformations of the metallic club face (0.025 to 0.050 inches). A more efficient energy transfer from the club head to the golf ball could lead to greater flight distances of the golf ball.




The generally accepted approach has been to increase the stiffness of the club head face to reduce metal or club head deformations. However, this leads to greater deformations in the golf ball, and thus increases in the energy transfer problem.




Some have recognized the problem and disclosed possible solutions. An example is Campau, U.S. Pat. No. 4,398,965, for a Method Of Making Iron Golf Clubs With Flexible Impact Surface, which discloses a club having a flexible and resilient face plate with a slot to allow for the flexing of the face plate. The face plate of Campau is composed of a ferrous material, such as stainless steel, and has a thickness in the range of 0.1 inches to 0.125 inches.




Another example is Eggiman, U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,261, for a Golf Club Head With Elastically Deforming Face And Back Plates, which discloses the use of a plurality of plates that act in concert to create a spring-like effect on a golf ball during impact. A fluid is disposed between at least two of the plates to act as a viscous coupler.




Yet another example is Jepson et al, U.S. Pat. No. 3,937,474, for a golf Club With A Polyurethane Insert. Jepson discloses that the polyurethane insert has a hardness between 40 and 75 shore D.




Still another example is Inamori, U.S. Pat. No. 3,975,023, for a Golf Club Head With Ceramic Face Plate, which discloses using a face plate composed of a ceramic material having a high energy transfer coefficient, although ceramics are usually harder materials. Chen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,813 for a Golf Club Head, discloses using multiple layers in the face to absorb the shock of the golf ball. One of the materials is a non-metal material.




Lu, U.S. Pat. No. 5,499,814, for a Hollow Club Head With Deflecting Insert Face Plate, discloses a reinforcing element composed of a plastic or aluminum alloy that allows for minor deflecting of the face plate which has a thickness ranging from 0.01 to 0.30 inches for a variety of materials including stainless steel, titanium, KEVLAR®, and the like. Yet another Campau invention, U.S. Pat. No. 3,989,248, for a Golf Club Having Insert Capable Of Elastic Flexing, discloses a wood club composed of wood with a metal insert.




Although the prior art has disclosed many variations of golf club heads, the prior art has failed to provide a golf club head that increases the energy transfer from the golf club striking plate to the golf ball through increased deflection of a conventional striking plate.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a golf club head that is capable of imparting increased deflection of a striking plate composed of a rigid material during impact with a golf ball. The present invention is able to accomplish this by using an annular deflection enhancement member to isolate the striking plate from the body of the golf club head.




One aspect of the present invention is a golf club head including a body, a striking plate and an annular deflection enhancement member. The body has a hollow interior and a face opening thereto. The striking plate has an exterior surface and an interior surface. The annular deflection enhancement member is disposed between the body and the striking plate and isolates the striking plate from the body. The striking plate is composed of a first material and the annular deflection enhancement member is composed of a second material. The first material has a Young's Modulus greater than that of the second material. Preferably, the Young's Modulus of the second material is at least twenty-five percent lower than that of the first material. More preferably, the Young's Modulus of the second material is at least fifty percent lower than that of the first material.




The striking plate may be composed of stainless steel and the second material may be titanium, titanium alloys, copper, aluminum, brass, magnesium, ceramics, composites or polymer materials. Alternatively, the striking plate may be composed of titanium, and the second material would then be composed of copper, aluminum, brass, magnesium, ceramics, composites or polymer materials. Yet further, the striking plate may be composed of an even softer material than titanium, and the second material would generally be a polymer material. The polymer materials would have a low dampening (loss) factor so that the deformation of the polymer doesn't increase energy losses during impact with a golf ball.




The softer annular deflection enhancement member will reduce the stiffness of the striking plate. Thus, during impact with a golf ball, the striking plate will more easily deform or deflect, thus decreasing the deformation of the golf ball. Moreover, the contact time between the striking plate and the golf ball will increase thereby lowering the strain rate deformation of the golf ball. These factors will significantly decrease the energy lost during impact, or stated differently, these factors will increase the energy transfer from the golf club to the golf ball. The energy transfer will result in a golf club head having an increased coefficient of restitution. The coefficient of restitution is measured under test conditions, such as those specified by the USGA. The standard USGA conditions for measuring the coefficient of restitution is set forth in the


USGA Procedure for Measuring the Velocity Ratio of a Club Head for Conformance to Rule


4-1


e, Appendix II. Revision I, Aug


. 4, 1998


and Revision


0


, Jul


. 6, 1998, available from the USGA.




Another aspect of the present invention is an iron golf club head. The iron golf club head has a body, a striking plate and an annular deflection enhancement member. The body has a shallow hollow interior and a face opening thereto. The striking plate has an exterior surface and an interior surface. The annular deflection enhancement member is disposed between the body and the striking plate, and isolates the striking plate from the body. The striking plate is composed of a first material and the annular deflection enhancement member is composed of a second material. The first material has a Young's Modulus greater than that of the second material. Preferably, the Young's Modulus of the second material is at least twenty-five percent lower than that of the first material. More preferably, the Young's Modulus of the second material is at least fifty percent lower than that of the first material.




Yet another aspect of the present invention is a body, a striking plate and an deflection enhancement means having a Young's modulus lower than that of the striking plate. The deflection enhancement means may be the material of the body modified from the rest of the body or a solder.




Having briefly described the present invention, the above and further objects, features and advantages thereof will be recognized by those skilled in the pertinent art from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a front plan view of a golf club head of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a front plan view of an alternative embodiment of a golf club head of the present invention.





FIG. 3

is an exploded view of the golf club head of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3A

is an isolated top plan view of a portion of the gasket of the present invention.





FIG. 3B

is an isolated plan view of the crown/face transition area of the golf club head of present invention.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of the golf club head of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 5

is an enlarged view of circle


5


of FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is an isolated cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the gasket, striking plate and body interface of the present invention.





FIG. 7

is an isolated cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the gasket, striking plate and body interface of the present invention.





FIG. 8

is an isolated cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the gasket, striking plate and body interface of the present invention.





FIG. 9

is an isolated cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the gasket, striking plate and body interface of the present invention.





FIG. 10

is an isolated cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the gasket, striking plate and body interface of the present invention.





FIG. 11

is an isolated cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the gasket, striking plate and body interface of the present invention.





FIG. 12

is an isolated cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the gasket, striking plate and body interface of the present invention.





FIG. 13

is an isolated cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the gasket, striking plate and body interface of the present invention.





FIG. 14

is a side view of a golf club head of the present invention immediately prior to low swing speed impact with a golf ball.





FIG. 15

is a side view of a golf club head of the present invention during low swing speed impact with a golf ball.





FIG. 16

is a side view of a golf club head of the present invention immediately after low swing speed impact with a golf ball.





FIG. 17

is a front view of a iron golf club head embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed at a golf club head having a gasket that isolates the striking plate from the entirety of the body of the golf club head. This isolation of the striking plate allows for a golf club head with a high coefficient of restitution thereby enabling for greater distance of a golf ball hit with the golf club head of the present invention. The coefficient of restitution (also referred to herein as “COR”) is determined by the following equation:






e
=



v
2

-

v
1




U
1

-

U
2













wherein U


1


is the club head velocity prior to impact; U


2


is the golf ball velocity prior to impact which is zero; ν


1


is the club head velocity just after separation of the golf ball from the face of the club head; ν


2


is the golf ball velocity just after separation of the golf ball from the face of the club head; and e is the coefficient of restitution between the golf ball and the club face. The values of e are limited between zero and 1.0 for systems with no energy addition. The coefficient of restitution, e, for a material such as a soft clay or putty would be near zero, while for a perfectly elastic material, where no energy is lost as a result of deformation, the value of e would be 1.0. The present invention provides a club head having a coefficient of restitution approaching 0.9, as measured under conventional test conditions.




As shown in

FIGS. 1-5

, a golf club is generally designated


20


. The golf club


20


has a club head


22


that is engaged with a shaft


24


. A ferrule


26


encircles the shaft


24


at an aperture


27


to a hosel


29


. The club head


22


has a body


28


, an annular deflection enhancement member


30


and a striking plate


32


. The annular deflection enhancement member


30


encompasses the perimeter of the striking plate


32


thereby isolating the striking plate


32


from the entirety of the club head body


28


. The striking plate


32


may have a plurality of scorelines


34


thereon. The striking plate


32


generally extends from a heel end


36


of the club head


22


to a to end


38


of the club head


22


.




The body


28


has a crown


40


and a sole


42


. As shown in

FIG. 3

, the body


28


has a hollow interior


44


. Positioned inside the hollow interior


44


is the hosel


29


. The body also has a front opening


45


for positioning of the annular deflection enhancement member


30


and striking plate


32


therein. Alternatively, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


may be composed of a plurality of portions


31




a-d


which may range from two to twenty.




The annular deflection enhancement member


30


has an upper surface


50


, an exterior surface


51


, a lower surface


52


and an interior surface


53


. As shown in

FIGS. 3A

,


3


B,


4


and


5


, the upper surface


50


of the annular deflection enhancement member


30


engages a crown/face transition area


54


of the body


28


while the interior surface


53


engages a shoulder


56


of the crown/face transition area


54


. A sole/face transition area


58


, with a shoulder


60


, engages the lower portion of the annular deflection enhancement member


30


similar to the annular deflection enhancement member


30


engagement with the crown/face transition area


54


. Preferably, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


and striking plate


32


are press-fitted into the opening


45


of the body


28


under high pressure to ensure a secure fitting. In addition to the mechanical adhesion, a chemical adhesion may be used to ensure a secure fitting. The chemical adhesion may be implemented through heating of the materials (if only metal materials are employed) or through an adhesive material such as an epoxy or polyurethane adhesive. However, an adhesive component may have a small dampening effect during impact with a golf ball. Additionally, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


may be molded or cast in position about the opening


45


of the body


28


.




The striking plate


32


is generally composed of a single piece of metal, and is preferably composed of steel or titanium. However, the striking plate


32


may be composed of a composite material such as carbon fibers dispersed with a resin sheet. However, those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that the striking plate


32


may be composed of other materials such as vitreous metals, ceramics, other fibrous materials, and the like without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. The thickness of the striking plate


32


may range from 0.010 inches to 0.200, and the striking plate may have a non-uniform thickness such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,084 for a Contoured Golf Club Face which is hereby incorporated by reference.




The annular deflection enhancement member


30


has a Young's Modulus that is lower than the Young's Modulus of the striking plate


32


. Preferably, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


has a Young's Modulus that is twenty-five percent lower than the Young's Modulus of the striking plate


32


, and most preferably the annular deflection enhancement member


30


has a Young's Modulus that is fifty percent lower than the Young's Modulus of the striking plate


32


. However, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


may have a Young's modulus that is only ten percent less than the striking plate


32


. The Young's Modulus is a measurement of the elastic modulus or stiffness of a material. For example, if the striking plate


32


is composed of stainless steel, it has a Young's Modulus of 2×10


11


Pascals, and thus the annular deflection enhancement member


30


must have a Young's Modulus no greater than 1.5×10


11


Pascals. Thus, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


may be composed of titanium (Young Modulus of 1.1×10


11


Pascals), copper or brass (Young Modulus of 1.1×10


11


Pascals), aluminum (Young Modulus of 6.8×10


10


Pascals), magnesium (Young Modulus of 4.4×10


10


Pascals), a polymer material (Young Modulus of 0.0007-1.4×10


10


Pascals), lead (Young Modulus of 1.8×10


10


Pascals), nickel (Young Modulus of 4.6×10


10


Pascals), tin (Young Modulus of 4.0×10


10


Pascals), glass/epoxy (Young Modulus of 1.4-0.8×10


10


Pascals), graphite/epoxy (Young Modulus of 5.0-30×10


10


Pascals), kevlar/epoxy (Young Modulus of 1.4-7.5×10


10


Pascals), wood (Young Modulus of 0.68-1.7×10


10


Pascals), or the like. If the striking plate


32


is composed of a stainless steel material, then the annular deflection enhancement member


30


is preferably composed of a copper material.




In an alternate example, if the string plate


32


is composed of titanium, it has a Young's Modulus of 1.1×10


11


Pascals, and thus the annular deflection enhancement member


30


should have a Young's Modulus no greater than 0.825×10


11


Pascals. Thus, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


may be composed of copper or brass (Young Modulus of 1.1×10


11


Pascals), aluminum (Young Modulus of 6.8×10


11


Pascals),magnesium (Young Modulus of 4.4×10


10


Pascals), a polymer material (Young Modulus of 0.0007-1.4×10


10


Pascals), lead (Young Modulus of 1.8×10


10


Pascals), nickel (Young Modulus of 4.6×10


10


Pascals), tin (Young Modulus of 4.0×10


10


Pascals), glass/epoxy (Young Modulus of 1.4-0.8×10


10


Pascals), graphite/epoxy (Young Modulus of 5.0-30×10


10


Pascals), kevlar/epoxy (Young Modulus of 1.4-7.5×10


10


Pascals), wood (Young Modulus of 0.68-1.7×10


10


Pascals), or the like. If the striking plate


32


is composed of titanium, then the annular deflection enhancement member


30


is preferably composed of a magnesium material.




In yet another example, if the striking plate


32


is composed of a composite material, it has a Young's Modulus of 3-20×10


10


Pascals, and thus the annular deflection enhancement member


30


must have a Young's Modulus no greater than 2-15×10


10


Pascals. Thus, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


is composed of a polymer material such as a polyurethane, a polyethylene or an ionomer material.




As mentioned previously, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


isolates the striking plate


32


from the entirety of the body


28


allowing for greater deflection of the striking plate


32


during impact with a golf ball. The compliance of the striking plate


32


during impact with the golf ball allows for a coefficient of restitution greater than that of a continuous head. This compliance of the striking plate


32


is possible even though the striking plate may be fairly rigid, and non-compliant if engaged with the body


28


. However, the annular deflection enhancement member


30


, with a Young's Modulus at least twenty-five percent lower than that of the striking plate


32


, allows for compliance of the striking plate


32


during impact with a golf ball.





FIGS. 6-13

illustrate different embodiments of the annular deflection enhancement member


30


, striking plate


32


and body


28


interface. As shown in

FIG. 6

, the annular deflection enhancement member


30




a


has an “L” shape with a upper portion


62


and a lower portion


64


. The striking plate


32


engages both the upper and lower portions


62


and


64


of the annular deflection enhancement member


30




a.






As shown in

FIG. 7

, the annular deflection enhancement member


30




b


has a cross shape with upper and lower portions


66




a-b


, and forward and rearward portions


68




a-b


. The crown/face transition area


54


has two extensions


56




a-b


that form a cavity for engagement with the upper portion


66




a


of the annular deflection enhancement member


30




b


. The striking plate


32


has a perimeter cavity for receiving the lower portion


66




b


of the annular deflection enhancement member


30




b.






As shown in

FIG. 8

, the annular deflection enhancement member


30




c


is disposed behind the striking plate


32


, primarily engaging the shoulder


56


and the interior surface of the striking plate


32


. A small gap


71


lies between the striking plate


32


and crown/face transition area


54


.





FIGS. 9-11

are primarily directed at annular deflection enhancement members


30




d-f


composed of injectable materials such as thermoplastic materials and injectable metals. However, the annular deflection enhancement members


30




d-f


may be non-injectable materials. As shown in

FIG. 9

, the annular deflection enhancement member


30




d


has an angled portion


70


and a straight portion


72


. The crown/face transition area


54


has a cavity to receive the annular deflection enhancement member


30




d


, and the striking plate


32


is angled to engage the annular deflection enhancement member


30




d


. The annular deflection enhancement member


30




e


of

FIG. 10

has an “H” shape with a forward portion


74


, a rearward portion


76


and a middle portion


78


. The crown/face transition area


54


has a projection


56


′ that engages the annular deflection enhancement member


30




e


, and the striking plate


32


has a projection


80


that engages the annular deflection enhancement member


30




e


. The annular deflection enhancement member


30




f


of FIG.


11


is angled to match the angle of the striking plate


32


and the crown/face transition area


54


.





FIGS. 12 and 13

illustrate annular deflection enhancement members


30




g


and


30




h


that are mechanically secure. The annular deflection enhancement member


30




g


has an “H” shape with a forward portion


74


′, a rearward portion


76


′ and a middle portion


78


′. The crown/face transition area


54


engages the annular deflection enhancement member


30




g


within the forward and rearward portions


74


′ and


76


′, and the striking plate


32


engages the annular deflection enhancement member


30




e


within the forward and rearward portions


74


′ and


76


′. The annular deflection enhancement member 30h has a “U” shape. A front plate


82


is attached by a pin


84


that also secures the striking plate and the annular deflection enhancement member


30




h


to the shoulder


56


″ of the body


28


.




As shown in

FIGS. 14-16

, the flexibility of the striking plate


26


allows for a greater coefficient of restitution during impact with a golf ball. At

FIG. 14

, the striking plate


32


is immediately prior to striking a golf ball


100


. At

FIG. 15

, the striking plate


32


is engaging the golf ball, and deformation of the golf ball


100


and striking plate


32


is illustrated. A lesser deformation of the golf ball


100


and increased contact time leads to a lower loss of energy thereby increasing the coefficient of restitution. At

FIG. 16

, the golf ball


100


has just been launched from the striking plate


32


.




The golf club head of the present invention may be a wood-type, an iron-type or even a putter-type golf club head.

FIG. 17

illustrates an iron type golf club head


22


′. The golf club head


22


′ has a body


28


′ with a annular deflection enhancement member


30


′ and a striking plate


32


′. The striking plate


32


′ has a plurality of scorelines


34


′ thereon. The iron golf club head


22


′ also has a hosel


29


′ for engagement of a shaft therewith. The iron golf club head


22


′ has a shallow hollow interior


44


′, not shown, that allows for compliance of the striking plate


32


′ during impact with a golf ball.




From the foregoing it is believed that those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize the meritorious advancement of this invention and will readily understand that while the present invention has been described in association with a preferred embodiment thereof, and other embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings, numerous changes, modifications and substitutions of equivalents may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention which is intended to be unlimited by the foregoing except as may appear in the following appended claims. Therefore, the embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined in the following appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A wood-type golf club head comprising:a body having a hollow interior and a face opening thereto; a striking plate having an exterior surface and an interior surface and composed of a titanium material having a Young's Modulus of approximately 1.1×1011 Pascals and a thickness ranging from 0.010 inch to 0.200 inch; and an annular deflection enhancement member disposed between the body and the striking plate, the annular deflection enhancement member composed of a material having a Young's Modulus less than 0.825×1011 Pascals and selected from the group consisting of copper, aluminum, brass and magnesium, the annular deflection enhancement member isolating the striking plate from the body; wherein the golf club head has a coefficient of restitution greater than 0.83.
  • 2. The wood-type golf club head according to claim 1 wherein the annular deflection enhancement member comprises a plurality of portions.
  • 3. The wood-type golf club head according to claim 1 wherein the annular deflection enhancement member has an “H” cross-sectional shape.
  • 4. The wood-type golf head according to claim 1 wherein the annular deflection enhancement member has an “L” cross-sectional shape.
  • 5. The wood-type golf head according to claim 1 further comprising a pin for connecting the striking plate and the annular deflection enhancement member to the body.
  • 6. A wood-type golf club head comprising:a body having a hollow interior and a face opening thereto; a striking plate having an exterior surface and an interior surface and composed of stainless steel and having a Young's Modulus of approximately 2×1011 Pascals, and a thickness ranging from 0.010 inch to 0.200 inch; and an annular deflection enhancement member disposed between the body and the striking plate, the annular deflection enhancement member composed of a material selected from the group consisting of copper, brass, aluminum and magnesium, and having a Young's Modulus less than 1.5×1011 Pascals, the annular deflection enhancement member isolating the striking plate from the body; wherein the golf club bead has a coefficient of restitution greater than 0.83.
  • 7. A wood-type golf club head comprising:a body having a hollow interior and a face opening thereto; a striking plate having an exterior surface and an interior surface and composed of a graphite material having a Young's Modulus of ranging from 3×1010 Pascals to 20×1010 Pascals, and a thickness ranging from 0.010 inch to 0.200 inch; and an annular deflection enhancement member disposed between the body and the striking plate, the annular deflection enhancement member composed of a polyurethane material and having a Young's Modulus less than 2×1010 Pascals, the annular deflection enhancement member isolating the striking plate from the body; wherein the golf club head has a coefficient of restitution greater than 0.83.
US Referenced Citations (43)
Number Name Date Kind
1562956 Guerne Nov 1925 A
3937474 Jepson et al. Feb 1976 A
3970236 Rogers Jul 1976 A
3975023 Inamori Aug 1976 A
3989248 Campau Nov 1976 A
4252262 Igarashi Feb 1981 A
4326716 Lacoste Apr 1982 A
4398965 Campau Aug 1983 A
4498672 Bulla Feb 1985 A
4824110 Kobayashi Apr 1989 A
4884812 Nagasaki et al. Dec 1989 A
5261663 Anderson Nov 1993 A
5261664 Anderson Nov 1993 A
5271621 Lo Dec 1993 A
5299807 Hutin Apr 1994 A
5310185 Viollaz et al. May 1994 A
5332214 Tucker, Sr. Jul 1994 A
5364103 Chen et al. Nov 1994 A
5398929 Kitaichi Mar 1995 A
5403007 Chen Apr 1995 A
5417419 Anderson et al. May 1995 A
5431396 Shieh Jul 1995 A
5447311 Viollaz Sep 1995 A
5458334 Sheldon et al. Oct 1995 A
5460371 Takeda Oct 1995 A
5467983 Chen Nov 1995 A
5494281 Chen Feb 1996 A
5505453 Mack Apr 1996 A
5524331 Pond Jun 1996 A
5588922 Schmidt et al. Dec 1996 A
5703294 McConnell et al. Dec 1997 A
5743813 Chen et al. Apr 1998 A
5797807 Moore Aug 1998 A
5816936 Aizawa Oct 1998 A
5863261 Eggiman Jan 1999 A
5873791 Allen Feb 1999 A
5888148 Allen Mar 1999 A
5993329 Shieh Nov 1999 A
6001030 Delaney Dec 1999 A
6001032 Onuki Dec 1999 A
6042486 Gallagher Mar 2000 A
6083117 Hsu Jul 2000 A
6117023 Onuki Sep 2000 A